82 FR 46764 - Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 193 (October 6, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 193 (October 6, 2017)
| Page Range | 46764-46766 | |
| FR Document | 2017-21588 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 46764-46766] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-21588] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-533-843] Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: In response to requests from interested parties, the Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain lined paper products (CLPP) from India, covering the period September 1, 2015, through August 31, 2016. This review covers two mandatory respondents, Navneet Education Ltd. (Navneet) and SAB International (SAB) and five non- selected companies. We preliminarily find that Navneet and SAB did not sell subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR). Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable October 6, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Robinson or Sam Brummitt, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-3797 or (202) 482-7851, respectively. Background On November 9, 2016, the Department published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping order on lined paper from India.\1\ The Department initiated this administrative review covering the following nine companies: Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products Pvt. Ltd. (Kokuyo Riddhi), Lodha Offset Limited (Lodha), Magic International Pvt. Ltd. (Magic), Marisa International (Marisa), [[Page 46765]] Navneet, Pioneer Stationery Pvt Ltd. (Pioneer), SAB, SGM Paper Products, and Super Impex. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 78778 (November 9, 2016) (Initiation Notice). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On May 15, 2017, the Department extended the deadline for the preliminary results to October 2, 2017.\2\ From July 19, 2017, through July 28, 2017, the Department conducted cost and sales verifications of SAB.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016,'' dated May 15, 2017. \3\ See Memorandum, ``2015-2016 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Verification of Sales Questionnaire Responses of SAB International'' dated September 29, 2017 (SAB Sales Verification Report); see also Memorandum, ``2015-2016 Antidumping Administrative Review of Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Verification of Cost Questionnaire Responses of SAB International'' dated September 29, 2017 (SAB Cost Verification Report). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the CLPP Order \4\ is certain lined paper products. The merchandise subject to this order is currently classified under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080, 4820.30.0040, 4810.22.5044, 4811.90.9050, 4811.90.9090, 4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020, 4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040, 4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and 4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description remains dispositive.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper Products from the People's Republic of China; Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the People's Republic of China; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 (September 28, 2006) (CLPP Order). \5\ For a complete description of the Scope of the Order, see Memorandum titled, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Lined Paper Products from India; 2015-2016,'' dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Determination of No Shipments Lodha and Marisa reported that they made no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. To confirm Lodha's and Marisa's no shipment claims, the Department issued a no-shipment inquiry to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) requesting that it review Lodha's and Marisa's no-shipment claims.\6\ CBP did not report that it had any information to contradict Lodha's and Marisa's claims of no shipments during the POR. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See No Shipments Inquiry for certain lined paper products from India Produced and/or Exported by Lodha Offset and Marisa International (A-533-843), message number 6365302 (December 30, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Given that Lodha and Marisa certified that they made no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR, and there is no information calling their claims into question, we preliminarily determine that Lodha and Marisa did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR. Consistent with the Department's practice, we will not rescind the review with respect to Lodha and Marisa but, rather, will complete the review and issue instructions to CBP based on the final results.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2012-2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR, at 51306-51307 (August 28, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed export price or export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Constructed Value (CV) SAB reported that it made no sales in the home market during the POR.\8\ Pursuant to 773(a)(1)(C)(i) of the Act, we examined SAB's third country sales and have determined that such sales do not constitute a viable comparison market (CM) within the meaning of section 773(a)(1)(B)(ii)(II) of the Act.\9\ Therefore, for these preliminary results, we relied on CV as the basis for calculating NV, in accordance with sections 773(a)(4) and (e) of the Act.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See SAB's February 14, 2017 Section A Questionnaire Response (SAB February 14, 2017 AQR), at 3-4 and Exhibit A-1. \9\ Id. \10\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 18-22. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of the Review As a result of this review, we preliminarily calculated a dumping margin of zero percent for both Navneet and SAB. We are applying to the non-selected companies the rates calculated for the mandatory respondents in these preliminary results, as referenced below.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See Albemarle Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United States, 821 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (Albemarle). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Producer/exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Navneet Education Ltd....................................... 0.00 SAB International........................................... 0.00 Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products Pvt. Ltd....................... 0.00 Magic International Pvt. Ltd................................ 0.00 Pioneer Stationery Pvt Ltd.................................. 0.00 SGM Paper Products.......................................... 0.00 Super Impex................................................. 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Rate Upon issuance of the final results, the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. If the weighted-average dumping margin for Navneet or SAB is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\12\ We will instruct CBP to [[Page 46766]] assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is above de minimis (i.e., 0.5 percent). Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review where applicable. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ In these preliminary results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In accordance with the Department's ``automatic assessment'' practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each respondent for which it did not know that its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for respondents noted above will be the rates established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 3.91 percent, the all-others rate established in the investigation as modified by the section 129 determination.\13\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See Implementation of the Findings of the WTO Panel in US-- Zeroing (EC): Notice of Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Revocations and Partial Revocations of Certain Antidumping Duty Orders, 72 FR 25261 (May 4, 2007). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclosure and Public Comment The Department will disclose to parties to this proceeding the calculations performed in reaching the preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of these preliminary results.\14\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\15\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with the argument: (1) A statement of the issue, (2) a brief summary of the argument, and (3) a table of authorities.\16\ All briefs must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic records system, ACCESS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b). \15\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). \16\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, using Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS system within 30 days of publication of this notice.\17\ Requests should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, we will inform parties of the scheduled date for the hearing which will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and location to be determined.\18\ Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \18\ See 19 CFR 351.310. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), the Department will issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of the issues raised by the parties in their case briefs, within 120 days after issuance of these preliminary results. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and increase the subsequent assessment of the antidumping duties. These preliminary results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(4). Dated: October 2, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Extension of Preliminary Results IV. Scope of the Order V. Discussion of Methodology Preliminary Determination of No Shipments Date of Sale Product Comparisons Comparisons to Normal Value A. Determination of Comparison Method B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis Export Price Normal Value A. Home Market Viability B. Level of Trade Navneet SAB C. Sales to Affiliated Customers D. Cost of Production Analysis 1. Calculation of COP 2. Test of Comparison Market Prices and COP 3. Results of COP Test E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices F. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Constructed Value Margin for Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination Currency Conversion VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-21588 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![46764 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 193 / Friday, October 6, 2017 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Analysis of Comments Received Dated: October 2, 2017.
Madeline Heeren, AD/CVD Operations, Gary Taverman,
Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, The issues discussed in the Decision Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Memorandum are: (1) The likelihood of and Countervailing Duty Operations,
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, continuation or recurrence of dumping, performing the non-exclusive functions and
DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–9179. and (2) the magnitude of the margins of duties of the Assistant Secretary for
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: dumping likely to prevail if these orders Enforcement and Compliance.
were revoked.4 Parties can find a [FR Doc. 2017–21590 Filed 10–5–17; 8:45 am]
Background complete discussion of all issues raised BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
The Department published the in this review, and the corresponding
antidumping duty orders on butt-weld recommendations, in the Decision
fittings from Italy, Malaysia, and the Memorandum, which is on file DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Philippines on February 23, 2001.1 On electronically via Enforcement and
June 2, 2017, pursuant to section 751(c) International Trade Administration
Compliance’s Antidumping and
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended Countervailing Duty Centralized [A–533–843]
(the Act), the Department initiated Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
sunset reviews of the antidumping duty Certain Lined Paper Products From
ACCESS is available to registered users
orders on butt-weld fittings from Italy, India: Preliminary Results of
at http://access.trade.gov and is
Malaysia, and the Philippines.2 On June Antidumping Duty Administrative
16, 2017, the Department received a available to all parties in the Central Review and Preliminary Determination
notice of intent to participate from Core Records Unit in room B8024 of the main of No Shipments; 2015–2016
Pipe Products, Inc.; Shaw Alloy Piping Commerce building. In addition, a
Products, Inc.; and Taylor Forge complete version of the Decision AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Stainless, Inc. (collectively, the Memorandum can be accessed directly International Trade Administration,
Domestic Interested Parties), within the on the Internet at http://trade.gov/ Department of Commerce.
deadline specified in 19 CFR enforcement/. The signed Decision SUMMARY: In response to requests from
351.218(d)(1)(i). The Domestic Memorandum and electronic versions of interested parties, the Department of
Interested Parties are manufacturers of a the Decision Memorandum are identical Commerce (the Department) is
domestic like product in the United in content. conducting an administrative review of
States and, accordingly, are domestic the antidumping duty order on certain
interested parties pursuant to section Final Results of Review lined paper products (CLPP) from India,
771(9)(C) of the Act. covering the period September 1, 2015,
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and through August 31, 2016. This review
On June 30, 2017, the Department 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, the
received an adequate substantive covers two mandatory respondents,
Department determines that revocation Navneet Education Ltd. (Navneet) and
response to the notice of initiation from
of the antidumping duty orders of butt- SAB International (SAB) and five non-
Domestic Interested Parties within the
weld pipe fittings from Italy, Malaysia, selected companies. We preliminarily
30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department did and the Philippines would likely to lead find that Navneet and SAB did not sell
not receive any timely filed responses to a continuation or recurrence of subject merchandise at less than normal
from the respondent interested parties, dumping and that the magnitude of the value (NV) during the period of review
i.e., butt-weld fitting producers and dumping margins likely to prevail (POR). Interested parties are invited to
exporters from Italy, Malaysia, and the would be 26.59 percent for Italy, 7.51 comment on these preliminary results.
Philippines. On the basis of the notices percent for Malaysia, and up to 33.81 DATES: Applicable October 6, 2017.
of intent to participate and adequate percent for the Philippines. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
substantive responses filed by the Administrative Protective Order Cindy Robinson or Sam Brummitt, AD/
Domestic Interested Parties, and the CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement
inadequate response from any This notice also serves as the only and Compliance, International Trade
respondent interested party, the reminder to parties subject to Administration, U.S. Department of
Department conducted an expedited administrative protective order (APO) of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
(120-day) sunset review of the order their responsibility concerning the NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone
pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the return or destruction of proprietary (202) 482–3797 or (202) 482–7851,
Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). information disclosed under APO in respectively.
Scope of the Orders accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Background
The product covered by the Orders is Timely notification of the return of
destruction of APO materials or On November 9, 2016, the Department
butt-weld fittings from Italy, Malaysia, published a notice of initiation of an
and the Philippines.3 conversion to judicial protective order is
administrative review of the
hereby requested. Failure to comply
antidumping order on lined paper from
1 See Antidumping Duty Orders: Stainless Steel with the regulations and terms of an India.1 The Department initiated this
Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Italy, Malaysia, and APO is a violation which is subject to administrative review covering the
the Philippines, 66 FR 11257 (February 23, 2001)
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
sanction. following nine companies: Kokuyo
(LTFV Orders).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 82 The Department is issuing and Riddhi Paper Products Pvt. Ltd.
FR 25599 (June 2, 2017) (Sunset Initiation). publishing these final results and notice (Kokuyo Riddhi), Lodha Offset Limited
3 For a full description of the scope of the orders,
in accordance with sections 751(c), (Lodha), Magic International Pvt. Ltd.
See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Review of 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 (Magic), Marisa International (Marisa),
the Antidumping Duty Orders on Stainless Steel CFR 351.218.
Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Italy, Malaysia, and 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
the Philippines,’’ dated concurrently with this Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
notice (Decision Memorandum). 4 Id. 78778 (November 9, 2016) (Initiation Notice).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:40 Oct 05, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM 06OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_46957/page/1.svg)
![46766 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 193 / Friday, October 6, 2017 / Notices
assess antidumping duties on all deposit requirements, when imposed, Notification to Importers
appropriate entries covered by this shall remain in effect until further
review when the importer-specific notice. This notice serves as a preliminary
assessment rate calculated in the final reminder to importers of their
results of this review is above de Disclosure and Public Comment responsibility under 19 CFR
minimis (i.e., 0.5 percent). Where either 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
The Department will disclose to
the respondent’s weighted-average parties to this proceeding the regarding the reimbursement of
dumping margin is zero or de minimis, calculations performed in reaching the antidumping duties and/or
or an importer-specific assessment rate preliminary results within five days of countervailing duties prior to
is zero or de minimis, we will instruct the date of publication of these liquidation of the relevant entries
CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries during this review period. Failure to
preliminary results.14 Pursuant to 19
without regard to antidumping duties. comply with this requirement could
CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties
The final results of this review shall be result in the Secretary’s presumption
may submit case briefs not later than 30
the basis for the assessment of that reimbursement of antidumping
days after the date of publication of this
antidumping duties on entries of duties occurred and increase the
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues
merchandise covered by the final results subsequent assessment of the
of this review where applicable. raised in the case briefs, may be filed
not later than five days after the date for antidumping duties.
In accordance with the Department’s
‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice, for filing case briefs.15 Parties who submit These preliminary results of review
entries of subject merchandise during case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this are issued and published in accordance
the POR produced by each respondent proceeding are requested to submit with with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
for which it did not know that its the argument: (1) A statement of the the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and
merchandise was destined for the issue, (2) a brief summary of the 351.221(b)(4).
United States, we will instruct CBP to argument, and (3) a table of
Dated: October 2, 2017.
liquidate unreviewed entries at the all- authorities.16 All briefs must be filed
electronically using ACCESS. An Gary Taverman,
others rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in electronically filed document must be Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
the transaction. received successfully in its entirety by and Countervailing Duty Operations,
We intend to issue instructions to the Department’s electronic records performing the non-exclusive functions and
system, ACCESS. duties of the Assistant Secretary for
CBP 15 days after publication of the
Enforcement and Compliance.
final results of this review. Interested parties who wish to request
Cash Deposit Requirements a hearing must submit a written request Appendix
to the Assistant Secretary for List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
The following cash deposit Enforcement and Compliance, U.S.
requirements will be effective upon Decision Memorandum
Department of Commerce, using
publication of the notice of final results Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS I. Summary
of administrative review for all II. Background
system within 30 days of publication of
shipments of subject merchandise III. Extension of Preliminary Results
this notice.17 Requests should contain
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, IV. Scope of the Order
the party’s name, address, and
for consumption on or after the V. Discussion of Methodology
telephone number, the number of
publication date of the final results of Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
participants, and a list of the issues to Date of Sale
this administrative review, as provided be discussed. If a request for a hearing
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) Product Comparisons
is made, we will inform parties of the Comparisons to Normal Value
The cash deposit rate for respondents scheduled date for the hearing which
noted above will be the rates established A. Determination of Comparison Method
will be held at the U.S. Department of B. Results of the Differential Pricing
in the final results of this administrative Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
review; (2) for merchandise exported by Analysis
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at Export Price
producers or exporters not covered in a time and location to be determined.18
this administrative review but covered Normal Value
Parties should confirm by telephone the A. Home Market Viability
in a prior segment of the proceeding, the date, time, and location of the hearing.
cash deposit rate will continue to be the B. Level of Trade
company-specific rate published for the Unless the deadline is extended Navneet
most recently completed segment of this pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the SAB
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), the C. Sales to Affiliated Customers
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a
Department will issue the final results D. Cost of Production Analysis
firm covered in this review, a prior
of this administrative review, including 1. Calculation of COP
review, or the original investigation, but
the results of our analysis of the issues 2. Test of Comparison Market Prices and
the producer is, the cash deposit rate
raised by the parties in their case briefs, COP
will be the rate established for the most
within 120 days after issuance of these 3. Results of COP Test
recently completed segment of this
preliminary results. E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
proceeding for the producer of the Comparison Market Prices
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash F. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
deposit rate for all other producers or Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay
Round Agreements Act and Revocations and Partial Constructed Value
exporters will continue to be 3.91 Revocations of Certain Antidumping Duty Orders, Margin for Companies Not Selected for
percent, the all-others rate established 72 FR 25261 (May 4, 2007). Individual Examination
in the investigation as modified by the 14 See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Currency Conversion
section 129 determination.13 These cash 15 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
VI. Recommendation
16 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
13 See Implementation of the Findings of the WTO 17 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). [FR Doc. 2017–21588 Filed 10–5–17; 8:45 am]
Panel in US—Zeroing (EC): Notice of 18 See 19 CFR 351.310. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:40 Oct 05, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM 06OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_46957/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-10-06 00:09:26
Document Modified: 2017-10-06 00:09:26
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable October 6, 2017. | |
| Contact | Cindy Robinson or Sam Brummitt, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-3797 or (202) 482-7851, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 46764 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR