82 FR 46382 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 192 (October 5, 2017)
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 192 (October 5, 2017)
| Page Range | 46382-46385 | |
| FR Document | 2017-19041 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 46382-46385] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-19041] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2016-9183; Product Identifier 2016-NM-059-AD; Amendment 39-19029; AD 2017-18-20] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for The Boeing Company Model 707 airplanes equipped with a main cargo door (MCD). This AD was prompted by analysis of the cam support assemblies of the MCD that indicated the repetitive high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections required by the existing maintenance program are not adequate to detect cracks before two adjacent cam support assemblies of the MCD could fail. This AD requires repetitive ultrasonic inspections for cracking of the cam support assemblies of the MCD, and replacement if necessary. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. DATES: This AD is effective November 9, 2017. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of November 9, 2017. ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600; telephone 562-797-1717; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425- 227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016- 9183. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016- 9183; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chandra Ramdoss, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5239; fax: 562-627- 5210; email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all The Boeing Company Model 707 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on October 4, 2016 (81 FR 68376) (``the NPRM''). The NPRM was prompted by analysis of the cam support assemblies of the MCD that indicated the repetitive HFEC inspections required by the existing maintenance program are not adequate to detect cracks before two adjacent cam support assemblies of the MCD could fail. The NPRM proposed to require repetitive ultrasonic inspections for cracking of the cam support assemblies of the MCD, and replacement if necessary. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking of the cam support assemblies of the MCD. Such cracking could result in reduced structural integrity of the MCD and consequent rapid decompression of the airplane. Comments We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment. Request To Revise Applicability Boeing stated that Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3542, dated February 12, 2016, affects only Boeing factory and Boeing-converted freighters, but the proposed AD extends the applicability to all Model 707 airplanes, including the ones that have been converted by non- Boeing supplemental type certificates (STCs). We infer the commenter is requesting that the actions of the service information only be required for Model 707 airplanes identified in the Effectivity paragraph of Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3542, dated February 12, 2016. We agree that the applicability of the proposed AD should not include Model 707 airplanes that do not have an MCD. However, we disagree that the AD applicability should be limited to the airplanes identified in the Effectivity paragraph of Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3542, dated February 12, 2016, which only identifies Boeing factory and Boeing-converted freighters. The cam support assemblies having the affected part number could be installed at original aircraft manufacture, or during passenger-to-freighter modification. We expect that the actions specified in Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3542, dated February 12, 2016, can be accomplished on airplanes that are not identified in that service information. However, if an operator with a Model 707 freighter that is not a part of Boeing type design cannot accomplish the required actions in the service information, or prefers to use different service information that is specific to their design, approval of an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) can be requested in accordance with paragraph (j) of this AD. We revised this AD to limit the applicability to Model 707 airplanes equipped with an MCD. Request To Supersede AD 80-08-10 R1, Amendment 39-3830 (45 FR 46343, July 10, 1980) (``AD 80-08-10 R1'') Boeing requested that we revise the NPRM to supersede AD 80-08-10 R1. Boeing stated that AD 80-08-10 R1 mandates HFEC inspections of MCD cam support assemblies having part numbers (P/Ns) 69-23588-1 and 69- 23588-2, as specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 707-A3387. Boeing explained that the NPRM is adding cam support assemblies having P/Ns 69-23588-1 and 69-23588-2 to the list in Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3542, dated February 12, 2016. Boeing asserted that the addition of these components to the list of affected parts would mean that the operators have to perform HFEC inspections of cam support assemblies having P/Ns 69-23588-1 and 69-23588-2, as specified in AD 80-08-10 R1, and perform ultrasonic inspections of the same components, as specified in the proposed AD. Boeing explained that [[Page 46383]] cracking initiates at the bottom of the lubrication hole on the inside of the cam support fitting lug and is not visible until it breaks to the surface of the lug. The subsurface detection capability of the ultrasonic inspection provides a more reliable inspection. We partially agree with Boeing's request to supersede the inspections which are still required per AD 80-08-10 Rl. These inspections will overlap with the newly mandated repetitive inspections. We disagree with the request to revise this AD to supersede AD 80-08-10 Rl. Instead, we have added language to paragraph (i) of this AD to state that accomplishing the initial inspection and all applicable replacements required by paragraph (h) of this AD on an airplane terminates the requirements of AD 80-08-10 R1, for that airplane only. Request To Revise Compliance Time Boeing requested that we revise the compliance time in paragraph (g)(l) of the proposed AD from ``before the accumulation of 18,000 total flight cycles'' to ``before the accumulation of 18,000 door flight cycles, or within 10 years after the utilization of MCD cam support assemblies, whichever occurs first. If the door flight cycles are not known, use total airplane flight cycles.'' Boeing explained that this change would provide relief for the operators that use converted freighters by delaying the required inspection for the MCDs that have been in service less than 18,000 total door flight cycles, but are installed on the airplanes that have more than 18,000 total airframe flight cycles. Boeing also stated that the 10-year time limit is included in Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3542, dated February 12, 2016, to address the low utilization rate of Model 707/720 airplanes. We agree with Boeing's request. For the airplanes that have been converted to freighters, the compliance time for the initial inspection should be based on the number of cycles the MCD cam support assembly has been in service. We have revised paragraph (g)(l) of this AD accordingly. In addition, we have revised paragraph (h) of this AD to refer to the compliance times specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD instead of referring to Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3542, dated February 12, 2016. We have also removed the exception to the service information that was in paragraph (i) of the proposed AD. Conclusion We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this final rule with the changes described previously and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM. We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final rule. Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 We reviewed Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3542, dated February 12, 2016. The service information describes procedures for an ultrasonic inspection of the cam support assemblies of the MCD for cracking, and replacement if necessary. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this AD will affect 12 airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD: Estimated Costs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cost on U.S. Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inspection...................... 6 work-hours x $85 $0 $510 per inspection $22,950 per per hour = $510 cycle. inspection cycle. per inspection cycle. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements that would be required based on the results of the inspection. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need this replacement: On-Condition Costs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cost per Action Labor cost Parts cost product ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Replacement.................................. 60 work-hours x $85 per hour = $14,107 $19,207 $5,100. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes to the Director of the System Oversight Division. Regulatory Findings This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a [[Page 46384]] substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): 2017-18-20 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-19029; Docket No. FAA- 2016-9183; Product Identifier 2016-NM-059-AD. (a) Effective Date This AD is effective November 9, 2017. (b) Affected ADs This AD affects AD 80-08-10 R1, Amendment 39-3830 (45 FR 46343, July 10, 1980). (c) Applicability This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 707-100 Long Body, - 200, -100B Long Body, and -100B Short Body series airplanes; and Model 707-300, -300B, -300C, and -400 series airplanes; certificated in any category; equipped with a main cargo door (MCD). (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 52, Doors. (e) Unsafe Condition This AD was prompted by analysis of the cam support assemblies of the MCD that indicated the repetitive high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections required by the existing maintenance program are not adequate to detect cracks before two adjacent cam support assemblies of the MCD could fail. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking of the cam support assemblies of the MCD. Such cracking could result in reduced structural integrity of the MCD and consequent rapid decompression of the airplane. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) Inspection to Determine Part Numbers At the later of the times specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD: Inspect the cam support assemblies of the MCD to determine whether part number (P/N) 69-23588-1, 69-23588-2, 69- 23588-5, 69-23588-6, 69-23588-9, or 69-23588-10 is installed. A review of airplane maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the part number(s) of the cam support assemblies of the MCD can be conclusively determined from that review. (1) Before the accumulation of 18,000 total flight cycles since installation of the door, or before the accumulation of 10 years on the MCD cam support assemblies, whichever occurs first. If the number of flight cycles since installation of the door are not known, use total airplane flight cycles. (2) Within 1,790 flight cycles or 24 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later. (h) Repetitive Inspections of the Cam Support Assemblies of the MCD and Corrective Actions If, during any inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD, any cam support assembly of the MCD having P/N 69-23588-1, 69-23588- 2, 69-23588-5, 69-23588-6, 69-23588-9, or 69-23588-10 is determined to be installed: At the later of the times specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, do an ultrasonic inspection to detect cracking of the affected cam support assemblies of the MCD, and do all applicable replacements, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3542, dated February 12, 2016. Do all applicable replacements before further flight. Repeat the inspections thereafter at the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3542, dated February 12, 2016. (i) Terminating Action for AD 80-08-10 R1, Amendment 39-3830 (45 FR 46343, July 10, 1980) Accomplishment of the initial inspection and all applicable replacements on an airplane, as required by paragraph (h) of this AD, terminates all the requirements of AD 80-08-10 R1, Amendment 39- 3830 (45 FR 46343, July 10, 1980), for that airplane only. (j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (k) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected]. (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be approved, the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD. (4) For service information that contains steps that are labeled as Required for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs (j)(4)(i) and (j)(4)(ii) of this AD apply. (i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and identified figures. (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. (k) Related Information For more information about this AD, contact Chandra Ramdoss, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627- 5239; fax: 562-627-5210; email: [email protected]. (l) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. (i) Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin A3542, dated February 12, 2016. (ii) Reserved. (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740- 5600; [[Page 46385]] telephone 562-797-1717; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 31, 2017. Dionne Palermo, Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2017-19041 Filed 10-4-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
![46382 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on Examining the AD Docket proposed AD extends the applicability
September 22, 2017. to all Model 707 airplanes, including
You may examine the AD docket on
Robert J. Ganley, the ones that have been converted by
the Internet at http://
Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards www.regulations.gov by searching for non-Boeing supplemental type
Branch, Aircraft Certification Service.
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016– certificates (STCs).
[FR Doc. 2017–21285 Filed 10–4–17; 8:45 am] 9183; or in person at the Docket We infer the commenter is requesting
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Management Facility between 9 a.m. that the actions of the service
information only be required for Model
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
707 airplanes identified in the
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Effectivity paragraph of Boeing 707
contains this final rule, the regulatory
Alert Service Bulletin A3542, dated
Federal Aviation Administration evaluation, any comments received, and
February 12, 2016. We agree that the
other information. The address for the
applicability of the proposed AD should
14 CFR Part 39 Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
not include Model 707 airplanes that do
Docket Management Facility, U.S.
not have an MCD. However, we disagree
Department of Transportation, Docket
[Docket No. FAA–2016–9183; Product that the AD applicability should be
Identifier 2016–NM–059–AD; Amendment Operations, M–30, West Building
limited to the airplanes identified in the
39–19029; AD 2017–18–20] Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 Effectivity paragraph of Boeing 707
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, Alert Service Bulletin A3542, dated
RIN 2120–AA64 DC 20590. February 12, 2016, which only identifies
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Boeing factory and Boeing-converted
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Chandra Ramdoss, Aerospace Engineer, freighters. The cam support assemblies
Company Airplanes Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles having the affected part number could
AGENCY: Federal Aviation ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount be installed at original aircraft
Administration (FAA), DOT. Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712–4137; manufacture, or during passenger-to-
phone: 562–627–5239; fax: 562–627– freighter modification. We expect that
ACTION: Final rule. 5210; email: chandraduth.ramdoss@ the actions specified in Boeing 707 Alert
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new faa.gov. Service Bulletin A3542, dated February
airworthiness directive (AD) for The SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 12, 2016, can be accomplished on
Boeing Company Model 707 airplanes airplanes that are not identified in that
Discussion service information. However, if an
equipped with a main cargo door
(MCD). This AD was prompted by We issued a notice of proposed operator with a Model 707 freighter that
analysis of the cam support assemblies rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR is not a part of Boeing type design
of the MCD that indicated the repetitive part 39 by adding an AD that would cannot accomplish the required actions
high frequency eddy current (HFEC) apply to all The Boeing Company Model in the service information, or prefers to
inspections required by the existing 707 airplanes. The NPRM published in use different service information that is
maintenance program are not adequate the Federal Register on October 4, 2016 specific to their design, approval of an
to detect cracks before two adjacent cam (81 FR 68376) (‘‘the NPRM’’). The alternative method of compliance
support assemblies of the MCD could NPRM was prompted by analysis of the (AMOC) can be requested in accordance
fail. This AD requires repetitive cam support assemblies of the MCD that with paragraph (j) of this AD. We
ultrasonic inspections for cracking of indicated the repetitive HFEC revised this AD to limit the applicability
the cam support assemblies of the MCD, inspections required by the existing to Model 707 airplanes equipped with
and replacement if necessary. We are maintenance program are not adequate an MCD.
issuing this AD to address the unsafe to detect cracks before two adjacent cam Request To Supersede AD 80–08–10 R1,
condition on these products. support assemblies of the MCD could Amendment 39–3830 (45 FR 46343, July
DATES: This AD is effective November 9,
fail. The NPRM proposed to require 10, 1980) (‘‘AD 80–08–10 R1’’)
2017. repetitive ultrasonic inspections for
cracking of the cam support assemblies Boeing requested that we revise the
The Director of the Federal Register NPRM to supersede AD 80–08–10 R1.
approved the incorporation by reference of the MCD, and replacement if
necessary. We are issuing this AD to Boeing stated that AD 80–08–10 R1
of a certain publication listed in this AD mandates HFEC inspections of MCD
as of November 9, 2017. detect and correct cracking of the cam
support assemblies of the MCD. Such cam support assemblies having part
ADDRESSES: For service information cracking could result in reduced numbers (P/Ns) 69–23588–1 and 69–
identified in this final rule, contact structural integrity of the MCD and 23588–2, as specified in Boeing Service
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, consequent rapid decompression of the Bulletin 707–A3387. Boeing explained
Attention: Contractual & Data Services airplane. that the NPRM is adding cam support
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC assemblies having P/Ns 69–23588–1 and
110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600; Comments 69–23588–2 to the list in Boeing 707
telephone 562–797–1717; Internet We gave the public the opportunity to Alert Service Bulletin A3542, dated
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You participate in developing this final rule. February 12, 2016. Boeing asserted that
may view this service information at the The following presents the comments the addition of these components to the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 received on the NPRM and the FAA’s list of affected parts would mean that
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For the operators have to perform HFEC
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
response to each comment.
information on the availability of this inspections of cam support assemblies
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. Request To Revise Applicability having P/Ns 69–23588–1 and 69–
It is also available on the Internet at Boeing stated that Boeing 707 Alert 23588–2, as specified in AD 80–08–10
http://www.regulations.gov by searching Service Bulletin A3542, dated February R1, and perform ultrasonic inspections
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2016– 12, 2016, affects only Boeing factory and of the same components, as specified in
9183. Boeing-converted freighters, but the the proposed AD. Boeing explained that
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:56 Oct 04, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM 05OCR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_46574/page/1.svg)
![46384 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
substantial direct effect on the States, on indicated the repetitive high frequency eddy for this AD, if requested using the procedures
the relationship between the national current (HFEC) inspections required by the found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
government and the States, or on the existing maintenance program are not 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
adequate to detect cracks before two adjacent principal inspector or local Flight Standards
distribution of power and
cam support assemblies of the MCD could District Office, as appropriate. If sending
responsibilities among the various fail. We are issuing this AD to detect and information directly to the manager of the
levels of government. correct cracking of the cam support certification office, send it to the attention of
For the reasons discussed above, I assemblies of the MCD. Such cracking could the person identified in paragraph (k) of this
certify that this AD: result in reduced structural integrity of the AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory MCD and consequent rapid decompression of LAACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
action’’ under Executive Order 12866, the airplane. (2) Before using any approved AMOC,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under (f) Compliance
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
Comply with this AD within the of the local flight standards district office/
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), compliance times specified, unless already
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation certificate holding district office.
done. (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
in Alaska, and
(g) Inspection to Determine Part Numbers level of safety may be used for any repair,
(4) Will not have a significant
modification, or alteration required by this
economic impact, positive or negative, At the later of the times specified in AD if it is approved by the Boeing
on a substantial number of small entities paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD: Commercial Airplanes Organization
under the criteria of the Regulatory Inspect the cam support assemblies of the Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
Flexibility Act. MCD to determine whether part number (P/ been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles
N) 69–23588–1, 69–23588–2, 69–23588–5, ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 69–23588–6, 69–23588–9, or 69–23588–10 is approved, the repair method, modification
installed. A review of airplane maintenance
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation records is acceptable in lieu of this
deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
safety, Incorporation by reference, the certification basis of the airplane, and the
inspection if the part number(s) of the cam
Safety. approval must specifically refer to this AD.
support assemblies of the MCD can be
(4) For service information that contains
conclusively determined from that review.
Adoption of the Amendment steps that are labeled as Required for
(1) Before the accumulation of 18,000 total
Compliance (RC), the provisions of
Accordingly, under the authority flight cycles since installation of the door, or
paragraphs (j)(4)(i) and (j)(4)(ii) of this AD
delegated to me by the Administrator, before the accumulation of 10 years on the
apply.
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as MCD cam support assemblies, whichever
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
follows: occurs first. If the number of flight cycles
since installation of the door are not known, substeps under an RC step and any figures
use total airplane flight cycles. identified in an RC step, must be done to
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS comply with the AD. If a step or substep is
(2) Within 1,790 flight cycles or 24 months
DIRECTIVES after the effective date of this AD, whichever labeled ‘‘RC Exempt,’’ then the RC
occurs later. requirement is removed from that step or
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 substep. An AMOC is required for any
continues to read as follows: (h) Repetitive Inspections of the Cam deviations to RC steps, including substeps
Support Assemblies of the MCD and and identified figures.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Corrective Actions (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
§ 39.13 [Amended] If, during any inspection required by deviated from using accepted methods in
paragraph (g) of this AD, any cam support accordance with the operator’s maintenance
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding or inspection program without obtaining
assembly of the MCD having P/N 69–23588–
the following new airworthiness 1, 69–23588–2, 69–23588–5, 69–23588–6, approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
directive (AD): 69–23588–9, or 69–23588–10 is determined including substeps and identified figures, can
2017–18–20 The Boeing Company: to be installed: At the later of the times still be done as specified, and the airplane
Amendment 39–19029; Docket No. specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of can be put back in an airworthy condition.
FAA–2016–9183; Product Identifier this AD, do an ultrasonic inspection to detect (k) Related Information
2016–NM–059–AD. cracking of the affected cam support
assemblies of the MCD, and do all applicable For more information about this AD,
(a) Effective Date replacements, in accordance with the contact Chandra Ramdoss, Aerospace
This AD is effective November 9, 2017. Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 707 Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los
Alert Service Bulletin A3542, dated February Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount
(b) Affected ADs 12, 2016. Do all applicable replacements Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712–4137;
This AD affects AD 80–08–10 R1, before further flight. Repeat the inspections phone: 562–627–5239; fax: 562–627–5210;
Amendment 39–3830 (45 FR 46343, July 10, thereafter at the applicable time specified in email: chandraduth.ramdoss@faa.gov.
1980). paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing 707 (l) Material Incorporated by Reference
Alert Service Bulletin A3542, dated February
(c) Applicability 12, 2016. (1) The Director of the Federal Register
This AD applies to The Boeing Company approved the incorporation by reference
Model 707–100 Long Body, –200, –100B (i) Terminating Action for AD 80–08–10 R1, (IBR) of the service information listed in this
Long Body, and –100B Short Body series Amendment 39–3830 (45 FR 46343, July 10, paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
airplanes; and Model 707–300, –300B, 1980) part 51.
–300C, and –400 series airplanes; certificated Accomplishment of the initial inspection (2) You must use this service information
in any category; equipped with a main cargo and all applicable replacements on an as applicable to do the actions required by
door (MCD). airplane, as required by paragraph (h) of this this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
AD, terminates all the requirements of AD (i) Boeing 707 Alert Service Bulletin
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
(d) Subject 80–08–10 R1, Amendment 39–3830 (45 FR A3542, dated February 12, 2016.
Air Transport Association (ATA) of 46343, July 10, 1980), for that airplane only. (ii) Reserved.
America Code 52, Doors. (3) For service information identified in
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
(e) Unsafe Condition (AMOCs) Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
This AD was prompted by analysis of the (1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
cam support assemblies of the MCD that FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:56 Oct 04, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM 05OCR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_46574/page/3.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 46385
telephone 562–797–1717; Internet https:// ADDRESSES: Availability of matters regulatory text of the SIAPs, Takeoff
www.myboeingfleet.com. incorporated by reference in the Minimums or ODPs, but instead refer to
(4) You may view this service information amendment is as follows: their graphic depiction on charts
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, printed by publishers of aeronautical
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For For Examination
information on the availability of this
materials. Thus, the advantages of
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 1. U.S. Department of Transportation, incorporation by reference are realized
(5) You may view this service information Docket Ops–M30, 1200 New Jersey and publication of the complete
that is incorporated by reference at the Avenue SE., West Bldg., Ground Floor, description of each SIAP, Takeoff
National Archives and Records Washington, DC 20590–0001. Minimums and ODP listed on FAA form
Administration (NARA). For information on 2. The FAA Air Traffic Organization documents is unnecessary. This
the availability of this material at NARA, call Service Area in which the affected amendment provides the affected CFR
202–741–6030, or go to: http:// airport is located; sections and specifies the types of
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr- 3. The office of Aeronautical SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs
locations.html. Navigation Products, 6500 South with their applicable effective dates.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK This amendment also identifies the
31, 2017. 73169 or, airport and its location, the procedure,
Dionne Palermo, 4. The National Archives and Records and the amendment number.
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Administration (NARA). For Availability and Summary of Material
Aircraft Certification Service. information on the availability of this Incorporated by Reference
[FR Doc. 2017–19041 Filed 10–4–17; 8:45 am] material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P or go to: http://www.archives.gov/ The material incorporated by
federal_register/code_of_federal_ reference is publicly available as listed
regulations/ibr_locations.html. in the ADDRESSES section.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION The material incorporated by
Availability reference describes SIAPS, Takeoff
Federal Aviation Administration All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and Minimums and/or ODPS as identified in
ODPs are available online free of charge. the amendatory language for part 97 of
14 CFR Part 97 Visit the National Flight Data Center at this final rule.
nfdc.faa.gov to register. Additionally, The Rule
[Docket No. 31154; Amdt. No. 3765] individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums
and ODP copies may be obtained from This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is
Standard Instrument Approach the FAA Air Traffic Organization effective upon publication of each
Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums Service Area in which the affected separate SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and
and Obstacle Departure Procedures; airport is located. ODP as Amended in the transmittal.
Miscellaneous Amendments Some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: textual ODP amendments may have
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Thomas J. Nichols, Flight Procedure been issued previously by the FAA in a
Administration (FAA), DOT. Standards Branch (AFS–420), Flight Flight Data Center (FDC) Notice to
ACTION: Final rule. Technologies and Programs Divisions, Airmen (NOTAM) as an emergency
Flight Standards Service, Federal action of immediate flight safety relating
SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, Aviation Administration, Mike directly to published aeronautical
suspends, or removes Standard Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 charts.
Instrument Approach Procedures South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, The circumstances that created the
(SIAPs) and associated Takeoff OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box need for some SIAP and Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle Departure 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125) Minimums and ODP amendments may
Procedures (ODPs) for operations at Telephone: (405) 954–4164. require making them effective in less
certain airports. These regulatory SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: than 30 days. For the remaining SIAPs
actions are needed because of the This rule amends Title 14 of the Code and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, an
adoption of new or revised criteria, or of Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR effective date at least 30 days after
because of changes occurring in the part 97), by establishing, amending, publication is provided.
National Airspace System, such as the suspending, or removes SIAPS, Takeoff Further, the SIAPs and Takeoff
commissioning of new navigational Minimums and/or ODPS. The complete Minimums and ODPs contained in this
facilities, adding new obstacles, or regulatory description of each SIAP and amendment are based on the criteria
changing air traffic requirements. These its associated Takeoff Minimums or contained in the U.S. Standard for
changes are designed to provide safe ODP for an identified airport is listed on Terminal Instrument Procedures
and efficient use of the navigable FAA form documents which are (TERPS). In developing these SIAPs and
airspace and to promote safe flight incorporated by reference in this Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the
operations under instrument flight rules amendment under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1 TERPS criteria were applied to the
at the affected airports. CFR part 51, and 14 CFR part 97.20. The conditions existing or anticipated at the
DATES: This rule is effective October 5, applicable FAA forms are FAA Forms affected airports. Because of the close
2017. The compliance date for each 8260–3, 8260–4, 8260–5, 8260–15A, and and immediate relationship between
SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, 8260–15B when required by an entry on these SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and
8260–15A. ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
and ODP is specified in the amendatory
provisions. The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff that notice and public procedure under
The incorporation by reference of Minimums and ODPs, their complex 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are impracticable and
certain publications listed in the nature, and the need for a special format contrary to the public interest and,
regulations is approved by the Director make publication in the Federal where applicable, under 5 U.S.C 553(d),
of the Federal Register as of October 5, Register expensive and impractical. good cause exists for making some
2017. Further, airmen do not use the SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:56 Oct 04, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM 05OCR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_46574/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2017-10-05 00:53:31
Document Modified: 2017-10-05 00:53:31
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This AD is effective November 9, 2017. | |
| Contact | Chandra Ramdoss, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5239; fax: 562-627- 5210; email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 46382 | |
| RIN Number | 2120-AA64 | |
| CFR Associated | Air Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR