82 FR 56990 - Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Incidental Take Permit Application; Proposed Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for the Coastal California Gnatcatcher and Associated Documents; Brea, California
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 230 (December 1, 2017)
Fish and Wildlife Service
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 230 (December 1, 2017)
| Page Range | 56990-56992 | |
| FR Document | 2017-25889 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 230 (Friday, December 1, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 56990-56992] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-25889] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS-R8-ES-2017-N107; FXES11140800000-178-FF08ECAR00] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Incidental Take Permit Application; Proposed Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for the Coastal California Gnatcatcher and Associated Documents; Brea, California AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, have received an application from Orange County Waste & Recycling for a 5-year incidental take permit for the threatened coastal California gnatcatcher pursuant to the Endangered Species Act. We are requesting comments on the permit application and on our preliminary determination that the applicant's accompanying proposed habitat conservation plan qualifies as low effect, eligible for a categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act. The basis for this determination is discussed in our environmental action statement and associated low- effect screening form, which are also available for public review. DATES: Written comments should be received on or before January 2, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submitting Comments: You may submit comments by one of the following methods:U.S. Mail: Field Supervisor, Fish and Wildlife Service, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office, 2177 Salk Avenue, Suite 250, Carlsbad, CA 92008. Fax: Field Supervisor, 760-431-9624. Email: [email protected]; please include ``Olinda Alpha Landfill HCP'' in the subject line. Obtaining Documents: You may obtain copies of the proposed HCP and EAS on the Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife's HCP Web site at https://www.fws.gov/carlsbad/HCPs/HCP_Docs.html. To request copies of the application, proposed HCP, and EAS, contact the Service immediately, by telephone at 760-431-9440 or by letter to the Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES). Copies of the proposed HCP and EAS also are available for public inspection during regular business hours at the Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Karen Goebel, Assistant Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES); telephone: 760-431-9440. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), please call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 800-877- 8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), have received an application from Orange County Waste & Recycling (applicant) for a 5-year incidental take permit for one covered species pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.; ESA). The application addresses the potential ``take'' of the threatened coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica; gnatcatcher) in the course of activities associated with the construction, operation, and maintenance of the Olinda Alpha Landfill projects, in the City of Brea, Orange County, California. A conservation program to avoid, minimize, and mitigate for project activities would be implemented as described in the applicant's proposed habitat conservation plan (HCP). We are requesting comments on the permit application and on our preliminary determination that the proposed HCP qualifies as a low- effect HCP, eligible for a categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.; NEPA). The basis for this determination is discussed in our environmental action statement (EAS) and associated low-effect screening form, which are also available for public review. Background Section 9 of the ESA and its implementing Federal regulations prohibit the take of animal species listed as endangered or threatened. ``Take'' is defined under the ESA as to ``harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect listed animal species, or to attempt to engage in such conduct'' (16 U.S.C. 1538). ``Harm'' includes significant habitat modification or degradation that actually kills or injures listed wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns such as breeding, feeding, or sheltering (50 CFR 17.3). However, under section 10(a) of the ESA, the Service may issue permits to authorize incidental take of listed species. ``Incidental taking'' is defined by the ESA implementing regulations as taking that is incidental to, and not the purpose of, carrying out an otherwise lawful activity (50 CFR 17.3). Regulations governing incidental take permits for endangered and threatened species, respectively, are found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 50 CFR 17.22 and 50 CFR 17.32. Applicant's Proposed Project The applicant requests a 5-year permit under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA. If we approve the permit, the applicant anticipates taking gnatcatcher as a result of permanent impacts to 5.78 acres (ac) of coastal sage scrub habitat that the species uses for breeding, feeding, and sheltering, as well as 2.85 ac of nonnative grassland habitat that may support gnatcatcher foraging and/or dispersal. The take would be incidental to the applicant's activities associated with the construction of the Olinda Alpha Landfill projects in the City of Brea, California, and includes restoration and in-perpetuity [[Page 56991]] preservation and management of 11.56 ac of gnatcatcher habitat. The Olinda Alpha Landfill projects propose to construct a desilting basin, perform a partial cap closure, install screening trees for the Brea Power Plant, and construct a winch concrete pad on 12.56 ac located on the 565-ac Olinda Alpha Landfill property in the City of Brea. The project will permanently impact 5.78 ac of coastal California gnatcatcher-occupied coastal sage scrub habitat as a result of clearing and grading activities. To minimize take of coastal California gnatcatcher by the Olinda Alpha Landfill projects and to offset impacts to its habitat, the applicant proposes to mitigate for permanent impacts to 5.78 ac of occupied gnatcatcher coastal sage scrub habitat through the restoration, conservation, and in-perpetuity management of 11.56 ac of coastal sage scrub suitable for the gnatcatcher by a Service-approved restoration contractor and the Puente Hills Habitat Preservation Authority. The applicant's proposed HCP also contains the following proposed measures to minimize the effects of construction activities on the gnatcatcher: Prior to the initiation of work activities on the project sites, grading limits will be clearly delineated with flagging and/or temporary fencing and silt fencing, as necessary, to help guide work activities and avoid impacts to areas beyond the project boundaries. Prior to the initiation of work activities on the project sites, a Service-approved biologist will conduct a brief training session for all project personnel regarding the conservation measures and regulations described herein, as well as general information and methods that will help avoid and minimize disturbance to the gnatcatcher in the vicinity of project activities. A Service-approved biologist will monitor grading of the site daily (or as determined necessary by the monitoring biologist) and provide a letter summarizing compliance with this HCP and the construction limits of the proposed projects to the Service within 1 month of completion of grading. Vegetation clearing will take place outside of the bird nesting season (February 15 through August 31) to the fullest extent practicable. Clearing may only occur during this period once a Service- approved biologist has conducted at least three surveys of the impact areas for nesting birds, with each survey taking place 1 week apart, and the last survey conducted within 24 hours prior to clearing. The qualified biologist will document compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and other applicable regulations that protect nesting birds. If an active bird nest is observed, a 300-foot buffer must be established, within which no project activities will occur until the nest is no longer active. A reduced buffer may be established by the monitoring biologist if it is deemed appropriate and will not result in the alteration of nesting behaviors. To fulfill this measure, all project activities that are deemed necessary to occur during the bird nesting season will be monitored by the qualified biologist, as well as any active nest detected in the vicinity of project activities. Project sites will be kept as clean as possible to avoid attracting predators. All food-related trash will be placed in sealed bins or removed from the site regularly. Staging areas for each project will be limited to developed or previously disturbed areas. Proposed Action and Alternatives The Proposed Action consists of the issuance of an incidental take permit and implementation of the proposed HCP, which includes measures to avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts to the gnatcatcher. If we approve the permit, take of gnatcatcher would be authorized for the applicant's activities associated with the construction of the Olinda Alpha Landfill projects. In the proposed HCP, the applicant considers alternatives to the taking of gnatcatcher under the proposed action. Alternative development configurations for each project component were considered; however, because of site-specific regulatory requirements and the topography of the site, further avoidance of impacts to coastal California gnatcatcher habitat could not be achieved. The applicant also considered the No Action Alternative. Under the No Action Alternative, no incidental take of coastal California gnatcatcher resulting from habitat modification would occur, and no long-term protection and management would be afforded to the species. Our Preliminary Determination The Service has made a preliminary determination that approval of the HCP and issuance of an incidental take permit qualify for categorical exclusion under NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), as provided by the Department of the Interior implementing regulations in part 46 of title 43 of the Code of Federal Regulations (43 CFR 46.205, 46.210, and 46.215), and that the HCP qualifies as a low-effect plan as defined by the Habitat Conservation Planning Handbook (December 2016). We base our determination that a HCP qualifies as a low-effect plan on the following three criteria: (1) Implementation of the HCP would result in minor or negligible effects on federally listed, proposed, and candidate species and their habitats; (2) Implementation of the HCP would result in minor or negligible effects on other environmental values or resources; and (3) Impacts of the HCP, considered together with the impacts of other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable similarly situated projects, would not result, over time, in cumulative effects to environmental values or resources that would be considered significant. Based upon this preliminary determination, we do not intend to prepare further NEPA documentation. We will consider public comments in making the final determination on whether to prepare such additional documentation. Next Steps We will evaluate the proposed HCP and comments we receive to determine whether the permit application meets the requirements and issuance criteria under section 10(a) of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). We will also evaluate whether issuance of a section 10(a)(1)(B) incidental take permit would comply with section 7 of the ESA by conducting an intra-Service consultation. We will use the results of this consultation, in combination with the above findings, in our final analysis to determine whether or not to issue a permit. If the requirements and issuance criteria under section 10(a) are met, we will issue the permit to the applicant for incidental take of gnatcatcher. Public Comments If you wish to comment on the permit application, proposed HCP, and associated documents, you may submit comments by any of the methods noted in the ADDRESSES section. Public Availability of Comments Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you may ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. [[Page 56992]] Authority We provide this notice under section 10 of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1506.6). Scott A. Sobiech, Acting Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office, Carlsbad, California. [FR Doc. 2017-25889 Filed 11-30-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4333-15-P
![56990 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 230 / Friday, December 1, 2017 / Notices
Next Steps permit for the threatened coastal maintenance of the Olinda Alpha
We will evaluate the ITP application, California gnatcatcher pursuant to the Landfill projects, in the City of Brea,
associated documents, and public Endangered Species Act. We are Orange County, California. A
comments in reaching a final decision requesting comments on the permit conservation program to avoid,
on whether the application meets the application and on our preliminary minimize, and mitigate for project
determination that the applicant’s activities would be implemented as
requirements of section 10(a) of the ESA
accompanying proposed habitat described in the applicant’s proposed
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The HCP and
conservation plan qualifies as low habitat conservation plan (HCP).
EA may change in response to public We are requesting comments on the
effect, eligible for a categorical
comments. After completion of the EA, permit application and on our
exclusion under the National
we will determine whether the preliminary determination that the
Environmental Policy Act. The basis for
proposed action warrants a finding of no proposed HCP qualifies as a low-effect
this determination is discussed in our
significant impact or whether an HCP, eligible for a categorical exclusion
environmental action statement and
environmental impact statement should under the National Environmental
associated low-effect screening form,
be prepared. We will also evaluate Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42
which are also available for public
whether the proposed ITP action would U.S.C. 4321 et seq.; NEPA). The basis for
review.
comply with the requirements of section this determination is discussed in our
7 of the ESA by conducting a formal DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before January 2, 2018. environmental action statement (EAS)
consultation on the proposed ITP and associated low-effect screening
action. We will use the results of this ADDRESSES: Submitting Comments: You
form, which are also available for public
consultation, in combination with the may submit comments by one of the review.
above findings, in our final analysis to following methods:
determine whether or not to issue an • U.S. Mail: Field Supervisor, Fish Background
ITP. If the requirements are met, we will and Wildlife Service, Carlsbad Fish and Section 9 of the ESA and its
issue the ITP to the applicant. We will Wildlife Office, 2177 Salk Avenue, Suite implementing Federal regulations
not make our final decision until after 250, Carlsbad, CA 92008. prohibit the take of animal species listed
the end of the 45-day public comment • Fax: Field Supervisor, 760–431– as endangered or threatened. ‘‘Take’’ is
period, and we will fully consider all 9624. defined under the ESA as to ‘‘harass,
comments and information we receive • Email: fw8cfwocomments@fws.gov; harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill,
during the public comment period. please include ‘‘Olinda Alpha Landfill trap, capture, or collect listed animal
HCP’’ in the subject line. species, or to attempt to engage in such
Authority Obtaining Documents: You may
conduct’’ (16 U.S.C. 1538). ‘‘Harm’’
We provide this notice in accordance obtain copies of the proposed HCP and
includes significant habitat modification
with the requirements of section 10(c) of EAS on the Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife’s
or degradation that actually kills or
the ESA and its implementing HCP Web site at https://www.fws.gov/
injures listed wildlife by significantly
regulations (50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32) carlsbad/HCPs/HCP_Docs.html. To
impairing essential behavioral patterns
and NEPA and its implementing request copies of the application, such as breeding, feeding, or sheltering
regulations (40 CFR 1506.6). proposed HCP, and EAS, contact the (50 CFR 17.3). However, under section
Service immediately, by telephone at 10(a) of the ESA, the Service may issue
Dated: September 14, 2017. 760–431–9440 or by letter to the
Theresa E. Rabot, permits to authorize incidental take of
Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office (see listed species. ‘‘Incidental taking’’ is
Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Region, U.S. ADDRESSES). Copies of the proposed
Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. defined by the ESA implementing
HCP and EAS also are available for regulations as taking that is incidental
[FR Doc. 2017–25875 Filed 11–30–17; 8:45 am] public inspection during regular to, and not the purpose of, carrying out
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P business hours at the Carlsbad Fish and an otherwise lawful activity (50 CFR
Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES). 17.3). Regulations governing incidental
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. take permits for endangered and
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Karen Goebel, Assistant Field threatened species, respectively, are
Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife found in the Code of Federal
Fish and Wildlife Service
Office (see ADDRESSES); telephone: 760– Regulations at 50 CFR 17.22 and 50 CFR
[FWS–R8–ES–2017–N107; 431–9440. If you use a 17.32.
FXES11140800000–178–FF08ECAR00] telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD), please call the Federal Relay Applicant’s Proposed Project
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Service (FRS) at 800–877–8339. The applicant requests a 5-year permit
and Plants; Incidental Take Permit
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA. If
Application; Proposed Low-Effect
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), we approve the permit, the applicant
Habitat Conservation Plan for the
have received an application from anticipates taking gnatcatcher as a result
Coastal California Gnatcatcher and
Orange County Waste & Recycling of permanent impacts to 5.78 acres (ac)
Associated Documents; Brea,
(applicant) for a 5-year incidental take of coastal sage scrub habitat that the
California
permit for one covered species pursuant species uses for breeding, feeding, and
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered sheltering, as well as 2.85 ac of
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 nonnative grassland habitat that may
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request U.S.C. 1531 et seq.; ESA). The support gnatcatcher foraging and/or
for comments. application addresses the potential dispersal. The take would be incidental
‘‘take’’ of the threatened coastal to the applicant’s activities associated
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and California gnatcatcher (Polioptila with the construction of the Olinda
Wildlife Service, have received an californica californica; gnatcatcher) in Alpha Landfill projects in the City of
application from Orange County Waste the course of activities associated with Brea, California, and includes
& Recycling for a 5-year incidental take the construction, operation, and restoration and in-perpetuity
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:44 Nov 30, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM 01DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_57220/page/1.svg)
![56992 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 230 / Friday, December 1, 2017 / Notices
Authority handle controlled substances in the inconvenience, trauma and the lengthy
We provide this notice under section State of Maryland.’’ GX 1, at 1 (citing 21 process of reapplication of this same
10 of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) U.S.C. 802(21), 823(f)(1), and 824(a)(3)). license.’’ Id.
The Show Cause Order notified
and NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1506.6). By Order dated August 2, 2017, the
Respondent of his right to request a
Chief Administrative Law Judge
Scott A. Sobiech, hearing on the allegations or to submit
a written statement while waiving his terminated the proceedings based on
Acting Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish and
Wildlife Office, Carlsbad, California. right to a hearing, the procedures for Respondent’s ‘‘Order to Show Cause
electing each option, and the Waiver of Hearing and Statement on the
[FR Doc. 2017–25889 Filed 11–30–17; 8:45 am]
consequences for failing to elect either Matter.’’ GX 8, at 1 (Order Terminating
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
option. GX 1, at 2 (citing 21 CFR Proceedings).
1301.43). The Show Cause Order also On August 2, 2017, the Government
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE notified Respondent of the opportunity submitted a Request for Final Agency
to submit a corrective action plan. GX Action and an evidentiary record to
Drug Enforcement Administration 1, at 2 (citing 21 U.S.C. 824(c)(2)(C)). support the Show Cause Order’s
By letter dated July 17, 2017 allegation.
Kofi E. Shaw-Taylor, M.D. Decision and addressed to the Office of the [DEA]
Order Administrative Law Judges, I find that the Government’s service of
Respondent, by his counsel, requested a the Show Cause Order on Respondent
On June 12, 2017, the Assistant hearing. GX 5, at 1. The letter admitted was legally sufficient. I find that, by
Administrator, Diversion Control that the Maryland State Board of letter from his counsel dated July 17,
Division, Drug Enforcement Physicians issued an Order of Summary 2017, Respondent requested a hearing. I
Administration (hereinafter, DEA or Suspension of Respondent’s license to find that, by submission of his counsel
Government), issued an Order to Show practice medicine on May 9, 2017. Id. dated July 28, 2017, Respondent sought
Cause to Kofi E. Shaw-Taylor, M.D. According to the letter, Respondent was to file an ‘‘Order to Show Cause Waiver
(hereinafter, Respondent) of Baltimore, challenging that Order ‘‘on grounds of of Hearing and Statement on the
Maryland. GX 1. The Show Cause Order abuse of and lack of due process.’’ Id. Matter.’’ Respondent was entitled to
proposed the revocation of On July 24, 2017, the Chief waive his right to a hearing and to fail
Respondent’s Certificate of Registration Administrative Law Judge, John J. to follow up on his request for a hearing.
on the ground that Respondent does Mulrooney, II, ordered the Government See 21 CFR 1301.43(d). DEA
‘‘not have authority to handle controlled to file proof of service and evidence in regulations, however, limit the time for
substances in the State of Maryland,’’ support of its allegation that Respondent Respondent to exercise his right to
the State in which he is registered. GX lacked State authority to practice submit a written statement of position to
1, at 1 (citing 21 U.S.C. 823(f) and medicine. GX 6, at 1 (Order Directing ‘‘the period permitted for filing a
§ 824(a)(3)). the Filing of Proof of Service and request for a hearing or a notice of
As to the Agency’s jurisdiction, the Government Evidence of Lack of State appearance,’’ absent a showing of good
Show Cause Order alleged that Authority Allegation and Briefing
Respondent holds DEA Certificate of cause. 21 CFR 1301.43(c). Respondent’s
Schedule). The Order also established a ‘‘Statement on the Matter’’ was not filed
Registration No. AS2145476 which briefing schedule ‘‘if the Government
authorizes him to dispense controlled within the period specified in the
files a motion based on timeliness of the
substances in schedules II through V as regulation, and Respondent did not
hearing request and/or a motion for
a practitioner at the registered address make a showing of good cause to excuse
summary disposition based on its
of 4419 Falls Road, Suite C, Baltimore, the untimeliness. I decline, therefore, to
allegation that the Respondent lacks
Maryland 21211. GX 1, at 1. See also GX state authority to handle controlled consider any factual assertions or
2 (Controlled Substance Registration substances.’’ Id. at 1–2. arguments that Respondent raised in the
Certificate) (including ‘‘Westside By submission dated July 28, 2017, ‘‘Statement on the Matter.’’ 1 I issue this
Medical Group’’). The Show Cause Respondent, by his counsel, submitted Decision and Order based on the record
Order alleged that this registration an ‘‘Order to Show Cause Waiver of submitted by the Government and on
expires on February 29, 2020. GX 1, at Hearing and Statement on the Matter.’’ Respondent’s request for a hearing. 21
1. See also GX 2. GX 7. According to that submission, CFR 1301.43(e).
As the substantive ground for the Respondent’s counsel stated that Findings of Fact
proceeding, the Show Cause Order Respondent was served with the Show
alleged that Respondent is ‘‘without Cause Order on June 20, 2017. GX 7, at Respondent’s DEA Registration
authority to handle controlled 1. He also stated that Respondent was
substances in Maryland, the state in waiving a hearing on the Show Cause Respondent currently holds DEA
which . . . [he is] registered with the Order. Id. Further, the submission practitioner registration AS2145476
DEA.’’ GX 1, at 1. It further alleged that, admitted that the Maryland State Board authorizing him to dispense controlled
on May 9, 2017, Respondent’s of Physicians issued an Order of substances in schedules II through V at
‘‘authority to prescribe and administer Summary Suspension of Respondent’s the address of Westside Medical Group,
controlled substances in the State of license to practice medicine, 4419 Falls Road, Suite C, Baltimore,
Maryland was suspended.’’ GX 1, at 1. characterizing the Order as being ‘‘based Maryland 21211. GX 1, at 1; GX 2. This
See also GX 3 (Maryland State Board of on alleged but unproven charges.’’ Id. It registration expires on February 29,
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Physicians Order of Summary expressed ‘‘our fervent belief that the 2020. Id.
Suspension of License to Practice Respondent shall prevail in this matter
Medicine, hereinafter Order of and his Medical license reinstated.’’ Id. 1 Respondent’s ‘‘Statement on the Matter’’ did not
Summary Suspension). The Show Cause It asked that ‘‘the DEA suspend the claim that Respondent’s medical license had been
reinstated. To the contrary, it reiterated
Order alleged that ‘‘DEA must revoke revocation’’ of Respondent’s registration Respondent’s admission that the Maryland State
. . . [his] DEA . . . [registration] based ‘‘pending the restoration of the Medical Board of Physicians issued an Order of Summary
upon . . . [his] lack of authority to license to save the Respondent the Suspension of Respondent’s medical license.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:44 Nov 30, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM 01DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_57220/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-10-25 10:45:11
Document Modified: 2018-10-25 10:45:11
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice of availability; request for comments. | |
| Dates | Written comments should be received on or before January 2, 2018. | |
| Contact | Ms. Karen Goebel, Assistant Field | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 56990 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR