82 FR 47469 - Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of New Shipper Review; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 196 (October 12, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 196 (October 12, 2017)
| Page Range | 47469-47471 | |
| FR Document | 2017-22071 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 196 (Thursday, October 12, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 47469-47471] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-22071] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-848] Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of New Shipper Review; 2015-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On June 7, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review and intent to rescind the new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on freshwater crawfish tail meat from the People's Republic of China (PRC). The period of review (POR) for the administrative review and aligned new shipper review is September 1, 2015, through August 31, 2016. Based on our analysis of the comments received, the Department has made changes to the margin calculations for the final results of the administrative review. The Department continues to find that Jingzhou Tianhe Aquatic Products, Ltd.'s (Jingzhou Tianhe) single sale made to the United States during the POR was not bona fide and, therefore, is rescinding the new shipper review with respect to Jingzhou Tianhe. DATES: Applicable October 12, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Hansen or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3683 or (202) 482-1690, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 7, 2017, the Department published the preliminary results of the administrative review and intent to rescind the new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on freshwater crawfish tail meat from the People's Republic of China (the PRC) \1\ and invited interested parties to comment. On July 14, 2017, Hubei Nature Agriculture Industry Co., Ltd. (Hubei Nature) timely submitted its case brief in the administrative review and, on July 19, 2017, the Crawfish Processors Alliance \2\ (the petitioners) timely [[Page 47470]] submitted its rebuttal brief. No party submitted comments concerning the Department's preliminary intent to rescind the new shipper review of Jingzhou Tianhe. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Rescission of Review in Part, and Preliminary Intent to Rescind New Shipper Review; 2015-2016, 82 FR 26435 (June 7, 2017), and accompanying Decision Memorandum (Preliminary Decision Memorandum) (collectively, Preliminary Results). \2\ The Crawfish Processors Alliance consists of the following firms: A&S Crawfish; Acadiana Fishermen's Cooperative; Arnaudville Seafood Plant; Atchafalaya Crawfish Processors; Atchafalaya Crawfish Processing, L.L.C.; Bayou Land Seafood, LLC; Bieber Farms Crawfish, Inc.; Blanchard's Seafood, Inc.; Bonanza Crawfish Farm, Inc.; CJL Enterprise, Inc. d/b/a C.J.'s; Cajun Central, Inc.; Cajun Seafood Distributor, Inc.; Catahoula Crawfish, Inc.; Choplin Seafood; Clearwater Crawfish; Crawfish Enterprises, Inc.; Dugas Seafood aka Carl's Seafood; Toups Crawfish, L.L.C.; Harvestime Seafood; Harvey's Seafood; Louisiana Seafood Co.; Louisiana Premium Seafood; L.T. West, Inc.; Phillips Seafood, L.L.C.; Prairie Cajun Wholesale Distributors; Randol, Inc. aka Randol's Seafood and Restaurant; Riceland Crawfish, Inc. aka Beaucoup Crawfish; Seafood International, Inc.; Sylvester's Crawfish; and Teche Valley Seafood. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We conducted these reviews in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) and 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the antidumping duty order is freshwater crawfish tail meat, which is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 1605.40.10.10, 1605.40.10.90, 0306.19.00.10, and 0306.29.00.00. On February 10, 2012, the Department added HTSUS classification number 0306.29.01.00 to the scope description pursuant to a request by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). While the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Review of Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic of China; 2015-2016,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rescission of New Shipper Review As discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we preliminarily found that the sale made by Jingzhou Tianhe was not bona fide.\4\ We received no comments concerning this finding. Because the non-bona fide sale at issue was the only sale of subject merchandise that Jingzhou Tianhe made to the United States during the POR, we are rescinding the new shipper review of this company. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4 and 5; see also Memorandum, ``New Shipper Review of Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic of China--Bona Fides Analysis of Jingzhou Tianhe Aquatic Products Co., Ltd.'s Sale,'' dated June 1, 2017. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in these reviews are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised is attached as an Appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the public via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on comments received from interested parties and further review of the record, the Department revised its calculation of the surrogate value for non-refrigerated inland freight expenses.\5\ This revision changed the weighted-average dumping margin results for Hubei Nature and, therefore, the rate applied to the non-selected, separate rate company, Xiping Opeck Food Co., Ltd. (Xiping Opeck). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Separate Rate for a Non-Selected Company Xiping Opeck is the only exporter of crawfish tail meat from the PRC that demonstrated its eligibility for a separate rate which was not selected for individual examination in this review. As in the Preliminary Results, the Department has calculated a rate for the mandatory respondent Yancheng Hi-King Agriculture Developing Co., Ltd. (Yancheng Hi-King) that is zero and a rate for the mandatory respondent Hubei Nature that is not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. Therefore, in accordance with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act and its prior practice, the Department has assigned Hubei Nature's calculated rate (i.e., 3.81 percent) as the separate rate for the non- examined separate rate exporter, Xiping Opeck, for these final results.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ For more details on our methodology in selecting a rate for a non-examined separate rate exporter, see the ``Separate Rates'' section of the Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRC-Wide Entity As stated in the Preliminary Results, because no party requested a review of the PRC-wide entity in this review, the entity is not under review and the entity's rate is not subject to change (i.e., 223.01 percent).\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic of China; Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 68 FR 19504 (April 21, 2003). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of the Administrative Review For the final results of the administrative review, we determine that the following percentage weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period September 1, 2015, through August 31, 2016: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Producer/exporter margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hubei Nature Agriculture Industry Co., Ltd.............. 3.81 Xiping Opeck Food Co., Ltd.............................. 3.81 Yancheng Hi-King Agriculture Developing Co., Ltd........ 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by these reviews. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we have calculated importer-specific (or customer-specific) assessment rates for merchandise subject to these reviews. For these final results, we divided the total dumping margins (calculated as the difference between normal value and export price) for each of the respondents' importers or customers by the total number of kilograms the exporter sold to that importer or customer. We will direct CBP to assess the resulting per-kilogram dollar amount against each kilogram of merchandise in each of that importer's/customer's entries during the review period. For entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies individually examined during the administrative review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of the administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or [[Page 47471]] withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise exported by the companies listed above, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in the final results of the administrative review for each exporter as listed above, except if the rate is zero or de minimis, then no cash deposit will be required for that exporter; (2) for previously investigated companies not listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the investigation; (3) for all other PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 223.01 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC entity that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this proceeding within five days after public announcement of the final results in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing these final results of administrative and new shipper reviews in accordance with sections 751(a)(1), 751(a)(2)(B)(iii), 751(a)(3), 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 351.214. Dated: October 5, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum: I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Surrogate Country V. Separate Rates VI. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Calculation of Surrogate Value for Non-Refrigerated Inland Freight Expenses Comment 2: Selection of Financial Information to Value Factory Overhead, Selling, General & Administrative Expenses, and Profit VII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-22071 Filed 10-11-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 196 / Thursday, October 12, 2017 / Notices 47469
location of the hearing two days before Notification to Interested Parties Department) published the preliminary
the scheduled date. This determination is issued and results of the administrative review and
published in accordance with sections intent to rescind the new shipper review
Postponement of Final Determination
733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 of the antidumping duty order on
and Extension of Provisional Measures
CFR 351.205(c). freshwater crawfish tail meat from the
Section 735(a)(2) of the Act provides People’s Republic of China (PRC). The
that a final determination may be Dated: October 4, 2017. period of review (POR) for the
postponed until not later than 135 days Gary Taverman, administrative review and aligned new
after the date of the publication of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping shipper review is September 1, 2015,
preliminary determination if, in the and Countervailing Duty Operations, through August 31, 2016. Based on our
event of an affirmative preliminary performing the non-exclusive functions and analysis of the comments received, the
determination, a request for such duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Department has made changes to the
postponement is made by exporters who margin calculations for the final results
account for a significant proportion of Appendix I of the administrative review. The
exports of the subject merchandise, or in Scope of the Investigation Department continues to find that
the event of a negative preliminary Jingzhou Tianhe Aquatic Products,
determination, a request for such The scope of this investigation covers all
forms and sizes of silicon metal, including
Ltd.’s (Jingzhou Tianhe) single sale
postponement is made by the petitioner. silicon metal powder. Silicon metal contains made to the United States during the
Section 351.210(e)(2) of the at least 85.00 percent but less than 99.99 POR was not bona fide and, therefore,
Department’s regulations requires that a percent silicon, and less than 4.00 percent is rescinding the new shipper review
request by exporters for postponement iron, by actual weight. Semiconductor grade with respect to Jingzhou Tianhe.
of the final determination be silicon (merchandise containing at least DATES: Applicable October 12, 2017.
accompanied by a request for extension 99.99 percent silicon by actual weight and
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
of provisional measures from a four- classifiable under Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) Bryan Hansen or Minoo Hatten, AD/
month period to a period not more than CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
six months in duration. subheading 2804.61.0000) is excluded from
the scope of this investigation. and Compliance, International Trade
On September 6, 2017, pursuant to 19 Silicon metal is currently classifiable Administration, U.S. Department of
CFR 351.210(e), Palmyra do Brasil under subheadings 2804.69.1000 and Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
requested that the Department postpone 2804.69.5000 of the HTSUS. While HTSUS NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
the final determination and that numbers are provided for convenience and (202) 482–3683 or (202) 482–1690,
provisional measures be extended to a customs purposes, the written description of respectively.
period not to exceed six months.13 In the scope remains dispositive.
accordance with section 735(a)(2)(A) of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Appendix II
the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(2)(ii), Background
because: (1) The preliminary List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
determination is affirmative; (2) the Decision Memorandum On June 7, 2017, the Department
requesting exporter accounts for a I. Summary published the preliminary results of the
significant proportion of exports of the II. Background administrative review and intent to
subject merchandise; and (3) no III. Name Change for Dow Corning Silicio do rescind the new shipper review of the
compelling reasons for denial exist, the Brasil Indústria e Comércio Ltda. antidumping duty order on freshwater
IV. Period of Investigation crawfish tail meat from the People’s
Department is postponing the final V. Scope Comments
determination and extending the Republic of China (the PRC) 1 and
VI. Application of Facts Available and Use of invited interested parties to comment.
provisional measures from a four-month Adverse Facts Available
period to a period not greater than six A. Application of Facts Available
On July 14, 2017, Hubei Nature
months. Accordingly, the Department B. Use of Adverse Inference for LIASA Agriculture Industry Co., Ltd. (Hubei
will make its final determination no C. Preliminary Estimated Weighted- Nature) timely submitted its case brief
later than 135 days after the date of Average Dumping Margin Based on AFA in the administrative review and, on
publication of this preliminary D. Corroboration of Secondary Information July 19, 2017, the Crawfish Processors
determination. VII. Conclusion Alliance 2 (the petitioners) timely
[FR Doc. 2017–22066 Filed 10–11–17; 8:45 am]
International Trade Commission BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
1 See Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the
Notification People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,
In accordance with section 733(f) of Rescission of Review in Part, and Preliminary Intent
the Act, the Department will notify the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE to Rescind New Shipper Review; 2015–2016, 82 FR
International Trade Commission (ITC) of 26435 (June 7, 2017), and accompanying Decision
International Trade Administration Memorandum (Preliminary Decision Memorandum)
its preliminary determination. If the (collectively, Preliminary Results).
final determination is affirmative, the [A–570–848] 2 The Crawfish Processors Alliance consists of the
ITC will determine before the later of following firms: A&S Crawfish; Acadiana
120 days after the date of this Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From Fishermen’s Cooperative; Arnaudville Seafood
the People’s Republic of China: Final Plant; Atchafalaya Crawfish Processors; Atchafalaya
preliminary determination or 45 days
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Crawfish Processing, L.L.C.; Bayou Land Seafood,
after the final determination whether Results of Antidumping Duty LLC; Bieber Farms Crawfish, Inc.; Blanchard’s
these imports are materially injuring, or Administrative Review and Rescission Seafood, Inc.; Bonanza Crawfish Farm, Inc.; CJL
threaten material injury to, the U.S. of New Shipper Review; 2015–2016 Enterprise, Inc. d/b/a C.J.’s; Cajun Central, Inc.;
Cajun Seafood Distributor, Inc.; Catahoula Crawfish,
industry.
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Inc.; Choplin Seafood; Clearwater Crawfish;
International Trade Administration, Crawfish Enterprises, Inc.; Dugas Seafood aka Carl’s
13 See Letter from Palmyra do Brasil, ‘‘Silicon Seafood; Toups Crawfish, L.L.C.; Harvestime
Metal from Brazil/Exporter’s Request for Department of Commerce. Seafood; Harvey’s Seafood; Louisiana Seafood Co.;
Postponement of Final Antidumping SUMMARY: On June 7, 2017, the Louisiana Premium Seafood; L.T. West, Inc.;
Determination’’ dated September 6, 2017. Department of Commerce (the Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:35 Oct 11, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM 12OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_47665/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 196 / Thursday, October 12, 2017 / Notices 47471
withdrawn from warehouse, for shipper reviews in accordance with Background
consumption on or after the publication sections 751(a)(1), 751(a)(2)(B)(iii), This preliminary determination is
date as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) 751(a)(3), 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR made in accordance with section 733(b)
of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise 351.213(h) and 351.214. of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
exported by the companies listed above, Dated: October 5, 2017. (the Act). The Department published the
the cash deposit rate will be the rate Gary Taverman, notice of initiation of this investigation
established in the final results of the on April 4, 2017.1 On August 1, 2017,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Antidumping
administrative review for each exporter and Countervailing Duty Operations, the Department postponed the
as listed above, except if the rate is zero performing the non-exclusive functions and preliminary determination of this
or de minimis, then no cash deposit will duties of the Assistant Secretary for investigation and the revised deadline is
be required for that exporter; (2) for Enforcement and Compliance. now October 4, 2017.2 For a complete
previously investigated companies not description of the events that followed
listed above that have separate rates, the Appendix
the initiation of this investigation, see
cash deposit rate will continue to be the List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and the Preliminary Decision
company-specific rate published for the Decision Memorandum:
Memorandum.3 A list of topics included
investigation; (3) for all other PRC I. Summary
II. Background in the Preliminary Decision
exporters of subject merchandise which Memorandum is included as Appendix
have not been found to be entitled to a III. Scope of the Order
IV. Surrogate Country II to this notice. The Preliminary
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will V. Separate Rates Decision Memorandum is a public
be the PRC-wide rate of 223.01 percent; VI. Discussion of the Issues document and is on file electronically
and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of Comment 1: Calculation of Surrogate Value via Enforcement and Compliance’s
subject merchandise which have not for Non-Refrigerated Inland Freight Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
received their own rate, the cash deposit Expenses Centralized Electronic Service System
rate will be the rate applicable to the Comment 2: Selection of Financial
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
PRC entity that supplied that non-PRC Information to Value Factory Overhead,
Selling, General & Administrative registered users at https://
exporter. access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the
These deposit requirements, when Expenses, and Profit
VII. Recommendation Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of
imposed, shall remain in effect until
[FR Doc. 2017–22071 Filed 10–11–17; 8:45 am]
the main Department of Commerce
further notice.
building. In addition, a complete
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Disclosure version of the Preliminary Decision
We intend to disclose the calculations Memorandum can be accessed directly
performed to parties in this proceeding DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
within five days after public The signed and the electronic versions
announcement of the final results in International Trade Administration of the Preliminary Decision
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Memorandum are identical in content.
[A–602–810] Scope of the Investigation
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder Silicon Metal From Australia: The product covered by this
to importers of their responsibility Preliminary Affirmative Determination investigation is silicon metal from
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Australia. For a complete description of
certificate regarding the reimbursement Preliminary Affirmative Determination the scope of this investigation, see
of antidumping duties prior to of Critical Circumstances, Appendix I.
liquidation of the relevant entries Postponement of Final Determination, Scope Comments
during this review period. Failure to and Extension of Provisional Measures
comply with this requirement could In accordance with the preamble to
result in the Secretary’s presumption AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, the Department’s regulations,4 the
that reimbursement of antidumping International Trade Administration, Initiation Notice set aside a period of
duties occurred and the subsequent Department of Commerce. time for parties to raise issues regarding
assessment of double antidumping SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce product coverage (i.e., scope).5 Certain
duties. (the Department) preliminarily interested parties commented on the
determines that silicon metal from scope of the investigation as it appeared
Notification Regarding Administrative Australia is being, or is likely to be, sold in the Initiation Notice. After evaluating
Protective Orders in the United States at less than fair these comments, the Department
This notice also serves as a reminder value (LTFV). The period of
1 See Silicon Metal from Australia, Brazil, and
to parties subject to administrative investigation (POI) is January 1, 2016,
Norway: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value
protective order (APO) of their through December 31, 2016. Investigations, 82 FR 16352 (April 4, 2017)
responsibility concerning the DATES: Applicable October 12, 2017. (Initiation Notice).
destruction of proprietary information 2 See Silicon Metal from Australia, Brazil, and
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norway: Postponement of Preliminary
disclosed under APO in accordance
Brian Smith or Denisa Ursu, AD/CVD Determinations in the Less-Than-Fair-Value
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement Investigations, 82 FR 35753 (August 1, 2017).
written notification of the return or 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
and Compliance, International Trade
destruction of APO materials or the Preliminary Determination in the Less-Than-
Administration, U.S. Department of
conversion to judicial protective order is Fair-Value Investigation of Silicon Metal from
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue Australia’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
hereby requested. Failure to comply
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision
with the regulations and terms of an Memorandum).
(202) 482–1766 or (202) 482–2285,
APO is a violation subject to sanction. 4 See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties,
We are issuing and publishing these respectively.
Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997).
final results of administrative and new SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 5 See Initiation Notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:35 Oct 11, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM 12OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_47665/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-10-25 10:05:47
Document Modified: 2018-10-25 10:05:47
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable October 12, 2017. | |
| Contact | Bryan Hansen or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3683 or (202) 482-1690, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 47469 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR