82_FR_46941 82 FR 46748 - Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 6-Month Extension of Final Determination on the Proposed Threatened Status for the Louisiana Pinesnake

82 FR 46748 - Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 6-Month Extension of Final Determination on the Proposed Threatened Status for the Louisiana Pinesnake

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 193 (October 6, 2017)

Page Range46748-46749
FR Document2017-21591

We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce a 6-month extension of the final determination of whether to list the Louisiana pinesnake (Pituophis ruthveni) as a threatened species. We also reopen the comment period on the proposed rule to list the species for an additional 30 days. We are taking this action based on substantial disagreement regarding available information related to the interpretation of the available survey data used to determine the Louisiana pinesnake's status and trends. Comments previously submitted need not be resubmitted as they are already incorporated into the public record and will be fully considered in the final rule. We will submit a final listing determination to the Federal Register for publication on or before April 6, 2018.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 193 (Friday, October 6, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46748-46749]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21591]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 17

[Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2016-0121; 4500030113]
RIN 1018-BB46


Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 6-Month Extension 
of Final Determination on the Proposed Threatened Status for the 
Louisiana Pinesnake

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of the comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce a 
6-month extension of the final determination of whether to list the 
Louisiana pinesnake (Pituophis ruthveni) as a threatened species. We 
also reopen the comment period on the proposed rule to list the species 
for an additional 30 days. We are taking this action based on 
substantial disagreement regarding available information related to the 
interpretation of the available survey data used to determine the 
Louisiana pinesnake's status and trends. Comments previously submitted 
need not be resubmitted as they are already incorporated into the 
public record and will be fully considered in the final rule. We will 
submit a final listing determination to the Federal Register for 
publication on or before April 6, 2018.

DATES: The comment period for the proposed rule published October 6, 
2016 (81 FR 69454), is reopened. We will accept comments received or 
postmarked on or before November 6, 2017. If you comment using the 
Federal eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES), you must submit your 
comments by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing date.

ADDRESSES: Document availability: You may obtain copies of the proposed 
rule on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov at Docket No. FWS-
R4-ES-2016-0121. Copies of the proposed rule are also available at 
https://www.fws.gov/southeast/lafayette/.
    Comment submission: You may submit comments by one of the following 
methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. In the 
Search box, enter the docket number for this proposed rule, which is 
FWS-R4-ES-2016-0121. Then click on the Search button. You may submit a 
comment by clicking on ``Comment Now!'' Please ensure that you have 
found the correct rulemaking before submitting your comment.
    2. U.S. mail or hand delivery: Public Comments Processing, Attn: 
Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2016-0121; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MS: 
BPHC; 5275 Leesburg Pike; Falls Church, VA 22041-3803.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Ranson, Field Supervisor, U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service, Louisiana Ecological Services Office, 646 
Cajundome Blvd., Suite 400, Lafayette, LA; telephone 337-291-3101. 
Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call 
the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On October 6, 2016 (81 FR 69454), we published under the Endangered 
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), a 
proposed rule to add the Louisiana pinesnake as a threatened species to 
the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife in title 50 of the Code 
of Federal Regulations (50 CFR 17.11(h)). That

[[Page 46749]]

proposal had a 60-day comment period, ending December 5, 2016. We also 
solicited and received independent scientific review of the information 
contained in the proposed rule from peer reviewers with expertise in 
the Louisiana pinesnake or similar species, in accordance with our July 
1, 1994, peer review policy (59 FR 34270). For a description of 
previous Federal actions concerning the Louisiana pinesnake, please 
refer to the proposed listing rule.
    Section 4(b)(6) of the Act and its implementing regulations at 50 
CFR 424.17(a) require that we take one of three actions within 1 year 
of a proposed listing and concurrent proposed designation of critical 
habitat: (1) Finalize the proposed rule; (2) withdraw the proposed 
rule; or (3) extend the final determination by not more than 6 months, 
if there is substantial disagreement regarding the sufficiency or 
accuracy of the available data relevant to the determination.
    Since the publication of the October 6, 2016, proposed listing rule 
(81 FR 69454), there has been substantial disagreement regarding 
available information related to the interpretation of the available 
survey data used to determine the Louisiana pinesnake's status and 
trends. Specifically, during the public comment period, we received 
multiple comments on the proposed listing and the sufficiency or 
accuracy of the available data used to support it. In particular, the 
comments reflected significant disagreement, including from one of the 
peer reviewers, regarding the interpretation of the available data used 
to determine the Louisiana pinesnake's status and trends, including the 
current conservation status of the Louisiana pinesnake in Louisiana 
and, particularly, in Texas. Therefore, in consideration of these 
disagreements, we have determined that a 6-month extension of the final 
determination for this rulemaking is necessary, and we are hereby 
extending the final determination for 6 months in order to solicit and 
consider additional information that will help to clarify these issues 
and to fully analyze data that are relevant to our final listing 
determination. With this 6-month extension, we will make a final 
determination on the proposed rule no later than April 6, 2018.

Information Requested

    We will accept written comments and information during this 
reopened comment period on our proposed listing rule. We will consider 
information and recommendations from all interested parties. We intend 
that any final action resulting from the proposal be as accurate as 
possible and based on the best available scientific and commercial 
data.
    We are particularly interested in new information and comments 
regarding:
    (1) The interpretation of scientific literature in the proposed 
rulemaking, and whether we overlooked any scientific literature in our 
analysis. In particular, some commenters expressed concern that there 
is insufficient scientific information (survey data in particular) to 
adequately assess the conservation status of the species, while others 
expressed concern that the available scientific information supports an 
endangered determination.
    (2) Additional survey information, including maps, throughout the 
Louisiana pinesnake's range, especially for Texas.
    (3) Trapping results to determine the Louisiana pinesnake's 
estimated occupied habitat areas (EOHAs). During the peer review 
period, peer reviewers were critical of methods used to determine EOHAs 
and questioned the interpretation that resulted from our analysis.
    If you previously submitted comments or information on the October 
6, 2016, proposed rule (81 FR 69454), please do not resubmit them. We 
have incorporated previously submitted comments into the public record, 
and we will fully consider them in the preparation of our final 
determination. Our final determination concerning the proposed listing 
will take into consideration all written comments and any additional 
information we receive.
    You may submit your comments and materials concerning the proposed 
rule by one of the methods listed in ADDRESSES, above. We request that 
you send comments only by the methods described in ADDRESSES.
    If you submit information via http://www.regulations.gov, your 
entire submission--including any personal identifying information--will 
be posted on the Web site. If your submission is made via a hardcopy 
that includes personal identifying information, you may request at the 
top of your document that we withhold this information from public 
review. However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. We 
will post all hardcopy submissions on http://www.regulations.gov.
    Comments and materials we receive, as well as supporting 
documentation we used in preparing the proposed rule, will be available 
for public inspection on http://www.regulations.gov, or by appointment, 
during normal business hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 
Louisiana Ecological Services Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT).

    Authority: The authority for this action is the Endangered 
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

    Dated: August 30, 2017.
James W. Kurth,
Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-21591 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4333-15-P



                                                      46748                    Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 193 / Friday, October 6, 2017 / Proposed Rules

                                                      Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,                     ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.                 of the available survey data used to
                                                      October 4, 1993);                                       804(2).                                               determine the Louisiana pinesnake’s
                                                         • does not impose an information                       Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean                status and trends. Comments previously
                                                      collection burden under the provisions                  Air Act, petitions for judicial review of             submitted need not be resubmitted as
                                                      of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44                      this action must be filed in the United               they are already incorporated into the
                                                      U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);                                   States Court of Appeals for the                       public record and will be fully
                                                         • is certified as not having a                       appropriate circuit by December 11,                   considered in the final rule. We will
                                                      significant economic impact on a                        2017. Filing a petition for                           submit a final listing determination to
                                                      substantial number of small entities                    reconsideration by the Administrator of               the Federal Register for publication on
                                                      under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5                 this final rule does not affect the finality          or before April 6, 2018.
                                                      U.S.C. 601 et seq.);                                    of this action for the purposes of judicial           DATES: The comment period for the
                                                         • does not contain any unfunded                      review nor does it extend the time                    proposed rule published October 6,
                                                      mandate or significantly or uniquely                    within which a petition for judicial                  2016 (81 FR 69454), is reopened. We
                                                      affect small governments, as described                  review may be filed, and shall not                    will accept comments received or
                                                      in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act                     postpone the effectiveness of such rule               postmarked on or before November 6,
                                                      of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);                                or action. This action may not be                     2017. If you comment using the Federal
                                                         • does not have Federalism                           challenged later in proceedings to                    eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES),
                                                      implications as specified in Executive                  enforce its requirements. (See section                you must submit your comments by
                                                      Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,                    307(b)(2).)                                           11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing
                                                      1999);
                                                                                                                                                                    date.
                                                         • is not an economically significant                 List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
                                                      regulatory action based on health or                                                                          ADDRESSES: Document availability: You
                                                                                                                Environmental protection, Air                       may obtain copies of the proposed rule
                                                      safety risks subject to Executive Order                 pollution control, Incorporation by
                                                      13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);                                                                          on the Internet at http://
                                                                                                              reference, Intergovernmental relations,               www.regulations.gov at Docket No.
                                                         • is not a significant regulatory action             Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
                                                      subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR                                                                       FWS–R4–ES–2016–0121. Copies of the
                                                                                                              recordkeeping requirements, Volatile                  proposed rule are also available at
                                                      28355, May 22, 2001);                                   organic compounds.
                                                         • is not subject to requirements of                                                                        https://www.fws.gov/southeast/
                                                      Section 12(d) of the National                             Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.                   lafayette/.
                                                      Technology Transfer and Advancement                       Dated: September 6, 2017.                             Comment submission: You may
                                                      Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because                Catherine R. McCabe,
                                                                                                                                                                    submit comments by one of the
                                                      application of those requirements would                                                                       following methods:
                                                                                                              Acting Regional Administrator, Region 2.
                                                      be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;                                                                         1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
                                                                                                              [FR Doc. 2017–21521 Filed 10–5–17; 8:45 am]           www.regulations.gov. In the Search box,
                                                      and
                                                         • does not provide the EPA with the                                                                        enter the docket number for this
                                                                                                              BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

                                                      discretionary authority to address, as                                                                        proposed rule, which is FWS–R4–ES–
                                                      appropriate, disproportionate human                                                                           2016–0121. Then click on the Search
                                                      health or environmental effects, using                  DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR                            button. You may submit a comment by
                                                      practicable and legally permissible                                                                           clicking on ‘‘Comment Now!’’ Please
                                                                                                              Fish and Wildlife Service                             ensure that you have found the correct
                                                      methods, under Executive Order 12898
                                                      (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).                                                                              rulemaking before submitting your
                                                         In addition, this rule does not have                 50 CFR Part 17                                        comment.
                                                      tribal implications as specified by                     [Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2016–0121;                         2. U.S. mail or hand delivery: Public
                                                      Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,                     4500030113]                                           Comments Processing, Attn: Docket No.
                                                      November 9, 2000), because the SIP is                                                                         FWS–R4–ES–2016–0121; U.S. Fish and
                                                                                                              RIN 1018–BB46                                         Wildlife Service, MS: BPHC; 5275
                                                      not approved to apply in Indian country
                                                      located in the state, and the EPA notes                                                                       Leesburg Pike; Falls Church, VA 22041–
                                                                                                              Endangered and Threatened Wildlife                    3803.
                                                      that it will not impose substantial direct              and Plants; 6-Month Extension of Final
                                                      costs on tribal governments or preempt                                                                        FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                              Determination on the Proposed
                                                      tribal law.                                             Threatened Status for the Louisiana                   Joseph Ranson, Field Supervisor, U.S.
                                                         The Congressional Review Act, 5                                                                            Fish and Wildlife Service, Louisiana
                                                                                                              Pinesnake
                                                      U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small                                                                     Ecological Services Office, 646
                                                      Business Regulatory Enforcement                         AGENCY:   Fish and Wildlife Service,                  Cajundome Blvd., Suite 400, Lafayette,
                                                      Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides                Interior.                                             LA; telephone 337–291–3101. Persons
                                                      that before a rule may take effect, the                 ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of the               who use a telecommunications device
                                                      agency promulgating the rule must                       comment period.                                       for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
                                                      submit a rule report, which includes a                                                                        Relay Service at 800–877–8339.
                                                      copy of the rule, to each House of the                  SUMMARY:  We, the U.S. Fish and                       SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                      Congress and to the Comptroller General                 Wildlife Service (Service), announce a
                                                      of the United States. The EPA will                      6-month extension of the final                        Background
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                      submit a report containing this action                  determination of whether to list the                     On October 6, 2016 (81 FR 69454), we
                                                      and other required information to the                   Louisiana pinesnake (Pituophis                        published under the Endangered
                                                      U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of                          ruthveni) as a threatened species. We                 Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act;
                                                      Representatives, and the Comptroller                    also reopen the comment period on the                 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), a proposed rule
                                                      General of the United States prior to                   proposed rule to list the species for an              to add the Louisiana pinesnake as a
                                                      publication of the rule in the Federal                  additional 30 days. We are taking this                threatened species to the List of
                                                      Register. A major rule cannot take effect               action based on substantial                           Endangered and Threatened Wildlife in
                                                      until 60 days after it is published in the              disagreement regarding available                      title 50 of the Code of Federal
                                                      Federal Register. This action is not a                  information related to the interpretation             Regulations (50 CFR 17.11(h)). That


                                                 VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:27 Oct 05, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00033   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\06OCP1.SGM   06OCP1


                                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 193 / Friday, October 6, 2017 / Proposed Rules                                               46749

                                                      proposal had a 60-day comment period,                   accurate as possible and based on the                 Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
                                                      ending December 5, 2016. We also                        best available scientific and commercial              CONTACT).
                                                      solicited and received independent                      data.                                                   Authority: The authority for this action is
                                                      scientific review of the information                       We are particularly interested in new              the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
                                                      contained in the proposed rule from                     information and comments regarding:                   amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
                                                      peer reviewers with expertise in the                       (1) The interpretation of scientific
                                                                                                              literature in the proposed rulemaking,                  Dated: August 30, 2017.
                                                      Louisiana pinesnake or similar species,
                                                                                                              and whether we overlooked any                         James W. Kurth,
                                                      in accordance with our July 1, 1994,
                                                      peer review policy (59 FR 34270). For a                 scientific literature in our analysis. In             Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
                                                                                                              particular, some commenters expressed                 Service.
                                                      description of previous Federal actions
                                                      concerning the Louisiana pinesnake,                     concern that there is insufficient                    [FR Doc. 2017–21591 Filed 10–5–17; 8:45 am]
                                                      please refer to the proposed listing rule.              scientific information (survey data in                BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
                                                         Section 4(b)(6) of the Act and its                   particular) to adequately assess the
                                                      implementing regulations at 50 CFR                      conservation status of the species, while
                                                      424.17(a) require that we take one of                   others expressed concern that the                     DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                                      three actions within 1 year of a                        available scientific information supports
                                                      proposed listing and concurrent                         an endangered determination.                          National Oceanic and Atmospheric
                                                      proposed designation of critical habitat:                  (2) Additional survey information,                 Administration
                                                      (1) Finalize the proposed rule; (2)                     including maps, throughout the
                                                      withdraw the proposed rule; or (3)                      Louisiana pinesnake’s range, especially               50 CFR Part 648
                                                      extend the final determination by not                   for Texas.                                            RIN 0648–BF82
                                                      more than 6 months, if there is                            (3) Trapping results to determine the
                                                      substantial disagreement regarding the                  Louisiana pinesnake’s estimated                       Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
                                                      sufficiency or accuracy of the available                occupied habitat areas (EOHAs). During                Conservation and Management Act
                                                      data relevant to the determination.                     the peer review period, peer reviewers                Provisions; Fisheries of the
                                                         Since the publication of the October                 were critical of methods used to                      Northeastern United States; Essential
                                                      6, 2016, proposed listing rule (81 FR                   determine EOHAs and questioned the                    Fish Habitat
                                                      69454), there has been substantial                      interpretation that resulted from our
                                                      disagreement regarding available                        analysis.                                             AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries
                                                      information related to the interpretation                  If you previously submitted                        Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
                                                      of the available survey data used to                    comments or information on the                        Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
                                                      determine the Louisiana pinesnake’s                     October 6, 2016, proposed rule (81 FR                 Commerce.
                                                      status and trends. Specifically, during                 69454), please do not resubmit them.                  ACTION: Notice of availability of fishery
                                                      the public comment period, we received                  We have incorporated previously                       management plan amendment; request
                                                      multiple comments on the proposed                       submitted comments into the public                    for comments.
                                                      listing and the sufficiency or accuracy of              record, and we will fully consider them
                                                                                                              in the preparation of our final                       SUMMARY:   The New England Fishery
                                                      the available data used to support it. In
                                                                                                              determination. Our final determination                Management Council has submitted the
                                                      particular, the comments reflected
                                                                                                              concerning the proposed listing will                  Omnibus Essential Fish Habitat
                                                      significant disagreement, including from
                                                      one of the peer reviewers, regarding the                take into consideration all written                   Amendment 2, incorporating an
                                                      interpretation of the available data used               comments and any additional                           Environmental Impact Statement, for
                                                      to determine the Louisiana pinesnake’s                  information we receive.                               review by the Secretary of Commerce.
                                                      status and trends, including the current                   You may submit your comments and                   NMFS is requesting comments from the
                                                      conservation status of the Louisiana                    materials concerning the proposed rule                public on the Omnibus Amendment,
                                                      pinesnake in Louisiana and,                             by one of the methods listed in                       which was developed by the Council to
                                                      particularly, in Texas. Therefore, in                   ADDRESSES, above. We request that you                 revise the essential fish habitat
                                                      consideration of these disagreements,                   send comments only by the methods                     designations for each Council-managed
                                                      we have determined that a 6-month                       described in ADDRESSES.                               species, designate Habitat Areas of
                                                      extension of the final determination for                   If you submit information via http://              Particular Concern, revise the system of
                                                      this rulemaking is necessary, and we are                www.regulations.gov, your entire                      essential fish habitat management areas,
                                                      hereby extending the final                              submission—including any personal                     address seasonal groundfish spawning
                                                      determination for 6 months in order to                  identifying information—will be posted                spatial management, establish Dedicated
                                                      solicit and consider additional                         on the Web site. If your submission is                Habitat Research Areas, and identify
                                                      information that will help to clarify                   made via a hardcopy that includes                     actions that can be modified by
                                                      these issues and to fully analyze data                  personal identifying information, you                 framework and other administrative
                                                      that are relevant to our final listing                  may request at the top of your document               concerns relating to the Amendment.
                                                      determination. With this 6-month                        that we withhold this information from                The intended effect of this action is to
                                                      extension, we will make a final                         public review. However, we cannot                     ensure the Council’s fishery
                                                      determination on the proposed rule no                   guarantee that we will be able to do so.              management plans comply with the
                                                                                                              We will post all hardcopy submissions                 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                      later than April 6, 2018.
                                                                                                              on http://www.regulations.gov.                        Conservation and Management Act’s
                                                      Information Requested                                      Comments and materials we receive,                 requirements to routinely review and
                                                        We will accept written comments and                   as well as supporting documentation we                update essential fish habitat
                                                      information during this reopened                        used in preparing the proposed rule,                  designations and to continue to
                                                      comment period on our proposed listing                  will be available for public inspection               minimize to the extent practicable the
                                                      rule. We will consider information and                  on http://www.regulations.gov, or by                  adverse effects of fishing on such
                                                      recommendations from all interested                     appointment, during normal business                   designated habitat.
                                                      parties. We intend that any final action                hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife                  DATES: Public comments must be
                                                      resulting from the proposal be as                       Service, Louisiana Ecological Services                received on or before December 5, 2017.


                                                 VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:27 Oct 05, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00034   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\06OCP1.SGM   06OCP1



Document Created: 2017-10-06 00:08:57
Document Modified: 2017-10-06 00:08:57
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionProposed rule; reopening of the comment period.
DatesThe comment period for the proposed rule published October 6, 2016 (81 FR 69454), is reopened. We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before November 6, 2017. If you comment using the
ContactJoseph Ranson, Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Louisiana Ecological Services Office, 646 Cajundome Blvd., Suite 400, Lafayette, LA; telephone 337-291-3101. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339.
FR Citation82 FR 46748 
RIN Number1018-BB46

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR