82 FR 60870 - Finding of Failure To Submit a Section 110 State Implementation Plan for Interstate Transport for the 2012 Annual National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Fine Particles; Massachusetts
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 246 (December 26, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 246 (December 26, 2017)
| Page Range | 60870-60872 | |
| FR Document | 2017-27625 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 26, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 60870-60872] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-27625] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R01-OAR-2017-0695, FRL-9972-39-Region 1] Finding of Failure To Submit a Section 110 State Implementation Plan for Interstate Transport for the 2012 Annual National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Fine Particles; Massachusetts AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action finding that Massachusetts failed to submit an infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) to satisfy certain interstate transport requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) with respect to the 2012 annual fine particles (PM2.5 ) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). Specifically, these requirements pertain to significant contribution to nonattainment, or interference with maintenance, of the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS in other states. This finding of failure to submit establishes a 2-year deadline for the EPA to promulgate a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to address the interstate transport SIP requirements pertaining to significant contribution to nonattainment, interference with maintenance, interference with Prevention of Significant Deterioration, and interference with visibility protection, unless, prior to the EPA promulgating a FIP, the state submits, and the EPA approves, a SIP that meets these requirements. DATES: This final rule is effective on January 25, 2018. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA-R01-OAR-2017-0695. All documents in the dockets are listed on http://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, Office of Ecosystem Protection, Air Quality Planning Unit, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, Boston, MA. The EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the hard copy of the docket. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alison C. Simcox, Environmental Scientist, Air Quality Planning Unit, Air Programs Branch (Mail Code OEP05-02), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100, Boston, Massachusetts 02109-3912; (617) 918- 1684; [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Notice and Comment Under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) Section 553 of the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing notice and an opportunity for public comment. The EPA has determined that there is good cause for making this rule final without prior proposal and opportunity for comment because no significant EPA judgment is involved in making a finding of failure to submit SIPs, or elements of SIPs, required by the CAA, where states have made no submissions or incomplete submissions, to meet the requirement. Thus, notice and public procedure are unnecessary. The EPA finds that this constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). B. How is the Preamble Organized? Table of Contents I. General Information II. Background and Overview A. Interstate Transport SIPs B. Background on the 2012 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS III. Finding of Failure To Submit for Massachusetts IV. Environmental Justice Considerations V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews II. Background and Overview A. Interstate Transport SIPs CAA section 110(a) imposes an obligation upon states to submit SIPs that provide for the implementation, maintenance and enforcement of a new or revised NAAQS within three years following the promulgation of that NAAQS. Section 110(a)(2) lists specific requirements that states must meet in these SIP submissions, as applicable. The EPA refers to this type of SIP submission as the ``infrastructure'' SIP because it ensures that states can implement, maintain and enforce the air standards. Within these requirements, section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) contains requirements to address interstate transport of NAAQS pollutants. A SIP revision submitted for this sub-section is referred to as an ``interstate transport SIP.'' In turn, section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) requires that such a plan contain adequate provisions to prohibit emissions from the state that will contribute significantly to nonattainment of the NAAQS in any other state (``prong 1'') or interfere with maintenance of the NAAQS in any other state (``prong 2''). Section [[Page 60871]] 110(a)(2)(D(i)(II) requires that such a plan contain adequate provisions to prohibit emissions from the state that will interfere with measures required of any other state to prevent significant deterioration of air quality (``prong 3'') or that will interfere with measures required of any other state to protect visibility (``prong 4''). These are the requirements relevant to this finding. Pursuant to CAA section 110(k)(1)(B), the EPA must determine no later than six months after the date by which a state is required to submit a SIP whether a state has made a submission that meets the minimum completeness criteria established per section 110(k)(1)(A). The EPA refers to the determination that a state has not submitted a SIP submission that meets the minimum completeness criteria as a ``finding of failure to submit.'' If the EPA finds a state has failed to submit a SIP to meet its statutory obligation to address section 110(a)(2)(D)(i), pursuant to section 110(c)(1) the EPA has not only the authority, but the obligation, to promulgate a FIP within two years to address the CAA requirement. This finding therefore starts a two-year clock for promulgation by the EPA of a FIP, in accordance with section 110(c)(1), unless prior to such promulgation the state submits, and the EPA approves, a submittal to meet the requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. The EPA will work with the state subject to this finding of failure to submit and provide assistance as necessary to help the state develop an approvable submittal in a timely manner. The EPA notes this action does not start a mandatory sanctions clock pursuant to CAA section 179 because this finding of failure to submit does not pertain to a part D plan for nonattainment areas required under section 110(a)(2)(I) or a SIP call pursuant to section 110(k)(5). B. Background on the 2012 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS On December 14, 2012, the EPA promulgated a revised primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS to provide increased protection of public health and welfare from fine particle pollution.\1\ In that action, the EPA revised the primary annual PM2.5 standard, strengthening it from 15.0 micrograms per cubic meter ([mu]g/m\3\) to 12.0 [mu]g/m\3\, which is attained when the three-year average of the annual arithmetic means does not exceed 12.0 [mu]g/m\3\. Infrastructure SIPs addressing the revised standard were due on December 14, 2015. CAA Sec. 110(a)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 78 FR 3086; January 15, 2013. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Finding of Failure To Submit for Massachusetts To date, Massachusetts has not submitted a good neighbor SIP for the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Accordingly, the EPA is issuing a finding that Massachusetts has failed to submit a SIP addressing the requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(D)(i) (prongs 1-4), for the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. IV. Environmental Justice Considerations This notice is making a procedural finding that Massachusetts has failed to submit a SIP to address CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. The EPA did not conduct an environmental analysis for this rule, because this rule would not directly affect the air emissions from particular sources. Because this rule will not directly affect the air emissions from particular sources, it does not affect the level of protection provided to human health or the environment. Therefore, this action will not have potential disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority, low-income or indigenous populations. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review This action is not a significant regulatory action and was therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs This action is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action, because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) This action does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. This final rule does not establish any new information collection requirement apart from what is already required by law. D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) This action is not subject to the RFA. The RFA applies only to rules subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other statute. This rule is not subject to notice and comment requirements, because the agency has invoked the APA ``good cause'' exemption under 5 U.S.C. 553(b). E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The action implements mandates specifically and explicitly set forth in the CAA under section 110(a) without the exercise of any policy discretion by the EPA. F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments This action does not have tribal implications as specified in Executive Order 13175. This rule responds to the requirement in the CAA for states to submit SIPs under section 110(a) to address CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. No tribe is subject to the requirement to submit an implementation plan under section 110(a) within 3 years of promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action. H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health and Safety Risks The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045, because it does not concern an environmental health risk or safety risk. I. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. [[Page 60872]] J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act This rulemaking does not involve technical standards. K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations The EPA believes the human health or environmental risk addressed by this action will not have potential disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority, low-income or indigenous populations, because it does not affect the level of protection provided to human health or the environment. The EPA's evaluation of environmental justice considerations is contained in section IV of this notice. L. Congressional Review Act (CRA) This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). M. Petitions for Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 26, 2018. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Interstate transport, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: December 11, 2017. Deborah A. Szaro, Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New England. [FR Doc. 2017-27625 Filed 12-22-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![60870 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
will be used. The bridge has a vertical SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection I. General Information
clearance of 14 feet above mean high Agency (EPA) is taking final action
A. Notice and Comment Under the
water in the closed position and finding that Massachusetts failed to
Administrative Procedures Act (APA)
unlimited feet above mean high water in submit an infrastructure State
the open position. The bridge will open Implementation Plan (SIP) to satisfy Section 553 of the APA, 5 U.S.C.
on signal at all other times. The current certain interstate transport requirements 553(b)(3)(B), provides that, when an
operating schedule is set out in 33 CFR of the Clean Air Act (CAA) with respect agency for good cause finds that notice
117.5. to the 2012 annual fine particles (PM2.5) and public procedure are impracticable,
The AICW, Alligator River is used by national ambient air quality standard unnecessary or contrary to the public
a variety of vessels including, small (NAAQS). Specifically, these interest, the agency may issue a rule
commercial vessels, tug and barge requirements pertain to significant without providing notice and an
traffic, and recreational vessels. The contribution to nonattainment, or opportunity for public comment. The
Coast Guard has carefully coordinated interference with maintenance, of the EPA has determined that there is good
the restrictions with waterway users in 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS in other cause for making this rule final without
publishing this temporary deviation. states. This finding of failure to submit prior proposal and opportunity for
Vessels able to pass through the establishes a 2-year deadline for the comment because no significant EPA
bridge in the closed-to-navigation EPA to promulgate a Federal judgment is involved in making a
position may do so at any time. During Implementation Plan (FIP) to address finding of failure to submit SIPs, or
the closure periods, the bridge will not the interstate transport SIP requirements elements of SIPs, required by the CAA,
be able to open for emergencies and the pertaining to significant contribution to where states have made no submissions
Croatan Sound to the Pamlico Sound nonattainment, interference with or incomplete submissions, to meet the
can be used as an alternative route for maintenance, interference with requirement. Thus, notice and public
vessels unable to pass through the Prevention of Significant Deterioration, procedure are unnecessary. The EPA
bridge in the closed position. During the and interference with visibility finds that this constitutes good cause
closure periods with scheduled protection, unless, prior to the EPA under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
openings at noon, the bridge will be able promulgating a FIP, the state submits,
and the EPA approves, a SIP that meets B. How is the Preamble Organized?
to open up for emergencies, if at least
one hour notice is given. The Coast these requirements. Table of Contents
Guard will also inform the users of the DATES: This final rule is effective on
waterway through our Local Notice and January 25, 2018. I. General Information
II. Background and Overview
Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
A. Interstate Transport SIPs
change in operating schedule for the docket for this action under Docket ID B. Background on the 2012 Annual PM2.5
bridge so vessel operators can arrange No. EPA–R01–OAR–2017–0695. All NAAQS
their transits to minimize any impact documents in the dockets are listed on III. Finding of Failure To Submit for
caused by the temporary deviation. http://www.regulations.gov. Although Massachusetts
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), listed in the index, some information is IV. Environmental Justice Considerations
the drawbridge must return to its regular not publicly available, e.g., Confidential V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
operating schedule immediately at the Business Information (CBI) or other II. Background and Overview
end of the effective period of this information whose disclosure is
temporary deviation. This deviation restricted by statute. Certain other A. Interstate Transport SIPs
from the operating regulations is material, such as copyrighted material, CAA section 110(a) imposes an
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35. will be publicly available only in hard obligation upon states to submit SIPs
Dated: December 18, 2017. copy. Publicly available docket that provide for the implementation,
Hal R. Pitts,
materials are available at http:// maintenance and enforcement of a new
www.regulations.gov or at the U.S. or revised NAAQS within three years
Bridge Program Manager, Fifth Coast Guard
District.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA following the promulgation of that
New England Regional Office, Office of NAAQS. Section 110(a)(2) lists specific
[FR Doc. 2017–27718 Filed 12–22–17; 8:45 am]
Ecosystem Protection, Air Quality requirements that states must meet in
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Planning Unit, 5 Post Office Square— these SIP submissions, as applicable.
Suite 100, Boston, MA. The EPA The EPA refers to this type of SIP
requests that if at all possible, you submission as the ‘‘infrastructure’’ SIP
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION contact the individuals listed in the FOR because it ensures that states can
AGENCY FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to implement, maintain and enforce the air
view the hard copy of the docket. The standards. Within these requirements,
40 CFR Part 52 Regional Office’s official hours of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) contains
[EPA–R01–OAR–2017–0695, FRL–9972–39– business are Monday through Friday, requirements to address interstate
Region 1] 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding federal transport of NAAQS pollutants. A SIP
holidays. revision submitted for this sub-section
Finding of Failure To Submit a Section FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: is referred to as an ‘‘interstate transport
110 State Implementation Plan for Alison C. Simcox, Environmental SIP.’’ In turn, section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)
Interstate Transport for the 2012 Scientist, Air Quality Planning Unit, Air requires that such a plan contain
Annual National Ambient Air Quality Programs Branch (Mail Code OEP05– adequate provisions to prohibit
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Standards for Fine Particles; 02), U.S. Environmental Protection emissions from the state that will
Massachusetts Agency, Region 1, 5 Post Office Square, contribute significantly to
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Suite 100, Boston, Massachusetts nonattainment of the NAAQS in any
Agency (EPA). 02109–3912; (617) 918–1684; other state (‘‘prong 1’’) or interfere with
simcox.alison@epa.gov. maintenance of the NAAQS in any other
ACTION: Final rule.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: state (‘‘prong 2’’). Section
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:22 Dec 22, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\26DER1.SGM 26DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_61116/page/1.svg)
![60872 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
J. National Technology Transfer and ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION the companion proposed rule which
Advancement Act AGENCY was also published on October 26, 2017
(82 FR 49563). In the DFR, we stated
This rulemaking does not involve 40 CFR Part 62 that if we received adverse comment by
technical standards. November 27, 2017, the rule would be
[EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0509; FRL–9972–52–
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Region 3] withdrawn and not take effect. EPA
Actions To Address Environmental subsequently received an adverse
Full Withdrawal of Approval and comment. EPA will address the
Justice in Minority Populations and
Promulgation of State Air Quality Plans comment received in a subsequent final
Low-Income Populations
for Designated Facilities and action based upon the proposed action
The EPA believes the human health or Pollutants; City of Philadelphia; also published on October 26, 2017.
environmental risk addressed by this Control of Emissions From Existing EPA will not institute a second
action will not have potential Sewage Sludge Incineration Units comment period on this action. As a
disproportionately high and adverse result of the comment received, EPA is
AGENCY: Environmental Protection withdrawing the direct final rule
human health or environmental effects Agency (EPA).
on minority, low-income or indigenous approving the negative declaration
ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule. submitted by the City of Philadelphia
populations, because it does not affect
for existing SSI units.
the level of protection provided to SUMMARY: Due to the receipt of an
human health or the environment. The adverse comment, the Environmental List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
EPA’s evaluation of environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is withdrawing Environmental protection,
justice considerations is contained in the October 26, 2017 direct final rule Administrative practice and procedure,
section IV of this notice. (DFR) that approved a negative Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
declaration submitted by the City of relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
L. Congressional Review Act (CRA) Philadelphia. The negative declaration requirements, Waste treatment and
certified that no existing sewage sludge disposal.
This action is subject to the CRA, and
incineration (SSI) units exist within the
the EPA will submit a rule report to Dated: December 15, 2017.
City of Philadelphia. EPA stated in the
each House of the Congress and to the Cosmo Servidio
direct final rule that if EPA received
Comptroller General of the United adverse comments by November 27, Regional Administrator, Region III.
States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ 2017, the rule would be withdrawn and
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). ■ Accordingly, the amendments to 40
not take effect. EPA subsequently CFR 62.9665, published on October 26,
M. Petitions for Judicial Review received an adverse comment. This 2017 (82 FR 49511), are withdrawn
withdrawal action is being taken under effective December 26, 2017.
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, sections 129 and 111(d) of the Clean Air [FR Doc. 2017–27795 Filed 12–22–17; 8:45 am]
petitions for judicial review of this Act.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
action must be filed in the United States DATES: The direct final rule published at
Court of Appeals for the appropriate 82 FR 49511 on October 26, 2017, is
circuit by February 26, 2018. Filing a withdrawn effective December 26, 2017. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
petition for reconsideration by the ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket AGENCY
Administrator of this final rule does not number EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0509 for
affect the finality of this rule for the this action. The index to the docket is 40 CFR Part 62
purposes of judicial review nor does it available electronically at http://
extend the time within which a petition www.regulations.gov and in hard copy [EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0484; FRL–9972–55-
for judicial review may be filed, and at Air Protection Division, U.S. Region 3]
shall not postpone the effectiveness of Environmental Protection Agency,
such rule or action. This action may not Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Approval and Promulgation of Air
be challenged later in proceedings to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Quality Implementation Plans;
enforce its requirements (see section FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Maryland; Continuous Opacity
Mike Gordon, (215) 814–2039, or by Monitoring Requirements for Municipal
307(b)(2)).
email at gordon.mike@epa.gov. Waste Combustors; Withdrawal of
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Direct Final Rule
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Environmental protection, Air Philadelphia Air Management Services AGENCY: Environmental Protection
pollution control, Incorporation by submitted a negative declaration letter Agency (EPA).
reference, Intergovernmental relations, to EPA certifying on March 28, 2012 ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.
Interstate transport, Particulate matter, that there are no SSI units subject to the
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements of sections 111(d) and 129 SUMMARY: Due to the receipt of an
requirements. of the CAA in its respective air adverse comment, the Environmental
pollution control jurisdiction. The Protection Agency (EPA) is withdrawing
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. negative declaration letter and EPA’s the November 6, 2017 direct final rule
Dated: December 11, 2017. technical support document for this (DFR) that approved revisions to the
State of Maryland’s Clean Air Act (CAA)
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Deborah A. Szaro, action are available in the docket for
this rulemaking and available online at section 111(d)/129 State Plan for
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New
England.
www.regulations.gov. municipal waste combustors (MWCs).
Please see additional information The revisions contain Maryland’s
[FR Doc. 2017–27625 Filed 12–22–17; 8:45 am]
provided in the direct final action amendments to Regulations .07 and .08
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P published in the Federal Register on under the Code of Maryland Regulations
October 26, 2017 (82 FR 49511) and in (COMAR) 26.11.08. This withdrawal
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:22 Dec 22, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\26DER1.SGM 26DER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_61116/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2017-12-23 03:08:10
Document Modified: 2017-12-23 03:08:10
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This final rule is effective on January 25, 2018. | |
| Contact | Alison C. Simcox, Environmental Scientist, Air Quality Planning Unit, Air Programs Branch (Mail Code OEP05-02), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100, Boston, Massachusetts 02109-3912; (617) 918- 1684; [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 60870 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Interstate Transport; Particulate Matter and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR