82 FR 46666 - Prompt Remediation of Residual Radioactivity During Operation

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 193 (October 6, 2017)

Page Range		46666-46668
FR Document		2017-21546
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is discontinuing a rulemaking activity that would have required licensees to remediate residual radioactivity resulting from licensed activities during facility operations, rather than at license termination. The purpose of this action is to inform members of the public that this rulemaking activity is being discontinued and to provide a brief discussion of the NRC's decision to discontinue it. This rulemaking activity will no longer be reported in the NRC's portion of the Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions (the Unified Agenda).
Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 193 (Friday, October 6, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46666-46668]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21546]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

10 CFR Part 20

[NRC-2011-0162]
RIN 3150-AJ17


Prompt Remediation of Residual Radioactivity During Operation

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Discontinuation of rulemaking activity.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is discontinuing 
a rulemaking activity that would have required licensees to remediate 
residual radioactivity resulting from licensed activities during 
facility operations, rather than at license termination. The purpose of 
this action is to inform members of the public that this rulemaking 
activity is being discontinued and to provide a brief discussion of the 
NRC's decision to discontinue it. This rulemaking activity will no 
longer be reported in the NRC's portion of the Unified Agenda of 
Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions (the Unified Agenda).

DATES: This action is effective October 6, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2011-0162 when contacting the 
NRC about the availability of information regarding this action. You 
may obtain publicly available information related to this document 
using any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2011-0162. Address 
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact 
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 
this document.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the 
ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and 
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, 
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected]. The 
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this document 
(if that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time it 
is mentioned in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
     NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public 
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1F21, One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert D. MacDougall, Office of 
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-5175; email: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. Discussion
III. Availability of Documents
IV. Conclusion

I. Background

    This action is the culmination of a process of evaluating operating 
experience and interacting with the public since 2007 to determine 
whether the NRC should require licensees to remediate, during facility 
operations, releases of residual radioactivity into the surface and 
subsurface of their facility sites. Such remediation during operations 
has come to be known as ``prompt'' remediation. In order to permit a 
site to be released for unrestricted use, licensees are currently 
required to remediate, before license termination, all residual 
radioactivity at their facility sites to levels that provide reasonable 
assurance that no member of the public will receive a dose from the 
decommissioned facility greater than 25 millirem (mrem) per year.
    As a result of its evaluations and stakeholder interactions, the 
NRC staff recommended, and the Commission decided, to discontinue 
further work on a prompt remediation rulemaking. A discussion of this 
decision is provided in Section II of this document.

II. Discussion

    The Commission first directed the staff to study the potential need 
for a prompt remediation rulemaking when the Commission approved the 
proposed decommissioning planning rule (DPR) in 2007. In its staff 
requirements memorandum (SRM) on that proposed rule (ADAMS Accession 
No. ML073440549), the Commission directed the staff to ``make further 
improvements to the decommissioning planning process by addressing the 
remediation of residual radioactivity during the operational phase with 
the objective of avoiding complex decommissioning challenges that can 
lead to legacy sites.'' In its subsequent Federal Register document 
(FRN) for the proposed DPR, published January 22, 2008, the Commission 
defined ``legacy site'' as ``a facility that is in decommissioning with 
complex issues and an owner who cannot complete the decommissioning 
work for technical or financial reasons'' (73 FR 3813).
    Such a site could not be released for unrestricted use when the 
license is terminated, and would therefore require an institution, 
usually a government agency, to maintain and restrict access to the 
site to keep doses to members of the public below the individual site-
specific limit approved by the NRC.
    Under Sec.  20.1402 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 
(10 CFR), the

[[Page 46667]]

maximum dose limit for release of a site for unrestricted use by the 
public is 25 mrem per year. However, if the site is a legacy site 
requiring institutional controls on access, the Commission, assuming 
the eventual loss of such controls, may approve a higher limit up to 
500 mrem per year under 10 CFR 20.1403. It may also approve alternative 
release criteria under 10 CFR 20.1404. In either case, the licensee 
would have to demonstrate, among other things, that doses would be as 
low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) and the concerns of affected 
individuals and institutions in the community had been appropriately 
addressed. To minimize the future possibility of these alternatives to 
the unrestricted release of decommissioned sites, the objective of the 
proposed DPR was to ``improve decommissioning planning and thereby 
reduce the likelihood that any current operating facility will become a 
legacy site'' (73 FR 3812; January 22, 2008).
    The final DPR, published on June 17, 2011 (76 FR 35512), retained 
that objective, and took effect on December 17, 2012. The DPR requires 
licensees to conduct their operations to minimize the introduction of 
residual radioactivity into the site, which includes the site's 
subsurface soil and groundwater. Licensees may also be required to 
perform site surveys to determine whether residual radioactivity is 
present in subsurface areas, and to keep records of these surveys with 
records important for decommissioning. Among other things, the rule 
requires licensees to report additional details in their 
decommissioning cost estimates (76 FR 35512; June 17, 2011).
    The DPR does not, however, mandate that licensees remediate during 
operations. In response to a comment on the lack of such a requirement, 
the Commission noted in its FRN for the final rule that it ``allows a 
licensee who detects subsurface contamination either to conduct 
immediate remediation or to plan for and provide funds in the form of 
financial assurance to conduct remediation at a later time, including 
at the time of decommissioning. Thus, this final rule creates a 
potential incentive for immediate remediation instead of an increased 
financial assurance obligation'' (76 FR 35532; June 17, 2011).
    In parallel with the development of the final DPR, and in 
accordance with the Commission's 2007 directive to consider a prompt 
remediation requirement, the NRC staff developed a draft regulatory 
basis for a proposed rule to address prompt remediation (ADAMS 
Accession No. ML111580353). An FRN published on July 18, 2011 (76 FR 
42074), announced the NRC's ``Consideration of Rulemaking To Address 
Prompt Remediation of Residual Radioactivity During Operations.''
    The NRC staff held a public meeting and webinar on July 25, 2011, 
to discuss prompt remediation, and obtained and evaluated additional 
stakeholder comments for a revised draft regulatory basis for potential 
rulemaking (ADAMS Accession No. ML120190685). Subsequently, in SRM-
SECY-12-0046, ``Options for Revising the Regulatory Approach to 
Groundwater Protection'' (ADAMS Accession No. ML121450704), the 
Commission directed the staff on May 24, 2012, to seek additional 
stakeholder comments on the draft regulatory basis for a proposed 
prompt remediation rule. The Commission also directed the staff to 
evaluate the pros and cons of moving forward with a proposed prompt 
remediation rulemaking.
    The NRC staff held a public meeting and webinar on June 4, 2013, to 
obtain stakeholder comments on the ongoing prompt remediation issue. 
The staff then evaluated those comments and included the results in 
SECY-13-0108, ``Staff Recommendations for Addressing Remediation of 
Residual Radioactivity During Operations'' (ADAMS Accession No. 
ML13217A230). In SRM-SECY-13-0108 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13354B759), 
the Commission on December 20, 2013, approved the NRC staff's 
recommendation to collect 2 years of additional data on the 
implementation of the DPR. The Commission also directed that the staff, 
after collecting and evaluating the data and holding a public meeting 
with stakeholders, provide the Commission a paper ``with the staff's 
recommendation for addressing remediation of residual radioactivity at 
licensed facilities during the operational phase of the facility.''
    To evaluate the need for and potential benefits of additional 
rulemaking on prompt remediation, the NRC staff analyzed whether the 
manner of licensee compliance with the DPR has been adequate to prevent 
future legacy sites (see SECY-16-0121, ``Staff Recommendations For 
Rulemaking To Address Remediation of Residual Radioactivity During 
Operation,'' October 16, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16235A298)). The 
staff evaluated: (1) NRC inspection results; (2) licensee event reports 
and radiological effluent monitoring reports; (3) the financial 
assurance mechanisms available to support decommissioning at different 
types of facilities; (4) the results of the Nuclear Energy Institute 
(NEI) 07-07, ``Industry Groundwater Protection Initiative'' (ADAMS 
Accession No. ML072610036) and associated groundwater contamination 
evaluations; (5) guidance promulgated by the NRC and industry groups 
such as NEI and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI); and (6) 
stakeholder feedback from a July 11, 2016, public webinar and other 
forums.
    Based on these information sources, the NRC staff concluded in 
SECY-16-0121 that:
     Existing dose limits codified in the NRC's regulations 
provide adequate protection of public health and safety during 
operation, and an additional rule requiring prompt remediation would 
provide limited additional benefit.
     The current DPR requires early identification of residual 
radioactivity that, if allowed to spread, could prevent a site from 
being released for unrestricted use at license termination. The DPR 
also requires timely adjustments to decommissioning financial 
instruments to ensure that adequate funding will be available after 
facility shutdown to remediate any such residual radioactivity to 
comply with the criteria for license termination in 10 CFR part 20, 
appendix E. These requirements mitigate the potential that residual 
contamination unaccounted for in a licensee's funding for 
decommissioning would lead to a future legacy site.
     In some circumstances, mandated remediation during 
operation could adversely affect operational safety, as certain 
locations may be safely accessible only after operations have ceased or 
when operating conditions permit. This would be the case, for example, 
if residual radioactivity were suspected underneath a building within 
which a licensee was using or storing radioactive materials.
     Groundwater resources are protected from abnormal releases 
by effective groundwater monitoring programs, as well as industry 
initiatives where appropriate, to identify significant residual 
radioactivity early in the operating life of the facility. Examples of 
such initiatives are the NEI 07-07 effort and supporting EPRI guidance 
for evaluating potential groundwater contamination.
     Licensees are effectively complying with the DPR. The 
current regulations are sufficient to ensure that when a facility 
ceases operation, site characterization will have resulted in the 
appropriate identification of all significant residual subsurface 
radioactivity, and adequate financial resources will be available to 
complete decommissioning for release of the site

[[Page 46668]]

for unrestricted use at the time of license termination. Two bases for 
this confidence are that no new legacy sites have been identified since 
the NRC's financial assurance regulations were promulgated in 1988, and 
no sites have had to make adjustments to their decommissioning funds 
due to the identification of significant residual radioactivity since 
implementation of the DPR.
    The staff also found in SECY-16-0121 that residual radioactivity 
detected to date has been limited mostly to onsite areas, and there has 
not been a significant impact on public health and safety. Under 
current regulations, this is unlikely to change. In addition to 
complying with applicable dose standards, for example, licensees also 
must comply with the requirement in 10 CFR 20.1101(b) to ``use, to the 
extent practical, procedures and engineering controls . . . to achieve 
. . . doses to members of the public as low as reasonably achievable 
(ALARA).'' By requiring public doses to be ALARA, existing NRC 
regulations provide ample assurance that the need for a prompt 
remediation rule is unlikely to grow with time.
    Based on these considerations, earlier assessments, and its 
conclusions from the 2 additional years of operating experience, the 
NRC staff in SECY-16-0121 recommended that further work on a prompt 
remediation rule be discontinued. On December 21, 2016, in SRM-SECY-16-
0121 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16356A583), the Commission accepted the 
staff's recommendation.
    From the staff's evaluation of how licensees are complying with the 
DPR and other NRC regulations limiting doses to members of the public, 
the Commission has determined that licensees are operating their 
facilities to minimize leaks and spills, monitor for residual 
radioactivity, adjust decommissioning funding to account for residual 
surface and subsurface radioactivity, and maintain doses to the public 
within regulatory limits, including ALARA requirements. Compliance with 
these regulations protects public health and safety and significantly 
reduces the potential for additional legacy sites.

III. Availability of Documents

    The documents identified in the following table are available to 
interested persons through one or more of the following methods, as 
indicated.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          ADAMS Accession No./ Federal
               Document                        Register citation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Decommissioning Planning; Proposed     73 FR 3812
 Rule (January 22, 2008).
Decommissioning Planning; Final Rule   76 FR 35512
 (June 17, 2011).
SRM--SECY-07-0177--Proposed Rule:      ML073440549
 Decommissioning Planning.
Draft Proposed Technical Basis For     ML111580353
 Prompt Remediation, Rev. 4.
Federal Register document              76 FR 42074
 ``Consideration of Rulemaking to
 Address Prompt Remediation of
 Residual Radioactivity During
 Operations.'' (July 18, 2011).
Draft Technical Basis For Prompt       ML120190685
 Remediation, Rev. 3.
SRM-SECY-12-0046, ``Options for        ML121450704
 Revising the Regulatory Approach to
 Groundwater Protection''.
SECY-13-0108, ``Staff Recommendations  ML13217A230
 for Addressing Remediation of
 Residual Radioactivity During
 Operations''.
SRM-SECY-13-0108 ``Staff               ML13354B759
 Recommendations For Addressing
 Remediation Of Residual
 Radioactivity During Operations''.
Nuclear Energy Institute, NEI 07-07,   ML072610036
 ``Industry Groundwater Protection
 Initiative''.
SECY-16-0121, ``Staff Recommendations  ML16235A298
 For Rulemaking To Address
 Remediation Of Residual
 Radioactivity During Operation''.
SRM-SECY-16-0121, ``Staff              ML16356A583
 Recommendations For Rulemaking To
 Address Remediation Of Residual
 Radioactivity During Operation''.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    The NRC is no longer pursuing revisions to its regulations in 10 
CFR part 20 for the reasons discussed in this document. In the next 
edition of the Unified Agenda, the NRC will update the entry for this 
rulemaking activity and reference this document to indicate that it is 
no longer being pursued. This rulemaking activity will appear in the 
``Completed Actions'' section of that edition of the Unified Agenda, 
but will not appear in future editions. If the NRC decides to pursue 
similar or related rulemaking activities in the future, it will inform 
the public through a new rulemaking entry in the Unified Agenda.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day of October 2017.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-21546 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 193 / Friday, October 6, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 46667

maximum dose limit for release of a site published on July 18, 2011 (76 FR (NEI) 07–07, ‘‘Industry Groundwater
for unrestricted use by the public is 25 42074), announced the NRC’s Protection Initiative’’ (ADAMS
mrem per year. However, if the site is ‘‘Consideration of Rulemaking To Accession No. ML072610036) and
a legacy site requiring institutional Address Prompt Remediation of associated groundwater contamination
controls on access, the Commission, Residual Radioactivity During evaluations; (5) guidance promulgated
assuming the eventual loss of such Operations.’’ by the NRC and industry groups such as
controls, may approve a higher limit up The NRC staff held a public meeting NEI and the Electric Power Research
to 500 mrem per year under 10 CFR and webinar on July 25, 2011, to discuss Institute (EPRI); and (6) stakeholder
20.1403. It may also approve alternative prompt remediation, and obtained and feedback from a July 11, 2016, public
release criteria under 10 CFR 20.1404. evaluated additional stakeholder webinar and other forums.
In either case, the licensee would have comments for a revised draft regulatory Based on these information sources,
to demonstrate, among other things, that basis for potential rulemaking (ADAMS the NRC staff concluded in SECY–16–
doses would be as low as reasonably Accession No. ML120190685). 0121 that:
achievable (ALARA) and the concerns Subsequently, in SRM–SECY–12–0046, • Existing dose limits codified in the
of affected individuals and institutions ‘‘Options for Revising the Regulatory NRC’s regulations provide adequate
in the community had been Approach to Groundwater Protection’’ protection of public health and safety
appropriately addressed. To minimize (ADAMS Accession No. ML121450704), during operation, and an additional rule
the future possibility of these the Commission directed the staff on requiring prompt remediation would
alternatives to the unrestricted release of May 24, 2012, to seek additional provide limited additional benefit.
decommissioned sites, the objective of stakeholder comments on the draft • The current DPR requires early
the proposed DPR was to ‘‘improve regulatory basis for a proposed prompt identification of residual radioactivity
decommissioning planning and thereby remediation rule. The Commission also that, if allowed to spread, could prevent
reduce the likelihood that any current directed the staff to evaluate the pros a site from being released for
operating facility will become a legacy and cons of moving forward with a unrestricted use at license termination.
site’’ (73 FR 3812; January 22, 2008). proposed prompt remediation The DPR also requires timely
The final DPR, published on June 17, rulemaking. adjustments to decommissioning
2011 (76 FR 35512), retained that The NRC staff held a public meeting financial instruments to ensure that
objective, and took effect on December and webinar on June 4, 2013, to obtain adequate funding will be available after
17, 2012. The DPR requires licensees to stakeholder comments on the ongoing facility shutdown to remediate any such
conduct their operations to minimize prompt remediation issue. The staff residual radioactivity to comply with
the introduction of residual then evaluated those comments and the criteria for license termination in 10
radioactivity into the site, which included the results in SECY–13–0108, CFR part 20, appendix E. These
includes the site’s subsurface soil and ‘‘Staff Recommendations for Addressing requirements mitigate the potential that
groundwater. Licensees may also be Remediation of Residual Radioactivity residual contamination unaccounted for
required to perform site surveys to During Operations’’ (ADAMS Accession in a licensee’s funding for
determine whether residual No. ML13217A230). In SRM–SECY–13– decommissioning would lead to a future
radioactivity is present in subsurface 0108 (ADAMS Accession No. legacy site.
areas, and to keep records of these ML13354B759), the Commission on • In some circumstances, mandated
surveys with records important for December 20, 2013, approved the NRC remediation during operation could
decommissioning. Among other things, staff’s recommendation to collect 2 adversely affect operational safety, as
the rule requires licensees to report years of additional data on the certain locations may be safely
additional details in their implementation of the DPR. The accessible only after operations have
decommissioning cost estimates (76 FR Commission also directed that the staff, ceased or when operating conditions
35512; June 17, 2011). after collecting and evaluating the data permit. This would be the case, for
The DPR does not, however, mandate and holding a public meeting with example, if residual radioactivity were
that licensees remediate during stakeholders, provide the Commission a suspected underneath a building within
operations. In response to a comment on paper ‘‘with the staff’s recommendation which a licensee was using or storing
the lack of such a requirement, the for addressing remediation of residual radioactive materials.
Commission noted in its FRN for the radioactivity at licensed facilities during • Groundwater resources are
final rule that it ‘‘allows a licensee who the operational phase of the facility.’’ protected from abnormal releases by
detects subsurface contamination either To evaluate the need for and potential effective groundwater monitoring
to conduct immediate remediation or to benefits of additional rulemaking on programs, as well as industry initiatives
plan for and provide funds in the form prompt remediation, the NRC staff where appropriate, to identify
of financial assurance to conduct analyzed whether the manner of significant residual radioactivity early
remediation at a later time, including at licensee compliance with the DPR has in the operating life of the facility.
the time of decommissioning. Thus, this been adequate to prevent future legacy Examples of such initiatives are the NEI
final rule creates a potential incentive sites (see SECY–16–0121, ‘‘Staff 07–07 effort and supporting EPRI
for immediate remediation instead of an Recommendations For Rulemaking To guidance for evaluating potential
increased financial assurance Address Remediation of Residual groundwater contamination.
obligation’’ (76 FR 35532; June 17, Radioactivity During Operation,’’ • Licensees are effectively complying
2011). October 16, 2016 (ADAMS Accession with the DPR. The current regulations
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES

In parallel with the development of No. ML16235A298)). The staff are sufficient to ensure that when a
the final DPR, and in accordance with evaluated: (1) NRC inspection results; facility ceases operation, site
the Commission’s 2007 directive to (2) licensee event reports and characterization will have resulted in
consider a prompt remediation radiological effluent monitoring reports; the appropriate identification of all
requirement, the NRC staff developed a (3) the financial assurance mechanisms significant residual subsurface
draft regulatory basis for a proposed rule available to support decommissioning at radioactivity, and adequate financial
to address prompt remediation (ADAMS different types of facilities; (4) the resources will be available to complete
Accession No. ML111580353). An FRN results of the Nuclear Energy Institute decommissioning for release of the site

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:21 Oct 05, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\06OCR1.SGM 06OCR1
46668 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 193 / Friday, October 6, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

for unrestricted use at the time of practical, procedures and engineering and other NRC regulations limiting
license termination. Two bases for this controls . . . to achieve . . . doses to doses to members of the public, the
confidence are that no new legacy sites members of the public as low as Commission has determined that
have been identified since the NRC’s reasonably achievable (ALARA).’’ By licensees are operating their facilities to
financial assurance regulations were requiring public doses to be ALARA, minimize leaks and spills, monitor for
promulgated in 1988, and no sites have existing NRC regulations provide ample residual radioactivity, adjust
had to make adjustments to their assurance that the need for a prompt decommissioning funding to account for
decommissioning funds due to the remediation rule is unlikely to grow residual surface and subsurface
identification of significant residual with time. radioactivity, and maintain doses to the
radioactivity since implementation of Based on these considerations, earlier public within regulatory limits,
the DPR. assessments, and its conclusions from including ALARA requirements.
The staff also found in SECY–16–0121 the 2 additional years of operating Compliance with these regulations
that residual radioactivity detected to experience, the NRC staff in SECY–16–
date has been limited mostly to onsite protects public health and safety and
0121 recommended that further work on
areas, and there has not been a significantly reduces the potential for
a prompt remediation rule be
significant impact on public health and additional legacy sites.
discontinued. On December 21, 2016, in
safety. Under current regulations, this is SRM–SECY–16–0121 (ADAMS III. Availability of Documents
unlikely to change. In addition to Accession No. ML16356A583), the
complying with applicable dose Commission accepted the staff’s The documents identified in the
standards, for example, licensees also recommendation. following table are available to
must comply with the requirement in 10 From the staff’s evaluation of how interested persons through one or more
CFR 20.1101(b) to ‘‘use, to the extent licensees are complying with the DPR of the following methods, as indicated.

ADAMS
Accession No./
Document Federal Register
citation

Decommissioning Planning; Proposed Rule (January 22, 2008) ........................................................................................... 73 FR 3812
Decommissioning Planning; Final Rule (June 17, 2011) ........................................................................................................ 76 FR 35512
SRM—SECY–07–0177—Proposed Rule: Decommissioning Planning .................................................................................. ML073440549
Draft Proposed Technical Basis For Prompt Remediation, Rev. 4 ........................................................................................ ML111580353
FEDERAL REGISTER document ‘‘Consideration of Rulemaking to Address Prompt Remediation of Residual Radioactivity 76 FR 42074
During Operations.’’ (July 18, 2011).
Draft Technical Basis For Prompt Remediation, Rev. 3 ......................................................................................................... ML120190685
SRM–SECY–12–0046, ‘‘Options for Revising the Regulatory Approach to Groundwater Protection’’ .................................. ML121450704
SECY–13–0108, ‘‘Staff Recommendations for Addressing Remediation of Residual Radioactivity During Operations’’ ...... ML13217A230
SRM–SECY–13–0108 ‘‘Staff Recommendations For Addressing Remediation Of Residual Radioactivity During Oper- ML13354B759
ations’’.
Nuclear Energy Institute, NEI 07–07, ‘‘Industry Groundwater Protection Initiative’’ ............................................................... ML072610036
SECY–16–0121, ‘‘Staff Recommendations For Rulemaking To Address Remediation Of Residual Radioactivity During ML16235A298
Operation’’.
SRM–SECY–16–0121, ‘‘Staff Recommendations For Rulemaking To Address Remediation Of Residual Radioactivity ML16356A583
During Operation’’.

IV. Conclusion For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Federal Reserve Banks (Reserve Banks)
Annette L. Vietti-Cook, to conform to amendments to
The NRC is no longer pursuing Secretary of the Commission. regulations governing the use of the
revisions to its regulations in 10 CFR [FR Doc. 2017–21546 Filed 10–5–17; 8:45 am] Automated Clearing House (ACH)
part 20 for the reasons discussed in this BILLING CODE 7590–01–P Network by Federal agencies announced
document. In the next edition of the by the Department of the Treasury,
Unified Agenda, the NRC will update Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal
the entry for this rulemaking activity FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Service). Specifically, the amended
and reference this document to indicate posting rules conform to the decision of
that it is no longer being pursued. This 12 CFR Chapter II the Fiscal Service to allow Federal
rulemaking activity will appear in the agencies to originate and receive same-
[Docket No. OP–1572]
‘‘Completed Actions’’ section of that day entries beginning September 15,
edition of the Unified Agenda, but will Policy on Payment System Risk 2017.
not appear in future editions. If the NRC DATES: This policy revision is applicable
decides to pursue similar or related AGENCY: Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System. beginning on September 15, 2017.
rulemaking activities in the future, it FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
ACTION: Policy statement.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES

will inform the public through a new Jeffrey D. Walker, Assistant Director
rulemaking entry in the Unified Agenda. SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the (202–721–4559), Jason Hinkle, Manager,
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day Federal Reserve System (Board) has Financial Risk Management (202–912–
of October 2017. revised part II of the Federal Reserve 7805), or Ian C.B. Spear, Senior
Policy on Payment System Risk (PSR Financial Services Analyst (202–452–
policy) related to the transaction posting 3959), Division of Reserve Bank
times used for measuring balances Operations and Payment Systems; for
intraday in institutions’ accounts at the users of Telecommunication Devices for

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:21 Oct 05, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\06OCR1.SGM 06OCR1
Document Created: 2017-10-06 00:08:34
Document Modified: 2017-10-06 00:08:34
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Discontinuation of rulemaking activity.
Dates		This action is effective October 6, 2017.
Contact		Robert D. MacDougall, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-5175; email: [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 46666
RIN Number		3150-AJ17