82 FR 44124 - Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)-024 CBP Intelligence Records System (CIRS) System of Records
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Office of the Secretary Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 182 (September 21, 2017)
Office of the Secretary
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 182 (September 21, 2017)
| Page Range | 44124-44126 | |
| FR Document | 2017-19717 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 182 (Thursday, September 21, 2017)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 44124-44126] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-19717] ======================================================================== Proposed Rules Federal Register ________________________________________________________________________ This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules. ======================================================================== Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 182 / Thursday, September 21, 2017 / Proposed Rules [[Page 44124]] DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Office of the Secretary 6 CFR Part 5 [Docket No. DHS 2017-0026] Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)-024 CBP Intelligence Records System (CIRS) System of Records AGENCY: Department of Homeland Security, Privacy Office. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security is giving concurrent notice of a newly established system of records pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 for the ``Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)-024 CBP Intelligence Records System (CIRS) System of Records'' and this proposed rulemaking. In this proposed rulemaking, the Department proposes to exempt portions of the system of records from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and administrative enforcement requirements. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 23, 2017. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number DHS 2017-0026, by one of the following methods:Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Fax: 202-343-4010. Mail: Jonathan R. Cantor, Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number for this notice. All comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions please contact: Debra L. Danisek (202) 344-1610, Privacy Officer, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20229. For privacy issues please contact: Jonathan R. Cantor, (202) 343-1717, Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) proposes to concurrently establish a new DHS system of records titled, ``DHS/CBP-024 CBP Intelligence Records System (CIRS) System of Records'' and this notice of proposed rulemaking to exempt portions of the system of records from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and administrative enforcement requirements. The CIRS system of records is owned by CBP's Office of Intelligence (OI). CIRS contains information collected by CBP to support CBP's law enforcement intelligence mission. This information includes raw intelligence information collected by CBP's OI, public source information, and information initially collected by CBP pursuant to its immigration and customs authorities. This information is analyzed and incorporated into intelligence products. CBP currently uses the Analytical Framework for Intelligence (AFI) and the Intelligence Reporting System (IRS) information technology (IT) systems to facilitate the development of finished intelligence products. These products are disseminated to various stakeholders including CBP executive management, CBP operational units, various government agencies, and the Intelligence Community. Information collected by CBP for an intelligence purpose that is not covered by an existing DHS System of Records Notice (SORN) and is not incorporated into a finished intelligence product is retained and disseminated in accordance with this SORN. Finished intelligence products, and the information contained in those products, regardless of the original source system of that information, are also retained and disseminated in accordance with this SORN. CIRS is the exclusive CBP SORN for finished intelligence products and any raw intelligence information, public source information, or other information collected by CBP for an intelligence purpose that is not subject to an existing DHS SORN. CIRS records were previously covered by CBP's Automated Targeting System SORN, DHS/CBP-006, 77 FR 30297 (May 22, 2012), and CBP's Analytical Framework for Intelligence System SORN, DHS/CBP-017, 77 FR 13813 (June 7, 2012). As part of the intelligence process, CBP investigators and analysts must review large amounts of data to identify and understand relationships between individuals, entities, threats, and events to generate law enforcement intelligence products that provide CBP operational units with actionable information for law enforcement purposes. DHS is claiming exemptions from certain requirements of the Privacy Act for DHS/CBP-024 CBP Intelligence Records System (CIRS) System of Records. Some information in CIRS relates to official DHS national security, law enforcement, immigration, and intelligence activities. These exemptions are needed to protect information relating to DHS activities from disclosure to subjects or others related to these activities. Specifically, the exemptions are required to preclude subjects of these activities from frustrating these processes; to avoid disclosure of activity techniques; to protect the identities and physical safety of confidential informants and law enforcement personnel; to ensure DHS retains the ability to obtain information from third parties and other sources; and to protect the privacy of third parties. Disclosure of information to the subject of the inquiry could also permit the subject to avoid detection or apprehension. In appropriate circumstances, when compliance would not appear to interfere with or adversely affect the law enforcement purposes of this system and the overall law enforcement [[Page 44125]] process, the applicable exemptions may be waived on a case by case basis. A notice of system of records for DHS/CBP-024 CIRS System of Records is also published in this issue of the Federal Register. II. Privacy Act The Privacy Act embodies fair information practice principles in a statutory framework governing the means by which Federal Government agencies collect, maintain, use, and disseminate individuals' records. The Privacy Act applies to information that is maintained in a ``system of records.'' A ``system of records'' is a group of any records under the control of an agency from which information is retrieved by the name of an individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual. In the Privacy Act, an individual is defined to encompass U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. Additionally, and similarly, the Judicial Redress Act (JRA) provides a statutory right to covered persons to make requests for access and amendment to covered records, as defined by the JRA, along with judicial review for denials of such requests. In addition, the JRA prohibits disclosures of covered records, except as otherwise permitted by the Privacy Act. The Privacy Act allows government agencies to exempt certain records from the access and amendment provisions. If an agency claims an exemption, however, it must issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to make clear to the public the reasons why a particular exemption is claimed. List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5 Freedom of information; Privacy. For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS proposes to amend chapter I of title 6, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows: PART 5--DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION 0 1. The authority citation for part 5 continues to read as follows: Authority: 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135; 5 U.S.C. 301. Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552. Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a. 0 2. In appendix C to part 5, add paragraph 78: Appendix C to Part 5--DHS Systems of Records Exempt From the Privacy Act * * * * * 78. The DHS/CBP-024 CBP Intelligence Records System (CIRS) System of Records consists of electronic and paper records and will be used by DHS and its components. The CIRS is a repository of information held by DHS in connection with its several and varied missions and functions, including, but not limited to the enforcement of civil and criminal laws; investigations, inquiries, and proceedings there under; and national security and intelligence activities. The CIRS contains information that is collected by, on behalf of, in support of, or in cooperation with DHS and its components and may contain personally identifiable information collected by other Federal, state, local, tribal, foreign, or international government agencies. The Secretary of Homeland Security, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), has exempted this system from the following provisions of the Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) and (4); (d); (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(3), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), (e)(5), and (e)(8); (f); and (g). Additionally, the Secretary of Homeland Security, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1) and (k)(2), has exempted this system from the following provisions of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), and (f). When this system receives a record from another system exempted in that source system under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1), (k)(2), or (j)(2), DHS will claim the same exemptions for those records that are claimed for the original primary systems of records from which they originated and claims any additional exemptions set forth here. Exemptions from these particular subsections are justified, on a case by case basis to be determined at the time a request is made, for the following reasons: (a) From subsection (c)(3) and (4) (Accounting for Disclosures) because release of the accounting of disclosures could alert the subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal, civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of that investigation and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS as well as the recipient agency. Disclosure of the accounting would therefore present a serious impediment to law enforcement efforts and/or efforts to preserve national security. Disclosure of the accounting would also permit the individual who is the subject of a record to impede the investigation, to tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to avoid detection or apprehension, which would undermine the entire investigative process. (b) From subsection (d) (Access and Amendment to Records) because access to the records contained in this system of records could inform the subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal, civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of that investigation and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS or another agency. Access to the records could permit the individual who is the subject of a record to impede the investigation, to tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to avoid detection or apprehension. Amendment of the records could interfere with ongoing investigations and law enforcement activities and would impose an unreasonable administrative burden by requiring investigations to be continually reinvestigated. In addition, permitting access and amendment to such information could disclose security-sensitive information that could be detrimental to homeland security. (c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and Necessity of Information) because in the course of investigations into potential violations of Federal law, the accuracy of information obtained or introduced occasionally may be unclear, or the information may not be strictly relevant or necessary to a specific investigation. In the interests of effective law enforcement, it is appropriate to retain all information that may aid in establishing patterns of unlawful activity. (d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of Information from Individuals) because requiring that information be collected from the subject of an investigation would alert the subject to the nature or existence of the investigation, thereby interfering with that investigation and related law enforcement activities. (e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to Subjects) because providing such detailed information could impede law enforcement by compromising the existence of a confidential investigation or reveal the identity of witnesses or confidential informants. (f) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and (e)(4)(I) (Agency Requirements) and (f) (Agency Rules) because portions of this system are exempt from the individual access and amendment provisions of subsection (d) for the reasons noted above, and therefore DHS is not required to establish requirements, rules, or procedures with respect to such access. Providing notice to individuals with respect to existence of records pertaining to them in the system of records or otherwise setting up procedures pursuant to which individuals may access, amend, and view records pertaining to themselves in the system would undermine investigative efforts and reveal the identities of witnesses, and potential witnesses, and confidential informants. (g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of Information) because with the collection of information for law enforcement purposes, it is impossible to determine in advance what information is accurate, relevant, timely, and complete. Compliance with subsection (e)(5) would preclude DHS agents from using their investigative training and exercise of good judgment to both conduct and report on investigations. (h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on Individuals) because compliance would interfere with DHS's ability to obtain, serve, and issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law enforcement mechanisms that may be filed under seal and could result in disclosure of investigative techniques, procedures, and evidence. (i) From subsection (g) to the extent that the system is exempt from other specific subsections of the Privacy Act relating to individuals' rights to access and amend their records contained in the system. Therefore DHS is not required to establish rules or procedures pursuant to which individuals may seek a civil remedy for the agency's: Refusal to amend a record; refusal to comply with a request for access to records; failure to maintain accurate, relevant timely and [[Page 44126]] complete records; or failure to otherwise comply with an individual's right to access or amend records. Jonathan R. Cantor Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Department of Homeland Security. [FR Doc. 2017-19717 Filed 9-20-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
![44124
Proposed Rules Federal Register
Vol. 82, No. 182
Thursday, September 21, 2017
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER www.regulations.gov, including any and disseminated in accordance with
contains notices to the public of the proposed personal information provided. this SORN. Finished intelligence
issuance of rules and regulations. The Docket: For access to the docket to products, and the information contained
purpose of these notices is to give interested read background documents or in those products, regardless of the
persons an opportunity to participate in the comments received, go to http:// original source system of that
rule making prior to the adoption of the final www.regulations.gov.
rules. information, are also retained and
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For disseminated in accordance with this
general questions please contact: Debra SORN.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND L. Danisek (202) 344–1610, Privacy CIRS is the exclusive CBP SORN for
SECURITY Officer, U.S. Customs and Border finished intelligence products and any
Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue raw intelligence information, public
Office of the Secretary NW., Washington, DC 20229. For source information, or other information
privacy issues please contact: Jonathan collected by CBP for an intelligence
6 CFR Part 5 R. Cantor, (202) 343–1717, Acting Chief purpose that is not subject to an existing
Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, DHS SORN. CIRS records were
[Docket No. DHS 2017–0026] Department of Homeland Security, previously covered by CBP’s Automated
Washington, DC 20528. Targeting System SORN, DHS/CBP–006,
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 77 FR 30297 (May 22, 2012), and CBP’s
Exemptions; Department of Homeland Analytical Framework for Intelligence
Security (DHS)/U.S. Customs and I. Background
System SORN, DHS/CBP–017, 77 FR
Border Protection (CBP)-024 CBP In accordance with the Privacy Act of 13813 (June 7, 2012). As part of the
Intelligence Records System (CIRS) 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the Department of intelligence process, CBP investigators
System of Records Homeland Security (DHS)/U.S. Customs and analysts must review large amounts
and Border Protection (CBP) proposes to of data to identify and understand
AGENCY: Department of Homeland concurrently establish a new DHS
Security, Privacy Office. relationships between individuals,
system of records titled, ‘‘DHS/CBP–024 entities, threats, and events to generate
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. CBP Intelligence Records System (CIRS) law enforcement intelligence products
SUMMARY: The Department of System of Records’’ and this notice of that provide CBP operational units with
Homeland Security is giving concurrent proposed rulemaking to exempt actionable information for law
notice of a newly established system of portions of the system of records from enforcement purposes.
records pursuant to the Privacy Act of one or more provisions of the Privacy
1974 for the ‘‘Department of Homeland Act because of criminal, civil, and DHS is claiming exemptions from
Security (DHS)/U.S. Customs and administrative enforcement certain requirements of the Privacy Act
Border Protection (CBP)-024 CBP requirements. for DHS/CBP–024 CBP Intelligence
Intelligence Records System (CIRS) The CIRS system of records is owned Records System (CIRS) System of
System of Records’’ and this proposed by CBP’s Office of Intelligence (OI). Records. Some information in CIRS
rulemaking. In this proposed CIRS contains information collected by relates to official DHS national security,
rulemaking, the Department proposes to CBP to support CBP’s law enforcement law enforcement, immigration, and
exempt portions of the system of records intelligence mission. This information intelligence activities. These
from one or more provisions of the includes raw intelligence information exemptions are needed to protect
Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, collected by CBP’s OI, public source information relating to DHS activities
and administrative enforcement information, and information initially from disclosure to subjects or others
requirements. collected by CBP pursuant to its related to these activities. Specifically,
immigration and customs authorities. the exemptions are required to preclude
DATES: Comments must be received on This information is analyzed and subjects of these activities from
or before October 23, 2017. incorporated into intelligence products. frustrating these processes; to avoid
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, CBP currently uses the Analytical disclosure of activity techniques; to
identified by docket number DHS 2017– Framework for Intelligence (AFI) and protect the identities and physical safety
0026, by one of the following methods: the Intelligence Reporting System (IRS) of confidential informants and law
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: http:// information technology (IT) systems to enforcement personnel; to ensure DHS
www.regulations.gov. Follow the facilitate the development of finished retains the ability to obtain information
instructions for submitting comments. intelligence products. These products from third parties and other sources;
• Fax: 202–343–4010. are disseminated to various stakeholders and to protect the privacy of third
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
• Mail: Jonathan R. Cantor, Acting including CBP executive management, parties. Disclosure of information to the
Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, CBP operational units, various subject of the inquiry could also permit
Department of Homeland Security, government agencies, and the the subject to avoid detection or
Washington, DC 20528. Intelligence Community. Information apprehension.
Instructions: All submissions received collected by CBP for an intelligence In appropriate circumstances, when
must include the agency name and purpose that is not covered by an compliance would not appear to
docket number for this notice. All existing DHS System of Records Notice interfere with or adversely affect the law
comments received will be posted (SORN) and is not incorporated into a enforcement purposes of this system
without change to http:// finished intelligence product is retained and the overall law enforcement
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:10 Sep 20, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21SEP1.SGM 21SEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_44306/page/1.svg)
![44126 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 182 / Thursday, September 21, 2017 / Proposed Rules
complete records; or failure to otherwise docket, including the name of the maximum weight of 1,742 pounds (790
comply with an individual’s right to access individual sending the comment (or kilograms).
or amend records. signing the comment for an association, The EASA type certificated the DG–
Jonathan R. Cantor business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s 1000M powered glider under Type
Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Department of complete Privacy Act Statement can be Certificate Number (No.) EASA.A.072
Homeland Security. found in the Federal Register published on March 17, 2011. The associated
[FR Doc. 2017–19717 Filed 9–20–17; 8:45 am] on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478), EASA Type Certificate Data Sheet
as well as at http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov. (TCDS) No. EASA.A.072 defines the DG
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
Docket: Background documents or Flugzeubau GmbH certification basis
comments received may be read at submitted to the FAA for review and
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. acceptance.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION The applicable requirements for glider
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket certification in the United States can be
Federal Aviation Administration
Operations in Room W12–140 of the found in FAA Advisory Circular (AC)
West Building Ground Floor at 1200 21.17–2A, ‘‘Type Certification—Fixed-
14 CFR Part 21
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, Wing Gliders (Sailplanes), Including
[Docket No. FAA–2017–0851] DC, between 9 a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday Powered Gliders,’’ dated February 10,
through Friday, except Federal holidays. 1993. AC 21.17–2A has been the basis
Airworthiness Criteria: Glider Design for certification of gliders and powered
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Criteria for DG Flugzeugbau GmbH gliders in the United States for many
Model DG–1000M Glider Jim Rutherford, AIR–692, Federal
Aviation Administration, Policy & years. AC 21.17–2A states that
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Innovation Division, Small Airplane applicants may utilize the Joint Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT. Standards Branch, 901 Locust, Room Requirements (JAR)–22, ‘‘Sailplanes and
ACTION: Notice of proposed design 301, Kansas City, MO 64106, telephone Powered Sailplanes,’’ or another
criteria. (816) 329–4165, facsimile (816) 329– accepted airworthiness criteria, or a
4090. combination of both, as the accepted
SUMMARY: This notice announces the means for showing compliance for
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: glider type certification.
availability of and requests comments
on the proposed design criteria for the Comments Invited Type Certification Basis
DG Flugzeugbau GmbH model DG– We invite interested people to take
1000M glider. The Administrator finds The applicant proposed a
part in this rulemaking by sending Certification Basis based on JAR–22,
the proposed design criteria, which written comments, data, or views. The
make up the certification basis for the amendment 6, dated August 01, 2001. In
most helpful comments reference a addition to JAR–22 requirements, the
DG–1000M glider, acceptable. These specific portion of the design criteria,
final design criteria will be published in applicant proposed to comply with
explain the reason for any other requirements from the
the Federal Register. recommended change, and include certification basis referenced in EASA
DATES: Comments must be received on supporting data. We ask that you send TCDS No. EASA.A.072, including an
or before October 23, 2017. us two copies of written comments. equivalent safety finding.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified We will consider all comments
by docket number FAA–2017–0851 received on or before the closing date List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 21
using any of the following methods: for comments. We will consider Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to comments filed late if it is possible to and record keeping requirements.
http://www.regulations.gov and follow do so without incurring expense or The authority citation for these
the online instructions for sending your delay. We may change these airworthiness criteria is as follows:
comments electronically. airworthiness design criteria based on
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7572; 49 U.S.C. 106(f),
• Mail: Send comments to Docket received comments. 106(g), 40105, 40113, 44701–44702, 44704,
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of 44707, 44709, 44711, 44713, 44715, 45303.
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Background
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West On May 18, 2011, DG Flugzeugbau The Proposed Design Criteria
Building Ground Floor, Washington, GmbH submitted an application for type Applicable Airworthiness Criteria
DC, 20590–0001. validation of the DG–1000M glider in under § 21.17(b).
• Hand Delivery of Courier: Take accordance with the Technical Based on the Special Class provisions
comments to Docket Operations in Implementation Procedures for of § 21.17(b), the following
Room W12–140 of the West Building Airworthiness and Environmental airworthiness requirements form the
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Certification Between the FAA and the FAA Certification Basis for this design:
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 European Aviation Safety Agency 1. 14 CFR part 21, effective February 1,
a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday through (EASA), dated May 05, 2011. This 1965, including amendments 21–1 through
Friday, except Federal holidays. model is a variant of the DG–1000T 21–92 as applicable.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket powered glider and will be added to
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
2. JAR–22, amendment 6, dated August 01,
Operations at 202–493–2251. existing Type Certificate No. G20CE. 2001.
Privacy: The FAA will post all The model DG–1000M is a two-seat, 3. EASA Equivalent Safety Finding to JAR
comments it receives, without change, mid-wing, self-launching, powered 22.207(c)—Stall warning. (FAA issued
to http://regulations.gov, including any glider with a retractable engine and corresponding Equivalent Level of Safety
(ELOS) Memorandum No. ACE–07–01A,
personal information the commenter fixed-pitch propeller. It is constructed dated April 02, 2012, as an extension to an
provides. Using the search function of from carbon and glass fiber reinforced existing ELOS finding).
the docket Web site, anyone can find plastic, and features a conventianl T- 4. ‘‘Standards for Structural Substantiation
and read the electronic form of all type tailplane. The glider also features of Sailplane and Powered Sailplane Parts
comments received into any FAA a 65.6 foot (20 meter) wingspan and a Consisting of Glass or Carbon Fiber
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:10 Sep 20, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21SEP1.SGM 21SEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_44306/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-10-24 14:33:27
Document Modified: 2018-10-24 14:33:27
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before October 23, 2017. | |
| Contact | For general questions please contact: Debra L. Danisek (202) 344-1610, Privacy Officer, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20229. For privacy issues please contact: Jonathan R. Cantor, (202) 343-1717, Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 44124 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR