82 FR 55443 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Describe Functionality of and Adopt Fees for a New Front-End Order Entry and Management Platform
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 223 (November 21, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 223 (November 21, 2017)
| Page Range | 55443-55449 | |
| FR Document | 2017-25144 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 21, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 55443-55449] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-25144] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-82088; File No. SR-CBOE-2017-068] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Describe Functionality of and Adopt Fees for a New Front-End Order Entry and Management Platform November 15, 2017. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that on November 2, 2017, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to describe the functionality of and adopt fees for the use of the Silexx trading platform (``Silexx'' or the ``platform'') in connection with the purchase of assets from Silexx Financial Systems, LLC (SFS). The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of this filing is to describe the functionality and adopt fees for the use of Silexx, a new front-end order entry and management platform. On the date of this filing, Cboe Silexx, LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary of Cboe Options' parent company, Cboe Global Markets, Inc.) (``Cboe Silexx'') entered into a definitive asset purchase agreement with SFS pursuant to which Cboe Silexx agreed to purchase Silexx, a front-end, broker-neutral, multi-asset class order entry and management trading platform. Silexx is an order entry and management trading platform for listed stocks and options that support both simple and complex orders.\5\ The platform is a software application that is installed locally on a user's desktop. The platform provides users with the capability to send option orders to U.S. [[Page 55444]] options exchanges and stock orders to U.S. stock exchanges (and other trading centers \6\), and allows users to input parameters to control the size, timing and other variables of their trades.\7\ Silexx includes access to real-time options and stock market data, as well as access to certain historical data. The platform provides users with the ability to maintain an electronic audit trail and provide detailed trade reporting.\8\ Use of Silexx is completely optional. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ The platform also permits users to submit orders for commodity futures, commodity options and other non-security products to be sent to designated contract markets, futures commission merchants, introducing brokers or other applicable destinations of the users' choice. \6\ A ``trading center,'' as provided under Rule 600(b)(78) of Regulation NMS, 17 CFR 242.600(b)(78), means a national securities exchange or national securities association that operates a self- regulatory organization trading facility, an alternative trading system, an exchange market-maker, an over-the-counter market-maker, or any other broker or dealer that executes orders internally by trading as principal or crossing orders as agent. \7\ The platform also provides position and risk management capabilities. The risk management functionality allows users to, among other things, set pre-trade customizable risk controls. Users of these risk controls set the parameters for the controls (to the extent an executing broker sublicenses the platform to its customers (see below), the executing broker may set risk controls on behalf of its customers). Users have the option to instead use other third- party risk control software or technology. The Exchange notes that executing broker-dealers (including Trading Permit Holders) must ensure that any orders that come from the platform to their systems will be subject to all applicable pre-trade risk control requirements in accordance with Rule 15c3-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''). See 17 CFR 240.15c3-5. Please note that, in the adopting release for Rule 15c3-5 under the Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') indicated that a broker-dealer relying on risk management technology developed by third parties should perform appropriate due diligence to help assure the controls are reasonably designed, effective, and otherwise consistent with Rule 15c3-5. Mere reliance on representations of the third-party technology developer, even if an exchange or other regulated entity, is insufficient to meet this due diligence standard. \8\ The functionality of the platform that formats users' stock and option orders entered into it for users, which then submit those orders to broker-dealers or to exchanges (if the user is a broker- dealer) for execution, is the basis for this rule filing. Certain versions of the platform (as further described below) include other functionality, including additional risk controls and certain data analysis tools for real-time and historical data, including market scanners, watchlists and alerts and other advanced analytical tools, including time and sales analytics, charting capabilities, alerts, position analytics, and ``Greek'' calculations. These data analysis tools are not subject to this rule filing. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Silexx is designed so that a user may enter orders into the platform to send to the executing broker (including Trading Permit Holders) of its choice with connectivity to the platform, which broker can then send orders to Cboe Options (if the broker-dealer is a Trading Permit Holder) or other U.S. exchanges (and trading centers) in accordance with the users' instructions.\9\ If a user sends an order through the platform to an executing broker, the broker will route that order to a market for execution on behalf of the entering user.\10\ The executing broker to which a user chooses to route an order is entirely within a user's discretion.\11\ Users cannot directly route orders through the platform to an exchange or trading center. For users' convenience, Cboe Silexx will make available on Cboe Options' Web site the list of executing brokers that provide connectivity to the platform. The Exchange notes that executing broker's decision to connect to Silexx is within that firm's sole discretion.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ Currently, Silexx is not connected directly to Cboe Options, and thus orders may not be sent directly from the platform to Cboe Options. The Exchange may determine going forward to develop such a direct connection, which would only be available to platform users that are Trading Permit Holders, and would submit any necessary rule changes related to such platform changes. \10\ A user may also be an executing broker if the user has connectivity to, and is a member of, Cboe Options or other options and/or stock exchanges (or trading centers). \11\ Currently, there are over 20 executing brokers with connections to Silexx to which users may route orders. \12\ To the extent a firm sublicenses Silexx to its customers (see below), the firm will determine which executing broker to use for platforms used by the firm and its customers (if the firm is not itself an executing broker). Users enter into separate agreements with execution brokers (to which Cboe Options or Cboe Silexx would not be a party). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Certain executing brokers may permit Silexx users to designate a market to which the broker is to route an order received from the platform. Other executing brokers may employ ``smart router'' functionality, which generally determines where to route an order based on the brokers' pre-set algorithmic logic. Executing brokers may also provide users with the ability to either designate a destination market (an order-by-order basis or by default) or use the smart router functionality. Which executing broker a user chooses to use (and thus which type of routing permissions are available to a user) is entirely within a user's discretion (as discussed below, addition of such features to the platform are subject to a fee). The Exchange represents Silexx is merely a new front-end order entry and management system that interfaces to the systems of various broker-dealers that elect to connect to the platform. The platform is not integrated into and currently has no connectivity to Cboe Options' trading system (or the trading systems of any other U.S. exchange or trading center). Cboe Options currently offers a similar front-end order entry system, the PULSe workstation, which permits users to enter orders for submission to Cboe Options and other markets. Thus, orders submitted through the platform will ultimately come to Cboe Options or other exchanges for execution through third-party routing technology. There will be no change to, or impact on, the Exchange's market structure as a result of offering the platform. As a result, the Exchange represents the platform does not require any changes to the Exchange's surveillance or communications rules. Use of Silexx is completely voluntary. Cboe Silexx will make the platform available to users (and in certain cases, their customers, as further described below) as a convenience for entering and managing orders, but the platform is not an exclusive means for any user to send orders to Cboe Options or intermarket. Orders entered into the platform that are ultimately routed to Cboe Options for execution will receive no preferential treatment as compared to orders electronically sent to Cboe Options in any other manner. Orders entered into the platform that get routed to Cboe Options will be subject to current trading rules in the same manner as all other orders sent to the Exchange, which is the same as orders that are sent through the system to the Exchange today. The Cboe Options trade engine does not distinguish between orders sent from Silexx and orders sent in any other manner. Cboe Silexx will begin making the system available to users upon the closing of the acquisition of Silexx.\13\ Cboe Silexx will grant users licenses to use Silexx. The Exchange notes that a firm or individual does not need to be a Trading Permit Holder to license the platform, because, as discussed above, a non-Trading Permit Holder may route an order through the platform to an executing broker that is a Trading Permit Holder, which broker can then route the order to Cboe Options (or any other U.S. exchange of which it is a member). Additionally, the platform is not currently directly connected to Cboe Options (or any other U.S. exchange), and orders submitted into the platform for execution must be routed through the connectivity of an executing broker.\14\ Cboe Silexx will also provide technical support, maintenance and user training for the platform upon the same terms and conditions for all users. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ Cboe Silexx intends to close the acquisition on the signing date (and date of this rule filing). The proposed rule change will be operative on the closing date (subject to Commission approval of the requested operative delay waiver). \14\ Rule 6.23A provides that only Trading Permit Holders and associated persons with authorized access may directly enter orders into Cboe Options' trading system. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 55445]] The following table sets for the pricing for the various versions of the Silexx platform: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform version Platform description Fee per month per login ID ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Silexx Basic.......................... Order-entry and management system that $200. provides basic functionality including real-time data, alerts, trade reports, views of exchange books, management of the customer's orders and positions, simple and complex order tickets, and basic risk features. Silexx Pro............................ Same functionality as basic platform 400. plus additional features including an algorithmic order ticket, position analysis, charting, earnings and dividend information, delta hedging tools, volatility skews, and additional risk features. Silexx Sell-Side...................... Same functionality as Pro platform plus 475. availability of clearing fields in order tickets. Silexx Pro Plus Risk.................. Same functionality as Pro platform plus 600. access to unlimited customer accounts and customizable risk views. Silexx Buy-Side Plus Risk............. Same functionality as Pro platform plus 300.\15\ functionality package generally used by buy-side investors and customizable risk views. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Additional functionality for platforms Functionality description Fee ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- API................................... Integrates the platform into users' $200/month/ login ID. other applications through the Silexx application programming interface (``API''). Crossing.............................. Availability of crossing order ticket... 300/month/login ID. Port.................................. Provides access to an executing broker 100/month/login ID. with connectivity to the Silexx platform for routing. Staged Orders, Drop Copies, and Order Ability to receive staged orders, 250/month/FIX Connection. Routing Functionality for FIX receive ``drop copies'' of order fill Connections (sessions). messages, and route orders to executing brokers. Staged Orders, Drop Copies, and Order Ability to receive staged orders, 500/month/FIX Connection. Routing Functionality for FIX receive ``drop copies'' of order fill Connections (sessions) Using Third- messages, and route orders to executing Party FIX Router. brokers through a third-party FIX router. Equity Order Reports (paid by the Daily transmission of equity order 250/month/trading firm. trading firm). reports. Domestic Index Data Package........... Connection to certain domestic index 25/user/month. market data feeds. Market Data Feeds (excluding feeds Connections to other market data feeds.. Actual costs (determined on a included in Domestic Index Data time (per hour) and materials Package). basis) passed through to user.\16\ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The monthly platform fees for the Silexx platform will allow for Cboe Silexx's recoupment of the costs of maintaining, supporting and enhancing the platform, as well as for income from the value-added services being provided through use of the various versions of the platform. The Exchange believes the fee structure represents an equitable allocation of reasonable fees because the same monthly log-in ID fees apply to all users of each version of the Silexx platform. The Exchange believes these fees are reasonable and appropriate as they are competitive with similar products available throughout the market and are based on Silexx's costs and fee structure currently in place for the platform. Users can choose to route orders, including to Cboe Options, without the use of the platform. Use of the platform is discretionary and not compulsory. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ Proprietary buy-side firms with 25 or more login IDs receive a 15% discount on platform-related fees, excluding firms with dedicated instances of the platform, which discount incentives more buy-side investors to use Silexx. \16\ The same reasonable hourly and materials rates will apply to all users based on then-current rates in line with industry standards, which costs (and any reasonable, standard mark-up) will be passed through to users. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The additional functionality will permit users to add features in accordance with their use of the Silexx platform. The API functionality integrates the platform into users' other applications through the Silexx API. The crossing functionality provides users who choose to regularly cross orders with access to a crossing order ticket. The port fee applies to connections from users to executing brokers, which provides users with access to an executing broker with connectivity to the Silexx platform for routing. Financial Information eXchange (``FIX'') is an industry-standard, non-proprietary API that permits market participants to connect to exchanges. FIX connectivity provides users with the ability to receive ``drop copy'' order fill messages from their executing brokers. These fill messages allows customers to update positions, risk calculations, and streamline back-office functions. Additionally, FIX connections can be updated to permit the platform to receive orders sent from another system and then route these orders through the platform for execution (staged orders) as well as provide users with the ability to route orders in various ways to executing brokers (such as designation of a market to which the broker is to route an order received from the platform and use of a broker's ``smart router'' functionality). Some users have connections to third- party FIX routers, who currently normalize the format of messages of their client. To the extent a FIX router has a connection to the Silexx platform, users that also have connections to these routers may elect to receive staged [[Page 55446]] orders, drop copies, and order routing functionality through a fix router. Connectivity of Silexx into the technology of third-party FIX routers causes the monthly fee for this functionality to be higher than the fee for users who receive this feature directly. Additionally, the Silexx platform permits users to elect to receive daily transmission of equity order reports related to order users submit through the platform. The proposed monthly fee will allow for the recoupment of costs of developing, maintaining, and supporting this reporting functionality. The Exchange is offering each type of additional functionality as a convenience. The fees for this additional functionality allow for Cboe Silexx's recoupment of the costs of maintaining, supporting and enhancing the functionality, as well as for income from the value-added services being provided through use of the functionality in connection with the platform. The Exchange believes the fee structure represents an equitable allocation of reasonable fees because the same fees apply to all users of each type of additional functionality. The Exchange believes these fees are reasonable and appropriate as they are competitive with similar products available throughout the market and are based on Silexx's costs and fee structure currently in place for these features. Use of each additional functionality is discretionary and not compulsory. Except as otherwise set forth above, fees related to the Silexx platform will be paid by the user that licenses the platform directly from Cboe Silexx. The proposed fees would become effective on the closing date of the acquisition.\17\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ The Exchange generally invoices firms for fees in arrears on a monthly basis and intends to do so following the closing of the acquisition with respect to all fees related to the Silexx platform, as proposed in this filing. The Exchange understands certain Silexx customers pay fees upfront at the beginning of the month. Therefore, to avoid any double-charging of customers, Cboe Silexx will not invoice any user for the proposed fees for the month in which the closing date falls to the extent the user paid fees for such month to Silexx at the beginning of such calendar month. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange proposes the following additional fees related to dedicated instances of the Silexx platform. These fees are all paid by the client firm with the dedicated instance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dedicated instance functionality Functionality description Fee ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dedicated Instance...................... Deployment of Silexx infrastructure $20,000/month. components at a client hosted site. Market Center Support................... Access to and support for domestic and 1,000/market center/month. international market centers and asset classes. Dedicated Feed Handler.................. Market data feed handler for third-party 2,000/handler/month. market data vendors. Bloomberg Backoffice Integration........ Integrates Bloomberg backoffice files into 1,000/month. master security database within Silexx. Pro Plus API............................ Dedicated instances of API functionality.. 250/user/month. CME STP................................. Connection to CME's straight through 1,500/month. processing facility. FIX International Connection (Session).. FIX connection for multiple asset classes 1,500/month. and multiple market centers. Additional Site......................... Deployment of dedicated instance at a 6,500/month. secondary site. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A dedicated instance is local installation of the Silexx platform within a client's system and hosted infrastructure, essentially permitting a more customized experience for firms and their customers. A dedicated instance permits the firm to determine which market centers it wants its instance to access (and receive support for that access), handle data from widely used third-party market-data vendors (e.g. Bloomberg), integrate commonly used Bloomberg back office files into a master security database, provide API functionality for users, connect to the Chicago Mercantile Exchange's straight-through processing facility, provide FIX connectivity for multiple asset classes and multiple market centers around the world, and add the platform functionality to a second hosted site. Additionally, the dedicated instance permits firms to elect to receive various market data feeds from throughout the industry. The dedicated instance fees for the Silexx platform will allow for Cboe Silexx's recoupment of the costs of installing, maintaining, supporting and enhancing dedicated instances of the platform, as well as for income from the value-added services being provided through use of a dedicated instance and each type of added functionality. The Exchange believes the fee structure represents an equitable allocation of reasonable fees because the same fees apply to all client firms with dedicated instances. The Exchange believes these fees are reasonable and appropriate as they are competitive with similar products available throughout the market and are based on Silexx's costs and fee structure currently in place for the platform. Use of a dedicated instance is discretionary and not compulsory. The Exchange notes that Cboe Silexx may provide additional technology products and services and may in the future engage in other business activities, which may include the provision of other technology products and services to broker-dealers and non-broker- dealers in addition to the Silexx platform.\18\ In this regard: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ Cboe Silexx is not and, at least initially, will not be registered as a broker-dealer under Section 15(a) of the Act. In this regard, the Exchange notes the following: (a) Cboe Options and Cboe Silexx will be responsible for the marketing of the platform. Cboe Silexx will be the party to any agreements with customers for the platform. (b) Cboe Options and Cboe Silexx will be responsible for providing, supporting and maintaining the technology for the platform. Cboe Options will be responsible for ensuring that Cboe Silexx's provision of the platform, to the extent it is deemed a facility of Cboe Options, meets Cboe Options' self-regulatory organization obligations. (c) Unless it registers as a broker-dealer under Section 15(a) of the Act, Cboe Silexx will not hold itself out as a broker-dealer, provide advice related to securities transactions, match orders, make decisions about routing orders, facilitate the clearance and settlement of executed trades, prepare or send transaction confirmations, screen counterparties for creditworthiness, hold funds or securities, open, maintain, administer or close brokerage accounts, or provide assistance in resolving problems, discrepancies or disputes related to brokerage accounts. Should Cboe Silexx seek to register as a broker-dealer in the future, the Exchange represents that the broker-dealer would not perform any operations without first discussing with the Commission staff whether any of the broker-dealer's operations should be subject to an Exchange rule filing required under the Act. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------There will be procedures and internal controls in place that are reasonably designed so that Cboe Silexx will not unfairly take advantage of confidential information it receives as a result of its relationship with Cboe Options in connection with the platform or any other business activities. The books, records, premises, officers, directors, agents and employees of Cboe Silexx, with respect to the products that may be deemed facilities of Cboe Options, will be deemed to be those of [[Page 55447]] Cboe Options for purposes of and subject to oversight pursuant to the Act. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\19\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \20\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \21\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. Additionally, the Exchange also believes the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\22\ which requires that Exchange rules provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its Trading Permit Holders and other persons using its facilities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). \21\ Id. \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In particular, the Exchange believes that offering the platform and all other functionality to market participants protects investors and is in the public interest, because it will allow the Exchange to directly offer users an order entry and management system in addition to the technology products it currently offers (such as the PULSe workstation). The Silexx platform is currently offered and used in the marketplace and competes with similar products offered by other technology providers as well as other exchanges.\23\ Additionally, firms can create their own proprietary front-end order entry software and routing technology. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \23\ For example, International Securities Exchange, LLC (``ISE'') offers a front-end order entry workstation called PrecISE to its customers, which the Exchange believes has similar functionality as the system. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange believes the proposed rule change does not discriminate among market participants because use of the platform and all other functionality is completely voluntary. Users can choose to route orders, including to Cboe Options, without the use of the platform. The Exchange is making the platform and all other functionality available as a convenience to market participants, who will continue to have the option to use any order entry and management system available in the marketplace to send orders to the Exchange and other exchanges; the platform is merely an alternative that will be offered by the Exchange rather than its current owner. The Silexx platform is not an exclusive means available to market participants to send orders to Cboe Options or other markets. Any orders sent through the platform to Cboe Options for execution will receive no preferential treatment. Additionally, the platform will be available to all market participants, and the Exchange will license the platform to market participants pursuant to the same terms and conditions. The Exchange believes the platform and additional functionality removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system because users have discretion to determine to which broker-dealer they will route orders from the platform, and, for certain versions of the platform, what type of routing parameters will be available to them (whether it is the ability to designate a destination market or use smart router functionality). Non-broker-dealer users may separately enter into an agreement with a broker-dealer (the Exchange will have no involvement with the entry into such agreements), which can provide for routing to U.S. options and stock exchanges (and trading centers). Only Trading Permit Holders will continue to be permitted to directly route orders received from the platform to Cboe Options, and only members of other U.S. exchanges will be able to enter orders for execution at those exchanges that they receive from the platform. The Exchange also notes that broker-dealers must continue to ensure that orders they receive from the platform will be subject to applicable pre-trade risk control requirements of the broker-dealer that directly submits the orders to an exchange in accordance with Rule 15c3-5 under the Act.\24\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \24\ See 17 CFR 240.15c3-5. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The monthly log-in ID fees, API fee, crossing fee, and port fee for the Silexx platform will allow for Cboe Silexx's recoupment of the costs of developing, maintaining, supporting and enhancing the platform, the API and crossing functionality, and connections from users to executing brokers, as well as for income from the value-added services being provided through use of the various versions of the platform and these additional services. The Exchange believes the fee structure represents an equitable allocation of reasonable fees because the same monthly log-in ID fees apply to all users of each version of the Silexx platform, and because varying fees for different versions of the platform reflect the additional functionality available in the versions. The Exchange believes these fees are reasonable and appropriate as they are competitive with similar products available throughout the market and are substantially similar to Silexx's costs and fee structure currently in place for the platform. Use of the platform, and other functionality, is discretionary and not compulsory. The monthly fees related to FIX connectivity services will allow for the recoupment of costs of maintaining and supporting this functionality as well as for income from the value-added services being provided from use of this functionality. The Exchange believes the fee is reasonable because the Exchange incurs costs to monitor, develop, and implement upgrades, maintain, and customize the platform to ensure availability of this functionality to customers. The Exchange believes the fee is equitable and non-discriminatory because the monthly fee is assessed to any user electing to use this functionality. Connectivity of Silexx into the technology of third-party FIX routers causes the monthly fee for this functionality to be higher than the fee for users who receive this feature directly. Use of the FIX connectivity services by a user is voluntary. The proposed monthly fee related to equity order reports will allow for the recoupment of costs of developing, maintaining, and supporting this reporting functionality. The Exchange believes the monthly fee for transmission of equity order reports is reasonable because the Exchange incurs costs to monitor, develop, and implement upgrades, maintain, and customize the platform to allow sending and receiving of equity order reports. The Exchange believes the fee is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory as it is assessed to all executing brokers electing to receive equity order reports. Receipt of the reports is completely voluntary. A dedicated instance is local installation of the Silexx pro platform within a client's system and hosted Web site benefits investors, as it permits a more customized experience for firms and their customers. The Exchange [[Page 55448]] believes the fees are reasonable because the Exchange incurs costs to customize dedicated instances of the platform. The dedicated instance fees for the Silexx platform will allow for Cboe Silexx's recoupment of the costs of installing, maintaining, supporting and enhancing dedicated instances of the platform, as well as for income from the value-added services being provided through use of a dedicated instance and each type of added functionality. The Exchange believes the fee structure represents an equitable allocation of reasonable fees because the same fees apply to all client firms with dedicated instances. The Exchange believes these fees are reasonable and appropriate as they are competitive with similar products available throughout the market and are based on Silexx's costs and fee structure currently in place for the platform. Use of a dedicated instance is discretionary and not compulsory. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition Cboe Options does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange will make each version of the platform and additional functionality available to market participants on the same terms and conditions, and use of the platform will be completely voluntary. Users have discretion to determine which version of the platform to use, if any, and to which executing broker-dealer to route orders through the platform. Market participants will continue to have the flexibility to use any order entry and management technology they choose. The Exchange will merely be directly offering the platform as an alternative to a product that the Exchange currently makes available in the market (PULSe). If market participants believe that other products available in the marketplace are more beneficial than the Silexx platform, they will simply use those products instead. Orders sent to the Exchange through the platform for execution will receive no preferential treatment. The Cboe Options trade engine does not distinguish between orders sent from Silexx and orders sent in any other manner. Use of the platform provides users with no additional access to the Exchange than is available through the use of any other front-end order entry system. The Exchange notes that the platform and additional functionality are already available and used in the marketplace today. This acquisition merely changes the party that will own and license them to users going forward. The proposed fees related to additional functionality will not impose any burden on competition, because the fees relate to optional functionality and are assessed equally on users or firms electing to use the functionality. Use of such functionality is completely voluntary. Access to Silexx functionality, and the proposed Silexx fees, are unrelated to trading activity on the Exchange. The proposed fees related to dedicated instances of the platform will not impose any burden on competition, because the fees relate to optional functionality and are assessed equally on firms electing to obtain a dedicated instance. Use of a dedicated instance is completely voluntary. Cboe Options believes that the proposed rule change will relieve any burden on, or otherwise promote, competition. Cboe Options will be offering a type of product that is widely available throughout the industry, including from some exchanges. Market participants can also develop their own proprietary products with the same functionality. ISE currently offers a similar front-end order entry application. Cboe Options believes that the platform will be an addition to its current suite of technology products it offers to market participants to enter and manage orders for routing to U.S. exchanges. Any market participant will be able to use the platform. Cboe Silexx's ownership of Silexx will not provide a competitive advantage over competing products as a result of its affiliation with Cboe. The Exchange notes that when Congress charged the Commission with supervising the development of a ``national market system'' for securities, a premise of its action was that prices, products and services ordinarily would be determined by market forces.\25\ Consistent with this purpose, Congress and the Commission have repeatedly stated their preference for competition, rather than regulatory intervention, to determine prices, products and services in the securities markets.\26\ Many exchanges and other market participants make technology products, including products similar to the Silexx platform, available to the industry. Other market participants that offer these products can adjust pricing or add functionality to attract users to their products to compete with the Exchange-offered products based on all competitive forces in the marketplace, as the Exchange expects these other market participants currently do. The Exchange believes that other market participants that offer these products will continue to remain competitive in the market for order-entry, management and routing products, as they currently are in this market in which at least two exchanges (including Cboe Options) offer similar technology products. For example, Cboe Options currently offers PULSe, and ISE currently offers PrecISE. The Exchange believes that many investors will continue to elect to use competing products available from non-exchange technology providers. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \25\ See, e.g., H.R. Rep. No. 94-229, at 92 (1975) (Conf. Rep.) (stating Congress's intent that the ``national market system evolve through the interplay of competitive forces as unnecessary regulatory restrictions are removed''). \26\ See S. Rep. No. 94-75, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 8 (1975) (``The objective [in enacting the 1975 amendments to the Exchange Act] would be to enhance competition and to allow economic forces, interacting within a fair regulatory field, to arrive at appropriate variations in practices and services.''); Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to NYSE Arca Data, Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770 (Dec. 9, 2008) at 74781 (``The Exchange Act and its legislative history strongly support the Commission's reliance on competition, whenever possible, in meeting its regulatory responsibilities for overseeing the SROs and the national market system. Indeed, competition among multiple markets and market participants trading the same products is the hallmark of the national market system.'') (SR-NYSEArca-2006-21); Regulation NMS, 70 FR at 37499 (observing that NMS regulation ``has been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in [the] forms that are most important to investors and listed companies''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \27\ and subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\28\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \27\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). \28\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). As required under Rule 19b- 4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 55449]] A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \29\ permits the Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposed rule change will become operative upon filing. The Exchange states that such waiver will enable continuous access to the platform by users and a seamless transition of ownership of Silexx. The Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest because the proposal does not raise any novel issues and waiver will allow current users of Silexx to continue to use the platform without interruption. Therefore, the Commission hereby waives the operative delay and designates the proposed rule change operative upon filing.\30\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \29\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). \30\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission also has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-CBOE-2017-068 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2017-068. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2017-068, and should be submitted on or before December 12, 2017. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\31\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \31\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017-25144 Filed 11-20-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 21, 2017 / Notices 55443
its commitments to provide liquidity.260 proposal is consistent with Rule 17Ad– I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
As described above in Section II.D., 22(e)(7)(v) under the Exchange Act. Statement of the Terms of Substance of
FICC would require GSD Netting the Proposed Rule Change
Members to attest that they have IV. Conclusion
The Exchange proposes to describe
accounted for their potential Individual Based on the foregoing, the the functionality of and adopt fees for
Total Amount, and FICC has had Commission finds that the proposal is the use of the Silexx trading platform
discussions with Netting Members consistent with the requirements of the (‘‘Silexx’’ or the ‘‘platform’’) in
regarding ways Netting Members, Exchange Act and in particular with the connection with the purchase of assets
regardless of size or access to bank requirements of Section 17A of the from Silexx Financial Systems, LLC
affiliates, can meet this requirement.261 (SFS).
Exchange Act and the rules and
Moreover, FICC proposes to conduct The text of the proposed rule change
regulations thereunder.
due diligence on a quarterly basis to is also available on the Exchange’s Web
assess each Netting Member’s ability to It is therefore ordered, pursuant to site (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/
meet its Individual Total Amount.262 Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,268 CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at
According to FICC, this due diligence that proposed rule change SR–FICC– the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
would include a review of all 2017–002 be, and it hereby is, and at the Commission’s Public
information that the Netting Member APPROVED as of the date of this order. Reference Room.
provided FICC in connection with its For the Commission, by the Division of
ongoing reporting requirements, as well II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
as a review of other publicly available Statement of the Purpose of, and
authority.269
information.263 Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Ronin’s assertion that certain Netting Change
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Members could merely submit an In its filing with the Commission, the
attestation declaring that they ‘‘are good Assistant Secretary.
Exchange included statements
for’’ their CCLF contribution 264 fails to [FR Doc. 2017–25145 Filed 11–20–17; 8:45 am] concerning the purpose of and basis for
account for the fact that, as described BILLING CODE 8011–01–P the proposed rule change and discussed
above, FICC would conduct its own due any comments it received on the
diligence to verify the support for each proposed rule change. The text of these
Netting Member’s attestation. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE statements may be examined at the
Specifically, on a quarterly basis, FICC COMMISSION places specified in Item IV below. The
would review all of the information that Exchange has prepared summaries, set
Netting Members provide in connection [Release No. 34–82088; File No. SR–CBOE– forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
with their ongoing reporting obligations 2017–068] the most significant aspects of such
pursuant to the GSD Rules, and it would statements.
review other publicly available Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
information.265 Therefore, the Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Commission believes that the proposal Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
is consistent with Rule 17Ad– Rule Change To Describe Functionality
Change
22(e)(7)(iv) under the Exchange Act. of and Adopt Fees for a New Front-End
Finally, Rule 17Ad–22(e)(7)(v) under Order Entry and Management Platform 1. Purpose
the Exchange Act requires policies and The purpose of this filing is to
procedures for maintaining and testing November 15, 2017.
describe the functionality and adopt
with each liquidity provider, to the Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the fees for the use of Silexx, a new front-
extent practicable, FICC’s procedures Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the end order entry and management
and operational capacity for accessing ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 platform. On the date of this filing, Cboe
its relevant liquid resources.266 As notice is hereby given that on November Silexx, LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary
described above, under the proposal, 2, 2017, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the of Cboe Options’ parent company, Cboe
FICC would test its operational ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) filed Global Markets, Inc.) (‘‘Cboe Silexx’’)
procedures for invoking a CCLF Event with the Securities and Exchange entered into a definitive asset purchase
and require Netting Members to Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the agreement with SFS pursuant to which
participate in such tests.267 Therefore, proposed rule change as described in Cboe Silexx agreed to purchase Silexx,
the Commission believes that the Items I and II below, which Items have a front-end, broker-neutral, multi-asset
260 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(7)(iv). As discussed in
been prepared by the Exchange. The class order entry and management
the CCA Standards Adopting Release, a key benefit Exchange filed the proposal as a ‘‘non- trading platform.
of the due diligence provisions in Rules 17Ad– controversial’’ proposed rule change Silexx is an order entry and
22(e)(7)(iv) and (v) is an increased level of pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of management trading platform for listed
assurance that liquidity providers would be able to stocks and options that support both
supply liquidity on demand, while their costs
the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
include costs associated with new or updated thereunder.4 The Commission is simple and complex orders.5 The
policies and procedures, and with ongoing publishing this notice to solicit platform is a software application that is
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
monitoring, compliance and testing of liquidity comments on the proposed rule change installed locally on a user’s desktop.
resources. CCA Standards Adopting Release, 81 FR The platform provides users with the
at 70873. from interested persons.
261 See FICC Letter I at 9.
capability to send option orders to U.S.
262 See Notice, 82 FR at 14407–08. 268 15U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 5 The platform also permits users to submit orders
263 Id. 269 17CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
264 Ronin Letter I at 5. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
for commodity futures, commodity options and
other non-security products to be sent to designated
265 See Notice, 82 FR at 14407–08. 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
contract markets, futures commission merchants,
266 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(7)(v). 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
introducing brokers or other applicable destinations
267 Notice, 82 FR at 14407–08. 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). of the users’ choice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:56 Nov 20, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM 21NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_55666/page/1.svg)
![55448 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 21, 2017 / Notices
believes the fees are reasonable because the party that will own and license them exchanges and other market participants
the Exchange incurs costs to customize to users going forward. make technology products, including
dedicated instances of the platform. The The proposed fees related to products similar to the Silexx platform,
dedicated instance fees for the Silexx additional functionality will not impose available to the industry. Other market
platform will allow for Cboe Silexx’s any burden on competition, because the participants that offer these products
recoupment of the costs of installing, fees relate to optional functionality and can adjust pricing or add functionality
maintaining, supporting and enhancing are assessed equally on users or firms to attract users to their products to
dedicated instances of the platform, as electing to use the functionality. Use of compete with the Exchange-offered
well as for income from the value-added such functionality is completely products based on all competitive forces
services being provided through use of voluntary. Access to Silexx in the marketplace, as the Exchange
a dedicated instance and each type of functionality, and the proposed Silexx expects these other market participants
added functionality. The Exchange fees, are unrelated to trading activity on currently do. The Exchange believes
believes the fee structure represents an the Exchange. that other market participants that offer
equitable allocation of reasonable fees The proposed fees related to these products will continue to remain
because the same fees apply to all client dedicated instances of the platform will competitive in the market for order-
firms with dedicated instances. The not impose any burden on competition, entry, management and routing
Exchange believes these fees are because the fees relate to optional products, as they currently are in this
reasonable and appropriate as they are functionality and are assessed equally market in which at least two exchanges
competitive with similar products on firms electing to obtain a dedicated (including Cboe Options) offer similar
available throughout the market and are instance. Use of a dedicated instance is technology products. For example, Cboe
based on Silexx’s costs and fee structure completely voluntary. Options currently offers PULSe, and ISE
currently in place for the platform. Use Cboe Options believes that the currently offers PrecISE. The Exchange
of a dedicated instance is discretionary proposed rule change will relieve any believes that many investors will
and not compulsory. burden on, or otherwise promote, continue to elect to use competing
competition. Cboe Options will be products available from non-exchange
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s offering a type of product that is widely technology providers.
Statement on Burden on Competition available throughout the industry,
including from some exchanges. Market C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Cboe Options does not believe that Statement on Comments on the
the proposed rule change will impose participants can also develop their own
proprietary products with the same Proposed Rule Change Received From
any burden on competition that is not Members, Participants, or Others
necessary or appropriate in furtherance functionality. ISE currently offers a
of the purposes of the Act. The similar front-end order entry The Exchange neither solicited nor
Exchange will make each version of the application. Cboe Options believes that received comments on the proposed
platform and additional functionality the platform will be an addition to its rule change.
available to market participants on the current suite of technology products it
offers to market participants to enter III. Date of Effectiveness of the
same terms and conditions, and use of Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
the platform will be completely and manage orders for routing to U.S.
exchanges. Any market participant will Commission Action
voluntary. Users have discretion to
determine which version of the platform be able to use the platform. Cboe Because the foregoing proposed rule
to use, if any, and to which executing Silexx’s ownership of Silexx will not change does not (i) significantly affect
broker-dealer to route orders through provide a competitive advantage over the protection of investors or the public
the platform. Market participants will competing products as a result of its interest; (ii) impose any significant
continue to have the flexibility to use affiliation with Cboe. burden on competition; and (iii) become
any order entry and management The Exchange notes that when operative for 30 days from the date on
technology they choose. The Exchange Congress charged the Commission with which it was filed, or such shorter time
will merely be directly offering the supervising the development of a as the Commission may designate, it has
platform as an alternative to a product ‘‘national market system’’ for securities, become effective pursuant to Section
that the Exchange currently makes a premise of its action was that prices, 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 27 and
available in the market (PULSe). If products and services ordinarily would subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
market participants believe that other be determined by market forces.25 thereunder.28
products available in the marketplace Consistent with this purpose, Congress
are more beneficial than the Silexx and the Commission have repeatedly 74770 (Dec. 9, 2008) at 74781 (‘‘The Exchange Act
platform, they will simply use those stated their preference for competition, and its legislative history strongly support the
rather than regulatory intervention, to Commission’s reliance on competition, whenever
products instead. Orders sent to the possible, in meeting its regulatory responsibilities
Exchange through the platform for determine prices, products and services for overseeing the SROs and the national market
execution will receive no preferential in the securities markets.26 Many system. Indeed, competition among multiple
markets and market participants trading the same
treatment. The Cboe Options trade 25 See, e.g., H.R. Rep. No. 94–229, at 92 (1975) products is the hallmark of the national market
engine does not distinguish between (Conf. Rep.) (stating Congress’s intent that the system.’’) (SR–NYSEArca–2006–21); Regulation
orders sent from Silexx and orders sent ‘‘national market system evolve through the NMS, 70 FR at 37499 (observing that NMS
regulation ‘‘has been remarkably successful in
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
in any other manner. Use of the interplay of competitive forces as unnecessary
regulatory restrictions are removed’’). promoting market competition in [the] forms that
platform provides users with no 26 See S. Rep. No. 94–75, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 8 are most important to investors and listed
additional access to the Exchange than (1975) (‘‘The objective [in enacting the 1975 companies’’).
is available through the use of any other amendments to the Exchange Act] would be to 27 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
front-end order entry system. The enhance competition and to allow economic forces, 28 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). As required under Rule
Exchange notes that the platform and interacting within a fair regulatory field, to arrive 19b–4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the
at appropriate variations in practices and Commission with written notice of its intent to file
additional functionality are already services.’’); Order Approving Proposed Rule Change the proposed rule change, along with a brief
available and used in the marketplace Relating to NYSE Arca Data, Securities Exchange description and the text of the proposed rule
today. This acquisition merely changes Act Release No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR change, at least five business days prior to the date
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:56 Nov 20, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00105 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM 21NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_55666/page/6.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 21, 2017 / Notices 55449
A proposed rule change filed under Paper Comments SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) normally does not COMMISSION
become operative for 30 days after the • Send paper comments in triplicate
date of its filing. However, Rule 19b– to Secretary, Securities and Exchange [Release No. 34–82080; File No. SR–
Commission, 100 F Street NE., NYSEArca–2017–86]
4(f)(6)(iii) 29 permits the Commission to
designate a shorter time if such action Washington, DC 20549–1090.
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
is consistent with the protection of All submissions should refer to File Arca, Inc.; Order Granting Approval of
investors and the public interest. The Number SR–CBOE–2017–068. This file a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified
Exchange has requested that the number should be included on the by Amendment Nos. 1 and 2, To List
Commission waive the 30-day operative subject line if email is used. To help the and Trade Shares of the JPMorgan
delay so that the proposed rule change Commission process and review your Managed Futures ETF Under NYSE
will become operative upon filing. The comments more efficiently, please use Arca Rule 8.600–E
Exchange states that such waiver will only one method. The Commission will
enable continuous access to the November 15, 2017.
post all comments on the Commission’s
platform by users and a seamless Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ I. Introduction
transition of ownership of Silexx. The rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the On September 14, 2017, NYSE Arca,
Commission believes that waiver of the submission, all subsequent Inc. (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed
30-day operative delay is consistent amendments, all written statements with the Securities and Exchange
with the protection of investors and the with respect to the proposed rule Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
public interest because the proposal change that are filed with the to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
does not raise any novel issues and Commission, and all written Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
waiver will allow current users of Silexx 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
communications relating to the
to continue to use the platform without change to list and trade shares
proposed rule change between the
interruption. Therefore, the Commission (‘‘Shares’’) of the JPMorgan Managed
Commission and any person, other than
hereby waives the operative delay and Futures ETF (‘‘Fund’’) under NYSE Arca
those that may be withheld from the
designates the proposed rule change Rule 8.600–E. The proposed rule change
public in accordance with the
operative upon filing.30 was published for comment in the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
At any time within 60 days of the available for Web site viewing and Federal Register on October 5, 2017.3
filing of such proposed rule change, the printing in the Commission’s Public On October 25, 2017, the Exchange filed
Commission summarily may Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
temporarily suspend such rule change if Washington, DC 20549 on official change.4 On November 9, 2017, the
it appears to the Commission that such Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to the
business days between the hours of
action is necessary or appropriate in the proposed rule change.5 The Commission
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
public interest, for the protection of filing also will be available for 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of inspection and copying at the principal 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
the purposes of the Act. If the office of the Exchange. All comments 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81766
Commission takes such action, the (September 29, 2017), 82 FR 46566 (‘‘Notice’’).
received will be posted without change.
Commission shall institute proceedings 4 Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change
Persons submitting comments are
to determine whether the proposed rule replaced and superseded the original filing in its
cautioned that we do not redact or edit entirety. In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange
change should be approved or
personal identifying information from clarified (i) the circumstances under which the
disapproved. Fund reserves the right to honor a redemption
comment submissions. You should
request by delivering a basket of securities or cash
IV. Solicitation of Comments submit only information that you wish that differs from the Redemption Instruments (as
to make available publicly. All defined in the Notice); and (ii) that quotation and
Interested persons are invited to submissions should refer to File last sale information for the Shares and for portfolio
submit written data, views, and Number SR–CBOE–2017–068, and holdings of the Fund that are U.S. exchange-listed,
arguments concerning the foregoing, including preferred stocks and REITs, will be
should be submitted on or before available via the Consolidated Tape Association
including whether the proposed rule December 12, 2017. (‘‘CTA’’) high speed line. Amendment No. 1 is
change is consistent with the Act. available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-
Comments may be submitted by any of For the Commission, by the Division of nysearca-2017-86/nysearca201786-2655573-
the following methods: Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 161380.pdf. Amendment No. 1 is not subject to
authority.31 notice and comment because it is a technical
Electronic Comments amendment that does not materially alter the
Eduardo A. Aleman, substance of the proposed rule change or raise any
novel regulatory issues.
• Use the Commission’s Internet Assistant Secretary.
5 Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ [FR Doc. 2017–25144 Filed 11–20–17; 8:45 am]
replaces and supersedes the original filing, as
rules/sro.shtml); or BILLING CODE 8011–01–P modified by Amendment No. 1, in its entirety. In
Amendment No. 2, the Exchange represented that:
• Send an email to rule-comments@ (i) Information regarding market price and trading
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– volume for the Shares will be continually available
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
CBOE–2017–068 on the subject line. on a real-time basis throughout the day on brokers’
computer screens and other electronic services, and
(ii) information regarding the previous day’s closing
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such price and trading volume information for the Shares
shorter time as designated by the Commission. will be published daily in the financial section of
29 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
newspapers. Amendment No. 2 is available at:
30 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nysearca-2017–
operative delay, the Commission also has 86/nysearca201786–2678501–161480.pdf.
considered the proposed rule’s impact on Amendment No. 2 is not subject to notice and
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See comment because it is a technical amendment that
15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 31 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:56 Nov 20, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00106 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM 21NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_55666/page/7.svg)
Document Created: 2017-11-21 00:43:03
Document Modified: 2017-11-21 00:43:03
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 55443 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR