82 FR 51387 - Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber From India: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 213 (November 6, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 213 (November 6, 2017)
| Page Range | 51387-51389 | |
| FR Document | 2017-24078 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 213 (Monday, November 6, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 51387-51389] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-24078] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-533-876] Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber From India: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of fine denier polyester staple fiber (fine denier PSF) from India. The period of investigation is January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. DATES: Applicable November 6, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trisha Tran or Eli Lovely, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4852 or (202) 482-1593, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background This preliminary determination is made in accordance with section 703(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The Department published the notice of initiation of this investigation on June 27, 2017.\1\ On August 8, 2017, the Department postponed the preliminary determination of this investigation and the revised deadline is now October 30, 2017.\2\ For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this investigation, see the Preliminary Decision [[Page 51388]] Memorandum.\3\ A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix II to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from India and the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations, 82 FR 29028 (June 27,2017) (Initiation Notice). \2\ See Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the People's Republic of China and India: Postponement of Preliminary Determinations in the Countervailing Duty Investigations, 82 FR 37048 (August 8, 2017). \3\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Determination of the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from India,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Investigation The product covered by this investigation is fine denier PSF from India. For a complete description of the scope of this investigation, see Appendix I. Scope Comments In accordance with the preamble to the Department's regulations,\4\ the Initiation Notice set aside a period of time for parties to raise issues regarding product coverage, (i.e., scope).\5\ Certain interested parties commented on the scope of the investigation as it appeared in the Initiation Notice, as well as additional language proposed by the Department.\6\ The Department intends to issue its preliminary decision regarding comments concerning the scope of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) investigations in the preliminary determination of the companion AD investigation. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997). \5\ See Initiation Notice. \6\ Letter from from David C. Poole Company Inc., ``Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the People's Republic of China, India, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, and Vietnam; Scope Comments,'' dated July 10, 2017; Letter from Suominen Corporation, ``Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the People's Republic of China, India, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,'' dated July 10, 2017; Letter from Consolidated Fibers, Inc., ``Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the People's Republic of China, India, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam--Scope Comments,'' dated July 10, 2017; Letter from Reliance, ``Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the People's Republic of China, India, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Reliance Industries, Ltd.'s Comments Regarding the Scope of the Investigation,'' dated July 10, 2017; Letter from the petitioners, ``Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the People's Republic of China, India, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam-- Petitioners' Scope Comments,'' dated July 12, 2017; Letter from the petitioners, ``Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the People's Republic of China, India, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam--Petitioners' Rebuttal Scope Comments to the Importers' Scope Exclusion Requests,'' dated July 12, 2017. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department is conducting this investigation in accordance with section 701 of the Act. For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, the Department preliminarily determines that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by an ``authority'' that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department notes that, in making these findings, it relied, in part, on facts available and, because it finds that one or more respondents did not act to the best of their ability to respond to the Department's requests for information, it drew an adverse inference where appropriate in selecting from among the facts otherwise available.\8\ For further information, see ``Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences'' in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- All-Others Rate Sections 703(d) and 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act provide that in the preliminary determination, the Department shall determine an estimated all-others rate for companies not individually examined. This rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated subsidy rates established for those companies individually examined, excluding any zero and de minimis rates and any rates based entirely under section 776 of the Act. In this investigation, the Department calculated individual estimated countervailable subsidy rates for Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Company Limited (Bombay Dyeing) and Reliance Limited Industries (Reliance) that are not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts otherwise available. The Department calculated the all-others' rate using a weighted average of the individual estimated subsidy rates calculated for the examined respondents using each company's publicly- ranged values for the merchandise under consideration.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ With two respondents under examination, the Department normally calculates (A) a weighted-average of the estimated subsidy rates calculated for the examined respondents; (B) a simple average of the estimated subsidy rates calculated for the examined respondents; and (C) a weighted-average of the estimated subsidy rates calculated for the examined respondents using each company's publicly-ranged U.S. sale quantities for the merchandise under consideration. The Department then compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects the rate closest to (A) as the most appropriate rate for all other producers and exporters. See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 (September 1, 2010). As complete publicly ranged sales data was available, the Department based the all-others rate on the publicly ranged sales data of the mandatory respondents. For a complete analysis of the data, please see the All-Others' Rate Calculation Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Determination The Department preliminarily determines that the following estimated countervailable subsidy rates exist: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subsidy rate Company (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Company Limited........... 7.18 Reliance Industries Limited............................. 9.86 All-Others.............................................. 9.37 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Suspension of Liquidation In accordance with section 703(d)(1)(B) and (d)(2) of the Act, the Department will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of entries of subject merchandise as described in the scope of the investigation section entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Further, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.205(d), the Department will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit equal to the rates indicated above. Disclosure The Department intends to disclose its calculations and analysis performed to interested parties in this preliminary determination within five days of its public announcement, or if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Verification As provided in section 782(i)(1) of the Act, the Department intends to verify the information relied upon in making its final determination. [[Page 51389]] Public Comment Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance no later than seven days after the date on which the last verification report is issued in this investigation. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in case briefs, may be submitted no later than five days after the deadline date for case briefs.\10\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this investigation are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing, limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, whether any participant is a foreign national, and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and date to be determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. International Trade Commission Notification In accordance with section 703(f) of the Act, the Department will notify the International Trade Commission (ITC) of its determination. If the final determination is affirmative, the ITC will determine before the later of 120 days after the date of this preliminary determination or 45 days after the final determination. Notification to Interested Parties This determination is issued and published pursuant to sections 703(f) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(c). Dated: October 30, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I Scope of the Investigation The merchandise covered by this investigation is fine denier polyester staple fiber (fine denier PSF), not carded or combed, measuring less than 3.3 decitex (3 denier) in diameter. The scope covers all fine denier PSF, whether coated or uncoated. The following products are excluded from the scope: (1) PSF equal to or greater than 3.3. decitex (more than 3 denier, inclusive) currently classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 5503.20.0045 and 5503.20.0065. (2) Low-melt PSF defined as a bicomponent fiber with a polyester core and anouter, polyester sheath that melts at a significantly lower temperature than its inner polyester core currently classified under HTSUS subheading 5503.20.0015. Fine denier PSF is classifiable under the HTSUS subheading 5503.20.0025. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the investigation is dispositive. Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope Comments IV. Scope of the Investigation V. Injury Test VI. Subsidies Valuation VII. Benchmarks and Discount Rates VIII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences IX. Analysis of Programs X. Calculation of the All-Others Rate XI. ITC Notification XII. Disclosure and Public Comment XIII. Verification XIV. Conclusion [FR Doc. 2017-24078 Filed 11-3-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 213 / Monday, November 6, 2017 / Notices 51387
Consistent with an announced five days after the date for filing case Dated: October 31, 2017.
refinement to its assessment practice in briefs.13 Parties who submit case briefs Gary Taverman,
non-market economy cases, the or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
Department is not rescinding this encouraged to submit with each and Countervailing Duty Operations,
review but intends to complete the argument: (1) A statement of the issue; performing the non-exclusive functions and
review with respect to CS Wind Group duties of the Assistant Secretary for
(2) a brief summary of the argument;
for which it has preliminarily found no Enforcement and Compliance.
and (3) a table of authorities.14 Case and
shipments and issue appropriate rebuttal briefs should be filed using
[FR Doc. 2017–24080 Filed 11–3–17; 8:45 am]
instructions to CBP based on the final ACCESS.15 In order to be properly filed, BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
results of the review.8
ACCESS must successfully receive an
Assessment Rates electronically-filed document in its DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Upon issuance of the final results, the entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the
Department will determine, and CBP date on which it is due. International Trade Administration
shall assess, antidumping duties on all Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
appropriate entries covered by this interested parties who wish to request a [C–533–876]
review.9 The Department intends to hearing, or to participate if one is
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 requested, must submit a written Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber
days after the publication date of the request to the Assistant Secretary for From India: Preliminary Affirmative
final results of this review. For entries Enforcement and Compliance, filed Countervailing Duty Determination
of subject merchandise during the POR electronically via ACCESS, within 30
produced but not exported or exported AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
days after the date of publication of this International Trade Administration,
but not produced by CS Wind Group,
notice.16 Requests should contain: (1) Department of Commerce.
we will instruct CBP to liquidate
unreviewed entries at the Vietnam-wide The party’s name, address, and SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
rate if there was no rate for the telephone number; (2) the number of (the Department) preliminarily
intermediate company or companies participants; and (3) a list of issues to be determines that countervailable
involved in the transaction.10 For discussed. Issues raised in the hearing subsidies are being provided to
entries of subject merchandise during will be limited to those raised in the producers and exporters of fine denier
the POR produced and exported by CS respective case briefs. polyester staple fiber (fine denier PSF)
Wind Group, these entries continue to The Department intends to issue the from India. The period of investigation
be excluded from the order and will final results of this administrative is January 1, 2016, through December
remain enjoined pursuant to the terms review, including the results of its 31, 2016.
of the injunction during the pendency of analysis of the issues raised in any DATES: Applicable November 6, 2017.
any appeals process.11 written briefs, not later than 120 days
Additionally, for the companies for FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
after the date of publication of this Trisha Tran or Eli Lovely, AD/CVD
which this review is rescinded,
notice, unless extended, pursuant to Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and
antidumping duties shall be assessed at
rates equal to the cash deposit of section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Compliance, International Trade
estimated antidumping duties required Notification to Importers Administration, U.S. Department of
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
warehouse, for consumption, in This notice also serves as a NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i). preliminary reminder to importers of (202) 482–4852 or (202) 482–1593,
The Department intends to issue their responsibility under 19 CFR respectively.
appropriate assessment instructions to 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
CBP 15 days after publication of this regarding the reimbursement of
notice. antidumping duties prior to liquidation Background
Disclosure and Public Comment of the relevant entries during this This preliminary determination is
review period. Failure to comply with made in accordance with section 703(b)
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c),
this requirement could result in the of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
interested parties may submit case briefs
Secretary’s presumption that (the Act). The Department published the
no later than 30 days after the date of
reimbursement of antidumping duties notice of initiation of this investigation
publication of this notice.12 Rebuttal
occurred and the subsequent assessment on June 27, 2017.1 On August 8, 2017,
briefs, limited to issues raised in the
of double antidumping duties. the Department postponed the
case briefs, may be filed not later than
preliminary determination of this
Notification to Interested Parties investigation and the revised deadline is
8 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 We are issuing and publishing these now October 30, 2017.2 For a complete
FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011) and the description of the events that followed
‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section, below. results in accordance with sections
the initiation of this investigation, see
9 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
10 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
the Preliminary Decision
Pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 1 See Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from
11 See Utility Scale Wind Towers from the India and the People’s Republic of China: Initiation
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice of Court of Countervailing Duty Investigations, 82 FR 29028
Decision Not in Harmony with the Final (June 27,2017) (Initiation Notice).
Determination of Less Than Fair Value 13 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
2 See Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the
Investigation and Notice of Amended Final 14 See
People’s Republic of China and India:
Determination of Investigation, 82 FR 15493 (March 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
Postponement of Preliminary Determinations in the
15 See 19 CFR 351.303.
29, 2017) (Timken Notice). Countervailing Duty Investigations, 82 FR 37048
12 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii). 16 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). (August 8, 2017).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:48 Nov 03, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM 06NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_51600/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 213 / Monday, November 6, 2017 / Notices 51389
Public Comment Dated: October 30, 2017. SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset
Gary Taverman, review, the Department of Commerce
Case briefs or other written comments Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping (the Department) finds that revocation
may be submitted to the Assistant and Countervailing Duty Operations, of the antidumping duty (AD) order on
Secretary for Enforcement and performing the non-exclusive functions and tapered roller bearings and parts thereof,
Compliance no later than seven days duties of the Assistant Secretary for finished and unfinished (TRBs) from the
after the date on which the last Enforcement and Compliance. People’s Republic of China (PRC) would
verification report is issued in this Appendix I be likely to lead to continuation or
investigation. Rebuttal briefs, limited to recurrence of dumping. The magnitude
Scope of the Investigation
issues raised in case briefs, may be of the dumping margin likely to prevail
submitted no later than five days after The merchandise covered by this is indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of
investigation is fine denier polyester staple
the deadline date for case briefs.10 fiber (fine denier PSF), not carded or combed, Sunset Review’’ section of this notice.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and measuring less than 3.3 decitex (3 denier) in DATES: Applicable November 6, 2017.
(d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or diameter. The scope covers all fine denier
rebuttal briefs in this investigation are PSF, whether coated or uncoated. The FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
encouraged to submit with each following products are excluded from the Whitley Herndon; Office II, AD/CVD
argument: (1) A statement of the issue; scope: Operations, Enforcement and
(1) PSF equal to or greater than 3.3. decitex
(2) a brief summary of the argument; Compliance, International Trade
(more than 3 denier, inclusive) currently
and (3) a table of authorities. classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Administration, U.S. Department of
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
subheadings 5503.20.0045 and 5503.20.0065. NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
interested parties who wish to request a
(2) Low-melt PSF defined as a (202) 482–6274.
hearing, limited to issues raised in the bicomponent fiber with a polyester core and
case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a anouter, polyester sheath that melts at a SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
written request to the Assistant significantly lower temperature than its inner Background
Secretary for Enforcement and polyester core currently classified under
Compliance, U.S. Department of HTSUS subheading 5503.20.0015. On June 15, 1987, the Department
Fine denier PSF is classifiable under the
Commerce within 30 days after the date published the AD order on TRBs from
HTSUS subheading 5503.20.0025. Although
of publication of this notice. Requests the HTSUS subheadings are provided for the PRC.1 On July 3, 2017, the
should contain the party’s name, convenience and customs purposes, the Department initiated the fourth sunset
address, and telephone number, the written description of the scope of the review of the AD order on TRBs from
number of participants, whether any investigation is dispositive. the PRC pursuant to section 751(c) of
participant is a foreign national, and a the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
Appendix II
list of the issues to be discussed. If a (Act).2 On July 10, 2017, the Department
request for a hearing is made, the List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary received a timely notice of intent to
Decision Memorandum participate in the sunset review from the
Department intends to hold the hearing
at the U.S. Department of Commerce, I. Summary Timken Company (Timken), a domestic
II. Background producer and the petitioner in the TRBs
1401 Constitution Avenue NW., III. Scope Comments
Washington, DC 20230, at a time and less-than-fair-value investigation, within
IV. Scope of the Investigation the 15-day period specified in 19 CFR
date to be determined. Parties should V. Injury Test
351.218(d)(1)(i).3 On August 2, 2017,
confirm by telephone the date, time, and VI. Subsidies Valuation
VII. Benchmarks and Discount Rates Timken filed a timely substantive
location of the hearing two days before
VIII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and response with the Department pursuant
the scheduled date. to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4 The
Adverse Inferences
International Trade Commission IX. Analysis of Programs Department did not receive a
Notification X. Calculation of the All-Others Rate substantive response from any
XI. ITC Notification respondent interested party. As a result,
In accordance with section 703(f) of XII. Disclosure and Public Comment pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the
the Act, the Department will notify the XIII. Verification
XIV. Conclusion
Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2),
International Trade Commission (ITC) of
its determination. If the final [FR Doc. 2017–24078 Filed 11–3–17; 8:45 am] 1 See Antidumping Duty Order; Tapered Roller
determination is affirmative, the ITC BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished or Unfinished,
from the People’s Republic of China, 52 FR 22667
will determine before the later of 120 (June 15, 1987), as amended by Tapered Roller
days after the date of this preliminary Bearings from the People’s Republic of China;
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
determination or 45 days after the final Amendment to Final Determination of Sales at Less
determination. Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order in
International Trade Administration Accordance With Decision Upon Remand, 55 FR
Notification to Interested Parties 6669 (February 26, 1990) (Order).
[A–570–601] 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 82
This determination is issued and FR 80844 (July 3, 2017).
Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts 3 See Timken’s Letter, ‘‘Fourth Sunset Review of
published pursuant to sections 703(f) Thereof, Finished and Unfinished,
Pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
the Antidumping Order on Tapered Roller Bearings
and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR From the People’s Republic of China: from China (A–570–601): Notice of Intent to
351.205(c). Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Participate of the Timken Company,’’ dated July 10,
2017.
Sunset Review of the Antidumping 4 See Timken’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Review (4th
Duty Order Review) pursuant to Section 751(c) of the Tariff Act
of 1930 of the antidumping duty order on Tapered
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Roller Bearings from China (Case No. A–570–601)
10 See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 International Trade Administration, Substantive Response to the Notice of Initiation,’’
(for general filing requirements). Department of Commerce. dated August 2, 2017.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:48 Nov 03, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM 06NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_51600/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-11-07 10:30:24
Document Modified: 2017-11-07 10:30:24
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable November 6, 2017. | |
| Contact | Trisha Tran or Eli Lovely, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4852 or (202) 482-1593, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 51387 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR