82_FR_53652 82 FR 53432 - Airworthiness Criteria: Special Class Airworthiness Criteria for the FlightScan Corporation Camcopter S-100

82 FR 53432 - Airworthiness Criteria: Special Class Airworthiness Criteria for the FlightScan Corporation Camcopter S-100

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 220 (November 16, 2017)

Page Range53432-53433
FR Document2017-24866

The FAA announces the availability of and requests comments on proposed airworthiness criteria for the Unmanned Aircraft System, FlightScan Corporation, Camcopter S-100. This document provides proposed policy for airworthiness criteria to address the designation of applicable regulations and other criteria for special classes of aircraft. In addition to the proposed airworthiness criteria presented in this document, we are also referencing operational considerations that have been used to support the development of the airworthiness criteria. We consider these proposed criteria to be interim because we anticipate the evolution of new operational criteria will necessitate additional airworthiness criteria in order to allow for the operation of the Camcopter S-100 in the National Airspace System. When those additional operational criteria are further established, we will again provide public notice of proposed policy with additional airworthiness criteria along with changes incorporated to these criteria based on the public comments received.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 220 (Thursday, November 16, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 220 (Thursday, November 16, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 53432-53433]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24866]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 220 / Thursday, November 16, 2017 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 53432]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 21

[Docket No. FAA-2017-1058]


Airworthiness Criteria: Special Class Airworthiness Criteria for 
the FlightScan Corporation Camcopter S-100

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed interim airworthiness criteria.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA announces the availability of and requests comments on 
proposed airworthiness criteria for the Unmanned Aircraft System, 
FlightScan Corporation, Camcopter S-100. This document provides 
proposed policy for airworthiness criteria to address the designation 
of applicable regulations and other criteria for special classes of 
aircraft. In addition to the proposed airworthiness criteria presented 
in this document, we are also referencing operational considerations 
that have been used to support the development of the airworthiness 
criteria. We consider these proposed criteria to be interim because we 
anticipate the evolution of new operational criteria will necessitate 
additional airworthiness criteria in order to allow for the operation 
of the Camcopter S-100 in the National Airspace System. When those 
additional operational criteria are further established, we will again 
provide public notice of proposed policy with additional airworthiness 
criteria along with changes incorporated to these criteria based on the 
public comments received.

DATES: Send comments on or before December 18, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2017-1058 
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your 
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S. 
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room 
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery of Courier: Take comments to Docket 
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m., and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
    Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without 
change, to http://regulations.gov, including any personal information 
the commenter provides. Using the search function of the docket Web 
site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all comments 
received into any FAA docket, including the name of the individual 
sending the comment (or signing the comment for an association, 
business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement can 
be found in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 
19477-19478), as well as at http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at 
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions 
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140 
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Raymond Johnston, AIR-692, Federal 
Aviation Administration, Policy & Innovation Division, Small Airplane 
Standards Branch, Aircraft Certification Service, 901 Locust, Room 301, 
Kansas City, MO 64106, telephone (816) 329-4159, facsimile (816) 329-
4090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited

    We invite interested people to take part in the development of this 
policy by sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful 
comments reference a specific portion of the airworthiness criteria, 
explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting 
data. We ask that you send us two copies of written comments.
    We will consider all comments received on or before the closing 
date for comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is 
possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change 
these airworthiness criteria based on received comments or based on 
evolving operational criteria.

Background

    FlightScan Corporation (FlightScan) applied to the Federal Aviation 
Administration on June 1, 2015 for special class type certification 
under Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17(b) for the 
Camcopter S-100 Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS).
    The Camcopter S-100 UAS (S-100) consists of the unmanned aircraft 
(UA) and its associated elements (including communication links and the 
components that control the unmanned aircraft). The S-100 is a vertical 
take-off UAS that is of the traditional main/tail rotor helicopter 
design. The fuselage is made of carbon fiber and titanium. The S-100 is 
powered by a liquid cooled rotary engine and has a maximum take-off 
weight of 440 pounds which can include a maximum payload of up to 110 
pounds. The main rotor diameter is approximately 134 inches. The UAS is 
intended to be used to conduct airborne surveying of power transmission 
infrastructure using aerial photogrammetry.

Risk Classes

    To facilitate the establishment of an initial risk class for UAS, 
the FAA proposes a scale of risk based on kinetic energy.\1\ These 
proposed risk classes are based on logical break points between data 
clusters that parallel the existing classes of aircraft defined in AC 
23.1309-1E,\2\ the size boundaries for Light-Sport Aircraft, and the 
size boundaries in 14 CFR part 107. These energy based classifications 
for UAS are given in the definitions section of the Airworthiness 
Criteria for the FlightScan

[[Page 53433]]

Camcopter S-100, which has been placed in the docket. The S-100 would 
be considered Risk Class 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Within these risk categories, the FAA recognizes the 
opportunity to further define risk classes based on UAS operational 
considerations in the National Airspace System.
    \2\ http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/0/719E41E1D26099108625795D005D5302?OpenDocument&Highlight=ac%2023.1309-1e.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Operational Considerations

    The following operational considerations were evaluated during the 
development of this document:
    1. The S-100 would be used for power transmission line survey 
operations. It operates in a designated corridor and area within the 
right-of-way of the power transmission lines and is operationally 
limited to 100 feet above and laterally within 100 feet of the power 
line it would be surveying.
    2. While there is minimal population exposure within the power 
transmission line right-of-way, the mission path would cross several 
public highways and pass in close proximity to several neighborhoods 
with population densities of less than 950 people per square mile.
    3. The S-100 would operate Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS). 
BVLOS for this UAS is defined as those operations that do not conform 
to the definition of Visual Line of Sight (VLOS) in 14 CFR part 107.31 
at amendment 107-1.
    4. The radio control uplink and downlink would operate within 
frequencies approved by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
    5. This S-100 is designed to operate both autonomously and manually 
by the pilot-in-command (PIC).
    6. Minimum crew includes one PIC, one mission specialist, and one 
mission flight director.
    7. The minimum crew would operate only one S-100 at any time.
    8. The aircraft would remain within Radio Line of Sight (RLOS) of 
the control station. RLOS refers to the straight and unobstructed path 
between the transmitting and receiving antennas.
    9. The control station would be ground based.
    10. All crew would be FAA certified airmen with current and 
applicable medical credentials.
    11. All crew would successfully complete required crew training.
    12. Maintenance personnel would hold appropriate FAA maintenance 
certificates.
    13. Maintenance personnel would complete required maintenance 
training.

Unresolved Criteria

    The FAA's ongoing development of operational criteria will 
necessitate the incorporation of additional airworthiness criteria into 
the S-100 and may also necessitate future clarity of the airworthiness 
criteria published in the Airworthiness Criteria for the FlightScan 
Camcopter S-100, available in the docket. These may include but are not 
necessarily limited to the following--
    1. Command and Control (*) \3\--UAS control and communications link 
security is a key safety and interoperability requirement in 
integrating civil UAS into the National Airspace System NAS;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Criteria that have not yet been developed are identified 
with an asterisk (*).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Sense and Avoid (SAA) Equipage (*)--SAA systems could serve as a 
means of compliance with 14 CFR 91.113 right-of-way rules and others. 
Issues associated with the use of SAA systems to comply with 14 CFR 91 
requirements and others, if any, must be identified; and
    3. Noise Act Finding (*)--Noise standards have not been developed 
for UAS.

Proposed Airworthiness Criteria

    The FAA has not previously published airworthiness criteria for 
UAS. The FAA proposes new type certification airworthiness criteria for 
the FlightScan Camcopter S-100 as found in Airworthiness Criteria for 
the FlightScan Camcopter S-100, Revision 0, dated November 3, 2017. 
Locate the document at http://www.regulations.gov using docket number 
FAA-2017-1058.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on November 8, 2017.
Pat Mullen,
Manager, Small Airplane Standards Branch, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-24866 Filed 11-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P



                                                  53432

                                                  Proposed Rules                                                                                                Federal Register
                                                                                                                                                                Vol. 82, No. 220

                                                                                                                                                                Thursday, November 16, 2017



                                                  This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER                    the online instructions for sending your              that you send us two copies of written
                                                  contains notices to the public of the proposed          comments electronically.                              comments.
                                                  issuance of rules and regulations. The                    • Mail: Send comments to Docket                       We will consider all comments
                                                  purpose of these notices is to give interested          Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of                  received on or before the closing date
                                                  persons an opportunity to participate in the            Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey                 for comments. We will consider
                                                  rule making prior to the adoption of the final                                                                comments filed late if it is possible to
                                                  rules.
                                                                                                          Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
                                                                                                          Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC                 do so without incurring expense or
                                                                                                          20590–0001.                                           delay. We may change these
                                                  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION                              • Hand Delivery of Courier: Take                    airworthiness criteria based on received
                                                                                                          comments to Docket Operations in                      comments or based on evolving
                                                  Federal Aviation Administration                         Room W12–140 of the West Building                     operational criteria.
                                                                                                          Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey                       Background
                                                  14 CFR Part 21                                          Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
                                                                                                          a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday through                        FlightScan Corporation (FlightScan)
                                                  [Docket No. FAA–2017–1058]                                                                                    applied to the Federal Aviation
                                                                                                          Friday, except Federal holidays.
                                                                                                            • Fax: Fax comments to Docket                       Administration on June 1, 2015 for
                                                  Airworthiness Criteria: Special Class                                                                         special class type certification under
                                                  Airworthiness Criteria for the                          Operations at 202–493–2251.
                                                                                                            Privacy: The FAA will post all                      Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations
                                                  FlightScan Corporation Camcopter                                                                              (14 CFR) 21.17(b) for the Camcopter
                                                  S–100                                                   comments it receives, without change,
                                                                                                          to http://regulations.gov, including any              S–100 Unmanned Aircraft System
                                                  AGENCY: Federal Aviation                                personal information the commenter                    (UAS).
                                                  Administration (FAA), DOT.                              provides. Using the search function of                  The Camcopter S–100 UAS (S–100)
                                                  ACTION: Notice of proposed interim                      the docket Web site, anyone can find                  consists of the unmanned aircraft (UA)
                                                  airworthiness criteria.                                 and read the electronic form of all                   and its associated elements (including
                                                                                                          comments received into any FAA                        communication links and the
                                                  SUMMARY:    The FAA announces the                       docket, including the name of the                     components that control the unmanned
                                                  availability of and requests comments                   individual sending the comment (or                    aircraft). The S–100 is a vertical take-off
                                                  on proposed airworthiness criteria for                  signing the comment for an association,               UAS that is of the traditional main/tail
                                                  the Unmanned Aircraft System,                           business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s                   rotor helicopter design. The fuselage is
                                                  FlightScan Corporation, Camcopter                       complete Privacy Act Statement can be                 made of carbon fiber and titanium. The
                                                  S–100. This document provides                           found in the Federal Register published               S–100 is powered by a liquid cooled
                                                  proposed policy for airworthiness                       on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),                rotary engine and has a maximum take-
                                                  criteria to address the designation of                  as well as at http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.             off weight of 440 pounds which can
                                                  applicable regulations and other criteria                 Docket: Background documents or                     include a maximum payload of up to
                                                  for special classes of aircraft. In addition            comments received may be read at                      110 pounds. The main rotor diameter is
                                                  to the proposed airworthiness criteria                  http://www.regulations.gov at any time.               approximately 134 inches. The UAS is
                                                  presented in this document, we are also                 Follow the online instructions for                    intended to be used to conduct airborne
                                                  referencing operational considerations                  accessing the docket or go to the Docket              surveying of power transmission
                                                  that have been used to support the                      Operations in Room W12–140 of the                     infrastructure using aerial
                                                  development of the airworthiness                        West Building Ground Floor at 1200                    photogrammetry.
                                                  criteria. We consider these proposed                    New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,                    Risk Classes
                                                  criteria to be interim because we                       DC, between 9 a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday
                                                  anticipate the evolution of new                                                                                 To facilitate the establishment of an
                                                                                                          through Friday, except Federal holidays.
                                                  operational criteria will necessitate                                                                         initial risk class for UAS, the FAA
                                                                                                          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
                                                  additional airworthiness criteria in                                                                          proposes a scale of risk based on kinetic
                                                                                                          Raymond Johnston, AIR–692, Federal                    energy.1 These proposed risk classes are
                                                  order to allow for the operation of the                 Aviation Administration, Policy &
                                                  Camcopter S–100 in the National                                                                               based on logical break points between
                                                                                                          Innovation Division, Small Airplane                   data clusters that parallel the existing
                                                  Airspace System. When those additional                  Standards Branch, Aircraft Certification
                                                  operational criteria are further                                                                              classes of aircraft defined in AC
                                                                                                          Service, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas                 23.1309–1E,2 the size boundaries for
                                                  established, we will again provide                      City, MO 64106, telephone (816) 329–
                                                  public notice of proposed policy with                                                                         Light-Sport Aircraft, and the size
                                                                                                          4159, facsimile (816) 329–4090.                       boundaries in 14 CFR part 107. These
                                                  additional airworthiness criteria along
                                                                                                          SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                            energy based classifications for UAS are
                                                  with changes incorporated to these
                                                  criteria based on the public comments                   Comments Invited                                      given in the definitions section of the
                                                                                                                                                                Airworthiness Criteria for the FlightScan
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                  received.                                                 We invite interested people to take
                                                  DATES: Send comments on or before                       part in the development of this policy                  1 Within these risk categories, the FAA recognizes
                                                  December 18, 2017.                                      by sending written comments, data, or                 the opportunity to further define risk classes based
                                                  ADDRESSES: Send comments identified                     views. The most helpful comments                      on UAS operational considerations in the National
                                                                                                          reference a specific portion of the                   Airspace System.
                                                  by docket number FAA–2017–1058                                                                                  2 http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_
                                                  using any of the following methods:                     airworthiness criteria, explain the                   Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/0/
                                                    • Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to                  reason for any recommended change,                    719E41E1D26099108625795D005D5302?
                                                  http://www.regulations.gov and follow                   and include supporting data. We ask                   OpenDocument&Highlight=ac%2023.1309-1e.



                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:41 Nov 15, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00001   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\16NOP1.SGM   16NOP1


                                                                      Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 220 / Thursday, November 16, 2017 / Proposed Rules                                         53433

                                                  Camcopter S–100, which has been                         in the Airworthiness Criteria for the                 intended for any person who is
                                                  placed in the docket. The S–100 would                   FlightScan Camcopter S–100, available                 responsible for a conclusion that a
                                                  be considered Risk Class 3.                             in the docket. These may include but                  substance may be used in food on the
                                                                                                          are not necessarily limited to the                    basis of the generally recognized as safe
                                                  Operational Considerations
                                                                                                          following—                                            (GRAS) provision of the Federal Food,
                                                     The following operational                               1. Command and Control (*) 3—UAS                   Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act)
                                                  considerations were evaluated during                    control and communications link                       when that person convenes a panel of
                                                  the development of this document:                       security is a key safety and                          experts (‘‘GRAS panel’’) to
                                                     1. The S–100 would be used for                       interoperability requirement in                       independently evaluate whether the
                                                  power transmission line survey                          integrating civil UAS into the National               available scientific data, information,
                                                  operations. It operates in a designated                 Airspace System NAS;                                  and methods establish that the
                                                  corridor and area within the right-of-                     2. Sense and Avoid (SAA) Equipage                  substance is safe under the conditions of
                                                  way of the power transmission lines and                 (*)—SAA systems could serve as a                      its intended use in human food or
                                                  is operationally limited to 100 feet                    means of compliance with 14 CFR                       animal food. This draft guidance
                                                  above and laterally within 100 feet of                  91.113 right-of-way rules and others.                 provides our current thinking on best
                                                  the power line it would be surveying.                   Issues associated with the use of SAA                 practices to identify GRAS panel
                                                     2. While there is minimal population                 systems to comply with 14 CFR 91                      members who have appropriate and
                                                  exposure within the power transmission                  requirements and others, if any, must be              balanced expertise; to take steps to
                                                  line right-of-way, the mission path                     identified; and                                       reduce the risk that bias (or the
                                                  would cross several public highways                        3. Noise Act Finding (*)—Noise                     appearance of bias) will affect the
                                                  and pass in close proximity to several                  standards have not been developed for                 credibility of the GRAS panel’s output
                                                  neighborhoods with population                           UAS.                                                  (often called a ‘‘GRAS panel report’’),
                                                  densities of less than 950 people per                                                                         including the assessment of potential
                                                                                                          Proposed Airworthiness Criteria
                                                  square mile.                                                                                                  GRAS panel members for conflict of
                                                     3. The S–100 would operate Beyond                       The FAA has not previously                         interest and the appearance of conflict
                                                  Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS). BVLOS                     published airworthiness criteria for                  of interest; and to limit the data and
                                                  for this UAS is defined as those                        UAS. The FAA proposes new type                        information provided to a GRAS panel
                                                  operations that do not conform to the                   certification airworthiness criteria for              to public information (e.g., by not
                                                  definition of Visual Line of Sight                      the FlightScan Camcopter S–100 as                     providing the GRAS panel with
                                                  (VLOS) in 14 CFR part 107.31 at                         found in Airworthiness Criteria for the               information such as trade secret
                                                  amendment 107–1.                                        FlightScan Camcopter S–100, Revision                  information).
                                                     4. The radio control uplink and                      0, dated November 3, 2017. Locate the
                                                  downlink would operate within                           document at http://www.regulations.gov                DATES: Although you can comment on
                                                  frequencies approved by the Federal                     using docket number FAA–2017–1058.                    any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
                                                  Communications Commission (FCC).                          Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on                 10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that we consider
                                                     5. This S–100 is designed to operate                 November 8, 2017.                                     your comment on this draft guidance
                                                  both autonomously and manually by the                   Pat Mullen,                                           before we issue the final version of the
                                                  pilot-in-command (PIC).                                 Manager, Small Airplane Standards Branch,             guidance, submit either electronic or
                                                     6. Minimum crew includes one PIC,                    Aircraft Certification Service.                       written comments by May 15, 2018. For
                                                  one mission specialist, and one mission                 [FR Doc. 2017–24866 Filed 11–15–17; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                                                                                comments related to the collection of
                                                  flight director.                                                                                              information provisions in this draft
                                                                                                          BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
                                                     7. The minimum crew would operate                                                                          guidance, submit either electronic or
                                                  only one S–100 at any time.                                                                                   written comments by January 16, 2018.
                                                     8. The aircraft would remain within                                                                        ADDRESSES:    You may submit comments
                                                  Radio Line of Sight (RLOS) of the                       DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
                                                                                                          HUMAN SERVICES                                        as follows:
                                                  control station. RLOS refers to the
                                                  straight and unobstructed path between                                                                        Electronic Submissions
                                                                                                          Food and Drug Administration
                                                  the transmitting and receiving antennas.
                                                                                                                                                                  Submit electronic comments in the
                                                     9. The control station would be                      21 CFR Parts 170 and 570                              following way:
                                                  ground based.
                                                     10. All crew would be FAA certified                  [Docket No. FDA–2017–D–0085]                            • Federal eRulemaking Portal:
                                                  airmen with current and applicable                                                                            https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
                                                  medical credentials.                                    Best Practices for Convening a                        instructions for submitting comments.
                                                     11. All crew would successfully                      Generally Recognized as Safe Panel:                   Comments submitted electronically,
                                                  complete required crew training.                        Draft Guidance for Industry;                          including attachments, to https://
                                                     12. Maintenance personnel would                      Availability                                          www.regulations.gov will be posted to
                                                  hold appropriate FAA maintenance                                                                              the docket unchanged. Because your
                                                                                                          AGENCY:    Food and Drug Administration,
                                                  certificates.                                                                                                 comment will be made public, you are
                                                                                                          HHS.
                                                     13. Maintenance personnel would                                                                            solely responsible for ensuring that your
                                                                                                          ACTION:   Notification of availability.               comment does not include any
                                                  complete required maintenance
                                                  training.                                               SUMMARY:   The Food and Drug                          confidential information that you or a
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                                                                          Administration (FDA, we, or Agency) is                third party may not wish to be posted,
                                                  Unresolved Criteria                                                                                           such as medical information, your or
                                                                                                          announcing the availability of a draft
                                                    The FAA’s ongoing development of                      guidance for industry entitled ‘‘Best                 anyone else’s Social Security number, or
                                                  operational criteria will necessitate the               Practices for Convening a GRAS Panel.’’               confidential business information, such
                                                  incorporation of additional                             This draft guidance document is                       as a manufacturing process. Please note
                                                  airworthiness criteria into the S–100                                                                         that if you include your name, contact
                                                  and may also necessitate future clarity                   3 Criteria that have not yet been developed are     information, or other information that
                                                  of the airworthiness criteria published                 identified with an asterisk (*).                      identifies you in the body of your


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:41 Nov 15, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00002   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\16NOP1.SGM   16NOP1



Document Created: 2017-11-16 03:53:38
Document Modified: 2017-11-16 03:53:38
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionNotice of proposed interim airworthiness criteria.
DatesSend comments on or before December 18, 2017.
ContactMr. Raymond Johnston, AIR-692, Federal Aviation Administration, Policy & Innovation Division, Small Airplane Standards Branch, Aircraft Certification Service, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, MO 64106, telephone (816) 329-4159, facsimile (816) 329- 4090.
FR Citation82 FR 53432 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR