82 FR 42076 - Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube From Mexico: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 171 (September 6, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 171 (September 6, 2017)
| Page Range | 42076-42078 | |
| FR Document | 2017-18825 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 6, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 42076-42078] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-18825] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-201-836] Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube From Mexico: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube (LWRPT) from Mexico. The period of review is August 1, 2015, through July 31, 2016. The review covers one producer/ exporter of the subject merchandise, Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A. de C.V (Productos Laminados). We preliminarily determine that sales of subject merchandise by Productos Laminados and affiliated reseller, Aceros Cuatros Caminos S.A. de C.V. (A4C) (collectively, Prolamsa), were not made at less than normal value during the period of review. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable September 6, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Heeren, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-9179. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background These preliminary results of review are made in accordance with section 733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). On October 14, 2016, the Department published the notice of initiation for the administrative review.\1\ For a complete [[Page 42077]] description of the events that followed the initiation of the review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\2\ A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix II to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, located in room B8094 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 71061 (October 14, 2016) (Initiation Notice) as corrected in Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 78778 (November 9, 2016) (Correction Notice). \2\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico; 2015-2016,'' dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The products covered by the scope of the order are LWRPT from Mexico. For a complete description of the scope, see Appendix I of this notice. Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying the preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Preliminary Results of Review We preliminarily determine that, for the period August 1, 2015, through July 31, 2016, the following weighted-average dumping margin exists: \3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ The Department has preliminarily determined to collapse, and treat as a single entity, affiliates Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A. de C.V. and Aceros Cuatro Caminos S.A. de C.V. For our analysis of the collapsing criteria, see Memorandum, ``Analysis Memorandum for Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A. de C.V. and Aceros Cuatro Caminos S.A. de C.V. in the Preliminary Results of the 2015/2016 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty order on Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico,'' dated concurrently with this notice. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- Producer/exporter average margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A. de C.V./Aceros 0.00 Cuatros Caminos S.A. de C.V........................... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure and Public Comment The Department will disclose to parties to the proceeding any calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results of review within five days after the date of publication of this notice.\4\ Interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.\5\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\6\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\7\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b). \5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). \6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1). \7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). \8\ See 19 CFR 351.303. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice.\9\ Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a date and time to be determined.\10\ Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \10\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unless extended, the Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of our analysis of all issues raised in the case briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\11\ If a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis in the final results of this review and the respondent reported reliable entered values, we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem assessment rates for the merchandise based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales made during the period of review to each importer to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If the respondent has not reported reliable entered values, we will calculate a per-unit assessment rate for each importer by dividing the total amount of dumping for the examined sales made during the period of review to that importer by the total sales quantity associated with those transactions. Where an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). If the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, we will instruct CBP not to assess duties on any of its entries in accordance with the Final Modification for Reviews, i.e., ``{w{time} here the weighted-average margin of dumping for the exporter is determined to be zero or de minimis, no antidumping duties will be assessed.'' \12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \12\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted- Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regarding entries of subject merchandise during the period of review that were produced by Prolamsa and for which they did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed entries at the all-others rate of 3.76 percent, as established in the less-than-fair-value investigation of the order, if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\13\ For a full [[Page 42078]] discussion of this matter, see Assessment Policy Notice.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico, the People's Republic of China, and the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders; Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 73 FR 45403, (August 5, 2008) (Order). \14\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Prolamsa will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which they were reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or in the investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be the all-others rate of 3.76 percent. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: August 30, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I Scope of the Order The scope of this order covers certain welded carbon-quality light-walled steel pipe and tube, of rectangular (including square) cross section, having a wall thickness of less than 4 mm. The term carbon-quality steel includes both carbon steel and alloy steel which contains only small amounts of alloying elements. Specifically, the term carbon-quality includes products in which none of the elements listed below exceeds the quantity by weight respectively indicated; 1.80 percent of manganese, or 2.25 percent of silicon, or 1.00 percent of copper, or 0.50 percent of aluminum, or 1.25 percent of chromium, or 0.30 percent of cobalt, or 0.40 percent of lead, or 1.25 percent of nickel, or 0.30 percent of tungsten, or 0.10 percent of molybdenum, or 0.10 percent of niobium, or 0.15 percent of vanadium, or 0.15 percent of zirconium. The description of carbon-quality is intended to identify carbon-quality products within the scope. The welded-carbon quality rectangular pipe and tube subject to the order is currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 7306.61.50.00 and 7306.61.70.60. This tariff classification is provided for convenience and Customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Background 2. Scope of the Order 3. Affiliation and Collapsing of Affiliates 4. Comparisons to Normal Value A. Determination of Comparison Method B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis 5. Product Comparisons 6. Date of Sale 7. Export Price/Constructed Export Price 8. Normal Value A. Home Market Viability as Comparison Market B. Level of Trade C. Sales to Affiliates D. Cost of Production 1. Calculation of Cost of Production 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices 3. Results of the Cost of Production Test E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices F. Price-to-Constructed Value Comparison 9. Currency Conversion 10. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-18825 Filed 9-5-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![42076 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 6, 2017 / Notices
merchandise in accordance with the complete segment of this proceeding, Individual Examination
final results of this review. the cash deposit rate will be the rate Discussion of the Issues
For DSM and Hyundai Steel, we established for the most recent period Comment 1: Differential Pricing
calculated importer-specific assessment for the producer of the merchandise; (4) Comment 2: Major-Input Rule
rates on the basis of the ratio of the total Comment 3: Cost Differences Not
the cash deposit rate for all other Associated With Physical Characteristics
amount of antidumping duties manufacturers or exporters will Comment 4: Cost of Prime Products
calculated for each importer’s examined continue to be 0.98 percent,8 the all- Comment 5: Affiliated-Party Inputs
sales and the total entered value of the others rate determined in the less-than- Comment 6: Overrun Sales
sales in accordance with 19 CFR fair-value (LTFV) investigation, adjusted Comment 7: Marine Insurance
351.212(b)(1).7 For entries of subject for the export-subsidy rate in the Comment 8: Reviewable Entries
merchandise during the period of companion countervailing duty [FR Doc. 2017–18824 Filed 9–5–17; 8:45 am]
review produced by DSM or Hyundai investigation. These cash deposit BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Steel for which it did not know its requirements, when imposed, shall
merchandise was destined for the remain in effect until further notice.
United States, we will instruct CBP to DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
liquidate unreviewed entries at the all- Notification to Importers
others rate if there is no rate for the This notice serves as a final reminder International Trade Administration
intermediate company(ies) involved in to importers of their responsibility
the transaction. For the companies under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a [A–201–836]
which were not selected for individual certificate regarding the reimbursement
Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and
examination, BDP International, Bookuk of antidumping duties prior to
Tube From Mexico: Preliminary
Steel Co., Ltd., Samsung C&T liquidation of the relevant entries
Results of Antidumping Duty
Engineering & Construction Group, during this review period. Failure to
Administrative Review; 2015–2016
Samsung C&T Trading and Investment comply with this requirement could
Group, and Sung Jin Steel Co., Ltd., we result in the Secretary’s presumption AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
will instruct CBP to apply the rates that reimbursement of antidumping International Trade Administration,
listed above to all entries of subject duties occurred and the subsequent Department of Commerce.
merchandise produced and/or exported assessment of double antidumping SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
by these firms. For the eight companies duties. (the Department) is conducting an
that we determined had no reviewable administrative review of the
Notification Regarding Administrative
entries of the subject merchandise in antidumping duty order on light-walled
Protective Orders
this review period, we will instruct CBP rectangular pipe and tube (LWRPT)
to liquidate any applicable entries of This notice also serves as a reminder
from Mexico. The period of review is
subject merchandise at the all-others to parties subject to administrative
August 1, 2015, through July 31, 2016.
rate. We intend to issue liquidation protective order (APO) of their
The review covers one producer/
instructions to CBP 15 days after responsibility concerning the
exporter of the subject merchandise,
publication of the final results of these disposition of proprietary information
Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A.
reviews. disclosed under APO in accordance
de C.V (Productos Laminados). We
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
Cash Deposit Requirements preliminarily determine that sales of
written notification of the return or
subject merchandise by Productos
The following deposit requirements destruction of APO materials or
Laminados and affiliated reseller,
will be applicable upon publication of conversion to judicial protective order is
Aceros Cuatros Caminos S.A. de C.V.
this notice for all shipments of CTL hereby requested. Failure to comply
(A4C) (collectively, Prolamsa), were not
plate from Korea entered, or withdrawn with the regulations and the terms of an
made at less than normal value during
from warehouse, for consumption on or APO is a violation subject to sanction.
This notice is published in the period of review. Interested parties
after the date of publication, as provided
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and are invited to comment on these
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR preliminary results.
The cash deposit rate for the companies
listed above will be equal to the 351.221(b)(5). DATES: Applicable September 6, 2017.
weighted-average dumping margins Dated: August 30, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
established in the final results of this Gary Taverman. Madeline Heeren, AD/CVD Operations,
administrative review; (2) for Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
merchandise exported by producers or and Countervailing Duty Operations, International Trade Administration,
exporters not covered in this review but performing the non-exclusive functions and U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
covered in a prior completed segment of duties of the Assistant Secretary for Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
the proceeding, the cash deposit rate Enforcement and Compliance. DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–9179.
will continue to be the company- SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Appendix
specific rate published for the most
recent period; (3) if the exporter is not List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Background
a firm covered in this review, a prior Decision Memorandum These preliminary results of review
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
review, or the original investigation but Summary are made in accordance with section
the producer has been covered in a prior Background 733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
Scope of the Order amended (the Act). On October 14,
Rates for Respondents Not Selected for
7 In these final results, the Department applied
2016, the Department published the
the assessment rate calculation method adopted in notice of initiation for the
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 8 See, e.g., Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Steel Plate Products from the Republic of Korea: administrative review.1 For a complete
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 Review and New Shipper Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
(February 14, 2012). 62712, 62714 (September 12, 2016). Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:37 Sep 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM 06SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_42247/page/1.svg)
![42078 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 6, 2017 / Notices
discussion of this matter, see Notification to Interested Parties 6. Date of Sale
Assessment Policy Notice.14 7. Export Price/Constructed Export Price
We are issuing and publishing this 8. Normal Value
We intend to issue liquidation notice in accordance with sections
instructions to CBP 15 days after A. Home Market Viability as Comparison
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Market
publication of the final results of this
Dated: August 30, 2017. B. Level of Trade
review. C. Sales to Affiliates
Gary Taverman,
Cash Deposit Requirements D. Cost of Production
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 1. Calculation of Cost of Production
The following cash deposit and Countervailing Duty Operations, 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
requirements will be effective upon performing the non-exclusive functions and 3. Results of the Cost of Production Test
publication of the final results of this duties of the Assistant Secretary for E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
administrative review for all shipments Enforcement and Compliance. Comparison Market Prices
of the subject merchandise entered, or Appendix I F. Price-to-Constructed Value Comparison
withdrawn from warehouse, for 9. Currency Conversion
consumption on or after the publication Scope of the Order 10. Recommendation
date of the final results of this The scope of this order covers certain [FR Doc. 2017–18825 Filed 9–5–17; 8:45 am]
administrative review, as provided by welded carbon-quality light-walled steel pipe BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The and tube, of rectangular (including square)
cash deposit rate for Prolamsa will be cross section, having a wall thickness of less
equal to the weighted-average dumping than 4 mm. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
The term carbon-quality steel includes
margin established in the final results of
both carbon steel and alloy steel which International Trade Administration
this administrative review; (2) for contains only small amounts of alloying
previously reviewed or investigated elements. Specifically, the term carbon- Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
companies not listed above, the cash quality includes products in which none of Order, Finding, or Suspended
deposit rate will continue to be the the elements listed below exceeds the
Investigation; Advance Notification of
company-specific rate published for the quantity by weight respectively indicated;
1.80 percent of manganese, or 2.25 percent of Sunset Reviews
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding in which they were silicon, or 1.00 percent of copper, or 0.50
percent of aluminum, or 1.25 percent of AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm International Trade Administration,
chromium, or 0.30 percent of cobalt, or 0.40
covered in this review, a prior review, percent of lead, or 1.25 percent of nickel, or Department of Commerce.
or in the investigation but the producer 0.30 percent of tungsten, or 0.10 percent of
is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate molybdenum, or 0.10 percent of niobium, or Background
established for the most recently 0.15 percent of vanadium, or 0.15 percent of
completed segment of this proceeding zirconium. Every five years, pursuant to Tariff
for the producer of the merchandise; The description of carbon-quality is Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the
and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other intended to identify carbon-quality products Department of Commerce (the
producers or exporters will continue to within the scope. The welded-carbon quality Department) and the International Trade
rectangular pipe and tube subject to the order Commission automatically initiate and
be the all-others rate of 3.76 percent. is currently classified under the Harmonized
These cash deposit requirements, when conduct a review to determine whether
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) revocation of a countervailing or
imposed, shall remain in effect until subheadings 7306.61.50.00 and
further notice. 7306.61.70.60. This tariff classification is
antidumping duty order or termination
provided for convenience and Customs of an investigation suspended under
Notification to Importers purposes; however, the written description of section 704 or 734 of the Act would be
This notice also serves as a reminder the scope of the order is dispositive. likely to lead to continuation or
to importers of their responsibility recurrence of dumping or a
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a Appendix II countervailable subsidy (as the case may
certificate regarding the reimbursement be) and of material injury.
of antidumping duties prior to List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum Upcoming Sunset Reviews for October
liquidation of the relevant entries 2017
during this review period. Failure to 1. Background
comply with this requirement could 2. Scope of the Order
Pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act,
3. Affiliation and Collapsing of Affiliates
result in the Department’s presumption 4. Comparisons to Normal Value the following Sunset Reviews are
that reimbursement of antidumping A. Determination of Comparison Method scheduled for initiation in October 2017
duties occurred and the subsequent B. Results of the Differential Pricing and will appear in that month’s Notice
assessment of double antidumping Analysis of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Reviews
duties. 5. Product Comparisons (Sunset Reviews).
Department contact
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Silicomanganese from China (A–570–828) (4th Review) ............................................................................ Robert James (202) 482–0649.
Silicomanganese from Ukraine (A–823–805) (4th Review) ......................................................................... Robert James (202) 482–0649.
14 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:37 Sep 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM 06SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_42247/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-09-06 00:56:53
Document Modified: 2017-09-06 00:56:53
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable September 6, 2017. | |
| Contact | Madeline Heeren, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-9179. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 42076 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR