82_FR_47670 82 FR 47474 - Glycine From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part; 2015-2016

82 FR 47474 - Glycine From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part; 2015-2016

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 196 (October 12, 2017)

Page Range47474-47475
FR Document2017-22068

On April 7, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on glycine from the People's Republic of China (PRC), covering the period March 1, 2015, through February 29, 2016. We invited interested parties to comment on the preliminary results. We received comments from a domestic interested party, GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc. (GEO), a respondent, Baoding Mantong Fine Chemistry Co., Ltd. (Baoding Mantong) and a U.S. importer, Pharm-Rx Chemical Corporation (Pharm-Rx). As a result of comments filed by the parties, we have determined that the U.S. sale reported by Baoding Mantong is not a bona fide sale and the review should be rescinded with respect to this exporter. The final results remain unchanged from the preliminary results of review with respect to the other respondent, Jizhou City Huayang Chemical Co., Ltd. (Huayang Chemical).

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 196 (Thursday, October 12, 2017) 
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 196 (Thursday, October 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47474-47475]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22068]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-836]


Glycine From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Administrative 
Review, in Part; 2015-2016

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On April 7, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on glycine from the People's Republic of China 
(PRC), covering the period March 1, 2015, through February 29, 2016. We 
invited interested parties to comment on the preliminary results. We 
received comments from a domestic interested party, GEO Specialty 
Chemicals, Inc. (GEO), a respondent, Baoding Mantong Fine Chemistry 
Co., Ltd. (Baoding Mantong) and a U.S. importer, Pharm-Rx Chemical 
Corporation (Pharm-Rx). As a result of comments filed by the parties, 
we have determined that the U.S. sale reported by Baoding Mantong is 
not a bona fide sale and the review should be rescinded with respect to 
this exporter. The final results remain unchanged from the preliminary 
results of review with respect to the other respondent, Jizhou City 
Huayang Chemical Co., Ltd. (Huayang Chemical).

DATES: Applicable October 12, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edythe Artman or Brian Davis, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3931 or (202) 482-7924, 
respectively.

Background

    On April 7, 2017, the Department published its notice of 
preliminary results of review for the administrative review on glycine 
from the PRC in the Federal Register.\1\ A summary of the events that 
occurred since the Department published these results, as well as a 
discussion of the issues raised by parties for this final 
determination, may be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, 
which is hereby adopted by this notice.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Glycine from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, In Part; 2015-2016, 82 FR 
16992 (April 7, 2017) (Preliminary Results).
    \2\ See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary 
for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, on the subject 
of ``Glycine from the People's Republic of China: Issues and 
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Administrative Review 
and Rescission of Review, In Part; 2015-2016'', dated concurrently 
with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The product covered by this antidumping duty order is glycine, 
which is a free-flowing crystalline material, like salt or sugar. 
Glycine is produced at varying levels of purity and is used as a 
sweetener/taste enhancer, a buffering agent, reabsorbable amino acid, 
chemical intermediate, and a metal complexing agent. This proceeding 
includes glycine of all purity levels. Glycine is currently classified 
under subheading 2922.49.4020 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
United States (HTSUS).\3\ Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for 
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the 
merchandise under the order is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ In separate scope rulings, the Department determined that: 
(a) D(-) Phenylglycine Ethyl Dane Salt is outside the scope of the 
order and (b) PRC-glycine exported from India remains the same class 
or kind of merchandise as the PRC-origin glycine imported into 
India. See Notice of Scope Rulings and Anticircumvention Inquiries, 
62 FR 62288 (November 21, 1997) and Glycine from the People's 
Republic of China: Final Partial Affirmative Determination of 
Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 73426 (December 
10, 2012), respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum. A list of the issues raised by parties is attached to this 
notice as Appendix I. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public 
document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and it is available to all parties in the Central 
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. 
In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum 
can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    In Comment 1 of the Issues and Decision Memorandum, the Department 
concluded that the sole U.S. sale reported by Baoding Mantong for the 
period of review was not a bona fide sale. Consequently, we are 
rescinding the review with respect to this company. We made no changes 
to the PRC-wide rate assigned to Pharm-Rx's Chinese supplier, Huayang 
Chemical, as a result of our analysis of the issues.

Final Results of Review

    In the Preliminary Results, we determined that Huayang Chemical 
failed to establish its eligibility for a separate rate and 
preliminarily determined to treat the exporter as part of the 
PRC[hyphen]wide entity.\4\ Because no party requested a review of the 
PRC-wide entity and the Department no longer considers the PRC-wide 
entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative reviews, 
we did not conduct a review of the PRC-wide entity, and the entity's 
rate is not subject to change in this review.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Preliminary Results at 16992-16993.
    \5\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department has determined, 
and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of 
subject merchandise covered

[[Page 47475]]

by this review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions 
to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of 
review. Accordingly, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the entries 
reported by Baoding Mantong without regard to antidumping duties. The 
Department also intends to instruct CBP to liquidate entries of subject 
merchandise from the exporters identified above as being part of the 
PRC-wide entity (including Huayang Chemical) at the PRC-wide rate, 
i.e., 453.79 percent.
    Pursuant to a refinement in the Department's non-market economy 
practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales 
databases submitted by companies individually examined during this 
review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 
the PRC-wide rate.\6\ Additionally, if the Department determines that 
an exporter had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended 
entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that 
exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
    \7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results 
of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of 
the Act: (1) For Baoding Mantong and other previously investigated or 
reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters which are not under review in this 
segment of the proceeding but received a separate rate in a previous 
segment, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-
specific rate published for the most recently-completed period; (2) for 
all PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to 
be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for 
the PRC-wide entity (i.e., 453.79 percent); and (3) for all non-PRC 
exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own 
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC 
exporter(s) that supplied the non-PRC exporter. These cash deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this period of review. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or 
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective 
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and 
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
    We are issuing and publishing these results and this notice in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.

     Dated: October 4, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. List of Issues
III. Background
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Discussion of Interested Party Comments
    Comment 1: Bona Fides of Baoding Mantong's U.S. Sale
    Comment 2: Moot Arguments Concerning Baoding Mantong's Margin 
Calculations
    Comment 3: Assignment of the PRC-Wide Rate to Pharm-Rx Following 
Judicial Review of the Rate
VI. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2017-22068 Filed 10-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

47474 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 196 / Thursday, October 12, 2017 / Notices CPEC’s amendment of its Export DATES: Applicable October 12, 2017. Analysis of Comments Received Trade Certificate of Review results in the All issues raised in the case and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: following membership list: rebuttal briefs by parties to this Edythe Artman or Brian Davis, AD/CVD • Arizona Nut Company, LLC Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and administrative review are addressed in • ARO Pistachios, Inc. Compliance, International Trade the Issues and Decision Memorandum. • Horizon Growers Cooperative, Inc. Administration, U.S. Department of A list of the issues raised by parties is • Keenan Farms, Inc. attached to this notice as Appendix I. Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue • Monarch Nut Company The Issues and Decision Memorandum • Nichols Pistachio NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3931 or (202) 482–7924, is a public document and is on file • Primex Farms, LLC electronically via Enforcement and • Setton Pistachio of Terra Bella, Inc. respectively. Compliance’s Antidumping and • Zymex Industries, Inc. Background Countervailing Duty Centralized No change has been made regarding Electronic Service System (ACCESS). the Export Trade, Export Trade On April 7, 2017, the Department ACCESS is available to registered users Activities or Methods of Operation published its notice of preliminary at https://access.trade.gov and it is covered by the Certificate. results of review for the administrative available to all parties in the Central The amended Certificate of Review is review on glycine from the PRC in the Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main effective from June 15, 2017, the date on Federal Register.1 A summary of the Department of Commerce building. In which the application for an events that occurred since the addition, a complete version of the amendment was deemed submitted. Department published these results, as Issues and Decision Memorandum can well as a discussion of the issues raised be accessed directly at http:// Dated: October 5, 2017. by parties for this final determination, enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. Joseph E. Flynn, may be found in the Issues and Decision The signed and electronic versions of Director, Office of Trade and Economic Memorandum, which is hereby adopted Analysis, International Trade Administration. the Issues and Decision Memorandum by this notice.2 are identical in content. [FR Doc. 2017–21984 Filed 10–11–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P Scope of the Order Changes Since the Preliminary Results The product covered by this In Comment 1 of the Issues and antidumping duty order is glycine, Decision Memorandum, the Department DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE concluded that the sole U.S. sale which is a free-flowing crystalline International Trade Administration material, like salt or sugar. Glycine is reported by Baoding Mantong for the produced at varying levels of purity and period of review was not a bona fide [A–570–836] sale. Consequently, we are rescinding is used as a sweetener/taste enhancer, a buffering agent, reabsorbable amino the review with respect to this Glycine From the People’s Republic of company. We made no changes to the China: Final Results of Antidumping acid, chemical intermediate, and a metal complexing agent. This proceeding PRC-wide rate assigned to Pharm-Rx’s Duty Administrative Review and Chinese supplier, Huayang Chemical, as Rescission of Administrative Review, includes glycine of all purity levels. Glycine is currently classified under a result of our analysis of the issues. in Part; 2015–2016 subheading 2922.49.4020 of the Final Results of Review AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the International Trade Administration, In the Preliminary Results, we United States (HTSUS).3 Although the determined that Huayang Chemical Department of Commerce. HTSUS subheading is provided for failed to establish its eligibility for a SUMMARY: On April 7, 2017, the convenience and customs purposes, the separate rate and preliminarily Department of Commerce (the written description of the merchandise determined to treat the exporter as part Department) published the preliminary under the order is dispositive. of the PRC-wide entity.4 Because no results of the administrative review of party requested a review of the PRC- the antidumping duty order on glycine 1 See Glycine from the People’s Republic of wide entity and the Department no from the People’s Republic of China China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of longer considers the PRC-wide entity as (PRC), covering the period March 1, Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, In Part; an exporter conditionally subject to 2015, through February 29, 2016. We 2015–2016, 82 FR 16992 (April 7, 2017) administrative reviews, we did not invited interested parties to comment on (Preliminary Results). conduct a review of the PRC-wide the preliminary results. We received 2 See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Deputy entity, and the entity’s rate is not subject comments from a domestic interested Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, on the subject of to change in this review.5 party, GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc. ‘‘Glycine from the People’s Republic of China: (GEO), a respondent, Baoding Mantong Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Assessment Rates Fine Chemistry Co., Ltd. (Baoding Results of Administrative Review and Rescission of Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Mantong) and a U.S. importer, Pharm- Review, In Part; 2015–2016’’, dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) Rx Chemical Corporation (Pharm-Rx). Memorandum). and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department As a result of comments filed by the 3 In separate scope rulings, the Department has determined, and CBP shall assess, asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES parties, we have determined that the determined that: (a) D(-) Phenylglycine Ethyl Dane antidumping duties on all appropriate U.S. sale reported by Baoding Mantong Salt is outside the scope of the order and (b) PRC- glycine exported from India remains the same class entries of subject merchandise covered is not a bona fide sale and the review or kind of merchandise as the PRC-origin glycine should be rescinded with respect to this imported into India. See Notice of Scope Rulings 4 See Preliminary Results at 16992–16993. exporter. The final results remain and Anticircumvention Inquiries, 62 FR 62288 5 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement unchanged from the preliminary results (November 21, 1997) and Glycine from the People’s of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Republic of China: Final Partial Affirmative Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and of review with respect to the other Determination of Circumvention of the Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy respondent, Jizhou City Huayang Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 73426 (December Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 Chemical Co., Ltd. (Huayang Chemical). 10, 2012), respectively. FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:35 Oct 11, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM 12OCN1

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 196 / Thursday, October 12, 2017 / Notices 47475 by this review. The Department intends Notification to Importers DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of This notice serves as a final reminder International Trade Administration these final results of review. to importers of their responsibility [A–403–805] Accordingly, we will instruct CBP to under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a liquidate the entries reported by certificate regarding the reimbursement Silicon Metal From Norway: Baoding Mantong without regard to of antidumping duties prior to Preliminary Affirmative Determination antidumping duties. The Department liquidation of the relevant entries of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, also intends to instruct CBP to liquidate during this period of review. Failure to Preliminary Negative Determination of entries of subject merchandise from the comply with this requirement could Critical Circumstances, Preliminary exporters identified above as being part result in the Department’s presumption Determination of No Shipments, of the PRC-wide entity (including that reimbursement of antidumping Postponement of Final Determination, duties occurred and the subsequent and Extension of Provisional Measures Huayang Chemical) at the PRC-wide rate, i.e., 453.79 percent. assessment of double antidumping AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, duties. International Trade Administration, Pursuant to a refinement in the Department’s non-market economy Notification Regarding Administrative Department of Commerce. practice, for entries that were not Protective Order SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce reported in the U.S. sales databases (the Department) preliminarily This notice also serves as a final determines that silicon metal from submitted by companies individually reminder to parties subject to Norway is being, or is likely to be, sold examined during this review, the administrative protective order (APO) of in the United States at less than fair Department will instruct CBP to their responsibility concerning the value (LTFV). The period of liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide return or destruction of proprietary investigation (POI) is January 1, 2016, rate.6 Additionally, if the Department through December 31, 2016. information disclosed under APO in determines that an exporter had no accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), DATES: Applicable October 12, 2017. shipments of the subject merchandise, which continues to govern business FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: any suspended entries that entered proprietary information in this segment Brittany Bauer, AD/CVD Operations, under that exporter’s case number (i.e., of the proceeding. Timely written Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, at that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated International Trade Administration, notification of the return or destruction at the PRC-wide rate.7 U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 of APO materials, or conversion to Cash Deposit Requirements judicial protective order, is hereby Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, requested. Failure to comply with the DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3860. The following cash deposit regulations and terms of an APO is a SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: requirements will be effective for all sanctionable violation. shipments of subject merchandise Background entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, We are issuing and publishing these This preliminary determination is for consumption on or after the results and this notice in accordance made in accordance with section 733(b) publication date of the final results of with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended this administrative review, as provided Act. (the Act). The Department published the by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) Dated: October 4, 2017. notice of initiation of this investigation For Baoding Mantong and other on April 4, 2017.1 On July 26, 2017, the Gary Taverman, previously investigated or reviewed PRC Department postponed the preliminary Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping determination of this investigation, and and non-PRC exporters which are not and Countervailing Duty Operations under review in this segment of the the revised deadline is now October 4, performing the non-exclusive functions and proceeding but received a separate rate 2017.2 For a complete description of the duties of the Assistant Secretary for events that followed the initiation of in a previous segment, the cash deposit Enforcement and Compliance. this investigation, see the Preliminary rate will continue to be the exporter- Appendix I Decision Memorandum.3 A list of topics specific rate published for the most included in the Preliminary Decision recently-completed period; (2) for all List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues Memorandum is included as Appendix PRC exporters of subject merchandise and Decision Memorandum II to this notice. The Preliminary which have not been found to be I. Summary Decision Memorandum is a public entitled to a separate rate, the cash II. List of Issues document and is on file electronically deposit rate will be that for the PRC- III. Background via Enforcement and Compliance’s wide entity (i.e., 453.79 percent); and (3) IV. Scope of the Order Antidumping and Countervailing Duty for all non-PRC exporters of subject V. Discussion of Interested Party Comments merchandise which have not received Comment 1: Bona Fides of Baoding 1 See Silicon Metal From Australia, Brazil, and their own rate, the cash deposit rate will Mantong’s U.S. Sale Norway: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value be the rate applicable to the PRC Comment 2: Moot Arguments Concerning Investigations, 82 FR 16352 (April 4, 2017) (Initiation Notice). asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES exporter(s) that supplied the non-PRC Baoding Mantong’s Margin Calculations 2 See Silicon Metal from Australia, Brazil, and exporter. These cash deposit Comment 3: Assignment of the PRC-Wide Norway: Postponement of Preliminary Rate to Pharm-Rx Following Judicial requirements, when imposed, shall Determinations in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Review of the Rate Investigations, 82 FR 35753 (August 1, 2017). remain in effect until further notice. VI. Recommendation 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for [FR Doc. 2017–22068 Filed 10–11–17; 8:45 am] the Preliminary Determination in the Less-Than- 6 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Fair-Value Investigation of Silicon Metal from Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Norway,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 7 Id. Memorandum). VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:35 Oct 11, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM 12OCN1


Document Created: 2018-10-25 10:06:03
Document Modified: 2018-10-25 10:06:03
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesApplicable October 12, 2017.
ContactEdythe Artman or Brian Davis, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3931 or (202) 482-7924, respectively.
FR Citation82 FR 47474 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR