82 FR 57219 - Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 231 (December 4, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 231 (December 4, 2017)
| Page Range | 57219-57221 | |
| FR Document | 2017-26070 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 231 (Monday, December 4, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 57219-57221] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-26070] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482- 4735. Background Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), may request, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213, that the Department of Commerce (the Department) conduct an administrative review of that antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation. All deadlines for the submission of comments or actions by the Department discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from the applicable starting date. Respondent Selection In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to requests made for the orders identified below, the Department intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data for U.S. imports during the period of review. We intend to release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (APO) to all parties having an APO within five days of publication of the initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent selection within 21 days of publication of the initiation Federal Register notice. Therefore, we encourage all parties interested in commenting on respondent selection to submit their APO applications on the date of publication of the initiation notice, or as soon thereafter as possible. The Department invites comments regarding the CBP data and respondent selection within five days of placement of the CBP data on the record of the review. In the event the Department decides it is necessary to limit individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: In general, the Department finds that determinations concerning whether particular companies should be ``collapsed'' (i.e., treated as a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates) require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, the Department will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent selection phase of a review and will not collapse companies at the respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review, new shipper review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to a review, if the Department determined, or continued to treat, that company as collapsed with others, the Department will assume that such companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, the Department will not collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection. Parties are requested to (a) identify which companies subject to review previously were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding in which they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to complete a Quantity and Value Questionnaire for purposes of respondent selection, in general each company must report volume and value data separately for itself. Parties should not include data for any other party, even if they believe they should be treated as a single entity with that other party. If a company was collapsed with another company or companies in the most recently completed segment of a proceeding where the Department considered collapsing that entity, complete quantity and value data for that collapsed entity must be submitted. Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that requests a review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The regulation provides that the Department may extend this time if it is reasonable to do so. In order to provide parties additional certainty with respect to when the Department will exercise its discretion to extend this 90- day deadline, interested parties are advised that, with regard to reviews requested on the basis of anniversary months on or after December 2017, the Department does not intend to extend the 90-day deadline unless the requestor demonstrates that an extraordinary circumstance prevented it from submitting a timely withdrawal request. Determinations by the Department to extend the 90-day deadline will be made on a case-by-case basis. The Department is providing this notice on its Web site, as well as in its ``Opportunity to Request Administrative Review'' notices, so that interested parties will be aware of the manner in which the Department intends to exercise its discretion in the future. Opportunity to Request a Review: Not later than the last day of December [[Page 57220]] 2017,\1\ interested parties may request administrative review of the following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with anniversary dates in December for the following periods: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day when the Department is closed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Period of review ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Antidumping Duty Proceedings BRAZIL: Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings A-351- 12/1/16-11/30/17 602................................................ CHILE: Certain Preserved Mushrooms A-337-804........ 12/1/16-11/30/17 GERMANY: Non-Oriented Electrical Steel A-428-843.... 12/1/16-11/30/17 INDIA: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 A-533-838........... 12/1/16-11/30/17 Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products A- 12/1/16-11/30/17 533-820........................................ Commodity Matchbooks A-533-848.................. 12/1/16-11/30/17 Stainless Steel Wire Rod A-533-808.............. 12/1/16-11/30/17 INDONESIA: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat 12/1/16-11/30/17 Products A-560-812................................. JAPAN: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand A-588-068 12/1/16-11/30/17 Non-Oriented Electrical Steel A-588-857......... 12/1/16-11/30/17 Welded Large Diameter Line Pipe A-588-857....... 12/1/16-11/30/17 OMAN: Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe A- 6/8/16-12/4/16 523-812............................................ 12/16/16-11/30/17 PAKISTAN: Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe 6/8/16-11/30/17 A-553-903.......................................... REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Non-Oriented Electrical Steel A-580-872......... 12/1/16-11/30/17 Welded Astm A-312 Stainless Steel Pipe A-580-810 12/1/16-11/30/17 Uncovered Innersprings Units A-580-821.......... 12/1/16-11/30/17 Welded Line Pipe A-580-876...................... 12/1/16-11/30/17 RUSSIA: Certain Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon- 12/1/16-11/30/17 Quality Steel Products A-821-809................... SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM: Uncovered Innerspring 12/1/16-11/30/17 Units A-552-803.................................... SWEDEN: Non-Oriented Electrical Steel A-401-809..... 12/1/16-11/30/17 TAIWAN: Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings A-583-605.. 12/1/16-11/30/17 Non-Oriented Electrical Steel A-583-851......... 12/1/16-11/30/17 Steel Wire Garment Hangers A-583-849............ 12/1/16-11/30/17 Welded Astm A-312 Stainless Steel Pipe A-583-815 12/1/16-11/30/17 THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 A-570-892........... 12/1/16-11/30/17 Cased Pencils A-570-827......................... 12/1/16-11/30/17 Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether 12/1/16-11/30/17 orNot Assembled Into Modules A-570-979......... Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof A-570-891. 12/1/16-11/30/17 Honey A-570-863................................. 12/1/16-11/30/17 Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings A-570-881..... 12/1/16-11/30/17 Melamine A-570-020.............................. 12/1/16-11/30/17 Multilayered Wood Flooring A-570-970............ 12/1/16-11/30/17 Non-Oriented Electrical Steel A-570-996......... 12/1/16-11/30/17 Porcelain-On-Steel Cooking Ware A-570-020....... 12/1/16-11/30/17 Silicomanganese A-570-828....................... 12/1/16-11/30/17 TURKEY: Welded Line Pipe A-489-822.................. 12/1/16-11/30/17 UNITED ARAB EMIRATES: Circular Welded Carbon-Quality 6/8/16-11/30/17 Steel Pipe A-520-807............................... Countervailing Duty Proceedings CANADA: Supercalendered Paper C-122-854............. 1/1/16-12/31/16 INDIA: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 C-533-839........... 1/1/16-12/31/16 Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products C- 1/1/16-12/31/16 533-821........................................ Commodity Matchbooks C-533-849.................. 1/1/16-12/31/16 INDONESIA: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat 1/1/16-12/31/16 Products C-560-813................................. TAIWAN: Non-Oriented Electrical Steel C-583-852..... 1/1/16-12/31/16 THAILAND: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat 1/1/16-12/31/16 Products C-549-818................................. THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether 1/1/16-12/31/16 orNot Assembled Into Modules C-570-980......... Melamine C-570-021.............................. 1/1/16-12/31/16 Non-Oriented Electrical Steel C-570-997......... 1/1/16-12/31/16 Multilayered Wood Flooring C-570-971............ 1/1/16-12/31/16 TURKEY: Welded Line Pipe C-489-823.................. 1/1/16-12/31/16 Suspension Agreements MEXICO: Sugar A-201-845................................. 12/1/16-11/30/17 Sugar C-201-846................................. 1/1/17-12/30/17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [[Page 57221]] In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), an interested party as defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and countervailing duty reviews, the interested party must specify the individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or an antidumping or countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for which it is requesting a review. In addition, a domestic interested party or an interested party described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular producers or exporters. If the interested party intends for the Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which was produced in more than one country of origin and each country of origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the request is intended to cover. Note that, for any party the Department was unable to locate in prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an administrative review of that party absent new information as to the party's location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to determine if the interested party's attempts were reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii). As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non- Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), the Department clarified its practice with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties on imports of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The public should be aware of this clarification in determining whether to request an administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping findings and orders.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department no longer considers the non-market economy (NME) entity as an exporter conditionally subject to an antidumping duty administrative reviews.\3\ Accordingly, the NME entity will not be under review unless the Department specifically receives a request for, or self-initiates, a review of the NME entity.\4\ In administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders on merchandise from NME countries where a review of the NME entity has not been initiated, but where an individual exporter for which a review was initiated does not qualify for a separate rate, the Department will issue a final decision indicating that the company in question is part of the NME entity. However, in that situation, because no review of the NME entity was conducted, the NME entity's entries were not subject to the review and the rate for the NME entity is not subject to change as a result of that review (although the rate for the individual exporter may change as a function of the finding that the exporter is part of the NME entity). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). \4\ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties should specify that they are requesting a review of entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to the extent possible, include the names of such exporters in their request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Following initiation of an antidumping administrative review when there is no review requested of the NME entity, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all exporters not named in the initiation notice, including those that were suspended at the NME entity rate. All requests must be filed electronically in Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) on Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS Web site at http://access.trade.gov.\5\ Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request must be served on the petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department will publish in the Federal Register a notice of ``Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation'' for requests received by the last day of December 2017. If the Department does not receive, by the last day of December 2017, a request for review of entries covered by an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice and for the period identified above, the Department will instruct CBP to assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or bond for) estimated antidumping or countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to collect the cash deposit previously ordered. For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ``gap'' period of the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review. This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: November 28, 2017. James Maeder, Senior Director, performing the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2017-26070 Filed 12-1-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 231 / Monday, December 4, 2017 / Notices 57219
tempering, painting, varnishing, trimming, defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff review, if the Department determined,
cutting, punching, and/or slitting, or any Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), may or continued to treat, that company as
other processing that would not otherwise request, in accordance with 19 CFR collapsed with others, the Department
remove the merchandise from the scope of
351.213, that the Department of will assume that such companies
the investigations if performed in the country
of manufacture of the common alloy sheet. Commerce (the Department) conduct an continue to operate in the same manner
Excluded from the scope of these administrative review of that and will collapse them for respondent
investigations is aluminum can stock, which antidumping or countervailing duty selection purposes. Otherwise, the
is suitable for use in the manufacture of order, finding, or suspended Department will not collapse companies
aluminum beverage cans, lids of such cans, investigation.
or tabs used to open such cans. Aluminum for purposes of respondent selection.
All deadlines for the submission of
can stock is produced to gauges that range Parties are requested to (a) identify
comments or actions by the Department
from 0.200 mm to 0.292 mm, and has an H– discussed below refer to the number of which companies subject to review
19, H–41, H–48, or H–391 temper. In previously were collapsed, and (b)
addition, aluminum can stock has a lubricant
calendar days from the applicable
starting date. provide a citation to the proceeding in
applied to the flat surfaces of the can stock which they were collapsed. Further, if
to facilitate its movement through machines Respondent Selection
used in the manufacture of beverage cans. companies are requested to complete a
Aluminum can stock is properly classified In the event the Department limits the Quantity and Value Questionnaire for
under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the number of respondents for individual purposes of respondent selection, in
United States (HTSUS) subheadings examination for administrative reviews general each company must report
7606.12.3045 and 7606.12.3055. initiated pursuant to requests made for volume and value data separately for
Where the nominal and actual the orders identified below, the itself. Parties should not include data
measurements vary, a product is within the Department intends to select
scope if application of either the nominal or for any other party, even if they believe
respondents based on U.S. Customs and they should be treated as a single entity
actual measurement would place it within
the scope based on the definitions set for the Border Protection (CBP) data for U.S. with that other party. If a company was
above. imports during the period of review. We collapsed with another company or
Common alloy sheet is currently intend to release the CBP data under
companies in the most recently
classifiable under HTSUS subheadings Administrative Protective Order (APO)
completed segment of a proceeding
7606.11.3060, 7606.11.6000, 7606.12.3090, to all parties having an APO within five
7606.12.6000, 7606.91.3090, 7606.91.6080, days of publication of the initiation where the Department considered
7606.92.3090, and 7606.92.6080. Further, notice and to make our decision collapsing that entity, complete quantity
merchandise that falls within the scope of regarding respondent selection within and value data for that collapsed entity
these investigations may also be entered into must be submitted.
21 days of publication of the initiation
the United States under HTSUS subheadings
7606.11.3030, 7606.12.3030, 7606.91.3060, Federal Register notice. Therefore, we Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for
7606.91.6040, 7606.92.3060, 7606.92.6040, encourage all parties interested in Administrative Review
7607.11.9090. Although the HTSUS commenting on respondent selection to
subheadings are provided for convenience submit their APO applications on the Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a
and customs purposes, the written date of publication of the initiation party that requests a review may
description of the scope of these notice, or as soon thereafter as possible. withdraw that request within 90 days of
investigations is dispositive. The Department invites comments the date of publication of the notice of
[FR Doc. 2017–26068 Filed 12–1–17; 8:45 am] regarding the CBP data and respondent initiation of the requested review. The
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P selection within five days of placement regulation provides that the Department
of the CBP data on the record of the may extend this time if it is reasonable
review. to do so. In order to provide parties
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE In the event the Department decides
additional certainty with respect to
it is necessary to limit individual
International Trade Administration when the Department will exercise its
examination of respondents and
discretion to extend this 90-day
conduct respondent selection under
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty deadline, interested parties are advised
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
Order, Finding, or Suspended In general, the Department finds that that, with regard to reviews requested
Investigation; Opportunity To Request determinations concerning whether on the basis of anniversary months on
Administrative Review particular companies should be or after December 2017, the Department
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single does not intend to extend the 90-day
International Trade Administration, entity for purposes of calculating deadline unless the requestor
Department of Commerce. antidumping duty rates) require a demonstrates that an extraordinary
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: substantial amount of detailed circumstance prevented it from
Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD information and analysis, which often submitting a timely withdrawal request.
Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, require follow-up questions and Determinations by the Department to
Enforcement and Compliance, analysis. Accordingly, the Department extend the 90-day deadline will be
International Trade Administration, will not conduct collapsing analyses at made on a case-by-case basis.
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 the respondent selection phase of a The Department is providing this
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, review and will not collapse companies notice on its Web site, as well as in its
at the respondent selection phase unless
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4735. ‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative
there has been a determination to Review’’ notices, so that interested
Background collapse certain companies in a parties will be aware of the manner in
Each year during the anniversary previous segment of this antidumping which the Department intends to
month of the publication of an proceeding (i.e., investigation, exercise its discretion in the future.
antidumping or countervailing duty administrative review, new shipper
order, finding, or suspended review or changed circumstances Opportunity to Request a Review: Not
investigation, an interested party, as review). For any company subject to a later than the last day of December
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:22 Dec 01, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM 04DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_57450/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 231 / Monday, December 4, 2017 / Notices 57221
In accordance with 19 CFR as an exporter conditionally subject to review of entries covered by an order,
351.213(b), an interested party as an antidumping duty administrative finding, or suspended investigation
defined by section 771(9) of the Act may reviews.3 Accordingly, the NME entity listed in this notice and for the period
request in writing that the Secretary will not be under review unless the identified above, the Department will
conduct an administrative review. For Department specifically receives a instruct CBP to assess antidumping or
both antidumping and countervailing request for, or self-initiates, a review of countervailing duties on those entries at
duty reviews, the interested party must the NME entity.4 In administrative a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or
specify the individual producers or reviews of antidumping duty orders on bond for) estimated antidumping or
exporters covered by an antidumping merchandise from NME countries where countervailing duties required on those
finding or an antidumping or a review of the NME entity has not been entries at the time of entry, or
countervailing duty order or suspension initiated, but where an individual withdrawal from warehouse, for
agreement for which it is requesting a exporter for which a review was consumption and to continue to collect
review. In addition, a domestic initiated does not qualify for a separate the cash deposit previously ordered.
interested party or an interested party rate, the Department will issue a final For the first administrative review of
described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act decision indicating that the company in any order, there will be no assessment
must state why it desires the Secretary question is part of the NME entity. of antidumping or countervailing duties
to review those particular producers or However, in that situation, because no on entries of subject merchandise
exporters. If the interested party intends review of the NME entity was entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for the Secretary to review sales of conducted, the NME entity’s entries for consumption during the relevant
merchandise by an exporter (or a were not subject to the review and the provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of
producer if that producer also exports rate for the NME entity is not subject to the order, if such a gap period is
merchandise from other suppliers) change as a result of that review applicable to the period of review.
which was produced in more than one (although the rate for the individual This notice is not required by statute
country of origin and each country of exporter may change as a function of the but is published as a service to the
origin is subject to a separate order, then finding that the exporter is part of the international trading community.
the interested party must state NME entity). Dated: November 28, 2017.
specifically, on an order-by-order basis, Following initiation of an James Maeder,
which exporter(s) the request is antidumping administrative review Senior Director, performing the duties of
intended to cover. when there is no review requested of the Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Antidumping
Note that, for any party the NME entity, the Department will and Countervailing Duty Operations.
Department was unable to locate in instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all [FR Doc. 2017–26070 Filed 12–1–17; 8:45 am]
prior segments, the Department will not exporters not named in the initiation BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
accept a request for an administrative notice, including those that were
review of that party absent new suspended at the NME entity rate.
information as to the party’s location. All requests must be filed DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Moreover, if the interested party who electronically in Enforcement and
files a request for review is unable to Compliance’s Antidumping and International Trade Administration
locate the producer or exporter for Countervailing Duty Centralized
which it requested the review, the [A–560–826]
Electronic Service System (ACCESS) on
interested party must provide an Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS Monosodium Glutamate From
explanation of the attempts it made to Web site at http://access.trade.gov.5 Indonesia: Preliminary Results of
locate the producer or exporter at the Further, in accordance with 19 CFR Antidumping Duty Administrative
same time it files its request for review, 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request Review; 2015–2016
in order for the Secretary to determine must be served on the petitioner and
if the interested party’s attempts were each exporter or producer specified in AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR the request. International Trade Administration,
351.303(f)(3)(ii). The Department will publish in the U.S. Department of Commerce.
As explained in Antidumping and Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: of Administrative Review of (the Department) is conducting an
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 Antidumping or Countervailing Duty administrative review of the
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non- Order, Finding, or Suspended antidumping duty order on
Market Economy Antidumping Investigation’’ for requests received by monosodium glutamate (MSG) from
Proceedings: Assessment of the last day of December 2017. If the Indonesia. The period of review (POR)
Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 Department does not receive, by the last is November 1, 2015 through October
(October 24, 2011), the Department day of December 2017, a request for 31, 2016. The review covers a single
clarified its practice with respect to the mandatory respondent, PT Cheil Jedang
collection of final antidumping duties 3 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement Indonesia (CJI). The Department
on imports of merchandise where of Change in Department Practice for Respondent preliminarily determines that the
intermediate firms are involved. The Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
respondent has not made sales of
public should be aware of this Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 subject merchandise below normal
clarification in determining whether to FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). value (NV). We invite interested parties
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
request an administrative review of 4 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties
to comment on these preliminary
merchandise subject to antidumping should specify that they are requesting a review of results.
findings and orders.2 entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to
The Department no longer considers the extent possible, include the names of such DATES: Applicable December 4, 2017.
exporters in their request. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
the non-market economy (NME) entity 5 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
Caitlin Monks or Joseph Traw, AD/CVD
2 See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and
site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. 39263 (July 6, 2011). Compliance, International Trade
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:22 Dec 01, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM 04DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_57450/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-12-02 00:40:56
Document Modified: 2017-12-02 00:40:56
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482- 4735. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 57219 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR