82 FR 4337 - General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation; Information Collection; Industrial Funding Fee and Sales Reporting
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 9 (January 13, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 9 (January 13, 2017)
| Page Range | 4337-4339 | |
| FR Document | 2017-00687 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 4337-4339] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-00687] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION [OMB Control No. 3090-0121: Docket No. 2017-0001; Sequence 1] General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation; Information Collection; Industrial Funding Fee and Sales Reporting AGENCY: Office of Acquisition Policy, General Services Administration (GSA). ACTION: Notice of request for comments regarding an extension to an existing OMB clearance. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Regulatory Secretariat Division is submitting a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to review and approve an extension of a previously approved information collection associated with General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation clause 552.238-74, Industrial Funding Fee and Sales Reporting. GSA uses this information to collect the Industrial Funding Fee and administer the Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) program. DATES: Submit comments on or before: March 14, 2017. ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by Information Collection 3090- 0121, Industrial Funding Fee and Sales Reporting, by any of the following methods:Regulations.gov: http://www.regulations.gov. Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching the OMB control number. Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds with ``Information Collection 3090-0121, Industrial Funding Fee and Sales Reporting.'' Follow the instructions provided at the ``Submit a Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if any), and ``Information Collection 3090-0121, Industrial Funding Fee and Sales Reporting'' on your attached document. Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC 20405. ATTN: Ms. Flowers/IC 3090-0121, Industrial Funding Fee and Sales Reporting. Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite Information Collection 3090-0121, Industrial Funding Fee and Sales Reporting, in all correspondence related to this collection. All comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal and/or business confidential information provided. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew McFarland, Senior Policy Advisor, GSA Acquisition Policy Division, at 202-690-9232 or [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. Purpose GSA's Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) program, commonly known as the GSA Schedules program or Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) program provides federal agencies with a simplified process for acquiring commercial supplies and services. The FSS program is the Government's preeminent contracting vehicle, accounting for approximately 10 percent of all federal contract dollars with $33 billion of purchases made through the program in fiscal year 2016. Activities placing orders against a GSA Schedule contract must pay an Industrial Funding Fee (IFF) that reimburses GSA's Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) for the costs of operating the FSS program. FAS recoups its operating costs from ordering activities (i.e., customers) as set forth in 40 U.S.C. 321: Acquisition Services Fund. Net operating revenues generated by the IFF are also applied to fund initiatives benefitting other authorized FAS programs, in accordance with 40 U.S.C. 321. The IFF, currently set at 0.75 percent, is included in the order price, so when a vendor is paid for an FSS order, it is also collecting the IFF. Collection is similar to a state sales tax, where a customer pays the tax due to a merchant, and then the merchant remits the taxes collected to the state government. GSA requires vendors to report their FSS sales each quarter so it can determine the amount of IFF the vendors have collected from customers, and therefore must remit to GSA. However, GSA also uses this information for other purposes, including budgeting, determining whether vendors have met the minimum sales requirement,\1\ evaluating the program's performance, and monitoring small business participation. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The FSS Contract Sales Criteria clause requires vendors to have at least $25,000 in sales over the first two years of a contract and then $25,000/year in sales for each year thereafter. Vendors that have not satisfied the minimum sales requirement are subject to cancellation in accordance with GSAR clause 552.238-73 Cancellation. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vendor reporting and remittance requirements are set forth in General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) clause 552.238-74, Industrial Funding Fee and Sales Reporting, or Alternate I of that clause. While both clause versions govern how the IFF is calculated and remitted, the reporting requirements differ between the basic version and Alternate I: Clause 552.238-75: Basic Version: This version requires vendors to report their FSS contract sales to GSA once a quarter. GSA then calculates the IFF due based on the total amount of sales reported, and the vendor must remit that amount within 30 days after the end of the quarter. The basic version of the clause applies to approximately 72 percent of GSA Schedule contracts. Clause 552.238-75: Alternate I: While the basic version requires vendors to report their total FSS sales each quarter, Alternate I requires vendors to report the transactional data generated from orders each month. GSA then calculates the IFF due based on the transactional data reported, and the vendor must remit that amount within 30 days after the end of the quarter. Alternate I of the clause applies to FSS contracts participating in the Transactional Data Reporting pilot. The pilot commenced on June 23, 2016 and will run for at least a year before substantial changes are considered. Approximately 28 percent of GSA Schedule contracts are eligible to participate in the pilot. Since the reporting requirements vary by the two versions of clause 552.238-74, separate Paperwork Reduction Act information collections have been established for each version. The information collection associated with OMB control number 3090-0306, which expires on 8/31/ 2019, applies to Alternate I. This information collection (OMB control number 3090-0121) applies to the basic version of the clause. Information Collection Changes and Updates The population of vendors subject to this information collection is smaller than the previous version, as FSS contracts eligible to participate in the Transactional Data Reporting pilot [[Page 4338]] (approximately 28 percent of all GSA Schedule contracts) are now included under OMB control number 3090-0306. Previous justifications for this information collection limited the burden to the amount of time needed for vendors to input sales data in the 72A Reporting System and remit IFF payments. However, GSA now recognizes recordkeeping, quality assurance, reporting, and remittance should be included in the burden estimates. Since recordkeeping and quality assurance are the largest burden drivers for both vendors and the Government, the burden estimates for both the public and Government have increased. B. Annual Reporting Burden Population Overview: The basic version of clause 552.238-74 is included in 14,306 contracts held by 12,254 vendors. This includes 1,128 new contracts awarded to 819 vendors.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ These are approximations based on FY2015 data. The number of vendors equals the number of unique Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) numbers, which are assigned to business entities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cost Estimates: The estimated cost burden for respondents was calculated by multiplying the burden hours by an estimated cost of $68/ hour ($50/hour with a 36% overhead rate).\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ The 36% overhead rate was used in reference Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-76. Circular A-76 requires agencies to use standard cost factors to estimate certain costs of government performance. These cost factors ensure that specific government costs are calculated in a standard and consistent manner to reasonably reflect the cost of performing commercial activities with government personnel. The standard cost factor for fringe benefits is 36.25%; GSA opted to round to the nearest whole number for the basis of its burden estimates. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Categorization of Vendors by Quarterly Sales Revenue: Sales reporting imposes a progressive burden -- one that increases with a vendor's sales volume. Quarterly reporting times will increase with a vendor's applicable sales volume, as vendors with lower to no reportable sales will spend little time on quarterly reporting, while those with more reportable sales with face a higher reporting burden. GSA separated vendors into categories based on average quarterly sales volume \4\ in order to account for the differences in reporting burden. These categories are: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ Average quarterly sales volume was computed by taking a vendor's total annual sales volume and dividing it by 4. All sales data is from FY2015. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Category 1: No sales activity (average quarterly sales of $0) Category 2: Average quarterly sales between $0 and $60,000 Category 3: Average quarterly sales between $60,000 and $600,000 Category 4: Average quarterly sales between $600,000 and $3 million Category 5: Average quarterly sales over $3 million The distribution of vendors by sales category is as follows: FSS and Vendors by Sales Category ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FSS vendors FSS vendors (count) (percentage) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Category 1.................................................... 4,217 34 Category 2.................................................... 4,020 33 Category 3.................................................... 2,768 23 Category 4.................................................... 970 8 Category 5.................................................... 279 2 ------------------------------------------------- Total..................................................... 12,254 100.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Automated vs. Manual Reporting Systems: Vendors subject to these clauses must create systems or processes to produce and report accurate data. Generally, vendors will use automated or manual systems to identify the quarter's reportable sales. An automated system is one that relies on information technology, such as an accounting system or data management software, to identify and compile reportable data. These systems can tremendously streamline the reporting process but require upfront configuration to perform the tasks, such as coding the sales types to be retrieved. Conversely, a manual system is one that incorporates little to no automation and instead relies on personnel to manually identify and compile the reportable data. An example of a manual system would be an accountant reviewing invoices to identify the reportable data and then transferring the findings to a spreadsheet. In contrast to automation, a manual system requires relatively little setup time but the reporting effort will generally increase with the vendor's sales volume. The likelihood of a vendor adopting an automated system increases with their applicable sales volume. Vendors with little to no reportable data are unlikely to expend the effort needed to establish an automated reporting system since it will be relatively easy to identify and report a limited amount of data. In fiscal year 2015, 34 percent of FSS vendors subject to this collection reported $0 sales, while another 33 percent reported average quarterly sales between $1 and $60,000 per quarter. However, as a vendor's applicable average quarterly sales increase, they will be increasingly likely to establish an automated system to reduce the quarterly reporting burden. Consequently, vendors with higher reportable sales will likely bear a higher setup burden to create an automated system, or absorb a high quarterly reporting burden if they choose to rely on manual reporting methods. The following chart depicts the likelihood of the population of vendors adopting manual and automated reporting systems: Vendors by Reporting System Type (Manual vs. Automated) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Manual system (vendor Automated system Manual system (vendor Automated system percentage) (vendor percentage) count) (vendor count) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Category 1.......................................... 100 0 4,217 0 Category 2.......................................... 100 0 4,020 0 [[Page 4339]] Category 3.......................................... 90 10 2,491 277 Category 4.......................................... 50 50 485 485 Category 5.......................................... 10 90 28 251 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Vendor Count by System Type 11,241 1,013 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vendor Percentage by System Type 92 8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Initial Setup: Vendors with active FSS contracts already have procedures in place to meet these longstanding reporting requirements. However, new FSS vendors will absorb a one-time setup burden to establish reporting systems. The estimated setup time varies between automated and manual reporting systems. Vendors implementing a manual system must acclimate themselves with the new reporting requirements and train their staff as accordingly, while those with automated systems must perform these tasks in addition to configuring information technology resources. GSA is attributing the setup burden by vendor, not by contracts, because a vendor holding multiple contracts subject to this rule will likely use a single reporting system. GSA estimates the average one-time setup burden is 8 hours for vendors with a manual system and 40 hours for those with an automated system. GSA also attributes the same system type probabilities (manual system 92%, automated system 8%) to the population of new vendors. These estimates apply to the 819 vendors awarded FSS contracts in fiscal year 2015. Quarterly Reporting: Vendors are required to report sales within 30 calendar days after the end of each quarter. The average reporting times vary by system type (manual or automated) and by sales categories. GSA estimates vendors using a manual system will have average quarterly reporting times ranging from 15 minutes (0.25 hours) per quarter for vendors with $0 sales, to an average of 8 hours per quarter for vendors with quarterly sales over $3 million. On the other hand, GSA projects vendors with automated systems will have reporting times of 2 hours per quarter, irrespective of quarterly sales volume, as a result of efficiencies achieved through automated processes. The following table shows GSA's projected quarterly reporting times per sales category and system type. Quarterly Reporting Hours by System Type and Category ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Manual Automated systems systems ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Category 1.............................. 0.25 2.00 Category 2.............................. 1.00 2.00 Category 3.............................. 2.00 2.00 Category 4.............................. 4.00 2.00 Category 5.............................. 8.00 2.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Annualized Public Burden Estimates The burden estimates consist of quarterly reporting times for all 12,254 participating vendors and a one-time setup burden for the 819 new vendors: Quarterly Reporting Annual Burden (Hours): 56,983. Annual Burden (Cost): $3,874,817. Initial Setup Annual Burden (Hours): 8,718. Annual Burden (Cost): $592,846. Total Information Collection Burden Number of Respondents: 12,254. Response per Respondent: 4. Total Annual Responses: 49, 016. Hours Per Response: 1.3404. Total Burden (Hours): 65,701. Annual Burden (Cost): $4,467,663. C. Public Comments Public comments are particularly invited on: Whether this collection of information is necessary and whether it will have practical utility; whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection of information is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected. Obtaining Copies of Proposals: Requesters may obtain a copy of the information collection documents from the General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC 20405, telephone 202-501-4755. Please cite OMB Control No. 3090-0235, Price Reductions Clause, in all correspondence. Jeffrey A. Koses, Director, Office of Acquisition Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy. [FR Doc. 2017-00687 Filed 1-12-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820-61-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices 4337
Barta, Fremont, Nebraska, and Walter • Mail: General Services minimum sales requirement,1
Hoff, Atlanta, Georgia, as members of Administration, Regulatory Secretariat evaluating the program’s performance,
the Barta/Hoff Group acting in concert; Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW., and monitoring small business
to acquire voting shares of Woodstock Washington, DC 20405. ATTN: Ms. participation.
Land and Cattle Company, and thereby Flowers/IC 3090–0121, Industrial Vendor reporting and remittance
control Fullerton National Bank, both of Funding Fee and Sales Reporting. requirements are set forth in General
Fullerton, Nebraska. Instructions: Please submit comments Services Administration Acquisition
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve only and cite Information Collection Regulation (GSAR) clause 552.238–74,
System, January 10, 2017. 3090–0121, Industrial Funding Fee and Industrial Funding Fee and Sales
Yao-Chin Chao, Sales Reporting, in all correspondence Reporting, or Alternate I of that clause.
related to this collection. All comments While both clause versions govern how
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
received will be posted without change the IFF is calculated and remitted, the
[FR Doc. 2017–00711 Filed 1–12–17; 8:45 am]
to http://www.regulations.gov, including reporting requirements differ between
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P the basic version and Alternate I:
any personal and/or business
confidential information provided. Clause 552.238–75: Basic Version:
This version requires vendors to report
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: their FSS contract sales to GSA once a
GENERAL SERVICES
Matthew McFarland, Senior Policy quarter. GSA then calculates the IFF due
ADMINISTRATION
Advisor, GSA Acquisition Policy based on the total amount of sales
[OMB Control No. 3090–0121: Docket No. Division, at 202–690–9232 or reported, and the vendor must remit
2017–0001; Sequence 1] matthew.mcfarland@gsa.gov. that amount within 30 days after the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: end of the quarter. The basic version of
General Services Administration
the clause applies to approximately 72
Acquisition Regulation; Information A. Purpose
percent of GSA Schedule contracts.
Collection; Industrial Funding Fee and
GSA’s Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) Clause 552.238–75: Alternate I: While
Sales Reporting
program, commonly known as the GSA the basic version requires vendors to
AGENCY: Office of Acquisition Policy, Schedules program or Multiple Award report their total FSS sales each quarter,
General Services Administration (GSA). Schedule (MAS) program provides Alternate I requires vendors to report
ACTION: Notice of request for comments federal agencies with a simplified the transactional data generated from
regarding an extension to an existing process for acquiring commercial orders each month. GSA then calculates
OMB clearance. supplies and services. The FSS program the IFF due based on the transactional
is the Government’s preeminent data reported, and the vendor must
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the contracting vehicle, accounting for remit that amount within 30 days after
Paperwork Reduction Act, the approximately 10 percent of all federal the end of the quarter. Alternate I of the
Regulatory Secretariat Division is contract dollars with $33 billion of clause applies to FSS contracts
submitting a request to the Office of purchases made through the program in participating in the Transactional Data
Management and Budget (OMB) to fiscal year 2016. Reporting pilot. The pilot commenced
review and approve an extension of a Activities placing orders against a on June 23, 2016 and will run for at
previously approved information GSA Schedule contract must pay an least a year before substantial changes
collection associated with General Industrial Funding Fee (IFF) that are considered. Approximately 28
Services Administration Acquisition reimburses GSA’s Federal Acquisition percent of GSA Schedule contracts are
Regulation clause 552.238–74, Service (FAS) for the costs of operating eligible to participate in the pilot.
Industrial Funding Fee and Sales the FSS program. FAS recoups its Since the reporting requirements vary
Reporting. GSA uses this information to operating costs from ordering activities by the two versions of clause 552.238–
collect the Industrial Funding Fee and (i.e., customers) as set forth in 40 U.S.C. 74, separate Paperwork Reduction Act
administer the Federal Supply Schedule 321: Acquisition Services Fund. Net information collections have been
(FSS) program. operating revenues generated by the IFF established for each version. The
DATES: Submit comments on or before: are also applied to fund initiatives information collection associated with
March 14, 2017. benefitting other authorized FAS OMB control number 3090–0306, which
programs, in accordance with 40 U.S.C. expires on 8/31/2019, applies to
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
321. The IFF, currently set at 0.75 Alternate I. This information collection
identified by Information Collection (OMB control number 3090–0121)
3090–0121, Industrial Funding Fee and percent, is included in the order price,
so when a vendor is paid for an FSS applies to the basic version of the
Sales Reporting, by any of the following clause.
methods: order, it is also collecting the IFF.
• Regulations.gov: http:// Collection is similar to a state sales tax, Information Collection Changes and
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments where a customer pays the tax due to a Updates
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by merchant, and then the merchant remits
the taxes collected to the state • The population of vendors subject
searching the OMB control number. to this information collection is smaller
Select the link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ government.
than the previous version, as FSS
that corresponds with ‘‘Information GSA requires vendors to report their
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
contracts eligible to participate in the
Collection 3090–0121, Industrial FSS sales each quarter so it can Transactional Data Reporting pilot
Funding Fee and Sales Reporting.’’ determine the amount of IFF the
Follow the instructions provided at the vendors have collected from customers, 1 The FSS Contract Sales Criteria clause requires
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ screen. Please and therefore must remit to GSA. vendors to have at least $25,000 in sales over the
include your name, company name (if However, GSA also uses this first two years of a contract and then $25,000/year
information for other purposes, in sales for each year thereafter. Vendors that have
any), and ‘‘Information Collection 3090– not satisfied the minimum sales requirement are
0121, Industrial Funding Fee and Sales including budgeting, determining subject to cancellation in accordance with GSAR
Reporting’’ on your attached document. whether vendors have met the clause 552.238–73 Cancellation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:06 Jan 12, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM 13JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_4346/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices 4339
VENDORS BY REPORTING SYSTEM TYPE—Continued
(Manual vs. Automated)
Manual system Automated system Manual system Automated system
(vendor percentage) (vendor percentage) (vendor count) (vendor count)
Category 3 ....................................... 90 10 2,491 277
Category 4 ....................................... 50 50 485 485
Category 5 ....................................... 10 90 28 251
Total Vendor Count by System Type 11,241 1,013
Vendor Percentage by System Type 92 8
Initial Setup: Vendors with active FSS vendor holding multiple contracts automated) and by sales categories. GSA
contracts already have procedures in subject to this rule will likely use a estimates vendors using a manual
place to meet these longstanding single reporting system. system will have average quarterly
reporting requirements. However, new GSA estimates the average one-time reporting times ranging from 15 minutes
FSS vendors will absorb a one-time setup burden is 8 hours for vendors (0.25 hours) per quarter for vendors
setup burden to establish reporting with a manual system and 40 hours for with $0 sales, to an average of 8 hours
systems. The estimated setup time those with an automated system. GSA per quarter for vendors with quarterly
varies between automated and manual also attributes the same system type sales over $3 million. On the other
reporting systems. Vendors probabilities (manual system 92%, hand, GSA projects vendors with
implementing a manual system must automated system 8%) to the population
automated systems will have reporting
acclimate themselves with the new of new vendors. These estimates apply
times of 2 hours per quarter, irrespective
reporting requirements and train their to the 819 vendors awarded FSS
staff as accordingly, while those with of quarterly sales volume, as a result of
contracts in fiscal year 2015.
automated systems must perform these Quarterly Reporting: Vendors are efficiencies achieved through automated
tasks in addition to configuring required to report sales within 30 processes. The following table shows
information technology resources. GSA calendar days after the end of each GSA’s projected quarterly reporting
is attributing the setup burden by quarter. The average reporting times times per sales category and system
vendor, not by contracts, because a vary by system type (manual or type.
QUARTERLY REPORTING HOURS BY SYSTEM TYPE AND CATEGORY
Manual Automated
systems systems
Category 1 ............................................................................................................................................................... 0.25 2.00
Category 2 ............................................................................................................................................................... 1.00 2.00
Category 3 ............................................................................................................................................................... 2.00 2.00
Category 4 ............................................................................................................................................................... 4.00 2.00
Category 5 ............................................................................................................................................................... 8.00 2.00
Annualized Public Burden Estimates will have practical utility; whether our DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
The burden estimates consist of estimate of the public burden of this HUMAN SERVICES
quarterly reporting times for all 12,254 collection of information is accurate,
participating vendors and a one-time and based on valid assumptions and Centers for Disease Control and
setup burden for the 819 new vendors: methodology; ways to enhance the Prevention
quality, utility, and clarity of the
Quarterly Reporting information to be collected. [30Day–17–16BGH]
Annual Burden (Hours): 56,983. Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Annual Burden (Cost): $3,874,817. Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Requesters may obtain a copy of the Reduction Act Review
Initial Setup information collection documents from
the General Services Administration, The Centers for Disease Control and
Annual Burden (Hours): 8,718. Prevention (CDC) has submitted the
Annual Burden (Cost): $592,846. Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB),
following information collection request
1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC
Total Information Collection Burden to the Office of Management and Budget
20405, telephone 202–501–4755. Please (OMB) for review and approval in
Number of Respondents: 12,254. cite OMB Control No. 3090–0235, Price
Response per Respondent: 4. accordance with the Paperwork
Reductions Clause, in all Reduction Act of 1995. The notice for
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Total Annual Responses: 49, 016. correspondence.
Hours Per Response: 1.3404. the proposed information collection is
Total Burden (Hours): 65,701. Jeffrey A. Koses, published to obtain comments from the
Annual Burden (Cost): $4,467,663. Director, Office of Acquisition Policy, Office
public and affected agencies.
of Government-wide Policy. Written comments and suggestions
C. Public Comments from the public and affected agencies
[FR Doc. 2017–00687 Filed 1–12–17; 8:45 am]
Public comments are particularly concerning the proposed collection of
BILLING CODE 6820–61–P
invited on: Whether this collection of information are encouraged. Your
information is necessary and whether it comments should address any of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:06 Jan 12, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM 13JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_4346/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-01-13 02:45:22
Document Modified: 2017-01-13 02:45:22
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice of request for comments regarding an extension to an existing OMB clearance. | |
| Dates | Submit comments on or before: March 14, 2017. | |
| Contact | Matthew McFarland, Senior Policy Advisor, GSA Acquisition Policy Division, at 202-690-9232 or [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 4337 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR