82 FR 4299 - Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People's Republic of China: Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 9 (January 13, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 9 (January 13, 2017)
| Page Range | 4299-4300 | |
| FR Document | 2017-00682 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 4299-4300] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-00682] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-601] Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People's Republic of China: Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On August 11, 2016, the Department of Commerce (Department) initiated an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on tapered roller bearings and parts thereof, finished and unfinished (TRBs) from the People's Republic of China (PRC) for eight companies. Based on timely withdrawal of requests for review, we are now rescinding this administrative review with respect to two of these companies, Changshan Peer Bearing Co. Ltd. (CPZ/SKF) and GGB Bearing Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. (GGB). DATES: Effective January 13, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Medley or Whitley Herndon, AD/ CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4987 or (202) 482-6274, respectively. Background In June 2016, the Department received multiple timely requests to conduct an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on TRBs from the PRC. Based upon these requests, on August 11, 2016, in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, [[Page 4300]] as amended (the Act), the Department published a notice of initiation of an administrative review covering the period June 1, 2015, through May 31, 2016, with respect to eight companies.\1\ On September 29, 2016, and October 11, 2016, CPZ/SKF and GGB, respectively, withdrew their requests for an administrative review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 53121 (August 11, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Partial Rescission Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party who requested the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of publication of notice of initiation of the requested review. CPZ/SKF and GGB timely withdrew their requests for an administrative review of themselves; no other party requested a review of these companies. Accordingly, we are rescinding this review, in part, with respect to these companies, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). Assessment The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. For CPZ/ SKF and GGB, the companies for which these reviews are rescinded, antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of this notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751 and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Dated: January 10, 2017. Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2017-00682 Filed 1-12-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices 4299
administrative reviews should ensure August 16, 2013, should use the formats limits. These modifications are effective
that they meet the requirements of these for the revised certifications provided at for all segments initiated on or after
procedures (e.g., the filing of separate the end of the Final Rule.13 The October 21, 2013. Please review the
letters of appearance as discussed at 19 Department intends to reject factual final rule, available at http://www.gpo.
CFR 351.103(d)). submissions in any proceeding gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/
segments if the submitting party does 2013-22853.htm, prior to submitting
Revised Factual Information
not comply with applicable revised factual information in these segments.
Requirements
certification requirements. These initiations and this notice are
On April 10, 2013, the Department in accordance with section 751(a) of the
published Definition of Factual Revised Extension of Time Limits
Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR
Information and Time Limits for Regulation
351.221(c)(1)(i).
Submission of Factual Information: On September 20, 2013, the
Dated: January 9, 2017.
Final Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April 10, Department modified its regulation
2013), which modified two regulations concerning the extension of time limits Gary Taverman,
related to antidumping and for submissions in antidumping and Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
countervailing duty proceedings: The countervailing duty proceedings: Final Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
definition of factual information (19 Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013).
CFR 351.102(b)(21)), and the time limits The modification clarifies that parties [FR Doc. 2017–00674 Filed 1–12–17; 8:45 am]
for the submission of factual may request an extension of time limits BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
information (19 CFR 351.301). The final before a time limit established under
rule identifies five categories of factual Part 351 expires, or as otherwise
information in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21), specified by the Secretary. In general, an DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
which are summarized as follows: (i) extension request will be considered
International Trade Administration
Evidence submitted in response to untimely if it is filed after the time limit
questionnaires; (ii) evidence submitted established under Part 351 expires. For [A–570–601]
in support of allegations; (iii) publicly submissions which are due from
available information to value factors multiple parties simultaneously, an Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts
under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure extension request will be considered Thereof, Finished and Unfinished,
the adequacy of remuneration under 19 untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on From the People’s Republic of China:
CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed the due date. Examples include, but are Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping
on the record by the Department; and (v) not limited to: (1) Case and rebuttal Duty Administrative Review; 2015–
evidence other than factual information briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; 2016
described in (i)–(iv). The final rule (2) factual information to value factors AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
requires any party, when submitting under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure International Trade Administration,
factual information, to specify under the adequacy of remuneration under 19 Department of Commerce.
which subsection of 19 CFR CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19
SUMMARY: On August 11, 2016, the
351.102(b)(21) the information is being CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal,
submitted and, if the information is clarification and correction filed Department of Commerce (Department)
submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) initiated an administrative review of the
factual information already on the comments concerning the selection of a antidumping duty order on tapered
record, to provide an explanation surrogate country and surrogate values roller bearings and parts thereof,
identifying the information already on and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning finished and unfinished (TRBs) from the
the record that the factual information U.S. Customs and Border Protection People’s Republic of China (PRC) for
seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The data; and (5) quantity and value eight companies. Based on timely
final rule also modified 19 CFR 351.301 questionnaires. Under certain withdrawal of requests for review, we
so that, rather than providing general circumstances, the Department may are now rescinding this administrative
time limits, there are specific time limits elect to specify a different time limit by review with respect to two of these
based on the type of factual information which extension requests will be companies, Changshan Peer Bearing Co.
being submitted. These modifications considered untimely for submissions Ltd. (CPZ/SKF) and GGB Bearing
are effective for all segments initiated on which are due from multiple parties Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. (GGB).
or after May 10, 2013. Please review the simultaneously. In such a case, the DATES: Effective January 13, 2017.
final rule, available at http:// Department will inform parties in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/ letter or memorandum setting forth the Andrew Medley or Whitley Herndon,
1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to deadline (including a specified time) by AD/CVD Operations, Office II,
submitting factual information in this which extension requests must be filed Enforcement and Compliance,
segment. to be considered timely. This International Trade Administration,
Any party submitting factual modification also requires that an U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
information in an antidumping duty or extension request must be made in a Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
countervailing duty proceeding must separate, stand-alone submission, and DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4987 or
certify to the accuracy and completeness clarifies the circumstances under which (202) 482–6274, respectively.
of that information.12 Parties are hereby
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the Department will grant untimely- Background
reminded that revised certification filed requests for the extension of time
requirements are in effect for company/ In June 2016, the Department received
government officials as well as their 13 See Certification of Factual Information To multiple timely requests to conduct an
representatives. All segments of any Import Administration During Antidumping and administrative review of the
antidumping duty or countervailing Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July antidumping duty order on TRBs from
17, 2013) (‘‘Final Rule’’); see also the frequently
duty proceedings initiated on or after asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available
the PRC. Based upon these requests, on
at http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_ August 11, 2016, in accordance with
12 See section 782(b) of the Act. info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:06 Jan 12, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM 13JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_4308/page/1.svg)
![4300 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
as amended (the Act), the Department to govern business proprietary Results.1 In accordance with 19 CFR
published a notice of initiation of an information in this segment of the 351.309(c)(1)(ii), we invited parties to
administrative review covering the proceeding. Timely written notification comment on our Preliminary Results.
period June 1, 2015, through May 31, of the return/destruction of APO No parties submitted comments.
2016, with respect to eight companies.1 materials or conversion to judicial
On September 29, 2016, and October 11, protective order is hereby requested. Rescission
2016, CPZ/SKF and GGB, respectively, Failure to comply with the regulations It is the Department’s practice to
withdrew their requests for an and terms of an APO is a violation
rescind an administrative review of a
administrative review. which is subject to sanction.
CVD order, pursuant to CFR
Partial Rescission This notice is issued and published in
351.213(d)(3), when there are no
accordance with sections 751 and
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the reviewable entries of subject
777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
Secretary will rescind an administrative merchandise during the POR for which
351.213(d)(4).
review, in whole or in part, if a party liquidation is suspended.2 Normally,
who requested the review withdraws Dated: January 10, 2017. upon completion of an administrative
the request within 90 days of the date Gary Taverman, review, the suspended entries are
of publication of notice of initiation of Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for liquidated at the CVD assessment rate
the requested review. CPZ/SKF and Antidumping and Countervailing Duty calculated for the review period. See 19
GGB timely withdrew their requests for Operations.
CFR 351.212(b)(1). Therefore, for an
an administrative review of themselves; [FR Doc. 2017–00682 Filed 1–12–17; 8:45 am]
administrative review to be conducted,
no other party requested a review of BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
there must be a reviewable, suspended
these companies. Accordingly, we are entry that the Department can order CBP
rescinding this review, in part, with to liquidate at the newly calculated CVD
respect to these companies, pursuant to DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
assessment rate. Accordingly, in the
19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
International Trade Administration absence of suspended entries of subject
Assessment merchandise during the period of this
The Department will instruct U.S. [C–570–955] administrative review (January 1, 2014,
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to through December 31, 2014), we are
assess antidumping duties on all Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From rescinding this administrative review of
appropriate entries. For CPZ/SKF and the People’s Republic of China: the CVD order on MCBs from the PRC.
GGB, the companies for which these Rescission of Countervailing Duty We are issuing and publishing this
reviews are rescinded, antidumping Administrative Review; 2014 notice in accordance with sections
duties shall be assessed at rates equal to 751(a)(1) and 777(1) of the Tariff Act of
the cash deposit of estimated AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR
antidumping duties required at the time
U.S. Department of Commerce. 351.213(d)(4).
of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse,
for consumption, in accordance with 19 SUMMARY: On September 13, 2016, the Dated: January 9, 2017.
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department Department of Commerce (the Gary Taverman,
intends to issue appropriate assessment Department) published the preliminary Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
instructions to CBP 15 days after results of the administrative review of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
publication of this notice. the countervailing duty (CVD) order on Operations.
certain chemically-bonded magnesia [FR Doc. 2017–00689 Filed 1–12–17; 8:45 am]
Notification to Importers
carbon bricks (MCBs) from the People’s
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
This notice serves as a reminder to Republic of China (PRC). The period of
importers of their responsibility under review (POR) is January 1, 2014,
19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate through December 31, 2014. The
regarding the reimbursement of Department preliminarily found no
antidumping duties prior to liquidation evidence of any reviewable entries and
of the relevant entries during this received no comments on the 1 See Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from the
review period. Failure to comply with preliminary results. Therefore, the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
this requirement could result in the Department is rescinding the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2014,
Secretary’s presumption that administrative review of the CVD order 81 FR 62870 (September 13, 2016) (Preliminary
reimbursement of antidumping duties on MCBs from the PRC. Results).
occurred and the subsequent assessment 2 See, e.g., Certain Welded Carbon Steel Standard
DATES: Effective January 13, 2017.
of doubled antidumping duties. Pipe and Tube from Turkey: Notice of Final
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative
Notification Regarding Administrative Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations, Review, In Part, 77 FR 6542 (February 8, 2012). In
Protective Orders Office VII, Enforcement and the Preliminary Results the Department stated ‘‘As
This notice also serves as a reminder Compliance, International Trade is our practice, the Department finds that it is not
to parties subject to administrative appropriate to rescind this review, but, rather, to
Administration, U.S. Department of
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
complete this review and to issue appropriate
protective order (APO) of their Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution instructions to CBP based on the final results of this
responsibility concerning the return or Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; review.’’ This sentence was included in error. The
destruction of proprietary information telephone: (202) 482–4261. Department issues preliminary and final results in
disclosed under APO in accordance SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: so-called ‘‘no shipment’’ reviews in antidumping
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues proceedings only. See, e.g., Silicomanganese from
Background India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
1 SeeInitiation of Antidumping and Administrative Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR 28826
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
On September 13, 2016, the (May 10, 2016) and accompanying Decision
53121 (August 11, 2016). Department published the Preliminary Memorandum at 3.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:06 Jan 12, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM 13JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_4308/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2017-01-13 02:44:36
Document Modified: 2017-01-13 02:44:36
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective January 13, 2017. | |
| Contact | Andrew Medley or Whitley Herndon, AD/ CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4987 or (202) 482-6274, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 4299 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR