82 FR 44160 - Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 182 (September 21, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 182 (September 21, 2017)
| Page Range | 44160-44162 | |
| FR Document | 2017-20125 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 182 (Thursday, September 21, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 44160-44162] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-20125] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-549-821] Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On June 8, 2017, the Department of Commerc e (Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review (AR) of the antidumping duty (AD) order on polyethylene retail carrier bags (PRCBs) from Thailand. The period of review (POR) is August 1, 2015, through July 31, 2016. We invited parties to comment on the preliminary results. We received no comments. Accordingly, the final results remain unchanged from the preliminary results.DATES: Applicable September 21, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shanah Lee, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6386. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 8, 2017, the Department published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the 2015-2016 administrative review of the AD order on PRCBs from Thailand.\1\ In the Preliminary Results, we rescinded the review for mandatory respondent, Sahachit Watana Plastic Ind. Co. Ltd. (Sahachit) in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).\2\ In the Preliminary Results, we also preliminarily applied adverse facts available to mandatory [[Page 44161]] respondent Landblue (Thailand) Co., Ltd. (Landblue), pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\3\ In addition, in accordance with section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, the Department preliminarily assigned to the non-selected companies the only rate determined for an individual respondent in this review, 122.88 percent.\4\ Finally, in the Preliminary Results, we preliminarily determined that Super Grip Co., Ltd. (Super Grip) had no shipments during the POR.\5\ The Department gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results. None were received. The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Thailand: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016, 82 FR 26666 (June 8, 2017) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). \2\ Id. at 26667. \3\ Id. at 26667, 26668. \4\ Id. at 26667. \5\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to this order is PRCBs, which may be referred to as t-shirt sacks, merchandise bags, grocery bags, or checkout bags. The subject merchandise is defined as nonsealable sacks and bags with handles (including drawstrings), without zippers or integral extruded closures, with or without gussets, with or without printing, of polyethylene film having a thickness no greater than 0.035 inch (0.889 mm) and no less than 0.00035 inch (0.00889 mm), and with no length or width shorter than 6 inches (15.24 cm) or longer than 40 inches (101.6 cm). The depth of the bag may be shorter than 6 inches but not longer than 40 inches (101.6 cm). PRCBs are typically provided without any consumer packaging and free of charge by retail establishments, e.g., grocery, drug, convenience, department, specialty retail, discount stores, and restaurants, to their customers to package and carry their purchased products. The scope of the order excludes (1) polyethylene bags that are not printed with logos or store names and that are closeable with drawstrings made of polyethylene film and (2) polyethylene bags that are packed in consumer packaging with printing that refers to specific end-uses other than packaging and carrying merchandise from retail establishments, e.g., garbage bags, lawn bags, trash-can liners. As a result of changes to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), imports of the subject merchandise are currently classifiable under statistical category 3923.21.0085 of the HTSUS. Furthermore, although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Final Determination of No Shipments As noted above, in the Preliminary Results, we preliminarily determined that Super Grip had no shipments during the POR.\6\ We received no comments from interested parties with respect to this claim. Therefore, because the record indicates that Super Grip did not export subject merchandise to the United States during the POR, and the Department has not received any information that would cause it to alter its Preliminary Results, we continue to find that Super Grip had no shipments during the POR. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of Review Because the Department received no comments after the Preliminary Results for consideration for these final results, we have made no changes to the Preliminary Results. We continue to determine that Landblue did not act to the best of its ability by failing to respond to the Department's questionnaires, pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of the Act; that the application of adverse facts available to Landblue is warranted; and that the rate of 122.88 percent is appropriate to apply to Landblue as adverse facts available. This rate is the highest rate calculated in the Final LTFV \7\ and has been applied in each successive administrative review of this proceeding.\8\ Accordingly, pursuant to section 776(c)(2) of the Act, this rate does not require corroboration. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Thailand, 69 FR 34122, 34125 (June 18, 2004) (Final LTFV). \8\ See Final LTFV, 69 FR at 34123-34124; Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 72 FR 1982, 1983 (January 17, 2007); Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 72 FR 64580, 64582 (November 16, 2007); Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 2511, 2512 (January 15, 2009) (2006-2007 Final Results); and Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 65751, 65752 (December 11, 2009). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition, consistent with the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision in Albemarle Corp. v. United States,\9\ we have determined that a reasonable method for determining the rate for the non-selected companies is to use the rate applied to the mandatory respondent (Landblue) in this administrative review.\10\ This is the only rate determined in this review for an individual respondent and, thus, should be applied to the 26 non-selected companies under section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act. Accordingly, we are assigning to the non- selected companies the dumping margin of 122.88 percent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Albermarle Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United States, 821 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016). \10\ See, e.g., Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Under 4\1/2\ Inches) From Japan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015, 81 FR 45124, 45124 (July 12, 2016), unchanged in Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Under 4\1/2\ Inches) From Japan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015, 81 FR 80640, 80641 (November 16, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We therefore determine for these final results that the following weighted-average dumping margins on PRCBs from Thailand exist for the POR: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter/Producer dumping margins (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Landblue (Thailand) Co., Ltd................................ 122.88 Apple Film Company, Ltd..................................... 122.88 Dpac Inter Corporation Co., Ltd............................. 122.88 Elite Poly and Packaging Co., Ltd........................... 122.88 Film Master Co., Ltd........................................ 122.88 Inno Cargo Co., Ltd......................................... 122.88 Innopack Industry Co., Ltd.................................. 122.88 K. International Packaging Co., Ltd......................... 122.88 King Bag Co., Ltd........................................... 122.88 King Pac Industrial Co., Ltd................................ 122.88 M & P World Polymer Co., Ltd................................ 122.88 Minigrip (Thailand) Co., Ltd................................ 122.88 Multibax Public Co., Ltd.................................... 122.88 Naraipak Co., Ltd........................................... 122.88 PMC Innopack Co., Ltd....................................... 122.88 Poly Plast (Thailand) Co., Ltd.............................. 122.88 Poly World Co., Ltd......................................... 122.88 Prepack Thailand Co., Ltd................................... 122.88 Print Master Co., Ltd....................................... 122.88 Siam Best Products Trading Limited Partnership.............. 122.88 Sun Pack Inter Co., Ltd..................................... 122.88 Superpac Corporation Co., Ltd............................... 122.88 Thai Origin Co., Ltd........................................ 122.88 Thantawan Industry Public Co., Ltd.......................... 122.88 Triple B Pack Co., Ltd...................................... 122.88 Two Path Plaspack Co. Ltd................................... 122.88 Wing Fung Adhesive Manufacturing (Thailand) Co., Ltd........ 122.88 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment The Department has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review.\11\ The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the [[Page 44162]] date of publication of these final results of review. We will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 122.88 percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which were produced and/ or exported by Landblue, and ad valorem assessment rate of 122.88 percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which were produced and/or exported by the 26 companies that were not selected for individual examination.\12\ Additionally, because the Department determined that Super Grip had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR, for entries of merchandise produced by Super Grip, for which it did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate in effect during the POR if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b). \12\ See PDM, at ``Rate for Non-Examined Companies'' (for an explanation of how we preliminarily determined the rate of non- selected companies). \13\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for the reviewed companies will be the rates established in the final results of this review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-fair-value investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the merchandise; (4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer has its own rate, the cash deposit rate will continue to be 4.69 percent, the all-others rate established in the order.\14\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See Notice of Implementation of Determination Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Partial Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Order on Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Thailand, 75 FR 48940 (August 12, 2010). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanctions. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: September 14, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2017-20125 Filed 9-20-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![44160 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 182 / Thursday, September 21, 2017 / Notices
Office of the Executive Secretary, days after the date on which the Dated: September 15, 2017.
Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room Department initiated the investigation Gary Taverman
21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, if: (A) The petitioner 2 makes a timely Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
1401 Constitution Avenue NW., request for a postponement; or (B) the and Countervailing Duty Operations,
Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the Department concludes that the parties performing the non-exclusive duties of the
‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s concerned are cooperating, that the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Web site, which is accessible via Compliance.
investigation is extraordinarily
www.trade.gov/ftz. [FR Doc. 2017–20085 Filed 9–20–17; 8:45 am]
complicated, and that additional time is
For further information, contact necessary to make a preliminary BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Juanita Chen at juanita.chen@trade.gov determination. Under 19 CFR
or (202) 482–1378. 351.205(e), the petitioner must submit a
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Dated: September 14, 2017. request for postponement 25 days or
Andrew McGilvray, more before the scheduled date of the International Trade Administration
Executive Secretary. preliminary determination and must
state the reasons for the request. The [A–549–821]
[FR Doc. 2017–20083 Filed 9–20–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Department will grant the request unless Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From
it finds compelling reasons to deny the Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping
request. Duty Administrative Review, Final
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE On September 5, 2017, the petitioner Determination of No Shipments; 2015–
submitted a timely request that the 2016
International Trade Administration
Department postpone the preliminary
[C–570–063] AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
CVD determination.3 The petitioner
International Trade Administration,
stated that it requests postponement of
Cast Iron Soil Pipe Fittings From the Department of Commerce.
the preliminary determination because SUMMARY: On June 8, 2017, the
People’s Republic of China: the Department selected at least one
Postponement of Preliminary Department of Commerc
trading company as a mandatory published the preliminary results of the
Determination in the Countervailing
respondent, and has not yet received administrative review (AR) of the
Duty Investigation
questionnaire responses. Therefore, antidumping duty (AD) order on
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, postponing the preliminary polyethylene retail carrier bags (PRCBs)
International Trade Administration, determination would allow for receipt from Thailand. The period of review
Department of Commerce. and review of these responses. (POR) is August 1, 2015, through July
DATES: Applied September 21, 2017. In accordance with 19 CFR 31, 2016. We invited parties to comment
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 351.205(e), the petitioner stated the on the preliminary results. We received
Dennis McClure at (202) 482–5973 or reasons for requesting a postponement no comments. Accordingly, the final
Jinny Ahn at (202) 482–0339, AD/CVD of the preliminary determination, and results remain unchanged from the
Operations, Enforcement and the Department finds no compelling preliminary results.
Compliance, International Trade reason to deny the request. Therefore, in DATES: Applicable September 21, 2017.
Administration, U.S. Department of accordance with section 703(c)(1)(A) of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue the Act, the Department is postponing Shanah Lee, AD/CVD Operations, Office
NW., Washington, DC 20230. the deadline for the preliminary III, Enforcement and Compliance,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: determination to no later than 130 days International Trade Administration,
Background after the date on which this U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
investigation was initiated, i.e., Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
On August 2, 2017, the Department December 11, 2017.4 Pursuant to section
initiated a countervailing duty (CVD) 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6386.
705(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
investigation of cast iron soil pipe
351.210(b)(1), the deadline for the final
fittings from the People’s Respublic of Background
determination of this investigation will
China.1 Currently, the preliminary
continue to be 75 days after the date of On June 8, 2017, the Department
determination is due no later than
the preliminary determination. published in the Federal Register the
October 6, 2017.
This notice is issued and published preliminary results of the 2015–2016
Postponement of Preliminary pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act administrative review of the AD order
Determinations and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1). on PRCBs from Thailand.1 In the
Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of Preliminary Results, we rescinded the
1930, as amended (the Act), requires the 2 The petitioner is Cast Iron Soil Pipe Institute
review for mandatory respondent,
Department to issue the preliminary (CISPI). Sahachit Watana Plastic Ind. Co. Ltd.
determination in a CVD investigation 3 See the petitioner’s letter, ‘‘Re: Cast Iron Soil (Sahachit) in accordance with 19 CFR
within 65 days after the date on which Pipe Fittings from the People’s Republic of China: 351.213(d)(1).2 In the Preliminary
Request to Extend the Preliminary Determination,’’ Results, we also preliminarily applied
the Department initiated the
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
dated September 5, 2017.
investigation. However, section 4 Postponing the preliminary determination to
adverse facts available to mandatory
703(c)(1) of the Act permits the 130 days after initiation would place the deadline
1 See Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from
Department to postpone the preliminary on Sunday, December 10, 2017. The Department’s
practice dictates that where a deadline falls on a Thailand: Preliminary Results and Partial
determination until no later than 130 weekend or federal holiday, the appropriate Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative
deadline is the next business day. See Notice of Review and Preliminary Determination of No
1 See Cast Iron Soil Pipe Fittings From the Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next Business Day’’ Shipments; 2015–2016, 82 FR 26666 (June 8, 2017)
People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines (Preliminary Results) and accompanying
Countervailing Duty Investigation, 82 FR 37048 Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
(August 8, 2017) (Initiation Notice). FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). 2 Id. at 26667.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:52 Sep 20, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM 21SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_44342/page/1.svg)
![44162 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 182 / Thursday, September 21, 2017 / Notices
date of publication of these final results requirements, when imposed, shall October, November, and December of
of review. We will instruct CBP to apply remain in effect until further notice. 2017. Certain fishermen and shark
an ad valorem assessment rate of 122.88 dealers are required to attend a
Notification to Importers
percent to all entries of subject workshop to meet regulatory
merchandise during the POR which This notice also serves as a final requirements and to maintain valid
were produced and/or exported by reminder to importers of their permits. Specifically, the Atlantic Shark
Landblue, and ad valorem assessment responsibility under 19 CFR Identification Workshop is mandatory
rate of 122.88 percent to all entries of 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate for all federally permitted Atlantic shark
subject merchandise during the POR regarding the reimbursement of dealers. The Protected Species Safe
which were produced and/or exported antidumping duties prior to liquidation Handling, Release, and Identification
by the 26 companies that were not of the relevant entries during this Workshop is mandatory for vessel
selected for individual examination.12 review period. Failure to comply with owners and operators who use bottom
Additionally, because the Department this requirement could result in the longline, pelagic longline, or gillnet
determined that Super Grip had no Department’s presumption that gear, and who have also been issued
shipments of subject merchandise reimbursement of antidumping duties shark or swordfish limited access
during the POR, for entries of occurred and the subsequent assessment permits. Additional free workshops will
merchandise produced by Super Grip, of double antidumping duties. be conducted during 2018 and will be
for which it did not know that the announced in a future notice.
Notification Regarding Administrative
merchandise was destined for the DATES: The Atlantic Shark Identification
Protective Orders
United States, we will instruct CBP to Workshops will be held on October 26,
liquidate unreviewed entries at the all- This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative November 16, and December 14, 2017.
others rate in effect during the POR if
protective order (APO) of their The Protected Species Safe Handling,
there is no rate for the intermediate
responsibility concerning the Release, and Identification Workshops
company(ies) involved in the
transaction.13 destruction of proprietary information will be held on October 12, October 25,
disclosed under APO in accordance November 8, November 14, December 8,
Cash Deposit Requirements and December 13, 2017.
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
The following deposit requirements written notification of the return or See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for
will be effective upon publication of the destruction of APO materials or further details.
notice of final results of administrative conversion to judicial protective order is ADDRESSES: The Atlantic Shark
review for all shipments of subject hereby requested. Failure to comply Identification Workshops will be held in
merchandise entered, or withdrawn with the regulations and terms of an Somerville, MA; Mount Pleasant, SC;
from warehouse, for consumption on or APO is a violation subject to sanctions. and Largo, FL.
after the publication date, as provided We are issuing and publishing these The Protected Species Safe Handling,
by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The results in accordance with sections Release, and Identification Workshops
cash deposit rates for the reviewed 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 will be held in Largo, FL; Manahawkin,
companies will be the rates established CFR 351.221(b)(5). NJ; Port St. Lucie, FL; Kitty Hawk, NC;
in the final results of this review; (2) for Ronkonkoma, NY; and Kenner, LA.
Dated: September 14, 2017.
merchandise exported by manufacturers See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for
or exporters not covered in this review Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
further details on workshop locations.
but covered in a prior segment of the
and Countervailing Duty Operations, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
performing the non-exclusive functions and Pearson by phone: (727) 824–5399, or by
duties of the Assistant Secretary for fax: (727) 824–5398.
published for the most recently Enforcement and Compliance.
completed segment of this proceeding; SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
[FR Doc. 2017–20125 Filed 9–20–17; 8:45 am]
(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered workshop schedules, registration
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P information, and a list of frequently
in this review, a prior review, or the
less-than-fair-value investigation but the asked questions regarding these
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate workshops are posted on the Internet at:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
will be the rate established for the most http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/hms/
recently completed segment of this National Oceanic and Atmospheric compliance/workshops/index.html.
proceeding for the manufacturer of the Administration Atlantic Shark Identification
merchandise; (4) if neither the exporter Workshops
RIN 0648–XF680
nor the manufacturer has its own rate,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be Since January 1, 2008, Atlantic shark
Schedules for Atlantic Shark dealers have been prohibited from
4.69 percent, the all-others rate Identification Workshops and
established in the order.14 These deposit receiving, purchasing, trading, or
Protected Species Safe Handling, bartering for Atlantic sharks unless a
12 See PDM, at ‘‘Rate for Non-Examined
Release, and Identification Workshops valid Atlantic Shark Identification
Companies’’ (for an explanation of how we AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Workshop certificate is on the premises
preliminarily determined the rate of non-selected
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and of each business listed under the shark
companies).
13 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), dealer permit that first receives Atlantic
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 Commerce. sharks (71 FR 58057; October 2, 2006).
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). ACTION: Notice of public workshops. Dealers who attend and successfully
14 See Notice of Implementation of Determination complete a workshop are issued a
Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round SUMMARY: Free Atlantic Shark certificate for each place of business that
Agreements Act and Partial Revocation of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Polyethylene Retail
Identification Workshops and Protected is permitted to receive sharks. These
Carrier Bags from Thailand, 75 FR 48940 (August Species Safe Handling, Release, and certificate(s) are valid for 3 years.
12, 2010). Identification Workshops will be held in Approximately 136 free Atlantic Shark
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:52 Sep 20, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM 21SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_44342/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-10-24 14:33:41
Document Modified: 2018-10-24 14:33:41
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable September 21, 2017. | |
| Contact | Shanah Lee, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6386. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 44160 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR