82 FR 4844 - Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Rescission of New Shipper Review; 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 10 (January 17, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 10 (January 17, 2017)
| Page Range | 4844-4846 | |
| FR Document | 2017-00827 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 4844-4846] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-00827] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-601] Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Rescission of New Shipper Review; 2014-2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On July 14, 2016, the Department of Commerce (Department) published the preliminary results of the 28th administrative and new shipper reviews of the antidumping duty order on tapered roller bearings and parts thereof, finished and unfinished (TRBs), from the People's Republic of China (PRC). The period of review (POR) is June 1, 2014, through May 31, 2015. After analyzing the comments received, we made no changes to the margin calculations in the administrative review and we are rescinding the new shipper review (NSR). The final weighted- average dumping margins for the reviewed firms are listed below in the section entitled ``Final Results of the Review.'' DATES: Effective January 17, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Blaine Wiltse or Manuel Rey, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6345 or (202) 482-5518, respectively. Background These final results of administrative review cover four exporters of the subject merchandise, Changshan Peer Bearing Co. Ltd. (CPZ/SKF), Haining Nice Flourish Auto Parts Co., Ltd. (Nice Flourish), Roci International (HK) Limited (Roci), and Yantai CMC Bearing Co., Ltd. (Yantai CMC). The Department selected CPZ/SKF and Yantai CMC as mandatory respondents for individual examination; however, we subsequently found that Yantai CMC does not qualify for a separate rate. The NSR covers Shandong Bolong Bearing Co., Ltd. (Bolong). On July 14, 2016, the Department published the Preliminary Results.\1\ In the Preliminary Results, we found that Bolong's sale to the United States is not bona fide, as required by section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and, therefore, we indicated that we intended to rescind the NSR. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results, Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Preliminary Rescission of New Shipper Review; 2014-2015, 81 FR 45455 (July 14, 2016) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In August 2016, we received case briefs from the Timken Company (the petitioner), Bolong and Yantai CMC. In September 2016, we received rebuttal briefs from the petitioner and CPZ/SKF. In October 2016, the Department held a public hearing in the administrative review at the request of the petitioner. In November 2016, the Department extended the deadline for the final results by 60 days to January 10, 2017.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Memorandum from Manuel Rey, International Trade Compliance Analyst, Office II, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/ CVD Operations, entitled, ``Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished or Unfinished, From the People's Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative, Changed Circumstances, and New Shipper Reviews,'' dated November 1, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751 of the Act. Scope of the Order \3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order; Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished or Unfinished, From the People's Republic of China, 52 FR 22667 (June 15, 1987) (Order). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The merchandise covered by the order includes tapered roller bearings and parts thereof. The subject merchandise is currently classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 8482.20.00, 8482.91.00.50, 8482.99.15, 8482.99.45, 8483.20.40, 8483.20.80, 8483.30.80, 8483.90.20, 8483.90.30, 8483.90.80, 8708.70.6060, 8708.99.2300, 8708.99.4850, 8708.99.6890, 8708.99.8115, and 8708.99.8180. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes [[Page 4845]] only; the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see the ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review (2014-2015): Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, from the People's Republic of China,'' from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervialing Duty Operations, dated concurrently with, and adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memo). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Separate Rates In the Preliminary Results, we found that evidence provided by CPZ/ SKF, Nice Flourish, and Roci supported finding an absence of both de jure and de facto government control, and, therefore, we preliminarily granted a separate rate to each of these companies.\5\ We received no information since the issuance of the Preliminary Results that provides a basis for reconsidering these determinations. Therefore, for the final results, we continue to find that CPZ/SKF, Nice Flourish, and Roci are eligible for separate rates. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ Id., at 2-5. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- With respect to Yantai CMC, however, we determined in the Preliminary Results that this company failed to demonstrate an absence of de facto government control, and, thus, the Department did not grant Yantai CMC a separate rate. For these final results, we continue to find, based on record evidence, that Yantai CMC failed to demonstrate an absence of de facto government control. Accordingly, we are not granting Yantai CMC a separate rate. For further discussion of this issue, see Comments 2 through 5 of the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. Weighted-Average Dumping Margin for the Non-Examined, Separate-Rate Companies In accordance with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision in Albemarle Corp. v. United States, we are applying to the exporters subject to this review that are determined to be eligible for a separate rate, but are not selected as individually examined respondents, the rate calculated for the mandatory respondent, CPZ/SKF, which is de minimis.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See, Albemarle Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United States, 821 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review and new shipper review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues which parties raised and to which we respond in the Issues and Decision Memo is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://trade.gov/enforcement. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made no changes in the margin calculation for CPZ/SKF. Rescission of New Shipper Review For the reasons explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, the Department continues to find that Bolong's sale is non-bona fide. Because the non-bona fide sale was the only reported sale of subject merchandise during the POR, and thus there are no reviewable transactions, the Department is rescinding the NSR. Period of Review The POR is June 1, 2014, through May 31, 2015. Final Results of the Administrative Review Because Yantai CMC did not demonstrate that it is entitled to a separate rate, the Department finds Yantai CMC to be part of the PRC- wide entity. No party requested a review of the PRC-wide entity. Therefore, we did not conduct a review of the PRC-wide entity and the entity's rate is not subject to change.\7\ The rate previously established for the PRC-wide entity is 92.84 percent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity (NME) in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65970 (November 4, 2013). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Additionally, we are assigning the following weighted-average dumping margins to the firms listed below for the period June 1, 2014, through May 31, 2015: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporters dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Changshan Peer Bearing Co., Ltd............................. 0.00 Haining Nice Flourish Auto Parts Co., Ltd *................. 0.00 Roci International (HK) Limited *........................... 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * This company demonstrated eligibility for a separate rate in this administrative review. Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations performed within five days of the date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the Department has determined, and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise, where applicable, in accordance with the final results of this review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review. Pursuant to the Final Modification for Reviews,\8\ because the above-listed respondents' weighted-average dumping margins are zero, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted- Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). \9\ Id., 77 FR at 8102. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Yantai CMC, because the Department determined that this company did not qualify for a separate rate, we will instruct CBP to assess dumping duties on the company's entries of subject merchandise at the rate of 92.84 percent. For Bolong, because the Department rescinded the NSR, the Department will instruct CBP to discontinue the option of posting a bond or security in lieu of a cash deposit for entries of subject merchandise from Bolong. Bolong continues to be part of the PRC-wide entity and, therefore, we also will instruct CBP to assess dumping duties on the company's entries of subject merchandise at the rate of 92.84 percent. For entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales database submitted by an exporter individually examined during this review, the Department will [[Page 4846]] instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters listed above, the cash deposit rate will be equal to the weighted- average dumping margin established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is de minimis, then a cash deposit rate of zero will be established for that company); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that currently have separate a rate, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding where the exporter received that separate rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-wide entity, 92.84 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notifications to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notifications to Interested Parties This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing these results of review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: January 10, 2017. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Scope of the Order 4. Discussion of the Issues a. Surrogate Value for Truck Freight b. The Department Should Grant Yantai CMC a Separate Rate c. The Denial of Separate Rate Status for Yantai CMC Is Not Supported by Record Evidence d. The Rate Assigned to Yantai CMC e. The Department's Separate Rates Test and the Rate Assigned to Yantai CMC Are Inconsistent With the WTO Agreements f. The Department Should Continue the NSR and Calculate a Margin for the Final 5. Conclusion [FR Doc. 2017-00827 Filed 1-13-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![4844 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 17, 2017 / Notices
that is subject to the Regulations, or in Fifth, the Proposed Charging Letter, Flourish), Roci International (HK)
any other activity subject to the the Settlement Agreement, and this Limited (Roci), and Yantai CMC Bearing
Regulations. Order shall be made available to the Co., Ltd. (Yantai CMC). The Department
Second, no person may, directly or public. selected CPZ/SKF and Yantai CMC as
indirectly, do any of the following: Sixth, this Order shall be served on mandatory respondents for individual
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf Tyloo, and shall be published in the examination; however, we subsequently
of the Denied Person any item subject to Federal Register. found that Yantai CMC does not qualify
the Regulations; This Order, which constitutes the for a separate rate. The NSR covers
B. Take any action that facilitates the final agency action in this matter, is Shandong Bolong Bearing Co., Ltd.
acquisition or attempted acquisition by effective immediately. (Bolong).
the Denied Person of the ownership, Issued this 10th day of January, 2017. On July 14, 2016, the Department
possession, or control of any item Richard R. Majauskas, published the Preliminary Results.1 In
subject to the Regulations that has been Acting Assistant Secretary for Export the Preliminary Results, we found that
or will be exported from the United Enforcement. Bolong’s sale to the United States is not
States, including financing or other [FR Doc. 2017–00893 Filed 1–13–17; 8:45 am] bona fide, as required by section
support activities related to a BILLING CODE P
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
transaction whereby the Denied Person as amended (the Act), and, therefore, we
acquires or attempts to acquire such indicated that we intended to rescind
ownership, possession or control; DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE the NSR.
C. Take any action to acquire from or In August 2016, we received case
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted International Trade Administration briefs from the Timken Company (the
acquisition from the Denied Person of petitioner), Bolong and Yantai CMC. In
[A–570–601]
any item subject to the Regulations that September 2016, we received rebuttal
has been exported from the United Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts briefs from the petitioner and CPZ/SKF.
States; Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, In October 2016, the Department held a
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in From the People’s Republic of China: public hearing in the administrative
the United States any item subject to the Final Results of Antidumping Duty review at the request of the petitioner.
Regulations with knowledge or reason Administrative Review, and Rescission In November 2016, the Department
to know that the item will be, or is of New Shipper Review; 2014–2015 extended the deadline for the final
intended to be, exported from the results by 60 days to January 10, 2017.2
United States; or AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, The Department conducted this
E. Engage in any transaction to service International Trade Administration, review in accordance with section 751
any item subject to the Regulations that Department of Commerce. of the Act.
has been or will be exported from the SUMMARY: On July 14, 2016, the
Department of Commerce (Department) Scope of the Order 3
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied published the preliminary results of the The merchandise covered by the order
Person, or service any item, of whatever 28th administrative and new shipper includes tapered roller bearings and
origin, that is owned, possessed or reviews of the antidumping duty order parts thereof. The subject merchandise
controlled by the Denied Person if such on tapered roller bearings and parts is currently classifiable under
service involves the use of any item thereof, finished and unfinished (TRBs), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
subject to the Regulations that has been from the People’s Republic of China United States (HTSUS) subheadings:
or will be exported from the United (PRC). The period of review (POR) is 8482.20.00, 8482.91.00.50, 8482.99.15,
States. For purposes of this paragraph, June 1, 2014, through May 31, 2015. 8482.99.45, 8483.20.40, 8483.20.80,
servicing means installation, After analyzing the comments received, 8483.30.80, 8483.90.20, 8483.90.30,
maintenance, repair, modification or we made no changes to the margin 8483.90.80, 8708.70.6060, 8708.99.2300,
testing. calculations in the administrative 8708.99.4850, 8708.99.6890,
Third, after notice and opportunity for review and we are rescinding the new 8708.99.8115, and 8708.99.8180. The
comment as provided in Section 766.23 shipper review (NSR). The final HTSUS subheadings are provided for
of the Regulations, any person, firm, weighted-average dumping margins for convenience and customs purposes
corporation, or business organization the reviewed firms are listed below in
related to the Denied Person by the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of the 1 See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof,
affiliation, ownership, control, or Review.’’ Finished and Unfinished, From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results, Partial
position of responsibility in the conduct DATES: Effective January 17, 2017.
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative
of trade or related services may also be FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Review, and Preliminary Rescission of New Shipper
made subject to the provisions of this Blaine Wiltse or Manuel Rey, Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR 45455 (July 14, 2016)
Order. (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Enforcement and Compliance, Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Fourth, Tyloo shall not take any International Trade Administration, 2 See Memorandum from Manuel Rey,
action or make or permit to be made any U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 International Trade Compliance Analyst, Office II,
public statement, directly or indirectly, Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
denying the allegations in the Proposed DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6345 or to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Charging Letter or this Order. The AD/CVD Operations, entitled, ‘‘Tapered Roller
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
(202) 482–5518, respectively. Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished or Unfinished,
foregoing does not affect Tyloo’s From the People’s Republic of China: Extension of
testimonial obligations in any Background Deadline for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty
proceeding; nor does it affect his right These final results of administrative Administrative, Changed Circumstances, and New
to take legal or factual positions in civil review cover four exporters of the Shipper Reviews,’’ dated November 1, 2016.
3 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order; Tapered
litigation or other civil proceedings in subject merchandise, Changshan Peer Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished or
which the U.S. Department of Bearing Co. Ltd. (CPZ/SKF), Haining Unfinished, From the People’s Republic of China,
Commerce is not a party. Nice Flourish Auto Parts Co., Ltd. (Nice 52 FR 22667 (June 15, 1987) (Order).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:21 Jan 13, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM 17JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_4854/page/1.svg)
![4846 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 17, 2017 / Notices
instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at with the regulations and the terms of an DATES: Effective December 27, 2016.
the PRC-wide rate. APO is a sanctionable violation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
We are issuing and publishing these Stephanie Moore, AD/CVD Operations,
Cash Deposit Requirements
results of review in accordance with Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,
The following cash deposit sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the International Trade Administration,
requirements will be effective upon Act. U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
publication of the final results of this Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
Dated: January 10, 2017.
administrative review for all shipments DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3692.
of the subject merchandise entered, or Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication Compliance. Background
date, as provided for by section Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in On March 15, 2010, the Department of
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the the Issues and Decision Memorandum Commerce (the Department) issued the
exporters listed above, the cash deposit Final Results.1 Four parties contested
1. Summary
rate will be equal to the weighted- the Department’s findings in the Final
2. Background
average dumping margin established in 3. Scope of the Order Results. Three of the four plaintiffs,
the final results of this review (except, 4. Discussion of the Issues Union, HYSCO, and Dongbu, are Korean
if the rate is de minimis, then a cash a. Surrogate Value for Truck Freight producers/exporters of certain
deposit rate of zero will be established b. The Department Should Grant Yantai corrosion-resistant steel flat products
for that company); (2) for previously CMC a Separate Rate
(CORE). Union and HYSCO were
investigated or reviewed PRC and non- c. The Denial of Separate Rate Status for
Yantai CMC Is Not Supported by Record mandatory respondents in the fifteenth
PRC exporters not listed above that administrative review; Dongbu was an
currently have separate a rate, the cash Evidence
d. The Rate Assigned to Yantai CMC unexamined respondent subject to the
deposit rate will continue to be the non-selected rate. The remaining
e. The Department’s Separate Rates Test
exporter-specific rate published for the and the Rate Assigned to Yantai CMC plaintiff, United States Steel
most recently completed segment of this Are Inconsistent With the WTO Corporation (U.S. Steel), was a
proceeding where the exporter received Agreements petitioner in the fifteenth administrative
that separate rate; (3) for all PRC f. The Department Should Continue the review.
exporters of subject merchandise that NSR and Calculate a Margin for the Final In the Final Results, the Department
have not been found to be entitled to a 5. Conclusion
assigned weighted-average dumping
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will [FR Doc. 2017–00827 Filed 1–13–17; 8:45 am]
margins of 14.01 percent to Union and
be the rate for the PRC-wide entity, BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
3.29 percent to HYSCO.2 As an
92.84 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC unexamined respondent, Dongbu
exporters of subject merchandise which received the margin of 8.65 percent that
have not received their own separate DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
the Department assigned to all
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the unexamined respondents, which the
International Trade Administration
rate applicable to the PRC exporter that Department calculated as a simple
supplied that non-PRC exporter. [A–580–816] average of the non-de-minimis margins
These deposit requirements, when of the examined respondents.3
imposed, shall remain in effect until Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Flat
On May 25, 2012, the CIT issued its
further notice. Products From the Republic of Korea:
opinion in Union Steel I, which
Notice of Court Decision Not in
Notifications to Importers remanded various aspects of the Final
Harmony With Final Results and Notice
This notice also serves as a final Results to the Department.4 In
of Amended Final Results
reminder to importers of their particular, the Court made the following
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, holdings:
to file a certificate regarding the International Trade Administration, (1) the Department’s decision to use financial
reimbursement of antidumping duties Department of Commerce. data pertaining only to the 2008 fiscal year
prior to liquidation of the relevant SUMMARY: The Court of International of Union’s parent company in determining
Trade (CIT or Court) sustained in full Union’s interest expense ratio cannot be
entries during this review period.
the Department of Commerce’s (the upheld on judicial review; (2) in response to
Failure to comply with this requirement defendant’s request for a voluntary remand,
could result in the Secretary’s Department) second remand results
the court will order the Department to
presumption that reimbursement of pertaining to the fifteenth reconsider the ‘‘quarterly cost methodology
antidumping duties occurred and the administrative review of the to apply the ‘‘recovery-of-costs’’ test to home-
subsequent assessment of double antidumping duty order on certain market sales of Union and HYSCO and the
antidumping duties. corrosion-resistant steel flat products ‘‘indexing’’ methodology wherever used in
from the Republic of Korea covering the the Final Results; (3) on remand, the
Notifications to Interested Parties period of August 1, 2007, through July Department must reconsider the use in the
This notice serves as the only 31, 2008. The Department is notifying Final Results of the quarterly-cost and
reminder to parties subject to the public that the final judgment in this
1 See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel
administrative protective order (APO) of case is not in harmony with the final
Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Notice of
their responsibility concerning the results of the administrative review, and
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Final Results of the Fifteenth Administrative
disposition of proprietary information that the Department is amending the Review, 75 FR 13490 (March 22, 2010) (Final
disclosed under APO in accordance final results with respect to the Results) and accompanying Decision Memorandum
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely weighted-average dumping margins (Final Decision Memorandum).
2 See Final Results, 75 FR at 13491.
written notification of return or assigned to Union Steel Manufacturing 3 Id.
destruction of APO materials, or Co., Ltd. (Union), Hyundai HYSCO 4 See Union Steel Mfg. Co. v. United States, 837
conversion to judicial protective order, (HYSCO), and Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. F. Supp. 2d 1307 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2012) (Union Steel
is hereby requested. Failure to comply (Dongbu). I).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:21 Jan 13, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM 17JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_4854/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-01-14 01:44:42
Document Modified: 2017-01-14 01:44:42
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective January 17, 2017. | |
| Contact | Blaine Wiltse or Manuel Rey, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6345 or (202) 482-5518, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 4844 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR