82 FR 6250 - Safety Zone; Pleasure Beach Bridge, Bridgeport, CT

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 12 (January 19, 2017)

Page Range		6250-6252
FR Document		2017-01068

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the navigable waters of Pleasure Beach, Bridgeport, CT for Pleasure Beach Bridge. This temporary final rule is necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters. Entry into, transit through, mooring, or anchoring within the safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by Captain of the Port (COTP), Sector Long Island Sound.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 12 (Thursday, January 19, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6250-6252]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-01068]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2015-1088]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Pleasure Beach Bridge, Bridgeport, CT

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the 
navigable waters of Pleasure Beach, Bridgeport, CT for Pleasure Beach 
Bridge. This temporary final rule is necessary to provide for the 
safety of life on navigable waters. Entry into, transit through, 
mooring, or anchoring within the safety zone is prohibited unless 
authorized by Captain of the Port (COTP), Sector Long Island Sound.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from January 19, 
2017 until June 30, 2017. For the purposes of enforcement, actual 
notice will be used from January 1, 2017 until January 19, 2017.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2015-1088 and USCG-2015-1123 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click 
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with 
this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
contact Petty Officer Jay TerVeen, Prevention Department, U.S. Coast 
Guard Sector Long Island Sound, telephone (203) 468-4446, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
LIS Long Island Sound
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
NAD 83 North American Datum 1983

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    This rulemaking establishes a safety zone for the waters around 
Pleasure Beach Bridge, Bridgeport, CT. Corresponding regulatory history 
is discussed below.
    The Coast Guard was made aware on December 9, 2015, of damage to 
Pleasure Beach Bridge, the result of which created a hazard to 
navigation. On December 22, 2015, the Coast Guard published a temporary 
final rule entitled, ``Safety Zone; Pleasure Beach Bridge, Bridgeport, 
CT'' in the Federal Register (80 FR 79480). On June 23, 2016, the Coast 
Guard published a second temporary final rule entitled, ``Safety Zone; 
Pleasure Beach Bridge, Bridgeport, CT'' in the Federal Register (81 FR 
40814). On July 25, 2016, the Coast Guard published a third temporary 
final rule entitled, ``Safety Zone; Pleasure Beach Bridge, Bridgeport, 
CT'' in the Federal Register (81 FR 48329). The Coast Guard is issuing 
this temporary final rule without prior notice and opportunity to 
comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative 
Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an 
agency to issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment 
when the agency for good cause finds that those procedures are 
``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' 
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists 
for not publishing an NPRM with respect to this rule because doing so 
would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest. A solution 
to remedy the safety hazards associated with this bridge was initially 
projected to be completed prior to the expiration of the current safety 
zone, but has been delayed. It would be impracticable and contrary to 
the public interest to delay promulgating this rule, as it is necessary 
to protect the safety of waterway users.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), and for the 
same reasons stated in the preceding paragraph, the Coast Guard finds 
that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days 
after publication in the Federal Register.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The legal basis for this temporary rule is 33 U.S.C. 1231.
    On December 09, 2015, the Coast Guard was made aware of damage 
sustained to Pleasure Beach Bridge, Bridgeport, CT that has created a 
hazard to navigation. After further analysis of the bridge structure, 
the Coast Guard concluded that the overall condition of the structure 
created a continued hazard to navigation. The COTP Sector LIS has 
determined that the safety zone established by this temporary final 
rule is necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable 
waterways.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    The safety zone established by this rule will cover all navigable 
waters of the entrance channel to Johnsons Creek in the vicinity of 
Pleasure Beach Bridge, Bridgeport, CT. This safety zone will be bound 
inside an area that starts at a point on land at position 41-10.2 N., 
073-10.7 W. and then east along the shoreline to a point on land at 
position 41-9.57 N., 073-9.54 W. and then south across the channel to a 
point on land at position 41-9.52 N., 073-9.58 W. and then west along 
the shoreline to a point on land at position 41-9.52 N., 073-10.5 W. 
and then north across the channel back to the point of origin.
    This rule prohibits vessels from entering, transiting, mooring, or 
anchoring within the area specifically designated as a safety zone 
during the period of enforcement unless authorized by the COTP or 
designated representative.
    The Coast Guard will notify the public and local mariners of this 
safety zone through appropriate means, which may include, but are not 
limited to, publication in the Federal Register, the Local Notice to 
Mariners, and Broadcast Notice to Mariners.

[[Page 6251]]

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on these statutes and executive orders and we discuss First 
Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated 
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. 
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and 
Budget. The Coast Guard determined that this rulemaking is not a 
significant regulatory action for the following reasons: (1) Persons or 
vessels desiring to enter the safety zone may do so with permission 
from the COTP Sector LIS or a designated representative; and (2) the 
Coast Guard will notify the public of the enforcement of this rule via 
appropriate means, such as via Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast 
Notice to Mariners to increase public awareness of this safety zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any 
policy or action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
temporary rule involves the establishment of a safety zone. It is 
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of 
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis 
checklist supporting this determination, a Categorical Exclusion 
Determination, and EA Checklist, will be in the docket for review. We 
seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a 
significant environmental impact from this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; and Department of Homeland Security Delegation 
No. 0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T01-1088 to read as follows:

[[Page 6252]]

Sec.  165.T01-1088  Safety Zone; Pleasure Beach Bridge, Bridgeport, CT.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable 
waters of the entrance channel to Johnsons Creek in the vicinity of 
Pleasure Beach Bridge, Bridgeport, CT bound inside an area that starts 
at a point on land at position 41[deg]10'02.964'' N., 
073[deg]10'08.148'' W. and then east along the shoreline to a point on 
land at position 41[deg]09'57.996'' N., 073[deg]09'54.324'' W. and then 
south across the channel to a point on land at position 
41[deg]09'52.524'' N., 073[deg]09'58.861'' W. and then west along the 
shoreline to a point on land at position 41[deg]09'52.776'' N., 
073[deg]10'04.944'' W. and then north across the channel back to the 
point of origin.
    (b) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced from 12:00 
a.m. on January 1, 2017 to 12:00 a.m. June 30, 2017.
    (c) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section: A 
``designated representative'' is any commissioned, warrant, or petty 
officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has been designated by the Captain 
of the Port (COTP), Sector Long Island Sound, to act on his or her 
behalf. The designated representative may be on an official patrol 
vessel or may be on shore and will communicate with vessels via VHF-FM 
radio or loudhailer. ``Official patrol vessels'' may consist of any 
Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or local law enforcement 
vessels assigned or approved by the COTP Sector Long Island Sound. In 
addition, members of the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be present to inform 
vessel operators of this regulation.
    (d) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 
165.23 apply.
    (2) In accordance with the general regulations in 33 CFR 165.23, 
entry into or movement within this zone is prohibited unless authorized 
by the COTP, Long Island Sound.
    (3) Operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety zone 
should contact the COTP Sector Long Island Sound at 203-468-4401 
(Sector Sector Long Island Sound Command Center) or the designated 
representative via VHF channel 16 to obtain permission to do so.
    (4) Any vessel given permission to enter or operate in the safety 
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the COTP Sector 
Long Island Sound, or the designated on-scene representative.
    (5) Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio, 
flashing light or other means, the operator of the vessel shall proceed 
as directed.

    Dated: December 29, 2016.
A.E. Tucci,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Long Island 
Sound.
[FR Doc. 2017-01068 Filed 1-18-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 12 / Thursday, January 19, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 6251

V. Regulatory Analyses organization, or governmental that may result in the expenditure by a
We developed this rule after jurisdiction and you have questions State, local, or tribal government, in the
considering numerous statutes and concerning its provisions or options for aggregate, or by the private sector of
executive orders related to rulemaking. compliance, please contact the person $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
Below we summarize our analyses listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION more in any one year. Though this rule
CONTACT section. will not result in such an expenditure,
based on these statutes and executive
Small businesses may send comments we do discuss the effects of this rule
orders and we discuss First Amendment
on the actions of Federal employees elsewhere in this preamble.
rights of protestors.
who enforce, or otherwise determine
A. Regulatory Planning and Review compliance with, Federal regulations to F. Environment

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 the Small Business and Agriculture We have analyzed this rule under
direct agencies to assess the costs and Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Department of Homeland Security
benefits of available regulatory and the Regional Small Business Management Directive 023–01 and
alternatives and, if regulation is Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
necessary, to select regulatory Ombudsman evaluates these actions which guide the Coast Guard in
approaches that maximize net benefits. annually and rates each agency’s complying with the National
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the responsiveness to small business. If you Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
importance of quantifying both costs wish to comment on actions by U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
and benefits, of reducing costs, of employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– determined that this action is one of a
harmonizing rules, and of promoting 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The category of actions that do not
flexibility. This rule has not been Coast Guard will not retaliate against individually or cumulatively have a
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory small entities that question or complain significant effect on the human
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. about this proposed rule or any policy environment. This temporary rule
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed or action of the Coast Guard. involves the establishment of a safety
by the Office of Management and C. Collection of Information zone. It is categorically excluded from
Budget. The Coast Guard determined further review under paragraph 34(g) of
This rule will not call for a new Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
that this rulemaking is not a significant collection of information under the
regulatory action for the following Instruction. An environmental analysis
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 checklist supporting this determination,
reasons: (1) Persons or vessels desiring U.S.C. 3501–3520).
to enter the safety zone may do so with a Categorical Exclusion Determination,
permission from the COTP Sector LIS or D. Federalism and Indian Tribal and EA Checklist, will be in the docket
a designated representative; and (2) the Governments for review. We seek any comments or
Coast Guard will notify the public of the A rule has implications for federalism information that may lead to the
enforcement of this rule via appropriate under Executive Order 13132, discovery of a significant environmental
means, such as via Local Notice to Federalism, if it has a substantial direct impact from this rule.
Mariners and Broadcast Notice to effect on the States, on the relationship G. Protest Activities
Mariners to increase public awareness between the national government and
of this safety zone. the States, or on the distribution of The Coast Guard respects the First
power and responsibilities among the Amendment rights of protesters.
B. Impact on Small Entities Protesters are asked to contact the
various levels of government. We have
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of analyzed this rule under that Order and person listed in the FOR FURTHER
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, have determined that it is consistent INFORMATION CONTACT section to
requires Federal agencies to consider with the fundamental federalism coordinate protest activities so that your
the potential impact of regulations on principles and preemption requirements message can be received without
small entities during rulemaking. The described in Executive Order 13132. jeopardizing the safety or security of
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Also, this rule does not have tribal people, places, or vessels.
businesses, not-for-profit organizations implications under Executive Order List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
that are independently owned and 13175, Consultation and Coordination
operated and are not dominant in their with Indian Tribal Governments, Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
fields, and governmental jurisdictions because it does not have a substantial (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
with populations of less than 50,000. direct effect on one or more Indian requirements, Security measures,
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. tribes, on the relationship between the Waterways.
605(b) that this rule will not have a Federal Government and Indian tribes,
significant economic impact on a For the reasons discussed in the
or on the distribution of power and preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
substantial number of small entities. responsibilities between the Federal
While some owners or operators of CFR part 165 as follows:
Government and Indian tribes. If you
vessels intending to transit the safety believe this rule has implications for PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
zone may be small entities, for the federalism or Indian tribes, please AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
reasons stated in section V.A above, this contact the person listed in the FOR
rule will not have a significant FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section ■ 1. The authority citation for Part 165
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES

economic impact on any vessel owner above. continues to read as follows:
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Business Regulatory Enforcement The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
and Department of Homeland Security
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Delegation No. 0170.1.
we want to assist small entities in Federal agencies to assess the effects of
understanding this rule. If the rule their discretionary regulatory actions. In ■ 2. Add § 165.T01–1088 to read as
would affect your small business, particular, the Act addresses actions follows:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:34 Jan 18, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19JAR1.SGM 19JAR1

6252 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 12 / Thursday, January 19, 2017 / Rules and Regulations

§ 165.T01–1088 Safety Zone; Pleasure Dated: December 29, 2016. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Beach Bridge, Bridgeport, CT. A.E. Tucci,
(a) Location. The following area is a Regulatory Impact Analysis
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
safety zone: All navigable waters of the Port Sector Long Island Sound. Under Executive Order 12866, the
entrance channel to Johnsons Creek in [FR Doc. 2017–01068 Filed 1–18–17; 8:45 am] Secretary must determine whether this
the vicinity of Pleasure Beach Bridge, BILLING CODE 9110–04–P regulatory action is ‘‘significant’’ and,
Bridgeport, CT bound inside an area therefore, subject to the requirements of
that starts at a point on land at position the Executive order and subject to
41°10′02.964″ N., 073°10′08.148″ W. and review by the Office of Management and
then east along the shoreline to a point DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive
on land at position 41°09′57.996″ N., Order 12866 defines a ‘‘significant
073°09′54.324″ W. and then south 34 CFR Part 99 regulatory action’’ as an action likely to
across the channel to a point on land at result in a rule that may—
position 41°09′52.524″ N., Family Educational Rights and Privacy (1) Have an annual effect on the
073°09′58.861″ W. and then west along Act economy of $100 million or more, or
the shoreline to a point on land at adversely affect a sector of the economy,
position 41°09′52.776″ N., AGENCY: Office of the Chief Privacy
productivity, competition, jobs, the
073°10′04.944″ W. and then north across Officer, Office of Management,
environment, public health or safety, or
the channel back to the point of origin. Department of Education.
State, local, or tribal governments or
(b) Enforcement Period. This section ACTION: Final rule. communities in a material way (also
will be enforced from 12:00 a.m. on referred to as an ‘‘economically
January 1, 2017 to 12:00 a.m. June 30, SUMMARY: The Secretary amends the significant’’ rule);
2017. Family Educational Rights and Privacy (2) Create serious inconsistency or
(c) Definitions. The following Act (FERPA) regulations to change the otherwise interfere with an action taken
definitions apply to this section: A name of the office designated or planned by another agency;
‘‘designated representative’’ is any enforcement functions by the Secretary (3) Materially alter the budgetary
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer from the Family Policy Compliance impacts of entitlement grants, user fees,
of the U.S. Coast Guard who has been Office to the Office of the Chief Privacy or loan programs or the rights and
designated by the Captain of the Port Officer. The purpose of this amendment obligations of recipients thereof; or
(COTP), Sector Long Island Sound, to is to reflect additional resources
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
act on his or her behalf. The designated committed to protecting student privacy
arising out of legal mandates, the
representative may be on an official and to increase internal efficiency.
President’s priorities, or the principles
patrol vessel or may be on shore and DATES: These regulations are effective stated in the Executive order.
will communicate with vessels via February 21, 2017. This final regulatory action is not a
VHF–FM radio or loudhailer. ‘‘Official
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: significant regulatory action subject to
patrol vessels’’ may consist of any Coast
Kathleen Styles, U.S. Department of review by OMB under section 3(f) of
Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Executive Order 12866.
local law enforcement vessels assigned
Room 2E315, Washington, DC 20202. We have also reviewed these
or approved by the COTP Sector Long
Telephone: (855) 249–3072 or via email: regulations under Executive Order
Island Sound. In addition, members of
privacyTA@ed.gov. 13563, which supplements and
the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be
If you use a telecommunications explicitly reaffirms the principles,
present to inform vessel operators of
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text structures, and definitions governing
this regulation.
(d) Regulations. (1) The general telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay regulatory review established in
regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23 Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877– Executive Order 12866. To the extent
apply. 8339. permitted by law, Executive Order
(2) In accordance with the general 13563 requires that an agency—
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FERPA, 20 (1) Propose or adopt regulations only
regulations in 33 CFR 165.23, entry into U.S.C. 1232g(g), requires the Secretary
or movement within this zone is on a reasoned determination that their
to establish or designate an office within benefits justify their costs (recognizing
prohibited unless authorized by the the Department of Education
COTP, Long Island Sound. that some benefits and costs are difficult
(Department) for the purpose of to quantify);
(3) Operators desiring to enter or
investigating, processing, reviewing, (2) Tailor its regulations to impose the
operate within the safety zone should
and adjudicating violations and least burden on society, consistent with
contact the COTP Sector Long Island
complaints. As part of an expansion of obtaining regulatory objectives and
Sound at 203–468–4401 (Sector Sector
student privacy operations at the taking into account—among other things
Long Island Sound Command Center) or
Department, the designated office will and to the extent practicable—the costs
the designated representative via VHF
change from the Family Policy of cumulative regulations;
channel 16 to obtain permission to do
Compliance Office to the Office of the (3) In choosing among alternative
so.
(4) Any vessel given permission to Chief Privacy Officer. This change will regulatory approaches, select those
enter or operate in the safety zone must not directly impact the public. This approaches that maximize net benefits
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES

comply with all directions given to change is being made: (including potential economic,
them by the COTP Sector Long Island 1. To allow the Department to more environmental, public health and safety,
Sound, or the designated on-scene effectively make use of new resources and other advantages; distributive
representative. dedicated to student privacy; impacts; and equity);
(5) Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast 2. To permit efficiencies relating to (4) To the extent feasible, specify
Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing specialization of work; and performance objectives, rather than the
light or other means, the operator of the 3. To clarify responsibilities within behavior or manner of compliance a
vessel shall proceed as directed. the Department. regulated entity must adopt; and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:34 Jan 18, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19JAR1.SGM 19JAR1

Document Created: 2018-02-01 15:16:01
Document Modified: 2018-02-01 15:16:01

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective without actual notice from January 19, 2017 until June 30, 2017. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from January 1, 2017 until January 19, 2017.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, contact Petty Officer Jay TerVeen, Prevention Department, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Long Island Sound, telephone (203) 468-4446, email [email protected]
FR Citation		82 FR 6250
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

82 FR 6250 - Safety Zone; Pleasure Beach Bridge, Bridgeport, CT

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 12 (January 19, 2017)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard