82_FR_60456 82 FR 60214 - Certain Document Cameras and Software for Use Therewith; Commission's Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint

82 FR 60214 - Certain Document Cameras and Software for Use Therewith; Commission's Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 242 (December 19, 2017)

Page Range60214-60215
FR Document2017-27262

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 20) terminating the investigation based on withdrawal of the complaint.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 242 (Tuesday, December 19, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60214-60215]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27262]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1045]


Certain Document Cameras and Software for Use Therewith; 
Commission's Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination 
Terminating the Investigation Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 20) 
terminating the investigation based on withdrawal of the complaint.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Fisherow, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2737. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired

[[Page 60215]]

persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by 
contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on March 24, 2017, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Pathway 
Innovations and Technologies, Inc. (``Complainant'') of San Diego, 
California. 82 FR 15069-70 (March 24, 2017). The complaint alleges 
violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain document cameras and software for use 
therewith by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent 
No. 8,508,751. The complaint named IPEVO, Inc. of Sunnyvale, 
California; AVer Information Inc. of Fremont, California; and Lumens 
Integrations Inc. (``Lumens'') of Fremont, California as respondents. 
Lumens was previously terminated from the investigation.
    On November 21, 2017, Complainant filed an unopposed motion to 
terminate the investigation based on withdrawal of the complaint.
    On November 24, 2017, the ALJ issued an ID granting the unopposed 
motion. Order No. 20. The ALJ found that Complainant complied with 
Commission Rule 210.21. Specifically, the Complainant represented that 
there are no agreements, written or oral, express or implied concerning 
the subject matter of the investigation. The ALJ also found that 
termination of the investigation is not contrary to the public interest 
and there are no extraordinary circumstances that prevent termination 
of the investigation. No petitions for review were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: December 14, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-27262 Filed 12-18-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P



                                                60214                      Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 19, 2017 / Notices

                                                mechanically close the breach as soon                   tide gauges in Great South Bay will be                The hearing was held in Washington,
                                                as possible.                                            reviewed to identify changes in the tidal             DC, on October 12, 2017, and all
                                                   Alternative 2 (Status Determined                     prism, which could indicate a change in               persons who requested the opportunity
                                                Entirely by Natural Processes) is the no-               the breach conditions.                                were permitted to appear in person or
                                                action alternative and allows the                          Other changes made as a result of                  by counsel.
                                                management of the breach under natural                  comments consisted of clarifying text                   The Commission made these
                                                processes, to include evolution and                     added to the final Breach Plan/EIS that               determinations pursuant to section
                                                potential growth and/or natural closure.                did not substantively change the range                751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It
                                                   Alternative 3 (No Human Intervention                 of alternatives considered or the                     completed and filed its determinations
                                                unless Established Criteria are                         environmental consequences of                         in these reviews on December 13, 2017.
                                                Exceeded) is identified as the NPS                      implementing any of the alternatives.                 The views of the Commission are
                                                preferred alternative. This alternative                 Appendix C of the final Breach Plan/EIS               contained in USITC Publication 4746
                                                allows the evolution, growth, and/or                    discusses the comments received on the                (December 2017), entitled Multilayered
                                                closure of the breach to be determined                  draft Breach Plan/EIS and provides NPS                Wood Flooring from China:
                                                by natural barrier island processes, and                responses to substantive comments.                    Investigation Nos. 701–TA–476 and
                                                human intervention to close the breach                                                                        731–TA–1179 (Review).
                                                                                                          Dated: August 7, 2017.
                                                would occur only ‘‘to prevent loss of
                                                                                                        Cindy MacLeod,                                          By order of the Commission.
                                                life, flooding, and other severe
                                                economic and physical damage to the                     Acting Regional Director, Northeast Region,             Issued: December 13, 2017.
                                                Great South Bay and surrounding                         National Park Service.                                Lisa R. Barton,
                                                areas,’’ as allowed by the Otis Pike Fire                 Editorial note: This document was                   Secretary to the Commission.
                                                Island High Dune Wilderness Act.                        received for publication by the Office of the         [FR Doc. 2017–27242 Filed 12–18–17; 8:45 am]
                                                Monitoring data collected since 2012                    Federal Register on December 13, 2017.                BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
                                                and professional judgment of physical                   [FR Doc. 2017–27244 Filed 12–18–17; 8:45 am]
                                                scientists studying the breach have been                BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
                                                used to determine that the three criteria                                                                     INTERNATIONAL TRADE
                                                described below are the most logical                                                                          COMMISSION
                                                indicators to alert Seashore staff to
                                                                                                        INTERNATIONAL TRADE                                   [Investigation No. 337–TA–1045]
                                                changes in the breach that could elevate
                                                                                                        COMMISSION
                                                the risk of severe storm damage in the                                                                        Certain Document Cameras and
                                                form of loss of life, flooding, and other               [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–476 and 731–               Software for Use Therewith;
                                                severe economic and physical damage,                    TA–1179 (Review)]                                     Commission’s Determination Not To
                                                which could lead to a decision to close                                                                       Review an Initial Determination
                                                the breach under Alternative 3:                         Multilayered Wood Flooring From
                                                                                                                                                              Terminating the Investigation Based
                                                   • Criterion 1: Geologic Controls.                    China; Determinations
                                                                                                                                                              on Withdrawal of the Complaint
                                                Erosion-resistant clay to the east and                     On the basis of the record 1 developed
                                                west of the breach serve as geologic                                                                          AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
                                                                                                        in the subject five-year reviews, the
                                                controls for the breach. If the breach                                                                        Commission.
                                                                                                        United States International Trade
                                                migrates beyond these geologic controls,                Commission (‘‘Commission’’)                           ACTION: Notice.
                                                growth of the breach will be less                       determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
                                                predictable.                                                                                                  SUMMARY:    Notice is hereby given that
                                                                                                        1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the            the U.S. International Trade
                                                   • Criterion 2: Cross-Sectional Area.                 antidumping and countervailing duty
                                                Originally, the cross-sectional area of                                                                       Commission has determined not to
                                                                                                        orders on multilayered wood flooring                  review the presiding administrative law
                                                the breach increased rapidly; however,                  from China would be likely to lead to
                                                the breach has reached a dynamic                                                                              judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination
                                                                                                        continuation or recurrence of material                (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 20) terminating the
                                                equilibrium in which the cross-sectional                injury to an industry in the United
                                                area has fluctuated between 300 and 600                                                                       investigation based on withdrawal of
                                                                                                        States within a reasonably foreseeable                the complaint.
                                                square meters. A cross-sectional area                   time.
                                                within or below this range represents a                                                                       FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                condition in which the effects of the                   Background                                            Amanda Fisherow, Esq., Office of the
                                                breach are understood. An increase in                     The Commission, pursuant to section                 General Counsel, U.S. International
                                                cross-sectional area above this range                   751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)),                Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
                                                will indicate breach growth and a                       instituted these reviews on November 1,               Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
                                                condition in which the evolution of the                 2016 (81 FR 75854) and determined on                  205–2737. Copies of non-confidential
                                                breach is less predictable and impacts to               February 6, 2017 that it would conduct                documents filed in connection with this
                                                the surrounding areas may change.                       full reviews (82 FR 10588, February 14,               investigation are or will be available for
                                                   After reviewing and considering all                  2017). Notice of the scheduling of the                inspection during official business
                                                comments received on the draft Breach                   Commission’s reviews and of a public                  hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
                                                Plan/EIS, the NPS has prepared the final                hearing to be held in connection                      Office of the Secretary, U.S.
                                                Breach Plan/EIS. The final Breach Plan/                 therewith was given by posting copies                 International Trade Commission, 500 E
                                                EIS identifies Alternative 3 as the NPS                 of the notice in the Office of the                    Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
                                                                                                                                                              telephone (202) 205–2000. General
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                preferred alternative with one change                   Secretary, U.S. International Trade
                                                from the draft Breach Plan/EIS. The                     Commission, Washington, DC, and by                    information concerning the Commission
                                                description of alternative 3 was edited                 publishing the notice in the Federal                  may also be obtained by accessing its
                                                in the final Breach Plan/EIS to include                 Register on June 16, 2017 (82 FR 27722).              internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
                                                one additional criterion suggested by                                                                         The public record for this investigation
                                                commenters:                                               1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the     may be viewed on the Commission’s
                                                   • Criterion 3: Water Level as                        Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19      electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
                                                Measured by Tide Gauges. Data from                      CFR 207.2(f)).                                        edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:47 Dec 18, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00042   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM   19DEN1


                                                                           Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 19, 2017 / Notices                                            60215

                                                persons are advised that information on                 INTERNATIONAL TRADE                                   FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:       The
                                                this matter can be obtained by                          COMMISSION                                            Office of Docket Services, U.S.
                                                contacting the Commission’s TDD                                                                               International Trade Commission,
                                                                                                        [Investigation No. 337–TA–1090]                       telephone (202) 205–1802.
                                                terminal on (202) 205–1810.
                                                                                                        Certain Intraoral Scanners and Related                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:     The
                                                                                                        Hardware and Software Institution of                     Authority: The authority for
                                                Commission instituted this investigation                                                                      institution of this investigation is
                                                on March 24, 2017, based on a                           Investigation
                                                                                                                                                              contained in section 337 of the Tariff
                                                complaint filed on behalf of Pathway                    AGENCY: U.S. International Trade                      Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337
                                                Innovations and Technologies, Inc.                      Commission.                                           and in section 210.10 of the
                                                (‘‘Complainant’’) of San Diego,                         ACTION: Notice.                                       Commission’s Rules of Practice and
                                                California. 82 FR 15069–70 (March 24,                                                                         Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017).
                                                2017). The complaint alleges violations                 SUMMARY:    Notice is hereby given that a                Scope of Investigation: Having
                                                of section 337 based upon the                           complaint was filed with the U.S.                     considered the complaint, the U.S.
                                                importation into the United States, the                 International Trade Commission on                     International Trade Commission, on
                                                sale for importation, and the sale within               November 14, 2017, under section 337                  December 13, 2017, ordered that—
                                                the United States after importation of                  of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,                   (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
                                                certain document cameras and software                   on behalf of Align Technology, Inc. of                section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
                                                for use therewith by reason of                          San Jose, California. An amended                      amended, an investigation be instituted
                                                infringement of certain claims of U.S.                  complaint and supplement were filed                   to determine whether there is a
                                                Patent No. 8,508,751. The complaint                     on December 4, 2017. The amended                      violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
                                                named IPEVO, Inc. of Sunnyvale,                         complaint alleges violations of section               section 337 in the importation into the
                                                California; AVer Information Inc. of                    337 based upon the importation into the               United States, the sale for importation,
                                                Fremont, California; and Lumens                         United States, the sale for importation,              or the sale within the United States after
                                                Integrations Inc. (‘‘Lumens’’) of                       and the sale within the United States                 importation of certain intraoral scanners
                                                Fremont, California as respondents.                     after importation of certain intraoral                and related hardware and software by
                                                                                                        scanners and related hardware and                     reason of infringement of one or more of
                                                Lumens was previously terminated from
                                                                                                        software by reason of infringement of                 claims 1–7 and 15–20 of the ’901 patent;
                                                the investigation.
                                                                                                        one or more of U.S. Patent No. 9,615,901              claims 1–9 and 15–22 of the ’448 patent;
                                                   On November 21, 2017, Complainant                    (‘‘the ’901 patent’’); U.S. Patent No.                claims 1–7, 10, 12, and 17–24 of the
                                                filed an unopposed motion to terminate                  8,638,448 (‘‘the ’448 patent’’); U.S.                 ’447 patent; claims 1–4, 14, 15, and 18–
                                                the investigation based on withdrawal                   Patent No. 8,638,447 (‘‘the ’447 patent’’);           20 of the ’175 patent; and claims 1, 3–
                                                of the complaint.                                       U.S. Patent No. 6,845,175 (‘‘the ’175                 7, and 9–13 of the ’853 patent, and
                                                   On November 24, 2017, the ALJ                        patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 6,334,853              whether an industry in the United
                                                issued an ID granting the unopposed                     (‘‘the ’853 patent’’). The amended                    States exists as required by subsection
                                                motion. Order No. 20. The ALJ found                     complaint further alleges that an                     (a)(2) of section 337;
                                                that Complainant complied with                          industry in the United States exists as                  (2) For the purpose of the
                                                                                                        required by the applicable Federal                    investigation so instituted, the following
                                                Commission Rule 210.21. Specifically,
                                                                                                        Statute.                                              are hereby named as parties upon which
                                                the Complainant represented that there
                                                                                                           The complainant requests that the                  this notice of investigation shall be
                                                are no agreements, written or oral,                                                                           served:
                                                                                                        Commission institute an investigation
                                                express or implied concerning the                       and, after the investigation, issue a                    (a) The complainant is: Align
                                                subject matter of the investigation. The                limited exclusion order and cease and                 Technology, Inc., 2820 Orchard
                                                ALJ also found that termination of the                  desist orders.                                        Parkway, San Jose, CA 95134.
                                                investigation is not contrary to the                                                                             (b) The respondents are the following
                                                                                                        ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
                                                public interest and there are no                                                                              entities alleged to be in violation of
                                                                                                        any confidential information contained
                                                extraordinary circumstances that                        therein, is available for inspection                  section 337, and are the parties upon
                                                prevent termination of the investigation.               during official business hours (8:45 a.m.             which the complaint is to be served:
                                                No petitions for review were filed.                     to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the                    3Shape A/S, Holmens Kanal 7, 1060
                                                   The Commission has determined not                    Secretary, U.S. International Trade                      Copenhagen K, Denmark.
                                                to review the subject ID.                               Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room                     3Shape, Inc., 10 Independence
                                                                                                        112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone                     Boulevard, Suite 150, Warren, NJ
                                                   The authority for the Commission’s                                                                            07059.
                                                determination is contained in section                   (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
                                                337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                       individuals are advised that information                 (3) For the investigation so instituted,
                                                amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part                   on this matter can be obtained by                     the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
                                                                                                        contacting the Commission’s TDD                       U.S. International Trade Commission,
                                                210 of the Commission’s Rules of
                                                                                                        terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons                   shall designate the presiding
                                                Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
                                                                                                        with mobility impairments who will                    Administrative Law Judge.
                                                210).                                                   need special assistance in gaining access                The Office of Unfair Import
                                                  By order of the Commission.                           to the Commission should contact the                  Investigations will not participate as a
                                                                                                        Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                  Issued: December 14, 2017.                                                                                  party in this investigation.
                                                Lisa R. Barton,                                         2000. General information concerning                     The Chief Administrative Law Judge
                                                                                                        the Commission may also be obtained                   is authorized to consolidate Inv. No.
                                                Secretary to the Commission.
                                                                                                        by accessing its internet server at                   337–TA–1090 with Inv. No. 337–TA–
                                                [FR Doc. 2017–27262 Filed 12–18–17; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                        https://www.usitc.gov. The public                     1091 if he deems appropriate.
                                                BILLING CODE 7020–02–P                                  record for this investigation may be                     Responses to the complaint and the
                                                                                                        viewed on the Commission’s electronic                 notice of investigation must be
                                                                                                        docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.              submitted by the named respondents in


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:47 Dec 18, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00043   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM   19DEN1



Document Created: 2017-12-19 01:31:05
Document Modified: 2017-12-19 01:31:05
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
ContactAmanda Fisherow, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2737. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
FR Citation82 FR 60214 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR