82 FR 43251 - Comments Regarding Listing on the National Register of Historic Places of Statue of Liberty Enlightening the World, Liberty Island, New York Harbor
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 177 (September 14, 2017)
National Park Service
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 177 (September 14, 2017)
| Page Range | 43251-43252 | |
| FR Document | 2017-19571 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 177 (Thursday, September 14, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 43251-43252] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-19571] [[Page 43251]] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service [NPS-WASO-NRNHL-24004; PPWOCRADI0, PCU00RP14.R50000] Comments Regarding Listing on the National Register of Historic Places of Statue of Liberty Enlightening the World, Liberty Island, New York Harbor AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the National Park Service is publishing New York (NY) and New Jersey (NJ) State Historic Preservation Officers' (SHPOs) comments to the National Park Service Federal Preservation Officer (FPO) as well as responses to SHPOs' comments by the Keeper of the National Register (Keeper) prior to including the property in the National Register (NR). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice includes comments on the NR Nomination entitled ``Statue of Liberty Enlightening the World'' received by the FPO from the NY SHPO and the NJ SHPO, and the responses by the Keeper to these comments. NY SHPO: The NY SHPO reviewed the following nomination and responded to the FPO within 45 days of receipt of the nomination. The NY SHPO objected to the period of significance established for the Statue, the period of significance proposed end date of 1957 (instead of 1986) for the district as a whole, and the omission of an area of landscape architecture and architecture as areas significance for the period 1957-1986. The specific comments received by the FPO from the NY SHPO are as follows: I am writing in response to your request for comments on the most recent revised draft for the Statue of Liberty Enlightening the World Historic District. Ruth Pierpont has retired and I am the new Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer for New York. I have reviewed the file and our comments remain the same as they were for the two previous drafts. Unfortunately, the New York State Historic Preservation Office cannot support a period of significance that extends ``in perpetuity'' because we do not believe it is possible to evaluate the significance of events that have not yet occurred. Absent any theme, place, or time in which to place these unknown events, there is no possible context in which to evaluate their meaning. This opinion, which I support, is explained in more detail in Ruth Pierpont's letter of June 6, 2012. We would also like to re-state our support of a period of significance for the landscape elements that extends to include the 1986 alterations for the statue's centennial. The fact that you have judged changes related to its centennial as non-contributing after extolling the statue's unending significance is among the reasons that we feel a period of ``in perpetuity'' is unwise. At the very least, it will generate unnecessary confusion in the compliance process as each newly-proposed project then automatically becomes significant, regardless of its effect on the resource. Keeper's Response to NY SHPO Comments: The Statue of Liberty (including its pedestal) is a singular (Keeper's emphasis), exceptionally significant, individually NR-eligible historic structure. The significance of the Statue to the nation is, and will always be, both transcendent and perpetual. It is not unprecedented for a property with transcendent significance to be listed in the NR with period of significance that is ongoing. The NR listing for National Mall Historic District in Washington, DC--under Criterion A--is another example. The Keeper notes that several properties located in the State of New York, including Our Lady of Mount Carmel Grotto, Richmond County, New York (listed in the NR in 2000), and Bohemian Hall and Park, in Queens County, New York (listed in the NR in 2001), also have ongoing periods of significance because of their recognition as NR-eligible Traditional Cultural Properties. The nomination as written is for a historic district. The Keeper notes that it is a long-established, and common NR program practice for an individually eligible or individually listed historic structure located within a larger NR-listed historic district to have a different period of significance than the district as a whole. Based on all relevant documentation and comments received for the nomination, the Keeper finds that the proposed end date for the period of significance for the district as a whole--1957--is appropriate. The Keeper concurs with the assessment stated in section 7, page 28 of the nomination, which states: ``Changes made to key elements of the Liberty Island Grounds in the mid-1980s and alterations over time to contributing buildings and structures preclude the District's eligibility in the areas of Landscape Architecture or Architecture.'' On balance, the Keeper also finds that the post-1957 changes in the landscape and buildings for the district as a whole (Keeper's emphasis), do not appear to satisfy the ``exceptional importance'' threshold embodied in NR Criterion Exception G for properties that have achieved significance within the past fifty years. NJ SHPO: The NJ SHPO reviewed the nomination and responded to the FPO within 45 days of receipt of the nomination. The NJ SHPO objected to the nomination document's failure to recognize the State of New Jersey's jurisdictional claim over a portion of Liberty Island and other related matters. The specific comments received by the FPO from the NJ SHPO are as follows: NJ SHPO Comment 1 (Concerning Section 2a): The opening page of the Registration Form should indicate that the two states in which this district is situated are New York and New Jersey, and that the two counties are New York and Hudson. Keeper's response to NJ SHPO Comment 1: The Keeper notes that the most important function of Section 2a. is to readily identify the location of the property in its most common format. In the present case, the Keeper has concluded, especially in light of the jurisdiction issues raised by the NJ SHPO, that the most appropriate way to achieve this purpose is to have Section 2a. of the Nomination Form read as follows for the items noted below: Street & number: Liberty Island, New York Harbor City or town: State, County: Vicinity: No Not For Publication: No NJ SHPO Comment 2 (Concerning Section 7, page 6): The narrative should explain that while the majority of Liberty Island is situated within the State of New York, including the ground upon which the Statue stands, the western portion of the island (approximately 3.4 acres) is ground within New Jersey borders. In 1834, a determination of the boundary between New York and New Jersey was the subject of a bi- state compact, subsequently approved by Congress. Congressional approval of this compact acknowledged New Jersey's ownership of the submerged lands west of the midline of the Hudson River. In 1857 Bedloes Island (today's Liberty Island) was carefully surveyed and mapped. It was found to be 9.9 acres in size to mean high water, 10.7 acres in size to mean low water. An additional 183,756 square feet of filled land, or approximately 4.22 acres was added to Liberty Island in stages between 1901 and 1952. In light of the above, the statement that ``the entire island is Federally owned'' (Section 7, page 6) should be revised. New Jersey's position has historically been that the portion of the island that remains within New Jersey's sovereign jurisdiction is also owned by the State of New Jersey, as part of its ownership of riparian lands in New [[Page 43252]] Jersey. The State of New Jersey has a long history of selling portions of its riparian lands at fair market value, to appropriate users, in the form of ``riparian grants.'' The National Park Service bought a riparian grant from New Jersey in 1904 to legitimize its expansion of Ellis Island, but even though New Jersey sought from the 1930s to the 1950s to reach agreement with the Federal government to convey title for the filled portions of Liberty Island, no agreement, and therefore no such transfer, was effected. No Federal purchase of the land has subsequently been completed. The Federal government has continued to use the property without obtaining a riparian grant. That situation has not changed. As a result, the State of New Jersey's ownership interest in the land artificially filled after 1834 was not extinguished and still remains in effect. In addition, the further statement that ``the land mass [of Liberty Island] is considered part of New York County, New York.'' (Section 7, page 6) should also be revised. Only the portion of Liberty Island that reflects the island as it existed in 1834 lies within New York County, New York. In our previous comments on the earlier draft, we provided a map that delineated the area the island's fill, showing that New Jersey's territory comprises approximately 3.4 acres of the island's 14.1 acres. (see attachment) New Jersey disagrees with the wording of footnote #5 (Section 7, page 6), which has a tendentious effect. The National Park Service has every reasonable basis to conclude, as New Jersey holds, that Liberty Island is situated in both states, and does not need to claim in this footnote that it is not pronouncing upon an issue that Section 2 of the document clearly does. Your letter cites the 1998 Supreme Court decision in New Jersey v. New York, decided in New Jersey's favor (a point not mentioned in footnote #5), in which it was held that the portion of Ellis Island composed of landfill emplaced subsequent to the Compact of 1834 has remained in the territory of New Jersey since the time of that compact. With respect to the neighboring Liberty Island, the factual circumstances are nearly identical and the same legal reasoning applies that formed the basis of the Ellis Island decision. As a result, the National Park Service should recognize New Jersey sovereignty over the western portion of the island. Keeper's response to NJ SHPO Comment 2 (Concerning Section 7, page 6): The Keeper disagrees with the NJ SHPO's contention that, ``The National Park Service has every reasonable basis to conclude, as New Jersey holds, that Liberty Island is situated in both states . . .'' The Keeper agrees with the NPS assertion that boundary issues between states are matters of original jurisdiction with the U.S. Supreme Court, and that neither the Keeper nor the National Park Service are fitted by expertise or authority to pronounce upon them. Since the issue regarding jurisdiction that was raised by the NJ SHPO cannot be resolved within the context of this nomination, the Keeper has determined that the most appropriate course of action is to ensure that, as approved by the Keeper, the paragraph under ``Setting'' on page 7-6 reads: Liberty Island is located within New York Harbor, one of the world's busiest shipping ports. It is accessed by ferries that run regularly from landings at Liberty State Park in Jersey City, New Jersey, and Battery Park at the southern tip of Manhattan, New York City. The island is manifestly flat, with an average elevation of about 15 feet (ft) above sea level. The landform is approximately a quarter-mile long and about .15-mile wide at its widest point. Two significant filling events, conducted on the west side of the island by the US Army during the First World War and on the northwestern end of the island by the National Park Service in the early 1950s, accreted the island to its current 14.1-acre form. Liberty Island is surrounded by New Jersey state waters. The Statue in its entirety was constructed and remains within the territorial jurisdiction of the State of New York. The entire island is administered by the National Park Service. The Statue of Liberty is located on the southern portion of Liberty Island and is immediately surrounded on the east, west, and south sides by grass lawns. Visitors arrive at the island's West Pier after a ferry trip from Manhattan or Jersey City and usually walk to the Statue on the island's primary circulation system, a wide paved system of malls and plazas that conveys visitors to the main entrance to the Statue. The malls and plazas are lined with linden trees and yew hedges that give the setting a park-like feel. A secondary circulation system consisting of interior paths and a perimeter promenade offers other views of the Statue and New York Harbor from a variety of vantage points. Operational facilities such as maintenance buildings and staff housing are located primarily in the northwest corner of the island and are screened from public view in most directions. (**Note: footnote #5 referenced in the NJ SHPOs comments regarding the above paragraph has been corrected to read as footnote #6 in the final nomination document.) Authority: The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, 54 U.S.C. 302104 (c)(5)-(6) of; 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60. Dated: August 14, 2017. J. Paul Loether, Chief, NR of Historic Places/National Historic Landmarks Program and Keeper, NR of Historic Places. [FR Doc. 2017-19571 Filed 9-13-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-52-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 177 / Thursday, September 14, 2017 / Notices 43251
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR fact that you have judged changes related to within 45 days of receipt of the
its centennial as non-contributing after nomination. The NJ SHPO objected to
National Park Service extolling the statue’s unending significance is the nomination document’s failure to
among the reasons that we feel a period of recognize the State of New Jersey’s
[NPS–WASO–NRNHL–24004; ‘‘in perpetuity’’ is unwise. At the very least,
PPWOCRADI0, PCU00RP14.R50000] it will generate unnecessary confusion in the
jurisdictional claim over a portion of
compliance process as each newly-proposed Liberty Island and other related matters.
Comments Regarding Listing on the project then automatically becomes The specific comments received by the
National Register of Historic Places of significant, regardless of its effect on the FPO from the NJ SHPO are as follows:
Statue of Liberty Enlightening the resource. NJ SHPO Comment 1 (Concerning
World, Liberty Island, New York Harbor Keeper’s Response to NY SHPO Section 2a): The opening page of the
Comments: The Statue of Liberty Registration Form should indicate that
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
(including its pedestal) is a singular the two states in which this district is
ACTION: Notice. situated are New York and New Jersey,
(Keeper’s emphasis), exceptionally
SUMMARY: In accordance with the significant, individually NR-eligible and that the two counties are New York
National Historic Preservation Act of historic structure. The significance of and Hudson.
1966, the National Park Service is the Statue to the nation is, and will Keeper’s response to NJ SHPO
publishing New York (NY) and New always be, both transcendent and Comment 1: The Keeper notes that the
Jersey (NJ) State Historic Preservation perpetual. It is not unprecedented for a most important function of Section 2a.
Officers’ (SHPOs) comments to the property with transcendent significance is to readily identify the location of the
National Park Service Federal to be listed in the NR with period of property in its most common format. In
Preservation Officer (FPO) as well as significance that is ongoing. The NR the present case, the Keeper has
responses to SHPOs’ comments by the listing for National Mall Historic District concluded, especially in light of the
Keeper of the National Register (Keeper) in Washington, DC—under Criterion jurisdiction issues raised by the NJ
prior to including the property in the A—is another example. The Keeper SHPO, that the most appropriate way to
National Register (NR). notes that several properties located in achieve this purpose is to have Section
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This the State of New York, including Our 2a. of the Nomination Form read as
notice includes comments on the NR Lady of Mount Carmel Grotto, follows for the items noted below:
Nomination entitled ‘‘Statue of Liberty Richmond County, New York (listed in Street & number: Liberty Island, New
Enlightening the World’’ received by the the NR in 2000), and Bohemian Hall and York Harbor
FPO from the NY SHPO and the NJ Park, in Queens County, New York City or town:
SHPO, and the responses by the Keeper (listed in the NR in 2001), also have State, County:
to these comments. ongoing periods of significance because Vicinity: No
NY SHPO: The NY SHPO reviewed of their recognition as NR-eligible Not For Publication: No
the following nomination and Traditional Cultural Properties. NJ SHPO Comment 2 (Concerning
responded to the FPO within 45 days of The nomination as written is for a Section 7, page 6): The narrative should
receipt of the nomination. The NY historic district. The Keeper notes that explain that while the majority of
SHPO objected to the period of it is a long-established, and common NR Liberty Island is situated within the
significance established for the Statue, program practice for an individually State of New York, including the ground
the period of significance proposed end eligible or individually listed historic upon which the Statue stands, the
date of 1957 (instead of 1986) for the structure located within a larger NR- western portion of the island
district as a whole, and the omission of listed historic district to have a different (approximately 3.4 acres) is ground
an area of landscape architecture and period of significance than the district within New Jersey borders. In 1834, a
architecture as areas significance for the as a whole. Based on all relevant determination of the boundary between
period 1957–1986. The specific documentation and comments received New York and New Jersey was the
comments received by the FPO from the for the nomination, the Keeper finds subject of a bi-state compact,
NY SHPO are as follows: that the proposed end date for the subsequently approved by Congress.
I am writing in response to your request for period of significance for the district as Congressional approval of this compact
comments on the most recent revised draft a whole—1957—is appropriate. The acknowledged New Jersey’s ownership
for the Statue of Liberty Enlightening the Keeper concurs with the assessment of the submerged lands west of the
World Historic District. Ruth Pierpont has stated in section 7, page 28 of the midline of the Hudson River. In 1857
retired and I am the new Deputy State nomination, which states: ‘‘Changes Bedloes Island (today’s Liberty Island)
Historic Preservation Officer for New York. made to key elements of the Liberty was carefully surveyed and mapped. It
I have reviewed the file and our comments Island Grounds in the mid-1980s and was found to be 9.9 acres in size to
remain the same as they were for the two mean high water, 10.7 acres in size to
alterations over time to contributing
previous drafts. Unfortunately, the New York
State Historic Preservation Office cannot buildings and structures preclude the mean low water. An additional 183,756
support a period of significance that extends District’s eligibility in the areas of square feet of filled land, or
‘‘in perpetuity’’ because we do not believe it Landscape Architecture or approximately 4.22 acres was added to
is possible to evaluate the significance of Architecture.’’ On balance, the Keeper Liberty Island in stages between 1901
events that have not yet occurred. Absent any also finds that the post-1957 changes in and 1952.
theme, place, or time in which to place these
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
the landscape and buildings for the In light of the above, the statement
unknown events, there is no possible context district as a whole (Keeper’s emphasis), that ‘‘the entire island is Federally
in which to evaluate their meaning. This do not appear to satisfy the ‘‘exceptional owned’’ (Section 7, page 6) should be
opinion, which I support, is explained in revised. New Jersey’s position has
more detail in Ruth Pierpont’s letter of June
importance’’ threshold embodied in NR
6, 2012. Criterion Exception G for properties that historically been that the portion of the
We would also like to re-state our support have achieved significance within the island that remains within New Jersey’s
of a period of significance for the landscape past fifty years. sovereign jurisdiction is also owned by
elements that extends to include the 1986 NJ SHPO: The NJ SHPO reviewed the the State of New Jersey, as part of its
alterations for the statue’s centennial. The nomination and responded to the FPO ownership of riparian lands in New
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 Sep 13, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM 14SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_43428/page/1.svg)
![43252 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 177 / Thursday, September 14, 2017 / Notices
Jersey. The State of New Jersey has a Park Service has every reasonable basis Dated: August 14, 2017.
long history of selling portions of its to conclude, as New Jersey holds, that J. Paul Loether,
riparian lands at fair market value, to Liberty Island is situated in both states Chief, NR of Historic Places/National Historic
appropriate users, in the form of . . .’’ The Keeper agrees with the NPS Landmarks Program and Keeper, NR of
‘‘riparian grants.’’ The National Park assertion that boundary issues between Historic Places.
Service bought a riparian grant from states are matters of original jurisdiction [FR Doc. 2017–19571 Filed 9–13–17; 8:45 am]
New Jersey in 1904 to legitimize its with the U.S. Supreme Court, and that BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
expansion of Ellis Island, but even neither the Keeper nor the National Park
though New Jersey sought from the Service are fitted by expertise or
1930s to the 1950s to reach agreement authority to pronounce upon them. INTERNATIONAL TRADE
with the Federal government to convey Since the issue regarding jurisdiction COMMISSION
title for the filled portions of Liberty that was raised by the NJ SHPO cannot
Island, no agreement, and therefore no [Investigation No. 337–TA–1055]
be resolved within the context of this
such transfer, was effected. No Federal nomination, the Keeper has determined
purchase of the land has subsequently Certain Mirrors With Internal
that the most appropriate course of Illumination and Components Thereof;
been completed. The Federal
action is to ensure that, as approved by
government has continued to use the Supplemental Notice of Commission
the Keeper, the paragraph under
property without obtaining a riparian Determination Not To Review an Initial
grant. That situation has not changed. ‘‘Setting’’ on page 7–6 reads:
Determination Finding the Sole
As a result, the State of New Jersey’s Liberty Island is located within New York Remaining Respondent in Default;
ownership interest in the land Harbor, one of the world’s busiest shipping Request for Written Submissions on
artificially filled after 1834 was not ports. It is accessed by ferries that run Remedy, the Public Interest, and
extinguished and still remains in effect. regularly from landings at Liberty State Park Bonding
In addition, the further statement that in Jersey City, New Jersey, and Battery Park AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
‘‘the land mass [of Liberty Island] is at the southern tip of Manhattan, New York Commission.
considered part of New York County, City. The island is manifestly flat, with an
ACTION: Notice.
New York.’’ (Section 7, page 6) should average elevation of about 15 feet (ft) above
also be revised. Only the portion of sea level. The landform is approximately a SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
Liberty Island that reflects the island as quarter-mile long and about .15-mile wide at the U.S. International Trade
it existed in 1834 lies within New York its widest point. Two significant filling Commission has determined not to
County, New York. In our previous events, conducted on the west side of the review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
comments on the earlier draft, we island by the US Army during the First (Order No. 10) finding the sole
provided a map that delineated the area World War and on the northwestern end of remaining respondent in default. The
the island’s fill, showing that New the island by the National Park Service in the Commission requests written
Jersey’s territory comprises early 1950s, accreted the island to its current submissions, under the schedule set
approximately 3.4 acres of the island’s 14.1-acre form. Liberty Island is surrounded forth below, on remedy, public interest,
14.1 acres. (see attachment) by New Jersey state waters. The Statue in its and bonding.
New Jersey disagrees with the entirety was constructed and remains within
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
wording of footnote #5 (Section 7, page the territorial jurisdiction of the State of New
6), which has a tendentious effect. The York. The entire island is administered by Clint Gerdine, Office of the General
National Park Service has every the National Park Service. The Statue of Counsel, U.S. International Trade
reasonable basis to conclude, as New Liberty is located on the southern portion of Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Jersey holds, that Liberty Island is Liberty Island and is immediately Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–
situated in both states, and does not surrounded on the east, west, and south sides 708–2310. Copies of non-confidential
need to claim in this footnote that it is by grass lawns. Visitors arrive at the island’s documents filed in connection with this
not pronouncing upon an issue that West Pier after a ferry trip from Manhattan investigation are or will be available for
Section 2 of the document clearly does. or Jersey City and usually walk to the Statue inspection during official business
Your letter cites the 1998 Supreme on the island’s primary circulation system, a hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Court decision in New Jersey v. New wide paved system of malls and plazas that Office of the Secretary, U.S.
York, decided in New Jersey’s favor (a conveys visitors to the main entrance to the International Trade Commission, 500 E
point not mentioned in footnote #5), in Statue. The malls and plazas are lined with Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
which it was held that the portion of linden trees and yew hedges that give the telephone 202–205–2000. General
Ellis Island composed of landfill setting a park-like feel. A secondary information concerning the Commission
emplaced subsequent to the Compact of circulation system consisting of interior may also be obtained by accessing its
1834 has remained in the territory of paths and a perimeter promenade offers other Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
New Jersey since the time of that views of the Statue and New York Harbor The public record for this investigation
compact. With respect to the from a variety of vantage points. Operational may be viewed on the Commission’s
neighboring Liberty Island, the factual facilities such as maintenance buildings and electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
circumstances are nearly identical and staff housing are located primarily in the edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
the same legal reasoning applies that northwest corner of the island and are persons are advised that information on
screened from public view in most this matter can be obtained by
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
formed the basis of the Ellis Island
decision. As a result, the National Park directions. (**NOTE: footnote #5 referenced in contacting the Commission’s TDD
Service should recognize New Jersey the NJ SHPOs comments regarding the above terminal on 202–205–1810.
sovereignty over the western portion of paragraph has been corrected to read as SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
the island. footnote #6 in the final nomination Commission instituted this investigation
Keeper’s response to NJ SHPO document.) on May 8, 2017, based on a complaint
Comment 2 (Concerning Section 7, page Authority: The National Historic filed by Electric Mirror, LLC of Everett,
6): The Keeper disagrees with the NJ Preservation Act of 1966, 54 U.S.C. 302104 Washington (‘‘Electric Mirror’’) and
SHPO’s contention that, ‘‘The National (c)(5)–(6) of; 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60. Kelvin 42 LLC of Pensacola, Florida
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 Sep 13, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM 14SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_43428/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2017-09-13 23:49:37
Document Modified: 2017-09-13 23:49:37
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 43251 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR