82_FR_48466 82 FR 48267 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Border Security Technology Consortium

82 FR 48267 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Border Security Technology Consortium

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 199 (October 17, 2017)

Page Range48267-48268
FR Document2017-22442

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 199 (Tuesday, October 17, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48267-48268]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22442]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Border Security Technology Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 22, 2017, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Border Security Technology 
Consortium (``BSTC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Michigan Technology University, Houghton, MI; and TRI-COR 
Industries, Inc., Alexandria, VA, have been added as parties to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and BSTC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On May 30, 2012, BSTC filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 18, 
2012 (77 FR 36292).

[[Page 48268]]

    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 8, 
2017. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on July 25, 2017 (85 FR 34551).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-22442 Filed 10-16-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P



                                                                             Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 17, 2017 / Notices                                               48267

                                                calendar days, made an offer to acquire,                control of defendants, relating to any matters        XIV. PUBLIC INTEREST
                                                expressed an interest in acquiring,                     contained in this Final Judgment; and                 DETERMINATION
                                                entered into negotiations to acquire, or                  2) to interview, either informally or on the
                                                                                                        record, defendants’ officers, employees, or              Entry of this Final Judgment is in the
                                                was contacted or made an inquiry about
                                                                                                        agents, who may have their individual                 public interest. The parties have
                                                acquiring, any interest in the Divestiture              counsel present, regarding such matters. The          complied with the requirements of the
                                                Assets, and shall describe in detail each               interviews shall be subject to the reasonable         Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act,
                                                contact with any such person during                     convenience of the interviewee and without            15 U.S.C. 16, including making copies
                                                that period. Each such affidavit shall                  restraint or interference by defendants.              available to the public of this Final
                                                also include a description of the efforts
                                                                                                           B. Upon the written request of an                  Judgment, the Competitive Impact
                                                defendants have taken to solicit buyers
                                                                                                        authorized representative of the                      Statement, and any comments thereon
                                                for the Divestiture Assets, and to
                                                                                                        Assistant Attorney General in charge of               and the United States’ responses to
                                                provide required information to
                                                                                                        the Antitrust Division, defendants shall              comments. Based upon the record
                                                prospective Acquirers, including the
                                                                                                        submit written reports or response to                 before the Court, which includes the
                                                limitations, if any, on such information.
                                                                                                        written interrogatories, under oath if                Competitive Impact Statement and any
                                                Assuming the information set forth in
                                                                                                        requested, relating to any of the matters             comments and response to comments
                                                the affidavit is true and complete, any
                                                                                                        contained in this Final Judgment as may               filed with the Court, entry of this Final
                                                objection by the United States to
                                                                                                        be requested.                                         Judgment is in the public interest.
                                                information provided by defendants,
                                                                                                           C. No information or documents                     Date:
                                                including limitation on information,
                                                                                                        obtained by the means provided in this                Court approval subject to procedures of
                                                shall be made within fourteen (14)
                                                                                                        section shall be divulged by the United               Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15
                                                calendar days of receipt of such
                                                                                                        States to any person other than an                    U.S.C. 16.
                                                affidavit.
                                                                                                        authorized representative of the                      lllllllllllllllllllll
                                                   B. Within twenty (20) calendar days                  executive branch of the United States,                United States District Judge
                                                of the filing of the Complaint in this                  except in the course of legal proceedings
                                                matter, defendants shall deliver to the                                                                       [FR Doc. 2017–22443 Filed 10–16–17; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                        to which the United States is a party
                                                United States an affidavit that describes               (including grand jury proceedings), or
                                                                                                                                                              BILLING CODE P
                                                in reasonable detail all actions                        for the purpose of securing compliance
                                                defendants have taken and all steps                     with this Final Judgment, or as
                                                defendants have implemented on an                                                                             DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
                                                                                                        otherwise required by law.
                                                ongoing basis to comply with Section                       D. If at the time information or                   Antitrust Division
                                                VIII of this Final Judgment. Defendants                 documents are furnished by defendants
                                                shall deliver to the United States an                   to the United States, defendants                      Notice Pursuant to the National
                                                affidavit describing any changes to the                 represent and identify in writing the                 Cooperative Research and Production
                                                efforts and actions outlined in                         material in any such information or                   Act of 1993—Border Security
                                                defendants’ earlier affidavits filed                    documents to which a claim of                         Technology Consortium
                                                pursuant to this section within fifteen                 protection may be asserted under Rule
                                                (15) calendar days after the change is                  26(c)(1)(G) of the Federal Rules of Civil                Notice is hereby given that, on
                                                implemented.                                            Procedure, and defendants mark each                   September 22, 2017, pursuant to Section
                                                   C. Defendants shall keep all records of              pertinent page of such material,                      6(a) of the National Cooperative
                                                all efforts made to preserve and divest                 ‘‘Subject to claim of protection under                Research and Production Act of 1993,
                                                the Divestiture Assets until one year                   Rule 26(c)(1)(G) of the Federal Rules of              15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’),
                                                after such divestiture has been                         Civil Procedure,’’ then the United States             Border Security Technology Consortium
                                                completed.                                              shall give defendants ten (10) calendar               (‘‘BSTC’’) has filed written notifications
                                                                                                        days notice prior to divulging such                   simultaneously with the Attorney
                                                X. COMPLIANCE INSPECTION                                                                                      General and the Federal Trade
                                                                                                        material in any legal proceeding (other
                                                  A. For the purposes of determining or                 than a grand jury proceeding).                        Commission disclosing changes in its
                                                securing compliance with this Final                                                                           membership. The notifications were
                                                Judgment, or of any related orders such                 XI. NO REACQUISITION                                  filed for the purpose of extending the
                                                as any Hold Separate Stipulation and                      Defendants may not reacquire any                    Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
                                                Order, or of determining whether the                    part of the Divestiture Assets during the             antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
                                                Final Judgment should be modified or                    term of this Final Judgment.                          under specified circumstances.
                                                vacated, and subject to any legally-                                                                          Specifically, Michigan Technology
                                                                                                        XII. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION                        University, Houghton, MI; and TRI–COR
                                                recognized privilege, from time to time
                                                authorized representatives of the United                   This Court retains jurisdiction to                 Industries, Inc., Alexandria, VA, have
                                                States Department of Justice, including                 enable any party to this Final Judgment               been added as parties to this venture.
                                                consultants and other persons retained                  to apply to this Court at any time for                   No other changes have been made in
                                                by the United States, shall, upon written               further orders and directions as may be               either the membership or planned
                                                request of an authorized representative                 necessary or appropriate to carry out or              activity of the group research project.
                                                of the Assistant Attorney General in                    construe this Final Judgment, to modify               Membership in this group research
                                                charge of the Antitrust Division, and on                any of its provisions, to enforce                     project remains open, and BSTC intends
                                                                                                                                                              to file additional written notifications
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                reasonable notice to defendants, be                     compliance, and to punish violations of
                                                permitted:                                              its provisions.                                       disclosing all changes in membership.
                                                                                                                                                                 On May 30, 2012, BSTC filed its
                                                  1) access during defendants’ office hours to          XIII. EXPIRATION OF FINAL
                                                inspect and copy, or at the option of the
                                                                                                                                                              original notification pursuant to Section
                                                                                                        JUDGMENT                                              6(a) of the Act. The Department of
                                                United States, to require defendants to
                                                provide hard copy or electronic copies of, all            Unless this Court grants an extension,              Justice published a notice in the Federal
                                                books, ledgers, accounts, records, data, and            this Final Judgment shall expire ten (10)             Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
                                                documents in the possession, custody, or                years from the date of its entry.                     Act on June 18, 2012 (77 FR 36292).


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:10 Oct 16, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00056   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM   17OCN1


                                                48268                           Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 17, 2017 / Notices

                                                  The last notification was filed with                    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE                                      impartial review of SES performance
                                                the Department on June 8, 2017. A                                                                                    appraisals, bonus recommendations and
                                                notice was published in the Federal                       Membership of the Senior Executive                         pay adjustments. The PRBs will make
                                                Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the                  Service Standing Performance Review                        recommendations regarding the final
                                                Act on July 25, 2017 (85 FR 34551).                       Boards                                                     performance ratings to be assigned, SES
                                                                                                          AGENCY:   Department of Justice.                           bonuses and/or pay adjustments to be
                                                Patricia A. Brink,                                                                                                   awarded.
                                                Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
                                                                                                          ACTION:  Notice of Department of
                                                Division.                                                 Justice’s standing members of the Senior                   FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                          Executive Service Performance Review                       Mary A. Lamary, Director, Human
                                                [FR Doc. 2017–22442 Filed 10–16–17; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                          Boards.                                                    Resources, Justice Management
                                                BILLING CODE P
                                                                                                                                                                     Division, Department of Justice,
                                                                                                          SUMMARY:  The Department of Justice.
                                                                                                                                                                     Washington, DC 20530; (202) 514–4350.
                                                                                                          announces the membership of its 2017
                                                                                                          Senior Executive Service (SES) Standing                    Lee J. Lofthus,
                                                                                                          Performance Review Boards (PRBs). The                      Assistant Attorney General for
                                                                                                          purpose of a PRB is to provide fair and                    Administration.

                                                                                                                   2017 FEDERAL REGISTER
                                                                  Name                                                                              Position title

                                                                                                                Office of the Attorney General—OAG

                                                HUNT, JODY (DETAIL) ..................          CHIEF OF STAFF AND COUNSELOR.
                                                MORRISSEY, BRIAN .....................          COUNSELOR TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
                                                CUTRONA, DANIELLE ...................           SENIOR COUNSELOR.

                                                                                                         Office of the Deputy Attorney General—ODAG

                                                HUR, ROBERT ...............................     PRINCIPAL ASSOCIATE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL.
                                                SWANSON, JAMES .......................          ASSOCIATE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL.
                                                SCHOOLS, SCOTT ........................         ASSOCIATE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL.
                                                GUAHAR, TASHINA .......................         ASSOCIATE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL.
                                                CROWELL, JAMES A .....................          CHIEF OF STAFF/ASSOCIATE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL.
                                                CONNOLLY, ROBERT ...................            DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF SMALL AND DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS UTILIZATION.
                                                GOLDSMITH, ANDREW .................             NATIONAL CRIMINAL DISCOVERY COORDINATOR.
                                                MICHALIC, MARK ..........................       EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND CRISIS RESPONSE COORDINATOR.
                                                GEISE, JOHN .................................   CHIEF, PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT REVIEW UNIT.

                                                                                                       Office of the Associate Attorney General—OASG

                                                PANUCCIO, JESSE ........................        PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
                                                MCARTHUR, ERIC .........................        DEPUTY ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
                                                COX, STEVE ..................................   DEPUTY ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
                                                MURRAY, BRIAN ...........................       DEPUTY ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
                                                FRANCISCO, NOEL .......................         SENIOR ADVISOR.

                                                                                                                Office of the Solicitor General—OSG

                                                WALL, JEFFREY ............................      PRINCIPAL DEPUTY SOLICITOR GEN.
                                                DREEBEN, MICHAEL R .................            DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL.
                                                KNEEDLER, EDWIN S ...................           DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL.
                                                STEWART, MALCOLM L ...............              DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL.

                                                                                                                Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties

                                                WINN, PETER ................................    DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PRIVACY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES.

                                                                                                                      Antitrust Division—ATR

                                                FINCH, ANDREW ...........................       PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL.
                                                NIGRO, BERNARD .........................        DEPUTY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL.
                                                ARMINGTON, ELIZABETH J .........                CHIEF, ECONOMIC REGULATORY SECTION.
                                                BRINK, PATRICIA A .......................       DIRECTOR OF CIVIL ENFORCEMENT.
                                                COHEN, SCOTT .............................      EXECUTIVE OFFICER.
                                                DRENNAN, RONALD .....................           CHIEF, COMPETITION POLICY SECTION.
                                                FAMILANT, NORMAN ....................           CHIEF, ECONOMIC LITIGATION SECTION.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                FOUNTAIN, DOROTHY ..................            SENIOR COUNSEL AND DIRECTOR OF RISK MANAGEMENT.
                                                GREER, TRACY .............................      ATTORNEY ADVISOR.
                                                HOLLAND, CAROLINE ...................           CHIEF COUNSEL FOR COMPETITION POLICY AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS.
                                                LIMARZI, KRISTEN ........................       CHIEF, APPELLATE SECTION.
                                                MUCCHETTI, PETER J ..................           CHIEF, LITIGATION I SECTION.
                                                MAJURE, WILLIAM ROBERT ........                 DIRECTOR OF ECONOMICS.
                                                MARTINO, JEFFREY .....................          CHIEF, NEW YORK FIELD OFFICE.
                                                PETRIZZI, MARIBETH ...................          CHIEF, LITIGATION II SECTION.



                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014     17:10 Oct 16, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00057   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM      17OCN1



Document Created: 2017-10-17 01:11:15
Document Modified: 2017-10-17 01:11:15
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation82 FR 48267 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR