82_FR_46617 82 FR 46425 - Regulations Issued Under Authority of the Export Apple Act and Export Grapes and Plums; Changes to Export Reporting Requirements; Withdrawal

82 FR 46425 - Regulations Issued Under Authority of the Export Apple Act and Export Grapes and Plums; Changes to Export Reporting Requirements; Withdrawal

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 192 (October 5, 2017)

Page Range46425-46426
FR Document2017-21183

This document withdraws a proposed rule to change the reporting of export certificate information under regulations issued pursuant to the Export Apple Act and the Export Grape and Plum Act. After reviewing and considering the comments received, the agency has decided not to proceed with this action.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46425-46426]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21183]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2017 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 46425]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Parts 33 and 35

[Doc. No. AMS-FV-14-0099; FV15-33/35-1]


Regulations Issued Under Authority of the Export Apple Act and 
Export Grapes and Plums; Changes to Export Reporting Requirements; 
Withdrawal

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document withdraws a proposed rule to change the 
reporting of export certificate information under regulations issued 
pursuant to the Export Apple Act and the Export Grape and Plum Act. 
After reviewing and considering the comments received, the agency has 
decided not to proceed with this action.

DATES: As of October 5, 2017, the proposed rule published on December 
5, 2016, at 81 FR 87486, is withdrawn.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shannon Ramirez, Compliance and 
Enforcement Specialist, or Vincent Fusaro, Compliance and Enforcement 
Branch Chief, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops 
Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or 
Email: [email protected] or [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This withdrawal is issued under the Export 
Apple Act (7 U.S.C. 581-590) and the Export Grape and Plum Act (7 
U.S.C. 591-599) (together hereinafter referred to as the ``Export Fruit 
Acts''). The Export Fruit Acts promote foreign trade of fruit grown in 
the United States by authorizing the implementation of regulations 
related to quality, container markings, and inspection requirements. 
These regulations are contained in 7 CFR part 33 (Regulations Issued 
under the Export Apple Act) and 7 CFR part 35 (Export Grapes and 
Plums).
    This action withdraws a proposed rule published in the Federal 
Register on December 5, 2016, (81 FR 87486) and reopened for further 
comment on January 23, 2017, (82 FR 7733) and February 23, 2017, (82 FR 
11413) on changes to the reporting of export certificate information 
under regulations issued under the Export Fruit Acts. Specifically, the 
proposed rule would have required shippers of apples and grapes 
exported from the United States that are subject to inspection to enter 
the certificate number from inspection certificates (i.e., Export Form 
Certificates) into the Automated Export System (AES). For apples 
shipped to Canada in bulk containers, which are exempt from inspection 
requirements, shippers would have been required to enter a special 
exemption code defined by the Department of Agriculture (USDA) in lieu 
of entering an Export Form Certificate number. Shippers would also have 
been required to maintain paper or electronic copies of the 
certificates and to provide copies of the certificates to the 
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) upon request. AMS is responsible 
for monitoring apple and grape export shipments, and these proposed 
regulatory changes would help ensure that these shipments comply with 
inspection and certification requirements.
    In addition, the proposed rule would have defined ``shipper'' and 
removed the requirement that carriers of exported apples and grapes 
retain certificates on file (because the requirement to retain the 
certificates would have shifted to shippers of exported apples and 
grapes). It would have also removed regulations that are no longer 
applicable to grape exports and would have added structure and language 
to clarify the regulations.
    Plums are not currently regulated under the Export Grape and Plum 
Act; therefore, this change would not have impacted shipments of plums 
exported from the United States.
    During the proposed rule's initial 30-day comment period (December 
5, 2016, through January 4, 2017), six comments were received. Two of 
those comments included requests to extend the comment period. To allow 
further public review of the proposed changes, USDA reopened the 
comment period for 60 days on January 23, 2017, and then further 
extended the comment period for an additional 30 days, through April 
24, 2017. Four comments were received during the reopened comment 
period. Two comments were also received on May 1, 2017, one week after 
the close of the comment period (these two comments, which were in 
letter form, were dated before the end of the comment period: March 22, 
2017, and April 10, 2017). All the comments may be viewed on the 
internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Of the twelve comments 
received, two requested an extension of the initial comment period (as 
noted above), five were in support, and five were opposed.
    In summary, the five supporting comments were generally brief and 
in favor of the proposed changes. The opposing comments detailed 
concerns about the impact of the proposed changes on shippers, 
specifically, and the export industry, generally. Some commenters noted 
that the changes would result in a substantive increase in burden and 
costs to shippers without adding quality benefits, stating that this 
could lead to reduced efficiency and vitality of export operations. One 
commenter indicated that requiring a shipper to maintain the export 
certificates on file would be a duplication of recordkeeping, because 
those same certificates are maintained for five years by the 
commenter's state agricultural department. Another commenter noted that 
the changes would represent a major barrier to trade because of the 
complicated logistics of ocean shipments of exported apples and could 
cause economic harm.
    Some commenters stated that the proposed rule did not contain 
quantifiable data that demonstrated non-compliance with the existing 
requirements, observing that shipments appear to have been properly 
inspected and certified for years without the proposed additional 
monitoring to ensure compliance with these requirements. One commenter 
questioned using a special USDA-defined code in AES for exempt bulk 
shipments of apples to Canada because it appears to be a temporary 
workaround that would be used only until a new harmonized tariff code 
could be developed to identify these exempt shipments; the commenter 
suggested delaying the change until a permanent solution was developed 
in light of the non-urgent nature of the change. Some commenters also 
raised issues about the

[[Page 46426]]

entry of information in AES, such as whether shipments bound for Canada 
require such entry and that it is a shipper's agent or freight 
forwarder--not a shipper--who enters data into AES. One commenter also 
recommended that the proposed ``shipper'' definition be more 
descriptive to provide further clarity in the regulations.
    Given the opposing comments received, AMS has determined that the 
proposed rule changing the reporting requirements under the Export 
Fruit Acts should not be finalized. AMS intends to conduct outreach 
with export industry stakeholders and consider other compliance 
monitoring activities as it reconsiders whether changes will be 
proposed in the future. Accordingly, the proposed rule to change the 
reporting of export certificate information under regulations issued 
pursuant to the Export Fruit Acts published in the Federal Register on 
December 5, 2016, (81 FR 87486) is hereby withdrawn.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 33

    Apples, Exports, Pears, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Authority: 48 Stat. 124; 7 U.S.C. 581-590.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 35

    Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Grapes, Plums, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Authority: 74 Stat. 734; 75 Stat. 220; 7 U.S.C. 591-599.

     Dated: September 28, 2017.
Bruce Summers,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-21183 Filed 10-4-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P



                                                                                                                                                                                                 46425

                                                 Proposed Rules                                                                                                Federal Register
                                                                                                                                                               Vol. 82, No. 192

                                                                                                                                                               Thursday, October 5, 2017



                                                 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER                       This action withdraws a proposed                   24, 2017. Four comments were received
                                                 contains notices to the public of the proposed          rule published in the Federal Register                during the reopened comment period.
                                                 issuance of rules and regulations. The                  on December 5, 2016, (81 FR 87486) and                Two comments were also received on
                                                 purpose of these notices is to give interested          reopened for further comment on                       May 1, 2017, one week after the close
                                                 persons an opportunity to participate in the            January 23, 2017, (82 FR 7733) and                    of the comment period (these two
                                                 rule making prior to the adoption of the final
                                                 rules.
                                                                                                         February 23, 2017, (82 FR 11413) on                   comments, which were in letter form,
                                                                                                         changes to the reporting of export                    were dated before the end of the
                                                                                                         certificate information under regulations             comment period: March 22, 2017, and
                                                 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE                               issued under the Export Fruit Acts.                   April 10, 2017). All the comments may
                                                                                                         Specifically, the proposed rule would                 be viewed on the internet at http://
                                                 Agricultural Marketing Service                          have required shippers of apples and                  www.regulations.gov. Of the twelve
                                                                                                         grapes exported from the United States                comments received, two requested an
                                                 7 CFR Parts 33 and 35                                   that are subject to inspection to enter               extension of the initial comment period
                                                                                                         the certificate number from inspection                (as noted above), five were in support,
                                                 [Doc. No. AMS–FV–14–0099; FV15–33/35–1]                 certificates (i.e., Export Form                       and five were opposed.
                                                                                                         Certificates) into the Automated Export                  In summary, the five supporting
                                                 Regulations Issued Under Authority of                   System (AES). For apples shipped to                   comments were generally brief and in
                                                 the Export Apple Act and Export                         Canada in bulk containers, which are                  favor of the proposed changes. The
                                                 Grapes and Plums; Changes to Export                     exempt from inspection requirements,                  opposing comments detailed concerns
                                                 Reporting Requirements; Withdrawal                      shippers would have been required to                  about the impact of the proposed
                                                                                                         enter a special exemption code defined                changes on shippers, specifically, and
                                                 AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,
                                                                                                         by the Department of Agriculture                      the export industry, generally. Some
                                                 USDA.
                                                                                                         (USDA) in lieu of entering an Export                  commenters noted that the changes
                                                 ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule.                    Form Certificate number. Shippers                     would result in a substantive increase in
                                                 SUMMARY:    This document withdraws a                   would also have been required to                      burden and costs to shippers without
                                                 proposed rule to change the reporting of                maintain paper or electronic copies of                adding quality benefits, stating that this
                                                 export certificate information under                    the certificates and to provide copies of             could lead to reduced efficiency and
                                                 regulations issued pursuant to the                      the certificates to the Agricultural                  vitality of export operations. One
                                                 Export Apple Act and the Export Grape                   Marketing Service (AMS) upon request.                 commenter indicated that requiring a
                                                 and Plum Act. After reviewing and                       AMS is responsible for monitoring                     shipper to maintain the export
                                                 considering the comments received, the                  apple and grape export shipments, and                 certificates on file would be a
                                                 agency has decided not to proceed with                  these proposed regulatory changes                     duplication of recordkeeping, because
                                                 this action.                                            would help ensure that these shipments                those same certificates are maintained
                                                                                                         comply with inspection and                            for five years by the commenter’s state
                                                 DATES: As of October 5, 2017, the
                                                                                                         certification requirements.                           agricultural department. Another
                                                 proposed rule published on December 5,                     In addition, the proposed rule would               commenter noted that the changes
                                                 2016, at 81 FR 87486, is withdrawn.                     have defined ‘‘shipper’’ and removed                  would represent a major barrier to trade
                                                 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        the requirement that carriers of exported             because of the complicated logistics of
                                                 Shannon Ramirez, Compliance and                         apples and grapes retain certificates on              ocean shipments of exported apples and
                                                 Enforcement Specialist, or Vincent                      file (because the requirement to retain               could cause economic harm.
                                                 Fusaro, Compliance and Enforcement                      the certificates would have shifted to                   Some commenters stated that the
                                                 Branch Chief, Marketing Order and                       shippers of exported apples and grapes).              proposed rule did not contain
                                                 Agreement Division, Specialty Crops                     It would have also removed regulations                quantifiable data that demonstrated
                                                 Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (202)                    that are no longer applicable to grape                non-compliance with the existing
                                                 720–2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or                       exports and would have added structure                requirements, observing that shipments
                                                 Email: Shannon.Ramirez@ams.usda.gov                     and language to clarify the regulations.              appear to have been properly inspected
                                                 or VincentJ.Fusaro@ams.usda.gov.                           Plums are not currently regulated                  and certified for years without the
                                                 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This                         under the Export Grape and Plum Act;                  proposed additional monitoring to
                                                 withdrawal is issued under the Export                   therefore, this change would not have                 ensure compliance with these
                                                 Apple Act (7 U.S.C. 581–590) and the                    impacted shipments of plums exported                  requirements. One commenter
                                                 Export Grape and Plum Act (7 U.S.C.                     from the United States.                               questioned using a special USDA-
                                                 591–599) (together hereinafter referred                    During the proposed rule’s initial 30-             defined code in AES for exempt bulk
                                                 to as the ‘‘Export Fruit Acts’’). The                   day comment period (December 5, 2016,                 shipments of apples to Canada because
                                                 Export Fruit Acts promote foreign trade                 through January 4, 2017), six comments                it appears to be a temporary workaround
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                 of fruit grown in the United States by                  were received. Two of those comments                  that would be used only until a new
                                                 authorizing the implementation of                       included requests to extend the                       harmonized tariff code could be
                                                 regulations related to quality, container               comment period. To allow further                      developed to identify these exempt
                                                 markings, and inspection requirements.                  public review of the proposed changes,                shipments; the commenter suggested
                                                 These regulations are contained in 7                    USDA reopened the comment period for                  delaying the change until a permanent
                                                 CFR part 33 (Regulations Issued under                   60 days on January 23, 2017, and then                 solution was developed in light of the
                                                 the Export Apple Act) and 7 CFR part                    further extended the comment period                   non-urgent nature of the change. Some
                                                 35 (Export Grapes and Plums).                           for an additional 30 days, through April              commenters also raised issues about the


                                            VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:29 Oct 04, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00001   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM   05OCP1


                                                 46426                 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2017 / Proposed Rules

                                                 entry of information in AES, such as                    at Fort Scott Municipal Airport, Fort                 Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
                                                 whether shipments bound for Canada                      Scott, KS, and Phillipsburg Municipal                 describes in more detail the scope of the
                                                 require such entry and that it is a                     Airport, Phillipsburg, KS. The FAA is                 agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
                                                 shipper’s agent or freight forwarder—                   proposing this action due to the                      promulgated under the authority
                                                 not a shipper—who enters data into                      decommissioning of the Fort Scott non-                described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
                                                 AES. One commenter also                                 directional beacon (NDB) and the                      Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
                                                 recommended that the proposed                           Phillipsburg NDB and the cancellation                 section, the FAA is charged with
                                                 ‘‘shipper’’ definition be more                          of the associated instrument approach                 prescribing regulations to assign the use
                                                 descriptive to provide further clarity in               procedures. This action would enhance                 of airspace necessary to ensure the
                                                 the regulations.                                        the safety and management of                          safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
                                                    Given the opposing comments                          instrument flight rules (IFR) operations              airspace. This regulation is within the
                                                 received, AMS has determined that the                   at these airports.                                    scope of that authority as it would
                                                 proposed rule changing the reporting                    DATES: Comments must be received on                   amend Class E airspace extending
                                                 requirements under the Export Fruit                     or before November 20, 2017.                          upward from 700 feet above the surface
                                                 Acts should not be finalized. AMS                       ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
                                                                                                                                                               at Fort Scott Municipal Airport, Fort
                                                 intends to conduct outreach with export                 proposal to the U.S. Department of                    Scott, KS, and Phillipsburg Municipal
                                                 industry stakeholders and consider                      Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200               Airport, Phillipsburg, KS, to support IFR
                                                 other compliance monitoring activities                  New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building                  operations at these airports.
                                                 as it reconsiders whether changes will                  Ground Floor, Room W12–140,                           Comments Invited
                                                 be proposed in the future. Accordingly,                 Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202)
                                                 the proposed rule to change the                                                                                  Interested parties are invited to
                                                                                                         366–9826, or (800) 647–5527. You must                 participate in this proposed rulemaking
                                                 reporting of export certificate                         identify FAA Docket No. FAA–2017–
                                                 information under regulations issued                                                                          by submitting such written data, views,
                                                                                                         0523; Airspace Docket No. 17–ACE–9 at                 or arguments, as they may desire.
                                                 pursuant to the Export Fruit Acts                       the beginning of your comments. You
                                                 published in the Federal Register on                                                                          Comments that provide the factual basis
                                                                                                         may also submit comments through the                  supporting the views and suggestions
                                                 December 5, 2016, (81 FR 87486) is                      Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
                                                 hereby withdrawn.                                                                                             presented are particularly helpful in
                                                                                                         You may review the public docket                      developing reasoned regulatory
                                                 List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 33                       containing the proposal, any comments                 decisions on the proposal. Comments
                                                                                                         received, and any final disposition in                are specifically invited on the overall
                                                   Apples, Exports, Pears, Reporting and
                                                                                                         person in the Dockets Office between                  regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
                                                 recordkeeping requirements.
                                                                                                         9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday                       environmental, and energy-related
                                                    Authority: 48 Stat. 124; 7 U.S.C. 581–590.           through Friday, except federal holidays.              aspects of the proposal.
                                                 List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 35                          FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace                       Communications should identify both
                                                                                                         Designations and Reporting Points, and                docket numbers and be submitted in
                                                   Administrative practice and                           subsequent amendments can be viewed
                                                 procedure, Exports, Grapes, Plums,                                                                            triplicate to the address listed above.
                                                                                                         online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/             Commenters wishing the FAA to
                                                 Reporting and recordkeeping                             publications/. For further information,
                                                 requirements.                                                                                                 acknowledge receipt of their comments
                                                                                                         you can contact the Airspace Policy                   on this notice must submit with those
                                                   Authority: 74 Stat. 734; 75 Stat. 220; 7              Group, Federal Aviation                               comments a self-addressed, stamped
                                                 U.S.C. 591–599.                                         Administration, 800 Independence                      postcard on which the following
                                                   Dated: September 28, 2017.                            Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;                     statement is made: ‘‘Comments to
                                                 Bruce Summers,                                          telephone: (202) 267–8783. The Order is               Docket No. FAA–2017–0523/Airspace
                                                                                                         also available for inspection at the                  Docket No. 17–ACE–9.’’ The postcard
                                                 Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
                                                 Service.                                                National Archives and Records                         will be date/time stamped and returned
                                                                                                         Administration (NARA). For                            to the commenter.
                                                 [FR Doc. 2017–21183 Filed 10–4–17; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                         information on the availability of FAA                   All communications received before
                                                 BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
                                                                                                         Order 7400.11B at NARA, call (202)                    the specified closing date for comments
                                                                                                         741–6030, or go to https://                           will be considered before taking action
                                                                                                         www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/                on the proposed rule. The proposal
                                                 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION                            ibr-locations.html.                                   contained in this notice may be changed
                                                                                                            FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace                        in light of the comments received. A
                                                 Federal Aviation Administration
                                                                                                         Designations and Reporting Points, is                 report summarizing each substantive
                                                                                                         published yearly and effective on                     public contact with FAA personnel
                                                 14 CFR Part 71
                                                                                                         September 15.                                         concerned with this rulemaking will be
                                                 [Docket No. FAA–2017–0523; Airspace                     FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                      filed in the docket.
                                                 Docket No. 17–ACE–9]                                    Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
                                                                                                         Administration, Operations Support                    Availability of NPRMs
                                                 Proposed Amendment of Class E                           Group, Central Service Center, 10101                    An electronic copy of this document
                                                 Airspace; Fort Scott, KS; and                           Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX                      may be downloaded through the
                                                 Phillipsburg, KS                                        76177; telephone (817) 222–5711.                      Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                 AGENCY: Federal Aviation                                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                            Recently published rulemaking
                                                 Administration (FAA), DOT.                                                                                    documents can also be accessed through
                                                                                                         Authority for This Rulemaking                         the FAA’s Web page at http://
                                                 ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
                                                 (NPRM).                                                   The FAA’s authority to issue rules                  www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/
                                                                                                         regarding aviation safety is found in                 airspace_amendments/.
                                                 SUMMARY: This action proposes to                        Title 49 of the United States Code.                     You may review the public docket
                                                 modify Class E airspace extending                       Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the                 containing the proposal, any comments
                                                 upward from 700 feet above the surface                  authority of the FAA Administrator.                   received, and any final disposition in


                                            VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:29 Oct 04, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00002   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\05OCP1.SGM   05OCP1



Document Created: 2017-10-05 00:53:17
Document Modified: 2017-10-05 00:53:17
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionWithdrawal of proposed rule.
DatesAs of October 5, 2017, the proposed rule published on December 5, 2016, at 81 FR 87486, is withdrawn.
ContactShannon Ramirez, Compliance and Enforcement Specialist, or Vincent Fusaro, Compliance and Enforcement Branch Chief, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: [email protected] or [email protected]
FR Citation82 FR 46425 
CFR Citation7 CFR 33
7 CFR 35
CFR AssociatedApples; Exports; Pears and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR