82_FR_45795 82 FR 45607 - Record of Decision for the Cape Wind Energy Project

82 FR 45607 - Record of Decision for the Cape Wind Energy Project

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 188 (September 29, 2017)

Page Range45607-45608
FR Document2017-20936

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) is announcing the availability of a Record of Decision (ROD) for the Cape Wind Energy Project Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) in this Notice of Availability (NOA). The SEIS was prepared in response to a 2016 remand order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. Hopper, 827 F.3d 1077 (D.C. Cir. 2016), in which the Court vacated the 2009 Cape Wind Energy Project Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and ordered BOEM to supplement the EIS with adequate geological surveys before Cape Wind Associates LLC (Cape Wind) may begin construction. The SEIS presented two alternatives: The Proposed Action (affirming BOEM's issuance of the existing lease) and the No Action Alternative (requiring BOEM to rescind lease issuance). BOEM has decided to select the Proposed Action Alternative.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 188 (Friday, September 29, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45607-45608]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20936]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

[Docket No. BOEM-2017-0059; MMAA104000]


Record of Decision for the Cape Wind Energy Project

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability of a Record of Decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) is announcing the 
availability of a Record of Decision (ROD) for the Cape Wind Energy 
Project Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) in 
this Notice of Availability (NOA). The SEIS was prepared in response to 
a 2016 remand order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of 
Columbia Circuit in Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility 
v. Hopper, 827 F.3d 1077 (D.C. Cir. 2016), in which the Court vacated 
the 2009 Cape Wind Energy Project Final Environmental Impact Statement 
(EIS) and ordered BOEM to supplement the EIS with adequate geological 
surveys before Cape Wind Associates LLC (Cape Wind) may begin 
construction. The SEIS presented two alternatives: The Proposed Action 
(affirming BOEM's issuance of the existing lease) and the No Action 
Alternative (requiring BOEM to rescind lease issuance). BOEM has 
decided to select the Proposed Action Alternative.

ADDRESSES: The ROD and associated information are available on BOEM's 
Web site at https://www.boem.gov/Massachusetts-Cape-Wind/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For more information on the ROD, you 
may

[[Page 45608]]

contact Mr. James Bennett, Program Manager, Office of Renewable Energy 
Programs, by telephone at 703-787-1300 or by email at 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 5, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals 
for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated the 2009 Cape Wind Energy 
Project Final EIS and ordered that BOEM: ``supplement [the EIS] with 
adequate geological surveys before Cape Wind may begin construction.'' 
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. Hopper, 827 F.3d 
1077, 1084 (D.C. Cir. 2016). The Court opined that: ``[w]ithout 
adequate geological surveys, the [BOEM] cannot `ensure that the 
seafloor [will be] able to support' wind turbines.'' Id. at 1083. While 
the Court found that: ``[BOEM] therefore had violated NEPA (National 
Environmental Policy Act)'' the Court noted that ``. . . [it] does not 
necessarily mean that the project must be halted or that Cape Wind must 
redo the regulatory approval process.'' Id. at 1083-4. The Court 
explicitly left undisturbed BOEM's 2010 decision to issue the lease and 
BOEM's 2011 decision to approve the Construction and Operations Plan 
(COP). Id. at 1084. In light of the remand order and the remaining 
valid lease and COP, only two alternatives remain relevant to the 
court's remand: The Proposed Action (affirming BOEM's issuance of the 
existing lease) and the No Action Alternative (BOEM rescinding the 
lease). In its Final SEIS, BOEM examines the available geological 
survey data, including the geotechnical data and reports submitted to 
BOEM since the 2009 Final EIS, any other relevant data that relates to 
the adequacy of the seafloor to support wind turbines in the lease 
area, and considers public comments.
    On March 31, 2017, BOEM published the Draft SEIS, in response to 
the Court's 2016 remand order discussed above, and a NOA in the Federal 
Register to announce the availability of the Draft SEIS and initiate a 
45-day public comment period (82 FR 16060). Comments received can be 
found at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for docket ID BOEM-
2017-0008. The Final SEIS addressed comments received by BOEM in 
response to the Draft SEIS during the 45-day comment period. On August 
4, 2017 (82 FR 36418), BOEM published a NOA announcing the availability 
of the Final SEIS in the Federal Register. The Final SEIS can be found 
on BOEM's Web site at: https://www.boem.gov/Massachusetts-Cape-Wind/.

    Authority: This notice is published pursuant to the regulations 
(40 CFR part 1506.6(b)) implementing the provisions of the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 
seq.).

    Dated: September 26, 2017.
Walter D. Cruickshank,
Acting Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.
[FR Doc. 2017-20936 Filed 9-28-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P



                                                                                Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 188 / Friday, September 29, 2017 / Notices                                                45607

                                                    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                           The BLM seeks resource information                 process and, if eligible, may request or
                                                    Bradley Johnson, Planning &                             and data for public land values (e.g., air            be requested by the BLM to participate
                                                    Environmental Coordinator, telephone:                   quality, cultural and historic resources,             as a cooperating agency.
                                                    307–578–5928; address: 1002 Blackburn                   fire/fuels, fisheries, forestry, lands and              Before including your address, phone
                                                    Street, Cody, Wyoming 82414; email:                     realty, non-energy minerals and geology,              number, email address or other personal
                                                    bbjohnson@blm.gov. Persons who use a                    oil and gas, paleontology, rangeland                  identifying information in your
                                                    telecommunications device for the deaf                  management, recreation, soil, water, and              comment, you should be aware that
                                                    (TDD) may call the Federal Relay                        wildlife) in the project area. As                     your entire comment—including your
                                                    Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to                      proposed, approximately 48 percent of                 personal identifying information—may
                                                    contact Mr. Johnson during normal                       the project area would take place on                  be made publicly available at any time.
                                                    business hours. The FRS is available 24                 BLM-managed public lands. The                         While you may ask us in your comment
                                                    hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a                  proposed dam and nearly the entirety of               to withhold your personal identifying
                                                    message or question with the above                      the expanded reservoir would reside on                information from public review, we
                                                    individual. You will receive a reply                    BLM lands. The proposed pipeline and                  cannot guarantee that we will be able to
                                                    during normal business hours. You may                   borrow areas both cross or take place                 do so.
                                                    call either of these numbers to have                    nearly in their entirety on private lands.              Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7.
                                                    your name added to the project mailing                  The purpose of this request is to ensure
                                                                                                            that the project analysis has sufficient              Mary Jo Rugwell,
                                                    list.
                                                                                                            information and data to consider a                    BLM Wyoming State Director.
                                                    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:     This                     reasonable range of resource uses,                    [FR Doc. 2017–21140 Filed 9–28–17; 8:45 am]
                                                    Notice initiates the public scoping                     management options, and alternatives                  BILLING CODE 4310–22–P
                                                    process for the EIS. The BLM intends to                 for managing public lands.
                                                    prepare an EIS to support the decision                     Please submit information to the Cody
                                                    making for the proposed Project and                     Field Manager at the address above. The               DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
                                                    conduct a public scoping period to seek                 BLM will treat proprietary information
                                                    input on the preliminary issues                         submissions marked as ‘‘Confidential’’                Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
                                                    identified regarding this proposal. The                 in accordance with the laws and                       [Docket No. BOEM–2017–0059;
                                                    Wyoming Water Development                               regulations governing the                             MMAA104000]
                                                    Commission proposes to enlarge the                      confidentiality of such information. To
                                                    water storage capacity of Leavitt                       provide the public with an opportunity                Record of Decision for the Cape Wind
                                                    Reservoir to a total capacity of 6,604                  to review the proposal and associated                 Energy Project
                                                    acre feet for the purposes of multiple                  information, as well as any proposed
                                                                                                            plan amendments, the BLM will host                    AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy
                                                    use that include late season irrigation,                                                                      Management, Interior.
                                                    flood attenuation and recreation. A 1.5-                meetings before October 30, 2017. The
                                                                                                            BLM will notify the public of meetings                ACTION: Notice of availability of a
                                                    mile sub-surface pipeline from Beaver
                                                                                                            and any other opportunities for the                   Record of Decision.
                                                    Creek will divert water to the reservoir
                                                    inlet via a 42-inch diameter pipeline                   public to be involved in the process for              SUMMARY:   The Bureau of Ocean Energy
                                                    across private lands. A permanent sub-                  this proposal at least 15 days prior to               Management (BOEM) is announcing the
                                                    surface transfer pipeline, approximately                the event. Meeting dates, locations and               availability of a Record of Decision
                                                    three miles long, is proposed                           times will be announced by a news                     (ROD) for the Cape Wind Energy Project
                                                    downstream in the Beaver Creek                          release to the media, individual                      Final Supplemental Environmental
                                                    drainage to efficiently convey reservoir                emailings, and postings on the project                Impact Statement (SEIS) in this Notice
                                                    release water to irrigation                             Web site. The purpose of the public
                                                                                                                                                                  of Availability (NOA). The SEIS was
                                                    infrastructure.The proposal area is                     scoping process is to determine relevant
                                                                                                                                                                  prepared in response to a 2016 remand
                                                    between the towns of Greybull and                       issues that will influence the scope of
                                                                                                                                                                  order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for
                                                    Shell, Wyoming, in the Sixth Principal                  the environmental analysis, including
                                                                                                                                                                  the District of Columbia Circuit in
                                                    Meridian, Wyoming, T. 54 N., R. 92 W.,                  alternatives, and guide the process for
                                                                                                                                                                  Public Employees for Environmental
                                                    sec. 13, NW1/4SW1/4 and SW1/4SW1/                       developing the EIS.
                                                                                                               The BLM will use and coordinate the                Responsibility v. Hopper, 827 F.3d 1077
                                                    4; sec. 14, NE1/4SE1/4 and SE1/4SE1/4;                                                                        (D.C. Cir. 2016), in which the Court
                                                                                                            NEPA commenting process to help
                                                    sec. 23, NE1/4NE1/4 and SE1/4NE1/4;                                                                           vacated the 2009 Cape Wind Energy
                                                                                                            fulfill the public involvement process
                                                    sec. 24, lots 3 and 4, SW1/4NW1/4, SE1/                                                                       Project Final Environmental Impact
                                                                                                            under Section 106 of the National
                                                    4NW1/4, NW1/4SW1/4, NE1/4SW1/4,                                                                               Statement (EIS) and ordered BOEM to
                                                                                                            Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) (54
                                                    and SW1/4SE1/4.                                         U.S.C. 306108), as provided for in 36                 supplement the EIS with adequate
                                                       Preliminary issues include: Potential                CFR 800.2(d)(3). The information about                geological surveys before Cape Wind
                                                    impacts to wetlands and cultural sites                  historic and cultural resources in the                Associates LLC (Cape Wind) may begin
                                                    (properties), ground and surface waters,                area potentially affected by the proposal             construction. The SEIS presented two
                                                    mineral development, wildlife habitat,                  will assist the lead agency in identifying            alternatives: The Proposed Action
                                                    and the county road right-of-way. The                   and evaluating impacts to such                        (affirming BOEM’s issuance of the
                                                    BLM will identify, analyze, and require                 resources in the context of both NEPA                 existing lease) and the No Action
                                                                                                                                                                  Alternative (requiring BOEM to rescind
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES




                                                    mitigation, as appropriate, to address                  and Section 106 of the NHPA. Native
                                                    the reasonably foreseeable impacts to                   American tribal consultations will be                 lease issuance). BOEM has decided to
                                                    resources from the approval of this                     conducted in accordance with policy,                  select the Proposed Action Alternative.
                                                    Project. Mitigation may include                         and tribal concerns will be given due                 ADDRESSES: The ROD and associated
                                                    avoidance, minimization, rectification,                 consideration. Federal, state and local               information are available on BOEM’s
                                                    reduction or elimination over time, and                 agencies, along with other stakeholders               Web site at https://www.boem.gov/
                                                    compensatory mitigation; and may be                     that may be interested or affected by the             Massachusetts-Cape-Wind/.
                                                    considered at multiple scales, including                BLM’s decisions on this proposal, are                 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
                                                    the landscape-scale.                                    invited to participate in the scoping                 more information on the ROD, you may


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:50 Sep 28, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00033   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM   29SEN1


                                                    45608                       Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 188 / Friday, September 29, 2017 / Notices

                                                    contact Mr. James Bennett, Program                        Authority: This notice is published                 section 337 based upon the importation
                                                    Manager, Office of Renewable Energy                     pursuant to the regulations (40 CFR part              into the United States, the sale for
                                                    Programs, by telephone at 703–787–                      1506.6(b)) implementing the provisions of             importation, and the sale within the
                                                    1300 or by email at james.bennett@                      the National Environmental Policy Act of              United States after importation of
                                                                                                            1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
                                                    boem.gov.                                                                                                     certain height-adjustable desk platforms
                                                                                                             Dated: September 26, 2017.                           and components thereof by reason of
                                                    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 5,
                                                    2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the                 Walter D. Cruickshank,                                infringement of U.S. Patent No.
                                                    District of Columbia Circuit vacated the                Acting Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy               9,113,703; U.S. Patent No. 9,277,809;
                                                    2009 Cape Wind Energy Project Final                     Management.                                           and U.S. Patent No. 9,554,644. The
                                                    EIS and ordered that BOEM:                              [FR Doc. 2017–20936 Filed 9–28–17; 8:45 am]           complaint further alleges that an
                                                    ‘‘supplement [the EIS] with adequate                    BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P                                industry in the United States exists as
                                                    geological surveys before Cape Wind                                                                           required by section 337. The
                                                    may begin construction.’’ Public                                                                              Commission’s notice of investigation
                                                    Employees for Environmental                             INTERNATIONAL TRADE                                   named Lumi Legend Corporation of
                                                    Responsibility v. Hopper, 827 F.3d 1077,                COMMISSION                                            Ningbo, China; Innovative Office
                                                    1084 (D.C. Cir. 2016). The Court opined                                                                       Products LLC of Easton, Pennsylvania;
                                                                                                            [Investigation No. 337–TA–1054]                       Ergotech Group LLC of Easton,
                                                    that: ‘‘[w]ithout adequate geological
                                                    surveys, the [BOEM] cannot ‘ensure that                 Certain Height-Adjustable Desk                        Pennsylvania; Monoprice, Inc. of
                                                    the seafloor [will be] able to support’                 Platforms and Components Thereof;                     Rancho Cucamonga, California; and
                                                    wind turbines.’’ Id. at 1083. While the                 Commission’s Determination Not To                     Transform Partners LLC (dba Mount-It!)
                                                    Court found that: ‘‘[BOEM] therefore                    Review an Initial Determination                       of San Diego, California (collectively
                                                    had violated NEPA (National                             Terminating the Investigation Based                   ‘‘the Lumi Legend respondents’’);
                                                    Environmental Policy Act)’’ the Court                   on Settlement; Termination of the                     Loctek Ergonomic Technology
                                                    noted that ‘‘. . . [it] does not necessarily            Investigation                                         Corporation (formerly, Ningbo Loctek
                                                    mean that the project must be halted or                                                                       Visual Technology Corporation of
                                                    that Cape Wind must redo the                            AGENCY: U.S. International Trade                      Ningbo, China) of Ningbo, China;
                                                    regulatory approval process.’’ Id. at                   Commission.                                           Zhejiang Loctek Smart Drive
                                                    1083–4. The Court explicitly left                       ACTION: Notice.                                       Technology Co., Ltd. of Ningbo, China;
                                                    undisturbed BOEM’s 2010 decision to                                                                           and Loctek Inc.’s (formerly, Zoxou, Inc.
                                                    issue the lease and BOEM’s 2011                         SUMMARY:    Notice is hereby given that               of Fremont, California) of Fremont,
                                                    decision to approve the Construction                    the U.S. International Trade                          California (collectively herein, ‘‘Loctek
                                                    and Operations Plan (COP). Id. at 1084.                 Commission has determined not to                      respondents’’). The Office of Unfair
                                                    In light of the remand order and the                    review the presiding administrative law               Import Investigations did not participate
                                                    remaining valid lease and COP, only                     judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination               in the investigation. The Lumi Legend
                                                    two alternatives remain relevant to the                 (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 10) terminating the               respondents were previously terminated
                                                    court’s remand: The Proposed Action                     investigation based on settlement.                    based on settlement. Order No. 5
                                                    (affirming BOEM’s issuance of the                       FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                      (unreviewed, Commission Notice (July
                                                    existing lease) and the No Action                       Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office                 11, 2017)).
                                                    Alternative (BOEM rescinding the                        of the General Counsel, U.S.                             On August 29, 2017, complainant and
                                                    lease). In its Final SEIS, BOEM                         International Trade Commission, 500 E                 the Loctek respondents filed a joint
                                                    examines the available geological survey                Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,                     motion to terminate the Locktek
                                                    data, including the geotechnical data                   telephone (202) 205–2737. Copies of                   respondents based on settlement. The
                                                    and reports submitted to BOEM since                     non-confidential documents filed in                   motion asserted that there are no other
                                                    the 2009 Final EIS, any other relevant                  connection with this investigation are or             agreements between complainant and
                                                    data that relates to the adequacy of the                will be available for inspection during               the Loctek respondents. The parties
                                                    seafloor to support wind turbines in the                official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15            represented ‘‘there are no other
                                                    lease area, and considers public                        p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.            agreements, written or oral, express or
                                                    comments.                                               International Trade Commission, 500 E                 implied, between these parties
                                                       On March 31, 2017, BOEM published                    Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,                     concerning the subject matter of the
                                                    the Draft SEIS, in response to the                      telephone (202) 205–2000. General                     Investigation.’’ Motion at 1.
                                                    Court’s 2016 remand order discussed                     information concerning the Commission                    On August 31, 2017, the ALJ issued
                                                    above, and a NOA in the Federal                         may also be obtained by accessing its                 an ID (Order No. 10) terminating the
                                                    Register to announce the availability of                Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.             investigation based on settlement of the
                                                    the Draft SEIS and initiate a 45-day                    The public record for this investigation              Loctek respondents. The ALJ found that
                                                    public comment period (82 FR 16060).                    may be viewed on the Commission’s                     all of the requirements of Commission
                                                    Comments received can be found at                       electronic docket (EDIS) at https://                  rule 210.21, 19 CFR 210.21, had been
                                                    http://www.regulations.gov by searching                 edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired                      met and that there were no public
                                                    for docket ID BOEM–2017–0008. The                       persons are advised that information on               interest concerns that would weigh
                                                    Final SEIS addressed comments                           this matter can be obtained by                        against termination. No petitions for
                                                                                                            contacting the Commission’s TDD                       review were filed.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES




                                                    received by BOEM in response to the
                                                    Draft SEIS during the 45-day comment                    terminal on (202) 205–1810.                              The Commission has determined not
                                                    period. On August 4, 2017 (82 FR                        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The                        to review the subject ID and terminates
                                                    36418), BOEM published a NOA                            Commission instituted this investigation              the investigation.
                                                    announcing the availability of the Final                on May 4, 2017 based on a complaint,                     The authority for the Commission’s
                                                    SEIS in the Federal Register. The Final                 filed on behalf of Varidesk LLC of                    determination is contained in section
                                                    SEIS can be found on BOEM’s Web site                    Coppell, Texas (‘‘complainant’’). 82 FR               337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
                                                    at: https://www.boem.gov/                               20919–20 (May 4, 2017). The complaint                 amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
                                                    Massachusetts-Cape-Wind/.                               as supplemented alleges violations of                 210 of the Commission’s Rules of


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:50 Sep 28, 2017   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00034   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM   29SEN1



Document Created: 2017-09-29 03:27:18
Document Modified: 2017-09-29 03:27:18
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice of availability of a Record of Decision.
ContactFor more information on the ROD, you may contact Mr. James Bennett, Program Manager, Office of Renewable Energy Programs, by telephone at 703-787-1300 or by email at [email protected]
FR Citation82 FR 45607 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR