82 FR 46388 - Mortality Tables for Determining Present Value Under Defined Benefit Pension Plans
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 192 (October 5, 2017)
Internal Revenue Service
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 192 (October 5, 2017)
| Page Range | 46388-46411 | |
| FR Document | 2017-21485 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 46388-46411] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-21485] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 1 [TD9826] RIN 1545-BM71 Mortality Tables for Determining Present Value Under Defined Benefit Pension Plans AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Final regulations. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations prescribing mortality tables to be used by most defined benefit pension plans. The tables specify the probability of survival year-by-year for an individual based on age, gender, and other factors. This information is used (together with other actuarial assumptions) to calculate the present value of a stream of expected future benefit payments for purposes of determining the minimum funding requirements for a defined benefit plan. These mortality tables are also relevant in determining the minimum required amount of a lump-sum distribution from such a plan. In addition, this document contains final regulations updating the requirements that a plan sponsor must meet to obtain IRS approval to use mortality tables specific to the plan for minimum funding purposes (instead of using the generally applicable mortality tables). These regulations affect participants in, beneficiaries of, employers maintaining, and administrators of certain retirement plans. DATES: Effective date: These regulations are effective on October 5, 2017. Applicability date: These regulations apply to plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the regulations, Arslan Malik at (202) 317-6700; concerning the construction of the base mortality tables and the static mortality tables for 2018, Michael Spaid at (206) 946-3480. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background A. Generally Applicable Mortality Tables Section 412 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) prescribes minimum funding requirements for defined benefit pension plans. Section 430 specifies the minimum funding requirements that apply generally to defined benefit plans that are not multiemployer plans.\1\ Section 430(a) defines the minimum required contribution for a plan year by reference to the plan's funding target for the plan year. Under section 430(d)(1), a plan's funding target for a plan year generally is the present value of all benefits accrued or earned under the plan as of the first day of that plan year. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Section 302 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, Public Law 93-406, as amended (ERISA), sets forth funding rules that are parallel to those in section 412 of the Code, and section 303 of ERISA sets forth additional funding rules for defined benefit plans (other than multiemployer plans) that are parallel to those in section 430 of the Code. Under section 101 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978 (43 FR 47713) and section 302 of ERISA, the Secretary of the Treasury has interpretive jurisdiction over the subject matter addressed in these regulations for purposes of ERISA, as well as the Code. Thus, these Treasury regulations issued under section 430 of the Code also apply for purposes of section 303 of ERISA. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 430(h)(3) contains rules regarding the mortality tables to be used under section 430. Under section 430(h)(3)(A), except as provided in section 430(h)(3)(C) or (D), the Secretary is to prescribe by regulation mortality tables to be used in determining any present value or making any computation under section 430. Those mortality tables must be based on the actual mortality experience of pension plan participants and projected trends in that experience. In prescribing those mortality tables, the Secretary is required to take into account results of available independent studies of mortality of individuals covered by pension plans.\2\ Under section [[Page 46389]] 430(h)(3)(B), the Secretary is required to make revisions to any table in effect under section 430(h)(3)(A) at least every 10 years to reflect actual mortality experience of pension plan participants and projected trends in that experience. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ The standards prescribed for developing these mortality tables are the same as the standards that are prescribed for developing mortality tables for multiemployer plans under section 431(c)(6)(D)(iv)(II) (which are used to determine current liability as part of the calculation of the minimum full funding limitation under section 431(c)(6)(B)). These standards also apply for purposes of determining current liability as part of the calculation of the minimum full funding limitation under section 433(c)(7)(C) for a CSEC plan (as defined in section 414(y)). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 430(h)(3)(C) prescribes rules for a plan sponsor's use of substitute mortality tables reflecting the specific mortality experience of a plan's population instead of using the generally applicable mortality tables. Under section 430(h)(3)(C), the plan sponsor may request the Secretary's approval to use plan-specific substitute mortality tables that meet requirements specified in the statute. Section 430(h)(3)(D) provides for the use of separate mortality tables with respect to certain individuals who are entitled to benefits on account of disability. These separate mortality tables are permitted to be used with respect to disabled individuals in lieu of the generally applicable mortality tables provided pursuant to section 430(h)(3)(A) or the substitute mortality tables under section 430(h)(3)(C). The Secretary is to establish separate tables for individuals with disabilities occurring in plan years beginning before January 1, 1995, and in later plan years, with the mortality tables for individuals with disabilities occurring in those later plan years applying only to individuals who are disabled within the meaning of Title II of the Social Security Act. Final regulations (TD 9419) under section 430(h)(3) were published in the Federal Register for July 31, 2008 (73 FR 44632). The final regulations issued in 2008 include rules regarding generally applicable mortality tables, which are set forth in Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1 (the 2008 general mortality table regulations), as well as rules regarding substitute mortality tables, which are set forth in Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-2 (the 2008 substitute mortality table regulations). The 2008 general mortality table regulations prescribe a base mortality table and a set of mortality improvement rates that are used to project mortality rates for years after the year 2000. The mortality tables included in those regulations are based on the mortality tables included in the RP-2000 Mortality Tables Report (based on an experience study for the period 1990-1994 and referred to in this preamble as the RP-2000 mortality tables) released by the Society of Actuaries in July 2000 (updated in May 2001). The mortality improvement rates included in those regulations are the Scale AA Projection Factors (which are based on mortality improvement for the period 1977 through 1993), which were included in the RP-2000 Mortality Tables Report for use in conjunction with the RP-2000 mortality tables.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ The RP-2000 Mortality Tables Report is available at https://www.soa.org/experience-studies/2000-2004/research-rp-2000-mortality-tables/. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The 2008 general mortality table regulations prescribe the use of generational mortality tables,\4\ but include an option for plans to use static mortality tables. The static mortality tables (which are updated annually) use a single mortality table for all years of birth to approximate the present value that would be determined using the generational mortality tables. The 2008 general mortality table regulations set forth static mortality tables for valuation dates occurring in 2008 and provide that static mortality tables for valuation dates occurring in later years will be published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. Static mortality tables for valuation dates occurring during 2009-2013 were published in Notice 2008-85 (2008-1 C.B. 747 (March 28, 2008)). Updated static mortality tables for valuation dates occurring during 2014 and 2015 were published in Notice 2013-49 (2013-32 I.R.B. 127 (July 10, 2013)). Updated static mortality tables for valuation dates occurring in 2016 and 2017 were published in Notice 2015-53 (2015-33 I.R.B. 190 (July 31, 2015)) and Notice 2016-50 (2016-38 I.R.B. 371 (September 2, 2016)), respectively. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ Generational mortality tables are a series of mortality tables, one for each year of birth, each of which fully reflects projected trends in mortality for individuals who are born in a particular year. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notice 2013-49 also requested comments on whether a separate disability mortality table is still warranted with respect to participants who became disabled before 1995. In addition, Notice 2013- 49 noted that the Treasury Department (Treasury) and the IRS were aware that the Society of Actuaries was conducting a mortality study of pension plan participants and specifically requested comments on whether other studies of actual mortality experience of pension plan participants and projected trends of that experience were available that should be considered for use in developing mortality tables for future use under section 430(h)(3). In October 2014, the Retirement Plans Experience Committee (RPEC) of the Society of Actuaries issued a new mortality study of participants in private pension plans. The study, which is based on mortality experience for the years 2004 to 2008, is referred to as the RP-2014 Mortality Tables Report (and sets forth mortality tables that are referred to as the RP-2014 mortality tables). The RP-2014 Mortality Tables Report, as revised November 2014, is available at www.soa.org/Research/Experience-Study/pension/research-2014-rp.aspx. At the same time, RPEC issued a companion study of mortality improvement, referred to as the Mortality Improvement Scale MP-2014 Report (which sets forth mortality improvement rates that are referred to as the Scale MP-2014 rates). As described in the Mortality Improvement Scale MP-2014 Report (available at www.soa.org/Research/Experience-Study/pension/research-2014-mp.aspx), the Scale MP-2014 rates were based on mortality improvement experience for the general population through 2009. In October 2015, RPEC released an update to the Scale MP-2014 rates. The updated rates, referred to as the Scale MP-2015 rates, were released as part of the Mortality Improvement Scale MP-2015 Report (available at https://www.soa.org/Research/Experience-Study/Pension/research-2015-mp.aspx). The Scale MP-2015 rates were created using historical data for mortality improvement for the general population through 2011 and the same model and parameters that were used to produce the Scale MP-2014 rates. In conjunction with the release of the updated rates, RPEC indicated the intent to reflect the latest data available by providing future annual updates to the model as soon as practicable following the public release of updated data upon which the model is constructed. In October 2016, RPEC released a further update to the Scale MP- 2014 rates, which are referred to as the Scale MP-2016 rates. The Scale MP-2016 rates take into account data for mortality improvement for the general population for 2012 and 2013, along with an estimate of mortality rates for 2014. As described in the Mortality Improvement Scale MP-2016 Report (available at www.soa.org/Research/Experience-Study/Pension/research-2016-mp.aspx), in developing the Scale MP-2016 rates, RPEC changed some of the parameters from those that were used in developing the Scale MP-2014 rates. B. Plan-Specific Substitute Mortality Tables Section 430(h)(3)(C) permits a plan sponsor to request approval by the Secretary to use plan-specific substitute mortality tables in lieu of the generally applicable mortality tables. If the Secretary determines that the proposed [[Page 46390]] tables meet the statutory standards and approves the request, the substitute mortality tables are used to determine present values and make computations under section 430 during the period of consecutive plan years (not to exceed 10) specified in the request. Under the statute, a substitute mortality table may be used for a plan, only if: (1) The plan has a sufficient number of plan participants and has been maintained for a sufficient period of time to have credible mortality information necessary to create a substitute mortality table; and (2) the table reflects the actual mortality experience of the plan's participants and projected trends in general mortality experience. Except as provided by the Secretary, a plan sponsor may not use substitute mortality tables for any plan unless substitute mortality tables are established and used for each plan maintained by the plan sponsor or a member of its controlled group. The 2008 substitute mortality table regulations provide for review by the Commissioner of a plan sponsor's request for approval to use substitute mortality tables. Under those regulations, to use substitute mortality tables with respect to a plan, a plan sponsor must submit a written request to the Commissioner that demonstrates that those substitute mortality tables comply with applicable requirements. A request for approval to use substitute mortality tables must specify the first plan year and the term of years for which the tables are requested to be used. Substitute mortality tables may not be used for a plan year unless the plan sponsor submits the request at least 7 months before the first day of the first plan year for which the substitute mortality tables are to apply. The Commissioner has 180 days to review a request for approval to use substitute mortality tables. If the Commissioner does not deny the request within this 180-day period, the request is deemed to have been approved unless the Commissioner and the plan sponsor have agreed to extend that period. Under the 2008 substitute mortality table regulations, substitute mortality tables for a plan must be established separately for each gender, and a substitute mortality table may be established for a gender only if there is credible mortality experience with respect to that gender. If the mortality experience for one gender is credible but the mortality experience for the other gender is not credible, the substitute mortality tables are used for the gender that has credible mortality experience, and the generally applicable mortality tables are used for the gender that does not have credible mortality experience. Under the 2008 substitute mortality table regulations, there is credible mortality experience with respect to a gender if and only if, over the period covered by the experience study, there are at least 1,000 deaths of individuals of that gender.\5\ For this purpose, the minimum length of the experience study period is 2 years and the maximum length of the experience study period generally is 5 years. Furthermore, the last day of the final year reflected in the experience data must be less than three years before the first day of the first plan year for which the substitute mortality tables are to apply. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ The 1,000-death threshold for credible mortality experience under the regulations was intended to provide a high degree of confidence that the plan's past mortality experience will be predictive of its future mortality, and is consistent with relevant actuarial literature (see, for example, Thomas N. Herzog, Introduction to Credibility Theory (1999); Stuart A. Klugman, et. al., Loss Models: From Data to Decisions (2004)). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Under the 2008 substitute mortality table regulations, development of substitute mortality tables for a plan requires creation of a base table and identification of a base year, which are then used to determine the substitute mortality tables. The base table must be developed from a study of the mortality experience of the plan using amounts-weighted data. Under those regulations, a plan's substitute mortality tables must be generational mortality tables that are determined using the base mortality tables developed from the experience study and the Scale AA Projection Factors (that is, using the same basis for mortality improvement that is used under 2008 general mortality table regulations). Under the 2008 substitute mortality table regulations, the use of substitute mortality tables is terminated early in certain circumstances, including pursuant to a replacement of the generally applicable mortality tables. The early termination pursuant to such a replacement must be effective as of a date specified in guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. Rev. Proc. 2008-62 (2008-2 C.B. I.R.B. 935) sets forth the procedure by which a plan sponsor of a defined benefit plan may request and obtain approval to use plan-specific substitute mortality tables in accordance with section 430(h)(3)(C). The revenue procedure specifies the information that must be provided in a request for approval to use substitute mortality tables and specifies two alternative acceptable methods of construction for base substitute mortality tables. Under section 11 of Rev. Proc. 2008-62, a base table for a population may be created from the unadjusted base table for the population through the application of a graduation method generally used by the actuarial profession in the United States.\6\ Section 12 of Rev. Proc. 2008-62 provides for an alternative method of constructing a base table through the application of a fixed percentage to the mortality rates of a standard mortality table, projected to the base year. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ The revenue procedure identifies the Whittaker-Henderson Type B graduation method or the Karup-King graduation method as acceptable methods. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 503 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, Public Law 114-74 (129 Stat. 584 (2015)), which was enacted November 2, 2015, provides for changes to the rules on the use of substitute mortality tables. Under that section, ``the determination of whether plans have credible information shall be made in accordance with established actuarial credibility theory, which (1) is materially different from the rules under [section 430(h)(3)(C)], including Revenue Procedure 2007-37,\7\ that are in effect on [November 2, 2015]; and (2) permits the use of tables that reflect adjustments to the tables described in [section 430(h)(3)(A) and (B)]'' if those adjustments are based on the actual experience of the pension plan maintained by the plan sponsor. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ Rev. Proc. 2007-37, 2007-1 CB 1433, was not in effect on November 2, 2015. It was issued in 2007 in conjunction with proposed regulations regarding substitute mortality tables (REG-143601-06, 72 FR 29456) and was replaced by Rev. Proc. 2008-62 when those regulations were finalized in 2008. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed regulations regarding revisions to mortality tables under section 430(h)(3) (REG-112324-15) were published in the Federal Register on December 29, 2016 (81 FR 95911). The proposed regulations contain revisions to the generally applicable mortality tables (based on the RP-2014 Mortality Tables Report), as well as new rules regarding substitute mortality tables that reflect section 503 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. Comments were received on the proposed regulations, and a public hearing was held on April 13, 2017. After consideration of the comments, the proposed regulations are adopted by this Treasury decision subject to certain changes, the most significant of which are described in this preamble under the heading Explanation of Provisions. Explanation of Provisions I. Overview These final regulations revise the methodology for developing the [[Page 46391]] generally applicable mortality tables that are used to determine present value or make any computation under section 430. Pursuant to section 417(e)(3)(B), a modified version of these tables will be used for purposes of determining the amount of a single-sum distribution (or another accelerated form of distribution). This revised methodology for developing tables under section 430(h)(3)(A) is being issued pursuant to the requirement under section 430(h)(3)(B) to revise the mortality tables used under section 430 at least every 10 years to reflect the actual mortality experience of pension plan participants and projected trends in that experience. As under the 2008 general mortality table regulations, the methodology involves the separate determination of base tables and the projection of mortality improvement. These regulations also revise the rules regarding substitute mortality tables. This revision is being made pursuant to section 503 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, which requires that the determination of whether a plan has credible information be made in accordance with established actuarial credibility theory. Following enactment of that requirement, Treasury and the IRS undertook a review of actuarial literature regarding credibility theory and consulted with experts on that topic from the Society of Actuaries. Based on that review and analysis, these regulations set forth a method for developing substitute mortality tables that is materially different from the method that is required under the 2008 substitute mortality table regulations and the associated revenue procedure. The method for developing substitute mortality tables that is set forth in the final regulations is simpler than the graduation method that applies under the 2008 substitute mortality table regulations and also accommodates the use of substitute mortality tables for plans with smaller populations that have only partially credible mortality experience. II. Generally Applicable Mortality Tables A. Base Mortality Tables Under these regulations, the generally applicable base mortality tables are derived from the tables contained in the RP-2014 Mortality Tables Report. In response to Notice 2013-49, commenters generally recommended that the RP-2014 mortality tables form the basis for the mortality tables used under section 430. After reviewing the RP-2014 mortality tables, the accompanying report published by the Society of Actuaries, and related public comments, Treasury and the IRS determined that the experience study used to develop the RP-2014 mortality tables is the best available study of the actual mortality experience of pension plan participants (other than disabled individuals). As a result, Treasury and the IRS issued proposed regulations that use the RP-2014 mortality tables as the foundation for the base mortality tables used to project the mortality rates of pension plan participants (other than disabled individuals).\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ Mortality tables that may be used as an alternative to the tables provided in these regulations with respect to certain disabled individuals are provided in Rev. Rul. 96-7 (1996-1 CB 59). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Most commenters supported the selection of the base mortality tables in the proposed regulations. One commenter opposed this selection but did not suggest any alternative. Accordingly, the base mortality tables under these final regulations are the same as in the proposed regulations. Like the mortality tables provided in the 2008 general mortality table regulations, the mortality tables under these final regulations are gender-distinct because of significant differences between expected male mortality and expected female mortality. In addition, as under the 2008 general mortality table regulations, these regulations set forth separate mortality rates for annuitants and nonannuitants. The base tables that are set forth in these final regulations are used to develop the mortality tables for future years. These base tables have a base year of 2006 (the central year of the experience study used to develop the mortality tables in the RP-2014 Mortality Tables Report). These base tables generally have the same mortality rates as the RP-2014 mortality tables after factoring out the mortality improvements from 2007 to 2014 (calculated using the Scale MP-2014 rates). However, these base tables also include nonannuitant mortality rates for ages below age 18 and above age 80 and annuitant mortality rates for ages below age 50. This generally is the same approach that was used to develop the base tables included in the 2008 general mortality table regulations. B. Mortality Improvement and Static Mortality Tables The proposed regulations, like the 2008 general mortality table regulations, provided that expected trends in mortality experience must be taken into account through the use of either generational or annually updated static mortality tables. In accordance with section 430(h)(3)(B), the proposed regulations updated the mortality improvement rates used under the 2008 general mortality table regulations. To select up-to-date mortality improvement rates, Treasury and the IRS reviewed the Mortality Improvement Scale MP-2014 Report, related public comments, the data sources cited in those comments, the Mortality Improvement Scale MP-2015 Report, the Mortality Improvement Scale MP-2016 Report, and other published data sources.\9\ After that review, Treasury and the IRS issued proposed regulations that applied the MP-2016 rates to develop mortality tables for use in 2018. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See the August 2013 Literature Review and Assessment of Mortality Improvement Rates in the U.S. Population: Past Experience and Future Long-Term Trends, available at www.soa.org/Files/Research/Exp-Study/research-2013-lit-review.pdf. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Some commenters supported the selection of the mortality improvement rates in the proposed regulations, while other commenters expressed concerns about the selection of those rates. Those commenters who expressed concern about the mortality improvement rates noted that the selection of a long-term mortality improvement rate assumption is inherently speculative and cautioned against using the assumptions regarding the rate of long-term mortality improvement that were used by RPEC (which are a long-term rate of 1.0 percent per year for ages 85 and younger, grading down to 0.85 percent at age 95, and further grading down to 0 at age 115). Instead of the RPEC assumptions, these commenters suggested that Treasury and the IRS use assumptions regarding the rate of long-term mortality improvement that are closer to the rates that are used by the Office of the Actuary within the Social Security Administration. Those rates also vary by age group, and the documentation accompanying the 2017 report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal Old-Age, Survivors Insurance and Disability Insurance Trust Funds indicates that, under the intermediate assumptions (which reflect the Trustees' best estimates of future experience), the weighted average over all ages of those assumed long-term mortality improvement rates is 0.72 percent per year.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See ``The Long-Range Demographic Assumptions for the 2017 Trustees Report,'' Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security Administration (July 13, 2017), at Mortality, page 17 (available at https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TR/2017/2017_Long-Range_Demographic_Assumptions.pdf). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Treasury and the IRS carefully considered the assumptions used by Office of the Actuary within the Social Security Administration and compared it with the long-term assumptions [[Page 46392]] currently recommended by RPEC. In evaluating the merits of each, Treasury and the IRS took into consideration the views of the Technical Panel of the Social Security Advisory Board. The Social Security Advisory Board is an independent federal government agency, and the Technical Panel, which is comprised of actuaries, economists and demographers, is charged by the Advisory Board with reviewing the assumptions and methods used in the annual report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal Old-Age, Survivors Insurance and Disability Insurance Trust Funds. The Technical Panel, which issues a report every 4 years, has consistently recommended that the mortality improvement assumption used by the Office of the Actuary be increased.\11\ In addition, the Congressional Budget Office uses a faster rate of mortality improvement in evaluating Social Security solvency than the Office of the Actuary.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See ``2015 Technical Panel on Assumptions and Methods Report to the Social Security Advisory Board,'' available at www.ssab.gov/Details-Page/ArticleID/656/2015-Technical-Panel-on-Assumptions-and-Methods-A-Report-to-the-Board-September-2015. \12\ See Comparing CBO's Long-Term Projections with Those of the Social Security Trustees: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Social Security, Committee on Ways and Means, U.S. House of Representatives, 114th Cong. September 21, 2016 (Testimony of Keith Hall), available at https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/114th-congress-2015-2016/reports/51988-socialsecuritytestimony.pdf. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- After review and consideration of the comments, the documentation accompanying the Trustees' Report, and the views of the Technical Panel of the Social Security Advisory Board, Treasury and the IRS have concluded that the procedures that RPEC used to develop the Scale MP- 2016 rates generate mortality improvement rates that currently are the appropriate rates for use in developing mortality tables to be used for purposes of pension funding. Accordingly, these regulations provide that the mortality improvement rates for valuation dates in 2018 are the Scale MP-2016 rates. Treasury and the IRS understand that RPEC expects to issue updated mortality improvement rates that reflect new data for mortality improvement trends for the general population on an annual basis. As noted by the commenters, while the rate of mortality improvement has fluctuated significantly on a year-to-year basis, there has been a significant reduction in the rate of improvement over the past few years compared to the rate of improvement for the past 25 years. RPEC has indicated the intent to continually review the methodology used in its mortality improvement model in an effort to improve the overall effectiveness of the model, especially with respect to year-over-year stability and forecast accuracy, and it has identified the assumed long-term rate of mortality improvement and graduation techniques as two of the items included in this review. In establishing the mortality improvement rates to be used under section 430(h)(3) for valuation dates in years after 2018, Treasury and the IRS will continue to take into account RPEC's updates (including any modifications to RPEC's methodology), as well as other sources of data or analyses regarding mortality improvement. These regulations provide that the mortality improvement rates applicable for those future valuation dates will be specified in guidance to be published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. See Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter. If Treasury and the IRS determine that significant revisions to the mortality improvement rates are appropriate, the revisions may first be proposed in a new rulemaking in order to allow for public comment before the rule is finalized. Some commenters asked that Treasury and the IRS commit to providing the mortality improvement rates for a calendar year at least 12 months before the start of that year. Treasury and the IRS understand that a significant motivation for this request is to avoid the issuance of new mortality improvement rates in the early part of a calendar year (because issuance of new mortality improvement rates at that time could result in the need to revise calculations that have already been made in the course of preparing a plan sponsor's financial statement as of the previous December 31). While Treasury and the IRS intend that the mortality improvement rates for a calendar year generally will be issued more than 12 months in advance of that year, the final regulations do not include a provision requiring that the mortality improvement rates for a calendar year be issued within this timeframe. Retaining the flexibility to issue mortality improvement rates closer to the date they would become effective will allow additional time for the possibility that certain revisions to the mortality improvement rates will first be published in proposed form. Other commenters requested that Treasury and the IRS consider updating the mortality tables on a less frequent basis than annually. Although the RPEC indicated its intent to issue updated mortality improvement rates on an annual basis, the final regulations do not require the mortality improvement rates under section 430(h)(3) to be updated annually. However, to minimize the discontinuities in mortality rates that could arise from infrequent updates, Treasury and the IRS contemplate that generally the rates will be updated annually. If the changes from one year to the next are minimal, Treasury and the IRS may choose not to update the rates for that year. As under the 2008 general mortality table regulations, the proposed regulations take into account the limitations of some current actuarial software that is not designed to use generational mortality tables and continue to permit the use of static mortality tables. These static mortality tables, when used to determine the present value of an annuity, approximate the present value that would be determined using the generational mortality tables. All but one commenter supported the option to use static mortality tables, and these final regulations provide for this option. These static tables consist of separate gender-specific tables, which are updated annually. The static mortality tables that will be used for 2018 are included in these regulations. For later years, updated static mortality tables will be set forth in guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. See Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter. C. Use of Section 430 Mortality Tables for Other Provisions Section 417(e)(3) generally provides that the present value of certain benefits under a qualified pension plan (including single-sum distributions) must not be less than the present value of the accrued benefit using applicable interest rates and the applicable mortality table. Section 417(e)(3)(B) defines the term ``applicable mortality table'' as the mortality table specified for the plan year for minimum funding purposes under section 430(h)(3)(A) (without regard to the rules for substitute mortality tables under section 430(h)(3)(C) or mortality tables for disabled individuals under section 430(h)(3)(D)), modified as appropriate by the Secretary. The modifications to the section 430(h)(3)(A) mortality table used to determine the section 417(e)(3)(B) applicable mortality table are not addressed in these regulations and are currently provided in Revenue Ruling 2007-67 (2007- 2 C.B. 1047). As under the proposed regulations, the final regulations provide that the same mortality assumptions that apply for purposes of section 430(h)(3)(A) and Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1(a)(2) are used to determine a plan's current liability for purposes of applying the full-funding [[Page 46393]] rules of section 431(c)(6) (in the case of a multiemployer plan) and section 433(c)(7)(C) (in the case of a CSEC plan). For this purpose, a multiemployer plan or CSEC plan is permitted to apply either the annually-adjusted static mortality tables or the generational mortality tables. D. Effective Date The proposed regulations provide that the regulations will be effective beginning in 2018. Some commenters expressed concern that this effective date would not allow adequate time for compliance. One commenter requested that the effective date of the regulations be no sooner than 18 months after the regulations are finalized in order to give plan sponsors adequate time to plan for the higher level of contributions that will be required under the new mortality assumptions. Treasury and the IRS understand that most employers have been planning for the issuance of updated mortality tables for the purposes of section 430 since the RP-2014 Mortality Tables Report was issued in 2014 and many of those employers are already using updated mortality tables for financial reporting purposes. Furthermore, any additional required contributions for a plan resulting from the adoption of the new tables will not be due before September 15, 2019. For a plan with a calendar plan year, this date is 8\1/2\ months after the end of the first plan year for which the regulations apply.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ However, new mortality tables may affect plan operations relating to the requirements of section 436 during the 2018 plan year. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Moreover, as described in section II.C of this Explanation of Provisions, the amount of a single-sum distribution computed as the present value of an annuity is determined using a mortality table that is based on the generally applicable mortality tables used for minimum funding purposes. Thus, retaining the mortality tables under existing regulations for the 2018 plan year, as requested by some commenters, would result in inappropriately depressing the amount of single-sum distributions payable to affected participants during the 2018 plan year (resulting in a permanent loss of retirement assets for those participants). A 2013 study indicates that approximately 56 percent of retiring participants in a traditional defined benefit plan with an unlimited single-sum option choose that option.\14\ In addition, the Government Accountability Office recently issued a study examining the increase in ``lump-sum window'' offers--typically, limited time offers to participants who are no longer employed by the sponsor but still waiting for their pension benefit to begin in the future, or retirees already receiving their pension annuity payments.\15\ Similarly, Willis Towers Watson reported significant risk transferring activity in recent years through lump sum windows and other means.\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ Sudipto Banerjee, Ph.D., Employee Benefits Research Institute, Issue Brief: Annuity and Lump-Sum Decisions in Defined Benefit Plans: The Role of Plan Rules, January 2013, available at https://www.ebri.org/pdf/briefspdf/EBRI_IB_01-13.No381.LSDs2.pdf. \15\ U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO 15-74, Participants Need Better Information When Offered Lump Sums That Replace Their Lifetime Benefits (January 2015). This report also notes the substantial financial advantages that exist for plan sponsors implementing lump sum windows and attributes the recent increase in lump-sum window offers, in part, to the outdated mortality tables in the current regulations, which result in reduced payments to plan participants. Id. at pp. 16-17. \16\ Brendan McFarland, After a few ups and downs, corporate pension funding levels showed little change in 2016: Late-year rise in interest rates and stock market performance mitigate earlier downturn in funded status, Willis Towers Watson Insider, Vol. 27, No. 2 (February 2017) at p. 3, available at https://www.towerswatson.com/en-US/Insights/Newsletters/Americas/insider. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Because these rules were proposed in December of 2016 to be applicable as final regulations for plan years beginning on and after January 1, 2018, the Treasury Department and the IRS believe that many plan sponsors have had adequate time to set aside funds needed for additional pension contributions for the 2018 plan year. Furthermore, because the steps that plan sponsors will need to take to update their administrative systems in response to these final regulations are not significantly different from the steps they would need to take in response to the annual update of mortality tables that has previously occurred at this time of the year, the Treasury Department and the IRS believe that plan sponsors generally will have sufficient time to make any needed changes to these administrative systems.\17\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See section 4. of the Regulatory Impact Assessment provided under the heading Special Analyses, Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563) in this preamble for a discussion of needed changes in administrative systems. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The final regulations generally retain the effective date that was proposed, and apply to plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2018. In response to comments indicating that this effective date may create certain administrative or financial difficulties, the final regulations provide an option that may be used in certain circumstances for the 2018 plan year to apply the regulations that were formerly in effect. Specifically, for a plan for which substitute mortality tables are not used for the 2018 plan year, mortality tables determined in accordance with regulations previously in effect may be used for purposes of applying the rules of section 430 for a valuation date occurring during 2018 if the plan sponsor (1) concludes that the use of mortality tables determined in accordance with the final regulations for the plan year would be administratively impracticable or would result in an adverse business impact that is greater than de minimis, and (2) informs the actuary of the intent to apply this option. While this option provides significant flexibility to plan sponsors, the use of the option will not affect the mortality table used to determine minimum present value for distributions with annuity starting dates in stability periods that begin during 2018 (which is based on the generally applicable mortality tables under section 430(h)(3)(A) that apply if this option is not used). Therefore, the lump-sum distributions received by participants retiring in 2018 will appropriately reflect their expected longevity. III. Plan-Specific Substitute Mortality Tables A. Application of Established Actuarial Credibility Theory These final regulations contain a comprehensive revision of the rules regarding plan-specific substitute mortality tables for plans that are subject to the rules of section 430.\18\ These regulations carry over many of the rules regarding substitute mortality tables from the 2008 substitute mortality table regulations. However, after analyzing the actuarial literature regarding credibility theory, Treasury and the IRS made a number of changes to the rules relating to the development of substitute mortality tables. Specifically, these final regulations, like the proposed regulations, generally require that a substitute mortality table be constructed by multiplying the mortality rates from a projected version of the generally applicable base mortality table by a mortality ratio (that [[Page 46394]] is, a ratio of the actual deaths for the population to the expected deaths determined using the standard mortality tables for that population). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ There is no provision for defined benefit plans that are not subject to the requirements of section 430 (such as multiemployer plans) to request approval to use of substitute mortality tables. However, the mortality tables under section 430(h)(3) are required to be used for those plans only for very limited purposes (and the mortality tables used for those plans for most purposes, while subject to the requirements of section 431(c)(3) or 433(c)(3), are not tables specified by statute or regulations). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Use of mortality ratios (rather than providing for the graduation of raw mortality rates as under the 2008 substitute mortality table regulations) will make it easier for plan sponsors to develop substitute mortality tables because it eliminates the need to apply a complex graduation technique. It also facilitates efficient IRS review of applications for approval to use substitute mortality tables, which is particularly important in light of the other major change made in the regulations (permitting the use of substitute mortality tables for a plan that has mortality experience that is only partially credible). As a result of the changes made in these regulations, Treasury and the IRS expect that significantly more plan sponsors will request approval to use substitute mortality tables. B. Development of Substitute Mortality Tables for Plans With Full Credibility The substitute mortality table for a population with full credibility must be determined by applying projected mortality improvement to a base substitute mortality table developed using an experience study of the population. Like the proposed regulations, the final regulations use the same general requirements for an experience study as under the 2008 substitute mortality table regulations but reflect certain changes from the proposed regulations in response to comments. Specifically, the experience study generally must cover a period of at least 2 (and no more than 5) consecutive 12-month periods that ends less than 3 years before the first day of the first plan year for which the substitute mortality tables are to apply, and must cover the same period for all populations within a plan.\19\ However the final regulations include an exception that permits the use of an earlier study period if the submission is made more than 1 year (and less than 2 years) before the first day of the first plan year for which the substitute mortality tables are proposed to apply. Under this exception, the last day of the experience study period is permitted to be 3 years or more before the first day of the first plan year for which the substitute mortality tables are proposed to apply, provided that the last day of the experience study period is less than 2 years before the application is submitted. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ As under the 2008 regulations and the proposed regulations, the final regulations provide for permissive aggregation of plans of a plan sponsor for purposes of developing and using substitute mortality tables. The final regulations clarify that if two or more plans with different plan years are aggregated, the experience study may consist of data that is collected over different periods for plans with different plan years, subject to certain conditions. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- A base substitute mortality table generally is determined by multiplying the mortality rates from the corresponding standard mortality table (that is, the generally applicable base mortality table for the population, projected with mortality improvement to the base year for the base substitute mortality table) by the mortality ratio for the population. For this purpose, the mortality improvement rates that apply for the calendar year during which the plan sponsor submits the request for approval to use substitute mortality tables are used to project the generally applicable base mortality table to the base year for the base substitute mortality table.\20\ The mortality ratio is determined as a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of actual deaths during the experience study period (with each death weighted by the benefit amount) and the denominator of which is the number of expected deaths during that period (determined using the standard mortality table) weighted by the benefit amount. An individual's benefit amount (which is used to determine amounts- weighted mortality rates and for other purposes in the construction of base substitute mortality tables) is the individual's accrued benefit expressed in the form of an annual benefit commencing at normal retirement age (or at the current age, if later) if the individual has not commenced benefits, and the individual's annual payment if the individual has commenced benefits. Consistent with section 503 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (and unlike Sec. 1.430(h)(3)- 2(c)(2)(ii)(D) of the 2008 substitute mortality table regulations, which provides that the Commissioner may permit the use of other recognized mortality tables to construct the base substitute mortality table), the regulations provide that the standard mortality table that must be used for this purpose is the generally applicable base mortality table projected with mortality improvement to the base year for the base substitute mortality table. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ If the plan sponsor submits such a request during 2017, then mortality improvement is reflected using the mortality improvement rates that generally apply for use for 2018, which are the Scale MP-2016 rates. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Some commenters pointed out that multiplying mortality ratios for a population by the mortality rates in the applicable standard mortality table could yield inappropriate results at extremely old ages. In response to those comments, the final regulations provide that mortality rates under the base substitute mortality tables must be the same as the mortality rates under the standard mortality table for ages above 109 and that a modified mortality ratio is used for ages from 96 through 109 (to accomplish a gradual transition to the standard mortality table while avoiding inappropriate results). If the mortality ratio for the population is greater than 1.0, the modified mortality ratio for an age within this range is equal to the mortality ratio for the population reduced by 1/15th of the excess of the mortality ratio over 1.0 for each year by which the age exceeds 95. If the mortality ratio for the population is less than 1.0, the modified mortality ratio for an age within this range is equal to the mortality ratio for the population increased by 1/15th of the excess of 1.0 over the mortality ratio for each year by which the age exceeds 95. C. Standards for Full Credibility The proposed regulations revised the standard for full credibility of a population under the 2008 substitute mortality table regulations (which is 1,000 actual deaths for the relevant population during the experience study period) to better reflect established actuarial credibility theory. Under established actuarial credibility theory, the 1,000-death threshold (which is a rounding down of the 1,082 actual deaths that would be needed for a 90% confidence level that the measured rate is within 5% of the underlying mortality rate) should apply to the credibility for a single mortality rate and not an entire mortality table.\21\ Moreover, the 1,000 death threshold did not take into account the well-established actuarial principle that mortality experience within a population will vary predictably based on the amount of the annuity (or life insurance, as applicable). The base tables for the generally applicable mortality tables were constructed on an amounts-weighted basis (under which the individuals with higher benefit amounts have a greater weight in the computation of the mortality rate for a [[Page 46395]] particular age); accordingly, substitute mortality tables should be constructed using the same principle. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \21\ Although the use of a graduation technique under Rev. Proc. 2008-62 enables a plan with fewer than 1,000 deaths at each age to have credible mortality experience that may be used to establish a substitute mortality table, the statutory instruction providing that the determination of whether a plan has credible mortality information be made in accordance with established actuarial credibility theory which is materially different than the rules in effect on November 2, 2015, led to the elimination of that technique. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using established actuarial credibility theory to evaluate whether a population has fully credible mortality experience entails the use of a threshold that takes into account the dispersion of benefits within the population. Accordingly, under the proposed regulations, the number of deaths that are needed for a population within a plan to have fully credible mortality experience is determined as the product of 1,082 and the benefit dispersion factor for the population.\22\ The benefit dispersion factor for a population is equal to the number of expected deaths for the population during the experience study period, multiplied by the sum of the mortality-weighted squares of the benefits, divided by the square of the sum of the mortality-weighted benefits.\23\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \22\ This formula for the number of deaths needed for full credibility is based on the assumption that the distribution of releases from liability due to deaths follows a compound Poisson model. See www.actuaries.ca/members/publications/2002/202037e.pdf. \23\ See Gavin Benjamin, Selecting Mortality Tables: A Credibility Approach, available at www.soa.org/Files/Research/Projects/research-2008-benjamin.pdf. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commenters supported the actuarial soundness of the standard for fully credible mortality information under the proposed regulations, and the final regulations adopt the provisions of the proposed regulations regarding full credibility. At the request of commenters, the regulations include expressions of various formulas in mathematical notation to assist actuaries in making computations under the regulations.\24\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \24\ In the proposed regulations, these formulas were stated as amounts to be computed separately for each age and then summed for the population. The final regulations instead state these formulas more concisely as amounts to be computed for the entire population. These two approaches yield mathematically identical results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- One commenter noted that the increase of the threshold for full credibility (together with the inability to reflect the pattern of the plan's mortality experience at different ages) may produce substitute mortality tables that are substantially different than those that are currently in use. To address this concern, in part, the final regulations include an option to increase the credibility of a plan's mortality experience by basing it on the combined mortality experience of both genders.\25\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \25\ This option is described in section III.F.2 of this Explanation of Provisions (Option to use combined male and female mortality experience). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- D. Partial Credibility As under the proposed regulations, the final regulations permit substitute mortality tables to be used for a plan that does not have sufficient deaths to have fully credible mortality information. In accordance with established actuarial credibility theory, the substitute mortality table used for such a plan is the weighted average of the standard mortality table and the substitute mortality table that would be developed for the plan if it were to have fully credible mortality information. The weight for the substitute mortality table that would be developed for the plan if the plan were to have fully credible mortality information is the square root of a fraction, the numerator of which is the actual number of deaths for the population within the experience study period and the denominator of which is the number of deaths needed for the plan to have fully credible mortality information. E. Controlled Group Consistency Requirement Under section 430(h)(3)(iv) there is a general consistency requirement for the use of substitute mortality tables with respect to all plans within a controlled group. Thus, use of substitute mortality tables for a plan is generally permitted only if substitute mortality tables are used for all plans subject to section 430 that are maintained within the controlled group of the plan sponsor. The 2008 substitute mortality table regulations set forth an exception from this consistency requirement for plans that did not have credible mortality experience. As a result of the change permitting the use of substitute mortality tables for plans that have only partially credible mortality information, Treasury and the IRS concluded that the exception should be modified so that it only applies to plans with a relatively small population. Accordingly, the regulations provide that a population does not have credible mortality information (and so a substitute mortality table is neither permitted nor required to be used for that population) if the actual number of deaths for that population during the experience study period is less than 100. For this purpose, the length of the experience study period must be the same length as the longest experience study period for any plan in the controlled group \26\ and must end less than 3 years before the first day of the first plan year for which the substitute mortality tables are to apply. Treasury and the IRS proposed the use of a threshold of 100 deaths to balance the benefit of the use of substitute mortality tables for a plan with a relatively small population (which would be small, given the relatively low weight assigned to that plan's partially credible mortality experience) against the burden of developing substitute mortality tables for that plan (which would be required to comply with the controlled group consistency requirement). No comments were received objecting to this threshold or recommending a different threshold. As a result, the final regulations adopt the proposed 100- death threshold. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\ If a plan has credible mortality information for one gender but not for the other gender, the length of the period of this demonstration is the length of the experience study for that plan. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- F. Other Rules Relating to the Use of Substitute Mortality Tables 1. Multiple-Employer Plans In response to comments, the final regulations provide rules regarding the use of substitute mortality tables in connection with multiple-employer plans. Under the final regulations, the application for use of substitute mortality tables in the case of a multiple- employer plan must be made by the plan administrator, and the substitute mortality tables must apply on a plan-wide basis (even if the plan is subject to the rules of section 413(c)(4)(A)). In addition, the final regulations provide special rules for the application of the controlled group consistency rule in the case of a multiple-employer plan. Under this special rule, an employer participating in a multiple-employer plan is treated as maintaining that plan if and only if the proportion of the plan's funding target attributable to the employees and former employees of the employer and members of the employer's controlled group is greater than 50 percent. Thus, such an employer is subject to the controlled group consistency rule with respect to the multiple-employer plan and any other plans subject to section 430 maintained by that employer (or any member of that employer's controlled group). By contrast, if the proportion of the multiple-employer plan's funding target attributable to the employees and former employees of the employer and members of the employer's controlled group is less than or equal to 50 percent, then that employer is not subject to the controlled group consistency rule with respect to the multiple-employer plan and any other plans subject to section 430 maintained by that employer (and any member of that employer's controlled group). [[Page 46396]] 2. Option To Use Combined Male and Female Mortality Experience Some commenters requested the ability to develop and use substitute mortality tables based on the combined experience of both males and females in the plan, to increase the credibility of mortality experience for a smaller population. Treasury and the IRS have determined that this approach is consistent with established actuarial credibility theory. Accordingly, the final regulations provide that a single mortality ratio may be developed for both genders and then used to construct separate gender-specific base substitute mortality tables for the plan. If this option is applied for a plan, then substitute mortality tables used for all plans in the plan sponsor's controlled group must be constructed in this manner (except for plans for which both the male and female populations, considered separately, have mortality experience with full credibility). In addition, if this option is applied for a plan, then the mortality experience for both genders must be combined for all other purposes under the regulations, including the determination of: (1) Whether a plan has credible mortality information for purposes of the controlled group consistency requirement; (2) whether the mortality experience for a plan has full credibility; and (3) the partial credibility weighting factor. 3. Special Rules for Newly-Affiliated Plans The proposed regulations provide for a transition period during which the controlled group consistency requirement does not apply with respect to a newly-affiliated plan (that is, a plan that has become maintained within the new controlled group in connection with a transaction described in Sec. 1.410(b)-2(f)). In response to comments, the final regulations extend the transition period during which the controlled group consistency requirement does not apply with respect to a newly-affiliated plan so that it ends on the last day of the plan year that immediately follows the period described in section 410(b)(6)(C)(ii) for any of the plans in the controlled group (whichever ends latest). For example, if all of the plans involved have a plan year that is the calendar year and a corporate transaction occurs during 2017, then the transition period during which the controlled group consistency requirement does not apply ends on December 31, 2019 (the end of the plan year that immediately follows December 31, 2018, which is the end of the period described in section 410(b)(6)(C)(ii)). This longer transition period will ensure that the plan sponsor has adequate time to complete an experience study covering the newly-affiliated plan for use in its submission for approval of substitute mortality tables for a plan year beginning January 1, 2020. As under the proposed regulations, the final regulations provide that this experience study may exclude the pre-affiliation data and the experience study period may be as short as 1 year (instead of 2 years). Therefore, under the facts of this example, the experience study used to develop substitute mortality tables for the plan may cover only calendar year 2018.\27\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \27\ However, if the experience study is used to demonstrate a lack of credible mortality information, the experience study period may be shorter than required under the otherwise applicable rules only if it starts on the date the plan becomes a newly-affiliated plan. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. Early Termination of Use of Substitute Mortality Tables and Transition Rule The final regulations retain the rules from the 2008 substitute mortality table regulations regarding the termination of use of substitute mortality tables before their originally scheduled expiration. Among the circumstances that lead to early termination is the replacement of the generally applicable mortality tables (other than annual updates to the static mortality tables or changes to the mortality improvement rates). In response to comments, the final regulations include a transition rule under which previously approved base substitute mortality tables continue to apply for plan years beginning in 2018 (assuming that plan year is covered by the original approval and that substitute mortality tables are used by all of the plans within the controlled group that have credible mortality experience under the standards in the 2008 substitute mortality table regulations). In addition, previously approved base substitute mortality tables continue to apply to later plan years during the term of their original approval, provided that the plan sponsor satisfies the requirement that substitute mortality tables be used for all plans in the controlled group that have credible mortality information under the standards in these regulations. However, the mortality improvement rates under the final regulations, rather than the Scale AA Projection Factors (which were used under the 2008 substitute mortality table regulations), must be applied to previously approved base substitute mortality tables beginning in 2019. G. Effective Date These regulations regarding substitute mortality tables apply to plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, subject to certain transition relief. In addition to the transition relief for previously approved base mortality tables described in section III.F.4 of the Explanation of Provisions portion of this preamble, the requirement that a plan sponsor apply for approval to use substitute mortality tables at least 7 months before the beginning of the plan year will be treated as satisfied if the plan sponsor's application is submitted on or before February 28, 2018, provided that the plan sponsor agrees to a 90-day extension of the 180-day review period. Statement of Availability of IRS Documents IRS Revenue Rulings, Revenue Procedures, and Notices cited in this document are published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (or Cumulative Bulletin) and are available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402, or by visiting the IRS Web site at www.irs.gov. Special Analyses Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563) It has been determined that these regulations constitute a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563. Accordingly, these rules have been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. The Regulatory Impact Assessment prepared by Treasury for these regulations is provided below. This rule is not subject to the requirements of Executive Order 13771 because this rule results in no more than de minimis costs. 1. Description of Need for the Regulations Section 430 of the Internal Revenue Code specifies the minimum funding requirements that apply generally to defined benefit plans that are not multiemployer plans. Section 430(h)(3) contains rules regarding the mortality tables to be used under section 430. Under section 430(h)(3)(A), the Secretary is to prescribe by regulation mortality tables to be used in determining any present value or making any computation under section 430.\28\ Under section 430(h)(3)(B), the [[Page 46397]] Secretary is required to revise any mortality table in effect under section 430(h)(3)(A) at least every 10 years to reflect actual mortality experience of pension plan participants and projected trends in that experience. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \28\ Those mortality tables must be based on the actual mortality experience of pension plan participants and projected trends in that experience. In prescribing those mortality tables, the Secretary is required to take into account results of available independent studies of mortality of individuals covered by pension plans. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 430(h)(3)(C) prescribes rules for a plan sponsor's use of substitute mortality tables reflecting the specific mortality experience of a plan's population. Section 503 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 requires certain changes in the rules for developing a plan's substitute mortality tables. The existing regulations regarding mortality tables were issued in 2008, for use beginning in 2008. Those tables were based on a study of mortality experience of pension plan participants covering the years 1990-1994 that was published in 2000. Since that time, studies have shown that people are living longer. For example, a study that RPEC published in 2014 indicates that the mortality tables issued under the 2008 general mortality table regulations no longer reflect the actual mortality experience of pension plan participants and projected trends in that experience. In accordance with section 430(h)(3)(B), the Secretary is required to revise the mortality tables in the existing regulations as a result of these changes in the actual mortality experience and projected trends in that experience. In addition, changes in the existing regulations regarding substitute mortality tables are required under the provisions of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. 2. Affected Population The final regulations affect participants in private-sector defined benefit plans and employers sponsoring those plans. 3. Baseline and Summary of Impacts As required by OMB Circular A-4, the following table summarizes the estimated economic impact of the final regulations. The baseline for this estimate is the mortality tables issued under the existing regulations. Because the new tables reflect the fact that participants are living longer, the primary impact of the final regulations is to increase the reported liability for future benefit payments from pension plans; this higher reported liability will result in higher pension contributions. The higher liability will also result in an increase in PBGC premiums, which are a function of a plan's funded status. Because pension contributions and premiums are deductible from firms' incomes, tax revenues will fall. As described in the effective date discussion in section II.D of the Explanation of Provisions portion of this preamble, these regulations include an option for a plan sponsor that is not using plan-specific mortality tables to delay the application of the new tables in certain circumstances. Because it is difficult to predict how many plan sponsors will utilize this option, the following tables provide a range of estimates of the economic impact of these regulations. The first row of numbers in the tables, labeled ``full take-up amount,'' is based on the assumption that all plan sponsors will use the option to delay the application of the new mortality tables; the second row of numbers, labeled ``no take-up amount,'' is based on the assumption that no plan sponsors will use the option to delay application of the new mortality tables. As noted in the effective date discussion in section II.D of the Explanation of Provisions portion of this preamble, the use of this option will not affect the mortality table used to determine minimum present value under section 417(e). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \29\ The present values are discounted to the beginning of 2019. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Year 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Estimated change in tax revenue (in millions of 2017 dollars) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Full take-up amount....................... 0 -123 -499 -914 -1,170 -1,278 -1,216 -1,081 -807 -353 No take-up amount......................... -84 -362 -717 -1,025 -1,241 -1,314 -1,238 -1,042 -604 -228 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Present Value \29\ with full take-up of delay option (3% Discount Rate): -$6,372 million Present Value with no take-up of delay option (3% Discount Rate): -$6,821 million Present Value with full take-up of delay option (7% Discount Rate): -$5,245 million Present Value with no take-up of delay option (7% Discount Rate): -$5,718 million Annualized Estimate with full take-up of delay option (3% Discount Rate): -$747 million Annualized Estimate with no take-up of delay option (3% Discount Rate): -$800 million Annualized Estimate with full take-up of delay option (7% Discount Rate): -$747 million Annualized Estimate with no take-up of delay option (7% Discount Rate): -$814 million -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Estimated change in contributions (in millions of 2017 dollars) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Full take-up amount....................... 0 2,933 4,873 6,071 6,574 6,069 5,322 3,667 750 407 No take-up amount......................... 2,151 3,631 5,418 6,391 6,694 6,194 5.373 1,751 815 797 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Present Value with full take-up of delay option (3% Discount Rate): $32,417 million Present Value with no take-up of delay option (3% Discount Rate): $35,100 million Present Value with full take-up of delay option (7% Discount Rate): $27,784 million Present Value with no take-up of delay option (7% Discount Rate): $30,595 million Annualized Estimate with full take-up of delay option (3% Discount Rate): $3,800 million Annualized Estimate with no take-up of delay option (3% Discount Rate): $4,115 million Annualized Estimate with full take-up of delay option (7% Discount Rate): $3,956 million Annualized Estimate with no take-up of delay option (7% Discount Rate): $4,356 million -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Estimated change in PBGC premiums (in millions of 2017 dollars) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Full take-up amount....................... 0 293 287 187 91 0 0 0 0 81 No take-up amount......................... 293 287 280 183 89 0 0 0 0 80 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Present Value with full take-up of delay option (3% Discount Rate): 869 million Present Value with no take-up of delay option (3% Discount Rate): 1,143 million Present Value with full take-up of delay option (7% Discount Rate): $791 million Present Value with no take-up of delay option (7% Discount Rate): $1,067 million Annualized Estimate with full take-up of delay option (3% Discount Rate): $102 million [[Page 46398]] Annualized Estimate with no take-up of delay option (3% Discount Rate): $134 million Annualized Estimate with full take-up of delay option (7% Discount Rate): $113 million Annualized Estimate with no take-up of delay option (7% Discount Rate): $152 million -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For pension payments that are paid over a retiree's lifetime, the actual liability will depend on how long the retiree actually lives, and the impact of reflecting longer life expectancies in the calculation of present values under these regulations will merely accelerate the time when additional contributions attributable to longer lifetimes will need to be made. For pension payments that are lump-sum settlements in lieu of lifetime payments, the new tables will increase the amount of the lump sum. If the plan has a lump sum-based benefit formula, such as a cash balance plan, there will be no impact on the amount of a lump sum, but the optional annuity may be smaller.\30\ However, it is difficult to quantify the impact of these changes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \30\ The optional annuity may be smaller because, when converting the lump sum in which the participant's benefit is stated under the plan to an stream of annuity payments for the life of the participant (and the life of the participant's spouse if applicable), the lifetime(s) over which the payments must be paid will generally be assumed to be longer if the new tables are used for this purpose rather than the prior tables. To pay a fixed sum over a longer period, the amount of the periodic payments must be reduced. However, a plan is not required to use these tables for this purpose and a recent study indicates that relatively few participants take an annuity distribution from plans with lump sum based benefit formulas See Sudipto Banerjee, Ph.D., Employee Benefits Research Institute, Issue Brief: Annuity and Lump-Sum Decisions in Defined Benefit Plans: The Role of Plan Rules, January 2013, available at https://www.ebri.org/pdf/briefspdf/EBRI_IB_01-13.No381.LSDs2.pdf. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. Cost Associated With the Regulation Substantially all of the amounts involved (decreased tax revenue, increased plan contributions and PBGC premiums) constitute transfer payments, rather than costs. This is because these amounts are monetary payments from one entity to another that do not affect total resources available to society. We believe that the incremental administrative costs to implement this regulation are negligible, because plan sponsors would have to incur the same costs to update their plan administration software to reflect the new mortality tables under these regulations as they would incur in implementing the annual update to the mortality tables that would apply in the absence of these regulations. Moreover, the specific mortality rates used to calculate benefits for individuals normally are not provided to individual plan participants, so there will be no need to distribute information about the new mortality tables. Rather, plan sponsors and administrators provide individual participants who are considering retiring in the near future with individualized estimates of their benefits and that process is not dependent on the specific mortality rates used to determine benefits under the plan. Furthermore, Treasury and the IRS are issuing these regulations at a similar time of year as mortality tables were issued in prior years (and close in time to the issuance of the earliest interest rates that may be used in calculating the amount of a lump sum benefit to be distributed during a plan year beginning in 2018). In other words, these costs are included in the baseline of the analysis, not as new incremental costs associated with this rulemaking. In terms of the use of the mortality tables for purposes of applying the funding requirements of section 430, these regulations (like the current regulations) permit actuaries to use static mortality tables that approximate the present value determined using the generational mortality tables. Even if a plan's actuary chooses to use generational mortality tables (including plan-specific mortality tables) instead of the static mortality tables, actuarial software capable of applying that approach (including generational mortality tables determined using mortality improvement rates that vary by both age and calendar year) should be readily available, as such generational mortality tables determined using varying mortality improvement rates have been used routinely for financial reporting purposes by large employers since the Mortality Improvement Scale MP- 2014 Report was issued in 2014. In addition, these regulations permit any previously approved plan-specific mortality tables to continue to be used for the duration of the original approval period. Accordingly, any additional cost as a result of the issuance of these regulations should be negligible. Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6) It is hereby certified that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule applies to all employers that sponsor defined benefit plans regardless of size. As stated above, this rule implements the statutorily-required updates and any compliance costs related to this rule are small and are consistent with previously issued annual updates. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, the notice of proposed rulemaking preceding these regulations was submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small business. Drafting Information The principal authors of these regulations are Arslan Malik and Linda S.F. Marshall of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities). However, other personnel from Treasury and the IRS participated in the development of these regulations. List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1 Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended as follows: PART 1--INCOME TAXES 0 Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read, in part, as follows: Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * * 0 Par. 2. Section 1.430(h)(3)-1 is revised to read as follows: Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1 Mortality tables used to determine present value. (a) Basis for mortality tables--(1) In general. Pursuant to section 430(h)(3)(A), this section provides generally applicable mortality tables that are used to determine present value for purposes of section 430, and rules regarding the use of those mortality tables. Either the generational mortality tables under paragraph (a)(2) of this section or the static mortality tables under paragraph (a)(3) of this section may be used for a plan. In lieu of using the mortality tables provided under this section, plan-specific substitute mortality tables may be used pursuant to section 430(h)(3)(C), provided that the requirements of Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-2 are satisfied. Mortality tables that may be used with respect to disabled [[Page 46399]] individuals are provided in guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. See Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter. (2) Generational mortality tables--(i) In general--(A) Use of generational mortality tables. The generational mortality tables that are permitted to be used under section 430(h)(3)(A) and paragraph (a)(1) of this section are determined using the base mortality tables described in paragraph (a)(2)(i)(B) of this section and the mortality improvement rates described in paragraph (a)(2)(i)(C) of this section. (B) Base mortality tables. The base mortality tables are set forth in paragraph (d) of this section. The base year for those tables is 2006. (C) Mortality improvement rates. The mortality improvement rates for valuation dates occurring during 2018 are the mortality improvement rates contained in the Mortality Improvement Scale MP-2016 Report (issued by the Retirement Plans Experience Committee (RPEC) of the Society of Actuaries and available at www.soa.org/Research/Experience-Study/Pension/research-2016-mp.aspx). For later years, updated mortality improvement rates that take into account new data for mortality improvement trends of the general population will be provided in guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. See Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter. (D) Application of mortality improvement rates. Under the generational mortality tables described in this paragraph (a)(2), the probability of an individual's death at a particular age in the future is determined as the individual's base mortality rate that applies at that age (that is, the applicable mortality rate from the table set forth in paragraph (d) of this section for that age, gender, and status as an annuitant or a nonannuitant) multiplied by the cumulative mortality improvement factor for the individual's gender and for that age for the period from 2006 through the calendar year in which the individual is projected to reach the particular age. Paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section shows how the base mortality tables in paragraph (d) of this section and the mortality improvement rates for valuation dates occurring during 2018 are combined to determine projected mortality rates. (E) Cumulative mortality improvement factor. The cumulative mortality improvement factor for an age and gender for a period is the product of the annual mortality improvement factors for that age and gender for each year within that period. (F) Annual mortality improvement factor. The annual mortality improvement factor for an age and gender for a year is 1 minus the mortality improvement rate that applies for that age and gender for that year. (ii) Example of calculation--(A) Calculation of mortality rate. The mortality rate for 2018 that is applied to male annuitants who are age 66 in 2018 is equal to the product of the mortality rate for 2006 that applied to male annuitants who were age 66 in 2006 (0.013855) and the cumulative mortality improvement factor for age 66 males from 2006 to 2018. The cumulative mortality improvement factor for age 66 males for the period from 2006 to 2018 is 0.8929, and the mortality rate for 2018 for male annuitants who are age 66 in that year would be 0.012371, as shown in the following table. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Annual Scale MP-2016 mortality Cumulative mortality improvement mortality Calendar year improvement factor (1- improvement Mortality rate rate scale MP-2016 factor rate) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2006............................................ n/a n/a n/a 0.013855 2007............................................ 0.0237 0.9763 0.9763 .............. 2008............................................ 0.0211 0.9789 0.9557 .............. 2009............................................ 0.0180 0.9820 0.9385 .............. 2010............................................ 0.0142 0.9858 0.9252 .............. 2011............................................ 0.0099 0.9901 0.9160 .............. 2012............................................ 0.0053 0.9947 0.9112 .............. 2013............................................ 0.0043 0.9957 0.9072 .............. 2014............................................ 0.0035 0.9965 0.9041 .............. 2015............................................ 0.0030 0.9970 0.9014 .............. 2016............................................ 0.0028 0.9972 0.8988 .............. 2017............................................ 0.0030 0.9970 0.8961 .............. 2018............................................ 0.0036 0.9964 0.8929 0.012371 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (B) Probability of survival for an individual. After the projected mortality rates are derived for each age for each year, the rates are used to calculate the present value of a benefit stream that depends on the probability of survival year-by-year. For example, for purposes of calculating the present value (for a 2018 valuation date) of future payments in a benefit stream payable for a male annuitant who is age 66 in 2018, the probability of survival for the annuitant is based on the mortality rate for a male annuitant who is age 66 in 2018 (0.012371), and the projected mortality rate for a male annuitant who will be age 67 in 2019 (0.013302), age 68 in 2020 (0.014321), and so on. (3) Static mortality tables. The static mortality tables that are permitted to be used under section 430(h)(3)(A) and paragraph (a)(1) of this section are updated annually by the IRS according to the methodology described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. Paragraph (e) of this section sets forth static tables that are permitted to be used for valuation dates in 2018. For valuation dates in later years, static mortality tables will be provided in guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. See Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter. (b) Use of the tables--(1) Separate tables for annuitants and nonannuitants--(i) In general. Separate tables are provided for use for annuitants and nonannuitants. The nonannuitant mortality table is applied to determine the probability of survival for a nonannuitant for the period before the nonannuitant is projected to commence receiving benefits. The annuitant mortality table is applied to determine the present value of benefits for each annuitant. In addition, the annuitant mortality table is applied for each nonannuitant with respect to each assumed commencement of benefits for the period beginning with that assumed [[Page 46400]] commencement. For purposes of this section, an annuitant means a plan participant who has commenced receiving benefits, and a nonannuitant means a plan participant who has not yet commenced receiving benefits (for example, an active employee or a terminated vested participant). A participant whose benefit has partially commenced is treated as an annuitant with respect to the portion of the benefit that has commenced and treated as a nonannuitant with respect to the balance of the benefit. In addition, with respect to a beneficiary of a participant, the annuitant mortality table applies for the period beginning with each assumed commencement of benefits for the participant. If the participant has died (or to the extent the participant is assumed to die before commencing benefits), the annuitant mortality table applies with respect to the beneficiary for the period beginning with each assumed commencement of benefits for the beneficiary. (ii) Examples of calculation using separate annuitant and nonannuitant tables. With respect to a 45-year-old active participant who is projected to commence receiving an annuity at age 55, the funding target is determined using the nonannuitant mortality table for the period before the participant attains age 55 (so that, if the static mortality tables are used pursuant to paragraph (a)(3) of this section, the probability of an active male participant living from age 45 to age 55 using the table that applies for a valuation date in 2018 is 0.988857) and using the annuitant mortality table for the period ages 55 and above. Similarly, for a 45-year-old terminated vested participant who is projected to commence an annuity at age 65, the funding target is determined using the nonannuitant mortality table for the period before the participant attains age 65 and using the annuitant mortality table for ages 65 and above. (2) Small plan tables. If static mortality tables are used pursuant to paragraph (a)(3) of this section, as an alternative to the separate static tables specified for annuitants and nonannuitants pursuant to paragraph (b)(1) of this section, combined static tables that apply the same mortality rates to both annuitants and nonannuitants are permitted to be used for a small plan. For this purpose, a small plan is defined as a plan with 500 or fewer total participants (including both active and inactive participants and beneficiaries of deceased participants) on the valuation date. The combined static tables that are permitted to be used for small plans pursuant to this paragraph (b)(2) are constructed from the separate nonannuitant and annuitant static mortality tables using the weighting factors for small plans that are set forth in paragraph (d) of this section. The weighting factors are applied to develop these combined static tables using the following equation: Combined mortality rate = [nonannuitant rate * (1 - weighting factor)] + [annuitant rate * weighting factor]. (c) Static tables--(1) Source of rates. The static mortality tables that are used pursuant to paragraph (a)(3) of this section are determined using the base mortality tables described in paragraph (a)(2)(i)(B) of this section taking into account the mortality improvement rates described in paragraph (a)(2)(i)(C) of this section, in accordance with the rules of paragraph (c)(3) of this section. (2) Selection of static tables. The static mortality tables that are used for a valuation date are the static mortality tables for the calendar year that contains the valuation date. (3) Projection of mortality improvements--(i) General rule. Except as provided in paragraph (c)(3)(iii) of this section, the static mortality tables for a calendar year are determined by multiplying the applicable mortality rate for each age from the base mortality tables by both-- (A) The cumulative mortality improvement factor (determined under the rules of paragraph (a)(2) of this section) for the period from 2006 through that calendar year; and (B) The cumulative mortality improvement factor (determined under the rules of paragraph (a)(2) of this section) for the period beginning in that calendar year and continuing beyond that calendar year for the number of years in the projection period described in paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section. (ii) Projection period for static mortality tables--(A) In general. The projection period is 8 years for males and 9 years for females, as adjusted based on age as provided in paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(B) of this section. (B) Age adjustment. For ages below 80, the projection period is increased by 1 year for each year below age 80. For ages above 80, the projection period is reduced (but not below zero) by \1/3\ year for each year above 80. (iii) Fractional projection periods. If for an age the number of years in the projection period determined under this paragraph (c)(3) is not a whole number, then the mortality rate for that age is determined by using linear interpolation between-- (A) The mortality rate for that age that would be determined under paragraph (c)(3)(i) of this section if the number of years in the projection period were the next lower whole number; and (B) The mortality rate for that age that would be determined under paragraph (c)(3)(i) of this section if the number of years in the projection period were the next higher whole number. (iv) Example. The following example illustrates how the mortality rates in the static mortality tables issued under the provisions of this paragraph (c) are calculated: Example. At age 85, the projection period for a male is 6\1/3\ years (8 years minus \1/3\ year for each of the 5 years above age 80). For a valuation date in 2018, the mortality rate in the static mortality table for an 85-year-old male is based on a projection of mortality improvement for 6\1/3\ years beyond 2018. Under paragraph (c)(3)(iii) of this section, the mortality rate for an 85-year-old male annuitant in the static mortality table for 2018 is \2/3\ times the projected mortality rate for a male annuitant that age in 2024 plus \1/3\ times the projected mortality rate for a male annuitant that age in 2025. Accordingly, the mortality rate for an 85-year-old male annuitant in the static mortality table for 2018 is 0.075196 (\2/3\ times the projected mortality rate for an 85-year old male annuitant in 2024 (0.075447) plus \1/3\ times the projected mortality rate for an 85-year old male annuitant in 2025 (0.074693)). (d) Base mortality tables. The following are the base mortality tables. The base year for these tables is 2006. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Males Females ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Age Weighting Weighting Non-annuitant Annuitant factor for Non-annuitant Annuitant factor for small plans small plans -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0....................................................... 0.008878 0.008878 0 0.007278 0.007278 0 1....................................................... 0.000515 0.000515 0 0.000451 0.000451 0 2....................................................... 0.000348 0.000348 0 0.000295 0.000295 0 3....................................................... 0.000289 0.000289 0 0.000220 0.000220 0 [[Page 46401]] 4....................................................... 0.000225 0.000225 0 0.000165 0.000165 0 5....................................................... 0.000197 0.000197 0 0.000149 0.000149 0 6....................................................... 0.000177 0.000177 0 0.000137 0.000137 0 7....................................................... 0.000156 0.000156 0 0.000127 0.000127 0 8....................................................... 0.000132 0.000132 0 0.000117 0.000117 0 9....................................................... 0.000107 0.000107 0 0.000109 0.000109 0 10...................................................... 0.000090 0.000090 0 0.000102 0.000102 0 11...................................................... 0.000095 0.000095 0 0.000105 0.000105 0 12...................................................... 0.000142 0.000142 0 0.000121 0.000121 0 13...................................................... 0.000187 0.000187 0 0.000137 0.000137 0 14...................................................... 0.000230 0.000230 0 0.000151 0.000151 0 15...................................................... 0.000274 0.000274 0 0.000165 0.000165 0 16...................................................... 0.000318 0.000318 0 0.000177 0.000177 0 17...................................................... 0.000364 0.000364 0 0.000187 0.000187 0 18...................................................... 0.000412 0.000412 0 0.000196 0.000196 0 19...................................................... 0.000463 0.000463 0 0.000202 0.000202 0 20...................................................... 0.000510 0.000510 0 0.000202 0.000202 0 21...................................................... 0.000552 0.000552 0 0.000197 0.000197 0 22...................................................... 0.000587 0.000587 0 0.000191 0.000191 0 23...................................................... 0.000599 0.000599 0 0.000190 0.000190 0 24...................................................... 0.000594 0.000594 0 0.000188 0.000188 0 25...................................................... 0.000545 0.000545 0 0.000186 0.000186 0 26...................................................... 0.000510 0.000510 0 0.000186 0.000186 0 27...................................................... 0.000486 0.000486 0 0.000188 0.000188 0 28...................................................... 0.000472 0.000472 0 0.000192 0.000192 0 29...................................................... 0.000468 0.000468 0 0.000198 0.000198 0 30...................................................... 0.000470 0.000470 0 0.000209 0.000209 0 31...................................................... 0.000480 0.000480 0 0.000222 0.000222 0 32...................................................... 0.000495 0.000495 0 0.000238 0.000238 0 33...................................................... 0.000514 0.000514 0 0.000257 0.000257 0 34...................................................... 0.000534 0.000534 0 0.000278 0.000278 0 35...................................................... 0.000557 0.000557 0 0.000301 0.000301 0 36...................................................... 0.000581 0.000581 0 0.000325 0.000325 0 37...................................................... 0.000611 0.000611 0 0.000355 0.000355 0 38...................................................... 0.000648 0.000648 0 0.000389 0.000389 0 39...................................................... 0.000694 0.000694 0 0.000428 0.000428 0 40...................................................... 0.000750 0.000750 0 0.000471 0.000471 0 41...................................................... 0.000814 0.000823 .0045 0.000518 0.000515 0 42...................................................... 0.000890 0.000969 .0091 0.000570 0.000603 0 43...................................................... 0.000982 0.001188 .0136 0.000628 0.000735 0 44...................................................... 0.001088 0.001480 .0181 0.000691 0.000911 0 45...................................................... 0.001207 0.001846 .0226 0.000758 0.001131 .0084 46...................................................... 0.001342 0.002285 .0272 0.000831 0.001395 .0167 47...................................................... 0.001487 0.002797 .0317 0.000908 0.001703 .0251 48...................................................... 0.001643 0.003382 .0362 0.000986 0.002055 .0335 49...................................................... 0.001807 0.004040 .0407 0.001065 0.002451 .0419 50...................................................... 0.001979 0.004771 .0453 0.001151 0.002891 .0502 51...................................................... 0.002159 0.005059 .0498 0.001242 0.002993 .0586 52...................................................... 0.002351 0.005343 .0686 0.001344 0.003124 .0744 53...................................................... 0.002539 0.005592 .0953 0.001458 0.003291 .0947 54...................................................... 0.002741 0.005839 .1288 0.001588 0.003499 .1189 55...................................................... 0.002967 0.006102 .2066 0.001735 0.003755 .1897 56...................................................... 0.003231 0.006399 .3173 0.001902 0.004065 .2857 57...................................................... 0.003548 0.006746 .3780 0.002091 0.004435 .3403 58...................................................... 0.003932 0.007155 .4401 0.002302 0.004869 .3878 59...................................................... 0.004396 0.007639 .4986 0.002537 0.005373 .4360 60...................................................... 0.004954 0.008211 .5633 0.002795 0.005942 .4954 61...................................................... 0.005616 0.008878 .6338 0.003080 0.006581 .5805 62...................................................... 0.006392 0.009646 .7103 0.003388 0.007283 .6598 63...................................................... 0.007291 0.010523 .7902 0.003724 0.008043 .7520 64...................................................... 0.008320 0.011514 .8355 0.004089 0.008870 .8043 65...................................................... 0.009486 0.012621 .8832 0.004482 0.009760 .8552 66...................................................... 0.010668 0.013855 .9321 0.005004 0.010731 .9118 67...................................................... 0.011973 0.015221 .9510 0.005575 0.011790 .9367 68...................................................... 0.013414 0.016736 .9639 0.006205 0.012952 .9523 69...................................................... 0.015006 0.018421 .9714 0.006898 0.014226 .9627 70...................................................... 0.016761 0.020288 .9740 0.007662 0.015628 .9661 71...................................................... 0.018690 0.022348 .9766 0.008507 0.017170 .9695 72...................................................... 0.020824 0.024638 .9792 0.009438 0.018861 .9729 73...................................................... 0.023176 0.027176 .9818 0.010470 0.020723 .9763 [[Page 46402]] 74...................................................... 0.025770 0.029992 .9844 0.011615 0.022780 .9797 75...................................................... 0.028623 0.033113 .9870 0.012887 0.025057 .9830 76...................................................... 0.031761 0.036585 .9896 0.014301 0.027590 .9864 77...................................................... 0.035214 0.040457 .9922 0.015885 0.030438 .9898 78...................................................... 0.039007 0.044778 .9948 0.017656 0.033653 .9932 79...................................................... 0.043169 0.049605 .9974 0.019639 0.037296 .9966 80...................................................... 0.047750 0.055022 1.0 0.021859 0.041440 1.0 81...................................................... 0.049804 0.061087 1.0 0.023791 0.046181 1.0 82...................................................... 0.053911 0.067902 1.0 0.027655 0.051564 1.0 83...................................................... 0.060072 0.075550 1.0 0.033451 0.057714 1.0 84...................................................... 0.068286 0.084162 1.0 0.041179 0.064709 1.0 85...................................................... 0.078554 0.093775 1.0 0.050838 0.072601 1.0 86...................................................... 0.090876 0.104507 1.0 0.062429 0.081490 1.0 87...................................................... 0.105251 0.116487 1.0 0.075952 0.091444 1.0 88...................................................... 0.121680 0.129770 1.0 0.091407 0.102470 1.0 89...................................................... 0.140162 0.144470 1.0 0.108794 0.114635 1.0 90...................................................... 0.160698 0.160698 1.0 0.128113 0.128113 1.0 91...................................................... 0.177741 0.177741 1.0 0.142619 0.142619 1.0 92...................................................... 0.195154 0.195154 1.0 0.157939 0.157939 1.0 93...................................................... 0.212642 0.212642 1.0 0.173886 0.173886 1.0 94...................................................... 0.230055 0.230055 1.0 0.190319 0.190319 1.0 95...................................................... 0.247257 0.247257 1.0 0.207191 0.207191 1.0 96...................................................... 0.265940 0.265940 1.0 0.225057 0.225057 1.0 97...................................................... 0.284940 0.284940 1.0 0.243507 0.243507 1.0 98...................................................... 0.304432 0.304432 1.0 0.262587 0.262587 1.0 99...................................................... 0.324272 0.324272 1.0 0.282171 0.282171 1.0 100..................................................... 0.344364 0.344364 1.0 0.302162 0.302162 1.0 101..................................................... 0.364420 0.364420 1.0 0.322282 0.322282 1.0 102..................................................... 0.384058 0.384058 1.0 0.342371 0.342371 1.0 103..................................................... 0.403188 0.403188 1.0 0.362210 0.362210 1.0 104..................................................... 0.421533 0.421533 1.0 0.381534 0.381534 1.0 105..................................................... 0.438903 0.438903 1.0 0.400321 0.400321 1.0 106..................................................... 0.455492 0.455492 1.0 0.418418 0.418418 1.0 107..................................................... 0.470810 0.470810 1.0 0.435390 0.435390 1.0 108..................................................... 0.484965 0.484965 1.0 0.451459 0.451459 1.0 109..................................................... 0.498023 0.498023 1.0 0.466408 0.466408 1.0 110..................................................... 0.509768 0.509768 1.0 0.480123 0.480123 1.0 111..................................................... 0.512472 0.512472 1.0 0.492664 0.492664 1.0 112..................................................... 0.509296 0.509296 1.0 0.503970 0.503970 1.0 113..................................................... 0.506193 0.506193 1.0 0.507361 0.507361 1.0 114..................................................... 0.503061 0.503061 1.0 0.503564 0.503564 1.0 115..................................................... 0.500000 0.500000 1.0 0.500000 0.500000 1.0 116..................................................... 0.500000 0.500000 1.0 0.500000 0.500000 1.0 117..................................................... 0.500000 0.500000 1.0 0.500000 0.500000 1.0 118..................................................... 0.500000 0.500000 1.0 0.500000 0.500000 1.0 119..................................................... 0.500000 0.500000 1.0 0.500000 0.500000 1.0 120..................................................... 1.000000 1.000000 1.0 1.000000 1.000000 1.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (e) Static tables for 2018. The following static mortality tables are used pursuant to paragraph (a)(3) of this section for determining present value or making any computation under section 430 with respect to valuation dates occurring during 2018. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Males Females ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Optional Optional Age combined table combined table Non-annuitant Annuitant for small Non-annuitant Annuitant for small plans plans -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0....................................................... 0.002420 0.002420 0.002420 0.002234 0.002234 0.002234 1....................................................... 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 0.000140 0.000140 0.000140 2....................................................... 0.000097 0.000097 0.000097 0.000092 0.000092 0.000092 3....................................................... 0.000081 0.000081 0.000081 0.000070 0.000070 0.000070 4....................................................... 0.000064 0.000064 0.000064 0.000053 0.000053 0.000053 5....................................................... 0.000056 0.000056 0.000056 0.000048 0.000048 0.000048 6....................................................... 0.000051 0.000051 0.000051 0.000045 0.000045 0.000045 7....................................................... 0.000046 0.000046 0.000046 0.000042 0.000042 0.000042 8....................................................... 0.000039 0.000039 0.000039 0.000039 0.000039 0.000039 [[Page 46403]] 9....................................................... 0.000032 0.000032 0.000032 0.000037 0.000037 0.000037 10...................................................... 0.000027 0.000027 0.000027 0.000035 0.000035 0.000035 11...................................................... 0.000029 0.000029 0.000029 0.000036 0.000036 0.000036 12...................................................... 0.000044 0.000044 0.000044 0.000042 0.000042 0.000042 13...................................................... 0.000058 0.000058 0.000058 0.000048 0.000048 0.000048 14...................................................... 0.000072 0.000072 0.000072 0.000053 0.000053 0.000053 15...................................................... 0.000087 0.000087 0.000087 0.000059 0.000059 0.000059 16...................................................... 0.000102 0.000102 0.000102 0.000064 0.000064 0.000064 17...................................................... 0.000118 0.000118 0.000118 0.000068 0.000068 0.000068 18...................................................... 0.000135 0.000135 0.000135 0.000072 0.000072 0.000072 19...................................................... 0.000153 0.000153 0.000153 0.000075 0.000075 0.000075 20...................................................... 0.000170 0.000170 0.000170 0.000076 0.000076 0.000076 21...................................................... 0.000192 0.000192 0.000192 0.000078 0.000078 0.000078 22...................................................... 0.000214 0.000214 0.000214 0.000080 0.000080 0.000080 23...................................................... 0.000229 0.000229 0.000229 0.000084 0.000084 0.000084 24...................................................... 0.000238 0.000238 0.000238 0.000087 0.000087 0.000087 25...................................................... 0.000230 0.000230 0.000230 0.000090 0.000090 0.000090 26...................................................... 0.000226 0.000226 0.000226 0.000094 0.000094 0.000094 27...................................................... 0.000226 0.000226 0.000226 0.000099 0.000099 0.000099 28...................................................... 0.000230 0.000230 0.000230 0.000105 0.000105 0.000105 29...................................................... 0.000238 0.000238 0.000238 0.000111 0.000111 0.000111 30...................................................... 0.000249 0.000249 0.000249 0.000120 0.000120 0.000120 31...................................................... 0.000263 0.000263 0.000263 0.000130 0.000130 0.000130 32...................................................... 0.000278 0.000278 0.000278 0.000142 0.000142 0.000142 33...................................................... 0.000294 0.000294 0.000294 0.000155 0.000155 0.000155 34...................................................... 0.000309 0.000309 0.000309 0.000168 0.000168 0.000168 35...................................................... 0.000323 0.000323 0.000323 0.000182 0.000182 0.000182 36...................................................... 0.000336 0.000336 0.000336 0.000196 0.000196 0.000196 37...................................................... 0.000350 0.000350 0.000350 0.000213 0.000213 0.000213 38...................................................... 0.000366 0.000366 0.000366 0.000231 0.000231 0.000231 39...................................................... 0.000385 0.000385 0.000385 0.000251 0.000251 0.000251 40...................................................... 0.000410 0.000410 0.000410 0.000273 0.000273 0.000273 41...................................................... 0.000438 0.000443 0.000438 0.000298 0.000296 0.000298 42...................................................... 0.000474 0.000516 0.000474 0.000326 0.000344 0.000326 43...................................................... 0.000518 0.000627 0.000519 0.000358 0.000419 0.000358 44...................................................... 0.000573 0.000779 0.000577 0.000395 0.000520 0.000395 45...................................................... 0.000636 0.000973 0.000644 0.000436 0.000651 0.000438 46...................................................... 0.000712 0.001213 0.000726 0.000484 0.000813 0.000489 47...................................................... 0.000798 0.001502 0.000820 0.000538 0.001010 0.000550 48...................................................... 0.000896 0.001844 0.000930 0.000597 0.001245 0.000619 49...................................................... 0.001005 0.002248 0.001056 0.000661 0.001522 0.000697 50...................................................... 0.001128 0.002719 0.001200 0.000734 0.001844 0.000790 51...................................................... 0.001265 0.002963 0.001350 0.000814 0.001961 0.000881 52...................................................... 0.001418 0.003224 0.001542 0.000903 0.002099 0.000992 53...................................................... 0.001580 0.003481 0.001761 0.001003 0.002263 0.001122 54...................................................... 0.001761 0.003751 0.002017 0.001114 0.002454 0.001273 55...................................................... 0.001964 0.004040 0.002393 0.001235 0.002673 0.001508 56...................................................... 0.002200 0.004357 0.002884 0.001367 0.002921 0.001811 57...................................................... 0.002474 0.004704 0.003317 0.001509 0.003200 0.002084 58...................................................... 0.002796 0.005088 0.003805 0.001661 0.003512 0.002379 59...................................................... 0.003174 0.005515 0.004341 0.001823 0.003860 0.002711 60...................................................... 0.003613 0.005989 0.004951 0.001994 0.004238 0.003106 61...................................................... 0.004122 0.006516 0.005639 0.002181 0.004659 0.003619 62...................................................... 0.004705 0.007100 0.006406 0.002381 0.005119 0.004188 63...................................................... 0.005364 0.007742 0.007243 0.002600 0.005616 0.004868 64...................................................... 0.006111 0.008457 0.008071 0.002842 0.006165 0.005515 65...................................................... 0.006940 0.009234 0.008966 0.003107 0.006766 0.006236 66...................................................... 0.007779 0.010103 0.009945 0.003465 0.007430 0.007080 67...................................................... 0.008697 0.011056 0.010940 0.003863 0.008170 0.007897 68...................................................... 0.009709 0.012114 0.012027 0.004308 0.008993 0.008770 69...................................................... 0.010836 0.013302 0.013231 0.004806 0.009912 0.009722 70...................................................... 0.012093 0.014637 0.014571 0.005366 0.010945 0.010756 71...................................................... 0.013486 0.016126 0.016064 0.006001 0.012111 0.011925 72...................................................... 0.015044 0.017799 0.017742 0.006711 0.013412 0.013230 73...................................................... 0.016794 0.019693 0.019640 0.007521 0.014886 0.014711 74...................................................... 0.018751 0.021823 0.021775 0.008439 0.016552 0.016387 75...................................................... 0.020950 0.024237 0.024194 0.009485 0.018443 0.018291 76...................................................... 0.023428 0.026986 0.026949 0.010678 0.020600 0.020465 77...................................................... 0.026183 0.030081 0.030051 0.012035 0.023061 0.022949 78...................................................... 0.029308 0.033645 0.033622 0.013582 0.025888 0.025804 [[Page 46404]] 79...................................................... 0.032774 0.037661 0.037648 0.015347 0.029144 0.029097 80...................................................... 0.036705 0.042295 0.042295 0.017347 0.032886 0.032886 81...................................................... 0.038556 0.047291 0.047291 0.019058 0.036992 0.036992 82...................................................... 0.042087 0.053009 0.053009 0.022345 0.041662 0.041662 83...................................................... 0.047283 0.059466 0.059466 0.027251 0.047017 0.047017 84...................................................... 0.054248 0.066860 0.066860 0.033811 0.053130 0.053130 85...................................................... 0.062990 0.075196 0.075196 0.042053 0.060056 0.060056 86...................................................... 0.073605 0.084646 0.084646 0.052009 0.067888 0.067888 87...................................................... 0.086115 0.095308 0.095308 0.063725 0.076724 0.076724 88...................................................... 0.100513 0.107196 0.107196 0.077205 0.086549 0.086549 89...................................................... 0.116840 0.120431 0.120431 0.092462 0.097426 0.097426 90...................................................... 0.135087 0.135087 0.135087 0.109484 0.109484 0.109484 91...................................................... 0.150610 0.150610 0.150610 0.122541 0.122541 0.122541 92...................................................... 0.166534 0.166534 0.166534 0.136397 0.136397 0.136397 93...................................................... 0.182546 0.182546 0.182546 0.150811 0.150811 0.150811 94...................................................... 0.198598 0.198598 0.198598 0.165818 0.165818 0.165818 95...................................................... 0.214442 0.214442 0.214442 0.181360 0.181360 0.181360 96...................................................... 0.232944 0.232944 0.232944 0.198746 0.198746 0.198746 97...................................................... 0.251903 0.251903 0.251903 0.216930 0.216930 0.216930 98...................................................... 0.271612 0.271612 0.271612 0.235921 0.235921 0.235921 99...................................................... 0.291889 0.291889 0.291889 0.255617 0.255617 0.255617 100..................................................... 0.312680 0.312680 0.312680 0.275938 0.275938 0.275938 101..................................................... 0.333720 0.333720 0.333720 0.296628 0.296628 0.296628 102..................................................... 0.354570 0.354570 0.354570 0.317471 0.317471 0.317471 103..................................................... 0.375136 0.375136 0.375136 0.338385 0.338385 0.338385 104..................................................... 0.395172 0.395172 0.395172 0.358868 0.358868 0.358868 105..................................................... 0.413945 0.413945 0.413945 0.379183 0.379183 0.379183 106..................................................... 0.432145 0.432145 0.432145 0.398878 0.398878 0.398878 107..................................................... 0.449197 0.449197 0.449197 0.417703 0.417703 0.417703 108..................................................... 0.465497 0.465497 0.465497 0.435384 0.435384 0.435384 109..................................................... 0.480869 0.480869 0.480869 0.452108 0.452108 0.452108 110..................................................... 0.495080 0.495080 0.495080 0.467928 0.467928 0.467928 111..................................................... 0.500557 0.500557 0.500557 0.482562 0.482562 0.482562 112..................................................... 0.500454 0.500454 0.500454 0.496164 0.496164 0.496164 113..................................................... 0.500352 0.500352 0.500352 0.502110 0.502110 0.502110 114..................................................... 0.500201 0.500201 0.500201 0.500952 0.500952 0.500952 115..................................................... 0.500000 0.500000 0.500000 0.500000 0.500000 0.500000 116..................................................... 0.500000 0.500000 0.500000 0.500000 0.500000 0.500000 117..................................................... 0.500000 0.500000 0.500000 0.500000 0.500000 0.500000 118..................................................... 0.500000 0.500000 0.500000 0.500000 0.500000 0.500000 119..................................................... 0.500000 0.500000 0.500000 0.500000 0.500000 0.500000 120..................................................... 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (f) Effective/applicability date--(1) In general. Except as provided in paragraph (f)(2) of this section, this section applies to plan years beginning or after January 1, 2018. (2) Option to apply prior regulations in certain circumstances. For a plan for which substitute mortality tables are not used pursuant to Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-2 for a plan year beginning during 2018, mortality tables determined in accordance with Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1 as in effect on December 31, 2017 (as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2017) may be used for purposes of applying the rules of section 430 for a valuation date occurring during 2018 if the plan sponsor-- (i) Concludes that the use of mortality tables determined in accordance with this section for the plan year would be administratively impracticable or would result in an adverse business impact that is greater than de minimis; and (ii) Informs the actuary of the intent to apply the option under this paragraph (f)(2). 0 Par. 3. Section 1.430(h)(3)-2 is revised to read as follows: Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-2 Plan-specific substitute mortality tables used to determine present value. (a) In general. This section provides rules for the use of substitute mortality tables under section 430(h)(3)(C) in determining any present value or making any computation under section 430 in accordance with Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1(a)(1). To use substitute mortality tables for a plan, a plan sponsor must first obtain approval to use the tables in accordance with the procedures described in paragraph (b) of this section. Paragraph (c) of this section provides rules for the development of substitute mortality tables, including guidelines providing that a plan must have either fully or partially credible mortality information in order to use substitute mortality tables. Paragraph (d) of this section describes the requirements for full credibility. Paragraph (e) of this section describes the requirements for partial credibility. Paragraph (f) of this section provides special rules for newly-affiliated plans. Paragraph (g) of this section specifies the effective date and applicability date of this section. The Commissioner may, in revenue rulings and procedures, notices, or other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (see Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter), provide additional guidance regarding approval and use of substitute mortality [[Page 46405]] tables under section 430(h)(3)(C) and related matters. (b) Procedures for obtaining approval to use substitute mortality tables--(1) Written request for approval to use substitute mortality tables--(i) General requirements. To use substitute mortality tables, a plan sponsor must first submit a written request to the Commissioner demonstrating that those substitute mortality tables meet the requirements of section 430(h)(3)(C) and this section. This request must specify the first plan year, and the term of years (not more than 10), for which the tables are to apply. (ii) Time for written request. Substitute mortality tables may not be used for a plan year unless the plan sponsor submits the written request described in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section at least 7 months before the first day of the first plan year for which the substitute mortality tables are to apply. (2) Commissioner's review of request--(i) In general. During the 180-day period that begins on the date the plan sponsor submits a request for approval to use substitute mortality tables for a plan pursuant to this section, the Commissioner will determine whether the request for approval to use substitute mortality tables satisfies the requirements of this section (including any published guidance issued pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section), and will either approve or deny the request. The Commissioner will deny a request if the request fails to meet the requirements of this section or if the Commissioner determines that a substitute mortality table does not reflect the actual mortality experience of the applicable population. (ii) Request for additional information. The Commissioner may request additional information with respect to the submission and deny a request to use substitute mortality tables if the additional information is not provided in a timely manner. (iii) Deemed approval. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2)(iv) of this section, if the Commissioner does not issue a denial within the 180-day review period, the request is deemed to have been approved. (iv) Extension of time permitted. The Commissioner and a plan sponsor may, before the expiration of the 180-day review period, agree in writing to extend that period. (c) Development of substitute mortality tables--(1) Substitute mortality tables must be used for all plans in controlled group--(i) General rule. Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (c), substitute mortality tables are permitted to be used for a plan for a plan year only if, for that plan year (or any portion of that plan year), substitute mortality tables are also approved and used for each other pension plan subject to the requirements of section 430 that is maintained by the plan sponsor and by each member of the plan sponsor's controlled group. For purposes of this section, the term controlled group means any group that is treated as a single employer under paragraph (b), (c), (m), or (o) of section 414. See paragraph (c)(7) of this section for special rules applicable to multiple-employer plans. (ii) Treatment of plans without credible mortality information. The rule of paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section does not prohibit use of substitute mortality tables for one plan for a plan year if the only other plan or plans maintained by the plan sponsor (or by a member of the plan sponsor's controlled group) for which substitute mortality tables are not used are too small to have fully or partially credible mortality information for the plan year. For this purpose, the demonstration that neither males nor females under a plan have credible mortality information for a plan year must be made by analyzing the actual number of deaths over a period that is the same length as the longest experience study period used for any plan within the controlled group and that ends less than three years before the first day of the plan year. (2) Mortality experience requirements--(i) In general. Substitute mortality tables must reflect the actual mortality experience of the pension plan for which the tables will be used, and that mortality experience must consist of credible mortality information as described in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section. Separate substitute mortality tables must be established for each gender and, except as provided in paragraph (d)(6) of this section, a substitute mortality table is permitted to be established for a gender only if the plan has credible mortality information for that gender. See paragraph (d)(5) of this section for rules permitting the use of substitute mortality tables for separate populations within a gender in certain circumstances. (ii) Credible mortality information--(A) In general. A plan has credible mortality information for a gender if and only if the mortality experience with respect to that gender satisfies the requirement for either full credibility (as described in paragraph (d) of this section) or partial credibility (as described in paragraph (e) of this section). (B) Simplified rule. Whether there is credible mortality information for a gender may be determined by only taking into account people who are at least age 50 and less than age 100. If there is credible mortality information for a gender using this simplified rule, the entire gender (not just those who are at least age 50 and less than age 100) has credible mortality information. (iii) Gender without credible mortality information--(A) In general. If, for the first plan year substitute mortality tables will be used for a plan, one gender has credible mortality information but the other gender does not have credible mortality information, then substitute mortality tables are established for the gender that has credible mortality information, and the mortality tables under Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1 are used for the gender that does not have credible mortality information. For a subsequent plan year, the plan sponsor may continue to use substitute mortality tables for the gender with credible mortality information without using substitute mortality tables for the other gender only if the other gender continues to lack credible mortality information for that subsequent plan year. (B) Demonstration of lack of credible mortality information for a gender. The demonstration that a gender does not have credible mortality information (that is, the individuals of that gender had fewer than the minimum number of actual deaths to have partial credibility, as described in paragraph (e)(1) of this section) for a plan year must be made by analyzing the actual number of deaths over a period that is the same length as the period for the experience study on which the substitute mortality tables are based and that ends less than three years before the first day of the plan year. (3) Determination of substitute mortality tables--(i) Requirement to use generational mortality table. A plan's substitute mortality tables must be generational mortality tables. A plan's substitute mortality tables are determined using the plan's base substitute mortality tables developed pursuant to paragraph (d) or (e) of this section and the mortality improvement factors described in paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section. (ii) Determination of mortality improvement factors. The mortality improvement factor for an age and gender is the cumulative mortality improvement factor determined under Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1(a)(2)(i)(E) for that age and gender for the applicable period. The applicable period is the period beginning with the base year for the [[Page 46406]] base substitute mortality table determined under paragraph (d) or (e) of this section and ending in the calendar year in which the individual attains the age for which the probability of death is being determined. The base year for the base substitute mortality table is the calendar year that contains the day before the midpoint of the experience study period. (4) Disabled individuals. Under section 430(h)(3)(D), separate mortality tables are permitted to be used for certain disabled individuals. If the separate mortality tables issued under section 430(h)(3)(D) for certain disabled individuals are used, then those disabled individuals are disregarded for all purposes under this section. Thus, if the mortality tables under section 430(h)(3)(D) are used for disabled individuals under a plan, mortality experience with respect to those individuals must be excluded in developing mortality rates for substitute mortality tables under this section. (5) Aggregation--(i) Permissive aggregation of plans. A plan sponsor may use the same substitute mortality tables for two or more of its plans provided that the rules of this section are applied by treating those plans as a single plan. In such a case, the substitute mortality tables must be based on data collected with respect to those aggregated plans. (ii) Required aggregation of plans. In general, plans are not required to be aggregated for purposes of applying the rules of this section. However, for purposes of this section, a plan is required to be aggregated with any plan that was previously spun off from that plan if a purpose of the spinoff is to avoid the use of substitute mortality tables for any of the plans that were involved in the spinoff. (iii) Special rule regarding experience study if aggregated plans have different plan years. If two or more plans are aggregated pursuant to this paragraph (c)(5) and not all of the plans have the same plan year, then the experience study period may be a period that is not a multiple of 12 months, provided that-- (A) The period over which mortality experience is collected for each plan (the data study period) is a multiple of 12 months and is based on the plan year for that plan; (B) The data study periods for all of the plans consist of the same number of years; (C) The data study periods for all of the plans satisfy the experience study period requirements of paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this section; and (D) The data study periods for all of the plans have been selected to minimize the total period of time covered by the experience study period by overlapping (to the greatest extent possible) those data study periods. (6) Duration of use of tables--(i) General rule. Except as provided in this paragraph (c)(6), substitute mortality tables are used for a plan for the term of consecutive plan years specified in the plan sponsor's written request for approval to use such tables under paragraph (b)(1) of this section and approved by the Commissioner, or a shorter period prescribed by the Commissioner in the approval to use substitute mortality tables. Following the end of the approved term of use, or following any early termination of use described in this paragraph (c)(6), the mortality tables specified in Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1 must be used for the plan unless approval under paragraph (b)(1) of this section has been received by the plan sponsor to use substitute mortality tables based on an updated experience study for a further term. (ii) Early termination of use of tables. A plan's substitute mortality tables must not be used beginning with the earliest of-- (A) For a plan using a substitute mortality table for only one gender because of a lack of credible mortality information with respect to the other gender, the first plan year for which there is credible mortality information with respect to the gender that had lacked credible mortality information (unless an approved substitute mortality table is used for that gender); (B) The first plan year for which the plan fails to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (c)(1) of this section (regarding use of substitute mortality tables for all plans in the controlled group), taking into account the rules of paragraph (f)(3) of this section (regarding the transition period for newly-affiliated plans); (C) The second plan year following the plan year for which there is a significant change in individuals covered by the plan as described in paragraph (c)(6)(iii) of this section; (D) The first plan year following the plan year for which a substitute mortality table used for a population is no longer accurately predictive of future mortality of that population, as determined by the Commissioner or as certified by the plan's actuary to the satisfaction of the Commissioner; or (E) The date specified in guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (see Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter) in conjunction with a replacement of mortality tables specified under section 430(h)(3)(A) and Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1 (other than annual updates to the static mortality tables issued pursuant to Sec. 1.430(h)(3)- 1(a)(3) or changes to the mortality improvement rates pursuant to Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1(a)(2)(i)(C)). (iii) Significant change in coverage--(A) Change in coverage from time of experience study. For purposes of applying the rules of paragraph (c)(6)(ii)(C) of this section, a significant change in the individuals covered by a substitute mortality table for a plan year occurs if the number of individuals covered by the substitute mortality table for the plan year is less than 80 percent or more than 120 percent of the average number of individuals in that population over the years covered by the experience study on which the substitute mortality tables are based. However, a change in coverage is not treated as significant if the plan's actuary certifies in writing to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the substitute mortality tables used for the population continue to be accurately predictive of future mortality of that population (taking into account the effect of the change in the population). (B) Change in coverage from time of certification. For purposes of applying the rules of paragraph (c)(6)(ii)(C) of this section, a significant change in the individuals covered by a substitute mortality table for a plan year occurs if the number of individuals covered by the substitute mortality table for the plan year is less than 80 percent or more than 120 percent of the number of individuals covered by the substitute mortality table in a plan year for which a certification described in paragraph (c)(6)(iii)(A) of this section was made on account of a prior change in coverage. However, a change in coverage is not treated as significant if the plan's actuary certifies in writing to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the substitute mortality tables used by the plan with respect to the covered population continue to be accurately predictive of future mortality of that population (taking into account the effect of the change in the population). (7) Multiple-employer plans--(i) General rule. In the case of a multiple-employer plan described in section 413(c), the plan administrator (as described in section 414(g)) is treated as the plan sponsor for purposes of this section. If approval is received to use substitute mortality tables by a plan, those tables must apply on a plan-wide basis (even if the plan is subject to the rules of section 413(c)(4)(A)). (ii) Application of controlled group consistency rules. In the case of an [[Page 46407]] employer that participates in a multiple-employer plan, if the proportion of the plan's funding target attributable to the employees and former employees of the employer and members of its controlled group represents more than 50 percent of the plan's funding target, then the employer is treated as maintaining the plan for purposes of paragraph (c)(1) of this section. Thus, for a multiple-employer plan with credible mortality information that is treated as maintained by an employer under this paragraph (c)(7), unless substitute mortality tables are used for that plan, substitute mortality tables may not be used for any plan maintained by that employer or a member of its controlled group (and if substitute mortality tables are used for any other plan maintained by any member of the employer's controlled group, they must be used for the multiple-employer plan). By contrast, if the proportion of the plan's funding target attributable to the employees and former employees of the employer and members of its controlled group represents 50 percent or less of the funding target for a multiple-employer plan in which it participates, then the employer is not treated as maintaining the plan for purposes of paragraph (c)(1) of this section. Accordingly, whether substitute mortality tables may be used for other plans in such an employer's controlled group is independent of whether substitute mortality tables are used for the multiple-employer plan. (d) Full credibility--(1) In general. The mortality experience with respect to a gender or other population within a plan has full credibility if the actual number of deaths for that population during the experience study period described in paragraph (d)(2) of this section is at least the full credibility threshold described in paragraph (d)(3) of this section. Paragraph (d)(4) of this section provides rules for the creation of a base substitute mortality table from the experience study, which apply if the mortality experience for the population has full credibility. Paragraph (d)(5) of this section provides rules regarding the use of separate substitute mortality tables for plan populations within a gender. Paragraph (d)(6) of this section provides an option to use the combined mortality experience of both genders to determine the existence and extent of credible mortality information and to develop a single mortality ratio for use in constructing substitute mortality tables. (2) Experience study period requirements--(i) General rule. The base substitute mortality table for a gender or other population must be developed from an experience study of the mortality experience of that population that is collected over an experience study period. The experience study period must consist of 2, 3, 4, or 5 consecutive 12- month periods, and must be the same period for all populations except as provided in paragraph (c)(5)(iii) of this section. (ii) Requirement to use recent experience data--(A) General rule. Except as provided in paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(B) of this section, the last day of the experience study period must be less than 3 years before the first day of the first plan year for which the substitute mortality tables are to apply. For example, if January 1, 2019, is the first day of the first plan year for which the substitute mortality tables will be used, then an experience study using calendar year data generally must include data collected for a period that ends no earlier than December 31, 2016. (B) Exception for submission between 1 and 2 years before effective date of table. If the plan sponsor submits a request for approval to use of substitute mortality tables more than 1 year (and less than 2 years) before the first day of the first plan year for which the substitute mortality tables are to apply, then the experience study is not treated as failing to satisfy the rule in paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(A) of this section if the last day of the final year reflected in the experience data is less than 2 years before the date of submission. For example, if an application for approval to use of substitute mortality tables that would apply for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2019 year is submitted in 2017, then an experience study using calendar year data may be based on data collected for a period that ends as early as December 31, 2015. (iii) Experience study based on benefit amount. As provided in paragraph (d)(4)(i) of this section, the mortality rates under the base substitute mortality tables are amounts-weighted mortality rates that are derived from the experience study. An individual's benefit amount (which is used to determine amounts-weighted mortality rates and for other purposes under this paragraph (d)) is the individual's accrued benefit expressed in the form of an annual benefit commencing at normal retirement age (or at the current age, if later) if an individual has not commenced benefits and the individual's annual payment if the individual has commenced benefits. Because amounts-weighted mortality rates for a plan are determined using benefit amounts, the experience study used to develop a base substitute mortality table may not include periods before the plan was established. (3) Full credibility threshold--(i) Threshold number of deaths. The full credibility threshold for a gender or other population is the product of 1,082 and the population's benefit dispersion factor. In calculating the population's benefit dispersion factor, for purposes of paragraphs (d)(3)(iii), (iv), and (v) of this section, the population is adjusted, as appropriate, for individuals who leave the population on account of a reason other than death. (ii) Population's benefit dispersion factor. The population's benefit dispersion factor is equal to-- (A) The number of expected deaths for the population during the experience study period (as defined in paragraph (d)(3)(iii) of this section); multiplied by (B) The sum of the mortality-weighted squares of the benefits (as defined in paragraph (d)(3)(iv) of this section); divided by (C) The square of the sum of the mortality-weighted benefits (as defined in paragraph (d)(3)(v) of this section). (iii) Number of expected deaths. For a population, the number of expected deaths during the experience study period is equal to the sum, for all years in the experience study period, of the expected number of deaths in the population during the year using the mortality rates from the standard mortality tables determined under paragraph (d)(4)(iii) of this section. This amount is equal to: [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR05OC17.000 Where E is equal to the number of years in the experience study period, t represents each year during the experience study period, x represents an individual in the population during year t, qxt is the mortality rate for that individual's age and gender for the calendar year in which year t begins under the applicable standard mortality table determined under paragraph (d)(4)(iii) of this section, and Nt is equal to the number of individuals in the population in year t. (iv) Sum of the mortality-weighted squares of the benefits--(A) Determination. For a population, the sum of the mortality-weighted squares of the benefits is the sum, for all years in the experience study period, for all individuals in the population at the beginning of the year, of the product of-- (1) The probability of death for the individual using the mortality rate for [[Page 46408]] the individual's age and gender from the standard mortality table determined under paragraph (d)(4)(iii) of this section; and (2) The square of the benefit amount for the individual. (B) Expression as formula. The sum of the mortality-weighted squares of the benefits for a population determined pursuant to paragraph (d)(3)(iv)(A) of this section is equal to: [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR05OC17.001 Where E is equal to the number of years in the experience study period, t represents each year during the experience study period, x represents an individual in the population during year t, qxt is the mortality rate for that individual's age and gender for the calendar year in which year t begins under the applicable standard mortality table determined under paragraph (d)(4)(iii) of this section, bxt is equal to the benefit amount for that individual for year t, and Nt is equal to the number of individuals in the population in year t. (v) Square of the sum of the mortality-weighted benefits--(A) Determination. For a population, the square of the sum of the mortality-weighted benefits is equal to the square of the sum, for all years in the experience study period, for all individuals in the population at the beginning of the year, of the product of-- (1) The probability of death of the individual using the mortality rate for the individual's age and gender from the standard mortality table determined under paragraph (d)(4)(iii) of this section; and (2) The benefit amount for the individual. (B) Expression as formula. The square of the sum of the mortality- weighted benefits for a population determined pursuant to paragraph (d)(3)(v)(A) of this section is equal to: [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR05OC17.002 Where E is equal to the number of years in the experience study period, t represents each year during the experience study period, x represents an individual in the population during year t, qxt is the mortality rate for that individual's age and gender for the calendar year in which t begins under the applicable standard mortality table determined under paragraph (d)(4)(iii) of this section, bxt is equal to the benefit amount for that individual for year t, and Nt is equal to the number of individuals in the population in year t. (4) Development of mortality rates--(i) In general. The mortality rates under the base substitute mortality tables must be amounts- weighted mortality rates that are derived from the experience study. Except as provided in paragraph (d)(4)(iv) of this section, the mortality rate for an age and gender is determined by multiplying the mortality rate for that age and gender from the standard mortality table determined under paragraph (d)(4)(iii) of this section by the mortality ratio determined under paragraph (d)(4)(ii) of this section. If the simplified rule of paragraph (c)(2)(ii)(B) of this section is used for the population, then the mortality ratio is determined only taking into account people who are at least 50 years old and less than 100 years old, but the mortality ratio is applied to all ages. (ii) Mortality ratio--(A) In general. Except as provided in paragraph (d)(6) of this section, a mortality ratio is determined for a gender or other population within a gender, and is equal to the quotient determined by dividing-- (1) The sum, for all years in the experience study period, of the benefit amount for all individuals in the population at the beginning of the year who died during the year, by (2) The sum, for all years in the experience study period, for all individuals in the population at the beginning of the year (adjusted, as appropriate, for individuals who leave on account of reason other than death), of the product of-- (i) The probability of death of the individual using the mortality rate for the individual's age and gender from the standard mortality table determined under paragraph (d)(4)(iii) of this section; and (ii) The benefit amount for the individual. (B) Expression as formula. For purposes of determining a mortality ratio as described in paragraph (d)(4)(ii)(A) of this section, the amount described in paragraph (d)(4)(ii)(A)(2) of this section is equal to: [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR05OC17.003 Where E is equal to the number of years in the experience study period, t represents each year during the experience study period, x represents an individual in the population during year t, qxt is the mortality rate for that individual's age and gender for the calendar year in which t begins under the applicable standard mortality table determined under paragraph (d)(4)(iii) of this section, bxt is equal to the benefit amount for that individual for year t, and Nt is equal to the number of individuals in the population in year t. (iii) Standard mortality table--(A) Projection of base table. The standard mortality table for a year is the mortality table determined by applying cumulative mortality improvement factors determined under Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1(a)(2)(i)(E) to the base mortality table under Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1(d) for the period beginning with 2006 and ending in the base year for the base substitute mortality table determined under paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section. For purposes of the previous sentence, the cumulative mortality improvement factors are determined using the mortality improvement rates described in Sec. 1.430(h)(3)- 1(a)(2)(i)(C) that apply for the calendar year during which the plan sponsor submits the request for approval to use substitute mortality tables. If the plan sponsor submits such a request during 2017, then the cumulative mortality improvement factors are determined using the mortality improvement rates contained in the Mortality Improvement Scale MP-2016 Report (issued by the Retirement Plans Experience Committee (RPEC) of the Society of Actuaries and available at www.soa.org/Research/Experience-Study/Pension/research-2016-mp.aspx). (B) Selection of base table. If the population consists solely of annuitants, the annuitant base mortality table set forth in Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1(d) must be used for purposes of paragraph (d)(4)(iii)(A) of this section. If the population consists solely of nonannuitants, the nonannuitant base mortality table set forth in Sec. 1.430(h)(3)- 1(d) must be used for that purpose. If the population includes both annuitants and nonannuitants, a combination of the annuitant and nonannuitant base tables set forth in Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1(d) must be used for that purpose. The combined table is constructed using the weighting factors for small plans that are set forth in Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1(d). The weighting factors are applied to develop the combined table using the following equation: Combined mortality rate = [nonannuitant rate * (1 - weighting [[Page 46409]] factor)] + [annuitant rate * weighting factor]. (iv) Modification for ages 96 and older. Mortality rates for ages 96 and older under the base substitute mortality table are determined using the rules of paragraph (d)(4)(i) of this section but substituting a modified mortality ratio for the mortality ratio determined under paragraph (d)(4)(ii) of this section. The modified mortality ratio is determined as follows-- (A) For ages 96 through 109, if the mortality ratio is greater than 1.0, the modified mortality ratio is equal to the mortality ratio for the population reduced by 1/15th of the excess of the mortality ratio over 1.0 for each year that the age exceeds 95. (B) For ages 96 through 109, if the mortality ratio is less than 1.0, the modified mortality ratio is equal to the mortality ratio for the population increased by 1/15th of the excess of 1.0 over the mortality ratio for each year that the age exceeds 95. (C) For ages 110 and older, the modified mortality ratio is equal to 1.0. (v) Change in number of individuals covered by table. Experience data may not be used to develop a base table if the number of individuals in the population covered by the table (for example, the male annuitant population) as of the last day of the plan year before the year the request for approval to use the substitute mortality table is made is less than 80 percent or more than 120 percent of the average number of individuals in that population over the years covered by the experience study on which the substitute mortality tables are based, unless it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the experience data is accurately predictive of future mortality of that population (taking into account the effect of the change in individuals) after appropriate adjustments to the data are made (for example, excluding data from individuals with respect to a spun-off portion of the plan). For this purpose, a reasonable estimate of the number of individuals in the population covered by the table may be used. (5) Separate tables for specified populations--(i) In general. Except as provided in this paragraph (d)(5), separate substitute mortality tables are permitted to be used for separate populations within a gender only if-- (A) All individuals of that gender are divided into separate populations; (B) Each separate population has mortality experience that has full credibility as determined under the rules of paragraph (d)(5)(iii) of this section; and (C) The separate base substitute mortality table for each separate population is developed applying the rules of paragraphs (d)(1) through (4) of this section using an experience study that takes into account solely members of that population. (ii) Annuitant and nonannuitant separate populations. Notwithstanding paragraph (d)(5)(i)(B) of this section, a gender may be separated into separate populations of annuitants and nonannuitants for the purpose of developing and using substitute mortality tables, even if only one of those separate populations has credible mortality information. Similarly, if separate populations that satisfy paragraph (d)(5)(i)(B) of this section are established, then any of those populations may be further subdivided into separate annuitant and nonannuitant subpopulations, provided that at least one of the two resulting subpopulations has credible mortality information. The standard mortality tables under Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1 are used for a resulting subpopulation that does not have credible mortality information. For example, if the male hourly and salaried populations under a plan each have mortality experience with full credibility and the male salaried annuitant population has credible mortality information, then substitute mortality tables may be used for the plan with respect to the male salaried annuitant population even if the standard mortality tables under Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1 are used with respect to the male salaried nonannuitant population (because that nonannuitant population does not have credible mortality information). (iii) Credible mortality information for separate populations. In determining whether the mortality experience for a separate population within a gender has full credibility, the rules of paragraph (d)(1) of this section must be applied to that separate population. In demonstrating that an annuitant (or nonannuitant) population within a gender or within a separate population does not have credible mortality information, the rules of paragraph (c)(2)(iii)(B) of this section are applied by substituting the annuitant (or nonannuitant) population for the gender. (6) Option to determine a single mortality ratio for both genders. Base substitute mortality tables for a plan may be constructed by developing and applying a single mortality ratio for both genders, but only if the substitute mortality tables used for all plans maintained by members of the plan sponsor's controlled group (except for plans for which both the male and female populations, considered separately, have mortality experience with full credibility) are constructed in this manner. If the option under this paragraph (d)(6) is applied for a plan then, for all plans maintained by members of the plan sponsor's controlled group, whether both the male and female populations within the plan have credible mortality information (and, if that combined population's mortality experience does not have full credibility, the partial credibility weighting factor for the plan) is determined using the combined mortality experience for both genders. (e) Partial credibility--(1) In general. The mortality experience with respect to a population has partial credibility if the actual number of deaths for that population during the experience study period described in paragraph (d)(2) of this section is at least equal to 100 and is less than the full credibility threshold described for the population in paragraph (d)(3) of this section. If the mortality experience for the population has partial credibility, then in lieu of creating a base substitute mortality table as described in paragraph (d) of this section, the base substitute mortality table is created as the sum of-- (i) The product of-- (A) The partial credibility weighting factor determined under paragraph (e)(2) of this section; and (B) The mortality rates that are derived from the experience study determined under paragraph (d)(4)(i) of this section, and (ii) The product of-- (A) One minus the partial credibility weighting factor described in paragraph (e)(2) of this section; and (B) The mortality rate from the standard mortality tables described in paragraph (d)(4)(iii) of this section. (2) Partial credibility weighting factor. The partial credibility weighting factor is equal to the square root of the fraction-- (i) The numerator of which is the actual number of deaths for the population during the experience study period, and (ii) The denominator of which is the full credibility threshold for the population described in paragraph (d)(3) of this section. (f) Special rules for newly-affiliated plans--(1) In general. This paragraph (f) provides special rules that provide temporary relief from certain rules in this section in the case of a controlled group that includes a newly-affiliated plan (as defined in paragraph (f)(2) of this section). Paragraph (f)(3) of this section provides a transition period [[Page 46410]] during which the requirement in paragraph (c)(1) of this section (that is, the requirement that all plans within the controlled group that have credible mortality information must use substitute mortality tables) is not applicable. Paragraph (f)(4) of this section provides special rules that permit the use of a shorter experience study period in the case of a newly-affiliated plan that excludes the mortality experience data for the period before the date the plan becomes a newly-affiliated plan. (2) Definition of newly-affiliated plan. For purposes of this paragraph (f), a plan is a newly-affiliated plan if the plan sponsor becomes a member of the new controlled group in connection with a merger, acquisition, or similar transaction described in Sec. 1.410(b)-2(f). A plan also is treated as a newly-affiliated plan for purposes of this section if the plan is established in connection with a transfer of assets and liabilities from another employer's plan in connection with a merger, acquisition, or similar transaction described in Sec. 1.410(b)-2(f). (3) Transition period for newly-affiliated plans. The use of substitute mortality tables for a plan within a controlled group is not prohibited merely because, during the transition period, substitute mortality tables are not used for a newly-affiliated plan that fails to demonstrate a lack of credible mortality information during that period. Similarly, during the transition period, the use of substitute mortality tables for a newly-affiliated plan is not prohibited merely because substitute mortality tables are not used for another plan within the controlled group that fails to demonstrate a lack of credible mortality information during that period. The transition period begins on the date of the transaction that results in the plan becoming a newly-affiliated plan and ends on the last day of the plan year that immediately follows the latest ending period described in section 410(b)(6)(C)(ii) with respect to that transaction for any of the plans in the controlled group. (4) Experience study period for newly-affiliated plan--(i) In general. The mortality experience data for a newly-affiliated plan may either include or exclude mortality experience data for the period before the date the plan becomes a newly-affiliated plan. If a plan sponsor excludes mortality experience data for the period before the date the plan becomes a newly-affiliated plan, the exclusion must apply for all populations within the plan. (ii) Demonstration relating to lack of credible mortality information. If the experience study for a newly-affiliated plan excludes mortality experience data for the period prior to the date the plan becomes a newly-affiliated plan, then the demonstration that the plan does not have credible mortality information for a plan year that begins after the transition period can be made using a shorter experience study period than would otherwise be permitted under paragraph (c)(2)(iii)(B) of this section, provided that the experience study period begins with the date the plan becomes a newly-affiliated plan and ends not more than one year and one day before the first day of the plan year. (iii) Demonstration relating to credible mortality information. If the experience study for a newly-affiliated plan excludes mortality experience data for the period before the date the plan becomes a newly-affiliated plan and the plan fails to demonstrate that it does not have credible mortality information for the plan year under the rules of paragraph (f)(4)(ii) of this section, then other plans within the controlled group may continue to use substitute mortality tables only if substitute mortality tables are used for the newly-affiliated plan for the plan year. In such a case, the experience study period for the newly-affiliated plan may consist of a 12-month period. (g) Effective/applicability date--(1) General rule. This section applies for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2018. Except as provided in paragraph (g)(2) of this section, the substitute mortality table used for a plan for such a plan year must comply with the rules of paragraphs (a) through (f) of this section. (2) Transition rule for previously approved substitute mortality tables--(i) Applicability for 2018. If a plan sponsor has received approval from the Commissioner to use substitute mortality tables for a plan year beginning in 2017, then that previous approval applies to a plan year beginning in 2018 provided that-- (A) The previous approval period had not ended; (B) Substitute mortality tables are used for all plans in the plan sponsor's controlled group in accordance with the terms of that approval; and (C) The projection factors provided in Projection Scale AA, as set forth in Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1(d) as in effect on December 31, 2017 (as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2017) are applied to the base substitute mortality table. (ii) Applicability for later plan years. If a plan sponsor is described in paragraph (g)(2)(i) of this section, then that previous approval applies to a later plan year provided that-- (A) The previous approval period had not ended; (B) Substitute mortality tables are used for all plans in the plan sponsor's controlled group that have credible mortality information within the meaning of paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section; and (C) The mortality improvement factors described in paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section are applied to the base substitute mortality table. (3) Transition rule for requests for approval to use substitute mortality tables. A written request described in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section to use substitute mortality tables for a plan year that begins during 2018 does not fail to satisfy the timing requirement of paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section if it is submitted no later than February 28, 2018, provided that the plan sponsor agrees to a 90-day extension of the 180-day review period in accordance with paragraph (b)(2)(iv) of this section. 0 Par. 4. Section 1.431(c)(6)-1 is revised to read as follows: Sec. 1.431(c)(6)-1 Mortality tables used to determine current liability. (a) Mortality tables used to determine current liability. The mortality assumptions that apply to a defined benefit plan for the plan year pursuant to section 430(h)(3)(A) and Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1(a) are used to determine a multiemployer plan's current liability for purposes of applying the rules of section 431(c)(6). Either the generational mortality tables used pursuant to Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1(a)(2) or the static mortality tables used pursuant to Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1(a)(3) may be used for a multiemployer plan for this purpose. However, for this purpose, substitute mortality tables under Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-2 may not be used for a multiemployer plan. (b) Effective/applicability date. This section applies for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2018. For rules that apply to plan years beginning before January 1, 2018 and on or after January 1, 2008, see Sec. 1.431(c)(6)-1 (as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised April 1, 2015). 0 Par. 5. Section 1.433(h)(3)-1 is added to read as follows: Sec. 1.433(h)(3)-1 Mortality tables used to determine current liability. (a) Mortality tables used to determine current liability. In accordance with section 433(h)(3)(B), the mortality assumptions that apply to a defined benefit plan for the plan year pursuant to section 430(h)(3)(A) and [[Page 46411]] Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1(a) are used to determine a CSEC plan's current liability for purposes of applying the rules of section 433(c)(7)(C). Either the static mortality tables used pursuant to Sec. 1.430(h)(3)- 1(a)(3) or generational mortality tables used pursuant to Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1(a)(2) may be used for a CSEC plan for this purpose, but substitute mortality tables under Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-2 may not be used for this purpose. (b) Effective/applicability date. This section applies for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2018. Kirsten Wielobob, Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement. Approved: August 21, 2017. David Kautter, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy. [FR Doc. 2017-21485 Filed 10-3-17; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
![46388 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
AIRAC date State City Airport FDC No. FDC date Subject
12–Oct–17 .... MT Libby ........................ Libby ........................ 7/6820 8/22/17 This NOTAM, published in TL 17–21, is
hereby rescinded in its entirety.
12–Oct–17 .... AK Central ..................... Central ..................... 7/0453 8/29/17 RNAV (GPS) RWY 8, Orig-A.
12–Oct–17 .... AK Central ..................... Central ..................... 7/0454 8/29/17 RNAV (GPS) RWY 26, Orig-A.
12–Oct–17 .... AK Homer ...................... Homer ...................... 7/0473 8/29/17 RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 4, Amdt 1B.
12–Oct–17 .... AK Homer ...................... Homer ...................... 7/0475 8/29/17 LOC/DME RWY 4, Amdt 10A.
12–Oct–17 .... AK Koliganek ................. Koliganek ................. 7/0477 8/29/17 RNAV (GPS) RWY 27, Amdt 1.
12–Oct–17 .... AK Kaltag ...................... Kaltag ...................... 7/0478 8/29/17 RNAV (GPS) RWY 3, Orig-C.
12–Oct–17 .... AK Mountain Village ...... Mountain Village ...... 7/0479 8/29/17 RNAV (GPS) RWY 20, Amdt 1B.
12–Oct–17 .... AK Pilot Point ................ Pilot Point ................ 7/0480 8/29/17 RNAV (GPS) RWY 25, Orig-B.
12–Oct–17 .... AK Pilot Point ................ Pilot Point ................ 7/0482 8/29/17 RNAV (GPS) RWY 7, Orig-B.
12–Oct–17 .... AK Ruby ........................ Ruby ........................ 7/0492 8/29/17 RNAV (GPS) RWY 3, Amdt 1A.
12–Oct–17 .... CA Bishop ...................... Bishop ...................... 7/0499 8/29/17 RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 12, Orig-B.
12–Oct–17 .... CA Bishop ...................... Bishop ...................... 7/0500 8/29/17 RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 12, Orig-C.
12–Oct–17 .... CA Davis ........................ University ................. 7/0503 8/29/17 RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Orig-B.
12–Oct–17 .... CA Bakersfield ............... Bakersfield Muni ...... 7/0506 8/29/17 RNAV (GPS) RWY 34, Orig-B.
12–Oct–17 .... CA San Diego/El Cajon Gillespie Field .......... 7/0509 8/29/17 RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 2D.
12–Oct–17 .... CO Meeker ..................... Meeker Coulter Fld .. 7/0513 8/29/17 RNAV (GPS) RWY 3, Amdt 3B.
12–Oct–17 .... OR Bend ........................ Bend Muni ............... 7/0515 8/29/17 RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 16, Amdt 2A.
12–Oct–17 .... OR Mc Minnville ............. Mc Minnville Muni .... 7/0517 8/29/17 RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Orig-A.
12–Oct–17 .... OR Tillamook ................. Tillamook ................. 7/0519 8/29/17 RNAV (GPS) RWY 13, Orig-B.
12–Oct–17 .... OK Goldsby ................... David Jay Perry ....... 7/1922 8/14/17 VOR/DME RWY 31, Amdt 2.
12–Oct–17 .... GA Dalton ...................... Dalton Muni ............. 7/3954 8/22/17 ILS OR LOC RWY 14, Amdt 1.
12–Oct–17 .... MT Libby ........................ Libby ........................ 7/3967 8/22/17 GPS–A, Orig-C.
12–Oct–17 .... WA Seattle ..................... Boeing Field/King 7/4152 8/22/17 ILS OR LOC RWY 31L, Amdt 1B.
County Intl.
[FR Doc. 2017–21222 Filed 10–4–17; 8:45 am] mortality tables specific to the plan for defines the minimum required
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P minimum funding purposes (instead of contribution for a plan year by reference
using the generally applicable mortality to the plan’s funding target for the plan
tables). These regulations affect year. Under section 430(d)(1), a plan’s
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY participants in, beneficiaries of, funding target for a plan year generally
employers maintaining, and is the present value of all benefits
Internal Revenue Service administrators of certain retirement accrued or earned under the plan as of
plans. the first day of that plan year.
26 CFR Part 1 Section 430(h)(3) contains rules
DATES:
Effective date: These regulations are regarding the mortality tables to be used
[TD9826] under section 430. Under section
effective on October 5, 2017.
RIN 1545–BM71 Applicability date: These regulations 430(h)(3)(A), except as provided in
apply to plan years beginning on or after section 430(h)(3)(C) or (D), the Secretary
Mortality Tables for Determining January 1, 2018. is to prescribe by regulation mortality
Present Value Under Defined Benefit tables to be used in determining any
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pension Plans present value or making any
Concerning the regulations, Arslan
computation under section 430. Those
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Malik at (202) 317–6700; concerning the mortality tables must be based on the
Treasury. construction of the base mortality tables actual mortality experience of pension
ACTION: Final regulations.
and the static mortality tables for 2018, plan participants and projected trends
Michael Spaid at (206) 946–3480. in that experience. In prescribing those
SUMMARY: This document contains final SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: mortality tables, the Secretary is
regulations prescribing mortality tables required to take into account results of
Background
to be used by most defined benefit available independent studies of
pension plans. The tables specify the A. Generally Applicable Mortality mortality of individuals covered by
probability of survival year-by-year for Tables pension plans.2 Under section
an individual based on age, gender, and Section 412 of the Internal Revenue
other factors. This information is used Code (Code) prescribes minimum section 430 of the Code. Under section 101 of
(together with other actuarial funding requirements for defined Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978 (43 FR 47713)
assumptions) to calculate the present and section 302 of ERISA, the Secretary of the
benefit pension plans. Section 430 Treasury has interpretive jurisdiction over the
value of a stream of expected future specifies the minimum funding subject matter addressed in these regulations for
benefit payments for purposes of requirements that apply generally to purposes of ERISA, as well as the Code. Thus, these
determining the minimum funding defined benefit plans that are not Treasury regulations issued under section 430 of
requirements for a defined benefit plan. the Code also apply for purposes of section 303 of
multiemployer plans.1 Section 430(a) ERISA.
These mortality tables are also relevant
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
2 The standards prescribed for developing these
in determining the minimum required 1 Section 302 of the Employee Retirement Income mortality tables are the same as the standards that
amount of a lump-sum distribution from Security Act of 1974, Public Law 93–406, as are prescribed for developing mortality tables for
such a plan. In addition, this document amended (ERISA), sets forth funding rules that are multiemployer plans under section
parallel to those in section 412 of the Code, and 431(c)(6)(D)(iv)(II) (which are used to determine
contains final regulations updating the section 303 of ERISA sets forth additional funding current liability as part of the calculation of the
requirements that a plan sponsor must rules for defined benefit plans (other than minimum full funding limitation under section
meet to obtain IRS approval to use multiemployer plans) that are parallel to those in 431(c)(6)(B)). These standards also apply for
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:56 Oct 04, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM 05OCR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_46580/page/1.svg)
![46390 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
tables meet the statutory standards and mortality tables are used for the gender construction for base substitute
approves the request, the substitute that does not have credible mortality mortality tables. Under section 11 of
mortality tables are used to determine experience. Rev. Proc. 2008–62, a base table for a
present values and make computations Under the 2008 substitute mortality population may be created from the
under section 430 during the period of table regulations, there is credible unadjusted base table for the population
consecutive plan years (not to exceed mortality experience with respect to a through the application of a graduation
10) specified in the request. Under the gender if and only if, over the period method generally used by the actuarial
statute, a substitute mortality table may covered by the experience study, there profession in the United States.6 Section
be used for a plan, only if: (1) The plan are at least 1,000 deaths of individuals 12 of Rev. Proc. 2008–62 provides for an
has a sufficient number of plan of that gender.5 For this purpose, the alternative method of constructing a
participants and has been maintained minimum length of the experience base table through the application of a
for a sufficient period of time to have study period is 2 years and the fixed percentage to the mortality rates of
credible mortality information necessary maximum length of the experience a standard mortality table, projected to
to create a substitute mortality table; study period generally is 5 years. the base year.
and (2) the table reflects the actual Furthermore, the last day of the final Section 503 of the Bipartisan Budget
mortality experience of the plan’s year reflected in the experience data Act of 2015, Public Law 114–74 (129
participants and projected trends in must be less than three years before the Stat. 584 (2015)), which was enacted
general mortality experience. Except as first day of the first plan year for which November 2, 2015, provides for changes
provided by the Secretary, a plan the substitute mortality tables are to to the rules on the use of substitute
sponsor may not use substitute apply. mortality tables. Under that section,
mortality tables for any plan unless Under the 2008 substitute mortality ‘‘the determination of whether plans
substitute mortality tables are table regulations, development of have credible information shall be made
established and used for each plan substitute mortality tables for a plan in accordance with established actuarial
maintained by the plan sponsor or a requires creation of a base table and credibility theory, which (1) is
member of its controlled group. identification of a base year, which are materially different from the rules under
The 2008 substitute mortality table then used to determine the substitute [section 430(h)(3)(C)], including
regulations provide for review by the mortality tables. The base table must be Revenue Procedure 2007–37,7 that are
Commissioner of a plan sponsor’s developed from a study of the mortality in effect on [November 2, 2015]; and (2)
request for approval to use substitute experience of the plan using amounts- permits the use of tables that reflect
mortality tables. Under those weighted data. Under those regulations, adjustments to the tables described in
regulations, to use substitute mortality a plan’s substitute mortality tables must [section 430(h)(3)(A) and (B)]’’ if those
tables with respect to a plan, a plan be generational mortality tables that are adjustments are based on the actual
sponsor must submit a written request determined using the base mortality experience of the pension plan
to the Commissioner that demonstrates tables developed from the experience maintained by the plan sponsor.
that those substitute mortality tables study and the Scale AA Projection Proposed regulations regarding
comply with applicable requirements. A Factors (that is, using the same basis for revisions to mortality tables under
request for approval to use substitute mortality improvement that is used section 430(h)(3) (REG–112324–15)
mortality tables must specify the first under 2008 general mortality table were published in the Federal Register
plan year and the term of years for regulations). on December 29, 2016 (81 FR 95911).
which the tables are requested to be Under the 2008 substitute mortality The proposed regulations contain
used. table regulations, the use of substitute revisions to the generally applicable
Substitute mortality tables may not be mortality tables is terminated early in mortality tables (based on the RP–2014
used for a plan year unless the plan certain circumstances, including Mortality Tables Report), as well as new
sponsor submits the request at least 7 pursuant to a replacement of the rules regarding substitute mortality
months before the first day of the first tables that reflect section 503 of the
generally applicable mortality tables.
plan year for which the substitute Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015.
The early termination pursuant to such
mortality tables are to apply. The Comments were received on the
a replacement must be effective as of a
Commissioner has 180 days to review a proposed regulations, and a public
date specified in guidance published in
request for approval to use substitute hearing was held on April 13, 2017.
the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
mortality tables. If the Commissioner After consideration of the comments,
Rev. Proc. 2008–62 (2008–2 C.B. I.R.B.
does not deny the request within this the proposed regulations are adopted by
935) sets forth the procedure by which
180-day period, the request is deemed to this Treasury decision subject to certain
a plan sponsor of a defined benefit plan
have been approved unless the changes, the most significant of which
may request and obtain approval to use
Commissioner and the plan sponsor are described in this preamble under the
plan-specific substitute mortality tables
have agreed to extend that period. heading Explanation of Provisions.
Under the 2008 substitute mortality in accordance with section 430(h)(3)(C).
table regulations, substitute mortality The revenue procedure specifies the Explanation of Provisions
tables for a plan must be established information that must be provided in a
request for approval to use substitute I. Overview
separately for each gender, and a
mortality tables and specifies two These final regulations revise the
substitute mortality table may be
alternative acceptable methods of methodology for developing the
established for a gender only if there is
credible mortality experience with 5 The 1,000-death threshold for credible mortality 6 The revenue procedure identifies the Whittaker-
respect to that gender. If the mortality
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
experience under the regulations was intended to Henderson Type B graduation method or the Karup-
experience for one gender is credible provide a high degree of confidence that the plan’s King graduation method as acceptable methods.
but the mortality experience for the past mortality experience will be predictive of its 7 Rev. Proc. 2007–37, 2007–1 CB 1433, was not
other gender is not credible, the future mortality, and is consistent with relevant in effect on November 2, 2015. It was issued in 2007
actuarial literature (see, for example, Thomas N. in conjunction with proposed regulations regarding
substitute mortality tables are used for Herzog, Introduction to Credibility Theory (1999); substitute mortality tables (REG–143601–06, 72 FR
the gender that has credible mortality Stuart A. Klugman, et. al., Loss Models: From Data 29456) and was replaced by Rev. Proc. 2008–62
experience, and the generally applicable to Decisions (2004)). when those regulations were finalized in 2008.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:56 Oct 04, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM 05OCR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_46580/page/3.svg)
![46400 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
commencement. For purposes of this tables that apply the same mortality (ii) Projection period for static
section, an annuitant means a plan rates to both annuitants and mortality tables—(A) In general. The
participant who has commenced nonannuitants are permitted to be used projection period is 8 years for males
receiving benefits, and a nonannuitant for a small plan. For this purpose, a and 9 years for females, as adjusted
means a plan participant who has not small plan is defined as a plan with 500 based on age as provided in paragraph
yet commenced receiving benefits (for or fewer total participants (including (c)(3)(ii)(B) of this section.
example, an active employee or a both active and inactive participants (B) Age adjustment. For ages below
terminated vested participant). A and beneficiaries of deceased 80, the projection period is increased by
participant whose benefit has partially participants) on the valuation date. The 1 year for each year below age 80. For
commenced is treated as an annuitant combined static tables that are ages above 80, the projection period is
with respect to the portion of the benefit permitted to be used for small plans reduced (but not below zero) by 1⁄3 year
that has commenced and treated as a pursuant to this paragraph (b)(2) are for each year above 80.
nonannuitant with respect to the constructed from the separate
nonannuitant and annuitant static (iii) Fractional projection periods. If
balance of the benefit. In addition, with
mortality tables using the weighting for an age the number of years in the
respect to a beneficiary of a participant,
factors for small plans that are set forth projection period determined under this
the annuitant mortality table applies for
in paragraph (d) of this section. The paragraph (c)(3) is not a whole number,
the period beginning with each assumed
weighting factors are applied to develop then the mortality rate for that age is
commencement of benefits for the
these combined static tables using the determined by using linear interpolation
participant. If the participant has died
following equation: Combined mortality between—
(or to the extent the participant is
assumed to die before commencing rate = [nonannuitant rate * (1 ¥ (A) The mortality rate for that age that
benefits), the annuitant mortality table weighting factor)] + [annuitant rate * would be determined under paragraph
applies with respect to the beneficiary weighting factor]. (c)(3)(i) of this section if the number of
for the period beginning with each (c) Static tables—(1) Source of rates. years in the projection period were the
assumed commencement of benefits for The static mortality tables that are used next lower whole number; and
the beneficiary. pursuant to paragraph (a)(3) of this (B) The mortality rate for that age that
(ii) Examples of calculation using section are determined using the base would be determined under paragraph
separate annuitant and nonannuitant mortality tables described in paragraph (c)(3)(i) of this section if the number of
tables. With respect to a 45-year-old (a)(2)(i)(B) of this section taking into years in the projection period were the
active participant who is projected to account the mortality improvement next higher whole number.
commence receiving an annuity at age rates described in paragraph (a)(2)(i)(C)
of this section, in accordance with the (iv) Example. The following example
55, the funding target is determined illustrates how the mortality rates in the
using the nonannuitant mortality table rules of paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
(2) Selection of static tables. The static mortality tables issued under the
for the period before the participant provisions of this paragraph (c) are
static mortality tables that are used for
attains age 55 (so that, if the static calculated:
a valuation date are the static mortality
mortality tables are used pursuant to tables for the calendar year that contains Example. At age 85, the projection period
paragraph (a)(3) of this section, the the valuation date. for a male is 61⁄3 years (8 years minus 1⁄3 year
probability of an active male participant (3) Projection of mortality for each of the 5 years above age 80). For a
living from age 45 to age 55 using the improvements—(i) General rule. Except valuation date in 2018, the mortality rate in
table that applies for a valuation date in as provided in paragraph (c)(3)(iii) of the static mortality table for an 85-year-old
2018 is 0.988857) and using the male is based on a projection of mortality
this section, the static mortality tables
annuitant mortality table for the period improvement for 61⁄3 years beyond 2018.
for a calendar year are determined by Under paragraph (c)(3)(iii) of this section, the
ages 55 and above. Similarly, for a 45- multiplying the applicable mortality
year-old terminated vested participant mortality rate for an 85-year-old male
rate for each age from the base mortality annuitant in the static mortality table for
who is projected to commence an tables by both— 2018 is 2⁄3 times the projected mortality rate
annuity at age 65, the funding target is (A) The cumulative mortality for a male annuitant that age in 2024 plus 1⁄3
determined using the nonannuitant improvement factor (determined under times the projected mortality rate for a male
mortality table for the period before the the rules of paragraph (a)(2) of this annuitant that age in 2025. Accordingly, the
participant attains age 65 and using the section) for the period from 2006 mortality rate for an 85-year-old male
annuitant mortality table for ages 65 and through that calendar year; and annuitant in the static mortality table for
above. (B) The cumulative mortality 2018 is 0.075196 (2⁄3 times the projected
(2) Small plan tables. If static improvement factor (determined under mortality rate for an 85-year old male
annuitant in 2024 (0.075447) plus 1⁄3 times
mortality tables are used pursuant to the rules of paragraph (a)(2) of this
the projected mortality rate for an 85-year old
paragraph (a)(3) of this section, as an section) for the period beginning in that male annuitant in 2025 (0.074693)).
alternative to the separate static tables calendar year and continuing beyond
specified for annuitants and that calendar year for the number of (d) Base mortality tables. The
nonannuitants pursuant to paragraph years in the projection period described following are the base mortality tables.
(b)(1) of this section, combined static in paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section. The base year for these tables is 2006.
Males Females
Age Weighting Weighting
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Non-annuitant Annuitant factor for small Non-annuitant Annuitant factor for small
plans plans
0 ............................................................... 0.008878 0.008878 0 0.007278 0.007278 0
1 ............................................................... 0.000515 0.000515 0 0.000451 0.000451 0
2 ............................................................... 0.000348 0.000348 0 0.000295 0.000295 0
3 ............................................................... 0.000289 0.000289 0 0.000220 0.000220 0
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:56 Oct 04, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM 05OCR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_46580/page/13.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 46409
factor)] + [annuitant rate * weighting (C) The separate base substitute plans for which both the male and
factor]. mortality table for each separate female populations, considered
(iv) Modification for ages 96 and population is developed applying the separately, have mortality experience
older. Mortality rates for ages 96 and rules of paragraphs (d)(1) through (4) of with full credibility) are constructed in
older under the base substitute mortality this section using an experience study this manner. If the option under this
table are determined using the rules of that takes into account solely members paragraph (d)(6) is applied for a plan
paragraph (d)(4)(i) of this section but of that population. then, for all plans maintained by
substituting a modified mortality ratio (ii) Annuitant and nonannuitant members of the plan sponsor’s
for the mortality ratio determined under separate populations. Notwithstanding controlled group, whether both the male
paragraph (d)(4)(ii) of this section. The paragraph (d)(5)(i)(B) of this section, a and female populations within the plan
modified mortality ratio is determined gender may be separated into separate have credible mortality information
as follows— populations of annuitants and (and, if that combined population’s
(A) For ages 96 through 109, if the nonannuitants for the purpose of mortality experience does not have full
mortality ratio is greater than 1.0, the developing and using substitute credibility, the partial credibility
modified mortality ratio is equal to the mortality tables, even if only one of weighting factor for the plan) is
mortality ratio for the population those separate populations has credible determined using the combined
reduced by 1/15th of the excess of the mortality information. Similarly, if mortality experience for both genders.
mortality ratio over 1.0 for each year separate populations that satisfy (e) Partial credibility—(1) In general.
that the age exceeds 95. paragraph (d)(5)(i)(B) of this section are The mortality experience with respect to
(B) For ages 96 through 109, if the established, then any of those a population has partial credibility if the
mortality ratio is less than 1.0, the populations may be further subdivided actual number of deaths for that
modified mortality ratio is equal to the into separate annuitant and population during the experience study
mortality ratio for the population nonannuitant subpopulations, provided period described in paragraph (d)(2) of
increased by 1/15th of the excess of 1.0 that at least one of the two resulting this section is at least equal to 100 and
over the mortality ratio for each year subpopulations has credible mortality is less than the full credibility threshold
that the age exceeds 95. information. The standard mortality described for the population in
tables under § 1.430(h)(3)–1 are used for paragraph (d)(3) of this section. If the
(C) For ages 110 and older, the
a resulting subpopulation that does not mortality experience for the population
modified mortality ratio is equal to 1.0.
have credible mortality information. For has partial credibility, then in lieu of
(v) Change in number of individuals
example, if the male hourly and salaried creating a base substitute mortality table
covered by table. Experience data may
populations under a plan each have as described in paragraph (d) of this
not be used to develop a base table if the
mortality experience with full section, the base substitute mortality
number of individuals in the population
credibility and the male salaried table is created as the sum of—
covered by the table (for example, the
annuitant population has credible (i) The product of—
male annuitant population) as of the last mortality information, then substitute
day of the plan year before the year the (A) The partial credibility weighting
mortality tables may be used for the factor determined under paragraph
request for approval to use the plan with respect to the male salaried
substitute mortality table is made is less (e)(2) of this section; and
annuitant population even if the (B) The mortality rates that are
than 80 percent or more than 120 standard mortality tables under derived from the experience study
percent of the average number of § 1.430(h)(3)–1 are used with respect to determined under paragraph (d)(4)(i) of
individuals in that population over the the male salaried nonannuitant this section, and
years covered by the experience study population (because that nonannuitant (ii) The product of—
on which the substitute mortality tables population does not have credible (A) One minus the partial credibility
are based, unless it is demonstrated to mortality information). weighting factor described in paragraph
the satisfaction of the Commissioner (iii) Credible mortality information for (e)(2) of this section; and
that the experience data is accurately separate populations. In determining (B) The mortality rate from the
predictive of future mortality of that whether the mortality experience for a standard mortality tables described in
population (taking into account the separate population within a gender has paragraph (d)(4)(iii) of this section.
effect of the change in individuals) after full credibility, the rules of paragraph (2) Partial credibility weighting factor.
appropriate adjustments to the data are (d)(1) of this section must be applied to The partial credibility weighting factor
made (for example, excluding data from that separate population. In is equal to the square root of the
individuals with respect to a spun-off demonstrating that an annuitant (or fraction—
portion of the plan). For this purpose, a nonannuitant) population within a (i) The numerator of which is the
reasonable estimate of the number of gender or within a separate population actual number of deaths for the
individuals in the population covered does not have credible mortality population during the experience study
by the table may be used. information, the rules of paragraph period, and
(5) Separate tables for specified (c)(2)(iii)(B) of this section are applied (ii) The denominator of which is the
populations—(i) In general. Except as by substituting the annuitant (or full credibility threshold for the
provided in this paragraph (d)(5), nonannuitant) population for the population described in paragraph (d)(3)
separate substitute mortality tables are gender. of this section.
permitted to be used for separate (6) Option to determine a single (f) Special rules for newly-affiliated
populations within a gender only if— mortality ratio for both genders. Base plans—(1) In general. This paragraph (f)
(A) All individuals of that gender are substitute mortality tables for a plan provides special rules that provide
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
divided into separate populations; may be constructed by developing and temporary relief from certain rules in
(B) Each separate population has applying a single mortality ratio for both this section in the case of a controlled
mortality experience that has full genders, but only if the substitute group that includes a newly-affiliated
credibility as determined under the mortality tables used for all plans plan (as defined in paragraph (f)(2) of
rules of paragraph (d)(5)(iii) of this maintained by members of the plan this section). Paragraph (f)(3) of this
section; and sponsor’s controlled group (except for section provides a transition period
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:56 Oct 04, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM 05OCR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_46580/page/22.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 46411
§ 1.430(h)(3)–1(a) are used to determine I. Stay of Effective Date the substance of the rule is known. In
a CSEC plan’s current liability for On January 23, 2017, MSHA addition, they acknowledged MSHA’s
purposes of applying the rules of section published a final rule in the Federal stated intent to provide compliance
433(c)(7)(C). Either the static mortality Register (82 FR 7680) amending the assistance to industry and specific
tables used pursuant to § 1.430(h)(3)– Agency’s standards for the examination training to inspectors prior to the
1(a)(3) or generational mortality tables of working places in metal and effective date. The commenters
used pursuant to § 1.430(h)(3)–1(a)(2) nonmetal (MNM) mines (January 2017 expressed concern that, for any
may be used for a CSEC plan for this final rule). The final rule was scheduled compliance assistance measures to have
purpose, but substitute mortality tables to become effective on May 23, 2017. On any meaning, it is necessary for the
under § 1.430(h)(3)–2 may not be used May 22, 2017, MSHA published a final exact terms of the final rule to be known
for this purpose. before the final rule’s effective date.
rule delaying the effective date to
(b) Effective/applicability date. This Then, after the period of compliance
October 2, 2017 (82 FR 23139). On
section applies for plan years beginning assistance from MSHA, mine operators
September 12, 2017, MSHA proposed to
on or after January 1, 2018. will be required to develop appropriate
further delay the effective date of the
compliance programs to comply with
Kirsten Wielobob, final rule from October 2, 2017 to March
the final rule. Given the uncertainty of
Deputy Commissioner for Services and 2, 2018 (82 FR 42765). The comment
the final rule’s provisions and the
Enforcement. period for the proposed delay of the
compliance assistance efforts to be
Approved: August 21, 2017. final rule’s effective date closed on
scheduled, the commenters believed
David Kautter, September 26, 2017.
that an appropriate effective date cannot
In the same issue of the Federal
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax be established.
Policy.
Register, MSHA reopened the Other commenters stated that the
rulemaking record and proposed to proposed delay to March 2, 2018, was
[FR Doc. 2017–21485 Filed 10–3–17; 4:15 pm]
amend the January 2017 final rule with arbitrary and does not increase the
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
regard to the timing of the working likelihood that MSHA will complete all
place examination and contents of the of the compliance assistance, outreach,
examination record (82 FR 42757). and training tasks in that timeframe, or
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR MSHA has scheduled four public that the MNM industry will be ready to
hearings from October 24, 2017, to comply on the new effective date. They
Mine Safety and Health Administration November 2, 2017, at various locations, recommended that MSHA establish an
to provide the members of the public an effective date that is six months after the
30 CFR Parts 56 and 57 opportunity to present their views on date on which any changes to the final
the limited changes being proposed. The Examinations rule are published in the
[Docket No. MSHA–2014–0030] comment period for the proposed Federal Register.
limited changes closes on November 13, MSHA agrees with commenters who
RIN 1219–AB87 2017. support an extension beyond the
Most commenters on the proposed proposed March 2, 2018 effective date
Examinations of Working Places in rule to delay the effective date of the so that the Agency will complete its
Metal and Nonmetal Mines final rule supported extending the date stated goals by the effective date of the
AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health beyond October 2, 2017. One final rule. To ensure compliance
Administration, Labor. commenter who supported extending readiness on that date, MSHA is
the effective date to March 2, 2018, developing compliance assistance
ACTION: Final rule; stay of effective date;
stated that the extension of time would materials to assist the industry. A stay
reinstatement of rules. offer additional time for MSHA to beyond the proposed March 2, 2018,
SUMMARY: The Mine Safety and Health provide stakeholders training and effective date will provide MSHA the
Administration is staying the effective compliance assistance, would further time and flexibility to make these
date of the Agency’s January 23, 2017, permit MSHA to address issues raised materials available to stakeholders and
final rule that amended standards for by stakeholders during quarterly post them on MSHA’s Web site
examination of working places in metal training calls and stakeholder meetings (www.msha.gov); hold informational
and nonmetal mines to June 2, 2018. and compliance assistance visits, and stakeholder meetings at various
MSHA also is reinstating the provisions would also provide MSHA more time to locations around the country; and focus
of the working place examinations train its inspectors to help ensure on compliance assistance visits in other
standards that were in effect as of consistency in MSHA enforcement. This areas of the country, as well as ensure
October 1, 2017. This stay and commenter also supported a further all issues at these meetings and visits
reinstatement offers additional time for delay of the effective date of the final are addressed. Additional time will also
MSHA to provide stakeholders training rule, should such be required, if the allow MSHA to train its inspectors to
and compliance assistance. Agency has yet to achieve its stated ensure consistent enforcement. MSHA
goals. will make the Agency’s inspector
DATES: As of October 5, 2017, 30 CFR
Many commenters stated that an training materials available to the
56.18002 and 57.18002 are stayed until extension beyond October 2, 2017 is mining community to assist miners and
June 2, 2018, and 30 CFR 56.18002T and necessary and appropriate and mine operators in effectively
57.18002T are added until June 2, 2018. recommended an indefinite suspension implementing the rule, thus enhancing
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: of the effective date. The commenters
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
the safety of miners.
Sheila A. McConnell, Director, Office of maintained that, since substantive Labor union commenters did not
Standards, Regulations, and Variances, changes to the January 2017 final rule support the proposed delay in the
MSHA, at mcconnell.sheila.a@dol.gov were proposed at the same time as the effective date, stating that a delay was
(email); 202–693–9440 (voice); or 202– proposed delay, it is imprudent to unnecessary and miners’ health and
693–9441 (facsimile). establish any effective date until an safety would be affected by an
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: amended final rule is promulgated and extension. Labor also stated that the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:56 Oct 04, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM 05OCR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_46580/page/24.svg)
Document Created: 2017-10-05 00:53:40
Document Modified: 2017-10-05 00:53:40
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final regulations. | |
| Dates | Effective date: These regulations are effective on October 5, 2017. | |
| Contact | Concerning the regulations, Arslan Malik at (202) 317-6700; concerning the construction of the base mortality tables and the static mortality tables for 2018, Michael Spaid at (206) 946-3480. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 46388 | |
| RIN Number | 1545-BM71 | |
| CFR Associated | Income Taxes and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR