82 FR 46799 - Notice of Waivers Granted Under Section 9401 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as Amended
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 193 (October 6, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 193 (October 6, 2017)
| Page Range | 46799-46803 | |
| FR Document | 2017-21619 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 46799-46803] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-21619] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Notice of Waivers Granted Under Section 9401 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as Amended AGENCY: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of Education. ACTION: Notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: In this notice, we announce the waivers that the U.S. Department of Education (Department) granted during calendar year 2015 under the waiver authority in section 9401 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (ESEA), including waivers related to flexibilities granted to States in exchange for State-led reforms (ESEA flexibility). The ESEA requires that the Department publish in the Federal Register, and disseminate to interested parties, a notice of its decision to grant a waiver of statutory or regulatory requirements under the ESEA. Between 2011 and 2016, the Department granted more than 800 waivers of statutory or regulatory requirements to State educational agencies (SEAs) but neglected to comply with the ESEA's publication and dissemination requirements. This notice is intended to fulfill the Department's obligation to publicize its waiver decisions by identifying the waivers granted during each calendar year. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kia Weems, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 3W341, Washington, DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 260-2221 or by email: [email protected]. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1- 800-877-8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 2015, the Department granted waivers under ESEA flexibility to 43 States under the waiver authority in section 9401 of the ESEA, in exchange for rigorous and comprehensive State-developed plans designed to improve student academic achievement and increase the quality of instruction. An additional 93 waivers that were not part of ESEA flexibility also were granted under the waiver authority in section 9401 of the ESEA. We granted: a. Ten waivers under ESEA flexibility to each of 43 States granting flexibility from ESEA requirements to improve student academic achievement and increase the quality of instruction: 1. Allowing SEAs flexibility to select one of three options for setting new ambitious, but achievable annual measurable objectives (AMOs); 2. Allowing flexibility in implementation of school improvement requirements to relieve local educational agencies (LEAs) of the requirement to identify schools for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring, as appropriate, and to take certain improvement actions in identified schools; 3. Allowing flexibility in implementation of LEA improvement requirements to relieve SEAs of the requirement to identify LEAs for improvement or corrective action, as appropriate, and to take certain improvement actions for identified LEAs; 4. Granting flexibility for rural LEAs; 5. Permitting LEAs to operate a schoolwide program in a priority school or a focus school that does not meet the 40 percent poverty threshold and is implementing a schoolwide intervention; 6. Allowing SEAs flexibility to distribute school improvement funds to LEAs for use in priority and focus schools; 7. Allowing funds reserved for State awards program to go to any reward school; 8. Relating to highly qualified teacher (HQT) improvement plan requirements; 9. Relating to limitations on the transferability of certain funds; and 10. Permitting SEAs flexibility to award School Improvement Grant (SIG) funds to an LEA to implement one of the four SIG models in any priority school. In addition to waiving the 10 provisions listed above, the Department granted three optional waivers to 43 States under ESEA flexibility related to the following: 1. 21st Century Community Learning Centers (21st CCLC) requirements, allowing SEAs flexibility to permit community learning centers to use 21st CCLC funds to support expanded learning time during the school day in addition to activities during non-school hours or periods when school is not in session; 2. Requirements to make adequate yearly progress (AYP) determinations; and 3. Requirements pertaining to Title I, Part A within-district allocations; b. Forty-five waivers extending the period in which funds were available for obligation: 40 waivers for school improvement activities, one waiver for Consolidated Grant funds for Insular Areas, one waiver for State assessment activities, and three waivers extending the period for SIG carryover funds; c. One waiver granting LEAs additional time to meet teacher and principal evaluation requirements for cohort 5 SIG schools; d. Five waivers allowing SEAs to approve schools or LEAs identified as in need of improvement to become supplemental educational services (SES) providers; e. Ten waivers of requirements pertaining to State academic standards or assessments: Four waivers allowing substitution of standards or assessments and six waivers exempting SEAs or LEAs from reporting assessment or accountability determinations; f. Fourteen waivers of the third of three annual measureable achievement objectives (AMAOs 3) under Title III, due to lack of assessment data in the 2014-2015 school year; g. Two waivers allowing SEAs flexibility to distribute section 1003(a) funds to LEAs for use in priority and focus schools; h. Five waivers of the requirement to make AYP determinations; i. Six waivers allowing LEAs to carry out significant education reforms to improve student achievement; j. Two waivers authorizing an SEA to waive the carryover limitation for an LEA that needs an additional waiver; k. One waiver of the requirement to provide parents notice of public school choice options at least 14 days before the start of the school year; l. One waiver pertaining to school support and recognition allowing flexibility in the use of funds reserved for State awards program to go to any reward school; and [[Page 46800]] m. One waiver enabling LEAs to use the term ``highly qualified teacher'' to refer to a teacher who received a summative rating of ``effective,'' ``highly effective,'' or ``exemplary'' and earned at least 50 percent of the possible student achievement measures in the State's teacher evaluation and support system. Waiver Data I. ESEA Flexibility Renewals To Continue To Improve Student Academic Achievement and Increase the Quality of Instruction A. Flexibility Regarding the 2013-14 Timeline for Setting AMOs Allowed SEAs flexibility to develop new ambitious but achievable AMOs in reading/language arts and mathematics in order to provide meaningful goals that will be used to guide support and improvement efforts for the State, LEAs, schools, and student subgroups. Provisions waived: Section 1111(b)(2)(E) through (H) of the ESEA. B. Flexibility in Implementation of School Improvement Requirements 1. Granted flexibility relating to the requirement for LEAs to identify schools for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring and corresponding requirements. Section 1116(b)(13), which requires LEAs to permit a child who has transferred to remain in the choice school through the highest grade in the school, was not waived. Provision waived: Section 1116(b) of the ESEA (except (b)(13)). 2. Waivers granting flexibility of the requirement for SEAs and LEAs to take a variety of actions to offer SES to eligible students in schools identified for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring. Provision waived: Section 1116(e) of the ESEA. C. Flexibility in Implementation of LEA Improvement Requirements Granted flexibility with respect to the requirement that SEAs identify LEAs for improvement and corrective action and take certain action in those LEAs. Provisions waived: Section 1116(c)(3) and (5)-(11) of the ESEA. D. Flexibility for Rural LEAs 1. Allowed flexibility to use Small, Rural School Achievement Program (SRSA) funds regardless of the AYP status of the LEA so that LEAs receiving SRSA funds that fail to make AYP may continue to use these funds. Provision waived: Section 6213(b) of the ESEA. 2. Allowed SEAs flexibility to permit an LEA to continue to receive a Rural and Low-Income School program (RLIS) grant even if the LEA fails to make AYP. Provision waived: Section 6224(e) of the ESEA. E. Flexibility for Schoolwide Programs Waivers permitted LEAs to operate a schoolwide program in a priority school or a focus school that does not meet the schoolwide poverty threshold of 40 percent and is implementing a schoolwide intervention. Provision waived: Section 1114(a)(1) of the ESEA. F. Flexibility To Support School Improvement Waivers regarding the State-level reservations to support school improvement, allowing SEAs flexibility to distribute reserved funds to LEAs for use in priority and focus schools. The required reservation was not waived; the waiver merely permitted an SEA to distribute the funds to schools that were not identified for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring. Provision waived: Section 1003(a) of the ESEA. G. Flexibility in the Use of Funds Reserved for State Award Programs Allowed funds reserved for State awards programs to go to any reward school. Provision waived: Section 1117(b)(1)(B) of the ESEA. H. Waivers Regarding HQT Improvement Plans Waived the requirements regarding HQT improvement plans and related technical assistance and provided flexibility with respect to the use of Title I, Part A funds for paraprofessionals. Provisions waived: Section 2141(a)-(c) of the ESEA. I. Flexibility To Transfer Certain Funds 1. Permitted the SEA to transfer up to 100 percent of the amount from a covered program into another covered program or into Title I, Part A. Provision waived: Section 6123(a) of the ESEA. 2. Permitted LEAs flexibility in percentage limitations as well as in the use of transferred funds. Provision waived: Section 6123(b)(1) of the ESEA. 3. Waivers of the requirements relating to modification of plans and notice of transfer. Provision waived: Section 6123(d) of the ESEA. 4. Permitted LEAs flexibility to exclude funds transferred into Title I, Part A from the base in calculating any set-aside percentages. Provision waived: Section 6123(e)(1) of the ESEA. J. Flexibility To Use SIG Funds To Support Priority Schools Permitted SEAs to award SIG funds to an LEA to implement one of the four SIG models (Turnaround, Restart, Closure, Transformation) in any priority school. Provisions waived: Section 1003(g)(4) of the ESEA and section I.A.3 of the notice of final requirements for SIG Grants, published in the Federal Register on October 28, 2010 (74 FR 65618). K. Flexibility in the Use of 21st CCLC Program Funds Permitted an eligible entity that received funds under the 21st CCLC program to use those funds to support expanded learning time during the school day, week, or year in addition to activities during non-school hours or periods when school is not in session. Provisions waived: Sections 4201(b)(1)(A) and 4204(b)(2)(A) of the ESEA. L. Flexibility Regarding Making AYP Determinations Waived the requirements to make AYP determinations. Instead, an SEA and its LEAs would report on their report cards performance against the AMOs for all subgroups identified in section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v) of the ESEA, and would use performance against the AMOs to support continuous improvement in Title I schools. Provisions waived: Section 1116(a)(1)(A)-(B) and (c)(1)(A) of the ESEA. M. Flexibility Regarding Within-District Title I Allocations Permitted an LEA to serve with Title I funds a Title I-eligible high school with a graduation rate below 60 percent that the SEA identified as a priority school even if that school did not rank sufficiently high to be served based solely on the school's poverty rate. Provisions waived: Section 1113(a)(3)-(4) and (c)(1) of the ESEA. Waiver Applicants:Alabama State Department of Education Alaska Department of Education and Early Development Arizona Department of Education Arkansas Department of Education Colorado Department of Education Connecticut State Department of Education Delaware Department of Education District of Columbia Office of the State Superintendent of Education [[Page 46801]] Florida Department of Education Georgia Department of Education Hawaii State Department of Education Idaho State Department of Education Indiana Department of Education Kansas State Department of Education Kentucky Department of Education Louisiana Department of Education Maine Department of Education Maryland State Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Michigan Department of Education Minnesota Department of Education Mississippi Department of Education Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Nevada Department of Education New Hampshire Department of Education New Jersey Department of Education New Mexico Public Education Department New York State Education Department North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Ohio Department of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Oregon Department of Education Pennsylvania Department of Education Puerto Rico Department of Education Rhode Island Department of Education South Carolina Department of Education South Dakota Department of Education Tennessee Department of Education Texas Education Agency Utah State Office of Education Virginia Department of Education West Virginia Department of Education Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction II. Extensions of the Obligation Period A. Forty Waivers To Extend the Period of Availability of SIG Funds 1. Extended the period of availability of fiscal year (FY) 2010 SIG funds awarded to two States under section 1003(g) of the ESEA. Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of the General Education Provisions Act (GEPA) (20 U.S.C. 1225(b)). Waiver Applicants: Illinois State Board of Education Tennessee Department of Education 2. Extended the period of availability of FY 2011 SIG funds awarded to two States under section 1003(g) of the ESEA. Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA (20 U.S.C. 1225(b)). Waiver Applicants: Illinois State Board of Education Minnesota Department of Education 3. Extended the period of availability of FY 2012 SIG funds awarded to seven States under section 1003(g) of the ESEA. Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA (20 U.S.C. 1225(b)). Waiver Applicants: California Department of Education Minnesota Department of Education New Hampshire Department of Education New Jersey Department of Education Ohio Department of Education Tennessee Department of Education Virginia Department of Education 4. Extended the period of availability of FY 2013 SIG funds awarded to two States under section 1003(g) of the ESEA. Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA (20 U.S.C. 1225(b)). Waiver Applicants: Rhode Island Department of Education South Carolina Department of Education 5. Extended the period of availability of FY 2014 SIG funds awarded to 25 States under section 1003(g) of the ESEA. Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA (20 U.S.C. 1225(b)). Waiver Applicants: Alaska Department of Education and Early Development California Department of Education Florida Department of Education Georgia Department of Education Hawaii State Department of Education Illinois State Board of Education Iowa Department of Education Louisiana Department of Education Maryland State Department of Education Michigan Department of Education Mississippi Department of Education Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Montana Office of Public Instruction New Jersey Department of Education New Mexico Public Education Department North Carolina Department of Public Instruction North Dakota Department of Public Instruction Ohio Department of Education Rhode Island Department of Education South Carolina Department of Education South Dakota Department of Education Utah State Office of Education Virginia Department of Education West Virginia Department of Education Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction B. One Waiver To Extend the Period of Availability of Funds Received Under Section 1003(g) of the ESEA and Included in the Consolidated Grant Funds for Insular Areas Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA (20 U.S.C. 1225(b)). Waiver Applicant: Virgin Islands Department of Education C. One Waiver To Extend the Period of Availability of Funds for State Assessments and Related Activities Awarded Under Section 6113(b) of the ESEA Provision waived: Tydings Amendment, section 421(b) of GEPA (20 U.S.C. 1225(b)). Waiver Applicant: North Dakota Department of Public Instruction D. Three Waivers To Carry Over SIG Funds To Allow States To Award Funds to LEAs Through a Competition To Be Conducted During the 2015-2016 School Year Provision waived: Section 1003(g) of the ESEA. Waiver Applicants: Alaska Department of Education and Early Development Rhode Island Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Utah State Office of Education III. Waiver of SIG Requirements One Waiver Granting an LEA Additional Time To Meet Teacher and Principal Evaluation Requirements Provision waived: Section I.A.2(d)(1)(i)(B) of the SIG final requirements (75 FR 66363). Waiver Applicant: Washington Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction Description of Waiver: Allowed the State to permit an LEA that was implementing the transformation model during the 2013-2014 school year with SIG funds, which required development and implementation of a teacher and principal evaluation system, to have additional time to meet the teacher and principal evaluation requirement in a [[Page 46802]] school that was not able to do so that year. IV. Waivers Allowing SEAs To Approve Schools or LEAs Identified as in Need of Improvement To Become SES Providers Five Waivers To Permit SEAs To Approve a School or LEA Identified for Improvement, Corrective Action, or Restructuring To Serve as an SES Provider Provisions waived: 34 CFR 200.47(b)(1)(iv)(A) and (B). Waiver Applicants: Iowa Department of Education Montana Office of Public Instruction North Dakota Office of Public Instruction Washington Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction Wyoming Department of Education Description of Waiver: To permit State to approve a school or LEA identified for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring to serve as an SES provider for the 2015-2016 school years. V. Waivers of Requirements Related to State Academic Standards and Assessments A. Four Waivers Allowing Substitution of Standards or Assessments Provisions waived: Section 1111(b)(1)(B) and (3)(C)(i) of the ESEA. Waiver Applicants: Hawaii State Department of Education New Mexico Public Education Department Description of Waiver: One-year waiver for the 2014-2015 school year of the statutory and regulatory requirements under Title I, Part A of the ESEA that required the State to apply the same academic achievement standards, and used the same academic assessments, for all public school children in the State. Waiver Applicant: New Jersey Department of Education Description of Waiver: One-year waiver for the 2014-2015 school year of the statutory and regulatory requirements under Title I, Part A of the ESEA so that New Jersey could use, with respect to a student who was not yet enrolled in high school but who took advanced, high school level mathematics coursework and the corresponding advanced, high school level assessment, the student's score on that assessment for Federal accountability purposes for the grade in which the student was enrolled. Waiver Applicant: Oklahoma State Department of Education Description of Waiver: One-year waiver for the 2014-2015 school year of the statutory and regulatory requirements under Title I, Part A of the ESEA so that Oklahoma could use, with respect to a student who was not yet enrolled in high school but who took advanced, high school level mathematics coursework and the corresponding advanced, high school level assessment, that student's score on that assessment for Federal accountability purposes for the grade in which the student was enrolled. B. Six Waivers of Requirements Related to Reporting Assessment Results or Accountability Determinations Provision waived: Section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II)(cc) of the ESEA. Waiver Applicant: California Department of Education Description of Waiver: Allowed California to exclude the achievement of students with the most significant cognitive disabilities who participated in the field tests in the 2014-2015 school year from the calculation of performance against AMOs for a school or LEA in which such students were enrolled. Provision waived: Section 1111(b)(3)(C)(xii) of the ESEA. Waiver Applicant: California Department of Education Description of Waiver: The waiver permitted California and its LEAs to refrain from producing or providing individual student interpretive, descriptive, and diagnostic reports that included information regarding achievement on State assessments for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities who participated in the field tests in the 2014- 2015 school year. Provision waived: Section 1111(b)(3)(C)(xii) of the ESEA. Waiver Applicant: Hawaii State Department of Education Description of Waiver: Waived the requirement to provide individual student interpretive, descriptive, and diagnostic reports that included information regarding achievement on State assessments to parents, teachers, and principals as soon as it was practically possible after an assessment was given. Provisions waived: Section 1111(h) and (b)(2)(C)(v)(II) of the ESEA. Waiver Applicant: Mississippi Department of Education Description of Waiver: Waiver approved accountability flexibility under ESEA flexibility with respect to Armstrong Middle School and Starkville High School. Provisions waived: Section 1111(h)(1)(C)(i) and (2)(B) of the ESEA. Waiver Applicant: California Department of Education Description of Waiver: Permitted California and its LEAs to refrain from including the results of students with the most significant cognitive disabilities who participated in the field tests in the 2014- 2015 school year in reporting student achievement on State and local report cards. VI. AMAO 3 Determinations--AMAO Determinations Fourteen Waivers of the Requirement To Make AMAO 3 Determinations One-year waiver of the achievement component of AMAO 3 to permit LEAs receiving Title III subgrants that did not have assessment data to demonstrate they met the AMO component of AMAO 3 for the 2014-2015 school year due to the transition to new assessments to continue the same Title III interventions in the 2015-2016 school year that they implemented in the 2014-2015 school year. Provision waived: Section 3122(a)(3)(A)(iii) of the ESEA. Waiver Applicants: Arizona Department of Education Connecticut State Department of Education Delaware Department of Education Florida Department of Education Georgia Department of Education Idaho State Department of Education Indiana Department of Education Montana Office of Public Instruction Oregon Department of Education Rhode Island Department of Education South Carolina Department of Education South Dakota Department of Education Utah State Office of Education Washington Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction VII. Waivers Allowing Flexibility To Support School Improvement Two Waivers of State-Level Reservations To Support School Improvement Waivers related to State-level reservations to support school improvement, allowing SEAs flexibility to distribute funds to LEAs for use in priority and focus schools. The required reservation was not waived; the waiver merely permitted an SEA to distribute the funds to schools that were not identified for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring. [[Page 46803]] Provision waived: Section 1003(a) of the ESEA. Waiver Applicants: Texas Education Agency Virginia Department of Education VIII. Waivers of the Requirement To Make AYP Determinations Five Waivers of the Requirement To Make AYP Determinations Based on Assessment Results One-year waiver of the statutory and regulatory requirements under Title I, Part A of the ESEA that required an LEA and an SEA, respectively, to use the results from the State's academic assessments to make AYP determinations for schools and LEAs. Provisions waived: Section 1116(a)(1)(A) and (c)(1)(A) of the ESEA. Waiver Applicants: California Department of Education Montana Office of Public Instruction North Dakota Department of Public Instructions Vermont Agency of Education Washington Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction IX. Waivers Allowing SEAs To Carry Out Significant Education Reforms Six Waivers Allowing LEAs To Carry Out Significant Education Reforms To Improve Student Achievement Waivers to carry out significant education reforms to improve student achievement for school year 2015-2016. Provisions waived: Sections 1113(a)(3)-(4) and (c)(1), 1114(a)(1), 1116(b) (except (b)(13)) and (c)(7), 2141(a), and 6123(b)(1), (d)(2), and (e)(1) of the ESEA. Waiver Applicants: Fresno Unified School District--California Office of Reform Education (CORE) Los Angeles Unified School District--CORE Long Beach Unified School District--CORE Oakland Unified School District--CORE Santa Ana Unified School District--CORE San Francisco Unified School District--CORE X. Waivers Authorizing SEAs To Waive the Carryover Limitation Two Waivers Authorizing SEAs To Waive the Carryover Limitation for LEAs Waivers authorizing SEAs to waive the carryover limitation for an LEA that needed an additional waiver beyond what the SEA was otherwise authorized to grant. Provision waived: Section 1127(b) of the ESEA. Waiver Applicant: Michigan Department of Education Description of Waiver: One-year waiver allowed Michigan to grant five LEAs a waiver of the carryover limitation with respect to FY 2013 Title I, Part A funds even if the LEA received a carryover waiver of either its FY 2011 or FY 2012 Title I, Part A funds from the State. Waiver Applicant: Washington Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction Description of Waiver: One-year waiver allowed Washington to grant specific LEAs a waiver of the carryover limitation with respect to unexpended FY 2014 Title I, Part A funds even if an LEA received a carryover waiver of either its FY 2012 or FY 2013 Title I, Part A funds from the State. XI. Waiver Regarding Public School Choice Notice One Waiver Regarding Notification of Public School Choice Waived the requirement for an LEA to provide parents of eligible students with notice as to their public school choice options at least 14 days before the start of the school year. This waiver applied only to the notice required for parents of children attending the three Title I schools that either were newly identified for improvement for the 2015-2016 school year or that could have exited improvement, corrective action, or restructuring based on the assessments administered in the 2014-2015 school year, but did not. Provisions waived: Section 1116(b)(1)(E)(i) of the ESEA and 34 CFR 200.37(b)(4)(iv). Waiver Applicant: Wyoming Department of Education XII. Waiver Allowing Flexibility in the Use of Funds Reserved for State Award Programs One Waiver Allowing Flexibility in the Use of Funds Reserved for State Award Programs Waiver allowed funds reserved for State awards programs to go to any reward school and extended the period of availability of Wisconsin's FY 2013 Title I school rewards programs allocation until September 30, 2016. Provision waived: Section 1117(b)(1)(B) of the ESEA. Waiver Applicant: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction XIII. Waiver Relating to Highly Qualified Teachers A. One Waiver Allowing Flexibility Regarding the Definition of ``Highly Qualified Teacher'' A waiver allowing, through the 2018-2019 school year, New Mexico's LEAs to apply to use the term ``highly qualified teacher'' to refer to a teacher who received a summative rating of ``effective,'' ``highly effective,'' or ``exemplary'' and, accordingly, has earned at least 50 percent of the possible student achievement measures in New Mexico's teacher evaluation and support system, in lieu of meeting requirements in section 9101(23)(C)(ii) of the ESEA regarding subject-matter expertise. Provision waived: Section 9101(23)(C)(ii) of the ESEA. Waiver Applicant: New Mexico Public Education Department Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System at: www.thefederalregister.org/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well as other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the site. You may also access documents of the Department published in the Federal Register by using the article search feature at: www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published by the Department. Dated: October 3, 2017. Jason Botel, Acting Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education. [FR Doc. 2017-21619 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 193 / Friday, October 6, 2017 / Notices 46799
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you Telephone: (202) 260–2221 or by email: In addition to waiving the 10
can view this document, as well as all Kia.Weems@ed.gov. provisions listed above, the Department
other documents of this Department If you use a telecommunications granted three optional waivers to 43
published in the Federal Register, in device for the deaf (TDD) or a text States under ESEA flexibility related to
text or Portable Document Format telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay the following:
(PDF). To use PDF you must have Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877– 1. 21st Century Community Learning
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is 8339. Centers (21st CCLC) requirements,
available free at the site. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 2015, allowing SEAs flexibility to permit
You may also access documents of the the Department granted waivers under community learning centers to use 21st
Department published in the Federal ESEA flexibility to 43 States under the CCLC funds to support expanded
Register by using the article search waiver authority in section 9401 of the learning time during the school day in
feature at: www.federalregister.gov. ESEA, in exchange for rigorous and addition to activities during non-school
Specifically, through the advanced comprehensive State-developed plans hours or periods when school is not in
search feature at this site, you can limit designed to improve student academic session;
your search to documents published by achievement and increase the quality of 2. Requirements to make adequate
the Department. instruction. An additional 93 waivers yearly progress (AYP) determinations;
that were not part of ESEA flexibility and
Dated: October 3, 2017.
also were granted under the waiver 3. Requirements pertaining to Title I,
Jason Botel, Part A within-district allocations;
authority in section 9401 of the ESEA.
Acting Assistant Secretary for Elementary and b. Forty-five waivers extending the
Secondary Education. We granted:
a. Ten waivers under ESEA flexibility period in which funds were available
[FR Doc. 2017–21616 Filed 10–5–17; 8:45 am] for obligation: 40 waivers for school
to each of 43 States granting flexibility
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
from ESEA requirements to improve improvement activities, one waiver for
student academic achievement and Consolidated Grant funds for Insular
increase the quality of instruction: Areas, one waiver for State assessment
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 1. Allowing SEAs flexibility to select activities, and three waivers extending
one of three options for setting new the period for SIG carryover funds;
Notice of Waivers Granted Under c. One waiver granting LEAs
Section 9401 of the Elementary and ambitious, but achievable annual
measurable objectives (AMOs); additional time to meet teacher and
Secondary Education Act of 1965, as principal evaluation requirements for
Amended 2. Allowing flexibility in
implementation of school improvement cohort 5 SIG schools;
AGENCY: Office of Elementary and requirements to relieve local d. Five waivers allowing SEAs to
Secondary Education, Department of educational agencies (LEAs) of the approve schools or LEAs identified as in
Education. requirement to identify schools for need of improvement to become
improvement, corrective action, or supplemental educational services (SES)
ACTION: Notice.
restructuring, as appropriate, and to take providers;
SUMMARY: In this notice, we announce certain improvement actions in e. Ten waivers of requirements
the waivers that the U.S. Department of identified schools; pertaining to State academic standards
Education (Department) granted during 3. Allowing flexibility in or assessments: Four waivers allowing
calendar year 2015 under the waiver implementation of LEA improvement substitution of standards or assessments
authority in section 9401 of the requirements to relieve SEAs of the and six waivers exempting SEAs or
Elementary and Secondary Education requirement to identify LEAs for LEAs from reporting assessment or
Act of 1965, as amended by the No improvement or corrective action, as accountability determinations;
Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (ESEA), appropriate, and to take certain f. Fourteen waivers of the third of
including waivers related to flexibilities improvement actions for identified three annual measureable achievement
granted to States in exchange for State- LEAs; objectives (AMAOs 3) under Title III,
led reforms (ESEA flexibility). 4. Granting flexibility for rural LEAs; due to lack of assessment data in the
5. Permitting LEAs to operate a 2014–2015 school year;
The ESEA requires that the
schoolwide program in a priority school g. Two waivers allowing SEAs
Department publish in the Federal
or a focus school that does not meet the flexibility to distribute section 1003(a)
Register, and disseminate to interested
40 percent poverty threshold and is funds to LEAs for use in priority and
parties, a notice of its decision to grant
implementing a schoolwide focus schools;
a waiver of statutory or regulatory h. Five waivers of the requirement to
requirements under the ESEA. Between intervention;
6. Allowing SEAs flexibility to make AYP determinations;
2011 and 2016, the Department granted i. Six waivers allowing LEAs to carry
more than 800 waivers of statutory or distribute school improvement funds to
LEAs for use in priority and focus out significant education reforms to
regulatory requirements to State improve student achievement;
educational agencies (SEAs) but schools;
7. Allowing funds reserved for State j. Two waivers authorizing an SEA to
neglected to comply with the ESEA’s waive the carryover limitation for an
awards program to go to any reward
publication and dissemination LEA that needs an additional waiver;
school;
requirements. This notice is intended to
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
8. Relating to highly qualified teacher k. One waiver of the requirement to
fulfill the Department’s obligation to (HQT) improvement plan requirements; provide parents notice of public school
publicize its waiver decisions by 9. Relating to limitations on the choice options at least 14 days before
identifying the waivers granted during transferability of certain funds; and the start of the school year;
each calendar year. 10. Permitting SEAs flexibility to l. One waiver pertaining to school
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kia award School Improvement Grant (SIG) support and recognition allowing
Weems, U.S. Department of Education, funds to an LEA to implement one of flexibility in the use of funds reserved
400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room the four SIG models in any priority for State awards program to go to any
3W341, Washington, DC 20202. school. reward school; and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:40 Oct 05, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM 06OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_46992/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 193 / Friday, October 6, 2017 / Notices 46803
Provision waived: Section 1003(a) of Waiver Applicant: XIII. Waiver Relating to Highly
the ESEA. Qualified Teachers
• Michigan Department of Education
Waiver Applicants:
A. One Waiver Allowing Flexibility
• Texas Education Agency Description of Waiver: One-year
Regarding the Definition of ‘‘Highly
• Virginia Department of Education waiver allowed Michigan to grant five
LEAs a waiver of the carryover Qualified Teacher’’
VIII. Waivers of the Requirement To limitation with respect to FY 2013 Title A waiver allowing, through the 2018–
Make AYP Determinations I, Part A funds even if the LEA received 2019 school year, New Mexico’s LEAs to
Five Waivers of the Requirement To a carryover waiver of either its FY 2011 apply to use the term ‘‘highly qualified
Make AYP Determinations Based on or FY 2012 Title I, Part A funds from the teacher’’ to refer to a teacher who
Assessment Results State. received a summative rating of
One-year waiver of the statutory and Waiver Applicant: ‘‘effective,’’ ‘‘highly effective,’’ or
regulatory requirements under Title I, ‘‘exemplary’’ and, accordingly, has
• Washington Office of the earned at least 50 percent of the possible
Part A of the ESEA that required an LEA Superintendent of Public Instruction
and an SEA, respectively, to use the student achievement measures in New
results from the State’s academic Description of Waiver: One-year Mexico’s teacher evaluation and support
assessments to make AYP waiver allowed Washington to grant system, in lieu of meeting requirements
determinations for schools and LEAs. specific LEAs a waiver of the carryover in section 9101(23)(C)(ii) of the ESEA
Provisions waived: Section limitation with respect to unexpended regarding subject-matter expertise.
1116(a)(1)(A) and (c)(1)(A) of the ESEA. FY 2014 Title I, Part A funds even if an Provision waived: Section
Waiver Applicants: LEA received a carryover waiver of 9101(23)(C)(ii) of the ESEA.
• California Department of Education either its FY 2012 or FY 2013 Title I, Waiver Applicant:
• Montana Office of Public Instruction Part A funds from the State. • New Mexico Public Education
• North Dakota Department of Public XI. Waiver Regarding Public School
Department
Instructions Choice Notice Electronic Access to This Document:
• Vermont Agency of Education
The official version of this document is
• Washington Office of the One Waiver Regarding Notification of the document published in the Federal
Superintendent of Public Instruction Public School Choice Register. Free internet access to the
IX. Waivers Allowing SEAs To Carry Waived the requirement for an LEA to official edition of the Federal Register
Out Significant Education Reforms provide parents of eligible students with and the Code of Federal Regulations is
notice as to their public school choice available via the Federal Digital System
Six Waivers Allowing LEAs To Carry
options at least 14 days before the start at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
Out Significant Education Reforms To
of the school year. This waiver applied can view this document, as well as other
Improve Student Achievement
only to the notice required for parents documents of this Department
Waivers to carry out significant of children attending the three Title I published in the Federal Register, in
education reforms to improve student schools that either were newly text or Portable Document Format
achievement for school year 2015–2016. identified for improvement for the (PDF). To use PDF you must have
Provisions waived: Sections Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
2015–2016 school year or that could
1113(a)(3)–(4) and (c)(1), 1114(a)(1), available free at the site.
have exited improvement, corrective
1116(b) (except (b)(13)) and (c)(7), You may also access documents of the
action, or restructuring based on the
2141(a), and 6123(b)(1), (d)(2), and (e)(1) Department published in the Federal
assessments administered in the 2014–
of the ESEA. Register by using the article search
2015 school year, but did not.
Waiver Applicants: feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
• Fresno Unified School District— Provisions waived: Section
Specifically, through the advanced
California Office of Reform Education 1116(b)(1)(E)(i) of the ESEA and 34 CFR
search feature at this site, you can limit
(CORE) 200.37(b)(4)(iv).
your search to documents published by
• Los Angeles Unified School District— Waiver Applicant: the Department.
CORE • Wyoming Department of Education
• Long Beach Unified School District— Dated: October 3, 2017.
CORE XII. Waiver Allowing Flexibility in the Jason Botel,
• Oakland Unified School District— Use of Funds Reserved for State Award Acting Assistant Secretary for Elementary and
CORE Programs Secondary Education.
• Santa Ana Unified School District— [FR Doc. 2017–21619 Filed 10–5–17; 8:45 am]
CORE One Waiver Allowing Flexibility in the
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
• San Francisco Unified School Use of Funds Reserved for State Award
District—CORE Programs
X. Waivers Authorizing SEAs To Waive Waiver allowed funds reserved for DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
the Carryover Limitation State awards programs to go to any
reward school and extended the period Bonneville Power Administration
Two Waivers Authorizing SEAs To
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
of availability of Wisconsin’s FY 2013
Waive the Carryover Limitation for LEAs Title I school rewards programs Availability of the Bonneville
Waivers authorizing SEAs to waive allocation until September 30, 2016. Purchasing Instructions (BPI) and
the carryover limitation for an LEA that Bonneville Financial Assistance
Provision waived: Section Instructions (BFAI)
needed an additional waiver beyond 1117(b)(1)(B) of the ESEA.
what the SEA was otherwise authorized AGENCY: Bonneville Power
Waiver Applicant:
to grant. Administration (BPA), DOE.
Provision waived: Section 1127(b) of • Wisconsin Department of Public
ACTION: Notice of document availability.
the ESEA. Instruction
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:40 Oct 05, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM 06OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_46992/page/5.svg)
Document Created: 2017-10-06 00:09:00
Document Modified: 2017-10-06 00:09:00
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice. | |
| Contact | Kia Weems, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 3W341, Washington, DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 260-2221 or by email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 46799 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR