82 FR 5642 - Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; General Motors LLC
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 11 (January 18, 2017)
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 11 (January 18, 2017)
| Page Range | 5642-5644 | |
| FR Document | 2017-00977 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 5642-5644] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-00977] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; General Motors LLC AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This document grants in full the General Motors LLC's (GM) petition for an exemption of the Chevrolet Volt vehicle line in accordance with 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard. This petition is granted because the agency has determined that the antitheft device to be placed on the line as standard equipment is likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541, Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard (Theft Prevention Standard). DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with the 2018 model year (MY). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Deborah Mazyck, Office of International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, W43- 443, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Mazyck's phone number is (202) 366-4139. Her fax number is (202) 493-2990. [[Page 5643]] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated October 6, 2016, GM requested an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard for the Chevrolet Volt vehicle line beginning with MY 2018. The petition requested an exemption from parts-marking pursuant to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard, based on the installation of an antitheft device as standard equipment for the entire vehicle line. Under 49 CFR part 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to grant an exemption for one vehicle line per model year. In its petition, GM provided a detailed description and diagram of the identity, design, and location of the components of the antitheft device for the MY 2018 Chevrolet Volt vehicle line. GM stated that its Chevrolet Volt vehicle line will be installed with the PASS-Key III+ antitheft device as standard equipment. The PASS-Key III+ is a passive, transponder based, electronic engine immobilizer antitheft device. GM stated that a keyless ignition system will be installed on its Chevrolet Volt vehicle line. Key components of its PASS-Key III+ system will include an electronically-coded ignition key, a body control module (BCM) with integrated PASS-Key III+ controller, engine control module (ECM), immobilizer exciter module, radio frequency (RF) receiver module, passive antenna module and low frequency antennas (LF). The electronic key is incorporated within a remote key fob. The key fob contains buttons to perform normal remote keyless door entry functions. GM stated that the device will provide protection against unauthorized use (i.e., starting and engine fueling), but will not provide any visible or audible indication of unauthorized vehicle entry (i.e., flashing lights or horn alarm). GM's submission is considered a complete petition as required by 49 CFR 543.7, in that it meets the general requirements contained in Sec. 543.5 and the specific content requirements of Sec. 543.6. In addressing the specific content requirements of 543.6, GM provided information on the reliability and durability of its proposed device. To ensure reliability and durability of the device, GM conducted tests based on its own specified standards. GM provided information on the specific tests it uses to validate the integrity, durability and reliability of the PASS-Key III+ device and believes that the device is reliable and durable since the components must operate as designed after each test. GM also stated that the design and assembly processes of the PASS-Key III+ subsystem and components are validated for 10 years of vehicle life and 150,000 miles of performance. The PASS-Key III+ incorporates a higher level of electrical sophistication by utilizing an electronic key that is protected from electrical duplication. GM stated that the PASS-Key III+ device is designed to be active at all times without direct intervention by the vehicle operator. No separate intentional action to turn on the security system is needed to achieve protection. Activation of the device occurs when the operator pushes the engine Start/Stop switch to the ``OFF'' position. Deactivation of the immobilizer device occurs when a valid key and matching immobilization code is verified, allowing the engine to start and continue normal operations. When the operator pushes the Engine Start/Stop switch to begin vehicle operation, the vehicle transmits randomly generated data and a vehicle identifier within the passenger compartment of the vehicle through three low-frequency antennas that is controlled by the passive antenna module. The electronic key receives the data and compares its vehicle identifier with the identifier previously assigned to the vehicle. If the vehicle identifier matches the identifier of the vehicle for which the key is programmed, the electronic key will transmit a response through the RF channel to a vehicle mounted receiver. The PASS-Key III+ control module receives the RF transmission and compares the received response with an internally calculated response. If the values match, the key is recognized as valid and a password is then transmitted through a serial data link to the ECM to enable fueling and vehicle starting. If an invalid key code is detected, the system will not transmit a password to the ECM to allow operation of the vehicle. Additionally, if an invalid electronic key code is received, the vehicle will not be allowed to transition from the ``Off'' mode to the ``Accessory'', ``On'', or ``Start'' mode positions inhibiting starting, ignition, and fuel flow of the vehicle. GM further stated that the ignition key contains electronics which provides billions of possible electronic combinations. The electronics receive energy and data from the antenna module. Upon receipt of the data, and a vehicle indicator match, the electronic key will calculate a response to the data using an internal encryption algorithm and transmit the response back to the vehicle. The antenna module then translates the radio frequency signal received from the key into a digital signal and passes the signal on to the controller module. The controller module then compares the received response to an internally calculated value. If the values match, the key is recognized as valid and a password is transmitted through a serial data link to the ECM to enable fueling and vehicle starting. GM also stated that a secondary data challenge and response process using another encryption algorithm must be validated by the engine controller to allow continued operation. If an invalid key code is received, the PASS-Key III+ controller module will send a ``Disable Password'' to the engine control module and starting, ignition, and fuel flow will be inhibited. GM stated that the PASS-Key III+ device has been designed to enhance the functionality and theft protection provided by its first, second and third generation PASS-Key, PASS-Key II, and PASS-Key III devices. GM also referenced data provided by the American Automobile Manufacturers Association (AAMA) in support of the effectiveness of GM's PASS-Key devices in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft found in the AAMA's comments referencing the agency's Preliminary Report on ``Auto Theft and Recovery Effects of the Anti-Car Theft Act of 1992 and the Motor Vehicle Theft Law Enforcement Act of 1984'', (Docket 97-042; Notice 1). GM also noted that theft data have indicated a decline in theft rates for vehicle lines equipped with comparable devices that have received full exemptions from the parts-marking requirements. GM stated that the theft data, as provided by the Federal Bureau of Investigation's National Crime Information Center (NCIC) and compiled by the agency, show that theft rates are lower for exempted GM models equipped with the PASS-Key like systems than the theft rates for earlier models with similar appearance and construction that were parts-marked. Based on the performance of the PASS-Key, PASS-Key II, and PASS-Key III devices on other GM models, and the advanced technology utilized in PASS-Key III+, GM believes that the PASS-Key III+ device will be more effective in deterring theft than the parts- marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541. GM stated that it believes that PASS-Key III+ devices will be at least as effective in deterring theft as the parts-marking requirements and that the agency should find that installation of the PASS-Key III+ device on the Chevrolet Volt vehicle line is sufficient to qualify it for full exemption from the parts-marking requirements. [[Page 5644]] Based on the evidence submitted by GM, the agency believes that the antitheft device for the Chevrolet Volt vehicle line is likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR 541). GM's proposed device lacks an audible or visible alarm. Therefore, this device cannot perform one of the functions listed in 49 CFR part 543.6(a)(3), that is, to call attention to unauthorized attempts to enter or move the vehicle. The agency concludes that the device will provide the four of the five types of performance listed in Sec. 543.6(a)(3): Promoting activation; preventing defeat or circumvention of the device by unauthorized persons; preventing operation of the vehicle by unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the reliability and durability of the device. Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants a petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements of part 541 either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of part 541. The agency finds that GM has provided adequate reasons for its belief that the antitheft device for the Chevrolet Volt vehicle line is likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541). This conclusion is based on the information GM provided about its device. For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full GM's petition for exemption for the Chevrolet Volt vehicle line from the parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541 beginning with the 2018 model year. The agency notes that 49 CFR part 541, Appendix A-1, identifies those lines that are exempted from the Theft Prevention Standard for a given model year. 49 CFR part 543.7(f) contains publication requirements incident to the disposition of all part 543 petitions. Advanced listing, including the release of future product nameplates, the beginning model year for which the petition is granted and a general description of the antitheft device is necessary in order to notify law enforcement agencies of new vehicle lines exempted from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard. If GM decides not to use the exemption for this line, it should formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the line must be fully marked according to the requirements under 49 CFR parts 541.5 and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement parts). NHTSA notes that if GM wishes in the future to modify the device on which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit a petition to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d) states that a part 543 exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted under this part and equipped with the antitheft device on which the line's exemption is based. Further, part 543.9(c)(2) provides for the submission of petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use of an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified in that exemption.'' The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that part 543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself. The agency did not intend in drafting part 543 to require the submission of a modification petition for every change to the components or design of an antitheft device. The significance of many such changes could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the manufacturer contemplates making any changes, the effects of which might be characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency before preparing and submitting a petition to modify. Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.95. Raymond R. Posten, Associate Administrator for Rulemaking. [FR Doc. 2017-00977 Filed 1-17-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
![5642 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2017 / Notices
between June 29, 2016 and October 10, (c) The tilt-lock function of the ELR is duties found in sections 30118 and
2016 are potentially involved: compliant, and locks at angles greater 30120, respectively, to notify owners,
• 2017 BMW X1 SAV (X1 sDrive28i, X1 than 15-deg up to 41-deg when purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
xDrive28i) subjected to the FMVSS No. 209 Section noncompliance and to remedy the
• 2017 BMW 5 Series Gran Turismo S4.3(j)(2) rollover requirements. defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any
(535i Gran Turismo, 535i xDrive Gran (d) The ELR also contains a voluntary decision on this petition only applies to
Turismo, 550i xDrive Gran Turismo) webbing-sensitive locking mechanism the subject vehicles that BMW no longer
• 2016 BMW 5 Series (528i, 528i which provides crash and rollover controlled at the time it determined that
xDrive, 535i, 535i xDrive, 550i, 550i restraint performance comparable to the the noncompliance existed. However,
xDrive, M5) performance provided by an FMVSS No. any decision on this petition does not
• 2016 BMW 5 Series (535d, 535d 209 compliant vehicle-sensitive locking relieve vehicle distributors and dealers
xDrive) mechanism. of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
• 2016 Mini Cooper Clubman and Mini (e) Crash test results comparing sale, or introduction or delivery for
Cooper S Clubman FMVSS No. 209 S4.3(j)(2)(ii) compliant introduction into interstate commerce of
• Mini Hardtop 4-door Cooper and Mini ELRs and ELRs in which the vehicle- the noncompliant vehicles under their
Hardtop 4-door Cooper S sensitive locking mechanism has been control after BMW notified them that
• 2017 Rolls-Royce Ghost disabled (to demonstrate a ‘‘worst-case the subject noncompliance existed.
III. Noncompliance scenario’’, even though in affected
vehicles the vehicle-sensitive Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
BMW explains that the delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
mechanism remains functional)
noncompliance involves the Emergency 501.8.
demonstrate comparable results
Locking Retractor (ELR) in the safety
according to FMVSS No. 208 Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
belt assembly of the vehicle’s front left
assessments. Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
seat. These ELRs are equipped with a Test results indicate that any
vehicle-sensitive locking mechanism [FR Doc. 2017–01005 Filed 1–17–17; 8:45 am]
performance differences are with
and a webbing-sensitive locking normal ‘‘data scatter’’ and are attributed
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
mechanism. The noncompliance to test tolerances.
specifically involves the vehicle- (f) Affected safety belt assemblies
sensitive locking mechanism, which DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
comply with all other applicable
does not lock as designed when provisions of FMVSS No. 209.
subjected to the requirements of National Highway Traffic Safety
(g) NHTSA previously granted a Administration
paragraph S4.3(j)(2)(ii) of FMVSS No. petition from General Motors in which
209. the ELR’s vehicle-sensitive locking Petition for Exemption From the
IV. Rule Text mechanism was completely non- Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
functional, whereas the ELR’s vehicle- Standard; General Motors LLC
Paragraph S4.3 of FMVSS No. 209
sensitive locking mechanism in the
states in pertinent part: AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
affected BMW vehicles is functional, but
S4.3 Requirements for hardware . . . may experience a slight exceedance of Safety Administration, Department of
(j) Emergency-locking retractor . . . the FMVSS no. 209 S4.3(j)(2)(ii) Transportation (DOT).
(2) For seat belt assemblies manufactured
requirement. ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
on or after February 22, 2007 and for
manufacturers opting for early compliance.
(h) BMW has not received any
An emergency-locking retractor of a Type 1 customer complaints related to this SUMMARY: This document grants in full
or Type 2 seat belt assembly, when tested in issue. the General Motors LLC’s (GM) petition
accordance with the procedures specified in (i) BMW is not aware of any accidents for an exemption of the Chevrolet Volt
paragraph S5.2(j)(2) . . . or injuries related to this issue. vehicle line in accordance with 49 CFR
(ii) Shall lock before the webbing payout (j) Vehicle production has been part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
exceeds the maximum limit of 25 mm when corrected. Prevention Standard. This petition is
the retractor is subjected to an acceleration of BMW concluded by expressing the granted because the agency has
0.7 g under the applicable test conditions of belief that the subject noncompliance is
S5.2(j)(2)(iii)(A) or (B). The retractor is
determined that the antitheft device to
determined to be locked when the webbing
inconsequential as it relates to motor be placed on the line as standard
belt load tension is at least 35 N. vehicle safety, and that its petition to be equipment is likely to be as effective in
exempted from providing notification of reducing and deterring motor vehicle
V. Summary of BMW’s Petition the noncompliance, as required by 49 theft as compliance with the parts-
BMW described the subject U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the marking requirements of 49 CFR part
noncompliance and stated its belief that noncompliance, as required by 49 541, Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
the noncompliance is inconsequential U.S.C. 30120, should be granted. Prevention Standard (Theft Prevention
as it relates to motor vehicle safety. To view BMW’s petition, test data and Standard).
In support of its petition, BMW analyses in its entirety you can visit
submitted the following reasoning: https://www.regulations.gov by DATES: The exemption granted by this
(a) The vehicle-sensitive locking following the online instructions for notice is effective beginning with the
mechanism functions, but the non- accessing the dockets and by using the 2018 model year (MY).
compliance involves a slight exceedance docket ID number for this petition FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
of the FMVSS No. 209 Section shown in the heading of this notice. Deborah Mazyck, Office of International
S4.3(j)(2)(ii) requirement. NHTSA notes that the statutory Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer
(b) The slight exceedance is such that, provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and Programs, NHTSA, W43–443, 1200 New
based upon testing of non-compliant 30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
units, the vehicle-sensitive locking file petitions for a determination of 20590. Ms. Mazyck’s phone number is
mechanism locks at approximately 1.0g inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to (202) 366–4139. Her fax number is (202)
within 25mm, or at 0.7 g within 90mm. exempt manufacturers only from the 493–2990.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:41 Jan 17, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00121 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18JAN1.SGM 18JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_5653/page/1.svg)
![5644 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 2017 / Notices
Based on the evidence submitted by If GM decides not to use the Devices and Associated Equipment. GM
GM, the agency believes that the exemption for this line, it should has filed a noncompliance report dated
antitheft device for the Chevrolet Volt formally notify the agency. If such a March 2, 2015. GM also petitioned
vehicle line is likely to be as effective decision is made, the line must be fully NHTSA on March 24, 2015, for a
in reducing and deterring motor vehicle marked according to the requirements decision that the subject noncompliance
theft as compliance with the parts- under 49 CFR parts 541.5 and 541.6 is inconsequential as it relates to motor
marking requirements of the Theft (marking of major component parts and vehicle safety.
Prevention Standard (49 CFR 541). replacement parts). ADDRESSES: For further information on
GM’s proposed device lacks an NHTSA notes that if GM wishes in the the decision contact Mike Cole, Office of
audible or visible alarm. Therefore, this future to modify the device on which Vehicle Safety Compliance, the National
device cannot perform one of the this exemption is based, the company Highway Traffic Safety Administration
functions listed in 49 CFR part may have to submit a petition to modify (NHTSA), telephone (202) 366–5319,
543.6(a)(3), that is, to call attention to the exemption. Part 543.7(d) states that facsimile (202) 366–3081.
unauthorized attempts to enter or move a part 543 exemption applies only to
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
the vehicle. The agency concludes that vehicles that belong to a line exempted
the device will provide the four of the under this part and equipped with the I. Overview
five types of performance listed in antitheft device on which the line’s
General Motors, LLC, (GM) has
§ 543.6(a)(3): Promoting activation; exemption is based. Further, part
543.9(c)(2) provides for the submission determined that certain model year
preventing defeat or circumvention of (MY) 2012–2015 Chevrolet Sonic
the device by unauthorized persons; of petitions ‘‘to modify an exemption to
permit the use of an antitheft device passenger cars do not fully comply with
preventing operation of the vehicle by paragraph S6.5.3.4.1 of Federal Motor
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the similar to but differing from the one
specified in that exemption.’’ Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
reliability and durability of the device. 108, Lamps, Reflective Devices and
The agency wishes to minimize the
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 Associated Equipment. GM has filed a
administrative burden that part
CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants a noncompliance report dated March 2,
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted
petition for exemption from the parts- 2015, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573,
vehicle manufacturers and itself. The
marking requirements of part 541 either Defect and Noncompliance
agency did not intend in drafting part
in whole or in part, if it determines that, Responsibility and Reports. GM also
543 to require the submission of a
based upon substantial evidence, the petitioned NHTSA on March 24, 2015,
modification petition for every change
standard equipment antitheft device is pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
to the components or design of an
likely to be as effective in reducing and 30120(h) (see implementing rule at 49
antitheft device. The significance of
deterring motor vehicle theft as CFR part 556) for an exemption from the
many such changes could be de
compliance with the parts-marking notification and remedy requirements of
minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests
requirements of part 541. The agency 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that
that if the manufacturer contemplates
finds that GM has provided adequate this noncompliance is inconsequential
making any changes, the effects of
reasons for its belief that the antitheft to motor vehicle safety.
which might be characterized as de
device for the Chevrolet Volt vehicle Notice of receipt of the GM petition
minimis, it should consult the agency
line is likely to be as effective in was published, with a 30-day public
before preparing and submitting a
reducing and deterring motor vehicle comment period, on May 12, 2015, in
petition to modify.
theft as compliance with the parts- the Federal Register (80 FR 27229). No
marking requirements of the Theft Issued in Washington, DC, under authority comments were received. To view the
Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541). delegated in 49 CFR 1.95.
petition and all supporting documents
This conclusion is based on the Raymond R. Posten,
log onto the Federal Docket
information GM provided about its Associate Administrator for Rulemaking. Management System (FDMS) Web site
device. [FR Doc. 2017–00977 Filed 1–17–17; 8:45 am] at: http://www.regulations.gov/. Then
For the foregoing reasons, the agency BILLING CODE 4910–59–P follow the online search instructions to
hereby grants in full GM’s petition for locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2015–
exemption for the Chevrolet Volt 0035.’’
vehicle line from the parts-marking DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
requirements of 49 CFR part 541 II. Vehicles Involved
National Highway Traffic Safety
beginning with the 2018 model year. Affected are approximately 310,243
Administration
The agency notes that 49 CFR part 541, MY 2012–2015 Chevrolet Sonic
Appendix A–1, identifies those lines [Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0035; Notice 2] passenger cars manufactured between
that are exempted from the Theft May 5, 2011 and February 4, 2015.
Prevention Standard for a given model General Motors, LLC, Grant of Petition
for Decision of Inconsequential III. Noncompliance:
year. 49 CFR part 543.7(f) contains
publication requirements incident to the Noncompliance GM explains that the noncompliance
disposition of all part 543 petitions. AGENCY: National Highway Traffic is that the high-beam headlamp lenses
Advanced listing, including the release Safety Administration (NHTSA), on the subject vehicles are not marked
of future product nameplates, the Department of Transportation (DOT) with ‘‘HB3’’ (the HB bulb type) as
beginning model year for which the required by paragraph S6.5.3.4.1 of
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
ACTION: Grant of petition
petition is granted and a general FMVSS No. 108.
description of the antitheft device is SUMMARY: General Motors, LLC, (GM) IV. Rule Text
necessary in order to notify law has determined that certain model year
enforcement agencies of new vehicle (MY) 2012–2015 Chevrolet Sonic Paragraph S6.5.3.4.1 of FMVSS No.
lines exempted from the parts-marking passenger cars do not fully comply with 108 requires in pertinent part:
requirements of the Theft Prevention Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard S6.5.3.4.1 The lens of each replaceable
Standard. (FMVSS) No. 108, Lamps, Reflective bulb headlamp must bear permanent marking
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:41 Jan 17, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00123 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18JAN1.SGM 18JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_5653/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-01 15:19:35
Document Modified: 2018-02-01 15:19:35
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Grant of petition for exemption. | |
| Dates | The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with the 2018 model year (MY). | |
| Contact | Ms. Deborah Mazyck, Office of International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, W43- 443, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Mazyck's phone number is (202) 366-4139. Her fax number is (202) 493-2990. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 5642 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR