82_FR_55546 82 FR 55323 - Procedural Regulations for the Copyright Royalty Board Regarding Electronic Filing of Claims; Corrections

82 FR 55323 - Procedural Regulations for the Copyright Royalty Board Regarding Electronic Filing of Claims; Corrections

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Royalty Board

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 223 (November 21, 2017)

Page Range55323-55323
FR Document2017-25183

On June 13, 2017, the Copyright Royalty Judges revised their rules regarding filing of claims. That document inadvertently added a requirement that filers of joint DART claims include addresses and email addresses for all claimants. Interested parties filed a petition to amend asking the Judges to remove the requirement because the proposed rule did not include it. This document corrects the final regulations to remove the requirement.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 223 (Tuesday, November 21, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 21, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 55323]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-25183]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

Copyright Royalty Board

37 CFR Part 360

[Docket No. 17-CRB-0012-RM]


Procedural Regulations for the Copyright Royalty Board Regarding 
Electronic Filing of Claims; Corrections

AGENCY: Copyright Royalty Board (CRB), Library of Congress.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 13, 2017, the Copyright Royalty Judges revised their 
rules regarding filing of claims. That document inadvertently added a 
requirement that filers of joint DART claims include addresses and 
email addresses for all claimants. Interested parties filed a petition 
to amend asking the Judges to remove the requirement because the 
proposed rule did not include it. This document corrects the final 
regulations to remove the requirement.

DATES: Effective November 21, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anita Blaine, CRB Program Specialist, 
by telephone at (202) 707-7658 or email at [email protected]. Docket: For 
access to the docket to read background documents, go to eCRB, the 
Copyright Royalty Board's electronic filing and case management system, 
at https://app.crb.gov/ and search for docket number 17-CRB-0012-RM.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 22, 2017, ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, AARC, 
and HFA petitioned the Copyright Royalty Judges to amend the rule 
regarding filing of DART joint claims, 82 FR 27016, because the 
proposed rule did not discuss a change requiring addresses and email 
addresses of all claimants listed in joint claims, and the new 
requirement places a burden upon the petitioning parties that was 
likely unintended.
    The preamble to the proposed rule, 82 FR 14167, addressed the 
purpose of the revisions to the rules: (1) Changes were necessary due 
to implementation of an electronic filing system, and (2) consolidation 
of rules was necessary to streamline the regulations regarding cable 
and satellite claims. The preamble also stated that the rules regarding 
DART claims would be relocated, but it did not mention any other 
changes to the DART rules. In the final rule, the Judges mistakenly 
added a requirement that filers include in the content of joint DART 
claims the addresses and email addresses of all listed claimants.
    The petitioners argue that if the rule stands they will not be able 
to file joint claims for their clients because of confidentiality 
restrictions regarding release of address information. Had the Judges 
proposed a change in the rule to require addresses and email addresses, 
the petitioners would have submitted a comment objecting to that 
requirement.
    In light of the fact that the claims filing period for DART starts 
in less than two months, the Judges do not intend to impose a greater 
burden on the petitioners than in past filing periods. They remove the 
requirement for claimant addresses and email addresses from the 
regulations governing the content of joint DART claims.

List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 360

    Administrative practice and procedure, Cable royalties, Claims, 
Copyright, Electronic filing, Satellite royalties.

    Accordingly, 37 CFR part 360 is corrected by making the following 
correcting amendments:

PART 360--FILING OF CLAIMS TO ROYALTY FEES COLLECTED UNDER 
COMPULSORY LICENSE

0
1. The authority citation for part 360 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 17 U.S.C. 801, 803, 805.
    Subpart A also issued under 17 U.S.C. 111(d)(4) and 119(b)(4).
    Subpart B also issued under 17 U.S.C. 1007(a)(1).
    Subpart C also issued under 17 U.S.C. 111(d)(4), 119(b)(4) and 
1007(a)(1).


0
2. In Sec.  360.22, revise paragraph (e) to read as follows:


Sec.  360.22  Form and content of claims.

* * * * *
    (e) List of claimants. If the claim is a joint claim, it must 
include the name of each claimant participating in the joint claim. 
Filers submitting joint claims online through eCRB on behalf of ten or 
fewer claimants, must list the name of each claimant included in the 
joint claim directly on the filed joint claim. Filers submitting joint 
claims on behalf of more than ten claimants must include an Excel 
spreadsheet listing the name of each claimant included in the joint 
claim. For joint claims filed by mail or hand delivery, the filer may 
submit the list containing the name of each claimant included in the 
joint claim in a single Excel spreadsheet on CD, DVD, or other 
electronic storage medium.
* * * * *

    Dated: November 16, 2017.
Suzanne M. Barnett,
Chief Copyright Royalty Judge.
[FR Doc. 2017-25183 Filed 11-20-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-72-P



                                                                   Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 21, 2017 / Rules and Regulations                                            55323

                                                  impact caused by the temporary                          the petitioning parties that was likely               fewer claimants, must list the name of
                                                  deviation.                                              unintended.                                           each claimant included in the joint
                                                     In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),                    The preamble to the proposed rule, 82              claim directly on the filed joint claim.
                                                  the drawbridge must return to its regular               FR 14167, addressed the purpose of the                Filers submitting joint claims on behalf
                                                  operating schedule immediately at the                   revisions to the rules: (1) Changes were              of more than ten claimants must include
                                                  end of the effective period of this                     necessary due to implementation of an                 an Excel spreadsheet listing the name of
                                                  temporary deviation. This deviation                     electronic filing system, and (2)                     each claimant included in the joint
                                                  from the operating regulations is                       consolidation of rules was necessary to               claim. For joint claims filed by mail or
                                                  authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.                         streamline the regulations regarding                  hand delivery, the filer may submit the
                                                    Dated: November 16, 2017.                             cable and satellite claims. The preamble              list containing the name of each
                                                                                                          also stated that the rules regarding                  claimant included in the joint claim in
                                                  Christopher J. Bisignano,
                                                                                                          DART claims would be relocated, but it                a single Excel spreadsheet on CD, DVD,
                                                  Supervisory Bridge Management Specialist,
                                                                                                          did not mention any other changes to                  or other electronic storage medium.
                                                  First Coast Guard District.
                                                                                                          the DART rules. In the final rule, the                *      *    *     *    *
                                                  [FR Doc. 2017–25157 Filed 11–20–17; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                          Judges mistakenly added a requirement
                                                  BILLING CODE 9110–04–P                                                                                          Dated: November 16, 2017.
                                                                                                          that filers include in the content of joint
                                                                                                                                                                Suzanne M. Barnett,
                                                                                                          DART claims the addresses and email
                                                                                                          addresses of all listed claimants.                    Chief Copyright Royalty Judge.
                                                  LIBRARY OF CONGRESS                                        The petitioners argue that if the rule             [FR Doc. 2017–25183 Filed 11–20–17; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                          stands they will not be able to file joint            BILLING CODE 1410–72–P
                                                  Copyright Royalty Board                                 claims for their clients because of
                                                                                                          confidentiality restrictions regarding
                                                  37 CFR Part 360                                         release of address information. Had the               FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
                                                  [Docket No. 17–CRB–0012–RM]                             Judges proposed a change in the rule to               COMMISSION
                                                                                                          require addresses and email addresses,
                                                  Procedural Regulations for the                          the petitioners would have submitted a                47 CFR Parts 0, 1, 43, and 63
                                                  Copyright Royalty Board Regarding                       comment objecting to that requirement.                [IB Docket No. 17–55; 16–131, FCC 17–136]
                                                  Electronic Filing of Claims;                               In light of the fact that the claims
                                                  Corrections                                             filing period for DART starts in less than            Reporting Requirements for U.S.
                                                                                                          two months, the Judges do not intend to               Providers of International Services;
                                                  AGENCY:  Copyright Royalty Board (CRB),                 impose a greater burden on the                        2016 Biennial Review of
                                                  Library of Congress.                                    petitioners than in past filing periods.              Telecommunications Regulations
                                                  ACTION: Correcting amendment.                           They remove the requirement for
                                                                                                          claimant addresses and email addresses                AGENCY:  Federal Communications
                                                  SUMMARY:    On June 13, 2017, the                       from the regulations governing the                    Commission.
                                                  Copyright Royalty Judges revised their                  content of joint DART claims.                         ACTION: Final rule.
                                                  rules regarding filing of claims. That
                                                  document inadvertently added a                          List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 360                   SUMMARY:    In this document, the Federal
                                                  requirement that filers of joint DART                                                                         Communications Commission
                                                                                                            Administrative practice and
                                                  claims include addresses and email                                                                            (Commission) eliminates the annual
                                                                                                          procedure, Cable royalties, Claims,
                                                  addresses for all claimants. Interested                                                                       international Traffic and Revenue
                                                                                                          Copyright, Electronic filing, Satellite
                                                  parties filed a petition to amend asking                                                                      Reports. The submission of the Traffic
                                                                                                          royalties.
                                                  the Judges to remove the requirement                                                                          and Revenue Reports is no longer
                                                                                                            Accordingly, 37 CFR part 360 is                     necessary as the costs of the data
                                                  because the proposed rule did not                       corrected by making the following
                                                  include it. This document corrects the                                                                        collection now exceed its benefits.
                                                                                                          correcting amendments:                                Instead, the Commission will rely on
                                                  final regulations to remove the
                                                  requirement.                                            PART 360—FILING OF CLAIMS TO                          commercially available data, along with
                                                                                                          ROYALTY FEES COLLECTED UNDER                          targeted data collections when
                                                  DATES: Effective November 21, 2017.                                                                           necessary, to meet its statutory
                                                                                                          COMPULSORY LICENSE
                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                                                                              objectives. The Report and Order also
                                                  Anita Blaine, CRB Program Specialist,                   ■ 1. The authority citation for part 360              reduces the burdens of the Circuit
                                                  by telephone at (202) 707–7658 or email                 continues to read as follows:                         Capacity Reports, for instance by
                                                  at crb@loc.gov. Docket: For access to the                                                                     eliminating reporting of terrestrial and
                                                                                                            Authority: 17 U.S.C. 801, 803, 805.
                                                  docket to read background documents,                      Subpart A also issued under 17 U.S.C.               satellite circuits.
                                                  go to eCRB, the Copyright Royalty                       111(d)(4) and 119(b)(4).                              DATES: Effective December 21, 2017,
                                                  Board’s electronic filing and case                        Subpart B also issued under 17 U.S.C.               except for 47 CFR 0.457(d)(1)(xi),
                                                  management system, at https://                          1007(a)(1).                                           1.767(g)(13) through (16), 43.62, 43.82,
                                                  app.crb.gov/ and search for docket                        Subpart C also issued under 17 U.S.C.               63.10(c)(2), 63.21(d), 63.22(e), (h) and
                                                  number 17–CRB–0012–RM.                                  111(d)(4), 119(b)(4) and 1007(a)(1).                  (i). The amendments to 47 CFR 43.62,
                                                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August                    ■ 2. In § 360.22, revise paragraph (e) to             43.82, and 63.22(h) require approval of
                                                  22, 2017, ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, AARC,                      read as follows:                                      information collection requirements by
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with RULES




                                                  and HFA petitioned the Copyright                                                                              the Office of Management and Budget
                                                  Royalty Judges to amend the rule                        § 360.22    Form and content of claims.               (OMB) prior to becoming effective; and
                                                  regarding filing of DART joint claims, 82               *     *     *     *    *                              the effective date for amendments to 47
                                                  FR 27016, because the proposed rule                       (e) List of claimants. If the claim is a            CFR 0.457(d)(1)(xi), 1.767(g)(13) through
                                                  did not discuss a change requiring                      joint claim, it must include the name of              (16), 63.10(c)(2), 63.21(d), 63.22(e) and
                                                  addresses and email addresses of all                    each claimant participating in the joint              (i) will be the same as those for 47 CFR
                                                  claimants listed in joint claims, and the               claim. Filers submitting joint claims                 43.62, 43.82, and 63.22(h) because those
                                                  new requirement places a burden upon                    online through eCRB on behalf of ten or               amendments are directly related to each


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:18 Nov 20, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00019   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM   21NOR1



Document Created: 2017-11-21 00:43:08
Document Modified: 2017-11-21 00:43:08
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionCorrecting amendment.
DatesEffective November 21, 2017.
ContactAnita Blaine, CRB Program Specialist, by telephone at (202) 707-7658 or email at [email protected] Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents, go to eCRB, the Copyright Royalty Board's electronic filing and case management system, at https://app.crb.gov/ and search for docket number 17-CRB-0012-RM.
FR Citation82 FR 55323 
CFR AssociatedAdministrative Practice and Procedure; Cable Royalties; Claims; Copyright; Electronic Filing and Satellite Royalties

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR