82 FR 49155 - Student Assistance General Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan Program, Federal Family Education Loan Program, William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program, and Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grant Program
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 204 (October 24, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 204 (October 24, 2017)
| Page Range | 49155-49160 | |
| FR Document | 2017-22850 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 24, 2017)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 49155-49160] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-22850] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 34 CFR Parts 668, 674, 682, and 685 [Docket ID ED-2017-OPE-0112] RIN 1840-AD28 Student Assistance General Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan Program, Federal Family Education Loan Program, William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program, and Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grant Program AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Secretary proposes to further delay, until July 1, 2019, the effective date of selected provisions of the final regulations entitled Student Assistance General Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan Program, Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program, William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program, and Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grant Program (the final regulations), published in the Federal Register on November 1, 2016. The Secretary proposes this further delay to ensure that there is adequate time to conduct negotiated rulemaking and, as necessary, develop revised regulations. The provisions for which we propose to further delay the effective date are listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. The current effective date of selected provisions of the final regulations is July 1, 2018, in accordance with the interim final rule (IFR) published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. DATES: We must receive your comments on or before November 24, 2017. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal or via postal mail, commercial delivery, or hand delivery. We will not accept comments submitted by fax or by email or those submitted after the comment period. To ensure that we do not receive duplicate copies, please submit your comments only once. In addition, please include the Docket ID at the top of your comments. If you are submitting comments electronically, we strongly encourage you to submit any comments or attachments in Microsoft Word format. If you must submit a comment in Portable Document Format (PDF), we strongly encourage you to convert the PDF to print-to-PDF format or to use some other commonly used searchable text format. Please do not submit the PDF in a scanned format. Using a print-to-PDF format allows the Department to electronically search and copy certain portions of your submissions.Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov to submit your comments electronically. Information on using Regulations.gov, including instructions for accessing agency documents, submitting comments, and viewing the docket, is available on the site under ``Help.'' Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery, or Hand Delivery: The Department strongly encourages commenters to submit their comments electronically. However, if you mail or deliver your comments about the notice of proposed rulemaking, address them to Jean-Didier Gaina, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave. SW., Mail Stop 6W248, Washington, DC 20202. Privacy Note: The Department's policy is to make all comments received from members of the public available for public viewing on the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. Therefore, commenters should be careful to include in their comments only information that they wish to make publicly available. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Hoblitzell, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave. SW., Mail Stop 6W248, Washington, DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 453-7583 or by email at: [email protected]. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1- 800-877-8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Invitation To Comment: We invite you to submit comments regarding this notice of proposed rulemaking. We will consider comments on the further delayed effective date only and will not consider comments on the wording or substance of the final regulations. See [[Page 49156]] ADDRESSES for instructions on how to submit comments. During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public comments about this notice of proposed rulemaking by accessing Regulations.gov. You may also inspect the comments in person in room 6W245, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Washington, DC time, Monday through Friday of each week, except Federal holidays. If you want to schedule time to inspect comments, please contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Assistance to Individuals With Disabilities in Reviewing the Rulemaking Record: On request, we will provide an appropriate accommodation or auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability who needs assistance to review the comments or other documents in the public-rulemaking record for this notice of proposed rulemaking. If you want to schedule an appointment for this type of accommodation or auxiliary aid, please contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, the Department is publishing an IFR delaying until July 1, 2018, the effective date of selected provisions of the final regulations. The original effective date of the final regulations published November 1, 2016 (81 FR 75926) was July 1, 2017. On June 16, 2017, the Department published in the Federal Register a notification of the partial delay of effective dates under section 705 of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 705) (82 FR 27621) (705 Notice), to delay the effectiveness of certain provisions of the final regulations until a legal challenge by the California Association of Private Postsecondary Schools is resolved. See Complaint and Prayer for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, California Association of Private Postsecondary Schools v. DeVos, Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00999 (D.D.C. May 24, 2017). As explained in the IFR, because the final regulations have been postponed by the 705 Notice beyond July 1, 2017, they must become effective no earlier than July 1, 2018, to comply with section 482 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA) (20 U.S.C. 1089), also known as the ``master calendar requirement.'' Also on June 16, 2017, the Department announced its intent to convene a committee to develop proposed regulations to revise the regulations on borrower defense to repayment of Federal student loans and other matters. Given that the first negotiated rulemaking session is scheduled for November 13-15, 2017, we cannot complete the negotiated rulemaking process and the development of revised regulations by November 1, 2018. Under the master calendar, a regulatory change that has been published in final form on or before November 1 prior to the start of an award year--which begins on July 1 of any given year--may take effect only at the beginning of the next award year, or in other words, on July 1 of the next year. In light of this requirement, the regulations resulting from negotiated rulemaking could not be effective before July 1, 2019. As noted previously, elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, the Department is publishing an IFR delaying the effective date of the final regulations until July 1, 2018. The Department could implement the final regulations on July 1, 2018, pursuant to the IFR, or, through notice and comment rulemaking, we could delay the effective date until July 1, 2019, or a future July 1. We propose to further delay the effective date of the final regulations, to continue to preserve the regulatory status quo, until July 1, 2019. The Department would continue to process borrower defense claims under the existing regulations that will remain in effect during the delay so that borrowers may continue to apply for the discharge of all or a part of their loans. Based on the above considerations, the Department is proposing to delay until July 1, 2019, the effective date of the following provisions of the final regulations in title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR): Sec. 668.14(b)(30), (31), and (32) Program participation agreement. Sec. 668.41(h) and (i) Reporting and disclosure of information. Sec. 668.71(c) Scope and special definitions. Sec. 668.90(a)(3) Initial and final decisions. Sec. 668.93(h), (i), and (j) Limitation. Sec. 668.171 General. Sec. 668.175(c), (d), (f), and (h) Alternative standards and requirements. Part 668 subpart L, Appendix C. Sec. 674.33(g)(3) and (g)(8) Repayment. Sec. 682.202(b)(1) Permissible charges by lenders to borrowers. Sec. 682.211(i)(7) Forbearance. Sec. 682.402(d)(3), (d)(6)(ii)(B)(1) and (2), (d)(6)(ii)(F) introductory text, (d)(6)(ii)(F)(5), (d)(6)(ii)(G), (d)(6)(ii)(H) through (K), (d)(7)(ii) and (iii), (d)(8), and (e)(6)(iii) Death, disability, closed school, false certification, unpaid refunds, and bankruptcy payments. Sec. 682.405(b)(4)(ii) Loan rehabilitation agreement. Sec. 682.410(b)(4) and (b)(6)(viii) Fiscal, administrative, and enforcement requirements. Sec. 685.200(f)(3)(v) and (f)(4)(iii) Borrower eligibility. Sec. 685.205(b)(6) Forbearance. Sec. 685.206(c) Borrower responsibilities and defenses. Sec. 685.212(k) Discharge of a loan obligation. Sec. 685.214(c)(2) and (f)(4) through (7) Closed school discharge. Sec. 685.215(a)(1), (c)(1) through (c)(8), and (d) Discharge for false certification of student eligibility or unauthorized payment. Sec. 685.222 Borrower defenses. Part 685 subpart B, Appendix A Examples of borrower relief. Sec. 685.300(b)(11), (b)(12), and (d) through (i) Agreements between an eligible school and the Secretary for participation in the Direct Loan Program. Sec. 685.308(a) Remedial actions. As noted in the IFR, the Department interprets all references to ``July 1, 2017'' in the text of the above-referenced regulations to mean the effective date of those regulations. The regulatory text included references to the specific July 1, 2017, date in part to provide clarity to readers in the future as to when the regulations had taken effect. Because the regulations did not take effect on July 1, 2017, we would, in connection with this proposed additional delay of effective date, read those regulations as referring to the new effective date established by this further delay, i.e., July 1, 2019. This proposed delay of the final regulations will not delay the effective dates of the following regulatory provisions published in 81 FR 75926 which: (1) Expand the types of documentation that may be used for the granting of a discharge based on the death of the borrower; (2) amend the regulations governing the consolidation of Nursing Student Loans and Nurse Faculty Loans so that they align with the statutory requirements of section 428C(a)(4)(E) of the HEA; (3) amend the regulations governing Direct Consolidation Loans to allow a borrower to obtain a Direct Consolidation Loan regardless of whether the borrower is also seeking to consolidate a Direct Loan Program or FFEL Program loan, if the borrower has a loan type identified in 34 CFR 685.220(b); (4) address severability; and (5) make technical corrections. As established in 81 FR 75926, 34 CFR 682.211(i)(7) and 682.410(b)(6)(viii) would remain designated for early implementation, at the discretion of each lender or guaranty agency. [[Page 49157]] Waiver of Negotiated Rulemaking: Under section 492 of the HEA (20 U.S.C. 1098a), all regulations proposed by the Department for programs authorized under title IV of the HEA are subject to negotiated rulemaking requirements. However, section 492(b)(2) of the HEA provides that negotiated rulemaking may be waived for good cause when doing so would be ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Section 492(b)(2) of the HEA also requires the Secretary to publish the basis for waiving negotiations in the Federal Register at the same time as the proposed regulations in question are first published. For the reasons stated above, it would not be practicable, before the July 1, 2018 effective date specified in the IFR, to engage in negotiated rulemaking and publish final regulations. There is, therefore, good cause to waive negotiated rulemaking pertaining to this delay. Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13771 Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order 12866, it must be determined whether this regulatory action is ``significant'' and, therefore, subject to the requirements of the Executive Order and subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 defines a ``significant regulatory action'' as an action likely to result in a rule that may-- (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely affect a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or Tribal governments or communities in a material way (also referred to as an ``economically significant'' rule); (2) Create serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impacts of entitlement grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles stated in the Executive order. The Department estimates the quantified annualized economic and net budget impacts of the delay of the effective date to be -$26.9 million in reduced costs to institutions and the Federal government. These reduced costs result from the delay of the borrower defense provisions of the final regulations as they would apply to the 2017 to 2019 loan cohorts, as well as from the delayed paperwork burden on institutions, and the delayed execution of the closed school automatic discharge. This proposed regulatory action is a significant regulatory action subject to review by OMB under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. We have also reviewed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13563, which supplements and explicitly reaffirms the principles, structures, and definitions governing regulatory review established in Executive Order 12866. To the extent permitted by law, Executive Order 13563 requires that an agency-- (1) Propose or adopt regulations only on a reasoned determination that their benefits justify their costs (recognizing that some benefits and costs are difficult to quantify); (2) Tailor its regulations to impose the least burden on society, consistent with obtaining regulatory objectives and taking into account--among other things and to the extent practicable--the costs of cumulative regulations; (3) In choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, select those approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity); (4) To the extent feasible, specify performance objectives, rather than the behavior or manner of compliance a regulated entity must adopt; and (5) Identify and assess available alternatives to direct regulation, including economic incentives--such as user fees or marketable permits--to encourage the desired behavior, or provide information that enables the public to make choices. Executive Order 13563 also requires an agency ``to use the best available techniques to quantify anticipated present and future benefits and costs as accurately as possible.'' The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB has emphasized that these techniques may include ``identifying changing future compliance costs that might result from technological innovation or anticipated behavioral changes.'' We are issuing this proposed rule only on a reasoned determination that its benefits justify its costs. Based on the analysis that follows, the Department believes that this proposed rule is consistent with the principles in Executive Order 13563. We also have determined that this regulatory action does not unduly interfere with State, local, or Tribal governments in the exercise of their governmental functions. In accordance with both Executive orders, the Department has assessed the potential costs and benefits, both quantitative and qualitative, of this regulatory action. The quantified economic effects and net budget impact associated with the delayed effective date are not expected to be economically significant. Effects of One-Year Delay As indicated in the Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) published with the final regulations on November 1, 2016, the final regulations were economically significant with a total estimated net budget impact of $16.6 billion over the 2017-2026 loan cohorts in the primary estimate scenario, including a cost of $381 million for cohorts 2014-2016 attributable to the provisions for a three-year automatic closed school discharge. As the net budget impact is based on the net present value of the cash flows of the relevant cohorts over 40 years, delaying the final regulations for an additional year will have limited effect, as discussed below. This analysis is limited to the effect of delaying the effective date of the final regulations an additional year from July 1, 2018 to July 1, 2019, and does not account for any potential changes in the final regulations. Even with the further delayed effective date, borrowers will still be able to submit claims. The provisions of the final regulations pertaining to the process for review and determination of claims were not limited to specific cohorts designated by the effective date so the delay will not result in specific cohorts of borrowers being excluded from the process reflected in the final regulations, when implemented. Once in effect, the protection generated by the financial protection provisions will be available to be applied to claims from loans originated earlier, including the period from July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019. Loans made before July 1, 2017, were always subject to the State- based standard and borrowers' ability to bring claims under that standard is unchanged by the delay. For claims filed after the effective date of the regulations, for loans made on or after July 1, 2019, the Federal standard established in the final regulations would apply. As discussed previously, the Department interprets all references to ``July 1, 2017'' in the text of the final regulations to mean the effective date of the final regulations. As a result, the further delay in the effective date means that loans made between July 1, 2018 and June 30, 2019, will be subject to the [[Page 49158]] current State-based standard. As we noted in the final regulations, the Federal standard was designed to address much of the conduct already covered by the State-based standard, so the vast majority of claims associated with loans made between July 1, 2017, and the delayed effective date could be made under the current, State-based standard as well. In addition to borrowers, institutions are also affected by the delayed effective date. As indicated in the RIA for the final regulations, institutions bear the major costs of compliance, paperwork burden, and providing financial protection. The financial protection provisions of the final regulations depend on the effective date, so institutions will not incur these costs until the final regulations are in effect. In terms of cost savings for institutions, the estimated annual paperwork burden was approximately $9.4 million in the initial year of the final regulations. In the revised scenario developed to estimate the effect of the additional one-year delay in the effective date, transfers from institutions to students, via the Federal government, would be reduced by approximately $9.3 million for the 2017 and 2018 loan cohorts. The costs of providing financial protection were not quantified in the RIA for the final regulations, and the Department has no additional data to estimate costs institutions may avoid from the delayed effective date of the financial protection provisions. Net Budget Impact In order to estimate the net budget impact of the additional one- year delay in the effective date to July 1, 2019, the Department developed a scenario that revised the primary estimate assumptions from the final regulations for the affected 2017 to 2019 loan cohorts, as was done for the one-year delay described in the IFR. As before, the Department applies an assumed level of school misconduct, borrower claims success, and recoveries from institutions (respectively labeled as Conduct Percent, Borrower Percent, and Recovery Percent in Table 1) to the President's Budget 2018 (PB2018) loan volume estimates to generate the estimated net borrower defense claims for each cohort, loan type, and sector. The assumptions for the primary scenario from the 2016 final regulation were the basis for the President's Budget 2018 (PB2018) baseline that assumed the final regulations would go into effect on July 1, 2017. The scenario developed for this NPRM is designed to capture the incremental change from the one-year delay in the IFR associated with the further one-year delay in the effective date to July 1, 2019. Compared to the scenario developed for the IFR, recoveries are reduced by an additional two percent for the 2017 and 2018 cohorts, all of the 2018 cohort is subject to the State-based standard, and the affected portion of the 2019 cohort is subject to the current, State-based standard and reduced recoveries at the five percent level used for the one-year delay in the IFR. Table 1 presents assumptions for the primary estimate from the final regulations and the revised estimate for the further one-year delay, from July 1, 2018 to July 1, 2019, in the effective date. In this scenario, the conduct percent is 90 percent of the primary scenario from the final regulations and the borrower percent is the same. The financial protection provided was always expected to increase over time, so the delayed effective date in the near term is not expected to significantly affect the amount of recoveries over the life of any particular loan cohort, limiting any net budget impact from the delay. To estimate the potential reduction in recoveries related to the proposed delayed effective date, we reduced recoveries for the affected portion of the 2017 and 2018 cohorts by seven percent for the private not-for-profit and proprietary sectors and by five percent for the 2019 cohort. As in the final regulations and the IFR, recoveries from public institutions were held constant at 75 percent across scenarios. Table 1--Revised Assumptions for One-Year Delay From July 1, 2018 to July 1, 2019 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2017 2018 2019 Cohort ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pub/Priv NFP Prop Pub/Priv NFP Prop Pub/Priv NFP Prop -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conduct Percent: Final Primary....................................... 3.0 20 2.4 16 2.0 13.6 Delay to 2019....................................... 2.7 18 2.16 14.4 1.8 12.24 Borrower Percent: Final Primary....................................... 35 45 36.8 47.3 36.8 47.3 Delay to 2019....................................... 35 45 36.8 47.3 36.8 47.3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0Public Priv/Prop Public Priv/Prop Public Priv/Prop ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Recovery Percent: Final Primary....................................... 75 23.8 75 23.8 75 23.8 Delay to 2019....................................... 75 22.134 75 22.134 75 24.871 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The net budget impact associated with these effects of the additional one-year delay in the effective date on the borrower defense provisions only is approximately -$46.1 million from the 2017 to 2019 loan cohorts. As the amount and composition of borrower defense claims and estimated recoveries over the lifetime of the relevant loan cohorts are not expected to change greatly due to the delayed effective date, the Department does not estimate an economically significant net budget impact from the delay itself, with a potential net budget impact related to borrower defense claims of -$46.1 million in reduced costs for the affected cohorts. This represents the incremental change associated with the additional one-year delay from July 1, 2018 to July 1, 2019. If compared to the PB2018 baseline, the savings would be approximately -$78.8 million. The closed school automatic discharge provisions were the other significant source of estimated net budget impact in the final regulations. Under credit reform scoring, the modification to older cohorts for the automatic discharge provision estimated to cost $364 million was expected to occur in fiscal year (FY) 2017 in the President's Budget for FY 2018 (PB2018). As a result of the delay in the effective date, the Department will not execute the modification in FY 2017. As indicated in the IFR, the Department does expect to incur the costs associated with the three-year [[Page 49159]] automatic discharge after the delayed effective date, but moving the execution of the modification beyond FY 2017 will require a new cost analysis with economic assumptions from the fiscal year of the execution. This will result in a change of cost, but at this point it is not possible to know the discount rates in future fiscal years, so the cost of the modification will be determined in the year that it is executed. While the actual cost of the future modification cannot be determined at this time, the Department did approximate the effect of the delay by shifting the timing of the relevant discharges back by a year and recalculating a modification using the discount rates and economic assumptions used for the calculation of the PB2018 modification. When calculated in this manner, the delay in the modification to July 2018 described in the IFR resulted in estimated savings of less than $10 million. Using the same approach, the further delay to July 2019 is expected to save approximately $15 million above the savings from the initial one-year delay. As the delay does not change the substance of the automatic discharge, we would expect the amount and composition of loans affected by the automatic discharge not to change significantly. The closed school three-year automatic discharge provisions were applicable to loans made on or after November 1, 2013, and were not linked to the effective date of the final regulations. Therefore, delaying the effective date of those provisions will not change the set of loans eligible for this automatic discharge. Additionally, borrowers would have the ability to apply for a closed school discharge before July 1, 2019, if they did not want to wait for the automatic discharge to be implemented. For future cohorts, the delay is not significant as the three-year period will fall beyond the delayed effective date. Any significant change to the estimated net budget impact associated with the closed school automatic discharge depends on any substantive changes made to the provisions as a result of the upcoming rulemaking and changes to economic assumptions when the modification is executed. Consistent with Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017), we have estimated that this proposed rule will result in cost savings. Therefore, this proposed rule would be considered an Executive Order 13771 deregulatory action. Accounting Statement In evaluating whether a regulation is economically significant, a key consideration is whether the annual effect in any given year is over $100 million. To evaluate this, the Department looked at the difference in the undiscounted cashflows related to the death, disability, and bankruptcy (DDB) claims in which borrower defense claims are included for the one-year delay established in the IFR and the further one-year delay scenario described under Net Budget Impacts. The difference from subtracting the further delay scenario from the IFR one-year delay scenario for the 2017 to 2019 cohorts is summarized in Table 2. Table 2--Difference in Undiscounted Net Cashflows for the 2017 to 2019 Loan Cohorts From the Further One-Year Delay in 2016 Borrower Defense Rule to July 1, 2019 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Change in DDB Cashflow.......... 159 7,489 496,637 637,361 538,468 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Change in DDB Cashflow.......... 6,004,802 9,525,520 4,668,143 2,156,009 3,003,657 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table 3 shows the effects when those differences in the DDB cashflows are discounted at 7 and 3 percent and annualized. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Category Benefits ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Institutions may not incur compliance costs or costs of obtaining financial protection until the rule is in effect. Not Quantified ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Category Costs ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7% 3% ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Continued use of State-law based standard Not Quantified Delay in providing consumer information about institution's performance and practices Potential decreased awareness and usage of closed school and false certification discharges ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Savings associated with delay in -9.5 -9.51 compliance with paperwork requirements. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Category Transfers ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7% 3% ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Reduction in transfers from the Federal -3.5 -3.8 Government to affected borrowers in the 2017 to 2019 cohorts that would have been partially borne by affected institutions via reimbursements........ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Reduced reimbursements from affected -1.2 -1.3 institutions to affected students, via the Federal government as loan cohorts 2017 to 2019 are subject to the existing borrower defense regulation... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Delay in closed school automatic -14.8 -14.8 discharge implementation from 2018 to 2019................................... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [[Page 49160]] Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 As indicated in the Paperwork Reduction Act section published in the final regulations, the assessed estimated burden was 253,136 hours, affecting both institutions and individuals, with an estimated annual cost of $9,458,484. The table below identifies the regulatory sections, OMB Control Numbers, estimated burden hours, and estimated costs of the final regulations. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Estimated cost $36.55/hour Regulatory section OMB Control No. Burden hours institution $16.30/hour individual ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 668.14............................. 1845-0022 1,953................................ 71,382 668.41............................. 1845-0004 5,346................................ 195,396 668.171............................ 1845-0022 3,028................................ 110,673 668.175............................ 1845-0022 60,560............................... 2,213,468 682.211............................ 1845-0020 5,784................................ 211,405 682.402............................ 1845-0020 1,838................................ 67,179 685.222............................ 1845-0142 249 (Individuals).................... 4,059 685.222............................ 1845-0142 800 (Institutions)................... 29,240 685.300............................ 1845-0143 179,362.............................. 6,555,681 rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Total.......................... ................. 258,920.............................. 9,458,484 Cost savings due to delayed ................. 253,136.............................. 9,247,079 effective date excluding 682.211 early implementation allowed. Burden remaining................... ................. 5,784................................ 211,405 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This notice of proposed rulemaking delays the effective date of the implementation of all of the cited regulations and would result in a cost savings of the total amount of $9,458,484. However, Sec. 682.211(i)(7) of the final regulations, regarding mandatory forbearance based on a borrower defense claim, with an estimated 5,784 hours and $211,405 cost, as would continue to be designated for early implementation. Lenders may have elected early implementation and, therefore, those specific costs and hours remain applicable and have been subtracted from the overall estimated cost saving. Based on the delayed effective date of July 1, 2019, the revised estimated annual cost savings to institutions and individuals is $9,247,079 ($9,458,484 - $211,405) with an estimated burden hours savings of 253,136 (258,920 - 5,784). Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to the contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Electronic Access to this Document: The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System at: www.thefederalregister.org/fdsys. At this site, you can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text or PDF. To use PDF, you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the site. You may also access documents of the Department published in the Federal Register by using the article search feature at: www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published by the Department. List of Subjects 34 CFR Part 668 Administrative practice and procedure, Colleges and universities, Consumer protection, Grant programs--education, Loan programs-- education, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Selective Service System, Student aid, Vocational education. 34 CFR Part 674 Loan programs--education, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Student aid. 34 CFR Parts 682 and 685 Administrative practice and procedure, Colleges and universities, Loan programs--education, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Student aid, Vocational education. Dated: October 16, 2017. Betsy DeVos, Secretary of Education. [FR Doc. 2017-22850 Filed 10-20-17; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 24, 2017 / Proposed Rules 49155
message can be received without § 117.T879 Isthmus Slough. or those submitted after the comment
jeopardizing the safety or security of The draw of the Oregon State period. To ensure that we do not receive
people, places or vessels. secondary highway bridge, mile 1.0, at duplicate copies, please submit your
Coos Bay, shall operate in single leaf, comments only once. In addition, please
V. Public Participation and Request for
and open half the draw on signal if at include the Docket ID at the top of your
Comments
least 24 hours notice is given. The comments.
We view public participation as vertical clearance of the non-functioning If you are submitting comments
essential to effective rulemaking, and leaf will be reduced up to ten feet. electronically, we strongly encourage
will consider all comments and material Dated: October 13, 2017. you to submit any comments or
received during the comment period. attachments in Microsoft Word format.
Brendan C. McPherson,
Your comment can help shape the If you must submit a comment in
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
outcome of this rulemaking. If you Portable Document Format (PDF), we
Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
submit a comment, please include the strongly encourage you to convert the
[FR Doc. 2017–23052 Filed 10–23–17; 8:45 am]
docket number for this rulemaking, PDF to print-to-PDF format or to use
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
indicate the specific section of this some other commonly used searchable
document to which each comment text format. Please do not submit the
applies, and provide a reason for each PDF in a scanned format. Using a print-
suggestion or recommendation. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION to-PDF format allows the Department to
We encourage you to submit electronically search and copy certain
34 CFR Parts 668, 674, 682, and 685
comments through the Federal portions of your submissions.
eRulemaking Portal at http:// [Docket ID ED–2017–OPE–0112] • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov. If your material RIN 1840–AD28 www.regulations.gov to submit your
cannot be submitted using http:// comments electronically. Information
www.regulations.gov, contact the person Student Assistance General on using Regulations.gov, including
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan instructions for accessing agency
CONTACT section of this document for Program, Federal Family Education documents, submitting comments, and
alternate instructions. Loan Program, William D. Ford Federal viewing the docket, is available on the
We accept anonymous comments. All Direct Loan Program, and Teacher site under ‘‘Help.’’
comments received will be posted Education Assistance for College and • Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery,
without change to http:// Higher Education Grant Program or Hand Delivery: The Department
www.regulations.gov and will include strongly encourages commenters to
any personal information you have AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary submit their comments electronically.
provided. For more about privacy and Education, Department of Education. However, if you mail or deliver your
the docket, visit http:// ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. comments about the notice of proposed
www.regulations.gov/privacynotice. rulemaking, address them to Jean-Didier
SUMMARY: The Secretary proposes to Gaina, U.S. Department of Education,
Documents mentioned in this NPRM further delay, until July 1, 2019, the
as being available in this docket and all 400 Maryland Ave. SW., Mail Stop
effective date of selected provisions of 6W248, Washington, DC 20202.
public comments, will be in our online the final regulations entitled Student
docket at http://www.regulations.gov Privacy Note: The Department’s
Assistance General Provisions, Federal
and can be viewed by following that policy is to make all comments received
Perkins Loan Program, Federal Family
Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if from members of the public available for
Education Loan (FFEL) Program,
you go to the online docket and sign up public viewing on the Federal
William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan
for email alerts, you will be notified eRulemaking Portal at
Program, and Teacher Education
when comments are posted or a final www.regulations.gov. Therefore,
Assistance for College and Higher
rule is published. commenters should be careful to
Education Grant Program (the final
include in their comments only
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 regulations), published in the Federal
information that they wish to make
Register on November 1, 2016. The
Bridges. publicly available.
Secretary proposes this further delay to
For the reasons discussed in the ensure that there is adequate time to FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to conduct negotiated rulemaking and, as Barbara Hoblitzell, U.S. Department of
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows: necessary, develop revised regulations. Education, 400 Maryland Ave. SW.,
The provisions for which we propose to Mail Stop 6W248, Washington, DC
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE further delay the effective date are listed 20202. Telephone: (202) 453–7583 or by
OPERATION REGULATIONS in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION email at: Barbara.Hoblitzell@ed.gov.
section of this document. The current If you use a telecommunications
■ 1. The authority citation for part 117 effective date of selected provisions of device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
continues to read as follows: the final regulations is July 1, 2018, in telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1; accordance with the interim final rule Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
Department of Homeland Security Delegation (IFR) published elsewhere in this issue 8339.
No. 0170.1.
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
of the Federal Register. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
■ 2. Suspend § 117.879 from 6 a.m. on DATES: We must receive your comments Invitation To Comment: We invite
February 26, 2018, through 6 p.m. on on or before November 24, 2017. you to submit comments regarding this
July 31, 2019. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments notice of proposed rulemaking. We will
■ 3. Add a new temporary § 117.T879, through the Federal eRulemaking Portal consider comments on the further
from 6 a.m. on February 26, 2018, or via postal mail, commercial delivery, delayed effective date only and will not
through 6 p.m. on July 31, 2019, to read or hand delivery. We will not accept consider comments on the wording or
as follows: comments submitted by fax or by email substance of the final regulations. See
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:07 Oct 23, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\24OCP1.SGM 24OCP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_49359/page/1.svg)
![49160 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 24, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 final regulations, the assessed estimated The table below identifies the regulatory
burden was 253,136 hours, affecting sections, OMB Control Numbers,
As indicated in the Paperwork both institutions and individuals, with estimated burden hours, and estimated
Reduction Act section published in the an estimated annual cost of $9,458,484. costs of the final regulations.
Estimated cost
$36.55/hour
Regulatory section OMB Control No. Burden hours institution
$16.30/hour
individual
668.14 .............................................................................................................. 1845–0022 1,953 .............................. 71,382
668.41 .............................................................................................................. 1845–0004 5,346 .............................. 195,396
668.171 ............................................................................................................ 1845–0022 3,028 .............................. 110,673
668.175 ............................................................................................................ 1845–0022 60,560 ............................ 2,213,468
682.211 ............................................................................................................ 1845–0020 5,784 .............................. 211,405
682.402 ............................................................................................................ 1845–0020 1,838 .............................. 67,179
685.222 ............................................................................................................ 1845–0142 249 (Individuals) ............ 4,059
685.222 ............................................................................................................ 1845–0142 800 (Institutions) ............ 29,240
685.300 ............................................................................................................ 1845–0143 179,362 .......................... 6,555,681
Total ......................................................................................................... .............................. 258,920 .......................... 9,458,484
Cost savings due to delayed effective date excluding 682.211 early imple- .............................. 253,136 .......................... 9,247,079
mentation allowed.
Burden remaining ............................................................................................ .............................. 5,784 .............................. 211,405
This notice of proposed rulemaking You may also access documents of the POSTAL SERVICE
delays the effective date of the Department published in the Federal
implementation of all of the cited Register by using the article search 39 CFR Part 20
regulations and would result in a cost feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
savings of the total amount of International Mailing Services:
Specifically, through the advanced
$9,458,484. However, § 682.211(i)(7) of Proposed Product and Price
search feature at this site, you can limit
the final regulations, regarding Changes—CPI
your search to documents published by
mandatory forbearance based on a the Department. AGENCY:Postal ServiceTM.
borrower defense claim, with an
List of Subjects Proposed rule with a request for
ACTION:
estimated 5,784 hours and $211,405
comments.
cost, as would continue to be designated
for early implementation. Lenders may 34 CFR Part 668
SUMMARY: The Postal Service proposes
have elected early implementation and, Administrative practice and to revise Mailing Standards of the
therefore, those specific costs and hours procedure, Colleges and universities, United States Postal Service,
remain applicable and have been Consumer protection, Grant programs— International Mail Manual (IMM®), to
subtracted from the overall estimated education, Loan programs—education, reflect changes in the prices, product
cost saving. Based on the delayed features, and classification changes to
Reporting and recordkeeping
effective date of July 1, 2019, the revised Mailing Services. These changes would
requirements, Selective Service System,
estimated annual cost savings to also implement a restriction on the
institutions and individuals is Student aid, Vocational education.
contents of First-Class Mail
$9,247,079 ($9,458,484 ¥ $211,405) 34 CFR Part 674 International® to documents only, to
with an estimated burden hours savings comply with standards established by
of 253,136 (258,920 ¥ 5,784). Loan programs—education, Reporting the Universal Postal Union (UPU).
Accessible Format: Individuals with and recordkeeping requirements,
DATES: We must receive your comments
disabilities may obtain this document in Student aid.
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large on or before November 24, 2017.
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on 34 CFR Parts 682 and 685 ADDRESSES: Mail or deliver comments to
request to the contact person listed the manager, Product Classification,
Administrative practice and U.S. Postal Service®, 475 L’Enfant Plaza
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
procedure, Colleges and universities, SW., RM 4446, Washington, DC 20260–
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to this Document: Loan programs—education, Reporting 5015. You may inspect and photocopy
The official version of this document is and recordkeeping requirements, all written comments at USPS®
the document published in the Federal Student aid, Vocational education. Headquarters Library, 475 L’Enfant
Register. Free internet access to the Dated: October 16, 2017. Plaza SW., 11th Floor N, Washington,
official edition of the Federal Register Betsy DeVos, DC by appointment only between the
and the Code of Federal Regulations is hours of 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Secretary of Education.
available via the Federal Digital System through Friday by calling 1–202–268–
[FR Doc. 2017–22850 Filed 10–20–17; 4:15 pm]
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site, you 2906 in advance. Email comments,
can view this document, as well as all BILLING CODE 4000–01–P containing the name and address of the
other documents of this Department commenter, to: ProductClassification@
published in the Federal Register, in usps.gov, with a subject line of ‘‘January
text or PDF. To use PDF, you must have 2018 International Mailing Services
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is Price Change—CPI.’’ Faxed comments
available free at the site. are not accepted.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:07 Oct 23, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\24OCP1.SGM 24OCP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_49359/page/6.svg)
Document Created: 2018-10-25 10:10:26
Document Modified: 2018-10-25 10:10:26
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Notice of proposed rulemaking. | |
| Dates | We must receive your comments on or before November 24, 2017. | |
| Contact | Barbara Hoblitzell, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave. SW., Mail Stop 6W248, Washington, DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 453-7583 or by email at: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 49155 | |
| RIN Number | 1840-AD28 | |
| CFR Citation | 34
CFR
668 34 CFR 674 34 CFR 682 34 CFR 685 | |
| CFR Associated | Administrative Practice and Procedure; Colleges and Universities; Consumer Protection; Grant Programs-Education; Loan Programs-Education; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Selective Service System; Student Aid and Vocational Education |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR