82 FR 49179 - Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 204 (October 24, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 204 (October 24, 2017)
| Page Range | 49179-49181 | |
| FR Document | 2017-23020 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 24, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 49179-49181] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-23020] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-489-501] Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On June 6, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on welded carbon steel standard pipe and tube products (welded pipe and tube) from Turkey. The period of review (POR) is May 1, 2015 through April 30, 2016. The review covers the following producers/exporters of the subject merchandise: Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. (Borusan Istikbal) and Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Borusan Mannesmann) (collectively, Borusan); Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S., Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S., and Toscelik Metal Ticaret A.S. (Toscelik Metal) (collectively, Toscelik); Borusan Birlesik Boru Fabrikalari San ve Tic (Borusan Birlesik); Borusan Gemlik Boru Tesisleri A.S. (Borusan Gemlik); Borusan Ihracat Ithalat ve Dagitim A.S. (Borusan Ihracat); Borusan Ithicat ve Dagitim A.S. (Borusan Ithicat); Tubeco Pipe and Steel Corporation (Tubeco); Erbosan Erciyas Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Erbosan); and Yucel Boru ve Profil Endustrisi A.S., Yucelboru Ihracat Ithalat ve Pazarlama A.S., and Cayirova Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (collectively, the Yucel Group). Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made certain changes in the margin calculations. The final weighted-average dumping margins for the reviewed firms are listed below in the section entitled, ``Final Results of the Review.'' Further, we continue to find that Erbosan, Borusan Birlesik, Borusan Gemlik, Borusan Ihracat, Borusan Ithicat, and Tubeco had no reviewable shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. DATES: Effective October 24, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Baker or Chelsey Simonovich, AD/ CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2924 or (202) 482-1979, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 6, 2017, the Department published the Preliminary Results of this review in the Federal Register.\1\ We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. On July 20, 2017, we received a case brief from petitioner Wheatland Tube Company (Wheatland Tube). On July 28, 2017, we received a rebuttal brief from Borusan.\2\ The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2015-2016, 82 FR 26053 (June 6, 2017) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. \2\ As explained in the Preliminary Results, the Department treated Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. as a single entity in this administrative review. See Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 1 n.1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is welded pipe and tube. The welded pipe and tube subject to the order is currently classifiable under subheading 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and 7306.30.5090 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes [[Page 49180]] only. The written description is dispositive.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ A full written description of the scope of the order is contained in the memorandum to Gary Taverman, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey; 2015-2016,'' (IDM), dated concurrently with this notice and incorporated herein by reference. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, the Department determined that Erbosan, Borusan Birlesik, Borusan Gemlik, Borusan Ihracat, Borusan Ithicat, and Tubeco had no shipments during the POR.\4\ Following publication of the Preliminary Results, we received no comments from interested parties regarding these companies. As a result, and because the record contains no evidence to the contrary, we continue to find that Erbosan, Borusan Birlesik, Borusan Gemlik, Borusan Ihracat, Borusan Ithicat, and Tubeco made no shipments during the POR. Accordingly, consistent with the Department's practice, we intend to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by Erbosan, Borusan Birlesik, Borusan Gemlik, Borusan Ihracat, Borusan Ithicat, and Tubeco, but exported by other parties without their own rate, at the all-others rate.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 26054, and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 3-4. \5\ See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Further, while Borusan Istikbal submitted a no-shipment certification, we continue to treat it as a single entity with Borusan Mannesmann, as there is no record evidence that warrants altering this treatment. Because we continue to find that Borusan had shipments during this POR, we do not make a final determination of no shipments with respect to Borusan Istikbal.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of the Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs submitted in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted with this notice. A list of the issues raised is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made certain changes to the Preliminary Results. For a full discussion of these changes, see Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Rates for Non-Examined Companies The statute and the Department's regulations do not address the establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for examination when the Department limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, the Department looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not selected for individual review in an administrative review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all- others rate is normally ``an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts available{time} .'' In this review, we have a calculated a weighted-average dumping margin for Borusan that is not zero, de minimis, or determined entirely on the basis of facts available. Accordingly, the Department assigns to the companies not individually examined the 1.55 percent weighted- average dumping margin calculated for Borusan. Final Results of the Review As a result of this review, we determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period May 1, 2015 through April 30, 2016: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted-average Producer or exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S./ 1.55 Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S..................... Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S./Tosyali Dis 0.00 Ticaret A.S./Toscelik Metal Ticaret A.S.\7\........ Yucel Boru ve Profil Endustrisi A.S................. 1.55 Yucelboru Ihracat Ithalat ve Pazarlama A.S.......... 1.55 Cayirova Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S................. 1.55 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these final results of review within five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ In prior segments of this proceeding, we treated Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S., Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S., and Toscelik Metal as a single entity. See, e.g., Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 71087, 71088 n.8 (December 1, 2014). However, in a prior review, we found that Toscelik Metal has ceased to exist. Id. There is no record evidence that warrants altering this treatment. Therefore, for these final results, we are treating Toscelik and Tosyali as a single entity, and continue to find that Toscelik Metal no longer exists. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment The Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). For Borusan, because its weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the Department has calculated importer-specific antidumping duty assessment [[Page 49181]] rates. We calculated importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales of each importer and dividing each of these amounts by the total entered value associated with those sales. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review where an importer-specific assessment rate is not zero or de minimis. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to antidumping duties any entries for which the importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis. For Toscelik, we will instruct CBP to liquidate its entries during the POR imported by the importers identified in its questionnaire responses without regard to antidumping duties because its weighted- average dumping margin in these final results is zero.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted- Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103, 8103 (February 14, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For companies that were not selected for individual examination, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries based on the methodology described in the ``Final Rates for Non-Examined Companies'' section, above. Consistent with the Department's assessment practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by any company upon which we initiated an administrative review, for which they did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rates will be equal to the weighted- average dumping margins established in the final results of this review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not participating in this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company was reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a previous review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 14.74 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.\10\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See Antidumping Duty Order; Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey, 51 FR 17784 (May 15, 1986). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See 19 CFR 351.402(f)(3). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5) of the Department's regulations. Dated: October 18, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order Discussion of the Issues Toscelik 1. Toscelik's U.S. Sale that is Outside the Period of Review Borusan 2. Reallocation of Zinc Costs 3. ``Match Production'' Language in the SAS Program 4. Home Market Sales Intended for Export 5. Sample Sales in the Home Market Database 6. Ministerial Error 7. Distortions Caused by Currency Issues Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-23020 Filed 10-23-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 24, 2017 / Notices 49179
and Taiwan.1 Currently, the preliminary For the reasons stated above and (Borusan Ithicat); Tubeco Pipe and Steel
determinations in these investigations because there is no compelling reason to Corporation (Tubeco); Erbosan Erciyas
are due no later than November 7, 2017. deny the request, the Department, Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Erbosan);
pursuant to section 733(c)(1)(A) of the and Yucel Boru ve Profil Endustrisi
Postponement of Preliminary
Act, is postponing the deadline for these A.S., Yucelboru Ihracat Ithalat ve
Determination
preliminary determinations to no later Pazarlama A.S., and Cayirova Boru
Section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act than 181 days after the date on which Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (collectively, the
of 1930, as amended (Act), requires the these investigations were initiated, i.e., Yucel Group). Based on our analysis of
Department to issue the preliminary to December 18, 2017. Pursuant to the comments received, we have made
determination in a less-than-fair-value section 735(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR certain changes in the margin
investigation within 140 days after the 351.210(b)(1), the deadline for the final calculations. The final weighted-average
date on which the Department initiated determinations will continue to be 75 dumping margins for the reviewed firms
the investigation. However, section days after the date of the preliminary are listed below in the section entitled,
733(c)(1) of the Act permits the determination, unless postponed at a ‘‘Final Results of the Review.’’ Further,
Department to postpone the preliminary later date. we continue to find that Erbosan,
determination until no later than 190 This notice is issued and published Borusan Birlesik, Borusan Gemlik,
days after the date on which the pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act Borusan Ihracat, Borusan Ithicat, and
Department initiated the investigation and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1). Tubeco had no reviewable shipments of
if: (A) The petitioner makes a timely Dated: October 18, 2017. subject merchandise during the POR.
request for a postponement; or (B) the
Gary Taverman, DATES: Effective October 24, 2017.
Department concludes that the parties
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred
concerned are cooperating, that the
and Countervailing Duty Operations, Baker or Chelsey Simonovich, AD/CVD
investigation is extraordinarily performing the non-exclusive functions and
complicated, and that additional time is Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
necessary to make a preliminary Compliance, International Trade
Enforcement and Compliance.
determination. Under 19 CFR Administration, U.S. Department of
[FR Doc. 2017–23021 Filed 10–23–17; 8:45 am]
351.205(e), the petitioner must submit a Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
request for postponement 25 days or NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
more before the scheduled date of the (202) 482–2924 or (202) 482–1979,
preliminary determination and must respectively.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
state the reasons for the request. The SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Department will grant the request unless International Trade Administration
it finds compelling reasons to deny the Background
[A–489–501]
request. See CFR 351.205(e). On June 6, 2017, the Department
On October 13, 2017, the petitioners 2 Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe published the Preliminary Results of
submitted a timely request, pursuant to and Tube Products From Turkey: Final this review in the Federal Register.1 We
section 733(c)(1)(A) of the Act, that the Results of Antidumping Duty invited parties to comment on the
Department postpone the preliminary Administrative Review and Final Preliminary Results. On July 20, 2017,
determinations in these less-than-fair- Determination of No Shipments; 2015– we received a case brief from petitioner
value investigations.3 In accordance 2016 Wheatland Tube Company (Wheatland
with 19 CFR 351.205(e), the petitioners Tube). On July 28, 2017, we received a
stated the reasons for their request. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, rebuttal brief from Borusan.2 The
Specifically, the petitioners state that International Trade Administration, Department conducted this review in
additional time is necessary for the Department of Commerce. accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the
Department to issue supplemental SUMMARY: On June 6, 2017, the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
questionnaires and clarfy the initial Department of Commerce (the
questionnaire responses to accurately Department) published the preliminary Scope of the Order
determine whether and what magnitude results of the administrative review of The merchandise subject to the order
of dumping occurred during the period the antidumping duty order on welded is welded pipe and tube. The welded
of investigation.4 carbon steel standard pipe and tube pipe and tube subject to the order is
products (welded pipe and tube) from currently classifiable under subheading
1 See Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the Turkey. The period of review (POR) is 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025,
People’s Republic of China, India, the Republic of May 1, 2015 through April 30, 2016. 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040,
Korea, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value
The review covers the following 7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and
Investigations, 82 FR 29023 (June 27, 2017). The producers/exporters of the subject 7306.30.5090 of the Harmonized Tariff
fine denier PSF from the Socialist Republic of merchandise: Borusan Istikbal Ticaret Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Vietnam investigation was terminated; see Fine T.A.S. (Borusan Istikbal) and Borusan
Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the Socialist
The HTSUS subheadings are provided
Republic of Vietnam: Termination of Less-Than- Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret for convenience and customs purposes
Fair-Value Investigation, 82 FR 33480 (July 20, A.S. (Borusan Mannesmann)
2017). (collectively, Borusan); Toscelik Profil 1 See Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and
2 In these investigations, the petitioners are DAK
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
ve Sac Endustrisi A.S., Tosyali Dis Tube Products from Turkey: Preliminary Results of
Americas LLC, Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and
America, and Auriga Polymers Inc.
Ticaret A.S., and Toscelik Metal Ticaret
Partial Rescission of Review; 2015–2016, 82 FR
3 See the petitioner’s letter, ‘‘Fine Denier A.S. (Toscelik Metal) (collectively, 26053 (June 6, 2017) (Preliminary Results), and
Polyester Staple Fiber from India, the People’s Toscelik); Borusan Birlesik Boru accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, and Fabrikalari San ve Tic (Borusan 2 As explained in the Preliminary Results, the
Taiwan—Petitioners’ Request to Postpone the Birlesik); Borusan Gemlik Boru Tesisleri Department treated Borusan Mannesmann Boru
Antidumping Duty Preliminary Determinations,’’ Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Borusan Istikbal Ticaret
dated October 13, 2017, requesting postponement of A.S. (Borusan Gemlik); Borusan Ihracat T.A.S. as a single entity in this administrative
the preliminary determination. Ithalat ve Dagitim A.S. (Borusan review. See Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at
4 Id. Ihracat); Borusan Ithicat ve Dagitim A.S. 1 n.1.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:47 Oct 23, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM 24OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_49383/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 24, 2017 / Notices 49181
rates. We calculated importer-specific participating in this review, the cash Dated: October 18, 2017.
ad valorem antidumping duty deposit rate will continue to be the Gary Taverman,
assessment rates by aggregating the total company-specific rate published for the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
amount of dumping calculated for the most recently completed segment of this and Countervailing Duty Operations,
examined sales of each importer and proceeding in which the company was performing the non-exclusive functions and
dividing each of these amounts by the duties of the Assistant Secretary for
reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
total entered value associated with those Enforcement and Compliance.
covered in this review, a previous
sales. We will instruct CBP to assess review, or the original less-than-fair- Appendix
antidumping duties on all appropriate value (LTFV) investigation, but the List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
entries covered by this review where an manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate Decision Memorandum
importer-specific assessment rate is not will be the rate established for the most
zero or de minimis. Pursuant to 19 CFR Summary
recently completed segment of this Background
351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to
proceeding for the manufacturer of Scope of the Order
liquidate without regard to antidumping Discussion of the Issues
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash
duties any entries for which the
importer-specific assessment rate is zero deposit rate for all other manufacturers Toscelik
or de minimis. or exporters will continue to be 14.74 1. Toscelik’s U.S. Sale that is Outside the
For Toscelik, we will instruct CBP to percent, the all-others rate established Period of Review
liquidate its entries during the POR in the LTFV investigation.10 These
Borusan
imported by the importers identified in deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further 2. Reallocation of Zinc Costs
its questionnaire responses without 3. ‘‘Match Production’’ Language in the SAS
regard to antidumping duties because its notice. Program
weighted-average dumping margin in Notification to Importers 4. Home Market Sales Intended for Export
these final results is zero.8 5. Sample Sales in the Home Market Database
For companies that were not selected This notice serves as a final reminder 6. Ministerial Error
for individual examination, we will to importers of their responsibility 7. Distortions Caused by Currency Issues
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed Recommendation
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
entries based on the methodology certificate regarding the reimbursement [FR Doc. 2017–23020 Filed 10–23–17; 8:45 am]
described in the ‘‘Final Rates for Non- of antidumping duties prior to BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Examined Companies’’ section, above. liquidation of the relevant entries
Consistent with the Department’s during this review period. Failure to
assessment practice, for entries of DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
comply with this requirement could
subject merchandise during the POR
result in the presumption that National Oceanic and Atmospheric
produced by any company upon which
we initiated an administrative review, reimbursement of antidumping duties Administration
for which they did not know that the occurred and the subsequent assessment
merchandise was destined for the of double antidumping duties.11 Submission for OMB Review;
United States, we will instruct CBP to Comment Request
Administrative Protective Orders
liquidate unreviewed entries at the all- The Department of Commerce will
others rate if there is no rate for the This notice also serves as a reminder submit to the Office of Management and
intermediate company(ies) involved in to parties subject to administrative Budget (OMB) for clearance the
the transaction.9 protective order (APO) of their following proposal for collection of
We intend to issue instructions to responsibility concerning the information under the provisions of the
CBP 15 days after publication of the destruction of proprietary information Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
final results of this review. disclosed under APO in accordance Chapter 35).
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely Agency: National Oceanic and
Cash Deposit Requirements
written notification of the return or Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
The following cash deposit destruction of APO materials or Title: Dr. Nancy Foster Scholarship
requirements will be effective for all Program.
conversion to judicial protective order is
shipments of subject merchandise OMB Control Number: 0648–0432.
hereby requested. Failure to comply Form Number(s): None.
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
with the regulations and terms of an Type of Request: Regular (revision
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of APO is a sanctionable violation. and extension of a currently approved
this administrative review, as provided We are issuing and publishing these information collection).
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) results in accordance with sections Number of Respondents: 600.
The cash deposit rates will be equal to 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 Average Hours per Response: Dr.
the weighted-average dumping margins CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5) of the Nancy Foster application form: 8 hours;
established in the final results of this Department’s regulations. Letter of Recommendation: 45 minutes;
review; (2) for previously reviewed or Bio/Photograph Submission: 1 hour;
investigated companies not Annual Report: 1 hour, 30 minutes; and
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Evaluation: 15 minutes.
8 See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Burden Hours: 1,917.
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Needs and Uses: This request is for a
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty revision and extension of a current
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103, 8103 information collection. The evaluation
(February 14, 2012).
9 For a full discussion of this practice, see
10 See Antidumping Duty Order; Welded Carbon form has been completely redesigned.
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from The National Oceanic and
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 Turkey, 51 FR 17784 (May 15, 1986). Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
(May 6, 2003). 11 See 19 CFR 351.402(f)(3). Office of National Marine Sanctuaries
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:47 Oct 23, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM 24OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_49383/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-10-25 10:07:37
Document Modified: 2018-10-25 10:07:37
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective October 24, 2017. | |
| Contact | Fred Baker or Chelsey Simonovich, AD/ CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2924 or (202) 482-1979, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 49179 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR