82 FR 55484 - BMW of North America, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 223 (November 21, 2017)
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 223 (November 21, 2017)
| Page Range | 55484-55486 | |
| FR Document | 2017-25168 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 21, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 55484-55486] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-25168] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [Docket No. NHTSA-2016-0025; Notice 2] BMW of North America, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Grant of Petition. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: BMW of North America, LLC (BMW), has determined that certain model year (MY) 2016 BMW 7 Series motor vehicles do not fully comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 108, Lamps, reflective devices and associated equipment. BMW filed a noncompliance report dated January 21, 2016. BMW also petitioned NHTSA on February 12, 2016, for a decision that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information on this decision contact Leroy Angeles, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), telephone (202) 366-5304, facsimile (202) 366-5930. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Overview: BMW of North America, LLC (BMW), has determined that certain model year (MY) 2016 BMW 7 Series motor vehicles do not fully comply with paragraph S7.7.13.3 of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 108, Lamps, reflective devices and associated equipment. BMW filed a noncompliance report dated January 21, 2016, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports. BMW also petitioned NHTSA on February 12, 2016, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556), for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. Notice of receipt of the petition was published with a 30-day public comment period, on March 4, 2016, in the Federal Register (81 FR 11645). One comment was received. To view the petition, comments and all supporting documents log onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at: https://www.regulations.gov/. Then follow the online search instructions to locate docket number ``NHTSA-2016-0025.'' II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately 5,076 MY 2016 BMW 7 Series passenger cars, which were manufactured between August 03, 2015, and November 20, 2015, are potentially involved. III. Noncompliance: BMW states that the rear license plate lamp may not fully conform to paragraph S7.7.13.3 of FMVSS No. 108 because it exceeds the illumination ratio specified in that paragraph. IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S7.7.13.3 of FMVSS No. 108 requires, in pertinent part: S7.7.13.3 The ratio of the average of the two highest illumination values divided by the average of the two lowest illumination values must not exceed 20:1 for vehicles other than motorcycles and motor driven cycles. V. Summary of BMW's Petition: BMW described the subject noncompliance and stated its belief that the noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety for the following reasons:The out-of-specification lamps satisfy all other requirements of FMVSS No. 108. The out-of-specification lamps only deviate from paragraph 7.7.13.3 of FMVSs No. 108 with regard to the lamp's illumination ratio and not the lamp's actual illumination. Personnel who participated in a company assessment reported no difference in their visual perception of the simulated license plates that were used as test specimens. BMW has not received any customer complaints related to the issue. BMW is not aware of any accidents or injuries related to this issue. NHTSA has previously granted petitions in which the illumination of test points remains well above the requirements. Vehicle production has been corrected. In support of its petition, BMW submitted the following information pertaining to laboratory testing and analysis of the subject noncompliance: (1) FMVSS No. 108 Lamp Certification: BMW submitted a test report dated April 7, 2015 pertaining to lamps manufactured by U-SHIN Italia S.p.A. (U-SHIN) prior to vehicle production. According to BMW, this report indicates that the lamp satisfies FMVSS No. 108 requirements, as the ratio of the average of the two highest illumination values divided by the average of the two lowest illumination values is 14.1, and FMVSS No. 108 requires that the value be less than 20. (2) Evaluation by Measurement Equipment: Both BMW and U-SHIN performed a number of tests of both in-specification and out-of- specification lamps to assess the performance of the subject lamps to the pertinent requirement of FMVSS No. 108. BMW submitted one representative test report for each test condition. The results are as follows: --U-SHIN out-of-specification lamp tests: These showed an illumination ratio of 22.0. BMW noted, however, that each of the eight (8) test points satisfies the applicable FMVSS No. 108 photometric (illumination) requirements. --BMW out-of-specification lamp tests: BMW performed its own out-of- specification tests to verify U-SHIN's test results and to obtain results for the lamps when equipped within a vehicle. These showed an illumination ratio of 22.2. BMW noted, however, that each of the eight (8) test points satisfies the applicable FMVSS No. 108 photometric (illumination) requirements. --U-SHIN in-specification lamp tests: These showed an illumination ratio of 13.8. As with the previously described tests, BMW noted, however, that each of the eight (8) test points satisfies the applicable FMVSS No. 108 photometric (illumination) requirements. --BMW in-specification tests: BMW performed their own in-specification tests to verify U-SHIN's test results and to obtain results for the lamps when equipped within a vehicle. These showed an illumination ratio of 13.9. BMW again noted, however, that [[Page 55485]] each of the eight (8) test points satisfies the applicable FMVSS No. 108 photometric (illumination) requirements. (3) Evaluation by human assessment: In addition to the laboratory testing performed by both BMW and U-SHIN using specific lamp measurement equipment, BMW also compared the out-of-specification lamps to the in-specification lamps via human assessment. BMW performed this assessment to determine whether or not the condition caused by the non- compliance was perceptible to other road users (i.e., drivers approaching an affected vehicle) and, if so, its effect on safety. BMW submitted photographs that depict the illumination of a test specimen simulating a rear license plate by both in-specification and out-of-specification lamps. According to BMW, while there may be a slightly perceptible difference in the photographs depicting the test specimen illuminated by in-specification and out-of-specification lamps, this is due to tolerances of the camera equipment related to exposure time and shutter speed. BMW stated that the personnel who participated in this assessment reported no difference in their visual perception of the test specimens. Additionally, BMW noted that even for the out-of-specification lamp, all of the eight (8) test points satisfy the applicable FMVSS No. 108 photometric (illumination) requirements. BMW emphasized that the noncompliance pertains to the illumination ratio, not to the actual lamp illumination. As a consequence, BMW asserts that while the noncompliance condition can be measured in a laboratory, it cannot be detected by the human eye, and therefore drivers of approaching vehicles will be afforded the same level of visibility as if approaching a non-affected vehicle. According to BMW, these analyses support the conclusion that the condition caused by the noncompliance does not affect the safety of affected vehicle occupants or other road users such as drivers approaching affected vehicles. (4) Field Experience: BMW states that its Customer Relations division has not received any contacts from vehicle owners regarding the matter at issue. As a consequence, BMW believes that, consistent with the results of the laboratory tests and human assessments described above, the condition is undetectable to road users such as drivers approaching affected vehicles. BMW further notes that it is not aware of any accidents or injuries that have occurred as a result of the condition. (5) Prior NHTSA Rulings: BMW states that NHTSA has previously granted petitions from other manufacturers involving various issues pertaining to FMVSS No. 108 noncompliance. BMW believes that in some of those petitions, the photometry (illumination) of the test points remains well above the FMVSS No. 108 requirements as the noncompliance has no affect upon the illumination of the test points. (6) Vehicle Production: BMW stated that subsequent vehicle production has been corrected to conform to paragraph 7.7.13.3 of FMVSS No. 108. In summation, BMW expressed the belief that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and that its petition, to exempt BMW from providing notification of the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and remedying the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted. NHTSA's Decision Comments: One comment was received by Mr. Chris Janik. Mr. Janik said ``This is a technical non-compliance that is based only on laboratory measurement and calculation of the illumination ratio. To me, the compelling argument to grant the petition is that there are no customer complaints regarding the issue and that the difference between license plate bulb that comply with the requirements and those that do not is not perceptible to anyone that is behind the vehicle. There is no unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety, so this petition should clearly be granted'' NHTSA thanks Mr. Janik for his comment. NHTSA has reviewed the petition and made its decision based on the reasons described below. NHTSA's Analysis: Based on test data provided by BMW, NHTSA found that the percent difference of the lamp's illumination ratio in the subject vehicles exceed the maximum requirement by 9% to 10.6%. Even though the lamps exceed the illumination ratio the lamps satisfy all other FMVSS No. 108 requirements. However, NTHSA is unable to verify the validity of BMW's claim that this difference cannot be detected by the human eye. License plates are necessary on motor vehicles to allow law enforcement personnel and the general public to uniquely identify vehicles. When it is dark and motor vehicle lighting is in use, the required license plate lamp is necessary to illuminate the license plate on the rear of a vehicle so it can be identified. FMVSS No. 108 contains various photometric and geometric requirements for the purpose of assuring legibility of the license plate. One such requirement is the illumination ratio to protect against shadowing across the license plate, which could make the license plate difficult to read. As in the case of BMW's petition, the burden of establishing the inconsequentiality of a failure to comply with a performance requirement in a standard is substantial and difficult to meet, and the agency has not found many such noncompliances to be inconsequential. However, one area in which the agency has granted such petitions has been where the noncompliance is expected to be imperceptible, or nearly so, to vehicle occupants or approaching drivers. NHTSA found BMW's assessment of human visual perception of the test specimens to be interesting, yet insufficient to justify granting the petition. Instead NHTSA is relying on the test data which indicates that the license plate lamps on these vehicles exceeded the minimum photometric performance levels at each of the eight (8) test points by at least 37.5% and up to 191.3%. This data in conjunction with the fact that the ratio is slightly greater than required, NHTSA would agree that license plates illuminated with these lamps would be legible. Furthermore, NHTSA reiterates that the lamp illumination ratio is an important performance measurement to ensure license plate legibility. NHTSA's Decision: In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA finds that BMW has met its burden of persuasion that the FMVSS No. 108 noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety under these facts and circumstances. Accordingly, BMW's petition is hereby granted and BMW is consequently exempted from the obligation to provide notification of, and remedy for, the subject noncompliance in the affected vehicles under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120. NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively, to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this decision only applies to the subject vehicles that BMW no longer controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed. However, the granting of this petition does not relieve vehicle distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale, or introduction or delivery for [[Page 55486]] introduction into interstate commerce of the noncompliant vehicles under their control after BMW notified them that the subject noncompliance existed. Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8) Jeffrey M. Giuseppe, Associate Administrator for Enforcement. [FR Doc. 2017-25168 Filed 11-20-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
![55484 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 21, 2017 / Notices
Alternative ED2, Effluent Discharge Pipe Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. • BMW is not aware of any accidents
Installed in Runway 31 Runway 108, Lamps, reflective devices and or injuries related to this issue.
Protection Zone (RPZ). These associated equipment. BMW filed a • NHTSA has previously granted
alternatives satisfy the purpose and noncompliance report dated January 21, petitions in which the illumination of
need while minimizing impacts. 2016, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, test points remains well above the
The evaluation of these components Defect and Noncompliance requirements.
in the preferred alternative conducted Responsibility and Reports. BMW also • Vehicle production has been
under the SEA has not resulted in petitioned NHTSA on February 12, corrected.
additional or an increase in impacts 2016, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) In support of its petition, BMW
associated with the proposed action. and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556), for submitted the following information
Based on the analysis in the Final an exemption from the notification and pertaining to laboratory testing and
SEA, the FAA has determined that the remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. analysis of the subject noncompliance:
preferred alternative will not result in Chapter 301 on the basis that this (1) FMVSS No. 108 Lamp
significant impacts to resources noncompliance is inconsequential as it Certification: BMW submitted a test
identified in accordance with FAA relates to motor vehicle safety. report dated April 7, 2015 pertaining to
Orders 1050.1F and 5054.4B. Therefore, Notice of receipt of the petition was lamps manufactured by U–SHIN Italia
an environmental impact statement will published with a 30-day public S.p.A. (U–SHIN) prior to vehicle
not be prepared. comment period, on March 4, 2016, in production. According to BMW, this
the Federal Register (81 FR 11645). One report indicates that the lamp satisfies
Issued in Minneapolis, Minnesota on
October 16, 2017.
comment was received. To view the FMVSS No. 108 requirements, as the
petition, comments and all supporting ratio of the average of the two highest
Andy Peek,
documents log onto the Federal Docket illumination values divided by the
Manager, Dakota-Minnesota Airports District Management System (FDMS) Web site
Office, FAA, Great Lakes Region. average of the two lowest illumination
at: https://www.regulations.gov/. Then values is 14.1, and FMVSS No. 108
[FR Doc. 2017–24741 Filed 11–20–17; 8:45 am]
follow the online search instructions to requires that the value be less than 20.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2016– (2) Evaluation by Measurement
0025.’’ Equipment: Both BMW and U–SHIN
II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately performed a number of tests of both in-
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 5,076 MY 2016 BMW 7 Series passenger specification and out-of-specification
National Highway Traffic Safety cars, which were manufactured between lamps to assess the performance of the
Administration August 03, 2015, and November 20, subject lamps to the pertinent
2015, are potentially involved. requirement of FMVSS No. 108. BMW
[Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0025; Notice 2] III. Noncompliance: BMW states that submitted one representative test report
the rear license plate lamp may not fully for each test condition. The results are
BMW of North America, LLC, Grant of conform to paragraph S7.7.13.3 of
Petition for Decision of as follows:
FMVSS No. 108 because it exceeds the
Inconsequential Noncompliance illumination ratio specified in that —U–SHIN out-of-specification lamp
paragraph. tests: These showed an illumination
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic ratio of 22.0. BMW noted, however,
Safety Administration (NHTSA), IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S7.7.13.3 of
FMVSS No. 108 requires, in pertinent that each of the eight (8) test points
Department of Transportation (DOT). satisfies the applicable FMVSS No.
part:
ACTION: Grant of Petition. 108 photometric (illumination)
S7.7.13.3 The ratio of the average of the requirements.
SUMMARY: BMW of North America, LLC two highest illumination values divided by
the average of the two lowest illumination —BMW out-of-specification lamp tests:
(BMW), has determined that certain BMW performed its own out-of-
model year (MY) 2016 BMW 7 Series values must not exceed 20:1 for vehicles
other than motorcycles and motor driven specification tests to verify U–SHIN’s
motor vehicles do not fully comply with cycles. test results and to obtain results for
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard the lamps when equipped within a
(FMVSS) No. 108, Lamps, reflective V. Summary of BMW’s Petition: BMW
described the subject noncompliance vehicle. These showed an
devices and associated equipment. illumination ratio of 22.2. BMW
BMW filed a noncompliance report and stated its belief that the
noncompliance is inconsequential to noted, however, that each of the eight
dated January 21, 2016. BMW also (8) test points satisfies the applicable
petitioned NHTSA on February 12, motor vehicle safety for the following
reasons: FMVSS No. 108 photometric
2016, for a decision that the subject (illumination) requirements.
noncompliance is inconsequential as it • The out-of-specification lamps
satisfy all other requirements of FMVSS —U–SHIN in-specification lamp tests:
relates to motor vehicle safety. These showed an illumination ratio of
No. 108.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For • The out-of-specification lamps only 13.8. As with the previously
further information on this decision deviate from paragraph 7.7.13.3 of described tests, BMW noted, however,
contact Leroy Angeles, Office of Vehicle FMVSs No. 108 with regard to the that each of the eight (8) test points
Safety Compliance, the National lamp’s illumination ratio and not the satisfies the applicable FMVSS No.
Highway Traffic Safety Administration
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
lamp’s actual illumination. 108 photometric (illumination)
(NHTSA), telephone (202) 366–5304, • Personnel who participated in a requirements.
facsimile (202) 366–5930. company assessment reported no —BMW in-specification tests: BMW
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: difference in their visual perception of performed their own in-specification
I. Overview: BMW of North America, the simulated license plates that were tests to verify U–SHIN’s test results
LLC (BMW), has determined that certain used as test specimens. and to obtain results for the lamps
model year (MY) 2016 BMW 7 Series • BMW has not received any when equipped within a vehicle.
motor vehicles do not fully comply with customer complaints related to the These showed an illumination ratio of
paragraph S7.7.13.3 of Federal Motor issue. 13.9. BMW again noted, however, that
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:56 Nov 20, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00141 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM 21NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_55707/page/1.svg)
![55486 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 21, 2017 / Notices
introduction into interstate commerce of comments. You may do so by calling exceeding the limit. A bank with a
the noncompliant vehicles under their (202) 649–6700 or, for persons who are composite 1 or 2 CAMELS rating
control after BMW notified them that deaf or hearing impaired, TTY, (202) entering a transaction that increases its
the subject noncompliance existed. 649–5597. Upon arrival, visitors will be aggregate bank premises investment to
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: required to present valid government- not more than 150 percent of its capital
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and issued photo identification and submit and surplus may proceed without prior
501.8) to security screening in order to inspect OCC approval, but must provide an
and photocopy comments. after-the-fact notice.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe, All comments received, including • 12 CFR 7.1000(d)(1) (National bank
Associate Administrator for Enforcement. attachments and other supporting ownership of property—Lease financing
[FR Doc. 2017–25168 Filed 11–20–17; 8:45 am] materials, are part of the public record of public facilities). National bank lease
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P and subject to public disclosure. Do not agreements must provide that the lessee
include any information in your will become the owner of the building
comment or supporting materials that or facility upon the expiration of the
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY you consider confidential or lease.
inappropriate for public disclosure. • 12 CFR 7.1014 (Sale of money
Office of the Comptroller of the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: orders at nonbanking outlets). A
Currency Shaquita Merritt, OCC Clearance national bank may designate bonded
Officer, (202) 649–5490, for persons agents to sell the bank’s money orders
Agency Information Collection at nonbanking outlets. The
who are deaf or hard of hearing, TTY,
Activities: Information Collection responsibility of both the bank and its
(202) 649–5597, Legislative and
Renewal; Comment Request; Bank agent should be defined in a written
Regulatory Activities Division, Office of
Activities and Operations; Investment agreement setting forth the duties of
the Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th
in Bank Premises both parties and providing for
Street SW., Washington, DC 20219.
AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the remuneration of the agent.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Currency (OCC), Treasury. • 12 CFR 7.2000(b) (Corporate
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), federal
governance procedures—Other sources
ACTION: Notice and request for comment. agencies must obtain approval from the
of guidance). A national bank shall
OMB for each collection of information
SUMMARY: The OCC, as part of its designate in its bylaws the body of law
that they conduct or sponsor.
continuing effort to reduce paperwork selected for its corporate governance
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined
and respondent burden, invites the procedures.
in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR • 12 CFR 7.2004 (Honorary directors
general public and other federal 1320.3(c) to include agency requests or
agencies to take this opportunity to or advisory boards). Any listing of a
requirements that members of the public national bank’s honorary or advisory
comment on a continuing information submit reports, keep records, or provide
collection as required by the Paperwork directors must distinguish between
information to a third party. Section those directors and the bank’s board of
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA). 3506(c)(2)(A) of title 44 requires federal
In accordance with the requirements directors or indicate their advisory
agencies to provide a 60-day notice in status.
of the PRA, the OCC may not conduct the Federal Register concerning each
or sponsor, and the respondent is not • 12 CFR 7.2014(b) (Indemnification
proposed collection of information, of institution-affiliated parties—
required to respond to, an information including each proposed extension of an
collection unless it displays a currently Administrative proceeding or civil
existing collection of information, actions not initiated by a federal
valid Office of Management and Budget before submitting the collection to OMB
(OMB) control number. agency). A national bank shall designate
for approval. in its bylaws the body of law selected
The OCC is soliciting comment Title: Bank Activities and Operations;
concerning the renewal of its for making indemnification payments.
Investment in Bank Premises. • 12 CFR 7.2024(a) (Staggered terms
information collection titled, ‘‘Bank OMB Control No.: 1557–0204.
Activities and Operations; Investment in for national bank directors). Any
Description: The information national bank may adopt bylaws that
Bank Premises.’’ collection requirements ensure that
DATES: You should submit written
provide for the staggering the terms of
institutions conduct their operations in its directors. National banks shall
comments by January 22, 2018. a safe and sound manner and in provide the OCC with copies of any
ADDRESSES: Because paper mail in the accordance with applicable federal bylaws so amended.
Washington, DC area and at the OCC is banking statutes and regulations. The • 12 CFR 7.2024(c) (Size of bank
subject to delay, commenters are information is necessary for regulatory board). A national bank seeking to
encouraged to submit comments by and examination purposes. increase the number of its directors
email, if possible. Comments may be The information collection must notify the OCC any time the
sent to: Legislative and Regulatory requirements are as follows: proposed size would exceed 25
Activities Division, Office of the • 12 CFR 5.37 (Investment in national directors.
Comptroller of the Currency, Attention: bank or federal savings association Type of Review: Extension of a
1557–0204, 400 7th Street SW., Suite premises). A national bank or federal currently approved collection.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
3E–218, Washington, DC 20219. In savings association may invest in Affected Public: Businesses or other
addition, comments may be sent by fax banking premises and other premises- for-profit.
to (571) 465–4326 or by email to related investments, loans, or Estimated Number of Respondents:
prainfo@occ.treas.gov. You may indebtedness by filing an application for 1,294.
personally inspect and photocopy prior approval whenever its investment Estimated Total Annual Burden: 611
comments at the OCC, 400 7th Street in bank premises will cause it to exceed hours.
SW., Washington, DC 20219. For its capital stock. The application must Frequency of Response: On occasion.
security reasons, the OCC requires that describe the present and proposed Comments submitted in response to
visitors make an appointment to inspect investment and the business reason for this notice will be summarized and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:56 Nov 20, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00143 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM 21NON1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_55707/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-11-21 00:42:56
Document Modified: 2017-11-21 00:42:56
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Grant of Petition. | |
| Contact | For further information on this decision contact Leroy Angeles, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), telephone (202) 366-5304, facsimile (202) 366-5930. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 55484 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR