82 FR 58578 - Special Local Regulation; Gasparilla Marine Parade; Hillsborough Bay; Tampa, FL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 238 (December 13, 2017)

Page Range		58578-58580
FR Document		2017-26830
The Coast Guard is establishing a special local regulation for the annual Gasparilla Marine Parade on the waters of Hillsborough Bay in the vicinity of Tampa, Florida. This event is expected to attract over 600 spectator craft along the parade route, with approximately 18 vessels participating in the official flotilla. The parade is scheduled to take place annually on the last Saturday in January. This regulation is necessary to ensure the safety of public, the official flotilla, and spectator vessels before, during, and after the conclusion of the parade.
Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 238 (Wednesday, December 13, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 13, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 58578-58580]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26830]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2017-0332]
RIN 1625-AA08


Special Local Regulation; Gasparilla Marine Parade; Hillsborough 
Bay; Tampa, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a special local regulation for 
the annual Gasparilla Marine Parade on the waters of Hillsborough Bay 
in the vicinity of Tampa, Florida. This event is expected to attract 
over 600 spectator craft along the parade route, with approximately 18 
vessels participating in the official flotilla. The parade is scheduled 
to take place annually on the last Saturday in January. This regulation 
is necessary to ensure the safety of public, the official flotilla, and 
spectator vessels before, during, and after the conclusion of the 
parade.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before January 12, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2017-0332 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for 
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further 
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
proposed rulemaking, call or email Marine Science Technician First 
Class Michael D. Shackleford, Sector St. Petersburg Prevention 
Department, Coast Guard; telephone (813)228-2191, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    The Coast Guard proposes to establish a special local regulation on 
the waters of the Hillsborough Bay, Tampa, Florida

[[Page 58579]]

during the annual Gasparilla Marine Parade. This event is expected to 
attract over 600 spectator craft along the parade route, with 
approximately 18 vessels participating in the official flotilla. The 
parade is scheduled to take place annually on the last Saturday in 
January. This proposed rulemaking is necessary to ensure the safety of 
public, the official flotilla, and spectator vessels on these navigable 
waters of the United States during the Annual Gasparilla Marine Parade. 
The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1233.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    This rule establishes a temporary special local regulation for the 
Gasparilla Marine Parade on the waters of Hillsborough Bay in Tampa, 
Florida annually on the last saturday in January. This special 
regulation sets forth specific requirements for vessels operating 
within the regulated area during the period of enforcement.
    Persons and vessels not meeting the requirements of this regulation 
may request authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or 
remain within the regulated area by contacting the Captain of the Port 
St. Petersburg by telephone at (727) 824-7506, or a designated 
representative via VHF radio on channel 16. If authorization to enter, 
transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area is 
granted by the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a designated 
representative, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization 
must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port St. 
Petersburg or a designated representative. The Coast Guard will provide 
notice of the special local regulations by Local Notice to Mariners, 
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and/or on-scene designated 
representatives.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and 
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated 
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. 
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management 
and Budget.
    The economic impact of this rule is not significant for the 
following reasons: (1) The special local regulation will be enforced 
for only nine hours; (2) although certain persons and vessels are 
prohibited to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the 
regulated area without authorization from the Captain of the Port St. 
Petersburg or a designated representative, they may operate in the 
surrounding area during the enforcement period; (3) the Coast Guard 
will provide advance notification of the special local regulations to 
the local maritime community by Local Notice to Mariners and/or 
Broadcast Notice to Mariners; and (4) persons and vessels not meeting 
the requirements of this regulation may request authorization to enter, 
transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area by 
contacting the Captain of the Port or a designated representative.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    This rule may affect the following entities, some of which may be 
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to enter, 
transit through, anchor in, or remain within that portion of 
Hillsborough Bay, Tampa, FL, encompassed within the special local 
regulation annually on the last saturday in January. For the reasons 
stated in section IV.A above, this rule will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that 
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action 
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the

[[Page 58580]]

effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made 
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of 
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. This rule involves a special local 
regulation issued in conjunction with a regatta or marine parade. This 
rule is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph (34) 
(h) of Figure 2-1 of Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. We seek any 
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant 
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comments can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal 
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal 
Register (70 FR 15086).
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, 
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a 
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1233.

0
2. Revise Sec.  100.734 to read as follows:


Sec.  100.734   Special Local Regulation; Gasparilla Marine Parade; 
Hillsborough Bay; Tampa, FL.

    (a) Regulated area. A regulated area is established consisting of 
the following waters of Hillsborough Bay and its tributaries north of 
27[deg]51'18'' N and south of the John F. Kennedy Bridge: Hillsborough 
Cut ``D'' Channel, Seddon Channel, Sparkman Channel and the 
Hillsborough River south of the John F. Kennedy Bridge. All coordinates 
referenced use datum: NAD 83.
    (b) Regulations. (1) Entrance into the regulated area is prohibited 
to all commercial marine traffic from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. EST on the day 
of the event.
    (2) The regulated area will include a 100 yard Safety Zone around 
the vessel JOSE GASPAR while docked at the Tampa Yacht Club until 6 
p.m. EST on the day of the event.
    (3) The regulated area is a ``no wake'' zone.
    (4) All vessels within the regulated area shall stay 50 feet away 
from and give way to all officially entered vessels in parade formation 
in the Gasparilla Marine Parade.
    (5) When within the marked channels of the parade route, vessels 
participating in the Gasparilla Marine Parade may not exceed the 
minimum speed necessary to maintain steerage.
    (6) Jet skis and vessels without mechanical propulsion are 
prohibited from the parade route.
    (7) Vessels less than 10 feet in length are prohibited from the 
parade route unless capable of safely participating.
    (8) Vessels found to be unsafe to participate at the discretion of 
a present Law Enforcement Officer are prohibited from the parade route.
    (9) Northbound vessels in excess of 65 feet in length without 
mooring arrangement made prior to the date of the event are prohibited 
from entering Seddon Channel unless the vessel is officially entered in 
the Gasparilla Marine Parade.
    (10) Vessels not officially entered in the Gasparilla Marine Parade 
may not enter the parade staging area box within the following 
coordinates: 27[deg]53'53'' N, 082[deg]27'47'' W; 27[deg]53'22'' N, 
082[deg]27'10'' W; 27[deg]52'36'' N, 082[deg]27'55'' W; 27[deg]53'02'' 
N, 082[deg]28'31'' W.
    (c) Enforcement period. This rule will be enforced from 9 a.m. to 6 
p.m. annually on the last Saturday in January.

Holly L. Najarian,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Saint Petersburg.
[FR Doc. 2017-26830 Filed 12-12-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
58578 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules

order is to be issued, and (2) the date federalism implications to warrant the DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
that notice of the proposed temporary preparation of a Federalism Assessment. SECURITY
scheduling order is transmitted to the
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308 Coast Guard
Assistant Secretary of HHS. 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(1). Administrative practice and
Inasmuch as section 201(h) of the procedure, Drug traffic control, 33 CFR Part 100
CSA directs that temporary scheduling Reporting and recordkeeping [Docket Number USCG–2017–0332]
actions be issued by order and sets forth requirements.
the procedures by which such orders are RIN 1625–AA08
For the reasons set out above, the DEA
to be issued, the DEA believes that the proposes to amend 21 CFR part 1308 as Special Local Regulation; Gasparilla
notice and comment requirements of follows: Marine Parade; Hillsborough Bay;
section 553 of the Administrative
Tampa, FL
Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553, do PART 1308—SCHEDULES OF
not apply to this notice of intent. In the CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
alternative, even assuming that this ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
notice of intent might be subject to ■ 1. The authority citation for part 1308
section 553 of the APA, the continues to read as follows: SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
Administrator finds that there is good Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b), establishing a special local regulation
cause to forgo the notice and comment unless otherwise noted. for the annual Gasparilla Marine Parade
requirements of section 553, as any ■ 2. In § 1308.11, add paragraphs (h)(23) on the waters of Hillsborough Bay in the
further delays in the process for through (29) to read as follows: vicinity of Tampa, Florida. This event is
issuance of temporary scheduling orders expected to attract over 600 spectator
would be impracticable and contrary to § 1308.11 Schedule I. craft along the parade route, with
the public interest in view of the * * * * * approximately 18 vessels participating
manifest urgency to avoid an imminent (h) * * * in the official flotilla. The parade is
hazard to the public safety. (23) N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)-N- scheduled to take place annually on the
Although the DEA believes this notice phenylpentanamide, its isomers, esters, last Saturday in January. This regulation
of intent to issue a temporary ethers, salts and salts of isomers, esters is necessary to ensure the safety of
scheduling order is not subject to the and ethers (Other name: valeryl public, the official flotilla, and spectator
notice and comment requirements of fentanyl) . . . (9804) vessels before, during, and after the
section 553 of the APA, the DEA notes (24) N-(4-fluorophenyl)-N-(1- conclusion of the parade.
that in accordance with 21 U.S.C. phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)butyramide, its DATES: Comments and related material
811(h)(4), the Administrator took into isomers, esters, ethers, salts and salts of must be received by the Coast Guard on
consideration comments submitted by isomers, esters and ethers (Other name: or before January 12, 2018.
the Assistant Secretary in response to para-fluorobutyryl fentanyl) . . . (9823) ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
notice that DEA transmitted to the (25) N-(4-methoxyphenyl)-N-(1- identified by docket number USCG–
Assistant Secretary pursuant to section phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)butyramide, its 2017–0332 using the Federal
811(h)(4). isomers, esters, ethers, salts and salts of eRulemaking Portal at http://
Further, the DEA believes that this isomers, esters and ethers (Other name: www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
temporary scheduling action is not a para-methoxybutyryl fentanyl) . . . Participation and Request for
‘‘rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 601(2), (9837) Comments’’ portion of the
and, accordingly, is not subject to the (26) N-(4-chlorophenyl)-N-(1- SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
requirements of the Regulatory phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)isobutyramide, further instructions on submitting
Flexibility Act (RFA). The requirements its isomers, esters, ethers, salts and salts comments.
for the preparation of an initial of isomers, esters and ethers (Other
regulatory flexibility analysis in 5 U.S.C. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
name: para-chloroisobutyryl fentanyl)
603(a) are not applicable where, as here, you have questions about this proposed
. . . (9826)
the DEA is not required by section 553 rulemaking, call or email Marine
(27) N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)-N- Science Technician First Class Michael
of the APA or any other law to publish phenylisobutyramide, its isomers,
a general notice of proposed D. Shackleford, Sector St. Petersburg
esters, ethers, salts and salts of isomers, Prevention Department, Coast Guard;
rulemaking. esters and ethers (Other name:
Additionally, this action is not a telephone (813)228–2191, email
isobutyryl fentanyl) . . . (9827) Michael.D.Shackleford@uscg.mil.
significant regulatory action as defined (28) N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)-N-
by Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
phenylcyclopentanecarboxamide, its
Planning and Review), section 3(f), and, isomers, esters, ethers, salts and salts of I. Table of Abbreviations
accordingly, this action has not been isomers, esters and ethers (Other name:
reviewed by the Office of Management CFR Code of Federal Regulations
cyclopentyl fentanyl) . . . (9847) DHS Department of Homeland Security
and Budget. (29) N-(2-fluorophenyl)-2-methoxy-N- FR Federal Register
This action will not have substantial (1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)acetamide, NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
direct effects on the States, on the
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS

its isomers, esters, ethers, salts and salts Pub. L. Public Law
relationship between the national of isomers, esters and ethers (Other § Section
government and the States, or on the name: ocfentanil) . . . (9832) U.S.C. United States Code
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various Dated: December 5, 2017. II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
levels of government. Therefore, in Robert W. Patterson, Basis
accordance with Executive Order 13132 Acting Administrator. The Coast Guard proposes to establish
(Federalism) it is determined that this [FR Doc. 2017–26854 Filed 12–12–17; 8:45 am] a special local regulation on the waters
action does not have sufficient BILLING CODE 4410–09–P of the Hillsborough Bay, Tampa, Florida

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:09 Dec 12, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM 13DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules 58579

during the annual Gasparilla Marine flexibility. This NPRM has not been Under section 213(a) of the Small
Parade. This event is expected to attract designated a ‘‘significant regulatory Business Regulatory Enforcement
over 600 spectator craft along the parade action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
route, with approximately 18 vessels Accordingly, the NPRM has not been we want to assist small entities in
participating in the official flotilla. The reviewed by the Office of Management understanding this proposed rule. If the
parade is scheduled to take place and Budget. rule would affect your small business,
annually on the last Saturday in The economic impact of this rule is organization, or governmental
January. This proposed rulemaking is not significant for the following reasons: jurisdiction and you have questions
necessary to ensure the safety of public, (1) The special local regulation will be concerning its provisions or options for
the official flotilla, and spectator vessels enforced for only nine hours; (2) compliance, please contact the person
on these navigable waters of the United although certain persons and vessels are listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
States during the Annual Gasparilla prohibited to enter, transit through, CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
Marine Parade. The Coast Guard anchor in, or remain within the not retaliate against small entities that
proposes this rulemaking under regulated area without authorization question or complain about this
authority in 33 U.S.C. 1233. from the Captain of the Port St. proposed rule or any policy or action of
Petersburg or a designated the Coast Guard.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule representative, they may operate in the
This rule establishes a temporary surrounding area during the C. Collection of Information
special local regulation for the enforcement period; (3) the Coast Guard This proposed rule would not call for
Gasparilla Marine Parade on the waters will provide advance notification of the a new collection of information under
of Hillsborough Bay in Tampa, Florida special local regulations to the local the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
annually on the last saturday in January. maritime community by Local Notice to (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
This special regulation sets forth Mariners and/or Broadcast Notice to
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
specific requirements for vessels Mariners; and (4) persons and vessels
Governments
operating within the regulated area not meeting the requirements of this
during the period of enforcement. regulation may request authorization to A rule has implications for federalism
Persons and vessels not meeting the enter, transit through, anchor in, or under Executive Order 13132,
requirements of this regulation may remain within the regulated area by Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
request authorization to enter, transit contacting the Captain of the Port or a effect on the States, on the relationship
through, anchor in, or remain within the designated representative. between the national government and
regulated area by contacting the Captain the States, or on the distribution of
B. Impact on Small Entities power and responsibilities among the
of the Port St. Petersburg by telephone
at (727) 824–7506, or a designated The Regulatory Flexibility Act of various levels of government. We have
representative via VHF radio on channel 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, analyzed this proposed rule under that
16. If authorization to enter, transit requires Federal agencies to consider Order and have determined that it is
through, anchor in, or remain within the the potential impact of regulations on consistent with the fundamental
regulated area is granted by the Captain small entities during rulemaking. The federalism principles and preemption
of the Port St. Petersburg or a designated term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small requirements described in Executive
representative, all persons and vessels businesses, not-for-profit organizations Order 13132.
receiving such authorization must that are independently owned and Also, this proposed rule does not have
comply with the instructions of the operated and are not dominant in their tribal implications under Executive
Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a fields, and governmental jurisdictions Order 13175, Consultation and
designated representative. The Coast with populations of less than 50,000. Coordination with Indian Tribal
Guard will provide notice of the special The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. Governments, because it would not have
local regulations by Local Notice to 605(b) that this proposed rule would not a substantial direct effect on one or
Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, have a significant economic impact on more Indian tribes, on the relationship
and/or on-scene designated a substantial number of small entities. between the Federal Government and
representatives. This rule may affect the following Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
entities, some of which may be small power and responsibilities between the
IV. Regulatory Analyses entities: The owners or operators of Federal Government and Indian tribes.
We developed this proposed rule after vessels intending to enter, transit If you believe this proposed rule has
considering numerous statutes and through, anchor in, or remain within implications for federalism or Indian
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. that portion of Hillsborough Bay, tribes, please contact the person listed
Below we summarize our analyses Tampa, FL, encompassed within the in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
based on a number of these statutes and special local regulation annually on the CONTACT section above.
Executive Orders, and we discuss First last saturday in January. For the reasons
stated in section IV.A above, this rule E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Amendment rights of protestors.
will not have a significant economic The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
A. Regulatory Planning and Review impact on a substantial number of small of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 entities. Federal agencies to assess the effects of
direct agencies to assess the costs and If you think that your business, their discretionary regulatory actions. In
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS

benefits of available regulatory organization, or governmental particular, the Act addresses actions
alternatives and, if regulation is jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity that may result in the expenditure by a
necessary, to select regulatory and that this rule would have a State, local, or tribal government, in the
approaches that maximize net benefits. significant economic impact on it, aggregate, or by the private sector of
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the please submit a comment (see $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
importance of quantifying both costs ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it more in any one year. Though this
and benefits, of reducing costs, of qualifies and how and to what degree proposed rule would not result in such
harmonizing rules, and of promoting this rule would economically affect it. an expenditure, we do discuss the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:09 Dec 12, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM 13DEP1
Document Created: 2017-12-13 01:23:58
Document Modified: 2017-12-13 01:23:58
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before January 12, 2018.
Contact		If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Marine Science Technician First Class Michael D. Shackleford, Sector St. Petersburg Prevention Department, Coast Guard; telephone (813)228-2191, email [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 58578
RIN Number		1625-AA08
CFR Associated		Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Waterways