82_FR_57952 82 FR 57718 - Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results, Preliminary Rescission, and Final Rescission, in Part, of the 22nd Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Results of the New Shipper Reviews; 2015-2016

82 FR 57718 - Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results, Preliminary Rescission, and Final Rescission, in Part, of the 22nd Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Results of the New Shipper Reviews; 2015-2016

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 234 (December 7, 2017)

Page Range57718-57721
FR Document2017-26378

The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting the 22nd administrative review of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from the People's Republic of China (PRC) and two concurrent new shipper reviews. The period of review (POR) for the administrative and new shipper reviews is November 1, 2015, through October 31, 2016. The Department preliminarily determines that mandatory respondent, Shandong Jinxiang Zhengyang Import & Export Co., Ltd. (Zhengyang) sold subject merchandise to the United States at less than normal value (NV). We also preliminarily find that the review request made by the Coalition for Fair Trade in Garlic (the CFTG) was not valid, and accordingly have preliminarily rescinded the review with respect to seven companies, including the other mandatory respondent, Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co., Ltd. (Harmoni). The Department also preliminarily determines that the new shipper reviews respondents, Qingdao Joinseafoods Co., Ltd. and Join Food Ingredient Inc. (collectively, Join) and Zhengzhou Yudi Shengjin Agricultural Trade Co., Ltd. (Yudi), each made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 234 (Thursday, December 7, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 234 (Thursday, December 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57718-57721]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26378]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-831]


Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary 
Results, Preliminary Rescission, and Final Rescission, in Part, of the 
22nd Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Results of 
the New Shipper Reviews; 2015-2016

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting the 
22nd administrative review of the antidumping duty order on fresh 
garlic from the People's Republic of China (PRC) and two concurrent new 
shipper reviews. The period of review (POR) for the administrative and 
new shipper reviews is November 1, 2015, through October 31, 2016. The 
Department preliminarily determines that mandatory respondent, Shandong 
Jinxiang Zhengyang Import & Export Co., Ltd. (Zhengyang) sold subject 
merchandise to the United States at less than normal value (NV). We 
also preliminarily find that the review request made by the Coalition 
for Fair Trade in Garlic (the CFTG) was not valid, and accordingly have 
preliminarily rescinded the review with respect to seven companies, 
including the other mandatory respondent, Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co., 
Ltd. (Harmoni). The Department also preliminarily determines that the 
new shipper reviews respondents, Qingdao Joinseafoods Co., Ltd. and 
Join Food Ingredient Inc. (collectively, Join) and Zhengzhou Yudi 
Shengjin Agricultural Trade Co., Ltd. (Yudi), each made sales of 
subject merchandise at less than normal value. We invite interested 
parties to comment on these preliminary results.

DATES: Applicable December 7, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathryn Wallace or Alexander Cipolla, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
6251 or (202) 482-4956.

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the order includes all grades of garlic, 
whole or separated into constituent cloves. Fresh garlic that are 
subject to the order are currently classified under the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 0703.20.0010, 
0703.20.0020, and 0703.20.0090. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided 
for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description 
remains dispositive. For a full description of the scope of this order, 
please see ``Scope of the Order'' in the accompanying Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary 
Results, Preliminary Rescission, and Final Rescission, In Part, of 
the 2015-2016 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary 
Results of the New Shipper Reviews: Fresh Garlic from the People's 
Republic of China'' (November 30, 2017) (Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Partial Rescission of Administrative Review

    On January 13, 2017, the Department initiated a review of 35 
companies in this administrative review.\2\ On April 13, 2017, review 
requests were timely withdrawn for six companies.\3\ In addition, as 
discussed in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, one of 
the companies for which the review request was timely rescinded is a 
part of the QTF-Entity, which submitted a separate rate application. 
Accordingly, this company remains subject to review. Moreover, the 
Department inadvertently initiated a review of one company without a 
request. The Department is, therefore, partially rescinding this 
administrative review with respect to the companies listed in Appendix 
I, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 4294 (January 13, 2017) (Initiation 
Notice). For a list of the 35 companies, see 82 FR 4296-4297.
    \3\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``22nd Administrative Review of the 
Antidumping Duty Order on Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of 
China--Petitioners' Withdrawal of Certain Requests for 
Administrative Review,'' (April 13, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Rescission of Administrative Review

    In addition, as discussed in depth at ``Preliminary Rescission of 
Administrative Review'' in the accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum, the Department has preliminarily determined that the review 
request from the CFTG was invalid, and is preliminarily rescinding the 
administrative review with respect to the companies listed in Appendix 
II.

Methodology

    The Department is conducting these reviews in accordance with 
section 751(a)(1)(B) and 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.214. Export prices were

[[Page 57719]]

calculated in accordance with section 772(a) of the Act; constructed 
export prices were calculated in accordance with section 772(b) of the 
Act. Because the PRC is a non-market economy (NME) within the meaning 
of section 771(18) of the Act, NV has been calculated in accordance 
with section 773(c) of the Act.
    For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which is hereby 
adopted by this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public 
document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central 
Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. 
In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 
can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum 
and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are 
identical in content.

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments

    As discussed at ``Preliminary Determination of No Shipments'' in 
the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum, 14 companies timely 
filed ``no shipment'' certifications stating that they had no entries 
into the United States of subject merchandise during the POR. However, 
no review requests were submitted for five of these companies. 
Moreover, review requests were timely withdrawn for two of these 
companies. In addition, two of these companies are a part of the QTF-
entity, which filed a separate rate certification, as discussed at 
``Separate Rate Status of the QTF-Entity'' in the accompanying Issues 
and Decision Memorandum.
    Accordingly, the Department, consistent with its practice, 
requested that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) conduct a query 
of potential shipments made by the remaining five companies. Based on 
the certifications by the remaining companies and our analysis of CBP 
information, we preliminarily determine that the companies listed in 
Appendix IV did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR. In 
addition, the Department finds that consistent with its refinement to 
its assessment practice in NME cases, further discussed below, it is 
appropriate not to preliminarily rescind the administrative review, in 
part, in these circumstances, but rather to complete the administrative 
review with respect to these five companies, and issue appropriate 
instructions to CBP based on the final results of the administrative 
review.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011); see 
also ``Assessment Rates'' section below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Verification

    As provided in section 782(i) of the Act, we intend to verify the 
information provided by respondents using standard verification 
procedures, including on-site inspection of the producer's and 
exporter's facilities, and examination of relevant sales and financial 
records. Our verification results will be outlined in the verification 
report for the respective respondents after completion of the 
verification.

Preliminary Determination of Separate Rates for Non-Selected Companies

    In accordance with section 777A(c)(2)(B) of the Act, the Department 
employed a limited examination methodology, as it determined that it 
would not be practicable to examine individually all companies for 
which a review request was made.\5\ There were six exporters of subject 
merchandise from the PRC that have demonstrated their eligibility for a 
separate rate but were not selected for individual examination in this 
review. These six exporters are listed in Appendix III.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Administrative Review of the Antidumping 
Duty Order on Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China: 
Respondent Selection Memorandum,'' dated March 7, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Neither the Act nor the Department's regulations address the 
establishment of the rate applied to individual companies not selected 
for examination where the Department limited its examination in an 
administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. The 
Department's practice in cases involving limited selection based on 
exporters accounting for the largest volume of imports has been to look 
to section 735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, which provides 
instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an investigation. 
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act instructs the Department to use rates 
established for individually investigated producers and exporters, 
excluding any rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on 
facts available in investigations. In the administrative review, 
Zhengyang is the only reviewed respondent that received a weighted-
average margin. Therefore, for the preliminary results, the Department 
has preliminarily determined to assign Zhengyang's margin to the non-
selected separate-rate companies.

PRC-Wide Entity

    The Department's policy regarding conditional review of the PRC-
wide entity applies to this administrative review.\6\ Under this 
policy, the PRC-wide entity will not be under review unless a party 
specifically requests, or the Department self-initiates, a review of 
the entity. Because no party requested, and the Department did not 
self-initiate, a review of the PRC-wide entity for this POR, the entity 
is not under review and the entity's rate (i.e., $4.71/kg) is not 
subject to change.\7\ Aside from the no shipments companies discussed 
below, and the companies for which the review is being rescinded, the 
Department considers all other companies for which a review was 
requested, and which did not preliminarily qualify for a separate rate, 
to be part of the PRC-wide entity. For additional information, see the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
    \7\ See Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China: Final 
Results and Partial Rescission of the 13th Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review and New Shipper Reviews, 74 FR 29174 (June 19, 
2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of Administrative Review

    The Department preliminarily determines that the following 
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the administrative review 
covering the period November 1, 2015, through October 31, 2016:

[[Page 57720]]



------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                                                          average margin
                        Exporter                           (dollars per
                                                             kilogram)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shandong Jinxiang Zhengyang Import & Export Co., Ltd....            2.69
Jining Shunchang Import & Export Co., Ltd...............            2.69
Jinxiang Feiteng Import & Export Co., Ltd...............            2.69
Qingdao Sea-Line International Trading Co., Ltd.........            2.69
Shenzhen Bainong Co., Ltd...............................            2.69
Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd....................            2.69
Weifang Hongqiao International Logistics Co., Ltd.......            2.69
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of New Shipper Reviews

    The Department preliminarily determines that the following 
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the new shipper review 
covering the period November 1, 2015, through October 31, 2016:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                                                              average
                        Exporter                              margin
                                                           (dollars per
                                                             kilogram)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qingdao Joinseafoods Co., Ltd. and Join Food Ingredient             2.20
 Inc....................................................
Zhengzhou Yudi Shengjin Agricultural Trade Co., Ltd.....            3.19
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure, Public Comment and Opportunity To Request a Hearing

    The Department intends to disclose the calculations used in our 
analyses to parties in this review within five days of the date of 
publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
    Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted by 
interested parties no later than seven days after the date on which the 
final verification report is issued in these proceedings and rebuttal 
briefs, limited to issues raised in case briefs, may be submitted no 
later than five days after the deadline date for case briefs.\8\ 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who submit case 
briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit 
with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary 
of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\9\ Any electronically 
filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the 
Department's electronic records system, ACCESS, by the date and time it 
is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See 19 CFR 351.309. See also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general 
filing requirements).
    \9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310, any interested party may request a 
hearing within 30 days of publication of this notice. Hearing requests 
should contain the following information: (1) The party's name, 
address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) 
a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral presentations will be 
limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs. If a party 
requests a hearing, the Department will inform parties of the scheduled 
date for the hearing which will be held at the U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time 
and location to be determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the 
date, time, and location of the hearing.
    The Department intends to issue the final results of these reviews, 
including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any 
written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication 
of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.

Assessment Rates

    Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine, 
and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries 
covered by this review, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b). For the 
companies for which this review is rescinded, antidumping duties shall 
be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping 
duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for 
consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i). The Department 
intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions with respect to 
the companies for which this review is rescinded to CBP 15 days after 
the publication of this notice. For the remaining companies subject to 
review, the Department will direct CBP to assess rates based on the 
per-unit (i.e., per kilogram) amount on each entry of the subject 
merchandise during the POR. The Department intends to issue assessment 
instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final 
results of review.
    Pursuant to the Department's assessment practice in NME cases, for 
merchandise that was not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted 
by an exporter individually examined during this review, but that 
entered under the case number of that exporter (i.e., at the 
individually-examined exporter's cash deposit rate), the Department 
will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the NME-wide rate. In 
addition, if the Department determines that an exporter under review 
had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that 
entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's 
rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market 
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the 
subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by 
sections 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed

[[Page 57721]]

above, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in these 
final results of review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, 
then zero cash deposit will be required for that company); (2) for 
previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not 
listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will 
continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent 
period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not 
been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate 
will be the PRC-wide rate of 4.71 U.S. dollars per kilogram; and (4) 
for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not 
received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate 
applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. 
These requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(4).

    Dated: November 29, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary of Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

Companies for Which Administrative Reviews Have Been Rescinded

1. Jining Alpha Food Co., Ltd.
2. Jining Yongjia Trade Co., Ltd.
3. Jinxiang Hejia Co., Ltd.
4. Qingdao Joinseafoods Co., Ltd. and Join Food Ingredient Inc.
5. Zhengzhou Yudi Shengjin Agricultural Trade Co., Ltd.
6. Jinxiang Shengtai Fruits & Vegetables Co., Ltd.

Appendix II

Companies for Which Administrative Reviews Have Been Preliminarily 
Rescinded

1. Jinxiang Jinma Fruits Vegetables Products Co., Ltd
2. Juxian Huateng Food Co., Ltd.
3. Qingdao Hailize (Sea-Line) International Trading Co., Ltd.
4. Qingdao Jiuyihongrun Foods Co., Ltd.
5. Qingdao Ritai Food Co., Ltd.
6. Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co. Ltd.
7. Zhonglian Nongchan Co., Ltd.

Appendix III

Non-Selected Separate Rate Companies

1. Jining Shunchang Import & Export Co., Ltd.
2. Jinxiang Feiteng Import & Export Co., Ltd.
3. Qingdao Sea-Line International Trading Co., Ltd.
4. Shenzhen Bainong Co., Ltd.
5. Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd.
6. Weifang Hongqiao International Logistics Co., Ltd.

Appendix IV

Companies That Have Certified No Shipments

1. Jinan Farmlady Trading Co., Ltd.
2. Jining Shengtai Fruits & Vegetables Co., Ltd.
3. Jining Yifa Garlic Produce Co., Ltd.
4. Jinxiang Richfar Fruits & Vegetables Co., Ltd.
5. Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd.

[FR Doc. 2017-26378 Filed 12-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                                57718                        Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2017 / Notices

                                                constitutes a final decision of the Court                 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
                                                that is not in harmony with the                                                                                 United States (HTSUS) 0703.20.0010,
                                                Department’s Final Results.12 This                        International Trade Administration                    0703.20.0020, and 0703.20.0090.
                                                notice is published in fulfillment of the                 [A–570–831]                                           Although the HTSUS numbers are
                                                Timken publication requirements.                                                                                provided for convenience and customs
                                                                                                          Fresh Garlic From the People’s                        purposes, the written product
                                                Amended Final Results                                     Republic of China: Preliminary                        description remains dispositive. For a
                                                                                                          Results, Preliminary Rescission, and                  full description of the scope of this
                                                   Because there is now a final court
                                                                                                          Final Rescission, in Part, of the 22nd                order, please see ‘‘Scope of the Order’’
                                                decision, we are amending the Final                                                                             in the accompanying Preliminary
                                                Results with respect to the dumping                       Antidumping Duty Administrative
                                                                                                          Review and Preliminary Results of the                 Decision Memorandum.1
                                                margin calculated for Xinboda. Based on
                                                                                                          New Shipper Reviews; 2015–2016                        Partial Rescission of Administrative
                                                the Final Remand Results, as affirmed
                                                by the CIT, the revised dumping margin                    AGENCY:   Enforcement and Compliance,                 Review
                                                for Xinboda, from November 1, 2011,                       International Trade Administration,                      On January 13, 2017, the Department
                                                through October 31, 2012, is $2.19 per                    Department of Commerce.                               initiated a review of 35 companies in
                                                kilogram. The $2.19 per kilogram                          SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce                   this administrative review.2 On April
                                                dumping margin also applies to the                        (the Department) is conducting the 22nd               13, 2017, review requests were timely
                                                following separate rate companies:                        administrative review of the                          withdrawn for six companies.3 In
                                                Jinxiang Richfar, Qingdao Lianghe,                        antidumping duty order on fresh garlic                addition, as discussed in the
                                                Shandong Chenhe, and Weifang                              from the People’s Republic of China                   accompanying Issues and Decision
                                                Hongqiao.                                                 (PRC) and two concurrent new shipper                  Memorandum, one of the companies for
                                                                                                          reviews. The period of review (POR) for               which the review request was timely
                                                   Because the CIT’s ruling was not                                                                             rescinded is a part of the QTF-Entity,
                                                appealed, it represents a final and                       the administrative and new shipper
                                                                                                          reviews is November 1, 2015, through                  which submitted a separate rate
                                                conclusive court decision, and the                                                                              application. Accordingly, this company
                                                                                                          October 31, 2016. The Department
                                                Department will instruct Customs and                                                                            remains subject to review. Moreover, the
                                                                                                          preliminarily determines that
                                                Border Protection (CBP) to assess                                                                               Department inadvertently initiated a
                                                                                                          mandatory respondent, Shandong
                                                antidumping duties on unliquidated                        Jinxiang Zhengyang Import & Export                    review of one company without a
                                                entries of subject merchandise based on                   Co., Ltd. (Zhengyang) sold subject                    request. The Department is, therefore,
                                                the revised dumping margins                               merchandise to the United States at less              partially rescinding this administrative
                                                summarized above.                                         than normal value (NV). We also                       review with respect to the companies
                                                                                                          preliminarily find that the review                    listed in Appendix I, in accordance with
                                                Cash Deposit Requirements                                                                                       19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
                                                                                                          request made by the Coalition for Fair
                                                   The Department will issue revised                      Trade in Garlic (the CFTG) was not                    Preliminary Rescission of
                                                cash deposit instructions to CBP,                         valid, and accordingly have                           Administrative Review
                                                adjusting the cash deposit rate for                       preliminarily rescinded the review with
                                                                                                                                                                   In addition, as discussed in depth at
                                                Jinxiang Richfar and Shandong Chenhe                      respect to seven companies, including
                                                                                                                                                                ‘‘Preliminary Rescission of
                                                to $2.19/kg, effective September 29,                      the other mandatory respondent,
                                                                                                                                                                Administrative Review’’ in the
                                                2017. The Department will not update                      Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co., Ltd.
                                                                                                                                                                accompanying Preliminary Decision
                                                the cash deposit requirements for                         (Harmoni). The Department also
                                                                                                                                                                Memorandum, the Department has
                                                Xinboda, Qingdao Lianghe, and Weifang                     preliminarily determines that the new
                                                                                                                                                                preliminarily determined that the
                                                Hongqiao as they each have later-                         shipper reviews respondents, Qingdao
                                                                                                                                                                review request from the CFTG was
                                                determined rates from Fresh Garlic                        Joinseafoods Co., Ltd. and Join Food
                                                                                                                                                                invalid, and is preliminarily rescinding
                                                From the People’s Republic of China:                      Ingredient Inc. (collectively, Join) and
                                                                                                                                                                the administrative review with respect
                                                                                                          Zhengzhou Yudi Shengjin Agricultural
                                                Final Results and Partial Rescission of                                                                         to the companies listed in Appendix II.
                                                                                                          Trade Co., Ltd. (Yudi), each made sales
                                                the 21st Antidumping Duty
                                                                                                          of subject merchandise at less than                   Methodology
                                                Administrative Review; 2014–2015, 82
                                                                                                          normal value. We invite interested                      The Department is conducting these
                                                FR 27230 (June 14, 2017).                                 parties to comment on these preliminary               reviews in accordance with section
                                                Notification to Interested Parties                        results.                                              751(a)(1)(B) and 751(a)(2)(B) of the
                                                                                                          DATES: Applicable December 7, 2017.                   Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act)
                                                  This notice is issued and published in
                                                                                                          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                      and 19 CFR 351.214. Export prices were
                                                accordance with sections 516A(e)(1),
                                                                                                          Kathryn Wallace or Alexander Cipolla,
                                                751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.                      AD/CVD Operations, Office VII,                          1 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for

                                                  Dated: December 4, 2017.                                Enforcement and Compliance,                           the Preliminary Results, Preliminary Rescission,
                                                                                                                                                                and Final Rescission, In Part, of the 2015–2016
                                                Gary Taverman,                                            International Trade Administration,                   Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
                                                Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping                U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401                     Preliminary Results of the New Shipper Reviews:
                                                and Countervailing Duty Operations,                       Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,                  Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of China’’
                                                                                                          DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6251 or                (November 30, 2017) (Preliminary Decision
                                                performing the non-exclusive functions and                                                                      Memorandum).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                duties of the Assistant Secretary for                     (202) 482–4956.                                         2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
                                                Enforcement and Compliance.                                                                                     Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
                                                                                                          Scope of the Order
                                                [FR Doc. 2017–26388 Filed 12–6–17; 8:45 am]                                                                     4294 (January 13, 2017) (Initiation Notice). For a list
                                                BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
                                                                                                            The merchandise covered by the order                of the 35 companies, see 82 FR 4296–4297.
                                                                                                                                                                  3 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘22nd Administrative
                                                                                                          includes all grades of garlic, whole or
                                                                                                                                                                Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Fresh
                                                                                                          separated into constituent cloves. Fresh              Garlic from the People’s Republic of China—
                                                                                                          garlic that are subject to the order are              Petitioners’ Withdrawal of Certain Requests for
                                                  12 See   Final Results.                                 currently classified under the                        Administrative Review,’’ (April 13, 2017).



                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014     18:50 Dec 06, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00016   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM   07DEN1


                                                                           Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2017 / Notices                                                  57719

                                                calculated in accordance with section                   companies listed in Appendix IV did                   section 735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance,
                                                772(a) of the Act; constructed export                   not have any reviewable transactions                  which provides instructions for
                                                prices were calculated in accordance                    during the POR. In addition, the                      calculating the all-others rate in an
                                                with section 772(b) of the Act. Because                 Department finds that consistent with                 investigation. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the
                                                the PRC is a non-market economy                         its refinement to its assessment practice             Act instructs the Department to use
                                                (NME) within the meaning of section                     in NME cases, further discussed below,                rates established for individually
                                                771(18) of the Act, NV has been                         it is appropriate not to preliminarily                investigated producers and exporters,
                                                calculated in accordance with section                   rescind the administrative review, in                 excluding any rates that are zero, de
                                                773(c) of the Act.                                      part, in these circumstances, but rather              minimis, or based entirely on facts
                                                  For a full description of the                         to complete the administrative review                 available in investigations. In the
                                                methodology underlying our                              with respect to these five companies,                 administrative review, Zhengyang is the
                                                conclusions, see the Preliminary                        and issue appropriate instructions to                 only reviewed respondent that received
                                                Decision Memorandum, which is hereby                    CBP based on the final results of the                 a weighted-average margin. Therefore,
                                                adopted by this notice. The Preliminary                 administrative review.4                               for the preliminary results, the
                                                Decision Memorandum is a public                                                                               Department has preliminarily
                                                document and is on file electronically                  Verification
                                                                                                                                                              determined to assign Zhengyang’s
                                                via Enforcement and Compliance’s                           As provided in section 782(i) of the               margin to the non-selected separate-rate
                                                Antidumping and Countervailing Duty                     Act, we intend to verify the information              companies.
                                                Centralized Electronic Service System                   provided by respondents using standard
                                                (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to                        verification procedures, including on-                PRC-Wide Entity
                                                registered users at http://                             site inspection of the producer’s and
                                                access.trade.gov, and is available to all               exporter’s facilities, and examination of                The Department’s policy regarding
                                                parties in the Central Records Unit,                    relevant sales and financial records. Our             conditional review of the PRC-wide
                                                room B8024 of the main Department of                    verification results will be outlined in              entity applies to this administrative
                                                Commerce building. In addition, a                       the verification report for the respective            review.6 Under this policy, the PRC-
                                                complete version of the Preliminary                     respondents after completion of the                   wide entity will not be under review
                                                Decision Memorandum can be accessed                     verification.                                         unless a party specifically requests, or
                                                directly on the internet at http://                                                                           the Department self-initiates, a review of
                                                enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed                  Preliminary Determination of Separate                 the entity. Because no party requested,
                                                Preliminary Decision Memorandum and                     Rates for Non-Selected Companies                      and the Department did not self-initiate,
                                                the electronic versions of the                             In accordance with section                         a review of the PRC-wide entity for this
                                                Preliminary Decision Memorandum are                     777A(c)(2)(B) of the Act, the Department              POR, the entity is not under review and
                                                identical in content.                                   employed a limited examination                        the entity’s rate (i.e., $4.71/kg) is not
                                                                                                        methodology, as it determined that it                 subject to change.7 Aside from the no
                                                Preliminary Determination of No                         would not be practicable to examine                   shipments companies discussed below,
                                                Shipments                                               individually all companies for which a                and the companies for which the review
                                                   As discussed at ‘‘Preliminary                        review request was made.5 There were                  is being rescinded, the Department
                                                Determination of No Shipments’’ in the                  six exporters of subject merchandise                  considers all other companies for which
                                                accompanying Preliminary Decision                       from the PRC that have demonstrated                   a review was requested, and which did
                                                Memorandum, 14 companies timely                         their eligibility for a separate rate but             not preliminarily qualify for a separate
                                                filed ‘‘no shipment’’ certifications                    were not selected for individual                      rate, to be part of the PRC-wide entity.
                                                stating that they had no entries into the               examination in this review. These six                 For additional information, see the
                                                United States of subject merchandise                    exporters are listed in Appendix III.                 Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
                                                during the POR. However, no review                         Neither the Act nor the Department’s
                                                requests were submitted for five of these                                                                     Preliminary Results of Administrative
                                                                                                        regulations address the establishment of
                                                companies. Moreover, review requests                                                                          Review
                                                                                                        the rate applied to individual
                                                were timely withdrawn for two of these                  companies not selected for examination                  The Department preliminarily
                                                companies. In addition, two of these                    where the Department limited its                      determines that the following weighted-
                                                companies are a part of the QTF-entity,                 examination in an administrative review               average dumping margins exist for the
                                                which filed a separate rate certification,              pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the                 administrative review covering the
                                                as discussed at ‘‘Separate Rate Status of               Act. The Department’s practice in cases               period November 1, 2015, through
                                                the QTF-Entity’’ in the accompanying                    involving limited selection based on                  October 31, 2016:
                                                Issues and Decision Memorandum.                         exporters accounting for the largest
                                                   Accordingly, the Department,                         volume of imports has been to look to                   6 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement
                                                consistent with its practice, requested                                                                       of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
                                                that U.S. Customs and Border Protection                    4 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping               Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
                                                (CBP) conduct a query of potential                      Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76     Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
                                                shipments made by the remaining five                    FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011); see also       Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
                                                                                                        ‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section below.                   FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
                                                companies. Based on the certifications                     5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of         7 See Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of
                                                by the remaining companies and our                      the Antidumping Duty Order on Fresh Garlic from       China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of the
                                                analysis of CBP information, we                         the People’s Republic of China: Respondent            13th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
                                                preliminarily determine that the
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                        Selection Memorandum,’’ dated March 7, 2017.          New Shipper Reviews, 74 FR 29174 (June 19, 2009).




                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:50 Dec 06, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00017   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM   07DEN1


                                                57720                              Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2017 / Notices

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Weighted-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               average
                                                                                                                                      Exporter                                                                                                  margin
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             (dollars per
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              kilogram)

                                                Shandong Jinxiang Zhengyang Import & Export Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................                               2.69
                                                Jining Shunchang Import & Export Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................                    2.69
                                                Jinxiang Feiteng Import & Export Co., Ltd ..........................................................................................................................................                  2.69
                                                Qingdao Sea-Line International Trading Co., Ltd ...............................................................................................................................                       2.69
                                                Shenzhen Bainong Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................................            2.69
                                                Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................................                2.69
                                                Weifang Hongqiao International Logistics Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................                       2.69



                                                Preliminary Results of New Shipper                                     average dumping margins exist for the
                                                Reviews                                                                new shipper review covering the period
                                                  The Department preliminarily                                         November 1, 2015, through October 31,
                                                determines that the following weighted-                                2016:

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Weighted-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               average
                                                                                                                                      Exporter                                                                                                  margin
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             (dollars per
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              kilogram)

                                                Qingdao Joinseafoods Co., Ltd. and Join Food Ingredient Inc. .........................................................................................................                                2.20
                                                Zhengzhou Yudi Shengjin Agricultural Trade Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................                          3.19



                                                Disclosure, Public Comment and                                         limited to issues raised in the case and                                rates based on the per-unit (i.e., per
                                                Opportunity To Request a Hearing                                       rebuttal briefs. If a party requests a                                  kilogram) amount on each entry of the
                                                   The Department intends to disclose                                  hearing, the Department will inform                                     subject merchandise during the POR.
                                                the calculations used in our analyses to                               parties of the scheduled date for the                                   The Department intends to issue
                                                parties in this review within five days                                hearing which will be held at the U.S.                                  assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
                                                of the date of publication of this notice                              Department of Commerce, 1401                                            after the publication date of the final
                                                in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).                                  Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,                                    results of review.
                                                                                                                       DC 20230, at a time and location to be                                     Pursuant to the Department’s
                                                   Case briefs or other written comments
                                                                                                                       determined. Parties should confirm by                                   assessment practice in NME cases, for
                                                may be submitted by interested parties
                                                                                                                       telephone the date, time, and location of                               merchandise that was not reported in
                                                no later than seven days after the date
                                                                                                                       the hearing.                                                            the U.S. sales databases submitted by an
                                                on which the final verification report is
                                                                                                                          The Department intends to issue the                                  exporter individually examined during
                                                issued in these proceedings and rebuttal
                                                                                                                       final results of these reviews, including                               this review, but that entered under the
                                                briefs, limited to issues raised in case
                                                                                                                       the results of its analysis of the issues                               case number of that exporter (i.e., at the
                                                briefs, may be submitted no later than
                                                                                                                       raised in any written briefs, not later                                 individually-examined exporter’s cash
                                                five days after the deadline date for case
                                                                                                                       than 120 days after the date of                                         deposit rate), the Department will
                                                briefs.8 Pursuant to 19 CFR
                                                                                                                       publication of this notice, pursuant to                                 instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at
                                                351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who
                                                                                                                       section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.                                        the NME-wide rate. In addition, if the
                                                submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in
                                                                                                                                                                                               Department determines that an exporter
                                                this proceeding are encouraged to                                      Assessment Rates                                                        under review had no shipments of the
                                                submit with each argument: (1) A
                                                                                                                         Upon issuance of the final results, the                               subject merchandise, any suspended
                                                statement of the issue; (2) a brief
                                                                                                                       Department will determine, and CBP                                      entries that entered under that
                                                summary of the argument; and (3) a
                                                                                                                       shall assess, antidumping duties on all                                 exporter’s case number (i.e., at that
                                                table of authorities.9 Any electronically
                                                                                                                       appropriate entries covered by this                                     exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the
                                                filed document must be received
                                                                                                                       review, in accordance with 19 CFR                                       PRC-wide rate.10
                                                successfully in its entirety by the
                                                Department’s electronic records system,                                351.212(b). For the companies for which                                 Cash Deposit Requirements
                                                ACCESS, by the date and time it is due.                                this review is rescinded, antidumping
                                                                                                                       duties shall be assessed at rates equal to                                The following cash deposit
                                                   Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310, any                                                                                                             requirements will be effective upon
                                                interested party may request a hearing                                 the cash deposit of estimated
                                                                                                                       antidumping duties required at the time                                 publication of the final results of this
                                                within 30 days of publication of this                                                                                                          review for shipments of the subject
                                                notice. Hearing requests should contain                                of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse,
                                                                                                                       for consumption, in accordance with 19                                  merchandise from the PRC entered, or
                                                the following information: (1) The                                                                                                             withdrawn from warehouse, for
                                                                                                                       CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i). The Department
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                party’s name, address, and telephone                                                                                                           consumption on or after the publication
                                                number; (2) the number of participants;                                intends to issue appropriate assessment
                                                                                                                       instructions with respect to the                                        date, as provided by sections 751(a)(2)
                                                and (3) a list of the issues to be                                                                                                             of the Act: (1) For the companies listed
                                                discussed. Oral presentations will be                                  companies for which this review is
                                                                                                                       rescinded to CBP 15 days after the                                        10 For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-
                                                  8 See  19 CFR 351.309. See also 19 CFR 351.303                       publication of this notice. For the                                     Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
                                                (for general filing requirements).                                     remaining companies subject to review,                                  Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
                                                   9 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2).                                         the Department will direct CBP to assess                                (October 24, 2011).



                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014        18:50 Dec 06, 2017        Jkt 244001     PO 00000       Frm 00018      Fmt 4703      Sfmt 4703      E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM             07DEN1


                                                                           Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2017 / Notices                                                   57721

                                                above, the cash deposit rate will be the                3. Qingdao Hailize (Sea-Line) International           SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                rate established in these final results of                  Trading Co., Ltd.
                                                                                                        4. Qingdao Jiuyihongrun Foods Co., Ltd.               Background
                                                review (except, if the rate is zero or de
                                                minimis, then zero cash deposit will be                 5. Qingdao Ritai Food Co., Ltd.                          On April 27, 2007, the Department
                                                                                                        6. Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co. Ltd.                   published in the Federal Register the
                                                required for that company); (2) for                     7. Zhonglian Nongchan Co., Ltd.
                                                previously investigated or reviewed PRC                                                                       antidumping duty order on certain
                                                and non-PRC exporters not listed above                  Appendix III                                          activated carbon from the PRC.1 On
                                                that have separate rates, the cash                                                                            April 3, 2017, the Department published
                                                                                                        Non-Selected Separate Rate Companies
                                                deposit rate will continue to be the                                                                          a notice of opportunity to request an
                                                                                                        1. Jining Shunchang Import & Export Co.,              administrative review of the
                                                exporter-specific rate published for the
                                                                                                             Ltd.                                             antidumping duty order on certain
                                                most recent period; (3) for all PRC                     2. Jinxiang Feiteng Import & Export Co., Ltd.
                                                exporters of subject merchandise which                                                                        activated carbon from the PRC for the
                                                                                                        3. Qingdao Sea-Line International Trading
                                                have not been found to be entitled to a                      Co., Ltd.                                        April 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017
                                                separate rate, the cash deposit rate will               4. Shenzhen Bainong Co., Ltd.                         period of review (POR).2
                                                be the PRC-wide rate of 4.71 U.S. dollars               5. Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd.                 On April 14, 2017, Shanxi Sincere
                                                per kilogram; and (4) for all non-PRC                   6. Weifang Hongqiao International Logistics           Industrial Co., Ltd. (Shanxi Sincere)
                                                exporters of subject merchandise which                       Co., Ltd.                                        requested a review of itself.3 On April
                                                have not received their own rate, the                                                                         26, 2017, Tancarb Activated Carbon Co.,
                                                                                                        Appendix IV                                           Ltd. (Tancarb) requested a review of
                                                cash deposit rate will be the rate
                                                applicable to the PRC exporter that                     Companies That Have Certified No                      itself.4 On April 28, 2017, Calgon
                                                supplied that non-PRC exporter. These                   Shipments                                             Carbon Corporation and Cabon Norit
                                                requirements, when imposed, shall                       1. Jinan Farmlady Trading Co., Ltd.                   Americas Inc. (the petitioners) requested
                                                remain in effect until further notice.                  2. Jining Shengtai Fruits & Vegetables Co.,           an administrative review of 207
                                                                                                             Ltd.                                             companies; 5 Beijing Pacific Activated
                                                Notification to Importers                               3. Jining Yifa Garlic Produce Co., Ltd.               Carbon Products Co., Ltd. (Beijing
                                                  This notice serves as a preliminary                   4. Jinxiang Richfar Fruits & Vegetables Co.,          Pacific) requested a review of itself; 6
                                                reminder to importers of their                               Ltd.                                             and Carbon Activated Corporation (CA
                                                                                                        5. Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd.
                                                responsibility under 19 CFR                                                                                   Corporation) requested reviews of
                                                351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate                     [FR Doc. 2017–26378 Filed 12–6–17; 8:45 am]           Carbon Activated Tinanjin Co., Ltd. (CA
                                                regarding the reimbursement of                          BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P                                Tianjin), Ningxia Mineral & Chemical
                                                antidumping duties prior to liquidation                                                                       Limited, Shanxi Sincere, Tancarb, and
                                                of the relevant entries during this                                                                           Tianjin Maijin Industries Co., Ltd.7 On
                                                review period. Failure to comply with                   DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                May 1, 2017, Carbon Activated Tianjin
                                                this requirement could result in the                                                                          Co., Ltd. (CA Tianjin),8 Datong Juqiang
                                                                                                        International Trade Administration
                                                Department’s presumption that                                                                                 Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. (Datong
                                                reimbursement of antidumping duties                     [A–570–904]                                           Juqiang),9 Jilin Bright Future Chemicals
                                                occurred and the subsequent assessment                                                                        Company, Ltd. (Jilin Bright Future),10
                                                of double antidumping duties.                           Certain Activated Carbon From the
                                                  We are issuing and publishing these                   People’s Republic of China: Notice of                    1 Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Certain

                                                preliminary results in accordance with                  Partial Rescission of Antidumping                     Activated Carbon from the People’s Republic of
                                                                                                        Duty Administrative Review; 2016–                     China, 72 FR 20988, dated April 27, 2017.
                                                sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act,                                                                        2 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
                                                and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and                               2017
                                                                                                                                                              Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
                                                351.221(b)(4).                                          AGENCY:   Enforcement and Compliance,                 to Request Administrative Review, 82 FR 16163,
                                                                                                                                                              dated April 3, 2017.
                                                  Dated: November 29, 2017.                             International Trade Administration,                      3 See Shanxi Sincere’s submission, ‘‘Certain
                                                Gary Taverman,                                          Department of Commerce.                               Activated Carbon from the People’s Republic of
                                                Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping              SUMMARY: On June 7, 2017, the                         China Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated
                                                and Countervailing Duty Operations,                     Department of Commerce (the                           April 14, 2017.
                                                                                                                                                                 4 See Tancarb’s submission, ‘‘Activated Carbon
                                                performing the non-exclusive functions and              Department) published a notice of
                                                duties of the Assistant Secretary of                                                                          from the People’s Republic of China: Request for
                                                                                                        initiation of an administrative review of             Administrative Review,’’ dated April 26, 2017.
                                                Enforcement and Compliance.
                                                                                                        the antidumping duty order on certain                    5 See the petitioners’ submission, ‘‘Certain

                                                Appendix I                                              activated carbon from the People’s                    Activated Carbon from the People’s Republic of
                                                                                                        Republic of China (PRC). Based on the                 China—Petitioners’ Request for Initiation of Tenth
                                                Companies for Which Administrative                                                                            Administrative Review,’’ dated April 28, 2017
                                                Reviews Have Been Rescinded                             timely withdrawal of the requests for                 (Petitioners’ Request for Review).
                                                                                                        review of certain companies, we are                      6 See Beijing Pacific’s submission, ‘‘Activated
                                                1. Jining Alpha Food Co., Ltd.
                                                2. Jining Yongjia Trade Co., Ltd.
                                                                                                        now rescinding this administrative                    Carbon from the People’s Republic of China:
                                                3. Jinxiang Hejia Co., Ltd.                             review for the period April 1, 2016                   Administrative Review Request,’’ dated April 28,
                                                                                                        through March 31, 2017, with respect to               2107.
                                                4. Qingdao Joinseafoods Co., Ltd. and Join                                                                       7 See CA Corporation’s submission, ‘‘Activated
                                                     Food Ingredient Inc.                               184 companies.                                        Carbon from the People’s Republic of China Request
                                                5. Zhengzhou Yudi Shengjin Agricultural                 DATES: Effective December 7, 2017.                    for Administrative Review,’’ dated April 28, 2017.
                                                     Trade Co., Ltd.                                                                                             8 See CA Tianjin’s submission, ‘‘Activated Carbon
                                                                                                        FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
                                                6. Jinxiang Shengtai Fruits & Vegetables Co.,                                                                 from the People’s Republic of China Request for
                                                                                                        Anwesen or Jinny Ahn, AD/CVD
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                     Ltd.                                                                                                     Administrative Review,’’ dated May 1, 2017.
                                                                                                        Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement                     9 See Datong Juqiang’s submission, ‘‘Certain
                                                Appendix II                                             and Compliance, International Trade                   Activated Carbon from the People’s Republic of
                                                Companies for Which Administrative                      Administration, U.S. Department of                    China; Request for Antidumping Administrative
                                                                                                        Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue                    Review,’’ dated May 1, 2017.
                                                Reviews Have Been Preliminarily Rescinded                                                                        10 See Jilin Bright Future’s submission,
                                                1. Jinxiang Jinma Fruits Vegetables Products            NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:                 ‘‘Activated Carbon from the People’s Republic of
                                                     Co., Ltd                                           (202) 482–0131 or (202) 482–0339,                     China Request for Antidumping Administrative
                                                2. Juxian Huateng Food Co., Ltd.                        respectively.                                         Review,’’ dated May 1, 2017.



                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:50 Dec 06, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00019   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM   07DEN1



Document Created: 2017-12-07 00:34:40
Document Modified: 2017-12-07 00:34:40
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesApplicable December 7, 2017.
ContactKathryn Wallace or Alexander Cipolla, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 6251 or (202) 482-4956.
FR Citation82 FR 57718 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR