82 FR 57715 - Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated Flat-Rolled Steel Products From Japan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 234 (December 7, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 234 (December 7, 2017)
| Page Range | 57715-57717 | |
| FR Document | 2017-26380 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 234 (Thursday, December 7, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 57715-57717] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-26380] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-588-869] Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated Flat-Rolled Steel Products From Japan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015- 2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On June 6, 2017, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on diffusion- annealed, nickel-plated flat-rolled steel products (nickel-plated, flat-rolled steel) from Japan. The review covers two producers/ exporters of the subject merchandise, Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd (Toyo Kohan) and Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metals Corporation (NSSMC). The period of review (POR) is May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016. As a result of our analysis of the comments and information received, these final results differ from the preliminary results of review. For the final weighted- average dumping margin, see the ``Final Results of Review'' section, below. Further, we continue to find that NSSMC had no reviewable shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. DATES: Applicable December 7, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Heeren, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-9179. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 6, 2017, the Department published the Preliminary Results.\1\ A summary of the events that occurred since the Department published these results, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for these final results, may be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated Flat-Rolled Steel Products from Japan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016, 82 FR 26046 (June 6, 2017) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. \2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated Flat-Rolled Steel Products from Japan; 2015-2016,'' dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The diffusion-annealed, nickel-plated flat-rolled steel products included in this order are flat-rolled, cold-reduced steel products, regardless of chemistry; whether or not in coils; either plated or coated with nickel or nickel-based alloys and subsequently annealed (i.e., ``diffusion-annealed''); whether or not painted, varnished or coated with plastics or other metallic or nonmetallic substances; and less than or equal to 2.0 mm in nominal thickness. For purposes of this order, ``nickel-based alloys'' include all nickel alloys with other metals in which nickel accounts for at least 80 percent of the alloy by volume. Imports of merchandise included in the scope of this order are classified primarily under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 7212.50.0000 and 7210.90.6000, but may also be classified under HTSUS subheadings [[Page 57716]] 7210.70.6090, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7219.90.0020, 7219.90.0025, 7219.90.0060, 7219.90.0080, 7220.90.0010, 7220.90.0015, 7225.99.0090, or 7226.99.0180. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive. Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, the Department determined that NSSMC had no shipments during the POR.\3\ Following publication of the Preliminary Results, we received no comments from interested parties regarding this determination. As a result, and because the record contains no evidence to the contrary, we find that NSSMC made no shipments during the POR. Accordingly, consistent with the Department's practice, we intend to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by NSSMC, but exported by other parties without their own rate, at the all-others rate.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 26047, and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 2-3. \4\ See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989, 56990 (September 17, 2010). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised by parties is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our review of the record and comments received from interested parties, we made certain changes to the margin calculations for Toyo Kohan. For a discussion of these changes, see Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Results of the Review The final weighted-average dumping margins are as follows for the period May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Producer or exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd........................................ 1.59 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure We will disclose the calculations performed to parties in this proceeding within five days of the date of publication of this notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Duty Assessment The Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.212(b). For Toyo Kohan, because its weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the Department has calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates. We calculated importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty rates by aggregating the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales and dividing each of these amounts by the total entered value associated with those sales. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review where an importer-specific assessment is above de minimis. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to antidumping duties any entries for which the importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis. As noted in the ``Final Determinaton of No Shipments'' section, above, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by NSSMC but exported by other parties, at the rate for the intermediate reseller, if available, or at the all- others rate.\5\ We intend to issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of this notice for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of these final results, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Toyo Kohan will be the rate established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 45.42 percent, the all- others rate established in the antidumping investigation.\6\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated Flat-Rolled Steel Products from Japan: Antidumping Duty Order, 79 FR 30816, 30817 (May 29, 2014) (Order). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the period of review. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties did occur and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written [[Page 57717]] notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: December 1, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. List of Issues III. Background IV. Scope of the Order V. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Classification of EP Sales as CEP Sales Comment 2: Using Lower of Cost Method or Market Rule for Overrun Production Costs Comment 3: The Department Should Correct Certain Clerical Errors in its Preliminary Results VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-26380 Filed 12-6-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2017 / Notices 57715
analysis required by the Court and the Results with respect to the dumping (NSSMC). The period of review (POR) is
specific facts of this case.6 margins calculated for Xinboda and May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016. As
On July 7, 2016, the CIT again Golden Bird. Based on the Second a result of our analysis of the comments
remanded the Department’s selection of Remand Results, as affirmed by the CIT, and information received, these final
the Philippines as a surrogate country.7 the revised dumping margin for results differ from the preliminary
Per the Court’s instructions, the Xinboda, from November 1, 2011, results of review. For the final weighted-
Department reconsidered its surrogate through October 31, 2012, is $2.19 per average dumping margin, see the ‘‘Final
country selection and, under protest, kilogram. The separate AFA rate for Results of Review’’ section, below.
selected Ukraine as the primary Golden Bird from November 1, 2011, Further, we continue to find that
surrogate country.8 The calculations through October 31, 2012, is $2.76 per NSSMC had no reviewable shipments of
performed with the new surrogate kilogram. subject merchandise during the POR.
values resulted in a weighted-average Because the CIT’s ruling was not DATES: Applicable December 7, 2017.
dumping margin of $2.19 per kilogram appealed, it represents a final and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
for Xinboda. Since the Department conclusive court decision, and Madeline Heeren, AD/CVD Operations,
recalculated a margin for Xinboda with accordingly the Department will Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance,
a new surrogate country and new instruct Customs and Border Protection International Trade Administration,
surrogate values, we updated Golden (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Bird’s separate AFA rate to reflect unliquidated entries of subject Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
Xinboda’s highest-transaction specific merchandise based on the revised DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–9179.
margin using the new surrogate values. dumping margins summarized above. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Accordingly, Golden Bird was assigned
an updated AFA rate of $2.76 per Cash Deposit Requirements Background
kilogram. The Department will not update the On June 6, 2017, the Department
On September 19, 2017, the CIT cash deposit requirements for Golden published the Preliminary Results.1 A
sustained the Department’s Second Bird and Xinboda as they each have summary of the events that occurred
Remand Results with respect to the later-determined rates from subsequent since the Department published these
eighteenth administrative review of the administrative reviews. results, as well as a full discussion of
AD order on fresh garlic from China.9 the issues raised by parties for these
Notification to Interested Parties
Timken Notice final results, may be found in the Issues
This notice is issued and published in
In its decision in Timken,10 as and Decision Memorandum, which is
accordance with sections 516A(e)(1),
clarified by Diamond Sawblades,11 the hereby adopted by this notice.2
751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Dated: December 4, 2017. Scope of the Order
held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of Gary Taverman, The diffusion-annealed, nickel-plated
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the flat-rolled steel products included in
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
Act), the Department must publish a and Countervailing Duty Operations, this order are flat-rolled, cold-reduced
notice of a court decision that is not ‘‘in performing the non-exclusive functions and steel products, regardless of chemistry;
harmony’’ with a Department duties of the Assistant Secretary for whether or not in coils; either plated or
determination and must suspend Enforcement and Compliance. coated with nickel or nickel-based
liquidation of entries pending a [FR Doc. 2017–26384 Filed 12–6–17; 8:45 am] alloys and subsequently annealed (i.e.,
‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P ‘‘diffusion-annealed’’); whether or not
September 19, 2017, final judgment painted, varnished or coated with
sustaining the Second Remand Results plastics or other metallic or nonmetallic
constitutes a final decision of the Court DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE substances; and less than or equal to 2.0
that is not in harmony with the mm in nominal thickness. For purposes
Department’s Final Results.12 This International Trade Administration
of this order, ‘‘nickel-based alloys’’
notice is published in fulfillment of the [A–588–869] include all nickel alloys with other
Timken publication requirements. metals in which nickel accounts for at
Amended Final Results Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated Flat- least 80 percent of the alloy by volume.
Rolled Steel Products From Japan: Imports of merchandise included in
Because there is now a final court Final Results of Antidumping Duty the scope of this order are classified
decision, we are amending the Final Administrative Review; 2015–2016 primarily under Harmonized Tariff
6 Id. at 6–11. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
7 See Fresh Garlic Producers Association v. International Trade Administration, subheadings 7212.50.0000 and
United States, 180 F. Supp. 3d 1233 (CIT 2016). Department of Commerce. 7210.90.6000, but may also be classified
8 See Memorandum to The File, ‘‘Final Results of under HTSUS subheadings
SUMMARY: On June 6, 2017, the
Redetermination Pursuant to Remand: Fresh Garlic
from the People’s Republic of China, Fresh Garlic Department of Commerce (the 1 See Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated Flat-
Producers Association, et al., v. United States, U.S. Department) published in the Federal Rolled Steel Products from Japan: Preliminary
Court of International Trade, Consol. Ct. No. 14– Register the preliminary results of the Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
00180, Slip Op. 16–68,’’ (January 10, 2017) (Second
Remand Results).
administrative review of the Review, Preliminary Determination of No
antidumping duty order on diffusion- Shipments; 2015–2016, 82 FR 26046 (June 6, 2017)
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
9 See Fresh Garlic Producers Association v.
(Preliminary Results) and accompanying
United States, CIT Slip Op. 17–127, Consol. Ct. No. annealed, nickel-plated flat-rolled steel Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
14–00180 (September 19, 2017) (Slip Op. 17–127). products (nickel-plated, flat-rolled steel) 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
10 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337,
from Japan. The review covers two Memorandum for the Final Results of the
341 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken). Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
11 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
producers/exporters of the subject
Order on Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated Flat-
United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) merchandise, Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd Rolled Steel Products from Japan; 2015–2016,’’
(Diamond Sawblades). (Toyo Kohan) and Nippon Steel & dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this
12 See Final Results. Sumitomo Metals Corporation notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:50 Dec 06, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM 07DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_57949/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2017 / Notices 57717
notification of the return/destruction of antidumping duty administrative collect information from which to
APO materials, or conversion to judicial review, and that the Department has calculate a reliable separate rate, or if it
protective order, is hereby requested. assigned Xinboda and other non- results in a non-punitive rate for
Failure to comply with the regulations examined separate rate companies separate respondents, adjusting the
and the terms of an APO is a Jinxiang Richfar Fruits & Vegetables Co, separate rate assigned based on the
sanctionable violation. Ltd. (Jinxiang Richfar); Qingdao Lianghe results of remand pursuant to {Fresh
We are issuing and publishing this International Trade Co., Ltd. (Qingdao Garlic Producers Association v. United
notice in accordance with sections Lianghe); Shandong Chenhe States, 180 F. Supp. 3d 1233 (CIT 2016),
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 International Trading Co., Ltd. arising out of the eighteenth
CFR 351.213(h). (Shandong Chenhe); and Weifang administrative review of the AD order
Dated: December 1, 2017. Hongqiao International Logistics Co., on fresh garlic from the PRC (FGPA
Gary Taverman, Ltd. (Weifang Hongqiao) a dumping II)}.’’ 5
margin of $2.19 per kilogram. On April 28, 2017, the Department
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
DATES: Applicable September 29, 2017. filed the Final Remand Results,
and Countervailing Duty Operations
performing the non-exclusive functions and continuing to find Golden Bird
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
duties of the Assistant Secretary for ineligible for a separate rate.6 For non-
Chien-Min Yang, AD/CVD Operations,
Enforcement and Compliance. examined separate companies, the
Office VII, Enforcement and
Department determined that it would
Appendix I Compliance, International Trade
establish their rate by applying the
Administration, U.S. Department of
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and updated separate rate determined in the
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
Decision Memorandum remand of the 18th administrative
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
I. Summary review, pursuant to FGPA II.7
(202) 482–5484. On July 17, 2017, the CIT sustained
II. List of Issues
III. Background SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the Department’s Final Remand Results
IV. Scope of the Order Background as to Golden Bird.8 On September 19,
V. Discussion of the Issues 2017, the CIT sustained the
Comment 1: Classification of EP Sales as On June 15, 2015, the Department Department’s Final Remand Results as
CEP Sales published the Final Results pertaining to the separate rate applied to non-
Comment 2: Using Lower of Cost Method to mandatory respondents Golden Bird examined companies.9 Thus, the
or Market Rule for Overrun Production and Jinxiang Hejia Co., Ltd. (Hejia),
Costs calculations performed with the new
along with other exporters, including surrogate values resulted in a weighted-
Comment 3: The Department Should non-examined separate rate companies
Correct Certain Clerical Errors in its average dumping margin of $2.19 per
Preliminary Results
Xinboda, Jinxiang Richfar, Qingdao kilogram and was assigned to Xinboda,
VI. Recommendation Lianghe, Shandong Chenhe, and Jinxiang Richfar, Qingdao Lianghe,
Weifang Hongqiao.1 The period of Shandong Chenhe, and Weifang
[FR Doc. 2017–26380 Filed 12–6–17; 8:45 am]
review (POR) is November 1, 2012, Hongqiao.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P through October 31, 2013. In the Final
Results, the Department relied on total Timken Notice
adverse facts available (AFA) with In its decision in Timken,10 as
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
respect to Golden Bird and Hejia, and clarified by Diamond Sawblades,11 the
International Trade Administration found Golden Bird and Hejia to be part Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
of the PRC-wide entity.2 The held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of
[A–570–831] Department assigned a rate of $1.82 per the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
kilogram for Xinboda and the other non- Act), the Department must publish a
Fresh Garlic From the People’s
examined separate rate companies.3 notice of a court decision that is not ‘‘in
Republic of China: Notice of Court On July 27, 2016, the CIT remanded
Decision Not in Harmony With Final harmony’’ with a Department
for the Department to consider evidence determination and must suspend
Results of Administrative Review and on the record concerning Golden Bird’s
Notice of Amended Final Results liquidation of entries pending a
independence from government control ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, to determine whether the company is September 19, 2017, final judgment
International Trade Administration, entitled to separate rate status.4 The sustaining the Final Remand Results
Department of Commerce. Court ordered the Department to select
SUMMARY: On September 19, 2017, the a separate rate for the non-examined 5 Id. at 30–31.
United States Court of International companies ‘‘by either employing a 6 See Memorandum to The File, ‘‘Final Results of
Trade (the CIT) entered final judgment different reasonable method to calculate Redetermination Pursuant to Remand: Fresh Garlic
sustaining the Department of the separate rate, such as reopening the from the People’s Republic of China, Shenzhen
Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd., et al. v. United States,
Commerce’s (the Department) remand record to examine new mandatory U.S. Court of International Trade, Consol. Ct. No.
results pertaining to 19th antidumping respondents, reopening the record to 15–00179, Slip Op. 16–74’’ (April 28, 2016).
duty administrative review of the 7 Id.
antidumping duty order on fresh garlic 1 See Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of 8 See Hebei Golden Bird Trading Co., Ltd., et al.,
from the People’s Republic of China China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of the v. United States, CIT Slip Op. 17–86, Ct. No. 15–
19th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 00182 (July 17, 2017).
(PRC) for Hebei Golden Trading Co.,
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
2012–2013, 80 FR 34141 (June 15, 2015) (Final 9 See Fresh Garlic Producers Association, et al.,
Ltd. (Golden Bird) and Shenzhen Results), and accompanying Issues and Decision v. United States, CIT Slip Op. 17–127, Consol. Ct.
Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd. (Xinboda), Memorandum (IDM). No. 14–00180 (September 19, 2017) (Slip Op. 17–
2 See IDM. 127).
and certain non-examined separate rate
3 Id. 10 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337,
companies. The Department is notifying 4 See Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd., et 341 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken).
the public that the final judgment in this al., v. United States, CIT Slip Op. 16–74, Consol. 11 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
case is not in harmony with the final Ct. No. 15–00179 (July 27, 2016) (Garlic 19 United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
results and partial rescission of the 19th Remand) at 30. (Diamond Sawblades).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:50 Dec 06, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM 07DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_57949/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-12-07 00:34:38
Document Modified: 2017-12-07 00:34:38
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable December 7, 2017. | |
| Contact | Madeline Heeren, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-9179. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 57715 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR