82 FR 46524 - Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Italy, Malaysia, and the Philippines; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 192 (October 5, 2017)

Page Range		46524-46525
FR Document		2017-21429

The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the Act'') to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on stainless steel butt-weld pipe fittings from Italy, Malaysia, and the Philippines would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46524-46525]
From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21429]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-865-867 (Third Review)]

Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Italy, Malaysia, and
the Philippines; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of
expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the Act'') to
determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on
stainless steel butt-weld pipe fittings from Italy, Malaysia, and the
Philippines would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time.

DATES: September 5, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Lawrence (202-205-3185),
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these
reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at
https://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.--On September 5, 2017, the Commission determined that
the domestic interested party group response to its notice of
institution (82 FR 25324, June 1, 2017) of the subject five-year
reviews was adequate and that the respondent interested party group
response was inadequate for all reviews. The Commission did not find
any other circumstances that would warrant conducting full reviews.\1\
Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct expedited
reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission's Web site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and
rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201),
and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
Staff report.--A staff report containing information concerning the
subject matter of the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on
November 2, 2017, and made available to persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for these reviews. A public version will
be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission's rules.
Written submissions.--As provided in section 207.62(d) of the
Commission's rules, interested parties that are parties to the reviews
and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of
institution,\2\ and any party other than an interested party to the
reviews may file written comments with the Secretary on what
determinations the Commission should reach in the

[[Page 46525]]

reviews. Comments are due on or before November 17, 2017 and may not
contain new factual information. Any person that is neither a party to
the five-year reviews nor an interested party may submit a brief
written statement (which shall not contain any new factual information)
pertinent to the reviews by November 17, 2017. However, should the
Department of Commerce extend the time limit for its completion of the
final results of its reviews, the deadline for comments (which may not
contain new factual information) on Commerce's final results is three
business days after the issuance of Commerce's results. If comments
contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with
the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the
Commission's rules. The Commission's rules with respect to filing were
revised effective July 25, 2014. See 79 FR 35920 (June 25, 2014), and
the revised Commission Handbook on E-filing, available from the
Commission's Web site at https://www.usitc.gov/secretary/documents/handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\2\ The Commission has found the responses submitted on behalf
of Core Pipe Products, Inc., Shaw Alloying Piping Products, LLC, and
Taylor Forge Stainless to be individually adequate. Comments from
other interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR
207.62(d)(2)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each
document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other
parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The
Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Determination.--The Commission has determined these reviews are
extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise
its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to
19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant
to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: September 29, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-21429 Filed 10-4-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

46524 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2017 / Notices

phase of these investigations beginning www.usitc.gov/secretary/documents/ information on this matter by contacting
at 9:30 a.m. on Wednesday, December 6, handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf, the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
2017, at the U.S. International Trade elaborates upon the Commission’s rules 205–1810. Persons with mobility
Commission Building. Requests to with respect to electronic filing. impairments who will need special
appear at the hearing should be filed in Additional written submissions to the assistance in gaining access to the
writing with the Secretary to the Commission, including requests Commission should contact the Office
Commission on or before December 1, pursuant to section 201.12 of the of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
2017. A nonparty who has testimony Commission’s rules, shall not be General information concerning the
that may aid the Commission’s accepted unless good cause is shown for Commission may also be obtained by
deliberations may request permission to accepting such submissions, or unless accessing its internet server (https://
present a short statement at the hearing. the submission is pursuant to a specific www.usitc.gov). The public record for
All parties and nonparties desiring to request by a Commissioner or these reviews may be viewed on the
appear at the hearing and make oral Commission staff. Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
presentations should participate in a In accordance with sections 201.16(c) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
prehearing conference to be held on and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
December 4, 2017, at the U.S. each document filed by a party to the Background.—On September 5, 2017,
International Trade Commission investigations must be served on all the Commission determined that the
Building, if deemed necessary. Oral other parties to the investigations (as domestic interested party group
testimony and written materials to be identified by either the public or BPI response to its notice of institution (82
submitted at the public hearing are service list), and a certificate of service FR 25324, June 1, 2017) of the subject
governed by sections 201.6(b)(2), must be timely filed. The Secretary will five-year reviews was adequate and that
201.13(f), and 207.24 of the not accept a document for filing without the respondent interested party group
Commission’s rules. Parties must submit a certificate of service. response was inadequate for all reviews.
any request to present a portion of their Authority: These investigations are The Commission did not find any other
hearing testimony in camera no later being conducted under authority of title circumstances that would warrant
than 7 business days prior to the date of VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly,
the hearing. is published pursuant to section 207.21 the Commission determined that it
Written submissions.—Each party of the Commission’s rules. would conduct expedited reviews
who is an interested party shall submit By order of the Commission. pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the
a prehearing brief to the Commission. Issued: September 29, 2017. Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).
Prehearing briefs must conform with the Lisa R. Barton, For further information concerning
provisions of section 207.23 of the Secretary to the Commission. the conduct of these reviews and rules
Commission’s rules; the deadline for [FR Doc. 2017–21428 Filed 10–4–17; 8:45 am] of general application, consult the
filing is November 29, 2017. Parties may BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
also file written testimony in connection Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B
with their presentation at the hearing, as (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
provided in section 207.24 of the INTERNATIONAL TRADE subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
Commission’s rules, and posthearing COMMISSION 207).
briefs, which must conform with the Staff report.—A staff report
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–865–867 (Third
provisions of section 207.25 of the containing information concerning the
Review)]
Commission’s rules. The deadline for subject matter of the reviews will be
filing posthearing briefs is December 12, Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings placed in the nonpublic record on
2017. In addition, any person who has From Italy, Malaysia, and the November 2, 2017, and made available
not entered an appearance as a party to Philippines; Scheduling of Expedited to persons on the Administrative
the investigations may submit a written Five-Year Reviews Protective Order service list for these
statement of information pertinent to reviews. A public version will be issued
the subject of the investigations, AGENCY: United States International thereafter, pursuant to section
including statements of support or Trade Commission. 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules.
opposition to the petition, on or before ACTION: Notice. Written submissions.—As provided in
December 12, 2017. On December 29, section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
2017, the Commission will make SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives rules, interested parties that are parties
available to parties all information on notice of the scheduling of expedited to the reviews and that have provided
which they have not had an opportunity reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of individually adequate responses to the
to comment. Parties may submit final 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether notice of institution,2 and any party
comments on this information on or revocation of the antidumping duty other than an interested party to the
before January 3, 2018, but such final orders on stainless steel butt-weld pipe reviews may file written comments with
comments must not contain new factual fittings from Italy, Malaysia, and the the Secretary on what determinations
information and must otherwise comply Philippines would be likely to lead to the Commission should reach in the
with section 207.30 of the Commission’s continuation or recurrence of material
rules. All written submissions must injury within a reasonably foreseeable 1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the

conform with the provisions of section time. Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

individual Commissioner’s statements will be
201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any DATES: September 5, 2017.
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
submissions that contain BPI must also FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commission’s Web site.
conform with the requirements of Amanda Lawrence (202–205–3185), 2 The Commission has found the responses

sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Office of Investigations, U.S. submitted on behalf of Core Pipe Products, Inc.,
Shaw Alloying Piping Products, LLC, and Taylor
Commission’s rules. The Commission’s International Trade Commission, 500 E Forge Stainless to be individually adequate.
Handbook on E-Filing, available on the Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Comments from other interested parties will not be
Commission’s Web site at https:// Hearing-impaired persons can obtain accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:52 Oct 04, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM 05OCN1

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2017 / Notices 46525

reviews. Comments are due on or before to Show Cause to Warren B. Dailey, either option. Id. (citing 21 CFR
November 17, 2017 and may not contain M.D. (Registrant), of Houston, Texas. 1301.43). The Order also notified
new factual information. Any person The Show Cause Order proposed the Registrant of his right to submit a
that is neither a party to the five-year revocation of Registrant’s DEA corrective action plan under 21 U.S.C.
reviews nor an interested party may Certificate of Registration, pursuant to 824(c)(2)(C). Id. at 3.
submit a brief written statement (which 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3) and (5), on two On February 7, 2017, the Show Cause
shall not contain any new factual grounds: (1) That he does not have Order was mailed to Registrant, via first
information) pertinent to the reviews by authority to handle controlled class mail, addressed to him at his
November 17, 2017. However, should substances in Texas, the State in which registered address at 2305 Southmore,
the Department of Commerce extend the he is registered with the Agency; and (2) Houston, Texas. GX 5. Affidavit of
time limit for its completion of the final he has been excluded from participation Service by DEA Analyst, Office of Chief
results of its reviews, the deadline for in a program pursuant to section 1320a– Counsel. Also, on February 21, 2016, a
comments (which may not contain new 7(a) of Title 42. GX 2 (Order to Show Diversion Investigator (DI) with the
factual information) on Commerce’s Cause), at 1. Houston Division Office emailed the
final results is three business days after With respect to the Agency’s Show Cause Order to an attorney, who
the issuance of Commerce’s results. If jurisdiction, the Show Cause Order represented Registrant in the state board
comments contain business proprietary alleged that Registrant is registered as a proceeding, who accepted service on his
information (BPI), they must conform practitioner in schedules II through V, behalf. GX 4. In his email, the attorney
with the requirements of sections 201.6, under Certificate of Registration No. represented that he was ‘‘accepting
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s AD9639038, at the registered address of service upon’’ Registrant. Id. (copy of
rules. The Commission’s rules with 2305 Southmore, Houston, Texas. Id. email between DI and attorney
respect to filing were revised effective The Order alleged that Registrant’s accepting service on Registrant.)
July 25, 2014. See 79 FR 35920 (June 25, registration expires by its terms on June On April 6, 2017 the Government
2014), and the revised Commission 30, 2018. Id. forwarded a Request for Final Agency
Handbook on E-filing, available from the As to the substantive grounds for the Action (RFAA) and an evidentiary
Commission’s Web site at https:// proceeding, the Show Cause Order record to my Office. On review, I found
www.usitc.gov/secretary/documents/ specifically alleged that ‘‘[o]n October the Government’s attempts at service
handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf. 12, 2016, the Texas Medical Board insufficient. As for the Government’s
In accordance with sections 201.16(c) issued an Order of Suspension by attempt to serve Registrant by mail
and 207.3 of the rules, each document Operation of Law, suspending addressed to his registered address, I
filed by a party to the reviews must be [Registrant’s] Texas Medical License found this inadequate because it clearly
. . . based on [his] felony conviction on knew that Registrant had been convicted
served on all other parties to the reviews
March 30, 2016 . . . for health care of multiple federal felony offenses more
(as identified by either the public or BPI
fraud.’’ Id. The Show Cause Order then than a year earlier and was likely
service list), and a certificate of service
alleged that Registrant is ‘‘currently incarcerated in a United States
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
without authority to practice medicine Penitentiary. See Robinson v.
not accept a document for filing without
or handle controlled substances in the Hanrahan, 409 U.S. 38, 40 (1972)
a certificate of service.
State of Texas, the [S]tate in which he (‘‘[T]he State knew that appellant was
Determination.—The Commission has
registered with’’ the Agency, thus not at the address to which the notice
determined these reviews are
subjecting his registration to revocation. was mailed . . . since he was at that
extraordinarily complicated and
Id. at (citing 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3); other very time confined in . . . jail. Under
therefore has determined to exercise its
citations omitted). these circumstances, it cannot be said
authority to extend the review period by The Show Cause Order also alleged that the State made any effort to provide
up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. that on December 30, 2016, the Office of notice which was ‘reasonably
1675(c)(5)(B). Inspector General, U.S. Department of calculated’ to apprise appellant of the
Authority: These reviews are being Health and Human Services (HHS IG), pendency of the . . . proceedings.’’); see
conducted under authority of title VII of issued a letter to Registrant ‘‘excluding also Jones v. Flowers, 547 U.S. 220, 230
the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is [him] from participation in all Federal (2006) (citing with approval Robinson
published pursuant to section 207.62 of health care programs based on [his] and noting that its cases ‘‘require[] the
the Commission’s rules. felony conviction on March 30, 2016, in government to consider unique
By order of the Commission. the U.S. District Court for the Southern information about an intended recipient
Issued: September 29, 2017. District of Texas for health care fraud.’’ regardless of whether a statutory scheme
Lisa R. Barton, Id. at 2. The Show Cause Order further is reasonably calculated to provided
Secretary to the Commission. alleged that ‘‘[t]he exclusion was notice in the ordinary case’’).
effective twenty days from the date of I also found the Government’s service
[FR Doc. 2017–21429 Filed 10–4–17; 8:45 am]
the letter and is for a minimum period on the attorney insufficient. In holding
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
of twenty years.’’ Id. The Show Cause so, I explained that the CSA states that
Order then asserted that Registrant’s ‘‘[b]efore taking action pursuant to [21
‘‘DEA registration is also subject to U.S.C. 824(a)] . . . the Attorney General
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE revocation based on [his] exclusion from shall serve upon the . . . registrant an
participation in a program pursuant to order to show cause why registration
Drug Enforcement Administration should not be . . . revoked[ ] or
section 1320a–7(a) of Title 42.’’ Id.
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

Warren B. Dailey, M.D.; Decision and (citing 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(5)). suspended.’’ 21 U.S.C. 824(c) (emphasis
Order The Show Cause Order notified added). While I explained that the
Registrant of his right to request a Agency has found that service on an
On February 7, 2017, the Assistant hearing on the allegations, or to submit attorney may satisfy the CSA’s
Administrator, Diversion Control a written statement in lieu of a hearing, requirement that a Show Cause Order be
Division, Drug Enforcement the procedure for electing either option, ‘‘serve[d] upon the . . . registrant,’’ I
Administration (DEA), issued an Order and the consequence for failing to elect noted that the Agency has made clear

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:52 Oct 04, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM 05OCN1

Document Created: 2017-10-05 00:53:52
Document Modified: 2017-10-05 00:53:52

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Notice.
Dates		September 5, 2017.
Contact		Amanda Lawrence (202-205-3185), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FR Citation		82 FR 46524