82 FR 53563 - Notice of Submission of Proposed Information Collection to OMB
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 220 (November 16, 2017)
Office of the Secretary
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 220 (November 16, 2017)
| Page Range | 53563-53566 | |
| FR Document | 2017-24834 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 220 (Thursday, November 16, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 53563-53566] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-24834] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of the Secretary [OST Docket No. DOT-OST-2010-0140] Notice of Submission of Proposed Information Collection to OMB AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Notice and request for comments. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, as amended, this notice announces the Department of Transportation's (Department) intention to reinstate an Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number for the collection and posting of certain aviation [[Page 53564]] consumer protection-related information from U.S. carriers and foreign carriers. On April 25, 2011, the DOT issued a final rule that, among other things, extended existing consumer protection requirements that previously applied only to U.S. carriers to foreign carriers and required that certain U.S. and foreign air carriers report tarmac delay information to the DOT for passenger operations that experience a tarmac delay time of 3 hours or more at a U.S. airport (See, DOT-OST- 2010-0140). This request seeks to reinstate the control number that is associated with the information collection requirements in that rule, OMB Control Number 2105-0561. In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice also announces that the request for reinstatement of an OMB Control Number for the Information Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below is being forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comments. A Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting comments on the following information collection was published on May 22, 2017 (82 FR 97 at 23486). DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by December 18, 2017. Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding this proposal. ADDRESSES: Send comments regarding the burden estimate, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for the Office of the Secretary of Transportation, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503. Comments may also be sent via email to OMB at the following address: [email protected]. To ensure that you do not duplicate your docket submissions, please submit them by only one of the following means:Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W-12/140, Washington, DC 20590-0001; Hand delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W-12/140, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daeleen Chesley, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings (C-70), Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590, 202-366-9342 (voice) 202- 366-7152 (fax) or [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title: Submission of Miscellaneous Information Collection Systems as Required by the Department's Rules to Enhance Airline Passenger Protections. OMB Control Number: 2105-0561. On April 25, 2011, the Department issued a rule to enhance airline passenger protections that, among other things, extended to foreign carriers the requirement to post tarmac delay plans, customer service plans, and contracts of carriage on their Web sites. This requirement had previously only applied to U.S. carriers. Airlines are also required to adopt a Customer Service Plan, audit adherence to the plan annually, and retain the results for two years. In addition, a prior rule issued on December 30, 2009, required that each reporting air carrier (i.e., currently U.S. carriers that account for at least 1 percent of domestic scheduled passenger revenues) display on its Web site information on each listed flights' on-time performance for the previous month for both the carrier's flights and those of its non- reporting code-share carriers. The rules also require that U.S. air carriers that operate passenger service and foreign air carriers that operate scheduled passenger service to or from the U.S. retain for two years certain information about any ground delay that lasts at least three hours. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) and its implementing regulations, 5 CFR part 1320, require Federal agencies to issue two notices seeking public comment on information collection activities before OMB may approve paperwork packages. 44 U.S.C. 3506, 3507; 5 CFR 1320.5, 1320.8(d)(1), 1320.12. On May 22, 2017, OST published a 60-day notice in the Federal Register soliciting comment on ICRs for which the agency was seeking OMB approval (82 FR 97 at 23486). OST received one comment after issuing this notice. The commenter, Airport Council International (ACI) strongly supported the renewal of this control number. Accordingly, the Department announces that these information collection activities have been re-evaluated and certified under 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and forwarded to OMB for review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12(c). Before OMB decides whether to approve these proposed collections of information, it must provide 30 days for public comment. 44 U.S.C. 3507(b); 5 CFR 1320.12(d). Federal law requires OMB to approve or disapprove paperwork packages between 30 and 60 days after the 30-day notice is published. 44 U.S.C. 3507(b)-(c); 5 CFR 1320.12(d); see also 60 FR 44978, 44983 (Aug. 29, 1995). The 30-day notice informs the regulated community to file relevant comments to OMB and affords the agency adequate time to digest public comments before it renders a decision. 60 FR 44983 (Aug. 29, 1995). Therefore, respondents should submit their respective comments to OMB within 30 days of publication to best ensure their full consideration. 5 CFR 1320.12(c); see also 60 FR 44983 (Aug. 29, 1995). This notice addresses five information collection requirements concerning information collection requirements set forth in the Department's airline passenger protection rules. The reinstated OMB control number will be applicable to all information collection systems set forth in this notice. For each of these information collections, the title, a description of the respondents, and an estimate of the annual recordkeeping and periodic reporting burden (rounded to the nearest hour) are set forth below: 1. Requirement to post customer service plans and contracts of carriage on a carrier's Web site. (259.2 and 259.6). Title: Posting of Customer Service Plan and Contract of Carriage on Web site. Respondents: U.S. carriers that operate scheduled passenger or public charter service and foreign air carriers operating scheduled passenger or public charter service to or from the United States, using any aircraft with a designed seating capacity of 30 or more seats. Applicable to U.S. carriers that have a Web site and foreign carriers that have a Web site marketed toward U.S. consumers. Estimated Number of Respondents: 45 U.S. airlines and 65 foreign carriers. Estimated Annual Burden on Respondents: 15 minutes per year for each U.S. carrier and foreign carrier. The estimate was calculated by multiplying the estimated time (15 min) to post an updated copy of the carrier's customer service and/or contract of carriage on its Web site per year (if changes are made) by the number of updates per carrier in each year (1) for U.S and foreign carriers. Estimated Total Burden on Respondents: 28 hours (1,680 minutes, average of 15 minutes per U.S. carrier to post plans and contracts of carriage on Web site). Frequency: One time per respondent. [[Page 53565]] 2. Requirement to retain for two years information about any tarmac delay that lasts at least three hours. (259.2 and 259.4). Title: Retaining Ground Delay Information. Respondents: U.S. carriers that operate or market scheduled or public charter passenger service using any aircraft with a designed seating capacity of 30 or more seats, and foreign air carriers that operate or market scheduled or public charter passenger service to and from the United States using any aircraft with a designed seating capacity of 30 or more seats. To be covered, the tarmac delay must have occurred at a U.S. large hub, medium hub, small hub or non-hub airport. Estimated Number of Respondents: 61 U.S. and 93 foreign carriers. Estimated Annual Burden on Respondents: A maximum of 88 hours (5,280 minutes) for a U.S. respondent and a maximum of 32 hours (1,920 minutes) for a foreign respondent. The estimate was calculated multiplying the estimated time to retain information about one ground delay (2 hours) by the total number of ground delay incidents lasting at least three hours per U.S. respondent (a maximum of 44 incidents, derived from analysis of tarmac delays for CY2016). For foreign respondents, the estimate was similarly calculated by multiplying the estimated time to retain information about one ground delay (4 hours) by the total number of ground delay incidents lasting at least three hours for CY2016 (a maximum of 8 incidents). Estimated Total Annual Burden: A maximum of 680 hours (40,800 minutes) for all respondents. For U.S. carriers, the subtotal was determined by multiplying the sum of the total per report time (2 hours) for U.S. carriers by the total number of CY2016 ground delay incidents lasting at least three hours for all U.S. carriers (84 total incidents). For foreign carriers the subtotal was determined by multiplying the per report time (4 hours) for foreign carriers multiplied by the total number of ground delay incidents lasting at least three hours for the foreign carriers (168 total incidents). The estimate was calculated by adding the sum of the two subtotals for all CY2016 tarmac delays lasting at least three hours (168 hours for U.S. carriers plus 512 hours for foreign carriers). Frequency: A maximum of 44 ground delay information sets to retain per year for a single respondent. (N.b. Some air carriers may not experience any ground delay incidents of at least three hours in each year, while one air carrier experienced 44 three-hour plus delays in CY2016 per data reported to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics). 3. Requirement that certain U.S. and foreign air carriers retain for two years the results of its annual self-audit of its compliance with its Customer Service Plan. (259.2 and 259.5) Title: Retaining Self-audit of Customer Service Plan. Respondents: U.S. carriers that operate scheduled passenger service using any aircraft with a designed seating capacity of 30 or more seats, and foreign air carriers that operate scheduled passenger service to and from the United States using any aircraft with a designed seating capacity of 30 or more seats. Applicable to U.S. carriers that have a Web site and foreign carriers that have a Web site marketed toward U.S. consumers. Number of Respondents: 45 U.S. and 65 foreign carriers. Estimated Annual Burden on Respondents: 15 minutes per year for each respondent. The estimate was calculated by multiplying the estimated time to retain a copy of the carrier's self-audit of its compliance with its Customer Service Plan by the number of audits per carrier in a given year (1). Estimated Total Annual Burden: A maximum of 28 (1,680 minutes) for all respondents. The estimate was calculated by multiplying the time in a given year for each carrier to retain a copy of its self-audit of its compliance with its Customer Service Plan (15 minutes) by the total number of covered carriers (115 carriers). Frequency: One information set to retain per year for each respondent. 4. Requires that each large U.S. carrier display on its Web site, at a point before the consumer selects a flight for purchase, the following information for each listed flight regarding its on-time performance during the last reported month: The percentage of arrivals that were on time (within 15 minutes of scheduled arrival time), the percentage of arrivals that were more than 30 minutes late (with special highlighting if the flight was more than 30 minutes late more than 50 percent of the time), and the percentage of flight cancellations if the flight is cancelled more than 5% of the time. In addition, a marketing/reporting carrier display delay data for its non- reporting code-share carrier(s). (234.11) Title: Displaying On-time performance Information on Carrier Web site. Respondents: Currently every U.S. carrier that accounts for at least one percent of scheduled passenger revenue and maintains a Web site. For travel on or after January 1, 2018, every U.S. carrier that accounts for at least 0.5 percent and less than 1.0 percent of domestic scheduled passenger revenue and that market flights directly to consumers via a Web site. Number of Respondents: 10 carriers presently; 11 carriers beginning January 1, 2018. Estimated Annual Burden on Respondents: 2 hours per month (24 hours) to cover both updates of a carrier's own delay data and updates of code-share delay data. Estimated total annual burden: No more than 264 hours (15,840 minutes) a year for all respondents. The estimate was calculated by multiplying the total number of hours per carrier per year for management of data links (24) by the number of currently covered carriers (11). For the first year, the annual burden will also include the 4,673 (280,380) hours for one newly reporting carrier. Frequency: Updating information for each flight listed on Web site 12 times per year (1 time per month) for each respondent (for both own carrier delay data and code-share delay data). 5. Requirement that certain carriers report tarmac delay data for tarmac delays exceeding 3 hours to the Department monthly. (244.2) Title: Reporting Tarmac Delay Data for Tarmac Delays Exceeding 3 Hours (to the extent such information is not reported by U.S. carriers under 14 CFR part 234). Respondents: U.S. carriers that operate scheduled passenger service or public charter service using any aircraft with a designed seating capacity of 30 or more seats, and foreign air carriers that operate scheduled passenger service to and from the United States using any aircraft with a designed seating capacity of 30 or more seats. To be covered, the tarmac delay must have occurred at a U.S. large hub, medium hub, small hub or non-hub airport. Number of Respondents: 61 U.S. and 70 foreign carriers. Estimated Annual Burden on Respondents: 0.0 to 22.0 hours per U.S. respondent (the latter if 44 three-hour plus tarmac delays must be reported) and 0.0 to 4 hours per foreign respondent (the latter if 8 three-hour plus tarmac delays must be reported). This is estimating that each report takes 30 minutes to submit. Estimated Total Annual Burden: 106 hours (6,360 minutes) for all respondents. Frequency: One information set to submit per incident for each respondent that experiences a tarmac delay of 3 hours or more (212 three-hour plus tarmac delay reports total were [[Page 53566]] submitted in CY16 to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics). We invite comments on (a) whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Department, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. All comments will also become a matter of public record on the docket. Issued this 8th day of November 2017, at Washington, DC. Claire W. Barrett, DOT Chief Privacy & Information Governance Officer, Office of the Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017-24834 Filed 11-15-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 220 / Thursday, November 16, 2017 / Notices 53563
pressure excursions on any desiccated differential scanning calorimetry covered inflators. Ford has provided no
PSDI–5 inflator, and that ‘‘[t]he analysis). Id. compelling argument for the Agency to
maximum primary chamber pressure deviate from 49 CFR 556.4(b)(5).
IV. Request for Deferral of
that Takata measured’’ in covered Ford For these reasons, NHTSA denies
Determination
inflators was about 15 MPa lower than Ford’s request for a deferral of the
that measured in a covered Nissan Ford has requested that NHTSA allow NHTSA’s decision on Ford’s Petition.
inflator (which exhibited primary it additional time before deciding on its The Agency will decide on Ford’s
chamber pressure exceeding 60 MPa). Petition—specifically, until March 31, Petition without consideration of Ford’s
Id. at 14. 2018—so that it may ‘‘complete its planned additional efforts as outlined in
Second, and relatedly, Ford contends intensified and expanded inflator field its Petition. Nevertheless, NHTSA
‘‘[t]here are design differences’’ in the study, aging assessment, and testing on recognizes Ford’s plans to further
covered Ford inflators when compared additional samples and vehicle types to evaluate the safety of Takata calcium-
to the covered Nissan inflators, and that evaluate the performance of the Takata sulfate desiccated PSDI–5 driver-side
such differences may explain desiccated PSDI–5 driver airbag airbag inflators, and encourages Ford to
differences observed between the two inflators.’’ Id. at 19. In making this move forward with those plans as
inflator variants during testing. Id. In request, Ford appears to acknowledge described in its Petition—particularly
short, Ford cites its inflator variant as the available data may not yet be given the concern about these inflators
having ‘‘fewer potential moisture sufficient for the Agency to grant its that Ford has expressed.
sources’’ because the inflators contain Petition. Indeed, Ford notes that while Accordingly, NHTSA hereby gives
only two, foil-wrapped auto-ignition its results to date are ‘‘good news for the notice of its receipt of Ford’s Petition for
tablets (instead of three that are not foil- safety’’ of users of one of its six affected a Determination of Inconsequentiality
wrapped), contain divider disk foil tape, vehicle models—the Ranger—‘‘the and Request for Deferral of
and utilize certain EPDM generate results on the Nissan design inflators are Determination Regarding Certain Ford
cushion material (instead of ceramic) of concern.’’ Id. Vehicles Equipped with Takata PSDI–5
The Agency recognizes Ford’s plans
that ‘‘reduces generate movement over Desiccated Driver Airbag Inflators. And
to expand its investigation and to secure
time, maintains generate integrity, and it is hereby Ordered that:
a supply of remedy inflators for affected
leads to consistent and predictable burn 1. The period for public comment on
vehicles if it becomes needed. See id. at
rates.’’ Id. at 15–16 (providing table). Ford’s Petition shall run from the
3, 10. However, 49 CFR 556.4(b)(5)
The remainder of Ford’s Petition publication of this decision through
provides that an inconsequentiality
explains its ‘‘commit[ment] to further December 18, 2017; and
petition must set forth all data, views,
investigation of PSDI–5 airbag 2. Ford’s request for a deferral of
and arguments supporting that petition,
inflators.’’ See id. at 16–18. Because of and Ford does not adequately justify NHTSA’s decision on Ford’s Petition, so
this stated concern, including about why this provision does not preclude that Ford may complete its intensified
data pertaining to the covered Nissan deferral here. and expanded inflator field study, aging
inflators, ‘‘Ford is expanding the scope Specifically, NHTSA does not find assessment, and testing on additional
of the sampling and is involving leading Ford’s request for deferral reasonable samples and vehicle types, is Denied.
industry experts to assess any potential under the circumstances or supported Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30101, et seq., 30118,
risks from desiccated PSDI–5 inflators by the testing and data it has collected 30120(h), 30162, 30166(b)(1), 30166(g)(1);
in Ford products.’’ Id. at 16. Ford to date. Indeed, Ford does not provide delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95(a); 49
outlines a two-pronged plan for this an explanation for why it has not CFR parts 556, 573, 577.
expansion. First, Ford describes a parts- already undertaken the expansive Issued: November 9, 2017.
acquisition program ‘‘to gather investigation it now proposes, and Stephen P. Wood,
approximately 6,000 desiccated PSDI–5 Ford’s past efforts to evaluate the safety Acting Chief Counsel.
driver airbag inflators’’ from certain of the covered inflators do not support [FR Doc. 2017–24829 Filed 11–15–17; 8:45 am]
model year vehicles in areas with high granting a deferral. NHTSA requested BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
absolute humidity for what appears to Ford’s assistance in evaluating Takata
be all vehicle lines in which the covered calcium-sulfate desiccated PSDI–5
inflators were originally installed.6 Id. at driver-side airbag inflators in February DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
17. And second, Ford describes a 2016, and over seventeen months later
continuation of inflator testing and only about 400 covered Ford inflators Office of the Secretary
engineering analysis, which will engage have been tested. Further, while the
third-party experts for independent [OST Docket No. DOT–OST–2010–0140]
covered Ford inflators were original
assessments. Id. at 17–18. The testing equipment in six vehicle models
will include various engineering Notice of Submission of Proposed
(Ranger, Fusion, MKZ, Milan, Edge, and Information Collection to OMB
analyses (comparisons of design within MKX), all approximately 400 inflators
the PSDI–5 family, statistical harvested in Ford’s field-recovery AGENCY: Office of the Secretary,
assessments, and ballistic modeling), program were from the same vehicle Department of Transportation (DOT).
inflator testing (CT scanning and model (the Ranger). Moreover, the ACTION: Notice and request for
inflator disassembly), and propellant number of inflators tested under Ford’s comments.
testing (moisture content, closed-bomb
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
program was less than half the number
burn rate, X-ray micro-computer tested under Nissan’s program, and SUMMARY: In accordance with the
tomography, thermogravimetric/ about seven percent of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, as
approximately 6,000 inflators Ford now amended, this notice announces the
6 Ford’s Petition explicitly lists six vehicle lines,
proposes to test in only about seven Department of Transportation’s
comprising all affected Ford models except for the months. (Department) intention to reinstate an
Fusion. See Petition at 17. However, one of the six
vehicle lines is simply listed as ‘‘2006–2007 MY
It is difficult to reconcile Ford’s Office of Management and Budget
Ford.’’ Presumably, this refers to certain MY Ford ambitious plan with its prior approach (OMB) control number for the collection
Fusions. toward evaluating the safety of the and posting of certain aviation
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:52 Nov 15, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00114 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM 16NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_53783/page/1.svg)
![53566 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 220 / Thursday, November 16, 2017 / Notices
submitted in CY16 to the Bureau of protect Veterans’ privacy and personal any closing remarks and guidance from
Transportation Statistics). information. the Board Chair.
We invite comments on (a) whether The Board is a statutory board On Thursday, December 7, the Board
the collection of information is established by the West Los Angeles will convene an open session from 9:00
necessary for the proper performance of Leasing Act of 2016 on September 29, a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and will begin with
the functions of the Department, 2016. The purpose of the Board is to reports or comments from the
including whether the information will provide advice and make subcommittee facilitated discussion,
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of recommendations to the Secretary of and discussion of topics and schedule
the Department’s estimate of the burden Veterans Affairs on: Identifying the for upcoming meetings. Additionally,
of the proposed information collection; goals of the community and Veteran time will be allocated for receiving
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility partnership; improving services and public comments on December 7, at 9:45
and clarity of the information to be outcomes for Veterans, members of the a.m. Public comments shall be limited
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the Armed Forces, and the families of such to five minutes each. Individuals
burden of the collection of information Veterans and members; and on the wishing to make oral statements before
on respondents, including the use of implementation of the Draft Master Plan the Board will be accommodated on a
automated collection techniques or approved by the Secretary on January first come first serve basis. Individuals
other forms of information technology. 28, 2016, and on the creation and who speak are invited to submit a 1–2
All comments will also become a matter implementation of any successor master page summary of their comments at the
of public record on the docket. plans. time of the meeting for inclusion in the
Issued this 8th day of November 2017, at On Tuesday, December 5, the Board official record. The Board will accept
Washington, DC. will convene an open session from 9:00 written comments from interested
Claire W. Barrett, a.m. to 4:00 p.m. The agenda will parties on issues outlined in the meeting
DOT Chief Privacy & Information Governance include briefings from officials at the agenda, as well as other issues affecting
Officer, Office of the Secretary. VA and other VA entities to include: identifying the goals of the community
[FR Doc. 2017–24834 Filed 11–15–17; 8:45 am] Training on Federal advisory and Veteran partnership; improving
committees and Ethics; guidance to the services and outcomes for Veterans,
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
Board members on their roles and members of the Armed Forces, and the
responsibilities. The Board will be families of such Veterans and members;
broken into small groups to participate and on the implementation of the Draft
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS in a facilitated working-group activity Master Plan. Such comments should be
AFFAIRS for the balance of the day, and report sent to Eugene W. Skinner, Jr.,
out to the full committee to complete Designated Federal Officer, Veterans
Veterans and Community Oversight the day. Experience Office via email to
and Engagement Board, Notice of Eugene.Skinner@va.gov. Note:
Meeting On Wednesday, December 6, the Videotaping and/or digital recording is
Board will convene an open session not permitted at the meeting unless
The Department of Veterans Affairs from 9:00 a.m. to 11:15 a.m. The agenda allowed by the Designated Federal
(VA) gives notice under the Federal will include briefings on the West LA Officer.
Advisory Committee Act that the Leasing Act of 2016, and a detailed Any member of the public seeking
Veterans and Community Oversight and briefing on the Draft Master Plan (with additional information should contact
Engagement Board (Board) will meet on updates). From 12:30 p.m. to 1:30 p.m., Mr. Skinner, via email at
December 5–7, 2017, at 11301 Wilshire the Board will convene in a closed Eugene.Skinner@va.gov or by phone at
Boulevard, Building 500, Room 1281, session as it tours the West LA Campus. (202) 631–7645.
Los Angeles, CA, from 9:00 a.m. until The Board will reconvene an open
4:00 p.m. (Pacific). Sessions are open to session at 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. at Dated: November 13, 2017.
the public, except when the Committee which, the Board members will once Jelessa M. Burney,
is conducting tours of VA facilities, again participate in Committee Federal Advisory Committee Management
participating in off-site events, and Facilitated discussions followed by Officer.
participating in workgroup sessions. additional facilitated subcommittee [FR Doc. 2017–24878 Filed 11–15–17; 8:45 am]
Tours of VA facilities are closed, to discussions. The day will conclude with BILLING CODE P
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:52 Nov 15, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00117 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM 16NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_53783/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2017-11-16 03:53:43
Document Modified: 2017-11-16 03:53:43
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice and request for comments. | |
| Dates | Comments on this notice must be received by December 18, 2017. Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding this proposal. | |
| Contact | Daeleen Chesley, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings (C-70), Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590, 202-366-9342 (voice) 202- 366-7152 (fax) or [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 53563 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR