82 FR 57718 - Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results, Preliminary Rescission, and Final Rescission, in Part, of the 22nd Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Results of the New Shipper Reviews; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 234 (December 7, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 234 (December 7, 2017)
| Page Range | 57718-57721 | |
| FR Document | 2017-26378 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 234 (Thursday, December 7, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 57718-57721] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-26378] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-831] Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results, Preliminary Rescission, and Final Rescission, in Part, of the 22nd Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Results of the New Shipper Reviews; 2015-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting the 22nd administrative review of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from the People's Republic of China (PRC) and two concurrent new shipper reviews. The period of review (POR) for the administrative and new shipper reviews is November 1, 2015, through October 31, 2016. The Department preliminarily determines that mandatory respondent, Shandong Jinxiang Zhengyang Import & Export Co., Ltd. (Zhengyang) sold subject merchandise to the United States at less than normal value (NV). We also preliminarily find that the review request made by the Coalition for Fair Trade in Garlic (the CFTG) was not valid, and accordingly have preliminarily rescinded the review with respect to seven companies, including the other mandatory respondent, Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co., Ltd. (Harmoni). The Department also preliminarily determines that the new shipper reviews respondents, Qingdao Joinseafoods Co., Ltd. and Join Food Ingredient Inc. (collectively, Join) and Zhengzhou Yudi Shengjin Agricultural Trade Co., Ltd. (Yudi), each made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable December 7, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathryn Wallace or Alexander Cipolla, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 6251 or (202) 482-4956. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order includes all grades of garlic, whole or separated into constituent cloves. Fresh garlic that are subject to the order are currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 0703.20.0010, 0703.20.0020, and 0703.20.0090. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description remains dispositive. For a full description of the scope of this order, please see ``Scope of the Order'' in the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results, Preliminary Rescission, and Final Rescission, In Part, of the 2015-2016 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Results of the New Shipper Reviews: Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China'' (November 30, 2017) (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Partial Rescission of Administrative Review On January 13, 2017, the Department initiated a review of 35 companies in this administrative review.\2\ On April 13, 2017, review requests were timely withdrawn for six companies.\3\ In addition, as discussed in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, one of the companies for which the review request was timely rescinded is a part of the QTF-Entity, which submitted a separate rate application. Accordingly, this company remains subject to review. Moreover, the Department inadvertently initiated a review of one company without a request. The Department is, therefore, partially rescinding this administrative review with respect to the companies listed in Appendix I, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 4294 (January 13, 2017) (Initiation Notice). For a list of the 35 companies, see 82 FR 4296-4297. \3\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``22nd Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China--Petitioners' Withdrawal of Certain Requests for Administrative Review,'' (April 13, 2017). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Rescission of Administrative Review In addition, as discussed in depth at ``Preliminary Rescission of Administrative Review'' in the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum, the Department has preliminarily determined that the review request from the CFTG was invalid, and is preliminarily rescinding the administrative review with respect to the companies listed in Appendix II. Methodology The Department is conducting these reviews in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) and 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.214. Export prices were [[Page 57719]] calculated in accordance with section 772(a) of the Act; constructed export prices were calculated in accordance with section 772(b) of the Act. Because the PRC is a non-market economy (NME) within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, NV has been calculated in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments As discussed at ``Preliminary Determination of No Shipments'' in the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum, 14 companies timely filed ``no shipment'' certifications stating that they had no entries into the United States of subject merchandise during the POR. However, no review requests were submitted for five of these companies. Moreover, review requests were timely withdrawn for two of these companies. In addition, two of these companies are a part of the QTF- entity, which filed a separate rate certification, as discussed at ``Separate Rate Status of the QTF-Entity'' in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. Accordingly, the Department, consistent with its practice, requested that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) conduct a query of potential shipments made by the remaining five companies. Based on the certifications by the remaining companies and our analysis of CBP information, we preliminarily determine that the companies listed in Appendix IV did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR. In addition, the Department finds that consistent with its refinement to its assessment practice in NME cases, further discussed below, it is appropriate not to preliminarily rescind the administrative review, in part, in these circumstances, but rather to complete the administrative review with respect to these five companies, and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of the administrative review.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011); see also ``Assessment Rates'' section below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Verification As provided in section 782(i) of the Act, we intend to verify the information provided by respondents using standard verification procedures, including on-site inspection of the producer's and exporter's facilities, and examination of relevant sales and financial records. Our verification results will be outlined in the verification report for the respective respondents after completion of the verification. Preliminary Determination of Separate Rates for Non-Selected Companies In accordance with section 777A(c)(2)(B) of the Act, the Department employed a limited examination methodology, as it determined that it would not be practicable to examine individually all companies for which a review request was made.\5\ There were six exporters of subject merchandise from the PRC that have demonstrated their eligibility for a separate rate but were not selected for individual examination in this review. These six exporters are listed in Appendix III. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Memorandum, ``Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China: Respondent Selection Memorandum,'' dated March 7, 2017. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Neither the Act nor the Department's regulations address the establishment of the rate applied to individual companies not selected for examination where the Department limited its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. The Department's practice in cases involving limited selection based on exporters accounting for the largest volume of imports has been to look to section 735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an investigation. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act instructs the Department to use rates established for individually investigated producers and exporters, excluding any rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available in investigations. In the administrative review, Zhengyang is the only reviewed respondent that received a weighted- average margin. Therefore, for the preliminary results, the Department has preliminarily determined to assign Zhengyang's margin to the non- selected separate-rate companies. PRC-Wide Entity The Department's policy regarding conditional review of the PRC- wide entity applies to this administrative review.\6\ Under this policy, the PRC-wide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or the Department self-initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party requested, and the Department did not self-initiate, a review of the PRC-wide entity for this POR, the entity is not under review and the entity's rate (i.e., $4.71/kg) is not subject to change.\7\ Aside from the no shipments companies discussed below, and the companies for which the review is being rescinded, the Department considers all other companies for which a review was requested, and which did not preliminarily qualify for a separate rate, to be part of the PRC-wide entity. For additional information, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). \7\ See Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of the 13th Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Reviews, 74 FR 29174 (June 19, 2009). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of Administrative Review The Department preliminarily determines that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the administrative review covering the period November 1, 2015, through October 31, 2016: [[Page 57720]] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average margin Exporter (dollars per kilogram) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shandong Jinxiang Zhengyang Import & Export Co., Ltd.... 2.69 Jining Shunchang Import & Export Co., Ltd............... 2.69 Jinxiang Feiteng Import & Export Co., Ltd............... 2.69 Qingdao Sea-Line International Trading Co., Ltd......... 2.69 Shenzhen Bainong Co., Ltd............................... 2.69 Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd.................... 2.69 Weifang Hongqiao International Logistics Co., Ltd....... 2.69 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Preliminary Results of New Shipper Reviews The Department preliminarily determines that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the new shipper review covering the period November 1, 2015, through October 31, 2016: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter margin (dollars per kilogram) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Qingdao Joinseafoods Co., Ltd. and Join Food Ingredient 2.20 Inc.................................................... Zhengzhou Yudi Shengjin Agricultural Trade Co., Ltd..... 3.19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure, Public Comment and Opportunity To Request a Hearing The Department intends to disclose the calculations used in our analyses to parties in this review within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted by interested parties no later than seven days after the date on which the final verification report is issued in these proceedings and rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in case briefs, may be submitted no later than five days after the deadline date for case briefs.\8\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\9\ Any electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic records system, ACCESS, by the date and time it is due. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See 19 CFR 351.309. See also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). \9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310, any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of publication of this notice. Hearing requests should contain the following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs. If a party requests a hearing, the Department will inform parties of the scheduled date for the hearing which will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and location to be determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing. The Department intends to issue the final results of these reviews, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b). For the companies for which this review is rescinded, antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i). The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions with respect to the companies for which this review is rescinded to CBP 15 days after the publication of this notice. For the remaining companies subject to review, the Department will direct CBP to assess rates based on the per-unit (i.e., per kilogram) amount on each entry of the subject merchandise during the POR. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of review. Pursuant to the Department's assessment practice in NME cases, for merchandise that was not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by an exporter individually examined during this review, but that entered under the case number of that exporter (i.e., at the individually-examined exporter's cash deposit rate), the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the NME-wide rate. In addition, if the Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by sections 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed [[Page 57721]] above, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in these final results of review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required for that company); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 4.71 U.S. dollars per kilogram; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(4). Dated: November 29, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary of Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I Companies for Which Administrative Reviews Have Been Rescinded 1. Jining Alpha Food Co., Ltd. 2. Jining Yongjia Trade Co., Ltd. 3. Jinxiang Hejia Co., Ltd. 4. Qingdao Joinseafoods Co., Ltd. and Join Food Ingredient Inc. 5. Zhengzhou Yudi Shengjin Agricultural Trade Co., Ltd. 6. Jinxiang Shengtai Fruits & Vegetables Co., Ltd. Appendix II Companies for Which Administrative Reviews Have Been Preliminarily Rescinded 1. Jinxiang Jinma Fruits Vegetables Products Co., Ltd 2. Juxian Huateng Food Co., Ltd. 3. Qingdao Hailize (Sea-Line) International Trading Co., Ltd. 4. Qingdao Jiuyihongrun Foods Co., Ltd. 5. Qingdao Ritai Food Co., Ltd. 6. Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co. Ltd. 7. Zhonglian Nongchan Co., Ltd. Appendix III Non-Selected Separate Rate Companies 1. Jining Shunchang Import & Export Co., Ltd. 2. Jinxiang Feiteng Import & Export Co., Ltd. 3. Qingdao Sea-Line International Trading Co., Ltd. 4. Shenzhen Bainong Co., Ltd. 5. Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd. 6. Weifang Hongqiao International Logistics Co., Ltd. Appendix IV Companies That Have Certified No Shipments 1. Jinan Farmlady Trading Co., Ltd. 2. Jining Shengtai Fruits & Vegetables Co., Ltd. 3. Jining Yifa Garlic Produce Co., Ltd. 4. Jinxiang Richfar Fruits & Vegetables Co., Ltd. 5. Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd. [FR Doc. 2017-26378 Filed 12-6-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![57718 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2017 / Notices
constitutes a final decision of the Court DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
that is not in harmony with the United States (HTSUS) 0703.20.0010,
Department’s Final Results.12 This International Trade Administration 0703.20.0020, and 0703.20.0090.
notice is published in fulfillment of the [A–570–831] Although the HTSUS numbers are
Timken publication requirements. provided for convenience and customs
Fresh Garlic From the People’s purposes, the written product
Amended Final Results Republic of China: Preliminary description remains dispositive. For a
Results, Preliminary Rescission, and full description of the scope of this
Because there is now a final court
Final Rescission, in Part, of the 22nd order, please see ‘‘Scope of the Order’’
decision, we are amending the Final in the accompanying Preliminary
Results with respect to the dumping Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Preliminary Results of the Decision Memorandum.1
margin calculated for Xinboda. Based on
New Shipper Reviews; 2015–2016 Partial Rescission of Administrative
the Final Remand Results, as affirmed
by the CIT, the revised dumping margin AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Review
for Xinboda, from November 1, 2011, International Trade Administration, On January 13, 2017, the Department
through October 31, 2012, is $2.19 per Department of Commerce. initiated a review of 35 companies in
kilogram. The $2.19 per kilogram SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce this administrative review.2 On April
dumping margin also applies to the (the Department) is conducting the 22nd 13, 2017, review requests were timely
following separate rate companies: administrative review of the withdrawn for six companies.3 In
Jinxiang Richfar, Qingdao Lianghe, antidumping duty order on fresh garlic addition, as discussed in the
Shandong Chenhe, and Weifang from the People’s Republic of China accompanying Issues and Decision
Hongqiao. (PRC) and two concurrent new shipper Memorandum, one of the companies for
reviews. The period of review (POR) for which the review request was timely
Because the CIT’s ruling was not rescinded is a part of the QTF-Entity,
appealed, it represents a final and the administrative and new shipper
reviews is November 1, 2015, through which submitted a separate rate
conclusive court decision, and the application. Accordingly, this company
October 31, 2016. The Department
Department will instruct Customs and remains subject to review. Moreover, the
preliminarily determines that
Border Protection (CBP) to assess Department inadvertently initiated a
mandatory respondent, Shandong
antidumping duties on unliquidated Jinxiang Zhengyang Import & Export review of one company without a
entries of subject merchandise based on Co., Ltd. (Zhengyang) sold subject request. The Department is, therefore,
the revised dumping margins merchandise to the United States at less partially rescinding this administrative
summarized above. than normal value (NV). We also review with respect to the companies
preliminarily find that the review listed in Appendix I, in accordance with
Cash Deposit Requirements 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
request made by the Coalition for Fair
The Department will issue revised Trade in Garlic (the CFTG) was not Preliminary Rescission of
cash deposit instructions to CBP, valid, and accordingly have Administrative Review
adjusting the cash deposit rate for preliminarily rescinded the review with
In addition, as discussed in depth at
Jinxiang Richfar and Shandong Chenhe respect to seven companies, including
‘‘Preliminary Rescission of
to $2.19/kg, effective September 29, the other mandatory respondent,
Administrative Review’’ in the
2017. The Department will not update Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co., Ltd.
accompanying Preliminary Decision
the cash deposit requirements for (Harmoni). The Department also
Memorandum, the Department has
Xinboda, Qingdao Lianghe, and Weifang preliminarily determines that the new
preliminarily determined that the
Hongqiao as they each have later- shipper reviews respondents, Qingdao
review request from the CFTG was
determined rates from Fresh Garlic Joinseafoods Co., Ltd. and Join Food
invalid, and is preliminarily rescinding
From the People’s Republic of China: Ingredient Inc. (collectively, Join) and
the administrative review with respect
Zhengzhou Yudi Shengjin Agricultural
Final Results and Partial Rescission of to the companies listed in Appendix II.
Trade Co., Ltd. (Yudi), each made sales
the 21st Antidumping Duty
of subject merchandise at less than Methodology
Administrative Review; 2014–2015, 82
normal value. We invite interested The Department is conducting these
FR 27230 (June 14, 2017). parties to comment on these preliminary reviews in accordance with section
Notification to Interested Parties results. 751(a)(1)(B) and 751(a)(2)(B) of the
DATES: Applicable December 7, 2017. Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act)
This notice is issued and published in
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: and 19 CFR 351.214. Export prices were
accordance with sections 516A(e)(1),
Kathryn Wallace or Alexander Cipolla,
751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, 1 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
Dated: December 4, 2017. Enforcement and Compliance, the Preliminary Results, Preliminary Rescission,
and Final Rescission, In Part, of the 2015–2016
Gary Taverman, International Trade Administration, Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Preliminary Results of the New Shipper Reviews:
and Countervailing Duty Operations, Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of China’’
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6251 or (November 30, 2017) (Preliminary Decision
performing the non-exclusive functions and Memorandum).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
duties of the Assistant Secretary for (202) 482–4956. 2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Enforcement and Compliance. Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
Scope of the Order
[FR Doc. 2017–26388 Filed 12–6–17; 8:45 am] 4294 (January 13, 2017) (Initiation Notice). For a list
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
The merchandise covered by the order of the 35 companies, see 82 FR 4296–4297.
3 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘22nd Administrative
includes all grades of garlic, whole or
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Fresh
separated into constituent cloves. Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of China—
garlic that are subject to the order are Petitioners’ Withdrawal of Certain Requests for
12 See Final Results. currently classified under the Administrative Review,’’ (April 13, 2017).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:50 Dec 06, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM 07DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_57952/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2017 / Notices 57721
above, the cash deposit rate will be the 3. Qingdao Hailize (Sea-Line) International SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rate established in these final results of Trading Co., Ltd.
4. Qingdao Jiuyihongrun Foods Co., Ltd. Background
review (except, if the rate is zero or de
minimis, then zero cash deposit will be 5. Qingdao Ritai Food Co., Ltd. On April 27, 2007, the Department
6. Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co. Ltd. published in the Federal Register the
required for that company); (2) for 7. Zhonglian Nongchan Co., Ltd.
previously investigated or reviewed PRC antidumping duty order on certain
and non-PRC exporters not listed above Appendix III activated carbon from the PRC.1 On
that have separate rates, the cash April 3, 2017, the Department published
Non-Selected Separate Rate Companies
deposit rate will continue to be the a notice of opportunity to request an
1. Jining Shunchang Import & Export Co., administrative review of the
exporter-specific rate published for the
Ltd. antidumping duty order on certain
most recent period; (3) for all PRC 2. Jinxiang Feiteng Import & Export Co., Ltd.
exporters of subject merchandise which activated carbon from the PRC for the
3. Qingdao Sea-Line International Trading
have not been found to be entitled to a Co., Ltd. April 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 4. Shenzhen Bainong Co., Ltd. period of review (POR).2
be the PRC-wide rate of 4.71 U.S. dollars 5. Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd. On April 14, 2017, Shanxi Sincere
per kilogram; and (4) for all non-PRC 6. Weifang Hongqiao International Logistics Industrial Co., Ltd. (Shanxi Sincere)
exporters of subject merchandise which Co., Ltd. requested a review of itself.3 On April
have not received their own rate, the 26, 2017, Tancarb Activated Carbon Co.,
Appendix IV Ltd. (Tancarb) requested a review of
cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter that Companies That Have Certified No itself.4 On April 28, 2017, Calgon
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These Shipments Carbon Corporation and Cabon Norit
requirements, when imposed, shall 1. Jinan Farmlady Trading Co., Ltd. Americas Inc. (the petitioners) requested
remain in effect until further notice. 2. Jining Shengtai Fruits & Vegetables Co., an administrative review of 207
Ltd. companies; 5 Beijing Pacific Activated
Notification to Importers 3. Jining Yifa Garlic Produce Co., Ltd. Carbon Products Co., Ltd. (Beijing
This notice serves as a preliminary 4. Jinxiang Richfar Fruits & Vegetables Co., Pacific) requested a review of itself; 6
reminder to importers of their Ltd. and Carbon Activated Corporation (CA
5. Shijiazhuang Goodman Trading Co., Ltd.
responsibility under 19 CFR Corporation) requested reviews of
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate [FR Doc. 2017–26378 Filed 12–6–17; 8:45 am] Carbon Activated Tinanjin Co., Ltd. (CA
regarding the reimbursement of BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Tianjin), Ningxia Mineral & Chemical
antidumping duties prior to liquidation Limited, Shanxi Sincere, Tancarb, and
of the relevant entries during this Tianjin Maijin Industries Co., Ltd.7 On
review period. Failure to comply with DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE May 1, 2017, Carbon Activated Tianjin
this requirement could result in the Co., Ltd. (CA Tianjin),8 Datong Juqiang
International Trade Administration
Department’s presumption that Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. (Datong
reimbursement of antidumping duties [A–570–904] Juqiang),9 Jilin Bright Future Chemicals
occurred and the subsequent assessment Company, Ltd. (Jilin Bright Future),10
of double antidumping duties. Certain Activated Carbon From the
We are issuing and publishing these People’s Republic of China: Notice of 1 Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Certain
preliminary results in accordance with Partial Rescission of Antidumping Activated Carbon from the People’s Republic of
Duty Administrative Review; 2016– China, 72 FR 20988, dated April 27, 2017.
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, 2 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 2017
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
351.221(b)(4). AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, to Request Administrative Review, 82 FR 16163,
dated April 3, 2017.
Dated: November 29, 2017. International Trade Administration, 3 See Shanxi Sincere’s submission, ‘‘Certain
Gary Taverman, Department of Commerce. Activated Carbon from the People’s Republic of
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping SUMMARY: On June 7, 2017, the China Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated
and Countervailing Duty Operations, Department of Commerce (the April 14, 2017.
4 See Tancarb’s submission, ‘‘Activated Carbon
performing the non-exclusive functions and Department) published a notice of
duties of the Assistant Secretary of from the People’s Republic of China: Request for
initiation of an administrative review of Administrative Review,’’ dated April 26, 2017.
Enforcement and Compliance.
the antidumping duty order on certain 5 See the petitioners’ submission, ‘‘Certain
Appendix I activated carbon from the People’s Activated Carbon from the People’s Republic of
Republic of China (PRC). Based on the China—Petitioners’ Request for Initiation of Tenth
Companies for Which Administrative Administrative Review,’’ dated April 28, 2017
Reviews Have Been Rescinded timely withdrawal of the requests for (Petitioners’ Request for Review).
review of certain companies, we are 6 See Beijing Pacific’s submission, ‘‘Activated
1. Jining Alpha Food Co., Ltd.
2. Jining Yongjia Trade Co., Ltd.
now rescinding this administrative Carbon from the People’s Republic of China:
3. Jinxiang Hejia Co., Ltd. review for the period April 1, 2016 Administrative Review Request,’’ dated April 28,
through March 31, 2017, with respect to 2107.
4. Qingdao Joinseafoods Co., Ltd. and Join 7 See CA Corporation’s submission, ‘‘Activated
Food Ingredient Inc. 184 companies. Carbon from the People’s Republic of China Request
5. Zhengzhou Yudi Shengjin Agricultural DATES: Effective December 7, 2017. for Administrative Review,’’ dated April 28, 2017.
Trade Co., Ltd. 8 See CA Tianjin’s submission, ‘‘Activated Carbon
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
6. Jinxiang Shengtai Fruits & Vegetables Co., from the People’s Republic of China Request for
Anwesen or Jinny Ahn, AD/CVD
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Ltd. Administrative Review,’’ dated May 1, 2017.
Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement 9 See Datong Juqiang’s submission, ‘‘Certain
Appendix II and Compliance, International Trade Activated Carbon from the People’s Republic of
Companies for Which Administrative Administration, U.S. Department of China; Request for Antidumping Administrative
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue Review,’’ dated May 1, 2017.
Reviews Have Been Preliminarily Rescinded 10 See Jilin Bright Future’s submission,
1. Jinxiang Jinma Fruits Vegetables Products NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: ‘‘Activated Carbon from the People’s Republic of
Co., Ltd (202) 482–0131 or (202) 482–0339, China Request for Antidumping Administrative
2. Juxian Huateng Food Co., Ltd. respectively. Review,’’ dated May 1, 2017.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:50 Dec 06, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM 07DEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_57952/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2017-12-07 00:34:40
Document Modified: 2017-12-07 00:34:40
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable December 7, 2017. | |
| Contact | Kathryn Wallace or Alexander Cipolla, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 6251 or (202) 482-4956. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 57718 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR