82 FR 44075 - Safety Zone; Weskeag River, South Thomaston, ME
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 182 (September 21, 2017)
Coast Guard
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 182 (September 21, 2017)
| Page Range | 44075-44077 | |
| FR Document | 2017-20068 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 182 (Thursday, September 21, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 44075-44077] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-20068] [[Page 44075]] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket Number USCG-2017-0791] RIN 1625-AA00 Safety Zone; Weskeag River, South Thomaston, ME AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Temporary final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for the navigable waters within 50-yards of either side of the Route 73 Weskeag Bridge, at mile 0.1 on the Weskeag River, in South Thomaston, Maine. The safety zone is necessary to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from the potential hazards created by the demolition, subsequent removal, and replacement of the Route 73 Weskeag Bridge. When enforced, this regulation prohibits entry of vessels or people into the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP), Sector Northern New England or a designated representative. DATES: This rule is effective from October 1, 2017 through December 1, 2017. ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG- 2017-0791 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, call or email LT Matthew Odom, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Northern New England, telephone 207-347-5015, email [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations COTP Captain of the Port DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking Sec. Section U.S.C. United States Code II. Background Information and Regulatory History On July 27, 2017, Sector Northern New England was made aware of the Route 73 Weskeag Bridge replacement project, which spans the Weskeag River in South Thomaston, Maine. The COTP Sector Northern New England has determined that the potential hazards associated with the bridge replacement project will be a safety concern for anyone within the work area. The project is scheduled to begin on October 1, 2017 and be completed by December 1, 2017. During this project, removal and replacement of the bridge will take place. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The safety zone will be enforced during different periods during the bridge demolition or when other hazards to navigation arise during the new bridge construction. The Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via marine channel 16 (VHF-FM) 24 hours in advance to any period of enforcement or as soon as practicable in response to an emergency. If the project is completed prior to December 1, 2017, enforcement of the safety zone will be suspended and notice given via Broadcast Notice to Mariners. The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing an NPRM with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest. The late finalization of project details did not give the Coast Guard enough time to publish an NPRM, take public comments, and issue a final rule before the construction work is set to begin. It would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest to delay promulgating this rule as it is necessary to respond to the potential safety hazards associated with the bridge replacement project beginning on October 1, 2017. We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. For reasons stated in the preceding paragraph, delaying the implementation of this rule would be impractical. III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule The legal basis for this temporary rule is 33 U.S.C. 1231. The COTP Sector Northern New England has determined that potential hazards associated with the bridge replacement project starting on October 1, 2017 and continuing through December 1, 2017 will be a safety concern for anyone within the work zone. This rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment within the safety zone while the bridge replacement project is completed. IV. Discussion of the Rule This rule establishes a safety zone from October 1, 2017 through December 1, 2017. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters from surface to bottom of 50 yards to either side of the Weskeag Bridge. The duration of the zone is intended to protect people, vessels, and the marine environment in these navigable waters during the bridge replacement project. When enforced, no vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The Coast Guard will notify the public and local mariners of this safety zone through appropriate means, which may include, but are not limited to, publication in the Federal Register, the Local Notice to Mariners, and Broadcast Notice to Mariners via marine Channel 16 (VHF- FM) in advance of any scheduled enforcement period. The regulatory text we are enforcing appears at the end of this document. V. Regulatory Analyses We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt from the requirements of Executive order 13771. The Coast Guard has determined that this rulemaking is not a significant regulatory action for the following reasons: (1) The safety zone only [[Page 44076]] impacts a small designated area of the Weskeag River, (2) the zone will only be enforced when work equipment will be placed in the navigable channel during removal and replacement of the bridge or if necessitated by an emergency, (3) persons or vessels desiring to enter the safety zone may do so with permission from the COTP Sector Northern New England or a designated representative. The Coast Guard will notify the public of the enforcement of this rule via appropriate means, such as via Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners. B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A., this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a temporary safety zone that will prohibit entry within 50 yards of the Weskeag Bridge during its removal and replacement. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. A Record of Environmental Consideration for Categorically Excluded Actions will be available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 0 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04- 1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 0 2. Add Sec. 165.T01-0791 to read as follows: Sec. 165.T01-0791 Safety Zone--Route 73 Weskeag Bridge, Weskeag River, South Thomaston, ME. (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone. All navigable waters of the Weskeag River, ME within a 50-yard radius of the Route 73 Weskeag Bridge that spans the Weskeag River in South Thomaston, ME in position 44[deg]03'06'' N, 069[deg]07'33'' W (NAD 83). (b) Effective and enforcement period. This rule will be effective on October 1, 2017, through December 1, 2017, but will only be enforced during removal and replacement of the Route 73 Weskeag Bridge or other instances which may cause a hazard to navigation, when deemed necessary by the Captain of the Port (COTP), Northern New England. (c) Regulations. When this safety zone is enforced, the following regulations, along with those contained in Sec. 165.23 apply: (1) No person or vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone without the permission of the Captain of the Port [[Page 44077]] (COTP) or a COTP representative. However, any vessel that is granted permission by the COTP or a COTP representative must proceed through the area with caution and operate at a speed no faster than that speed necessary to maintain a safe course, unless otherwise required by the Navigation Rules. (2) Any person or vessel permitted to enter the safety zone shall comply with the directions and orders of the COTP or a COTP representative. Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing lights, or other means, the operator of a vessel within the zone shall proceed as directed. Any person or vessel within the safety zone shall exit the zone when directed by the COTP or a COTP representative. (3) To obtain permissions required by this regulation, individuals may reach the COTP or a COTP representative via Channel 16 (VHF-FM) or (207) 741-5465 (Sector Northern New England Command Center). (d) Penalties. Those who violate this section are subject to the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232. (e) Notification. Coast Guard Sector Northern New England will give notice through the Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners for the purpose of enforcement of temporary safety zone. Sector Northern New England will also notify the public to the greatest extent possible of any period in which the Coast Guard will suspend enforcement of this safety zone. (f) COTP representative. A COTP representative may be any Coast Guard commissioned, or petty officer or any federal, state, or local law enforcement officer who has been designated by the COTP to act on the COTP's behalf. A COTP representative may be on a Coast Guard vessel, a Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel, a state or local law enforcement vessel, or a location on shore. Dated: September 15, 2017. M.A. Baroody, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Northern New England. [FR Doc. 2017-20068 Filed 9-20-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 182 / Thursday, September 21, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 44075
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND Sector Northern New England has that potential hazards associated with
SECURITY determined that the potential hazards the bridge replacement project starting
associated with the bridge replacement on October 1, 2017 and continuing
Coast Guard project will be a safety concern for through December 1, 2017 will be a
anyone within the work area. safety concern for anyone within the
33 CFR Part 165 The project is scheduled to begin on work zone. This rule is needed to
October 1, 2017 and be completed by protect personnel, vessels, and the
[Docket Number USCG–2017–0791]
December 1, 2017. During this project, marine environment within the safety
RIN 1625–AA00 removal and replacement of the bridge zone while the bridge replacement
will take place. No vessel or person will project is completed.
Safety Zone; Weskeag River, South be permitted to enter the safety zone
Thomaston, ME without obtaining permission from the IV. Discussion of the Rule
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. COTP or a designated representative. This rule establishes a safety zone
The safety zone will be enforced during from October 1, 2017 through December
ACTION: Temporary final rule. different periods during the bridge 1, 2017. The safety zone will cover all
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is demolition or when other hazards to navigable waters from surface to bottom
establishing a temporary safety zone for navigation arise during the new bridge of 50 yards to either side of the Weskeag
the navigable waters within 50-yards of construction. The Coast Guard will Bridge. The duration of the zone is
either side of the Route 73 Weskeag issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via intended to protect people, vessels, and
Bridge, at mile 0.1 on the Weskeag marine channel 16 (VHF–FM) 24 hours the marine environment in these
River, in South Thomaston, Maine. The in advance to any period of enforcement navigable waters during the bridge
safety zone is necessary to protect or as soon as practicable in response to replacement project. When enforced, no
personnel, vessels, and the marine an emergency. If the project is vessel or person will be permitted to
environment from the potential hazards completed prior to December 1, 2017, enter the safety zone without obtaining
created by the demolition, subsequent enforcement of the safety zone will be permission from the COTP or a
removal, and replacement of the Route suspended and notice given via designated representative.
73 Weskeag Bridge. When enforced, this Broadcast Notice to Mariners. The Coast Guard will notify the
The Coast Guard is issuing this public and local mariners of this safety
regulation prohibits entry of vessels or
temporary final rule without prior zone through appropriate means, which
people into the safety zone unless
notice and opportunity to comment may include, but are not limited to,
authorized by the Captain of the Port
pursuant to authority under section 4(a) publication in the Federal Register, the
(COTP), Sector Northern New England
of the Administrative Procedure Act Local Notice to Mariners, and Broadcast
or a designated representative.
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision Notice to Mariners via marine Channel
DATES: This rule is effective from authorizes an agency to issue a rule 16 (VHF–FM) in advance of any
October 1, 2017 through December 1, without prior notice and opportunity to scheduled enforcement period. The
2017. comment when the agency for good regulatory text we are enforcing appears
ADDRESSES: To view documents cause finds that those procedures are at the end of this document.
mentioned in this preamble as being ‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. V. Regulatory Analyses
available in the docket, go to http://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2017– 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that We developed this rule after
0791 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click good cause exists for not publishing an considering numerous statutes and
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket NPRM with respect to this rule because Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Folder on the line associated with this doing so would be impracticable and Below we summarize our analyses
rule. contrary to the public interest. The late based on a number of these statutes and
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If finalization of project details did not Executive orders, and we discuss First
you have questions on this rule, call or give the Coast Guard enough time to Amendment rights of protestors.
email LT Matthew Odom, Waterways publish an NPRM, take public
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard comments, and issue a final rule before
the construction work is set to begin. It Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Sector Northern New England,
would be impracticable and contrary to direct agencies to assess the costs and
telephone 207–347–5015, email
the public interest to delay benefits of available regulatory
Matthew.T.Odom@uscg.mil.
promulgating this rule as it is necessary alternatives and, if regulation is
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: necessary, to select regulatory
to respond to the potential safety
I. Table of Abbreviations hazards associated with the bridge approaches that maximize net benefits.
replacement project beginning on Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
CFR Code of Federal Regulations to control regulatory costs through a
COTP Captain of the Port October 1, 2017.
DHS Department of Homeland Security We are issuing this rule, and under 5 budgeting process. This rule has not
FR Federal Register U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds been designated a ‘‘significant
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking that good cause exists for making it regulatory action,’’ under Executive
§ Section effective less than 30 days after Order 12866. Accordingly, it has not
U.S.C. United States Code publication in the Federal Register. For been reviewed by the Office of
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES
reasons stated in the preceding Management and Budget (OMB), and
II. Background Information and
paragraph, delaying the implementation pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
Regulatory History
of this rule would be impractical. from the requirements of Executive
On July 27, 2017, Sector Northern order 13771.
New England was made aware of the III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule The Coast Guard has determined that
Route 73 Weskeag Bridge replacement The legal basis for this temporary rule this rulemaking is not a significant
project, which spans the Weskeag River is 33 U.S.C. 1231. The COTP Sector regulatory action for the following
in South Thomaston, Maine. The COTP Northern New England has determined reasons: (1) The safety zone only
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Sep 20, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM 21SER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_44257/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 182 / Thursday, September 21, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 44077
(COTP) or a COTP representative. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND enforcement of the safety zone. During
However, any vessel that is granted SECURITY the comment period that ended
permission by the COTP or a COTP September 7, 2017, we received one
representative must proceed through the Coast Guard comment.
area with caution and operate at a speed III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
no faster than that speed necessary to 33 CFR Part 165
maintain a safe course, unless otherwise The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
[Docket Number USCG–2017–0731] under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The
required by the Navigation Rules.
RIN 1625–AA00 Captain of the Port Sector New Orleans
(2) Any person or vessel permitted to (COTP) has determined that potential
enter the safety zone shall comply with Safety Zone; Mississippi River, New hazards associated with the fireworks
the directions and orders of the COTP Orleans, LA display from 7:50 p.m. to 8:50 p.m. on
or a COTP representative. Upon being October 28, 2017 will present a safety
hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. concern for all navigable waters on the
siren, radio, flashing lights, or other ACTION: Final rule. Mississippi River from mile marker
means, the operator of a vessel within (MM) 96.0 and MM 96.5. The purpose
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
the zone shall proceed as directed. Any of this rule is to ensure safety of life and
establishing a temporary safety zone for
person or vessel within the safety zone vessels on the navigable waters in the
all navigable waters on the Mississippi
shall exit the zone when directed by the safety zone before, during, and after the
River between mile marker (MM) 96.0
COTP or a COTP representative. scheduled event.
and MM 96.5. This action is necessary
(3) To obtain permissions required by to provide for the safety of life on these IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
this regulation, individuals may reach navigable waters near New Orleans, LA, and the Rule
the COTP or a COTP representative via during a fireworks display. Entry of During the comment period, one
Channel 16 (VHF–FM) or (207) 741– vessels or persons into this safety zone comment was received. The commenter
5465 (Sector Northern New England is prohibited unless authorized by the made a general statement that he or she
Command Center). Captain of the Port Sector New Orleans was against ‘‘safe spaces’’. The
(COTP) or a designated representative. commenter did not indicate if he or she
(d) Penalties. Those who violate this
DATES: This rule is effective from 7:50 was against the proposed safety zone or
section are subject to the penalties set
forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232. p.m. to 8:50 p.m. on October 28, 2017. the reasons for it. There are no changes
ADDRESSES: To view documents in the regulatory text of this rule from
(e) Notification. Coast Guard Sector mentioned in this preamble as being the proposed rule in the NPRM.
Northern New England will give notice available in the docket, go to http:// The rule establishes a safety zone
through the Local Notice to Mariners www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2017– from 7:50 p.m. through 8:50 p.m. on
and Broadcast Notice to Mariners for the 0731 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click October 28, 2017. The safety zone
purpose of enforcement of temporary ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket would cover all navigable waters
safety zone. Sector Northern New Folder on the line associated with this between MM 96.0 and 96.5 on the
England will also notify the public to rule. Mississippi River in New Orleans, LA.
the greatest extent possible of any FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If The duration of the zone is intended to
period in which the Coast Guard will you have questions about this proposed ensure the safety of life and vessels on
suspend enforcement of this safety zone. rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant these navigable waters before, during,
(f) COTP representative. A COTP Commander (LCDR) Howard Vacco, and after the scheduled fireworks
representative may be any Coast Guard Sector New Orleans, U.S. Coast Guard; display. Entry into this safety zone is
at (504) 365–2281, email prohibited without obtaining
commissioned, or petty officer or any
Howard.K.Vacco@uscg.mil. permission from the COTP or a
federal, state, or local law enforcement
designated representative.
officer who has been designated by the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
COTP to act on the COTP’s behalf. A V. Regulatory Analyses
I. Table of Abbreviations
COTP representative may be on a Coast We developed this rule after
Guard vessel, a Coast Guard Auxiliary CFR Code of Federal Regulations considering numerous statutes and
vessel, a state or local law enforcement COTP Captain of the Port Sector New
Orleans
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
vessel, or a location on shore. DHS Department of Homeland Security Below we summarize our analyses
Dated: September 15, 2017. FR Federal Register based on a number of these statutes and
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking Executive orders, and we discuss First
M.A. Baroody,
§ Section Amendment rights of protestors.
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the U.S.C. United States Code
Port, Sector Northern New England. A. Regulatory Planning and Review
[FR Doc. 2017–20068 Filed 9–20–17; 8:45 am] II. Background Information and Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Regulatory History direct agencies to assess the costs and
The Coast Guard preceded this final benefits of available regulatory
rule with a Notice of Proposed alternatives and, if regulation is
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES
Rulemaking (NPRM). The NPRM was necessary, to select regulatory
published in the Federal Register on approaches that maximize net benefits.
August 23, 2017, (82 FR 39972). We Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
invited comments on our proposed to control regulatory costs through a
regulatory action related to work on budgeting process. This rule has not
power lines extending over the been designated a ‘‘significant
Mississippi River in New Orleans, LA. regulatory action,’’ under Executive
The NPRM listed dates and times of Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Sep 20, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\21SER1.SGM 21SER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_44257/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-10-24 14:33:34
Document Modified: 2018-10-24 14:33:34
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Temporary final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective from October 1, 2017 through December 1, 2017. | |
| Contact | If you have questions on this rule, call or email LT Matthew Odom, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Northern New England, telephone 207-347-5015, email [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 44075 | |
| RIN Number | 1625-AA00 | |
| CFR Associated | Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (Water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR