82 FR 45191 - Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Enhanced Monitoring; California

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 187 (September 28, 2017)

Page Range		45191-45192
FR Document		2017-20722

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of California on November 10, 1993. This SIP revision concerns the establishment of a Photochemical Assessment Monitoring System (PAMS) network in six ozone nonattainment areas within California. The EPA is taking this action under the Clean Air Act based on the conclusion that all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements related to PAMS SIP revisions have been met.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 187 (Thursday, September 28, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 187 (Thursday, September 28, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45191-45192]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20722]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2017-0411; FRL-9968-38-Region 9]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Enhanced 
Monitoring; California

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final 
action to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted 
by the State of California on November 10, 1993. This SIP revision 
concerns the establishment of a Photochemical Assessment Monitoring 
System (PAMS) network in six ozone nonattainment areas within 
California. The EPA is taking this action under the Clean Air Act based 
on the conclusion that all applicable statutory and regulatory 
requirements related to PAMS SIP revisions have been met.

DATES: This rule is effective October 30, 2017.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2017-0411. All documents in the docket are 
listed on the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed on 
the Web site, some information is not publicly available, e.g., 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as 
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be 
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket 
materials are available through http://www.regulations.gov, or please 
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section for additional availability information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris Lo, EPA Region IX, (415) 972-
3959, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' 
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Proposed Action

    On August 2, 2017 (82 FR 35922), we proposed to approve a SIP 
revision submitted by the State of California on November 10, 1993. 
Herein, we refer to our proposed action on August 2, 2017, as the 
``proposed rule.''
    In our proposed rule, we provided a discussion of the regulatory 
context leading to the SIP revision submitted by California on November 
10, 1993. In short, the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``Act''), as amended in 
1990, required the EPA to designate as nonattainment, and to classify 
as Marginal, Moderate, Serious, Severe or Extreme, any ozone areas that 
were still designated nonattainment under the 1977 Act Amendments, and 
any other areas violating the 1-hour ozone standard, generally based on 
air quality monitoring data from the 1987 through 1989 period.\1\ 
Within California, we classified six ozone nonattainment areas as 
Serious, Severe, or Extreme: Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin (``South 
Coast''), Sacramento Metro, San Diego County, San Joaquin Valley, 
Southeast Desert Modified Air Quality Management Area (``Southeast 
Desert'') and Ventura County.\2\ Such areas were subject to many 
requirements, including those related to enhanced monitoring in CAA 
section 182(c)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See section 107(d)(4) of the Act. See also 56 FR 56694, 
November 6, 1991.
    \2\ See 56 FR 56694, November 6, 1991.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    CAA section 182(c)(1) of the CAA required the EPA to promulgate 
rules for enhanced monitoring of ozone, oxides of nitrogen, and 
volatile organic compounds to obtain more comprehensive and 
representative data on ozone air pollution in areas designated 
nonattainment and classified as Serious, Severe or Extreme. The EPA's 
final PAMS regulation was promulgated on February 12, 1993 (58 FR 
8452). Section 182(c)(1) also required states to submit SIP revisions 
providing for enhanced monitoring for such areas consistent with the 
PAMS regulation.
    On November 10, 1993, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) 
submitted to the EPA a SIP revision for PAMS networks in California 
(``California PAMS SIP revision''). The California PAMS SIP revision 
consists of PAMS commitments from five California air districts with 
jurisdiction within the six relevant ozone nonattainment areas: The 
South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) (for South Coast and 
Southeast Desert areas); Sacramento Metro AQMD (for the Sacramento 
Metro area); San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (APCD) 
(for the San Diego County area); San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD (for 
the San Joaquin Valley area), and Ventura County APCD (for the Ventura 
County area), as well as CARB Executive Orders approving the 
commitments, and public process documentation. The California PAMS SIP 
revision is intended to meet the requirements of section 182(c)(1) of 
the Act and to comply with the PAMS regulation, codified at 40 CFR part 
58, as promulgated on February 12, 1993.
    In our proposed rule, we identified the criteria we used to review 
the California PAMS SIP revision submittal and provided our evaluation 
and rationale for proposed approval. We determined that California's 
PAMS SIP revision meets all applicable requirements: (1) By first 
committing to, and then by implementing, PAMS networks as required in 
40 CFR part 58; and (2) by providing the public with an opportunity to 
inspect the proposed

[[Page 45192]]

network description during the public review process for the proposed 
SIP revision prior to forwarding the adopted version to CARB for 
approval and submittal to the EPA as a revision to the California SIP. 
As such, in our proposed rule, we proposed to approve the California 
PAMS SIP revision submitted by CARB on November 10, 1993, as part of 
the California SIP.
    Please see our proposed rule for additional background information 
and a more detailed evaluation of the SIP revision and explanation of 
our basis for approval.

II. Public Comments

    The EPA's proposed action on August 2, 2017, provided a 30-day 
public comment period ending on September 1, 2017. We received no 
comments on our proposed action.

III. Final Action

    Under CAA section 110(k)(3) and for the reasons set forth in our 
proposed rule and summarized above, the EPA is taking final action to 
approve the California PAMS SIP revision submitted on November 10, 
1993, for the following six ozone nonattainment areas in California: 
South Coast, Sacramento Metro, San Diego County, San Joaquin Valley, 
Southeast Desert, and Ventura County. We are taking this final action 
based on our conclusion that the California PAMS SIP revision meets all 
applicable requirements for enhanced ambient pollutant concentration 
monitoring under CAA section 182(c)(1) and our PAMS regulation.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a 
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and 
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 
Accordingly, this action merely approves a state plan as meeting 
federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond 
those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act; and
     does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority 
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or 
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible 
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe 
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the action does not have tribal implications and will 
not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt 
tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 
9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 27, 2017. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: September 15, 2017.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(495) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan--in part.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (495) The following plan was submitted on November 10, 1993 by the 
Governor's designee.
    (i) [Reserved]
    (ii) Additional material.
    (A) California Air Resources Board.
    (1) Letter and attachments from James D. Boyd, Executive Officer, 
California Air Resources Board, to Felicia Marcus, Regional 
Administrator, EPA Region IX, November 10, 1993.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-20722 Filed 9-27-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 187 / Thursday, September 28, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 45191

proceedings to enforce its requirements. SIP revision concerns the establishment California, we classified six ozone
(See section 307(b)(2).) of a Photochemical Assessment nonattainment areas as Serious, Severe,
Monitoring System (PAMS) network in or Extreme: Los Angeles-South Coast
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
six ozone nonattainment areas within Air Basin (‘‘South Coast’’), Sacramento
Environmental protection, Air California. The EPA is taking this action Metro, San Diego County, San Joaquin
pollution control, Incorporation by under the Clean Air Act based on the Valley, Southeast Desert Modified Air
reference, Intergovernmental relations, conclusion that all applicable statutory Quality Management Area (‘‘Southeast
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate and regulatory requirements related to Desert’’) and Ventura County.2 Such
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping PAMS SIP revisions have been met. areas were subject to many
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile DATES: This rule is effective October 30, requirements, including those related to
organic compounds. 2017. enhanced monitoring in CAA section
Dated: September 8, 2017. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a 182(c)(1).
docket for this action under Docket No. CAA section 182(c)(1) of the CAA
Cecil Rodrigues,
EPA–R09–OAR–2017–0411. All required the EPA to promulgate rules for
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. enhanced monitoring of ozone, oxides
documents in the docket are listed on
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: the http://www.regulations.gov Web of nitrogen, and volatile organic
site. Although listed on the Web site, compounds to obtain more
PART 52—APPROVAL AND comprehensive and representative data
some information is not publicly
PROMULGATION OF on ozone air pollution in areas
available, e.g., Confidential Business
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS designated nonattainment and classified
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. as Serious, Severe or Extreme. The
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 EPA’s final PAMS regulation was
continues to read as follows: Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on promulgated on February 12, 1993 (58
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. the Internet and will be publicly FR 8452). Section 182(c)(1) also
available only in hard copy form. required states to submit SIP revisions
Subpart VV—Virginia providing for enhanced monitoring for
Publicly available docket materials are
§ 52.2420 [Amended] available through http:// such areas consistent with the PAMS
www.regulations.gov, or please contact regulation.
■ 2. In § 52.2420, the table in paragraph On November 10, 1993, the California
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
(c) is amended by: Air Resources Board (CARB) submitted
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
■ a. Removing the section entitled ‘‘Part to the EPA a SIP revision for PAMS
additional availability information.
II NOX Annual Trading Program’’, networks in California (‘‘California
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
including ‘‘Article 1’’ through ‘‘Article PAMS SIP revision’’). The California
9’’ including entries ‘‘5–140–1010’’ Doris Lo, EPA Region IX, (415) 972– PAMS SIP revision consists of PAMS
through ‘‘5–140–1880’’; 3959, lo.doris@epa.gov. commitments from five California air
■ b. Removing the section entitled ‘‘Part SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: districts with jurisdiction within the six
III NOX Ozone Season Trading Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ relevant ozone nonattainment areas: The
Program’’, including ‘‘Article 1’’ through and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. South Coast Air Quality Management
‘‘Article 9’’ including entries ‘‘5–140– Table of Contents District (AQMD) (for South Coast and
2010’’ through ‘‘5–140–2880’’; and; Southeast Desert areas); Sacramento
I. Proposed Action Metro AQMD (for the Sacramento Metro
■ c. Removing the section entitled ‘‘Part
II. Public Comments
IV SO2 Annual Trading Program’’, III. Final Action
area); San Diego County Air Pollution
including ‘‘Article 1’’ through ‘‘Article IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Control District (APCD) (for the San
9’’ including entries ‘‘5–140–3010’’ Diego County area); San Joaquin Valley
through ‘‘5–140–3880’’. I. Proposed Action Unified APCD (for the San Joaquin
[FR Doc. 2017–20724 Filed 9–27–17; 8:45 am] On August 2, 2017 (82 FR 35922), we Valley area), and Ventura County APCD
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P proposed to approve a SIP revision (for the Ventura County area), as well as
submitted by the State of California on CARB Executive Orders approving the
November 10, 1993. Herein, we refer to commitments, and public process
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION our proposed action on August 2, 2017, documentation. The California PAMS
AGENCY as the ‘‘proposed rule.’’ SIP revision is intended to meet the
In our proposed rule, we provided a requirements of section 182(c)(1) of the
40 CFR Part 52 discussion of the regulatory context Act and to comply with the PAMS
leading to the SIP revision submitted by regulation, codified at 40 CFR part 58,
[EPA–R09–OAR–2017–0411; FRL–9968–38– as promulgated on February 12, 1993.
Region 9]
California on November 10, 1993. In
short, the Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘Act’’), In our proposed rule, we identified
Approval and Promulgation of as amended in 1990, required the EPA the criteria we used to review the
Implementation Plans; Enhanced to designate as nonattainment, and to California PAMS SIP revision submittal
Monitoring; California classify as Marginal, Moderate, Serious, and provided our evaluation and
Severe or Extreme, any ozone areas that rationale for proposed approval. We
AGENCY: Environmental Protection were still designated nonattainment determined that California’s PAMS SIP
Agency (EPA). under the 1977 Act Amendments, and revision meets all applicable
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES

ACTION: Final rule. any other areas violating the 1-hour requirements: (1) By first committing to,
ozone standard, generally based on air and then by implementing, PAMS
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection quality monitoring data from the 1987 networks as required in 40 CFR part 58;
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to through 1989 period.1 Within and (2) by providing the public with an
approve a State Implementation Plan opportunity to inspect the proposed
(SIP) revision submitted by the State of 1 See section 107(d)(4) of the Act. See also 56 FR

California on November 10, 1993. This 56694, November 6, 1991. 2 See 56 FR 56694, November 6, 1991.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:07 Sep 27, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM 28SER1

45192 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 187 / Thursday, September 28, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

network description during the public • is certified as not having a this action must be filed in the United
review process for the proposed SIP significant economic impact on a States Court of Appeals for the
revision prior to forwarding the adopted substantial number of small entities appropriate circuit by November 27,
version to CARB for approval and under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 2017. Filing a petition for
submittal to the EPA as a revision to the U.S.C. 601 et seq.); reconsideration by the Administrator of
California SIP. As such, in our proposed • does not contain any unfunded this final rule does not affect the finality
rule, we proposed to approve the mandate or significantly or uniquely of this rule for the purposes of judicial
California PAMS SIP revision submitted affect small governments, as described review nor does it extend the time
by CARB on November 10, 1993, as part in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
within which a petition for judicial
of the California SIP. of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have federalism review may be filed, and shall not
Please see our proposed rule for
implications as specified in Executive postpone the effectiveness of such rule
additional background information and
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, or action. This action may not be
a more detailed evaluation of the SIP
revision and explanation of our basis for 1999); challenged later in proceedings to
approval. • is not an economically significant enforce its requirements (see section
regulatory action based on health or 307(b)(2)).
II. Public Comments safety risks subject to Executive Order
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
The EPA’s proposed action on August 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
2, 2017, provided a 30-day public • is not a significant regulatory action Environmental protection, Air
comment period ending on September subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR pollution control, Incorporation by
1, 2017. We received no comments on 28355, May 22, 2001); reference, Intergovernmental relations,
our proposed action. • is not subject to requirements of
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
Section 12(d) of the National
III. Final Action recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
Technology Transfer and Advancement
organic compounds.
Under CAA section 110(k)(3) and for Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
the reasons set forth in our proposed application of those requirements would Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
rule and summarized above, the EPA is be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; Dated: September 15, 2017.
taking final action to approve the and
Deborah Jordan,
California PAMS SIP revision submitted • does not provide the EPA with the
on November 10, 1993, for the following discretionary authority to address, as Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
six ozone nonattainment areas in appropriate, disproportionate human
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
California: South Coast, Sacramento health or environmental effects, using
Federal Regulations is amended as
Metro, San Diego County, San Joaquin practicable and legally permissible
follows:
Valley, Southeast Desert, and Ventura methods, under Executive Order 12898
County. We are taking this final action (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). PART 52—APPROVAL AND
based on our conclusion that the In addition, the SIP is not approved
PROMULGATION OF
California PAMS SIP revision meets all to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
applicable requirements for enhanced
ambient pollutant concentration an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
monitoring under CAA section 182(c)(1)
and our PAMS regulation. Indian country, the action does not have continues to read as follows:
tribal implications and will not impose Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order substantial direct costs on tribal
Reviews governments or preempt tribal law as Subpart F—California
Under the Clean Air Act, the specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
Administrator is required to approve a FR 67249, November 9, 2000). ■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by
SIP submission that complies with the The Congressional Review Act, 5 adding paragraph (c)(495) to read as
provisions of the Act and applicable U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small follows:
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); Business Regulatory Enforcement
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides § 52.220 Identification of plan—in part.
submissions, the EPA’s role is to that before a rule may take effect, the * * * * *
approve state choices, provided that agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a (c) * * *
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely copy of the rule, to each House of the (495) The following plan was
approves a state plan as meeting federal Congress and to the Comptroller General submitted on November 10, 1993 by the
requirements and does not impose of the United States. The EPA will Governor’s designee.
additional requirements beyond those submit a report containing this action (i) [Reserved]
imposed by state law. For that reason, and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of (ii) Additional material.
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action Representatives, and the Comptroller (A) California Air Resources Board.
subject to review by the Office of General of the United States prior to (1) Letter and attachments from James
Management and Budget under publication of the rule in the Federal D. Boyd, Executive Officer, California
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, Register. A major rule cannot take effect Air Resources Board, to Felicia Marcus,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, until 60 days after it is published in the Regional Administrator, EPA Region IX,
January 21, 2011); Federal Register. This action is not a November 10, 1993.
• does not impose an information ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
collection burden under the provisions 804(2). * * * * *
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean [FR Doc. 2017–20722 Filed 9–27–17; 8:45 am]
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Air Act, petitions for judicial review of BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:07 Sep 27, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM 28SER1

Document Created: 2017-09-28 01:32:44
Document Modified: 2017-09-28 01:32:44

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective October 30, 2017.
Contact		Doris Lo, EPA Region IX, (415) 972- 3959, [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 45191
CFR Associated		Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds