82_FR_60412 82 FR 60170 - Fisheries Off West Coast States; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan; Authorization of an Oregon Recreational Fishery for Midwater Groundfish Species

82 FR 60170 - Fisheries Off West Coast States; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan; Authorization of an Oregon Recreational Fishery for Midwater Groundfish Species

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 242 (December 19, 2017)

Page Range60170-60172
FR Document2017-27282

This proposed rule would authorize the use of midwater long- leader gear for recreational fishing in waters seaward of a boundary line approximating the 40 fathoms depth contour off the coast of Oregon. Midwater long-leader gear would be allowed for both charter and private vessels seaward of the 40 fathom seasonal depth closure and monitored with the existing Oregon Ocean Recreational Boat Sampling (ORBS) program. The use of this long-leader gear is intended to aid in limiting bycatch of overfished and rebuilding rockfish species, such as bottom-dwelling yelloweye rockfish, while still allowing for the catch of abundant midwater species such as yellowtail and widow rockfish. The season would be limited and occur between the months of April and September, months currently subject to depth restrictions.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 242 (Tuesday, December 19, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 19, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60170-60172]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27282]



[[Page 60170]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 660

[Docket No. 161024999-7999-01]
RIN 0648-BG40


Fisheries Off West Coast States; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery 
Management Plan; Authorization of an Oregon Recreational Fishery for 
Midwater Groundfish Species

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This proposed rule would authorize the use of midwater long-
leader gear for recreational fishing in waters seaward of a boundary 
line approximating the 40 fathoms depth contour off the coast of 
Oregon. Midwater long-leader gear would be allowed for both charter and 
private vessels seaward of the 40 fathom seasonal depth closure and 
monitored with the existing Oregon Ocean Recreational Boat Sampling 
(ORBS) program. The use of this long-leader gear is intended to aid in 
limiting bycatch of overfished and rebuilding rockfish species, such as 
bottom-dwelling yelloweye rockfish, while still allowing for the catch 
of abundant midwater species such as yellowtail and widow rockfish. The 
season would be limited and occur between the months of April and 
September, months currently subject to depth restrictions.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received by January 18, 
2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments on this document, identified by NOAA-
NMFS-2017-0047, by either of the following methods:
     Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public 
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to 
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2017-0047, click the 
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or 
attach your comments.
     Mail: Submit written comments to Barry Thom, Regional 
Administrator, West Coast Region, NMFS, 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 
1100, Portland, OR 97232; Attn: Christopher Biegel.
    Instructions: NMFS may not consider comments if they are sent by 
any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after 
the end of the comment period. All comments received are a part of the 
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on 
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying 
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business 
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily 
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous 
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain 
anonymous).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Biegel, phone: 503-231-
6291, fax: 503-872-2737, or email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic Access

    This proposed rule is accessible via the internet at the Office of 
the Federal Register website at https://www.federalregister.gov. 
Background information and documents are available at the NMFS West 
Coast Region website at http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/fisheries/groundfish/index.html and at the Pacific Fishery Management 
Council's website at http://www.pcouncil.org.

Background

    On the West Coast, recreational fisheries primarily occur in non-
federal waters (zero to three nautical miles off the coast) and are 
managed by the states of Washington, Oregon, and California. Inter-
state coordination is facilitated through the Pacific States Marine 
Fisheries Commission (PSMFC). The Pacific Fishery Management Council 
(Council) and NMFS manage and regulate fisheries that occur within 
federal waters (three to 200 nautical miles off the coast). 
Recreational groundfish fisheries are primarily managed with time/area 
closures, size restrictions, and bag limits. Fishing participation and 
effort in Oregon recreational fisheries varies seasonally and 
geographically with participation highest during warmer months.
    There are more than 90 species of groundfish managed under the 
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan, including over 60 
species of rockfish in the family Scorpaenidae, seven roundfish 
species, 12 flatfish species, assorted shark species, all endemic skate 
species, all endemic grenadier species, and a few miscellaneous bottom-
dwelling marine fish species. Groundfish species occur throughout the 
Federal Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) off the coast of Oregon and 
within state waters, occupying diverse habitats at all stages in their 
life history.
    The area affected by the proposed rule is the recreational 
groundfish fishing grounds within the west coast EEZ, from 3 to 200 
nautical miles off the coast of Oregon. Groundfish fishing is largely 
confined to depths of 30 fathoms or less, approximately 30 miles or 
less off the coast. Federally-managed recreational groundfish fishing 
that could be directly affected by the proposed action occurs in 
Federal waters seaward of 40 fathoms off the Oregon coast (42 [deg]00' 
N lat. to 46 [deg]18' N lat.). For the period 2011-2015, anglers fished 
on approximately 84,405 trips per year for bottomfish (groundfish) in 
Oregon waters. This represents the largest single recreational ocean 
fishery in Oregon, representing about 44 percent of the total effort 
over that time period.
    Since 2004, the Oregon recreational groundfish fisheries have been 
restricted to shallow depths (less than 20-40 fm) during the peak 
effort and catch months to reduce interactions with deeper water 
species, especially yelloweye rockfish. The recreational groundfish 
fisheries are an important part of the local economy and social fabric 
in Oregon's coastal communities, and the implementation of deep-water 
rockfish closures in 2004 left several ports without any viable 
groundfish fishing opportunities. In an effort to increase recreational 
fishing opportunities in these ports, and relieve some pressure from 
nearshore reefs, exempted fishing permits (EFP) were issued to test the 
viability of long-leader gear. EFP test fishing, conducted by the 
Oregon Recreational Fishing Alliance in cooperation with the Oregon 
Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), began in 2009 and was completed 
by 2011. Based in part on favorable EFP test fishing results using 
midwater long-leader gear on Oregon sport charter fishing vessels, the 
Council in 2015 requested that regulations authorizing a midwater long-
leader fishery off of Oregon be created.
    Under the proposed rule, midwater long-leader recreational 
groundfish fishing would be authorized seaward of a line approximating 
the 40 fathom depth curve exclusively off the coast of Oregon (42 
[deg]00' N lat. to 46 [deg]18' N lat.) from April-September to target 
abundant and healthy midwater species while avoiding or minimizing 
interactions with overfished rockfish species. The gear configuration 
would include one fishing line, deployed with a sinker and no more than 
three hooks, with a minimum of 30 feet (9.14 meters) between the sinker 
and the lowest hook, and a non-compressible float attached to the line 
above the hooks. The gear may

[[Page 60171]]

be equipped with artificial lures and flies not to exceed 5 inches in 
length. Natural bait, and lures or flies greater than 5 inches in 
length, may not be used. Further, lingcod retention would be 
prohibited. All other existing state and Federal groundfish 
regulations, such as bag limits, rockfish conservation areas, etc., 
would remain in effect. This alternative would be monitored with the 
existing Oregon ORBS program.
    The Council approved language in the definition of long-leader gear 
that included a prohibition on ``large lures'' but did not include a 
definition. After consultation with ODFW, this rule is proposing that 
``large lure'' be defined as over five inches in length. This 
definition is based on industry standard lure sizes commonly used in 
the recreational fishery. Public comment is being requested on this 
definition.

Classification

    Pursuant to section 304 (b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, 16 
U.S.C. 1854(b)(1)(A), NMFS Acting Assistant Administrator has 
determined that this proposed rule is consistent with the Pacific Coast 
Groundfish Fishery Management Plan, other provisions of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, and other applicable law, subject to further consideration 
after public comment.
    This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for 
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
    An initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as 
required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The 
IRFA describes the economic impact this proposed rule, if adopted, 
would have on small entities. When an agency proposes regulations, the 
RFA, 5 U.S.C. 603 et seq., requires the agency to prepare and make 
available for public comment an IRFA that describes the impact on small 
businesses, non-profit enterprises, local governments, and other small 
entities. The IRFA is to aid the agency in considering all reasonable 
regulatory alternatives that would minimize the economic impact on 
affected small entities. A copy of the IRFA is available from NMFS (see 
ADDRESSES). A summary of the analysis follows.
    A description of the action, why it is being considered, and the 
legal basis for this action are contained in the Background section of 
the preamble and in the SUMMARY section of the preamble.

Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the 
Rule Applies

    The RFA, 5 U.S.C. 603 et seq., requires government agencies to 
assess the effects that regulatory alternatives would have on small 
entities. For marinas and charter/party boats, a small business is 
defined as any business/organization independently owned and operated, 
not dominant in its field of operation (including its affiliates), with 
annual receipts not in excess of $7.5 million.
    An estimated 104 recreational charter entities targeted groundfish 
in Oregon in 2014. Each of these vessels had an estimated average 
revenue of $35,743 from groundfish, from a total annual average revenue 
of $116,453, with other significant revenue earned in the salmon, tuna/
albacore, and shellfish fisheries. It is estimated that all 104 
entities would be considered small entities under the RFA.
    In 2015 there were 106,504 angler trips in the Oregon recreational 
groundfish fisheries. This accounted for $14,225,329 in trip-related 
expenses (excludes durable goods) and 327 jobs in the state of Oregon. 
Recreational anglers are not considered small entities under the RFA.
    Many charter operations in Oregon earn a majority of their revenue 
from salmon fishing, however given the natural variability of the 
salmon fishery year to year, there is a potential for more commercial 
charter operations to turn to groundfish if the salmon fishery 
declines.

Estimate of Economic Impacts on Small Entities, by Entity Size and 
Industry

    This rule is expected to give recreational charter entities in 
Oregon increased flexibility to pursue groundfish fishing 
opportunities, which is expected to provide positive economic impacts. 
The rule does not limit any existing activity or impose any mandatory 
new costs on the fleet, so the overall benefit to small entities is 
expected to be slightly positive, as some or most vessels may not 
choose to participate in the midwater fishery due to increased fuel 
costs from the distance required to travel, and because of midwater 
gear requirements. If charter operations choose to supplement 
groundfish in low-salmon years, benefits to these small entities would 
increase.

Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements

    There are no new reporting and recordkeeping requirements 
associated with this rule.

Relevant Federal Rules That May Duplicate, Overlap or Conflict With the 
Proposed Action

    There are no relevant Federal rules that may duplicate, overlap, or 
conflict with this action.

A Description of any Significant Alternatives to the Proposed Rule That 
Accomplish the Stated Objectives of Applicable Statutes and That 
Minimize Any Significant Economic Impact of the Proposed Rule on Small 
Entities

    NMFS prepared, and the Council reviewed, a preliminary draft 
Environmental Assessment (EA) prior to recommending NMFS move forward 
with promulgating this rule.\1\ NMFS is making available a draft EA 
simultaneous with the publication of this proposed rule in the Federal 
Register.\2\ The preliminary and draft EA analyzed three alternatives 
in addition to a no action alternative. Of those analyzed, the 
Council's preferred alternative was the only one that accomplished the 
stated objectives of creating fishing opportunities while limiting 
bycatch of overfished and rebuilding rockfish species, such as bottom-
dwelling yelloweye rockfish, and still allowing for the catch of 
abundant midwater species. In addition, the Council's preferred 
alternative would provide the largest potential positive impact to 
small business entities. In addition to those analyzed, a number of 
other alternatives to the proposed action were considered, but 
ultimately rejected for the purposes of further analysis in the draft 
EA. For example, an alternative that would reduce the number of months 
open for the fishery was considered and rejected. Further, an 
alternative to establish a midwater long-leader recreational groundfish 
fishery in California waters was considered, but then eliminated from 
further analysis after the California Department of Fish and Wildlife 
(CDFW) expressed concerns regarding the monitoring, enforcement, and 
funding challenges associated with establishing a new fishery in 
California waters. Additionally, there has been very little EFP test 
fishing of the midwater long-leader recreational gear in California 
waters. CDFW argued that until robust observer-verified data exist, 
this potential alternative presents too high a risk to include in the 
suite of alternatives under consideration.

[[Page 60172]]

Because of these issues, CDFW withdrew their interest in participating 
in the fishery.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Available at: http://www.pcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/G5_Att1_DraftEA_ORmidwaterSport_MAR2016BB.pdf.
    \2\ Available at: http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/publications/nepa/groundfish/groundfish_nepa_documents.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    An alternative to establish a midwater long-leader recreational 
groundfish fishery in Oregon waters for only the sport charter vessel 
fleet was considered by the Council, as that fleet could carry 
observers on board the vessels to collect data on interactions with 
prohibited and constraining species. It was noted that no current 
program exists for placing observers on private recreational vessels, 
and such a program would require additional analyses and consideration. 
The Council decided not to recommend this alternative for further 
analysis due in part to ODFW policy regarding sector separation and the 
goal of preserving equality in managing sport recreational fisheries 
modes in Oregon.
    The Council considered an alternative allowing retention of all 
groundfish species, including lingcod. However, the Council did not 
recommend further analysis of this alternative given concerns about the 
increased potential for yelloweye rockfish bycatch should anglers 
choose to target more bottom-dwelling species, like lingcod.
    The Council considered recommending additional monitoring and 
reporting requirements for anglers fishing in deep waters with the 
long-leader gear. However, ODFW regards the current sampling rate of 
the ORBS monitoring program (which includes angler-reported discard 
estimates by species and area) to be sufficient for adequately covering 
new activities under the proposed action.
    Finally, the Council considered allowing the fishery to operate 
seaward of 30 fathoms but did not make that part of their recommended 
alternatives for further analysis. This decision was based in part on 
input from law enforcement that a 10 fathom buffer zone (i.e., fishing 
seaward of 40 fathom enforceable depth contour) would be preferred to 
allow for effective and efficient enforcement when using depth-based 
regulations.
    NMFS believes that rule will not have a significant impact on small 
businesses. An estimated 104 small entities are potentially impacted by 
this rule. This rule is not anticipated to have a substantial or 
significant economic impact on small entities, or place small entities 
at a disadvantage to large entities. We are requesting comments on this 
conclusion.

List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660

    Fisheries, Fishing, and Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: December 14, 2017.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
    For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is 
proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 660--FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES

0
1. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq., and 16 
U.S.C. 7001 et seq.

0
2. In Sec.  660.351, add, in alphabetical order, the definition of 
``long-leader gear'' as follows:


Sec.  660.351  Recreational fishery--definitions.

* * * * *
    Long-leader gear (also known as Holloway gear) means fishing gear 
with the following: one fishing line, deployed with a sinker and no 
more than three hooks, with a minimum of 30 feet (9.14 meters) between 
the sinker and the lowest hook, and a non-compressible float attached 
to the line above the hooks. The gear may be equipped with artificial 
lures and flies not to exceed 5 inches in length. Natural bait, and 
lures or flies greater than 5 inches in length, may not be used.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec.  660.360, paragraphs (c)(2)(i)(B) and (c)(2)(iii)(B) are 
revised to read as follows:


Sec.  660.360  Recreational fishery--management measures.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) Recreational rockfish conservation area (RCA). Fishing for 
groundfish with recreational gear is prohibited within the recreational 
RCA, a type of closed area or groundfish conservation area. It is 
unlawful to take and retain, possess, or land groundfish taken with 
recreational gear within the recreational RCA. A vessel fishing in the 
recreational RCA may not be in possession of any groundfish. [For 
example, if a vessel fishes in the recreational salmon fishery within 
the RCA, the vessel cannot be in possession of groundfish while within 
the RCA. The vessel may, however, on the same trip fish for and retain 
groundfish shoreward of the RCA on the return trip to port.] Off 
Oregon, from April 1 through September 30, recreational fishing for 
groundfish is prohibited seaward of a recreational RCA boundary line 
approximating the 40 fm (73 m) depth contour, except that fishing for 
flatfish (other than Pacific halibut) is allowed seaward of the 40 fm 
(73 m) depth contour when recreational fishing for groundfish is 
permitted, and fishing with long-leader gear (as defined in Sec.  
660.351) is allowed seaward of the 40 fm (73 m) depth contour (i.e., 
within the RCA) from April 1 through September 30. Coordinates for the 
boundary line approximating the 40 fm (73 m) depth contour are listed 
at Sec.  660.71.
* * * * *
    (iii) * * *
    (B) Lingcod. There is a 3 fish limit per day for lingcod from 
January 1 through December 31. The minimum size for lingcod retained in 
the Oregon recreational fishery is 22 in (56 cm) total length. For 
vessels using long-leader gear (as defined in Sec.  660.351) and 
fishing inside the recreational RCA, possession of lingcod is 
prohibited.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-27282 Filed 12-18-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P



                                                  60170                Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 19, 2017 / Proposed Rules

                                                  DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                  the comment period. All comments                      occupying diverse habitats at all stages
                                                                                                          received are a part of the public record              in their life history.
                                                  National Oceanic and Atmospheric                        and will generally be posted for public                  The area affected by the proposed rule
                                                  Administration                                          viewing on www.regulations.gov                        is the recreational groundfish fishing
                                                                                                          without change. All personal identifying              grounds within the west coast EEZ, from
                                                  50 CFR Part 660                                         information (e.g., name, address, etc.),              3 to 200 nautical miles off the coast of
                                                                                                          confidential business information, or                 Oregon. Groundfish fishing is largely
                                                  [Docket No. 161024999–7999–01]
                                                                                                          otherwise sensitive information                       confined to depths of 30 fathoms or less,
                                                  RIN 0648–BG40                                           submitted voluntarily by the sender will              approximately 30 miles or less off the
                                                                                                          be publicly accessible. NMFS will                     coast. Federally-managed recreational
                                                  Fisheries Off West Coast States;                        accept anonymous comments (enter                      groundfish fishing that could be directly
                                                  Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery                        ‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish            affected by the proposed action occurs
                                                  Management Plan; Authorization of an                    to remain anonymous).                                 in Federal waters seaward of 40 fathoms
                                                  Oregon Recreational Fishery for
                                                                                                          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                                                                                off the Oregon coast (42 °00′ N lat. to 46
                                                  Midwater Groundfish Species
                                                                                                          Christopher Biegel, phone: 503–231–                   °18′ N lat.). For the period 2011–2015,
                                                  AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries                      6291, fax: 503–872–2737, or email:                    anglers fished on approximately 84,405
                                                  Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and                    Christopher.biegel@noaa.gov.                          trips per year for bottomfish
                                                  Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),                                                                            (groundfish) in Oregon waters. This
                                                                                                          SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                            represents the largest single recreational
                                                  Commerce.
                                                                                                          Electronic Access                                     ocean fishery in Oregon, representing
                                                  ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
                                                                                                                                                                about 44 percent of the total effort over
                                                  comments.                                                  This proposed rule is accessible via               that time period.
                                                                                                          the internet at the Office of the Federal                Since 2004, the Oregon recreational
                                                  SUMMARY:    This proposed rule would                    Register website at https://
                                                  authorize the use of midwater long-                                                                           groundfish fisheries have been restricted
                                                                                                          www.federalregister.gov. Background                   to shallow depths (less than 20–40 fm)
                                                  leader gear for recreational fishing in                 information and documents are
                                                  waters seaward of a boundary line                                                                             during the peak effort and catch months
                                                                                                          available at the NMFS West Coast                      to reduce interactions with deeper water
                                                  approximating the 40 fathoms depth                      Region website at http://
                                                  contour off the coast of Oregon.                                                                              species, especially yelloweye rockfish.
                                                                                                          www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/                     The recreational groundfish fisheries are
                                                  Midwater long-leader gear would be                      fisheries/groundfish/index.html and at
                                                  allowed for both charter and private                                                                          an important part of the local economy
                                                                                                          the Pacific Fishery Management                        and social fabric in Oregon’s coastal
                                                  vessels seaward of the 40 fathom                        Council’s website at http://
                                                  seasonal depth closure and monitored                                                                          communities, and the implementation
                                                                                                          www.pcouncil.org.                                     of deep-water rockfish closures in 2004
                                                  with the existing Oregon Ocean
                                                                                                          Background                                            left several ports without any viable
                                                  Recreational Boat Sampling (ORBS)
                                                                                                                                                                groundfish fishing opportunities. In an
                                                  program. The use of this long-leader                       On the West Coast, recreational                    effort to increase recreational fishing
                                                  gear is intended to aid in limiting                     fisheries primarily occur in non-federal              opportunities in these ports, and relieve
                                                  bycatch of overfished and rebuilding                    waters (zero to three nautical miles off              some pressure from nearshore reefs,
                                                  rockfish species, such as bottom-                       the coast) and are managed by the states              exempted fishing permits (EFP) were
                                                  dwelling yelloweye rockfish, while still                of Washington, Oregon, and California.                issued to test the viability of long-leader
                                                  allowing for the catch of abundant                      Inter-state coordination is facilitated               gear. EFP test fishing, conducted by the
                                                  midwater species such as yellowtail and                 through the Pacific States Marine                     Oregon Recreational Fishing Alliance in
                                                  widow rockfish. The season would be                     Fisheries Commission (PSMFC). The                     cooperation with the Oregon
                                                  limited and occur between the months                    Pacific Fishery Management Council                    Department of Fish and Wildlife
                                                  of April and September, months                          (Council) and NMFS manage and                         (ODFW), began in 2009 and was
                                                  currently subject to depth restrictions.                regulate fisheries that occur within                  completed by 2011. Based in part on
                                                  DATES: Comments on this proposed rule                   federal waters (three to 200 nautical                 favorable EFP test fishing results using
                                                  must be received by January 18, 2018.                   miles off the coast). Recreational                    midwater long-leader gear on Oregon
                                                  ADDRESSES: Submit your comments on                      groundfish fisheries are primarily                    sport charter fishing vessels, the Council
                                                  this document, identified by NOAA–                      managed with time/area closures, size                 in 2015 requested that regulations
                                                  NMFS–2017–0047, by either of the                        restrictions, and bag limits. Fishing                 authorizing a midwater long-leader
                                                  following methods:                                      participation and effort in Oregon                    fishery off of Oregon be created.
                                                     • Electronic Submissions: Submit all                 recreational fisheries varies seasonally                 Under the proposed rule, midwater
                                                  electronic public comments via the                      and geographically with participation                 long-leader recreational groundfish
                                                  Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to                      highest during warmer months.                         fishing would be authorized seaward of
                                                  www.regulations.gov/                                       There are more than 90 species of                  a line approximating the 40 fathom
                                                  #!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2017-                        groundfish managed under the Pacific                  depth curve exclusively off the coast of
                                                  0047, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,                  Coast Groundfish Fishery Management                   Oregon (42 °00′ N lat. to 46 °18′ N lat.)
                                                  complete the required fields, and enter                 Plan, including over 60 species of                    from April-September to target
                                                  or attach your comments.                                rockfish in the family Scorpaenidae,                  abundant and healthy midwater species
                                                     • Mail: Submit written comments to                   seven roundfish species, 12 flatfish                  while avoiding or minimizing
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                  Barry Thom, Regional Administrator,                     species, assorted shark species, all                  interactions with overfished rockfish
                                                  West Coast Region, NMFS, 1201 NE                        endemic skate species, all endemic                    species. The gear configuration would
                                                  Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100, Portland, OR                   grenadier species, and a few                          include one fishing line, deployed with
                                                  97232; Attn: Christopher Biegel.                        miscellaneous bottom-dwelling marine                  a sinker and no more than three hooks,
                                                     Instructions: NMFS may not consider                  fish species. Groundfish species occur                with a minimum of 30 feet (9.14 meters)
                                                  comments if they are sent by any other                  throughout the Federal Exclusive                      between the sinker and the lowest hook,
                                                  method, to any other address or                         Economic Zone (EEZ) off the coast of                  and a non-compressible float attached to
                                                  individual, or received after the end of                Oregon and within state waters,                       the line above the hooks. The gear may


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:10 Dec 18, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00045   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM   19DEP1


                                                                       Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 19, 2017 / Proposed Rules                                                 60171

                                                  be equipped with artificial lures and                   the effects that regulatory alternatives              Relevant Federal Rules That May
                                                  flies not to exceed 5 inches in length.                 would have on small entities. For                     Duplicate, Overlap or Conflict With the
                                                  Natural bait, and lures or flies greater                marinas and charter/party boats, a small              Proposed Action
                                                  than 5 inches in length, may not be                     business is defined as any business/                    There are no relevant Federal rules
                                                  used. Further, lingcod retention would                  organization independently owned and                  that may duplicate, overlap, or conflict
                                                  be prohibited. All other existing state                 operated, not dominant in its field of                with this action.
                                                  and Federal groundfish regulations,                     operation (including its affiliates), with
                                                  such as bag limits, rockfish conservation                                                                     A Description of any Significant
                                                                                                          annual receipts not in excess of $7.5
                                                  areas, etc., would remain in effect. This                                                                     Alternatives to the Proposed Rule That
                                                                                                          million.                                              Accomplish the Stated Objectives of
                                                  alternative would be monitored with the
                                                  existing Oregon ORBS program.                              An estimated 104 recreational charter              Applicable Statutes and That Minimize
                                                     The Council approved language in the                 entities targeted groundfish in Oregon in             Any Significant Economic Impact of the
                                                  definition of long-leader gear that                     2014. Each of these vessels had an                    Proposed Rule on Small Entities
                                                  included a prohibition on ‘‘large lures’’               estimated average revenue of $35,743                     NMFS prepared, and the Council
                                                  but did not include a definition. After                 from groundfish, from a total annual                  reviewed, a preliminary draft
                                                  consultation with ODFW, this rule is                    average revenue of $116,453, with other               Environmental Assessment (EA) prior to
                                                  proposing that ‘‘large lure’’ be defined                significant revenue earned in the                     recommending NMFS move forward
                                                  as over five inches in length. This                     salmon, tuna/albacore, and shellfish                  with promulgating this rule.1 NMFS is
                                                  definition is based on industry standard                fisheries. It is estimated that all 104               making available a draft EA
                                                  lure sizes commonly used in the                         entities would be considered small                    simultaneous with the publication of
                                                  recreational fishery. Public comment is                 entities under the RFA.                               this proposed rule in the Federal
                                                  being requested on this definition.                                                                           Register.2 The preliminary and draft EA
                                                                                                             In 2015 there were 106,504 angler
                                                  Classification                                                                                                analyzed three alternatives in addition
                                                                                                          trips in the Oregon recreational
                                                                                                                                                                to a no action alternative. Of those
                                                     Pursuant to section 304 (b)(1)(A) of                 groundfish fisheries. This accounted for
                                                                                                                                                                analyzed, the Council’s preferred
                                                  the Magnuson-Stevens Act, 16 U.S.C.                     $14,225,329 in trip-related expenses                  alternative was the only one that
                                                  1854(b)(1)(A), NMFS Acting Assistant                    (excludes durable goods) and 327 jobs                 accomplished the stated objectives of
                                                  Administrator has determined that this                  in the state of Oregon. Recreational                  creating fishing opportunities while
                                                  proposed rule is consistent with the                    anglers are not considered small entities             limiting bycatch of overfished and
                                                  Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery                        under the RFA.                                        rebuilding rockfish species, such as
                                                  Management Plan, other provisions of                       Many charter operations in Oregon                  bottom-dwelling yelloweye rockfish,
                                                  the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other                     earn a majority of their revenue from                 and still allowing for the catch of
                                                  applicable law, subject to further                      salmon fishing, however given the                     abundant midwater species. In addition,
                                                  consideration after public comment.                     natural variability of the salmon fishery             the Council’s preferred alternative
                                                     This proposed rule has been                                                                                would provide the largest potential
                                                  determined to be not significant for                    year to year, there is a potential for more
                                                                                                          commercial charter operations to turn to              positive impact to small business
                                                  purposes of Executive Order 12866.                                                                            entities. In addition to those analyzed,
                                                     An initial regulatory flexibility                    groundfish if the salmon fishery
                                                                                                                                                                a number of other alternatives to the
                                                  analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as                        declines.
                                                                                                                                                                proposed action were considered, but
                                                  required by section 603 of the                          Estimate of Economic Impacts on Small                 ultimately rejected for the purposes of
                                                  Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The                   Entities, by Entity Size and Industry                 further analysis in the draft EA. For
                                                  IRFA describes the economic impact                                                                            example, an alternative that would
                                                  this proposed rule, if adopted, would                      This rule is expected to give                      reduce the number of months open for
                                                  have on small entities. When an agency                  recreational charter entities in Oregon               the fishery was considered and rejected.
                                                  proposes regulations, the RFA, 5 U.S.C.                 increased flexibility to pursue                       Further, an alternative to establish a
                                                  603 et seq., requires the agency to                     groundfish fishing opportunities, which               midwater long-leader recreational
                                                  prepare and make available for public                   is expected to provide positive                       groundfish fishery in California waters
                                                  comment an IRFA that describes the                      economic impacts. The rule does not                   was considered, but then eliminated
                                                  impact on small businesses, non-profit                  limit any existing activity or impose any             from further analysis after the California
                                                  enterprises, local governments, and                     mandatory new costs on the fleet, so the              Department of Fish and Wildlife
                                                  other small entities. The IRFA is to aid                overall benefit to small entities is                  (CDFW) expressed concerns regarding
                                                  the agency in considering all reasonable                                                                      the monitoring, enforcement, and
                                                                                                          expected to be slightly positive, as some
                                                  regulatory alternatives that would                                                                            funding challenges associated with
                                                                                                          or most vessels may not choose to
                                                  minimize the economic impact on                                                                               establishing a new fishery in California
                                                  affected small entities. A copy of the                  participate in the midwater fishery due
                                                                                                          to increased fuel costs from the distance             waters. Additionally, there has been
                                                  IRFA is available from NMFS (see                                                                              very little EFP test fishing of the
                                                  ADDRESSES). A summary of the analysis                   required to travel, and because of
                                                                                                                                                                midwater long-leader recreational gear
                                                  follows.                                                midwater gear requirements. If charter                in California waters. CDFW argued that
                                                     A description of the action, why it is               operations choose to supplement                       until robust observer-verified data exist,
                                                  being considered, and the legal basis for               groundfish in low-salmon years,                       this potential alternative presents too
                                                                                                          benefits to these small entities would
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                  this action are contained in the                                                                              high a risk to include in the suite of
                                                  Background section of the preamble and                  increase.                                             alternatives under consideration.
                                                  in the SUMMARY section of the preamble.
                                                                                                          Reporting and Recordkeeping                             1 Available at: http://www.pcouncil.org/wp-
                                                  Description and Estimate of the Number                  Requirements                                          content/uploads/2016/02/G5_Att1_DraftEA_
                                                  of Small Entities to Which the Rule                                                                           ORmidwaterSport_MAR2016BB.pdf.
                                                  Applies                                                   There are no new reporting and                        2 Available at: http://

                                                                                                          recordkeeping requirements associated                 www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/publications/
                                                    The RFA, 5 U.S.C. 603 et seq.,                                                                              nepa/groundfish/groundfish_nepa_
                                                                                                          with this rule.
                                                  requires government agencies to assess                                                                        documents.html.



                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:10 Dec 18, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00046   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM   19DEP1


                                                  60172                Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 19, 2017 / Proposed Rules

                                                  Because of these issues, CDFW                           businesses. An estimated 104 small                       (c) * * *
                                                  withdrew their interest in participating                entities are potentially impacted by this                (2) * * *
                                                  in the fishery.                                         rule. This rule is not anticipated to have
                                                     An alternative to establish a midwater               a substantial or significant economic                    (i) * * *
                                                  long-leader recreational groundfish                     impact on small entities, or place small                 (B) Recreational rockfish conservation
                                                  fishery in Oregon waters for only the                   entities at a disadvantage to large                   area (RCA). Fishing for groundfish with
                                                  sport charter vessel fleet was considered               entities. We are requesting comments on               recreational gear is prohibited within
                                                  by the Council, as that fleet could carry               this conclusion.                                      the recreational RCA, a type of closed
                                                  observers on board the vessels to collect                                                                     area or groundfish conservation area. It
                                                  data on interactions with prohibited and                List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
                                                                                                                                                                is unlawful to take and retain, possess,
                                                  constraining species. It was noted that                   Fisheries, Fishing, and Reporting and               or land groundfish taken with
                                                  no current program exists for placing                   recordkeeping requirements.                           recreational gear within the recreational
                                                  observers on private recreational                         Dated: December 14, 2017.                           RCA. A vessel fishing in the recreational
                                                  vessels, and such a program would                       Samuel D. Rauch, III,                                 RCA may not be in possession of any
                                                  require additional analyses and                         Deputy Assistant Administrator for                    groundfish. [For example, if a vessel
                                                  consideration. The Council decided not                  Regulatory Programs, National Marine                  fishes in the recreational salmon fishery
                                                  to recommend this alternative for                       Fisheries Service.                                    within the RCA, the vessel cannot be in
                                                  further analysis due in part to ODFW                      For the reasons set out in the                      possession of groundfish while within
                                                  policy regarding sector separation and                  preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is proposed                 the RCA. The vessel may, however, on
                                                  the goal of preserving equality in                      to be amended as follows:                             the same trip fish for and retain
                                                  managing sport recreational fisheries
                                                  modes in Oregon.                                        PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST                           groundfish shoreward of the RCA on the
                                                     The Council considered an alternative                COAST STATES                                          return trip to port.] Off Oregon, from
                                                  allowing retention of all groundfish                                                                          April 1 through September 30,
                                                  species, including lingcod. However,                    ■ 1. The authority citation for part 660              recreational fishing for groundfish is
                                                  the Council did not recommend further                   continues to read as follows:                         prohibited seaward of a recreational
                                                  analysis of this alternative given                        Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C.        RCA boundary line approximating the
                                                  concerns about the increased potential                  773 et seq., and 16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.               40 fm (73 m) depth contour, except that
                                                  for yelloweye rockfish bycatch should                                                                         fishing for flatfish (other than Pacific
                                                                                                          ■ 2. In § 660.351, add, in alphabetical
                                                  anglers choose to target more bottom-                   order, the definition of ‘‘long-leader                halibut) is allowed seaward of the 40 fm
                                                  dwelling species, like lingcod.                         gear’’ as follows:                                    (73 m) depth contour when recreational
                                                     The Council considered                                                                                     fishing for groundfish is permitted, and
                                                  recommending additional monitoring                      § 660.351 Recreational fishery—                       fishing with long-leader gear (as defined
                                                  and reporting requirements for anglers                  definitions.                                          in § 660.351) is allowed seaward of the
                                                  fishing in deep waters with the long-                   *      *     *     *     *                            40 fm (73 m) depth contour (i.e., within
                                                  leader gear. However, ODFW regards the                     Long-leader gear (also known as                    the RCA) from April 1 through
                                                  current sampling rate of the ORBS                       Holloway gear) means fishing gear with                September 30. Coordinates for the
                                                  monitoring program (which includes                      the following: one fishing line, deployed             boundary line approximating the 40 fm
                                                  angler-reported discard estimates by                    with a sinker and no more than three                  (73 m) depth contour are listed at
                                                  species and area) to be sufficient for                  hooks, with a minimum of 30 feet (9.14                § 660.71.
                                                  adequately covering new activities                      meters) between the sinker and the
                                                  under the proposed action.                                                                                    *       *    *     *     *
                                                                                                          lowest hook, and a non-compressible
                                                     Finally, the Council considered                      float attached to the line above the                     (iii) * * *
                                                  allowing the fishery to operate seaward                 hooks. The gear may be equipped with                     (B) Lingcod. There is a 3 fish limit per
                                                  of 30 fathoms but did not make that part                artificial lures and flies not to exceed 5            day for lingcod from January 1 through
                                                  of their recommended alternatives for                   inches in length. Natural bait, and lures             December 31. The minimum size for
                                                  further analysis. This decision was                     or flies greater than 5 inches in length,             lingcod retained in the Oregon
                                                  based in part on input from law                         may not be used.                                      recreational fishery is 22 in (56 cm) total
                                                  enforcement that a 10 fathom buffer                     *      *     *     *     *                            length. For vessels using long-leader
                                                  zone (i.e., fishing seaward of 40 fathom                ■ 3. In § 660.360, paragraphs (c)(2)(i)(B)            gear (as defined in § 660.351) and
                                                  enforceable depth contour) would be                     and (c)(2)(iii)(B) are revised to read as             fishing inside the recreational RCA,
                                                  preferred to allow for effective and                    follows:                                              possession of lingcod is prohibited.
                                                  efficient enforcement when using depth-
                                                  based regulations.                                      § 660.360 Recreational fishery—                       *       *    *     *     *
                                                     NMFS believes that rule will not have                management measures.                                  [FR Doc. 2017–27282 Filed 12–18–17; 8:45 am]
                                                  a significant impact on small                           *      *      *      *       *                        BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:10 Dec 18, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00047   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 9990   E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM   19DEP1



Document Created: 2017-12-19 01:31:05
Document Modified: 2017-12-19 01:31:05
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionProposed rule; request for comments.
DatesComments on this proposed rule must be received by January 18, 2018.
ContactChristopher Biegel, phone: 503-231- 6291, fax: 503-872-2737, or email: [email protected]
FR Citation82 FR 60170 
RIN Number0648-BG40
CFR AssociatedFisheries; Fishing and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR