82_FR_46721 82 FR 46529 - Sunshine Act Meeting

82 FR 46529 - Sunshine Act Meeting

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Foreign Claims Settlement Commission

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 192 (October 5, 2017)

Page Range46529-46530
FR Document2017-21613

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46529-46530]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21613]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission

[F.C.S.C. Meeting and Hearing Notice No. 9-17]


Sunshine Act Meeting

    The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its 
regulations

[[Page 46530]]

(45 CFR part 503.25) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 
552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of open meetings 
as follows:

Thursday, October 19, 2017:

    10:00 a.m.--Issuance of Proposed Decisions in claims against Iraq.

Status: Open.
    All meetings are held at the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 
600 E Street NW., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance 
notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be directed to: 
Patricia M. Hall, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E Street 
NW., Suite 6002, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-6975.

Brian M. Simkin,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2017-21613 Filed 10-3-17; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 4410-BA-P



                                                                            Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2017 / Notices                                                  46529

                                               controlled substances under the laws of                 Respondent ‘‘has been convicted of a                  summary-judgment movant makes out a
                                               the State in which he practices.’’ Id.                  felony under this subchapter,’’ thus                  prima facie case that would entitle him
                                               § 823(f). Because Congress has clearly                  subjecting his registration to sanction.              to a judgment as a matter of law if
                                               mandated that a practitioner possess                    21 U.S.C. 824(a)(2).                                  uncontroverted at trial, summary
                                               state authority in order to be deemed a                    In contrast to a practitioner’s loss of            judgment will be granted unless the
                                               practitioner under the Act, DEA has                     his state authority, this finding does not            opposing party offers some competent
                                               held repeatedly that revocation of a                    mandate the revocation of his                         evidence that could be presented at trial
                                               practitioner’s registration is the                      registration on this ground and the                   showing that there is a genuine dispute
                                               appropriate sanction whenever he is no                  Agency has held that a conviction is not              as to a material fact.’’). And finally, as
                                               longer authorized to dispense controlled                a per se bar to registration (as is the loss          the evidence shows that Respondent is
                                               substances under the laws of the State                  of state authority). See Jeffery M.                   only one year into a 30-year term of
                                               in which he practices medicine. See,                    Freesemann, 76 FR 60873 n.1 (2011)                    imprisonment, he has clearly
                                               e.g., Calvin Ramsey, 76 FR 20034, 20036                 (citing The Lawsons, 72 FR 74334,                     discontinued (even if involuntarily) his
                                               (2011); Sheran Arden Yeates, M.D., 71                   74338 (2007)); Michael S. Moore, 76 FR                professional practice. Cf. 21 CFR
                                               FR 39130, 39131 (2006); Dominick A.                     45867 (2011). Here, however,                          1301.52 (‘‘the registration of any person
                                               Ricci, 58 FR 51104, 51105 (1993); Bobby                 Respondent’s criminal conduct, which                  . . . shall terminate . . . if and when
                                               Watts, 53 FR 11919, 11920 (1988); see                   involves 120 felony convictions for                   such person . . . discontinues business
                                               also Frederick Marsh Blanton, 43 FR                     unlawful distribution, including for                  or professional practice’’). Thus, even if
                                               27616 (1978).                                           unlawful distribution resulting in death,             his state license had not been
                                                 Based on the Board’s Final Order of                   is so obviously egregious that revocation             suspended, his continued registration
                                               Automatic Suspension, it is undisputed                  is warranted. See Masters                             would violate DEA’s longstanding
                                               that Respondent is no longer currently                  Pharmaceutical, Inc., v. DEA, 861 F.3d                policy barring shelf registrations. See,
                                               authorized to dispense controlled                       206, 226 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (recognizing                e.g., Performance Construction, Inc., 67
                                               substances in Pennsylvania, the State in                Agency’s authority to revoke a                        FR 9993 (2002). Accordingly, I conclude
                                               which he is registered with the Agency.                 registration based on extensive and                   that the ALJ properly granted summary
                                               Respondent is therefore not entitled to                 egregious misconduct even if registrant               disposition on this ground. I further
                                               maintain his registration. This provides                had accepted responsibility); see also                conclude that Respondent’s multiple
                                               reason alone to revoke his registration                 Hatem Attaya, 81 FR 8221, 8244 (2016)                 felony convictions for violating the CSA
                                               and to deny any pending application for                 (‘‘[W]hile proceedings under 21 U.S.C.                provide an additional and independent
                                               registration in Pennsylvania.2                          823 and 824 are remedial in nature,                   basis for revoking his registration and
                                                                                                       there are cases in which,                             denying any pending application.
                                               Respondent’s Criminal Convictions
                                                                                                       notwithstanding a finding that a
                                                 Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(2), the                  registrant has credibly accepted                      Order
                                               Attorney General may also suspend or                    responsibility, the misconduct is so                     Pursuant to the authority vested in me
                                               revoke a registration issued under                      egregious and extensive that the                      by 21 U.S.C. 824(a) and 28 CFR 0.100(b),
                                               section 823 of Title 21, ‘‘upon a finding               protection of the public interest                     I order that DEA Certificate of
                                               that the registrant . . . has been                      nonetheless warrants the revocation of a              Registration No. BO3937781 and DATA-
                                               convicted of a felony under this                        registration or the denial of an                      Waiver Identification No. XO3937781
                                               subchapter’’ (the Controlled Substances                 application.’’) (citation omitted).                   issued to William J. O’Brien, III, D.O.,
                                               Act). Here too, it is undisputed that                      While ordinarily a respondent who                  be, and they hereby are, revoked. I
                                               Respondent has been convicted of more                   has been convicted of a felony subject                further order that any application of
                                               than 100 different felony violations of                 to section 824(a)(2) is entitled to present           William J. O’Brien, III, D.O. to renew or
                                               the CSA, including two of counts of                     a case as to why his registration should              modify this registration, or for any other
                                               conspiracy to distribute controlled                     not be revoked (or his application                    DEA registration, be, and it hereby is,
                                               substances, 21 U.S.C. 846; 117 counts of                denied), I nonetheless conclude that the              denied. This Order is effective
                                               distribution of controlled substances, in               ALJ properly granted summary                          immediately.5
                                               violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1) and                    disposition in this matter because there
                                               (b)(1)(C) and (b)(1)(E); and one count of                                                                       Dated: September 28, 2017.
                                                                                                       is no issue of any disputed material fact.
                                               distribution of controlled substances                   Here, even ignoring the manifest                      Chuck Rosenberg,
                                               resulting in death, in violation of 21                  egregiousness of Respondent’s criminal                Acting Administrator.
                                               U.S.C. 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C). While                   conduct, he has put forward no                        [FR Doc. 2017–21380 Filed 10–4–17; 8:45 am]
                                               Respondent asserts that his convictions                 evidence to show why he can be                        BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
                                               are not final because his case is on                    entrusted with a registration nor raised
                                               direct appeal, the District Court has                   any contention that he acknowledges
                                               entered the judgment and Respondent,                    his misconduct and has undertaken                     DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
                                               who is currently incarcerated in a                      remedial measures.4 See Medicine
                                               United States Penitentiary, points to no                Shoppe-Jonesborough, 73 FR 364, 387                   Foreign Claims Settlement
                                               order by the Court vacating the                         (2008) (other citations omitted). Cf. 10B             Commission
                                               judgment.3 Accordingly, I find that                     Charles Allen Wright, et al., Federal                 [F.C.S.C. Meeting and Hearing Notice No.
                                                 2 While this ground was not cited in the Show
                                                                                                       Practice and Procedure Civ. § 2727.2                  9–17]
                                               Cause Order, the Government provided
                                                                                                       (4th ed. April 2017 update) (‘‘If the
                                                                                                                                                             Sunshine Act Meeting
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                               constitutionally adequate notice that it was also
                                               seeking revocation on this basis when it served         involved a motion for amended findings under Rule
                                               Respondent with its Motion for Summary                  52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and has
                                                                                                                                                               The Foreign Claims Settlement
                                               Disposition and Respondent had a meaningful             no relevance to this matter.                          Commission, pursuant to its regulations
                                               opportunity to put forward evidence and contest           4 To the contrary, in his various filings,
                                               the issue. See Hatem Ataya, 81 FR 8221, 8244–45         Respondent maintains that various agents ‘‘misle[d]     5 Based on Respondent’s numerous convictions, I
                                               (2016).                                                 the grand jury to get the original indictment’’ and   conclude that the public interest necessitates that
                                                 3 As for Respondent’s reliance on Leishman v.         that ‘‘no warrants were issued for 19 videotaped      this Order be effective immediately. 21 CFR
                                               Associated Wholesale Electric Co., that case            visits.’’ Resp.’s Hrng. Req., at 1.                   1316.67.



                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:52 Oct 04, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00054   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM   05OCN1


                                               46530                        Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2017 / Notices

                                               (45 CFR part 503.25) and the                            of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606(a), at the                    November 1 and 2, 2017. The meeting
                                               Government in the Sunshine Act (5                       Site.                                                   will take place at the Bureau of Labor
                                               U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in                      The publication of this notice opens                  Statistics (BLS) Janet Norwood Training
                                               regard to the scheduling of open                        a period for public comment on the                      and Conference Center in Washington,
                                               meetings as follows:                                    Consent Decree. Comments should be                      DC. The WIAC was established in
                                                                                                       addressed to the Acting Assistant                       accordance with provisions of the
                                               Thursday, October 19, 2017:                             Attorney General, Environment and                       Federal Advisory Committee Act
                                                 10:00 a.m.—Issuance of Proposed                       Natural Resources Division, and should                  (FACA), as amended and will act in
                                               Decisions in claims against Iraq.                       refer to United States v. Aramark                       accordance with the applicable
                                               STATUS: Open.                                           Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC, Civil                    provisions of FACA and its
                                                 All meetings are held at the Foreign                  Action No. 3:17–cv–04062 (S.D.W. Va.),                  implementing regulation. The meeting
                                               Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E                     DJ Ref. No. 90–11–3–11369. All                          will be open to the public.
                                               Street NW., Washington, DC. Requests                    comments must be submitted no later                     DATES: The meeting will take place on
                                               for information, or advance notices of                  than 30 days after the publication date                 Wednesday, November 1, and Thursday,
                                               intention to observe an open meeting,                   of this notice. Comments may be                         November 2, 2017 from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
                                               may be directed to: Patricia M. Hall,                   submitted either by email or by mail:                   p.m. Public statements and requests for
                                               Foreign Claims Settlement Commission,                                                                           special accommodations or to address
                                               600 E Street NW., Suite 6002,                             To submit                                             the Advisory Council must be received
                                                                                                                                      Send them to:
                                                                                                         comments:
                                               Washington, DC 20579. Telephone:                                                                                by October 23, 2017.
                                               (202) 616–6975.                                         By email .......     pubcomment-ees.enrd@               ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
                                                                                                                              usdoj.gov.                       the BLS Janet Norwood Training and
                                               Brian M. Simkin,
                                                                                                       By mail .........    Assistant Attorney General,        Conference Center, Rooms 7 and 8, in
                                               Chief Counsel.                                                                 U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.              the Postal Square Building at 2
                                               [FR Doc. 2017–21613 Filed 10–3–17; 4:15 pm]                                    Box 7611, Washington, DC         Massachusetts Ave. NE., Washington,
                                               BILLING CODE 4410–BA–P                                                         20044–7611.                      DC 20212.
                                                                                                                                                               FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                         During the public comment period,
                                                                                                       the Consent Decree may be examined                      Steven Rietzke, Chief, Division of
                                               DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE                                                                                           National Programs, Tools, and
                                                                                                       and downloaded at this Justice
                                               Notice of Lodging of Proposed                           Department Web site: https://                           Technical Assistance, Employment and
                                               Consent Decree Under the                                www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.                   Training Administration, U.S.
                                               Comprehensive Environmental                             We will provide a paper copy of the                     Department of Labor, Room C–4510, 200
                                               Response, Compensation, and Liability                   Consent Decree upon written request                     Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
                                               Act                                                     and payment of reproduction costs.                      20210; Telephone: 202–693–3912. Mr.
                                                                                                       Please mail your request and payment                    Rietzke is the Designated Federal Officer
                                                  On September 28, 2017, the                                                                                   for the WIAC.
                                                                                                       to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—
                                               Department of Justice lodged a Consent                                                                          SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                                                                       ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC
                                               Decree with defendant Aramark                                                                                     Background: The WIAC is an
                                                                                                       20044–7611.
                                               Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC                             Please enclose a check or money order                 important component of the Workforce
                                               (‘‘Aramark’’) in the United States                      for $6.00 (25 cents per page                            Innovation and Opportunity Act. The
                                               District Court for the Southern District                reproduction cost) payable to the United                WIAC is a Federal Advisory Committee
                                               of West Virginia, Civil Action No. 3:17–                States Treasury. For a paper copy                       of workforce and labor market
                                               cv–04062. The Consent Decree resolves                   without the exhibits and signature                      information experts representing a
                                               a claim under Section 107(a)(2) of the                  pages, the cost is $5.25.                               broad range of national, State, and local
                                               Comprehensive Environmental                                                                                     data and information users and
                                               Response, Compensation, and Liability                   Jeffrey Sands,                                          producers. The purpose of the WIAC is
                                               Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607(a)(2),                 Assistant Section Chief, Environmental                  to provide recommendations to the
                                               for past response costs incurred in                     Enforcement Section, Environment and                    Secretary of Labor, working jointly
                                               connection with the release of PCE at                   Natural Resources Division.                             through the Assistant Secretary for
                                               the Coyne Textile Services Superfund                    [FR Doc. 2017–21394 Filed 10–4–17; 8:45 am]             Employment and Training and the
                                               Site, located in Huntington, West                       BILLING CODE 4410–15–P                                  Commissioner of Labor Statistics, to
                                               Virginia. The Complaint filed                                                                                   address: (1) The evaluation and
                                               concurrently with the Consent Decree                                                                            improvement of the nationwide
                                               alleges that Aramark, through a                         DEPARTMENT OF LABOR                                     workforce and labor market information
                                               predecessor company, owned and                                                                                  (WLMI) system and statewide systems
                                               operated an industrial laundry business                 Employment and Training                                 that comprise the nationwide system;
                                               at the Site from 1972 to 1982 that                      Administration                                          and (2) how the Department and the
                                               included a dry cleaning process that                                                                            States will cooperate in the management
                                               utilized perchloroethylene (‘‘PERC’’ or                 Workforce Information Advisory                          of those systems. These systems include
                                               ‘‘PCE’’). The proposed consent decree                   Council (WIAC)                                          programs to produce employment-
                                               obligates Aramark to reimburse $1.595                   AGENCY: Employment and Training                         related statistics and State and local
                                               million of the United States’ past                      Administration, Labor.                                  workforce and labor market information.
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                               response costs and provides Aramark a                   ACTION: Notice of meeting.                                The Department of Labor anticipates
                                               covenant not to sue for past response                                                                           the WIAC will accomplish its objectives
                                               costs incurred through May 10, 2017.                    SUMMARY:   Pursuant to the Workforce                    by: (1) Studying workforce and labor
                                               Aramark is performing the work at the                   Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014                  market information issues; (2) seeking
                                               Site pursuant to an administrative order                (WIOA), which amends the Wagner-                        and sharing information on innovative
                                               and agreement with EPA, which                           Peyser Act of 1933, notice is hereby                    approaches, new technologies, and data
                                               addresses claims under Section 106(a)                   given that the WIAC will meet on                        to inform employment, skills training,


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:52 Oct 04, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00055     Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM   05OCN1



Document Created: 2017-10-05 00:53:50
Document Modified: 2017-10-05 00:53:50
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation82 FR 46529 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR