82_FR_4285 82 FR 4276 - Endangered and Threatened Species; Petition for Rulemaking To Establish a Whale Protection Zone for Southern Resident Killer Whales

82 FR 4276 - Endangered and Threatened Species; Petition for Rulemaking To Establish a Whale Protection Zone for Southern Resident Killer Whales

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 9 (January 13, 2017)

Page Range4276-4277
FR Document2017-00437

This document announces receipt by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) of a petition for rulemaking to establish a whale protection zone in the San Juan Islands, Washington, to support recovery of endangered Southern Resident killer whales. NMFS is requesting comments on the petition and will consider all comments and available information when determining whether to accept the petition and proceed with the suggested rulemaking.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 9 (Friday, January 13, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4276-4277]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00437]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Parts 223 and 224

RIN 0648-XF080


Endangered and Threatened Species; Petition for Rulemaking To 
Establish a Whale Protection Zone for Southern Resident Killer Whales

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

[[Page 4277]]

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces receipt by the National Marine 
Fisheries Service (NMFS) of a petition for rulemaking to establish a 
whale protection zone in the San Juan Islands, Washington, to support 
recovery of endangered Southern Resident killer whales. NMFS is 
requesting comments on the petition and will consider all comments and 
available information when determining whether to accept the petition 
and proceed with the suggested rulemaking.

DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is April 13, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit information on this document identified by 
NOAA-NMFS-2016-0152 and the petition by either of the following 
methods:
     Electronic submission: Submit all electronic public 
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal www.regulations.gov. To 
submit comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal, go to 
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2016-0152, click the 
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or 
attach your comments.
     Mail or hand-delivery: Lynne Barre, NMFS West Coast 
Region, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Seattle, WA 98115.
    Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other 
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period, 
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the 
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on 
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying 
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business 
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily 
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous 
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain 
anonymous).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynne Barre, West Coast Regional 
Office, 206-526-4745.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 2009, NMFS proposed vessel traffic 
regulations to minimize vessel impacts to Southern Resident killer 
whales, including a 200-yard approach rule, a prohibition on parking 
vessels in the path of the whales, and a protected area (no-go zone) in 
Puget Sound along the west side of San Juan Island, Washington (74 FR 
37674; July 29, 2009). In 2011, we finalized vessel traffic regulations 
that included an approach rule and path prohibitions but did not 
finalize a protected area (76 FR 20870; April 14, 2011). In deciding 
not to move forward with a protected area in the final rule, we noted 
the degree of public opposition to the concept and concluded a no-go 
zone required further analysis. We further noted that to be effective, 
regulations must be understood by the public and have a degree of 
public acceptance. We stated that we would evaluate the enacted 
regulations, gather additional information and conduct further analysis 
and public outreach on the concept of identifying a protected area or 
no-go zone as a future protective measure. Since 2011, we have 
conducted a public workshop in 2013, continued communicating with a 
variety of interested groups (including the petitioners) on this topic, 
and are currently completing a review of the 2011 vessel traffic 
regulations. NOAA's Northwest Fisheries Science Center has also 
conducted further research on the impacts of vessels on Southern 
Resident killer whales.
    On November 10, 2016, NMFS received a petition pursuant to the 
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) from the Orca Relief Citizen's 
Alliance, Center for Biological Diversity, and Project Seawolf 
requesting that we utilize our authorities under the Endangered Species 
Act (ESA) and Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) to establish a whale 
protection zone to reduce noise and disturbance of Southern Resident 
killer whales. The petitioners identify threats to the whales, discuss 
alleged insufficiencies with existing protections, and describe NMFS' 
authority under the ESA and MMPA to establish a whale protection zone 
with regulations. The petition describes the features of a whale 
protection zone and cites information from our evaluation of the 
benefits of a protected area supporting our 2009 proposed rule. The 
area proposed for a protection zone is similar to, but wider and longer 
than the zone originally considered by NMFS in 2009 (74 FR 37674; July 
29, 2009).
    To ensure our decision about whether to accept the petition and 
move forward with the petitioned action to establish a whale protection 
zone is based on the best available scientific and commercial 
information, we are soliciting information from the public, 
governmental agencies, Tribes, the scientific community, industry, 
environmental entities, and any other interested parties concerning the 
petitioned action. In particular we request information and comments 
on: (1) The advisability of and need for regulations to establish a 
whale protection zone; (2) the geographic scope of regulations; (3) 
alternative management options for regulating vessel interactions with 
killer whales, including but not limited to the option in the petition; 
(4) scientific and commercial information regarding the effects of 
vessels on killer whales and their habitat; (5) information regarding 
potential economic effects of regulating vessel interactions; and (6) 
any additional relevant information that NMFS should consider should it 
accept the petition. To inform your comments, information on the 
previous vessel regulations, the petition and other supporting 
documents is available at: http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/protected_species/marine_mammals/killer_whale/vessel_regulations.html.
    You may submit your information and materials electronically or via 
mail (see ADDRESSES section). We request that all information be 
accompanied by supporting documentation such as maps, bibliographic 
references, or reprints of pertinent publications. We also would 
appreciate the submitter's name, address, and any association, 
institution, or business that the person represents; however, anonymous 
submissions will also be accepted.
    If NMFS decides to accept the petition and initiate rulemaking, we 
will notify the petitioners and publish a notice of our decision in the 
Federal Register. If NMFS decides not to proceed with the petitioned 
action, we will notify the petitioners, provide a brief statement of 
the grounds for the decision, and publish notice of our decision in the 
Federal Register.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.

    Dated: January 6, 2017.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-00437 Filed 1-12-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P



                                                      4276                      Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules

                                                      comment on whether to allocate                             5. In the April 2014 Connect America                them in the memorandum. Documents
                                                      additional high-cost funding to the                     FNPRM, 79 FR 39196, July 9, 2014, the                  shown or given to Commission staff
                                                      voluntary path to the model. Rate-of-                   Commission proposed a framework for                    during ex parte meetings are deemed to
                                                      return carriers that accept the second                  a voluntary election by rate-of-return                 be written ex parte presentations and
                                                      offer of model-based support will do so                 carriers to receive model-based support                must be filed consistent with rule
                                                      on the condition that they commit to                    and tentatively concluded that such a                  1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by
                                                      meet the deployment obligations of the                  framework could achieve important                      rule 1.49(f) or for which the
                                                      original offer if authorized no later than              universal service benefits by creating                 Commission has made available a
                                                      December 31, 2017 to receive additional                 incentives for deployment of voice and                 method of electronic filing, written ex
                                                      A–CAM funding equivalent to the                         broadband-capable infrastructure. The                  parte presentations and memoranda
                                                      original offer. The Commission therefore                Commission sought written comment on                   summarizing oral ex parte
                                                      seeks comment on whether the                            the proposal, including comment on the                 presentations, and all attachments
                                                      Commission should further increase the                  Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis                thereto, must be filed through the
                                                      budget for A–CAM to provide the full                    (IRFA). The Commission did not receive                 electronic comment filing system
                                                      amount of the original offer for some or                any comments on the April 2014                         available for that proceeding, and must
                                                      all of those carriers that accepted the                 Connect America FNPRM IRFA. In the                     be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc,
                                                      second offer of model-based support.                    Rate-of-Return Reform Order, 81 FR                     .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants
                                                         2. The Commission seeks comment on                   24282, April 25, 2016, the Commission                  in this proceeding should familiarize
                                                      increasing the budget by a lesser                       adopted a voluntary path under which                   themselves with the Commission’s ex
                                                      amount. If the increased budget for A–                  rate-of-return carriers may elect to                   parte rules.
                                                      CAM were insufficient to cover all                      receive model-based support for a term                   7. People with Disabilities: To request
                                                      participants, should the Wireline                       of 10 years in exchange for meeting                    materials in accessible formats for
                                                      Competition Bureau (Bureau) prioritize                  defined build-out obligations. The                     people with disabilities (braille, large
                                                      funding to those with the least                         Commission issued a Final Regulatory                   print, electronic files, audio format),
                                                      broadband deployment using the same                     Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) that                       send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
                                                      data set as that utilized for the adjusted              conforms to the Regulatory Flexibility                 the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
                                                      offer? Alternatively, if the Commission                 Act of 1980 (RFA), as amended. This                    Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202–
                                                      increases the budget by a smaller                       present Report and Order and Further                   418–0432 (TTY).
                                                      amount, should the Bureau revise the                    Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
                                                      offers to an amount less than the                                                                              III. Ordering Clauses
                                                                                                              implements the framework previously
                                                      original offer? In that latter situation, the           adopted by the Commission and seeks                       8. It is further ordered, pursuant to the
                                                      Commission expects that the Bureau                      comment on additional funding to                       authority contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i),
                                                      would make a new offer, limited to the                  implement that framework. The                          5, 10, 201–206, 214, 218–220, and 254
                                                      carriers that originally elected the first              Commission promulgates no additional                   of the Communications Act of 1934, as
                                                      offer and accepted the revised offer;                   final rules, and our present action is,                amended, and section 706 of the
                                                      those carriers would be free to choose                  therefore, not an RFA matter.                          Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47
                                                      whether to accept that new offer and the                                                                       U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i), 155, 160, 201–
                                                      associated broadband deployment                            6. The proceeding this Notice initiates
                                                                                                              shall be treated as a ‘‘permit-but-                    206, 214, 218–220, 254, and 1302, and
                                                      obligations.                                                                                                   sections 1.1, 1.3, 1.421, 1.427, and 1.429
                                                         3. The Commission notes that                         disclose’’ proceeding in accordance
                                                                                                              with the Commission’s ex parte rules.                  of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.1,
                                                      commenters responding to the Bureau’s                                                                          1.3, 1.421, 1.427, and 1.429, that this
                                                      A–CAM Election Results Public Notice                    Persons making ex parte presentations
                                                                                                              must file a copy of any written                        Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
                                                      uniformly support increasing the A–                                                                            is adopted, effective thirty (30) days
                                                      CAM budget by more than $50 million.                    presentation or a memorandum
                                                                                                              summarizing any oral presentation                      after publication of the text or summary
                                                      The Commission would need to
                                                                                                              within two business days after the                     thereof in the Federal Register.
                                                      increase the overall high-cost budget by
                                                      an additional $110 million per year if all              presentation (unless a different deadline              Federal Communications Commission.
                                                      carriers elect the second offer, and by a               applicable to the Sunshine period                      Marlene H. Dortch,
                                                      lesser amount if fewer do. The                          applies). Persons making oral ex parte                 Secretary.
                                                      Commission invites comment from all                     presentations are reminded that                        [FR Doc. 2017–00598 Filed 1–12–17; 8:45 am]
                                                      interested stakeholders on whether to                   memoranda summarizing the                              BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
                                                      enlarge the budget for A–CAM support,                   presentation must (1) list all persons
                                                      including the costs and benefits of                     attending or otherwise participating in
                                                      allocating limited funding for this                     the meeting at which the ex parte
                                                      particular purpose.                                     presentation was made, and (2)                         DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                                                                                              summarize all data presented and
                                                      II. Procedural Matters                                  arguments made during the                              National Oceanic and Atmospheric
                                                         4. This document does not contain                    presentation. If the presentation                      Administration
                                                      new information collection                              consisted in whole or in part of the
                                                      requirements subject to the Paperwork                   presentation of data or arguments                      50 CFR Parts 223 and 224
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                      Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public                     already reflected in the presenter’s
                                                      Law 104–13. In addition, therefore, it                  written comments, memoranda or other                   RIN 0648–XF080
                                                      does not contain any new or modified                    filings in the proceeding, the presenter               Endangered and Threatened Species;
                                                      information collection burden for small                 may provide citations to such data or                  Petition for Rulemaking To Establish a
                                                      business concerns with fewer than 25                    arguments in his or her prior comments,                Whale Protection Zone for Southern
                                                      employees, pursuant to the Small                        memoranda, or other filings (specifying                Resident Killer Whales
                                                      Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,                  the relevant page and/or paragraph
                                                      Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.                       numbers where such data or arguments                   AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries
                                                      3506(c)(4).                                             can be found) in lieu of summarizing                   Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and


                                                 VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:35 Jan 12, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00079   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\13JAP1.SGM   13JAP1


                                                                                Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules                                                 4277

                                                      Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),                      2009). In 2011, we finalized vessel                    request information and comments on:
                                                      Commerce.                                               traffic regulations that included an                   (1) The advisability of and need for
                                                      ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition;                  approach rule and path prohibitions but                regulations to establish a whale
                                                      request for comments.                                   did not finalize a protected area (76 FR               protection zone; (2) the geographic
                                                                                                              20870; April 14, 2011). In deciding not                scope of regulations; (3) alternative
                                                      SUMMARY:    This document announces                     to move forward with a protected area                  management options for regulating
                                                      receipt by the National Marine Fisheries                in the final rule, we noted the degree of              vessel interactions with killer whales,
                                                      Service (NMFS) of a petition for                        public opposition to the concept and                   including but not limited to the option
                                                      rulemaking to establish a whale                         concluded a no-go zone required further                in the petition; (4) scientific and
                                                      protection zone in the San Juan Islands,                analysis. We further noted that to be
                                                      Washington, to support recovery of                                                                             commercial information regarding the
                                                                                                              effective, regulations must be
                                                      endangered Southern Resident killer                                                                            effects of vessels on killer whales and
                                                                                                              understood by the public and have a
                                                      whales. NMFS is requesting comments                     degree of public acceptance. We stated                 their habitat; (5) information regarding
                                                      on the petition and will consider all                   that we would evaluate the enacted                     potential economic effects of regulating
                                                      comments and available information                      regulations, gather additional                         vessel interactions; and (6) any
                                                      when determining whether to accept the                  information and conduct further                        additional relevant information that
                                                      petition and proceed with the suggested                 analysis and public outreach on the                    NMFS should consider should it accept
                                                      rulemaking.                                             concept of identifying a protected area                the petition. To inform your comments,
                                                      DATES: The closing date for comments                    or no-go zone as a future protective                   information on the previous vessel
                                                      on the petition is April 13, 2017.                      measure. Since 2011, we have                           regulations, the petition and other
                                                      ADDRESSES: You may submit                               conducted a public workshop in 2013,                   supporting documents is available at:
                                                      information on this document identified                 continued communicating with a                         http://
                                                      by NOAA–NMFS–2016–0152 and the                          variety of interested groups (including                www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/
                                                      petition by either of the following                     the petitioners) on this topic, and are                protected_species/marine_mammals/
                                                      methods:                                                currently completing a review of the                   killer_whale/vessel_regulations.html.
                                                         • Electronic submission: Submit all                  2011 vessel traffic regulations. NOAA’s
                                                                                                                                                                       You may submit your information and
                                                      electronic public comments via the                      Northwest Fisheries Science Center has
                                                                                                              also conducted further research on the                 materials electronically or via mail (see
                                                      Federal e-Rulemaking Portal                                                                                    ADDRESSES section). We request that all
                                                      www.regulations.gov. To submit                          impacts of vessels on Southern Resident
                                                                                                              killer whales.                                         information be accompanied by
                                                      comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking                                                                          supporting documentation such as
                                                      Portal, go to www.regulations.gov/                         On November 10, 2016, NMFS
                                                                                                              received a petition pursuant to the                    maps, bibliographic references, or
                                                      #!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2016-
                                                                                                              Administrative Procedure Act (APA)                     reprints of pertinent publications. We
                                                      0152, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
                                                                                                              from the Orca Relief Citizen’s Alliance,               also would appreciate the submitter’s
                                                      complete the required fields, and enter
                                                                                                              Center for Biological Diversity, and                   name, address, and any association,
                                                      or attach your comments.
                                                         • Mail or hand-delivery: Lynne Barre,                Project Seawolf requesting that we                     institution, or business that the person
                                                      NMFS West Coast Region, 7600 Sand                       utilize our authorities under the                      represents; however, anonymous
                                                      Point Way NE., Seattle, WA 98115.                       Endangered Species Act (ESA) and                       submissions will also be accepted.
                                                         Instructions: Comments sent by any                   Marine Mammal Protection Act
                                                                                                                                                                       If NMFS decides to accept the petition
                                                      other method, to any other address or                   (MMPA) to establish a whale protection
                                                                                                                                                                     and initiate rulemaking, we will notify
                                                      individual, or received after the end of                zone to reduce noise and disturbance of
                                                                                                              Southern Resident killer whales. The                   the petitioners and publish a notice of
                                                      the comment period, may not be                                                                                 our decision in the Federal Register. If
                                                      considered by NMFS. All comments                        petitioners identify threats to the
                                                                                                              whales, discuss alleged insufficiencies                NMFS decides not to proceed with the
                                                      received are a part of the public record                                                                       petitioned action, we will notify the
                                                      and will generally be posted for public                 with existing protections, and describe
                                                                                                              NMFS’ authority under the ESA and                      petitioners, provide a brief statement of
                                                      viewing on www.regulations.gov                                                                                 the grounds for the decision, and
                                                      without change. All personal identifying                MMPA to establish a whale protection
                                                                                                              zone with regulations. The petition                    publish notice of our decision in the
                                                      information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
                                                                                                              describes the features of a whale                      Federal Register.
                                                      confidential business information, or
                                                                                                              protection zone and cites information                    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
                                                      otherwise sensitive information
                                                                                                              from our evaluation of the benefits of a
                                                      submitted voluntarily by the sender will                                                                         Dated: January 6, 2017.
                                                                                                              protected area supporting our 2009
                                                      be publicly accessible. NMFS will                                                                              Samuel D. Rauch III,
                                                                                                              proposed rule. The area proposed for a
                                                      accept anonymous comments (enter
                                                                                                              protection zone is similar to, but wider               Deputy Assistant Administrator for
                                                      ‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish
                                                                                                              and longer than the zone originally                    Regulatory Programs, National Marine
                                                      to remain anonymous).
                                                                                                              considered by NMFS in 2009 (74 FR                      Fisheries Service.
                                                      FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        37674; July 29, 2009).                                 [FR Doc. 2017–00437 Filed 1–12–17; 8:45 am]
                                                      Lynne Barre, West Coast Regional                           To ensure our decision about whether                BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
                                                      Office, 206–526–4745.                                   to accept the petition and move forward
                                                      SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 2009,                     with the petitioned action to establish a
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                      NMFS proposed vessel traffic                            whale protection zone is based on the
                                                      regulations to minimize vessel impacts                  best available scientific and commercial
                                                      to Southern Resident killer whales,                     information, we are soliciting
                                                      including a 200-yard approach rule, a                   information from the public,
                                                      prohibition on parking vessels in the                   governmental agencies, Tribes, the
                                                      path of the whales, and a protected area                scientific community, industry,
                                                      (no-go zone) in Puget Sound along the                   environmental entities, and any other
                                                      west side of San Juan Island,                           interested parties concerning the
                                                      Washington (74 FR 37674; July 29,                       petitioned action. In particular we


                                                 VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:35 Jan 12, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00080   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 9990   E:\FR\FM\13JAP1.SGM   13JAP1



Document Created: 2017-01-13 02:44:30
Document Modified: 2017-01-13 02:44:30
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionNotice of receipt of petition; request for comments.
DatesThe closing date for comments on the petition is April 13, 2017.
ContactLynne Barre, West Coast Regional Office, 206-526-4745.
FR Citation82 FR 4276 
RIN Number0648-XF08
CFR Citation50 CFR 223
50 CFR 224

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR