82 FR 45475 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Nonattainment New Source Review Requirements for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 188 (September 29, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 188 (September 29, 2017)
| Page Range | 45475-45479 | |
| FR Document | 2017-20834 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 45475-45479] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-20834] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0398; FRL-9968-5-Region 3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Nonattainment New Source Review Requirements for the 2008 8- Hour Ozone Standard AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final action to approve a revision to the State of Maryland's state implementation plan (SIP). The revision is in response to EPA's February 3, 2017 Findings of Failure to Submit for various requirements relating to the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). This SIP revision is specific to nonattainment new source review (NNSR) requirements. EPA is approving this revision in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: This rule is effective on November 28, 2017 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by October 30, 2017. If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03- OAR-2017-0398 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Amy Johansen, (215) 814-2156, or by email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background On May 8, 2017, the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) submitted on behalf of the State of Maryland a formal revision, requesting EPA's approval for the SIP of its NNSR Certification for the 2008 Ozone Standard (Revision 17-01). The SIP revision is in response to EPA's final 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS Findings of Failure to Submit for NNSR requirements. See 82 FR 9158 (February 3, 2017). Specifically, Maryland is certifying that its existing NNSR program, covering the Baltimore Nonattainment Area (which includes Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, and Howard Counties and the city of Baltimore), the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City Nonattainment Area (which includes Cecil County in Maryland), and the Washington, DC Nonattainment Area (which includes Calvert, Charles, Frederick, Montgomery, and Prince Georges Counties in Maryland) for the 2008 8- hour ozone NAAQS, is at least as stringent as the requirements at 40 CFR 51.165, as amended by the final rule titled ``Implementation of the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards [[Page 45476]] for Ozone: State Implementation Plan Requirements'' (SIP Requirements Rule), for ozone and its precursors.\1\ See 80 FR 12264 (March 6, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The SIP Requirements Rule addresses a range of nonattainment area SIP requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, including requirements pertaining to attainment demonstrations, reasonable further progress (RFP), reasonably available control technology, reasonably available control measures, major new source review, emission inventories, and the timing of SIP submissions and of compliance with emission control measures in the SIP. The rule also revokes the 1997 ozone NAAQS and establishes anti-backsliding requirements. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS On March 12, 2008, EPA promulgated a revised 8-hour ozone NAAQS of 0.075 parts per million (ppm). See 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 2008). Under EPA's regulations at 40 CFR 50.15, the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS is attained when the 3-year average of the annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ambient air quality ozone concentrations is less than or equal to 0.075 ppm. Upon promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, the CAA requires EPA to designate as nonattainment any area that is violating the NAAQS based on the three most recent years of ambient air quality data at the conclusion of the designation process. The Philadelphia-Wilmington- Atlantic City Area and the Washington, DC Area were classified as marginal nonattainment areas, and the Baltimore Area was classified as a moderate nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS on May 21, 2012 (effective July 20, 2012) using 2008-2010 ambient air quality data. See 77 FR 30088. On March 6, 2015, EPA issued the final SIP Requirements Rule, which establishes the requirements that state, tribal, and local air quality management agencies must meet as they develop implementation plans for areas where air quality exceeds the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. See 80 FR 12264. Areas that were designated as marginal ozone nonattainment areas were required to attain the 2008 8- hour ozone NAAQS no later than July 20, 2015, based on 2012-2014 monitoring data. See 40 CFR 51.1103. The Philadelphia-Wilmington- Atlantic City Area and the Washington, DC Area did not attain the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS by July 20, 2015; however, these areas did meet the CAA section 181(a)(5) criteria, as interpreted in 40 CFR 51.1107, for a 1-year attainment date extension. See 81 FR 26697 (May 4, 2016). Therefore, on April 11, 2016, the EPA Administrator signed a final rule extending the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City Area and the Washington, DC Area 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS attainment date from July 20, 2015 to July 20, 2016.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ EPA proposed approval of a Determination of Attainment (DOA) for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Philadelphia-Wilmington- Atlantic City Area and the Washington, DC Area on April 18, 2017 and April 25, 2017, respectively. These proposed actions were based on complete, certified, and quality assured ambient air quality monitoring data for the 2013-2015 monitoring period. See 82 FR 18268 (April 18, 2017) and 82 FR 19011 (April 25, 2017). It should be noted that a DOA does not alleviate the need for Maryland to certify that their existing SIP approved NNSR program is as stringent as the requirements at 40 CFR 51.165, as NNSR applies in nonattainment areas until an area has been redesignated to attainment. EPA expects to finalize the April 18, 2017 and April 25, 2017 DOAs in future rulemaking actions. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Moderate areas, such as the Baltimore Area, are required to attain the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS no later than July 20, 2018, six years after the effective date of the initial nonattainment designations.\3\ See 40 CFR 51.1103. The statutorily required DOA, for the Baltimore Area, which is due prior to the attainment date for the Area, has not passed and will be addressed in a future rulemaking action. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ On June 1, 2015, EPA finalized a clean data determination (CDD) for the Baltimore Area. This determination was based upon complete, quality-assured, and certified ambient air quality monitoring data that shows the Baltimore Area has monitored attainment of the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the 2012-2014 monitoring period. As a result of this determination, the requirement for the Baltimore Area to submit an attainment demonstration and associated reasonably available control measures (RACM), reasonable further progress plans (RFP), contingency measures, and other SIP revisions related to attainment of the standard are suspended for as long as the area continues to attain the 2008 8-hour ozone standard. See 80 FR 30941 (June 2, 2015). This action did not alleviate the need for Maryland to submit a NNSR Certification SIP revision, which is the subject of this rulemaking action. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Based on initial nonattainment designations for the 2008 8-hour ozone standard, as well as the March 6, 2015 final SIP Requirements Rule, Maryland was required to develop a SIP revision addressing certain CAA requirements for the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, Washington, DC, and Baltimore Areas, and submit to EPA a NNSR Certification SIP or SIP revision no later than 36 months after the effective date of area designations for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS (i.e., July 20, 2015). See 80 FR 12264 (March 6, 2015). EPA is taking action on Maryland's May 8, 2017 NNSR Certification SIP revision. EPA's analysis of how this SIP revision addresses the NNSR requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS is provided in Section II below. B. 2017 Findings of Failure To Submit SIP for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Areas designated nonattainment for the ozone NAAQS are subject to the general nonattainment area planning requirements of CAA section 172 and also to the ozone-specific planning requirements of CAA section 182.\4\ States in the ozone transport region (OTR), such as Maryland, are additionally subject to the requirements outlined in CAA section 184. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ Ozone nonattainment areas are classified based on the severity of their ozone levels (as determined based on the area's ``design value,'' which represents air quality in the area for the most recent 3 years). The possible classifications for ozone nonattainment areas are Marginal, Moderate, Serious, Severe, and Extreme. See CAA section 181(a)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ozone nonattainment areas in the lower classification levels have fewer and/or less stringent mandatory air quality planning and control requirements than those in higher classifications. For a marginal area, such as the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City Area and the Washington, DC Area, a state is required to submit a baseline emissions inventory, adopt a SIP requiring emissions statements from stationary sources, and implement a NNSR program for the relevant ozone standard. See CAA section 182(a). For a moderate area, such as the Baltimore Area, a state needs to comply with the marginal area requirements, plus additional requirements, including the requirement to submit a demonstration that the area will attain in 6 years, the requirement to adopt and implement certain emissions controls, such as reasonably available control technology (RACT), and the requirement for greater emissions offsets for new or modified major stationary sources under the state's NNSR program. For each higher ozone nonattainment classification, a state needs to comply with all lower area classification requirements, plus additional emissions controls and more expansive NNSR offset requirements. The CAA sets out specific requirements for states in the OTR.\5\ Upon promulgation of the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, states in the OTR were required to submit a SIP revision for RACT. See 40 CFR 51.1116. This requirement is the only recurring obligation for an OTR state upon revision of a NAAQS, unless that state also contains some portion of a nonattainment area for the revised NAAQS. In that case, the nonattainment requirements described previously also apply to those portions of that state. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ CAA section 184 details specific requirements for a group of states (and the District of Columbia) that make up the OTR. States in the OTR are required to submit RACT SIP revisions and mandate a certain level of emissions control for the pollutants that form ozone, even if the areas in the state meet the ozone standards. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the March 6, 2015 SIP Requirements Rule, EPA detailed the [[Page 45477]] requirements applicable to ozone nonattainment areas, as well as requirements that apply in the OTR, and provided specific deadlines for SIP submittals. On February 3, 2017, EPA found that 15 states and the District of Columbia failed to submit SIP revisions in a timely manner to satisfy certain requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS that apply to nonattainment areas and/or states in the OTR. See 82 FR 9158. As explained in that rulemaking action, consistent with the CAA and EPA regulations, these findings of failure to submit established certain deadlines for the imposition of sanctions, if a state does not submit a timely SIP revision addressing the requirements for which the finding is being made, and for the EPA to promulgate a federal implementation plan (FIP) to address any outstanding SIP requirements. EPA found that the State of Maryland failed to submit SIP revisions in a timely matter to satisfy NNSR requirements for its marginal and moderate nonattainment areas, specifically the Philadelphia-Wilmington- Atlantic City Area, the Washington, DC Area, and the Baltimore Area.\6\ Maryland submitted its May 8, 2017 SIP revision to address the specific NNSR requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, located in 40 CFR 51.160-165, as well as its obligations under EPA's February 3, 2017 Findings of Failure to Submit. EPA's analysis of how this SIP revision addresses the NNSR requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS and the Findings of Failure to Submit is provided in Section II below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ The EPA found that the State of Maryland also failed to submit SIP revisions for inspection and maintenance (I/M) basic and nitrogen oxide RACT for major sources. These SIP requirements will be addressed in separate rulemaking actions and will not be discussed here. See 82 FR 9158 (February 3, 2017). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis This rulemaking action is specific to Maryland's NNSR requirements. NNSR is a preconstruction review permit program that applies to new major stationary sources or major modifications at existing sources located in a nonattainment area.\7\ The specific NNSR requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS are located in 40 CFR 51.160-165. The SIP Requirements Rule explained that, for each nonattainment area, a NNSR plan or plan revision was due no later than 36 months after the effective date of area designations for the 2008 8-hour ozone standard (i.e., July 20, 2015).\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See CAA sections 172(c)(5), 173 and 182. \8\ With respect to states with nonattainment areas subject to a finding of failure to submit NNSR SIP revisions, such revisions would no longer be required if the area were redesignated to attainment. The CAA's prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) program requirements apply in lieu of NNSR after an area is redesignated to attainment. For areas outside the OTR, NNSR requirements do not apply in areas designated as attainment. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The minimum SIP requirements for NNSR permitting programs for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS are located in 40 CFR 51.165. See 40 CFR 51.1114. These NNSR program requirements include those promulgated in the ``Phase 2 Rule'' implementing the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS (75 FR 71018 (November 29, 2005)) and the SIP Requirements Rule implementing the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Under the Phase 2 Rule, the SIP for each ozone nonattainment area must contain NNSR provisions that: Set major source thresholds for oxides of nitrogen (NOX ) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(iv)(A)(1)(i)- (iv) and (2); classify physical changes as a major source if the change would constitute a major source by itself pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(iv)(A)(3); consider any significant net emissions increase of NOX as a significant net emissions increase for ozone pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(v)(E); consider certain increases of VOC emissions in extreme ozone nonattainment areas as a significant net emissions increase and a major modification for ozone pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(v)(F); set significant emissions rates for VOC and NOX as ozone precursors pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(x)(A)-(C) and (E); contain provisions for emissions reductions credits pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(3)(ii)(C)(1)-(2); provide that the requirements applicable to VOC also apply to NOX pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(8); and set offset ratios for VOC and NOX pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(9)(i)-(iii) (renumbered as (a)(9)(ii)-(iv) under the SIP Requirements Rule for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS). Under the SIP Requirements Rule for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, the SIP for each ozone nonattainment area designated nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS and designated nonattainment for the 1997 ozone NAAQS on April 6, 2015, must also contain NNSR provisions that include the anti-backsliding requirements at 40 CFR 51.1105. See 40 CFR 51.165(a)(12). Maryland's longstanding SIP approved NNSR program, established in Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) Air Quality Rule COMAR 26.11.17-- Nonattainment Provisions for Major New Sources and Major Modifications, applies to the construction and modification of major stationary sources in nonattainment areas. In its May 8, 2017 SIP revision, Maryland certifies that the version of the Air Quality Rule COMAR 26.11.17 in the SIP is at least as stringent as the federal NNSR requirements for the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City Area, the Washington, DC Area, and the Baltimore Area. EPA last approved revisions to the SIP approved version of Maryland's NNSR rule in 2012 addressing, among other things, NSR Reform and NOX as a precursor to ozone. See 77 FR 45949 (August 2, 2012).\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ On August 30, 2012, EPA published a rulemaking correcting minor errors in their August 2, 2012 final rule. The correction of these errors did not change EPA's final action to approve the Maryland regulations. See 77 FR 52605. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- EPA notes that neither COMAR 26.11.17 nor Maryland's approved SIP have the regulatory provision for any emissions change of VOC in extreme nonattainment areas, specified in 40 CFR 51165(a)(1)(v)(F), because Maryland has never had an area designated extreme nonattainment for any of the ozone NAAQS. Thus, the Maryland SIP is not required to have this requirement for VOC in extreme nonattainment areas until such time as Maryland has an extreme ozone nonattainment area. Additionally, there are no anti-backsliding provisions found in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(12) in either COMAR 26.11.17 or the Maryland SIP because Maryland's major stationary source thresholds were established for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS nonattainment designations, which were and continue to be more stringent. Thus, antibacksliding requirements are not required. Maryland has not changed these major stationary source threshold provisions in COMAR 26.11.17.01(17), so they remain in Maryland's federally-approved SIP.\10\ All of the sources located in the 2008 8- hour ozone nonattainment areas in Maryland are required to meet a major stationary source threshold of 25 tons or more per year of VOC or NOX . --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ Under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, the Baltimore Area was classified as serious nonattainment and the Philadelphia-Wilmington- Atlantic City and Washington, DC Areas were classified as moderate nonattainment. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The version of COMAR 26.11.17 that is contained in the current SIP has not changed since the 2012 rulemaking where EPA last approved Maryland's NNSR provisions. This version of the rule covers the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, Washington, DC, and Baltimore Nonattainment Areas [[Page 45478]] and remains adequate to meet all applicable NNSR requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS in 40 CFR 51.165, the Phase 2 Rule and the SIP Requirements Rule. A detailed description of the state submittal and EPA's evaluation is included in a technical support document (TSD) prepared in support of this rulemaking action. A copy of the TSD is available, upon request, from the EPA Regional Office listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document or is also available electronically within the Docket for this rulemaking action. III. Final Action EPA is approving Maryland's May 8, 2017 SIP revision addressing the NNSR requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS for the Philadelphia- Wilmington-Atlantic City, Washington, DC, and Baltimore Areas. EPA has concluded that the State's submission fulfills the 40 CFR 51.1114 revision requirement, meets the requirements of CAA sections 110 and 172 and the minimum SIP requirements of 40 CFR 51.165, as well as its obligations under EPA's February 3, 2017 Findings of Failure to Submit. EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because EPA views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal Register, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision if adverse comments are filed. This rule will be effective on November 28, 2017 without further notice unless EPA receives adverse comment by October 30, 2017. If EPA receives adverse comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. General Requirements Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). C. Petitions for Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 28, 2017. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking action. This action approving Maryland's 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS Certification SIP revision for NNSR may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: September 14, 2017. Cecil Rodrigues, Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart V--Maryland 0 2. In Sec. 52.1070, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding the entry ``2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Nonattainment New Source Review [[Page 45479]] Requirements'' at the end of the table to read as follows: Sec. 52.1070 Identification of plan. * * * * * (e) * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of non-regulatory SIP Applicable State Additional revision geographic area submittal date EPA approval date explanation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS The Baltimore Area 5/8/17 9/29/17 [insert Nonattainment New Source Review (includes Anne Federal Register Requirements. Arundel, citation]. Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, and Howard Counties and the city of Baltimore), the Philadelphia- Wilmington- Atlantic City Area (includes Cecil County in Maryland), and the Washington, DC Area (includes Calvert, Charles, Frederick, Montgomery, and Prince Georges Counties in Maryland). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [FR Doc. 2017-20834 Filed 9-28-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 188 / Friday, September 29, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 45475
TABLE 1—EPA-APPROVED NORTH CAROLINA REGULATIONS
State effective
State citation Title/subject EPA approval date Explanation
date
* * * * * * *
Subchapter 2Q Air Quality Permits
* * * * * * *
Section .0800 Exclusionary Rules
* * * * * * *
Sect .0809 ......... Concrete Batch Plants .................. 4/1/2004 9/27/2017, [insert Federal Reg-
ister citation].
* * * * * * *
Section .0900 Permit Exemptions
Sect .0901 ......... Purpose and Scope ...................... 1/1/2005 9/27/2017, [insert Federal Reg-
ister citation].
Sect .0902 ......... Portable Crushers ......................... 1/1/2005 9/27/2017, [insert Federal Reg-
ister citation].
* * * * * written comment by October 30, 2017. making effective comments, please visit
[FR Doc. 2017–20325 Filed 9–28–17; 8:45 am] If EPA receives such comments, it will http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P publish a timely withdrawal of the commenting-epa-dockets.
direct final rule in the Federal Register FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs.
and inform the public that the rule will Amy Johansen, (215) 814–2156, or by
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION not take effect. email at johansen.amy@epa.gov.
AGENCY ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
40 CFR Part 52 identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
OAR–2017–0398 at https:// I. Background
[EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0398; FRL–9968–5– www.regulations.gov, or via email to On May 8, 2017, the Maryland
Region 3] aquino.marcos@epa.gov. For comments Department of the Environment (MDE)
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the submitted on behalf of the State of
Approval and Promulgation of Air
online instructions for submitting Maryland a formal revision, requesting
Quality Implementation Plans;
comments. Once submitted, comments EPA’s approval for the SIP of its NNSR
Maryland; Nonattainment New Source
cannot be edited or removed from Certification for the 2008 Ozone
Review Requirements for the 2008 8-
Regulations.gov. For either manner of Standard (Revision 17–01). The SIP
Hour Ozone Standard
submission, EPA may publish any revision is in response to EPA’s final
AGENCY: Environmental Protection comment received to its public docket. 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS Findings of
Agency (EPA). Do not submit electronically any Failure to Submit for NNSR
ACTION: Direct final rule. information you consider to be requirements. See 82 FR 9158 (February
confidential business information (CBI) 3, 2017). Specifically, Maryland is
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection or other information whose disclosure is certifying that its existing NNSR
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final restricted by statute. Multimedia program, covering the Baltimore
action to approve a revision to the State submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be Nonattainment Area (which includes
of Maryland’s state implementation plan accompanied by a written comment. Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll,
(SIP). The revision is in response to The written comment is considered the Harford, and Howard Counties and the
EPA’s February 3, 2017 Findings of official comment and should include city of Baltimore), the Philadelphia-
Failure to Submit for various discussion of all points you wish to Wilmington-Atlantic City
requirements relating to the 2008 8-hour make. EPA will generally not consider Nonattainment Area (which includes
ozone national ambient air quality comments or comment contents located Cecil County in Maryland), and the
standards (NAAQS). This SIP revision is outside of the primary submission (i.e. Washington, DC Nonattainment Area
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES
specific to nonattainment new source on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing (which includes Calvert, Charles,
review (NNSR) requirements. EPA is system). For additional submission Frederick, Montgomery, and Prince
approving this revision in accordance methods, please contact the person Georges Counties in Maryland) for the
with the requirements of the Clean Air identified in the FOR FURTHER 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, is at least
Act (CAA). INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the as stringent as the requirements at 40
DATES: This rule is effective on full EPA public comment policy, CFR 51.165, as amended by the final
November 28, 2017 without further information about CBI or multimedia rule titled ‘‘Implementation of the 2008
notice, unless EPA receives adverse submissions, and general guidance on National Ambient Air Quality Standards
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:55 Sep 28, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\29SER1.SGM 29SER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_45663/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 188 / Friday, September 29, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 45479
Requirements’’ at the end of the table to § 52.1070 Identification of plan. (e) * * *
read as follows: * * * * *
State EPA
Name of non-regulatory SIP Additional
Applicable geographic area submittal approval
revision explanation
date date
* * * * * * *
2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS The Baltimore Area (includes 5/8/17 9/29/17 [insert Federal Reg-
Nonattainment New Source Anne Arundel, Baltimore, ister citation].
Review Requirements. Carroll, Harford, and How-
ard Counties and the city of
Baltimore), the Philadel-
phia-Wilmington-Atlantic
City Area (includes Cecil
County in Maryland), and
the Washington, DC Area
(includes Calvert, Charles,
Frederick, Montgomery,
and Prince Georges Coun-
ties in Maryland).
[FR Doc. 2017–20834 Filed 9–28–17; 8:45 am] receives adverse comment, we will provides additional information by
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P publish a timely withdrawal of the addressing the following:
direct final rule in the Federal Register I. What is being addressed in this document?
informing the public that the rule will II. Have the requirements for approval of a
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION not take effect. SIP revision been met?
AGENCY ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
40 CFR Part 52 identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2017–0517, to https:// I. What is being addressed in this
[EPA–R07–OAR–2017–0517; FRL–9968–66– www.regulations.gov. Follow the online document?
Region 7] instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be EPA is approving elements of the
Approval of Iowa Air Quality 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS infrastructure SIP
Implementation Plans; Elements of the edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received submission from the State of Iowa,
Infrastructure SIP Requirements for dated December 15, 2015, and received
the 2012 Annual Fine Particulate Matter to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you on December 22, 2015. Specifically,
(PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality EPA is approving the following
Standard (NAAQS) consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information elements of section 110(a)(2): (A), (B),
AGENCY: Environmental Protection whose disclosure is restricted by statute. (C), (D)(i)(II)—prevent significant
Agency (EPA). Multimedia submissions (audio, video, deterioration of air quality (prong 3),
ACTION: Direct final rule. etc.) must be accompanied by a written (D)(ii) (E) through (H), and (J) through
comment. The written comment is (M).
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection considered the official comment and A Technical Support Document (TSD)
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final should include discussion of all points is included as part of the docket to
action to approve elements of a State you wish to make. EPA will generally discuss the details of this action,
Implementation Plan (SIP) submission, not consider comments or comment including analysis of how the SIP meets
for the 2012 Annual Fine Particulate contents located outside of the primary the applicable 110 requirements for
Matter (PM2.5) National Ambient Air submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or infrastructure SIPs.
Quality Standard (NAAQS). other file sharing system). For
Infrastructure SIPs address the II. Have the requirements for approval
additional submission methods, the full of a SIP revision been met?
applicable requirements of Clean Air EPA public comment policy,
Act (CAA) section 110, which requires information about CBI or multimedia The state submission has met the
that each state adopt and submit a SIP public notice requirements for SIP
submissions, and general guidance on
for the implementation, maintenance, submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
making effective comments, please visit
and enforcement of each new or revised 51.102. The state held a 30-day
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
NAAQS promulgated by the EPA. These comment period, and a public hearing
commenting-epa-dockets.
SIPs are commonly referred to as on November 16, 2015. No oral or
‘‘infrastructure’’ SIPs. The infrastructure FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: written comments were received. This
requirements are designed to ensure that Heather Hamilton, Air Planning and submission also satisfied the
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES
the structural components of each Development Branch, U.S. completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51,
state’s air quality management program Environmental Protection Agency, appendix V. In addition, as explained
are adequate to meet the state’s Region 7, 11201 Renner Boulevard, above and in more detail in the
responsibilities under the CAA. Lenexa, KS 66219 at (913) 551–7039, or technical support document which is
DATES: This direct final rule is effective by email at hamilton.heather@epa.gov. part of this docket, the revision meets
November 28, 2017, without further SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the substantive SIP requirements of the
notice, unless EPA receives adverse Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ CAA, including section 110 and
comment by October 30, 2017. If EPA and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section implementing regulations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:55 Sep 28, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\29SER1.SGM 29SER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_45663/page/5.svg)
Document Created: 2017-09-29 03:26:54
Document Modified: 2017-09-29 03:26:54
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective on November 28, 2017 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by October 30, 2017. If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | Mrs. Amy Johansen, (215) 814-2156, or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 45475 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR