82_FR_61111 82 FR 60865 - Medical Devices; Anesthesiology Devices; Classification of the External Negative Pressure Airway Aid

82 FR 60865 - Medical Devices; Anesthesiology Devices; Classification of the External Negative Pressure Airway Aid

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 246 (December 26, 2017)

Page Range60865-60867
FR Document2017-27784

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is classifying the external negative pressure airway aid into class II (special controls). The special controls that apply to the device type are identified in this order and will be part of the codified language for the external negative pressure airway aid's classification. We are taking this action because we have determined that classifying the device into class II (special controls) will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device. We believe this action will also enhance patients' access to beneficial innovative devices, in part by reducing regulatory burdens.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 246 (Tuesday, December 26, 2017)
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 26, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60865-60867]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27784]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 868

[Docket No. FDA-2017-N-6568]


Medical Devices; Anesthesiology Devices; Classification of the 
External Negative Pressure Airway Aid

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is classifying 
the external negative pressure airway aid into class II (special 
controls). The special controls that apply to the device type are 
identified in this order and will be part of the codified language for 
the external negative pressure airway aid's classification. We are 
taking this action because we have determined that classifying the 
device into class II (special controls) will provide a reasonable 
assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device. We believe this 
action will also enhance patients' access to beneficial innovative 
devices, in part by reducing regulatory burdens.

DATES: This order is effective December 26, 2017. The classification 
was applicable on December 23, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Courtney, Center for Devices and 
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire 
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 2530, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-6371, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    Upon request, FDA has classified the external negative pressure 
airway aid as class II (special controls), which we have determined 
will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. In 
addition, we believe this action will enhance patients' access to 
beneficial innovation, in part by reducing regulatory burdens by 
placing the device into a lower device class than the automatic class 
III assignment.
    The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law 
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by 
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution 
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains 
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA 
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device

[[Page 60866]]

(see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as 
``postamendments devices'' because they were not in commercial 
distribution prior to the date of enactment of the Medical Device 
Amendments of 1976, which amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act (FD&C Act).
    FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to 
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an 
order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section 
513(i) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that 
does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new device 
is substantially equivalent to a predicate by means of the procedures 
for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act and 
part 807 (21 U.S.C. 360(k) and 21 CFR part 807, respectively).
    FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification, 
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the 
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization 
Act of 1997 established the first procedure for De Novo classification 
(Pub. L. 105-115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration 
Safety and Innovation Act modified the De Novo application process by 
adding a second procedure (Pub. L. 112-144). A device sponsor may 
utilize either procedure for De Novo classification.
    Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device 
that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from 
FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of 
the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section 
513(f)(2).
    Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k) 
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that 
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination 
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under 
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
    Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA shall 
classify the device by written order within 120 days. The 
classification will be according to the criteria under section 
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically placed 
within class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the 
initial classification of the device.
    We believe this De Novo classification will enhance patients' 
access to beneficial innovation, in part by reducing regulatory 
burdens. When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De 
Novo process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of 
that type, including for 510(k)s (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a 
result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a De Novo request 
or premarket approval application in order to market a substantially 
equivalent device (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i), defining ``substantial 
equivalence''). Instead, sponsors can use the less-burdensome 510(k) 
process, when necessary, to market their device.

II. De Novo Classification

    On August 18, 2014, Sommetrics submitted a request for De Novo 
classification of the cNEP Airway Management System. FDA reviewed the 
request in order to classify the device under the criteria for 
classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
    We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves 
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and 
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special 
controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide 
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for 
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the 
information submitted in the request, we determined that the device can 
be classified into class II with the establishment of special controls. 
FDA has determined that these special controls, in addition to the 
general controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and 
effectiveness of the device.
    Therefore, on December 23, 2015, FDA issued an order to the 
requester classifying the device into class II. FDA is codifying the 
classification of the device by adding 21 CFR 868.5105. We have named 
the generic type of device external negative pressure airway aid, and 
it is identified as a prescription device that applies negative 
pressure to a patient's neck to aid in providing a patent airway during 
procedures requiring anesthesia.
    FDA has identified the following risks to health associated 
specifically with this type of device and the measures required to 
mitigate these risks in table 1.

   Table 1--External Negative Pressure Airway Aid Risks and Mitigation
                                Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Identified risks                   Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impaired blood flow........................  Clinical performance
                                              testing.
Failure of device or negative pressure       Non-clinical performance
 mechanism.                                   testing.
Adverse tissue reaction....................  Biocompatibility.
Dislodging of plaque, leading to possible    Labeling.
 stroke.
Inadequate collar fit......................  Labeling.
Use error..................................  Labeling.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the 
general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable 
assurance of safety and effectiveness. For a device to fall within this 
classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III, 
it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final 
order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified 
by this order. This device is subject to premarket notification 
requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
    At the time of classification, external negative pressure airway 
aids are for prescription use only. Prescription devices are exempt 
from the requirement for adequate directions for use for the layperson 
under section 502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)) and 21 
CFR 801.5, as long as the conditions of 21 CFR 801.109 are met.

III. Analysis of Environmental Impact

    The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is 
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental 
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

[[Page 60867]]

IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This final order establishes special controls that refer to 
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA 
regulations. These collections of information are subject to review by 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections of information in 
the guidance document ``De Novo Classification Process (Evaluation of 
Automatic Class III Designation)'' have been approved under OMB control 
number 0910-0844; the collections of information in part 814, subparts 
A through E, regarding premarket approval, have been approved under OMB 
control number 0910-0231; the collections of information in part 807, 
subpart E, regarding premarket notification submissions, have been 
approved under OMB control number 0910-0120; and the collections of 
information in 21 CFR part 801, regarding labeling, have been approved 
under OMB control number 0910-0485.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 868

    Medical devices.

    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 
868 is amended as follows:

PART 868--ANESTHESIOLOGY DEVICES

0
1. The authority citation for part 868 is revised to read as follows:

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.


0
2. Add Sec.  868.5105 to subpart F to read as follows:


Sec.  868.5105   External negative pressure airway aid.

    (a) Identification. An external negative pressure airway aid is a 
prescription device that applies negative pressure to a patient's neck 
to aid in providing a patent airway during procedures requiring 
anesthesia.
    (b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special 
controls for this device are:
    (1) Clinical performance testing must document any adverse events 
observed during clinical use, including impaired blood flow, and 
demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated 
conditions.
    (2) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the 
device performs as intended under anticipated patient positions, does 
not fail during use, and does not lose negative pressure capability. 
The following testing should be performed:
    (i) Ability of the device to maintain a seal during various patient 
positions;
    (ii) Device leakage testing to demonstrate the device maintains 
vacuum;
    (iii) Drop testing to ensure the device does not incur functional 
damage after dropping the device; and
    (iv) Functional testing after high and low storage temperature.
    (3) All patient contacting components must be demonstrated to be 
biocompatible.
    (4) Labeling must include:
    (i) A summary of clinical testing results, including any adverse 
events and evidence that effectiveness has been achieved.
    (ii) Technical specifications of the device, including collar 
sizes, maximum duration of use, operating temperature, and storage 
temperature range.
    (iii) Technical specifications of the vacuum source, including 
maximum vacuum level and operational vacuum level.
    (iv) Instructions for use that includes how to place the device, 
determination of size, verification of suction, reference to training 
materials, and information on troubleshooting the device if it does not 
attach properly.
    (v) A warning to screen patients for carotid artery disease due to 
the probable risk of the device to dislodge arterial plaques in the 
carotid artery.
    (vi) A warning to exclude patients with anatomical abnormalities.
    (vii) A warning not to use the device during medical procedures 
involving medications that contain propofol.

    Dated: December 20, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-27784 Filed 12-22-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P



                                                              Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2017 / Rules and Regulations                                        60865

                                             rules can be found at 82 FR 44982                       ■ 2. In § 201.32, remove paragraphs (a)               DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
                                             (September 27, 2017).                                   and (b); redesignate paragraph (c) as                 HUMAN SERVICES
                                             Regulatory Analysis of Amendments to                    paragraph (a); revise the first sentence of
                                                                                                     newly redesignated paragraph (a); and                 Food and Drug Administration
                                             the Commission’s Rules
                                                                                                     add paragraph (b) to read as follows:
                                                The Commission certifies that these                                                                        21 CFR Part 868
                                             amendments to the Commission’s rules                    § 201.32    Specific exemptions.
                                                                                                                                                           [Docket No. FDA–2017–N–6568]
                                             will not have a significant economic                       (a) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1), (5)
                                             impact on a substantial number of small                                                                       Medical Devices; Anesthesiology
                                                                                                     and (6), records contained in the system
                                             entities under the Regulatory Flexibility                                                                     Devices; Classification of the External
                                                                                                     entitled ‘‘Personnel Security
                                             Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) because it does                                                                    Negative Pressure Airway Aid
                                                                                                     Investigative Files’’ have been exempted
                                             not create an economic impact and does
                                             not affect small entities. The                          from subsections (c)(3), (d), (e)(1),                 AGENCY:    Food and Drug Administration,
                                             amendments are concerned only with                      (e)(4)(G) through (I) and (f) of the                  HHS.
                                             the administration of Privacy Act                       Privacy Act. * * *                                    ACTION:   Final order.
                                             systems of records within the                              (b) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1) and
                                             Commission.                                             (k)(2), records contained in the system               SUMMARY:    The Food and Drug
                                                The amendments to the Commission’s                   entitled ‘‘Freedom of Information Act                 Administration (FDA or we) is
                                             rules do not contain any information                    and Privacy Act Records’’ have been                   classifying the external negative
                                             collection requirements subject to the                  exempted from subsections (c)(3), (d),                pressure airway aid into class II (special
                                             provisions of the Paperwork Reduction                   (e)(1), (e)(4)(G) through (I) and (f) of the          controls). The special controls that
                                             Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).                                                                                 apply to the device type are identified
                                                                                                     Privacy Act. Pursuant to section
                                                No actions are necessary under title II                                                                    in this order and will be part of the
                                                                                                     552a(k)(1) of the Privacy Act, the
                                             of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act                                                                           codified language for the external
                                                                                                     Commission exempts records that
                                             of 1995, Public Law 104–4 (2 U.S.C.                                                                           negative pressure airway aid’s
                                                                                                     contain properly classified information               classification. We are taking this action
                                             1531–1538) because the amendments to                    pertaining to national defense or foreign
                                             the Commission’s rules will not result                                                                        because we have determined that
                                                                                                     policy. Application of exemption (k)(1)               classifying the device into class II
                                             in the expenditure by State, local, and                 may be necessary to preclude
                                             tribal governments, in the aggregate, or                                                                      (special controls) will provide a
                                                                                                     individuals’ access to or amendment of                reasonable assurance of safety and
                                             by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or
                                                                                                     such classified information under the                 effectiveness of the device. We believe
                                             more in any one year (adjusted annually
                                                                                                     Privacy Act. Pursuant to section                      this action will also enhance patients’
                                             for inflation), and will not significantly
                                                                                                     552a(k)(2) of the Privacy Act, and in                 access to beneficial innovative devices,
                                             or uniquely affect small governments.
                                                The Commission has determined that                   order to protect the effectiveness of                 in part by reducing regulatory burdens.
                                             these rules do not meet the criteria                    Inspector General investigations by                   DATES: This order is effective December
                                             described in section 3(f) of Executive                  preventing individuals who may be the                 26, 2017. The classification was
                                             Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4,                    subject of an investigation from                      applicable on December 23, 2015.
                                             1993) and thus do not constitute a                      obtaining access to the records and thus              FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                             ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ for                   obtaining the opportunity to conceal or               Todd Courtney, Center for Devices and
                                             purposes of the Executive Order.                        destroy evidence or to intimidate                     Radiological Health, Food and Drug
                                                The amendments to the Commission’s                   witnesses, the Commission exempts                     Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
                                             rules do not have Federalism                            records insofar as they include                       Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 2530, Silver Spring,
                                             implications warranting the preparation                 investigatory material compiled for law               MD 20993–0002, 301–796–6371,
                                             of a federalism summary impact                          enforcement purposes. However, if any                 Todd.Courtney@fda.hhs.gov.
                                             statement under Executive Order 13132                   individual is denied any right, privilege,            SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                             (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).                         or benefit to which he is otherwise
                                                The amendments to the Commission’s                   entitled under Federal law due to the                 I. Background
                                             rules are not ‘‘major rules’’ as defined by             maintenance of this material, such                       Upon request, FDA has classified the
                                             section 251 of the Small Business                       material shall be provided to such                    external negative pressure airway aid as
                                             Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of                  individual except to the extent that the              class II (special controls), which we
                                             1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.).                            disclosure of such material would reveal              have determined will provide a
                                             List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 201                     the identity of a source who furnished                reasonable assurance of safety and
                                                                                                     information to the Government under an                effectiveness. In addition, we believe
                                               Administrative practice and                           express promise that the identity of the              this action will enhance patients’ access
                                             procedure.                                              source would be held in confidence.                   to beneficial innovation, in part by
                                               For the reasons stated in the                                                                               reducing regulatory burdens by placing
                                                                                                       By order of the Commission.                         the device into a lower device class than
                                             preamble, under the authority of 19
                                             U.S.C. 1335, the United States                            Issued: December 19, 2017.                          the automatic class III assignment.
                                             International Trade Commission                          Lisa R. Barton,                                          The automatic assignment of class III
                                             amends 19 CFR part 201 as follows:                      Secretary to the Commission.                          occurs by operation of law and without
                                                                                                     [FR Doc. 2017–27671 Filed 12–22–17; 8:45 am]          any action by FDA, regardless of the
                                             PART 201—RULES OF GENERAL                                                                                     level of risk posed by the new device.
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES




                                                                                                     BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
                                             APPLICATION                                                                                                   Any device that was not in commercial
                                                                                                                                                           distribution before May 28, 1976, is
                                             ■ 1. The authority citation for part 201                                                                      automatically classified as, and remains
                                             continues to read as follows:                                                                                 within, class III and requires premarket
                                               Authority: 19 U.S.C. 1335; 19 U.S.C. 2482,                                                                  approval unless and until FDA takes an
                                             unless otherwise noted.                                                                                       action to classify or reclassify the device


                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:22 Dec 22, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00021   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\26DER1.SGM   26DER1


                                             60866                 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

                                             (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to                                     513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person                                       classification of the cNEP Airway
                                             these devices as ‘‘postamendments                                           then requests a classification under                                        Management System. FDA reviewed the
                                             devices’’ because they were not in                                          section 513(f)(2).                                                          request in order to classify the device
                                             commercial distribution prior to the                                           Under the second procedure, rather                                       under the criteria for classification set
                                             date of enactment of the Medical Device                                     than first submitting a 510(k) and then                                     forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C
                                             Amendments of 1976, which amended                                           a request for classification, if the person                                 Act.
                                             the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic                                        determines that there is no legally                                            We classify devices into class II if
                                             Act (FD&C Act).                                                             marketed device upon which to base a                                        general controls by themselves are
                                               FDA may take a variety of actions in                                      determination of substantial                                                insufficient to provide reasonable
                                             appropriate circumstances to classify or                                    equivalence, that person requests a                                         assurance of safety and effectiveness,
                                             reclassify a device into class I or II. We                                  classification under section 513(f)(2) of                                   but there is sufficient information to
                                             may issue an order finding a new device                                     the FD&C Act.                                                               establish special controls that, in
                                             to be substantially equivalent under                                           Under either procedure for De Novo                                       combination with the general controls,
                                             section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (21                                          classification, FDA shall classify the                                      provide reasonable assurance of the
                                             U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that                                  device by written order within 120 days.                                    safety and effectiveness of the device for
                                             does not require premarket approval.                                        The classification will be according to                                     its intended use (see 21 U.S.C.
                                             We determine whether a new device is                                        the criteria under section 513(a)(1) of                                     360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
                                             substantially equivalent to a predicate                                     the FD&C Act. Although the device was                                       information submitted in the request,
                                             by means of the procedures for                                              automatically placed within class III,                                      we determined that the device can be
                                             premarket notification under section                                        the De Novo classification is considered                                    classified into class II with the
                                             510(k) of the FD&C Act and part 807 (21                                     to be the initial classification of the                                     establishment of special controls. FDA
                                             U.S.C. 360(k) and 21 CFR part 807,                                          device.                                                                     has determined that these special
                                             respectively).                                                                 We believe this De Novo classification                                   controls, in addition to the general
                                               FDA may also classify a device                                            will enhance patients’ access to                                            controls, will provide reasonable
                                             through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a                                       beneficial innovation, in part by                                           assurance of the safety and effectiveness
                                             common name for the process                                                 reducing regulatory burdens. When FDA                                       of the device.
                                             authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the                                   classifies a device into class I or II via                                     Therefore, on December 23, 2015,
                                             FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and                                       the De Novo process, the device can                                         FDA issued an order to the requester
                                             Drug Administration Modernization Act                                       serve as a predicate for future devices of                                  classifying the device into class II. FDA
                                             of 1997 established the first procedure                                     that type, including for 510(k)s (see 21                                    is codifying the classification of the
                                             for De Novo classification (Pub. L. 105–                                    U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a result, other                                device by adding 21 CFR 868.5105. We
                                             115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug                                      device sponsors do not have to submit                                       have named the generic type of device
                                             Administration Safety and Innovation                                        a De Novo request or premarket                                              external negative pressure airway aid,
                                             Act modified the De Novo application                                        approval application in order to market                                     and it is identified as a prescription
                                             process by adding a second procedure                                        a substantially equivalent device (see 21                                   device that applies negative pressure to
                                             (Pub. L. 112–144). A device sponsor                                         U.S.C. 360c(i), defining ‘‘substantial                                      a patient’s neck to aid in providing a
                                             may utilize either procedure for De                                         equivalence’’). Instead, sponsors can use                                   patent airway during procedures
                                             Novo classification.                                                        the less-burdensome 510(k) process,                                         requiring anesthesia.
                                               Under the first procedure, the person                                     when necessary, to market their device.                                        FDA has identified the following risks
                                             submits a 510(k) for a device that has                                                                                                                  to health associated specifically with
                                             not previously been classified. After                                       II. De Novo Classification                                                  this type of device and the measures
                                             receiving an order from FDA classifying                                       On August 18, 2014, Sommetrics                                            required to mitigate these risks in
                                             the device into class III under section                                     submitted a request for De Novo                                             table 1.

                                                                         TABLE 1—EXTERNAL NEGATIVE PRESSURE AIRWAY AID RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
                                                                                                                Identified risks                                                                                        Mitigation measures

                                             Impaired blood flow ...................................................................................................................................          Clinical performance testing.
                                             Failure of device or negative pressure mechanism ..................................................................................                              Non-clinical performance testing.
                                             Adverse tissue reaction .............................................................................................................................            Biocompatibility.
                                             Dislodging of plaque, leading to possible stroke .......................................................................................                         Labeling.
                                             Inadequate collar fit ...................................................................................................................................        Labeling.
                                             Use error ....................................................................................................................................................   Labeling.



                                               FDA has determined that special                                           premarket notification requirements                                         III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
                                             controls, in combination with the                                           under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
                                             general controls, address these risks to                                                                                                                   The Agency has determined under 21
                                                                                                                           At the time of classification, external                                   CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
                                             health and provide reasonable assurance                                     negative pressure airway aids are for
                                             of safety and effectiveness. For a device                                                                                                               that does not individually or
                                                                                                                         prescription use only. Prescription                                         cumulatively have a significant effect on
                                             to fall within this classification, and                                     devices are exempt from the                                                 the human environment. Therefore,
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES




                                             thus avoid automatic classification in                                      requirement for adequate directions for
                                             class III, it would have to comply with                                                                                                                 neither an environmental assessment
                                                                                                                         use for the layperson under section                                         nor an environmental impact statement
                                             the special controls named in this final                                    502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
                                             order. The necessary special controls                                                                                                                   is required.
                                                                                                                         352(f)(1)) and 21 CFR 801.5, as long as
                                             appear in the regulation codified by this                                   the conditions of 21 CFR 801.109 are
                                             order. This device is subject to                                            met.


                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014         16:22 Dec 22, 2017          Jkt 244001      PO 00000        Frm 00022        Fmt 4700      Sfmt 4700       E:\FR\FM\26DER1.SGM             26DER1


                                                              Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2017 / Rules and Regulations                                       60867

                                             IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995                     capability. The following testing should              General (DAJAG) (Admiralty and
                                               This final order establishes special                  be performed:                                         Maritime Law) has determined that USS
                                             controls that refer to previously                         (i) Ability of the device to maintain a             TULSA (LCS 16) is a vessel of the Navy
                                             approved collections of information                     seal during various patient positions;                which, due to its special construction
                                                                                                       (ii) Device leakage testing to                      and purpose, cannot fully comply with
                                             found in other FDA regulations. These
                                                                                                     demonstrate the device maintains                      certain provisions of the 72 COLREGS
                                             collections of information are subject to
                                                                                                     vacuum;                                               without interfering with its special
                                             review by the Office of Management and
                                                                                                       (iii) Drop testing to ensure the device             function as a naval ship. The intended
                                             Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
                                                                                                     does not incur functional damage after                effect of this rule is to warn mariners in
                                             Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
                                                                                                     dropping the device; and                              waters where 72 COLREGS apply.
                                             3520). The collections of information in                  (iv) Functional testing after high and
                                             the guidance document ‘‘De Novo                                                                               DATES: This rule is effective December
                                                                                                     low storage temperature.                              26, 2017 and is applicable beginning
                                             Classification Process (Evaluation of                     (3) All patient contacting components
                                             Automatic Class III Designation)’’ have                                                                       December 7, 2017.
                                                                                                     must be demonstrated to be
                                             been approved under OMB control                                                                               FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                     biocompatible.
                                             number 0910–0844; the collections of                                                                          Lieutenant Commander Kyle Fralick,
                                                                                                       (4) Labeling must include:
                                             information in part 814, subparts A                       (i) A summary of clinical testing                   JAGC, U.S. Navy, Admiralty Attorney,
                                             through E, regarding premarket                          results, including any adverse events                 (Admiralty and Maritime Law), Office of
                                             approval, have been approved under                      and evidence that effectiveness has been              the Judge Advocate General, Department
                                             OMB control number 0910–0231; the                       achieved.                                             of the Navy, 1322 Patterson Ave. SE,
                                             collections of information in part 807,                   (ii) Technical specifications of the                Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC
                                             subpart E, regarding premarket                          device, including collar sizes, maximum               20374–5066, telephone number: 202–
                                             notification submissions, have been                     duration of use, operating temperature,               685–5040.
                                             approved under OMB control number                       and storage temperature range.                        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
                                             0910–0120; and the collections of                         (iii) Technical specifications of the               to the authority granted in 33 U.S.C.
                                             information in 21 CFR part 801,                         vacuum source, including maximum                      1605, the DoN amends 32 CFR part 706.
                                             regarding labeling, have been approved                  vacuum level and operational vacuum                      This amendment provides notice that
                                             under OMB control number 0910–0485.                     level.                                                the DAJAG (Admiralty and Maritime
                                                                                                       (iv) Instructions for use that includes             Law), under authority delegated by the
                                             List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 868                                                                           Secretary of the Navy, has certified that
                                                                                                     how to place the device, determination
                                               Medical devices.                                      of size, verification of suction, reference           USS TULSA (LCS 16) is a vessel of the
                                               Therefore, under the Federal Food,                    to training materials, and information                Navy which, due to its special
                                             Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under                        on troubleshooting the device if it does              construction and purpose, cannot fully
                                             authority delegated to the Commissioner                 not attach properly.                                  comply with the following specific
                                             of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 868 is                     (v) A warning to screen patients for                provisions of 72 COLREGS without
                                             amended as follows:                                     carotid artery disease due to the                     interfering with its special function as a
                                                                                                     probable risk of the device to dislodge               naval ship: Annex I paragraph 2 (a)(i),
                                             PART 868—ANESTHESIOLOGY                                 arterial plaques in the carotid artery.               pertaining to the height of the forward
                                             DEVICES                                                   (vi) A warning to exclude patients                  masthead light above the hull; Annex I,
                                                                                                     with anatomical abnormalities.                        paragraph 2(f)(i), pertaining to the
                                             ■  1. The authority citation for part 868                 (vii) A warning not to use the device               placement of the masthead light or
                                             is revised to read as follows:                          during medical procedures involving                   lights above and clear of all other lights
                                               Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,            medications that contain propofol.                    and obstructions; Annex I, paragraph
                                             360j, 360l, 371.                                                                                              2(f)(ii), pertaining to the vertical
                                                                                                       Dated: December 20, 2017.
                                             ■ 2. Add § 868.5105 to subpart F to read                                                                      placement of task lights; Annex I,
                                                                                                     Leslie Kux,
                                             as follows:                                                                                                   paragraph 3(a), pertaining to the
                                                                                                     Associate Commissioner for Policy.                    location of the forward masthead light
                                             § 868.5105 External negative pressure                   [FR Doc. 2017–27784 Filed 12–22–17; 8:45 am]          in the forward quarter of the ship, and
                                             airway aid.                                             BILLING CODE 4164–01–P                                the horizontal distance between the
                                               (a) Identification. An external                                                                             forward and after masthead light; Rule
                                             negative pressure airway aid is a                                                                             27(b)(i) and Annex I, paragraph 9(b)(i),
                                             prescription device that applies negative               DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE                                 pertaining to the arc of visibility of
                                             pressure to a patient’s neck to aid in                                                                        middle tasks lights. The DAJAG
                                             providing a patent airway during                        Department of the Navy                                (Admiralty and Maritime Law) has also
                                             procedures requiring anesthesia.                                                                              certified that the lights involved are
                                               (b) Classification. Class II (special                 32 CFR Part 706                                       located in closest possible compliance
                                             controls). The special controls for this                                                                      with the applicable 72 COLREGS
                                             device are:                                             Certifications and Exemptions Under
                                                                                                                                                           requirements.
                                               (1) Clinical performance testing must                 the International Regulations for                        Moreover, it has been determined, in
                                             document any adverse events observed                    Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972                    accordance with 32 CFR parts 296 and
                                             during clinical use, including impaired                 AGENCY:    Department of the Navy, DoD.               701, that publication of this amendment
                                             blood flow, and demonstrate that the                    ACTION:   Final rule.                                 for public comment prior to adoption is
                                                                                                                                                           impracticable, unnecessary, and
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES




                                             device performs as intended under
                                             anticipated conditions.                                 SUMMARY:  The Department of the Navy                  contrary to public interest since it is
                                               (2) Non-clinical performance testing                  (DoN) is amending its certifications and              based on technical findings that the
                                             must demonstrate that the device                        exemptions under the International                    placement of lights on this vessel in a
                                             performs as intended under anticipated                  Regulations for Preventing Collisions at              manner differently from that prescribed
                                             patient positions, does not fail during                 Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), to reflect that               herein will adversely affect the vessel’s
                                             use, and does not lose negative pressure                the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate                   ability to perform its military functions.


                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:22 Dec 22, 2017   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00023   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\26DER1.SGM   26DER1



Document Created: 2017-12-23 03:08:17
Document Modified: 2017-12-23 03:08:17
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal order.
DatesThis order is effective December 26, 2017. The classification was applicable on December 23, 2015.
ContactTodd Courtney, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 2530, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-6371, [email protected]
FR Citation82 FR 60865 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR