82_FR_46413 82 FR 46222 - Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review: Antidumping Duty Order on Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico

82 FR 46222 - Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review: Antidumping Duty Order on Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 191 (October 4, 2017)

Page Range46222-46223
FR Document2017-21341

The Department of Commerce (Department) is simultaneously initiating and issuing the preliminary results of a changed circumstances review (CCR) of the antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod (wire rod) from Mexico to determine whether ArcelorMittal Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (AMM) is the successor-in- interest to ArcelorMittal Las Truchas, S.A. de C.V. (AMLT). Based on the information on the record, we preliminarily determine that AMM is the successor-in-interest to AMLT. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2017) 
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46222-46223]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21341]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-201-830]


Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances 
Review: Antidumping Duty Order on Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire 
Rod From Mexico

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Department) is simultaneously 
initiating and issuing the preliminary results of a changed 
circumstances review (CCR) of the antidumping duty order on carbon and 
certain alloy steel wire rod (wire rod) from Mexico to determine 
whether ArcelorMittal Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (AMM) is the successor-in-
interest to ArcelorMittal Las Truchas, S.A. de C.V. (AMLT). Based on 
the information on the record, we preliminarily determine that AMM is 
the successor-in-interest to AMLT. Interested parties are invited to 
comment on these preliminary results.

DATES: Applicable October 4, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith Haynes, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5139.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On October 29, 2002, the Department published in the Federal 
Register the antidumping duty order on wire rod from Mexico.\1\ On May 
19, 2016, the Department published its final results of the 2013-2014 
administrative review of the Order, in which it assigned AMLT a 2.59 
percent dumping margin.\2\ On August 15, 2017, AMM, a foreign producer 
of the subject merchandise, requested that the Department initiate and 
conduct a changed circumstance review to determine that AMM is the 
successor-in-interest to AMLT for the purposes of the Order.\3\ On 
September 12, 2017, AMM filed a letter stating it conferred with 
counsel for interested parties to this proceeding, specifically, 
counsel for Nucor Corporation, counsel for Gerdau Ameristeel USA, 
Charter Steel, and Keystone Steel, and counsel for Deacero S.A.P.I. de 
C.V. and Deacero USA (a group which included domestic interested 
parties/petitioners to the Order), at which time they stated they would 
not oppose the August 15, 2017, request.\4\ AMM further requested that 
the Department initiate and conduct an expedited changed circumstances 
review.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Carbon and Certain 
Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, 
Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine, 67 FR 65945 (October 29, 2002) 
(Order).
    \2\ See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 81 FR 31592 
(May 19, 2016).
    \3\ See letter from AMM, ``Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire 
Rod from Mexico: Request for Changed Circumstances Review,'' dated 
August 15, 2017 (CCR Request).
    \4\ See letter from AMM, ``Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire 
Rod from Mexico: Supplement to Request for Changed Circumstances 
Review,'' dated September 12, 2017 (CCR Supplement).
    \5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the Order is carbon and certain alloy 
steel wire rod. The product is currently classified under the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item numbers 
7213.91.3000, 7213.91.3010, 7213.91.3011, 7213.91.3015, 7213.91.3020, 
7213.91.3090, 7213.91.3091, 7213.91.3092, 7213.91.3093, 7213.91.4500, 
7213.91.4510, 7213.91.4590, 7213.91.6000, 7213.91.6010, 7213.91.6090, 
7213.99.0030, 7213.99.0031, 7213.99.0038, 7213.99.0090, 7227.20.0000, 
7227.20.0010, 7227.20.0020, 7227.20.0030, 7227.20.0080, 7227.20.0090, 
7227.20.0095, 7227.90.6010, 7227.90.6020, 7227.90.6030, 7227.90.6035, 
7227.90.6050, 7227.90.6051, 7227.90.6053, 7227.90.6058, 7227.90.6059, 
7227.90.6080, and 7227.90.6085 of the HTSUS. Although the HTSUS numbers 
are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product 
description remains dispositive.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see 
Memorandum from James Maeder, Senior Director performing the duties 
of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations, to Carole Showers, Executive Director, Office of 
Policy, performing the duties of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, ``Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire 
Rod from Mexico Preliminary Decision Memorandum of Changed 
Circumstances Review,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted 
by, these preliminary results (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review

    Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(the Act), and the Department's regulations (19 CFR 351.216 and 
351.221(c)(3)), the Department will conduct a changed circumstances 
review upon receipt of information concerning, or a request from an 
interested party for a review of, an order which shows changed 
circumstances sufficient to warrant a review of the order. Generally, 
in the past, the Department has used CCRs to address the applicability 
of cash deposit rates after there have been changes in the name or 
structure of a respondent, such as a merger or spinoff (i.e., 
successor-in-interest, or successorship determinations).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See, e.g., Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether 
or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review, 81 FR 91909 (December 
19, 2016) (Solar Cells PRC 2016 CCR Final).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 46223]]

    Specifically, AMM states that as of May 2, 2017, AMLT, which 
received its own cash deposit rate as a mandatory respondent in the 
most recently completed administrative review of the Order, entered 
into a purchase and sale agreement (Agreement) with AMM, under which 
nearly all AMLT's assets and commercial relationships were sold to 
AMM.\8\ Thus, consistent with Department practice, we find the 
information submitted by AMM demonstrates changed circumstances 
sufficient to warrant a review.\9\ Therefore, in accordance with 
section 751(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216(d), the Department is 
initiating a changed circumstances review to determine whether AMM is 
the successor-in-interest to AMLT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See CCR Request at 2.
    \9\ See 19 CFR 351.216(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results

    When it concludes that expedited action is warranted, the 
Department may publish the notice of initiation and preliminary results 
of a CCR in a single notice.\10\ The Department has combined the notice 
of initiation and preliminary results in successor-in-interest cases 
when sufficient documentation has been provided supporting the request 
to make a preliminary determination.\11\ In this instance, because the 
record contains information necessary to support the request for a 
preliminary determination, we find that expedited action is warranted, 
and we are combining the notice of initiation and the notice of 
preliminary results, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii).
    \11\ See, e.g., Initiation and Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Crystalline Silicon 
Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the 
People's Republic of China, 81 FR 76561 (November 3, 2016), 
unchanged in Solar Cells PRC 2016 CCR Final.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In a CCR, we generally consider a company to be the successor to 
another company for antidumping (AD) cash deposit purposes if the 
operations of the successor are not materially dissimilar from those of 
its predecessor.\12\ In making this determination, the Department 
examines a number of factors including, but not limited to, changes in: 
(1) Management; (2) production facilities; (3) suppliers; and (4) 
customer base.\13\ While no one or several of these factors will 
necessarily provide a dispositive indication of succession, the 
Department will generally consider one company to be the successor to 
another company if its resulting operation is essentially the same as 
that of its predecessor.\14\ Thus, if the evidence demonstrates that, 
with respect to the production and sale of the subject merchandise, the 
new company operates as the same business entity as the prior company, 
the Department will assign the new company the cash deposit rate of its 
predecessor.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Id.
    \13\ See Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Changed Circumstances Review: Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 
People's Republic of China, 79 FR 48117, 48118 (August 15, 2014), 
unchanged in Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic 
of China: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review, 79 FR 58740 
(September 30, 2014).
    \14\ Id.
    \15\ See Solar Cells PRC 2016 CCR Final, 81 FR at 91910.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its CCR Request, AMM provided evidence demonstrating that its 
operations are not materially dissimilar from those of its predecessor, 
AMLT.\16\ Specifically, AMM and AMLT are both owned by the same parent 
company, and the record shows that the same employees and management 
control the company both before and after the acquisition.\17\ Further, 
AMM demonstrates that it simply integrated AMLT's long steel products 
production facilities into its company's assets and has not made any 
material changes to the production processes.\18\ Finally, the record 
confirms that there have not been any material changes to the company's 
suppliers,\19\ nor to the customer base,\20\ as a result of the merger. 
Based on the foregoing findings, which are explained in greater detail 
in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, the Department preliminarily 
determines that AMM is the successor-in-interest to AMLT and, as such, 
it is entitled to AMLT's AD cash deposit rate with respect to entries 
of subject merchandise. Should our final results remain the same as 
these preliminary results, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection to suspend liquidation of entries of wire rod products 
produced and/or exported by AMM at the AD cash-deposit rate applicable 
to AMLT, effective the date of publication of the final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See generally CCR Request.
    \17\ Id. at 4-5 and Exhibits B and C.
    \18\ Id. at 6-7 and Exhibit A.
    \19\ Id. at 7-8 and Exhibit A.
    \20\ Id. at 8-9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Public Comment

    Interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days 
after the date of publication of this notice.\21\ Rebuttal briefs, 
which must be limited to issues raised in such briefs, may be filed not 
later than seven days after the date of publication of this notice.\22\ 
Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this changed 
circumstances review are requested to submit with each argument: (1) A 
statement of the issue; and (2) a brief summary of the argument with an 
electronic version included.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See 19 CFR 321.309(c)(1)(ii).
    \22\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2).
    \23\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of 
publication of this notice.\24\ Hearing requests should contain the 
following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone 
number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to 
be discussed. Oral presentations at the hearing will be limited to 
issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, 
parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be 
held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230 in a room to be determined.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
    \25\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    All submissions, with limited exceptions, must be filed 
electronically using Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). An 
electronically filed document must be received successfully in its 
entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on the due date. Documents 
excepted from the electronic submission requirements must be filed 
manually (i.e., in paper form) with the APO/Dockets Unit in Room 18022 
and stamped with the date and time of receipt by 5 p.m. ET on the due 
date.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Electronic Filing Procedures: Administrative Protective Order 
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Unless extended, consistent with 19 CFR 351.216(e), we intend to 
issue the final results of this changed-circumstances review no later 
than 270 days after the date on which this review was initiated or 
within 45 days if all parties agree to the outcome of the review. We 
intend to issue and publish this initiation and preliminary results 
notice in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act 
and 19 CFR 351.216 and 351.221(c)(3) of the Department's regulations.

    Dated: September 28, 2017.
Carole Showers,
Executive Director, Office of Policy performing the duties of the 
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-21341 Filed 10-3-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

46222 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 4, 2017 / Notices of intent to participate. The required review (CCR) of the antidumping duty expedited changed circumstances contents of the notice of intent to order on carbon and certain alloy steel review.5 participate are set forth at 19 CFR wire rod (wire rod) from Mexico to Scope of the Order 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with the determine whether ArcelorMittal Department’s regulations, if we do not Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (AMM) is the The merchandise covered by the receive a notice of intent to participate successor-in-interest to ArcelorMittal Order is carbon and certain alloy steel from at least one domestic interested Las Truchas, S.A. de C.V. (AMLT). wire rod. The product is currently party by the 15-day deadline, the Based on the information on the record, classified under the Harmonized Tariff Department will automatically revoke we preliminarily determine that AMM Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) the order without further review.6 is the successor-in-interest to AMLT. item numbers 7213.91.3000, If we receive an order-specific notice Interested parties are invited to 7213.91.3010, 7213.91.3011, of intent to participate from a domestic comment on these preliminary results. 7213.91.3015, 7213.91.3020, interested party, the Department’s 7213.91.3090, 7213.91.3091, regulations provide that all parties DATES: Applicable October 4, 2017. 7213.91.3092, 7213.91.3093, wishing to participate in a Sunset 7213.91.4500, 7213.91.4510, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Review must file complete substantive 7213.91.4590, 7213.91.6000, Keith Haynes, AD/CVD Operations, responses not later than 30 days after 7213.91.6010, 7213.91.6090, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, the date of publication in the Federal 7213.99.0030, 7213.99.0031, International Trade Administration, Register of this notice of initiation. The 7213.99.0038, 7213.99.0090, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 required contents of a substantive 7227.20.0000, 7227.20.0010, Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, response, on an order-specific basis, are 7227.20.0020, 7227.20.0030, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5139. set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note 7227.20.0080, 7227.20.0090, that certain information requirements SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 7227.20.0095, 7227.90.6010, differ for respondent and domestic 7227.90.6020, 7227.90.6030, Background 7227.90.6035, 7227.90.6050, parties. Also, note that the Department’s information requirements are distinct On October 29, 2002, the Department 7227.90.6051, 7227.90.6053, from the Commission’s information published in the Federal Register the 7227.90.6058, 7227.90.6059, requirements. Consult the Department’s antidumping duty order on wire rod 7227.90.6080, and 7227.90.6085 of the regulations for information regarding from Mexico.1 On May 19, 2016, the HTSUS. Although the HTSUS numbers the Department’s conduct of Sunset Department published its final results of are provided for convenience and Reviews. Consult the Department’s the 2013–2014 administrative review of customs purposes, the written product regulations at 19 CFR part 351 for the Order, in which it assigned AMLT description remains dispositive.6 definitions of terms and for other a 2.59 percent dumping margin.2 On Initiation of Changed Circumstances general information concerning August 15, 2017, AMM, a foreign Review antidumping and countervailing duty producer of the subject merchandise, Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the proceedings at the Department. requested that the Department initiate Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), This notice of initiation is being and conduct a changed circumstance and the Department’s regulations (19 published in accordance with section review to determine that AMM is the CFR 351.216 and 351.221(c)(3)), the 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). successor-in-interest to AMLT for the Department will conduct a changed Dated: September 28, 2017. purposes of the Order.3 On September circumstances review upon receipt of James Maeder, 12, 2017, AMM filed a letter stating it information concerning, or a request conferred with counsel for interested Senior Director, perfoming the duties of from an interested party for a review of, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping parties to this proceeding, specifically, an order which shows changed and Countervailing Duty Operations. counsel for Nucor Corporation, counsel circumstances sufficient to warrant a for Gerdau Ameristeel USA, Charter [FR Doc. 2017–21340 Filed 10–3–17; 8:45 am] review of the order. Generally, in the Steel, and Keystone Steel, and counsel BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P past, the Department has used CCRs to for Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. and Deacero address the applicability of cash deposit USA (a group which included domestic rates after there have been changes in DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE interested parties/petitioners to the the name or structure of a respondent, Order), at which time they stated they such as a merger or spinoff (i.e., International Trade Administration would not oppose the August 15, 2017, successor-in-interest, or successorship request.4 AMM further requested that [A–201–830] determinations).7 the Department initiate and conduct an Initiation and Preliminary Results of 5 Id. 1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Carbon 6 For a complete description of the scope of the Changed Circumstances Review: and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, order, see Memorandum from James Maeder, Senior Antidumping Duty Order on Carbon Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, Director performing the duties of Deputy Assistant and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From and Ukraine, 67 FR 65945 (October 29, 2002) Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Mexico (Order). Operations, to Carole Showers, Executive Director, 2 See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod Office of Policy, performing the duties of the AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and International Trade Administration, Administrative Review, 81 FR 31592 (May 19, Compliance, ‘‘Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES 2016). Rod from Mexico Preliminary Decision Department of Commerce. 3 See letter from AMM, ‘‘Carbon and Certain Memorandum of Changed Circumstances Review,’’ SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico: Request for dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, (Department) is simultaneously Changed Circumstances Review,’’ dated August 15, these preliminary results (Preliminary Decision 2017 (CCR Request). Memorandum). initiating and issuing the preliminary 4 See letter from AMM, ‘‘Carbon and Certain 7 See, e.g., Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, results of a changed circumstances Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico: Supplement to Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the Request for Changed Circumstances Review,’’ dated People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 6 See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). September 12, 2017 (CCR Supplement). Changed Circumstances Review, 81 FR 91909 VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Oct 03, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM 04OCN1

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 4, 2017 / Notices 46223 Specifically, AMM states that as of several of these factors will necessarily date of publication of this notice.22 May 2, 2017, AMLT, which received its provide a dispositive indication of Parties who submit case briefs or own cash deposit rate as a mandatory succession, the Department will rebuttal briefs in this changed respondent in the most recently generally consider one company to be circumstances review are requested to completed administrative review of the the successor to another company if its submit with each argument: (1) A Order, entered into a purchase and sale resulting operation is essentially the statement of the issue; and (2) a brief agreement (Agreement) with AMM, same as that of its predecessor.14 Thus, summary of the argument with an under which nearly all AMLT’s assets if the evidence demonstrates that, with electronic version included.23 and commercial relationships were sold respect to the production and sale of the Any interested party may request a to AMM.8 Thus, consistent with subject merchandise, the new company hearing within 30 days of publication of Department practice, we find the operates as the same business entity as this notice.24 Hearing requests should information submitted by AMM the prior company, the Department will contain the following information: (1) demonstrates changed circumstances assign the new company the cash The party’s name, address, and sufficient to warrant a review.9 deposit rate of its predecessor.15 telephone number; (2) the number of Therefore, in accordance with section In its CCR Request, AMM provided participants; and (3) a list of the issues 751(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR evidence demonstrating that its to be discussed. Oral presentations at 351.216(d), the Department is initiating operations are not materially dissimilar the hearing will be limited to issues a changed circumstances review to from those of its predecessor, AMLT.16 raised in the briefs. If a request for a determine whether AMM is the Specifically, AMM and AMLT are both hearing is made, parties will be notified successor-in-interest to AMLT. owned by the same parent company, of the time and date for the hearing to Preliminary Results and the record shows that the same be held at the U.S. Department of When it concludes that expedited employees and management control the Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue action is warranted, the Department company both before and after the NW., Washington, DC 20230 in a room may publish the notice of initiation and acquisition.17 Further, AMM to be determined.25 preliminary results of a CCR in a single demonstrates that it simply integrated All submissions, with limited notice.10 The Department has combined AMLT’s long steel products production exceptions, must be filed electronically the notice of initiation and preliminary facilities into its company’s assets and using Enforcement and Compliance’s results in successor-in-interest cases has not made any material changes to Antidumping and Countervailing Duty when sufficient documentation has been the production processes.18 Finally, the Centralized Electronic Service System provided supporting the request to make record confirms that there have not been (ACCESS). An electronically filed a preliminary determination.11 In this any material changes to the company’s document must be received successfully instance, because the record contains suppliers,19 nor to the customer base,20 in its entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time information necessary to support the as a result of the merger. Based on the (ET) on the due date. Documents request for a preliminary determination, foregoing findings, which are explained excepted from the electronic submission we find that expedited action is in greater detail in the Preliminary requirements must be filed manually warranted, and we are combining the Decision Memorandum, the Department (i.e., in paper form) with the APO/ notice of initiation and the notice of preliminarily determines that AMM is Dockets Unit in Room 18022 and preliminary results, in accordance with the successor-in-interest to AMLT and, stamped with the date and time of 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii). as such, it is entitled to AMLT’s AD receipt by 5 p.m. ET on the due date.26 In a CCR, we generally consider a cash deposit rate with respect to entries Unless extended, consistent with 19 company to be the successor to another of subject merchandise. Should our final CFR 351.216(e), we intend to issue the company for antidumping (AD) cash results remain the same as these final results of this changed- deposit purposes if the operations of the preliminary results, we will instruct circumstances review no later than 270 successor are not materially dissimilar U.S. Customs and Border Protection to days after the date on which this review from those of its predecessor.12 In suspend liquidation of entries of wire was initiated or within 45 days if all making this determination, the rod products produced and/or exported parties agree to the outcome of the Department examines a number of by AMM at the AD cash-deposit rate review. We intend to issue and publish factors including, but not limited to, applicable to AMLT, effective the date this initiation and preliminary results changes in: (1) Management; (2) of publication of the final results. notice in accordance with sections production facilities; (3) suppliers; and Public Comment 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 (4) customer base.13 While no one or CFR 351.216 and 351.221(c)(3) of the Interested parties may submit case Department’s regulations. (December 19, 2016) (Solar Cells PRC 2016 CCR briefs not later than 30 days after the Final). date of publication of this notice.21 Dated: September 28, 2017. 8 See CCR Request at 2. Rebuttal briefs, which must be limited Carole Showers, 9 See 19 CFR 351.216(d). to issues raised in such briefs, may be Executive Director, Office of Policy 10 See 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii). filed not later than seven days after the performing the duties of the Deputy Assistant 11 See, e.g., Initiation and Preliminary Results of Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or [FR Doc. 2017–21341 Filed 10–3–17; 8:45 am] of Changed Circumstances Review, 79 FR 58740 Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People’s (September 30, 2014). BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Republic of China, 81 FR 76561 (November 3, sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES 14 Id. 2016), unchanged in Solar Cells PRC 2016 CCR 15 See Solar Cells PRC 2016 CCR Final, 81 FR at 22 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2). Final. 12 Id. 91910. 23 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 16 See generally CCR Request. 13 See Initiation and Preliminary Results of 24 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 17 Id. at 4–5 and Exhibits B and C. 25 See 19 CFR 351.310(d). Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: 18 Id. at 6–7 and Exhibit A. Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People’s 26 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 19 Id. at 7–8 and Exhibit A. Republic of China, 79 FR 48117, 48118 (August 15, Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures: 20 Id. at 8–9. 2014), unchanged in Multilayered Wood Flooring Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results 21 See 19 CFR 321.309(c)(1)(ii). 39263 (July 6, 2011). VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:18 Oct 03, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM 04OCN1


Document Created: 2018-10-25 09:54:59
Document Modified: 2018-10-25 09:54:59
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesApplicable October 4, 2017.
ContactKeith Haynes, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5139.
FR Citation82 FR 46222 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR