| Page Range | 8469-8472 | |
| FR Document | 2017-01608 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 25, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 8469-8472] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-01608] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-79829; File No. SR-ISE-2016-29] Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, LLC; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change To Amend ISE Rule 723 and To Make Pilot Program Permanent January 18, 2017. I. Introduction On December 12, 2016, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (the ``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend the eligibility requirements for its Price Improvement Mechanism (``PIM'' or ``Auction'') and make permanent those aspects of the PIM that are currently operating on a pilot basis. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on December 16, 2016.\3\ The Commission received no comments regarding the proposal. This order approves the proposed rule change. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79530 (December 12, 2016), 81 FR 91221 (``Notice''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Description of the Proposal The Exchange established PIM in December 2004 as a price improvement mechanism.\4\ Pursuant to ISE Rule 723, an Electronic Access Member (``EAM'') may electronically submit for execution an order it represents as agent (``Agency Order'') against principal interest or against a solicited order for the full size of the Agency Order, provided it submits the Agency Order for electronic execution into the PIM (a ``Crossing Transaction''). Parts of the PIM are currently operating on a pilot basis (``Pilot''),\5\ which is set to expire on [[Page 8470]] January 18, 2017.\6\ The Exchange proposes to make the Pilot permanent, and also proposes to amend the Auction eligibility requirements for certain Agency Orders of less than 50 option contracts. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50819 (December 8, 2004), 69 FR 75093 (December 15, 2004) (SR-ISE-2003-06) (``PIM Approval Order''). \5\ Two components of PIM were approved by the Commission on a pilot basis: (1) The early conclusion of the PIM; and (2) no minimum size requirement of orders. \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78344 (July 15, 2016), 81 FR 47459 (July 21, 2016) (SR-ISE-2016-17) (``PIM July 2016 Extension''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. PIM Eligibility Requirements for Agency Orders of Fewer than 50 Contracts Currently, the PIM may be initiated if certain conditions are met. The Crossing Transaction must be entered only at a price that is equal to or better than the National Best Bid/Offer (``NBBO'') on the opposite side of the market from the Agency Order, and better than the limit order or quote on the ISE order book on the same side of the Agency Order.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See ISE Rule 723(b)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ISE proposes to amend ISE Rule 723(b) to require EAMs to provide at least $0.01 price improvement for an Agency Order if that order is for less than 50 option contracts and if the difference between the NBBO is $0.01. For the period beginning January 19, 2017 until a date specified by the Exchange in a Regulatory Information Circular, which date shall be no later than July 15, 2017, ISE will adopt a member conduct standard to implement this requirement.\8\ Under this provision, ISE is proposing to amend the Auction Eligibility Requirements to require that, if the Agency Order is for less than 50 option contracts, and if the difference between the NBBO is $0.01, an EAM shall not enter a Crossing Transaction unless such Crossing Transaction is entered at a price that is one minimum price improvement increment better than the NBBO on the opposite side of the market from the Agency Order, and better than any limit order on the limit order book on the same side of the market as the Agency Order. This requirement will apply regardless of whether the Agency Order is for the account of a public customer, or where the Agency Order is for the account of a broker dealer or any other person or entity that is not a Public Customer. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ The Exchange notes that its indirect parent company, U.S. Exchange Holdings, Inc. has been acquired by Nasdaq, Inc. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78119 (June 21, 2016), 81 FR 41611 (June 27, 2016) (SR-ISE-2016-11). Pursuant to this acquisition, ISE platforms are migrating to Nasdaq platforms, including the platform that operates PIM. ISE intends to retain the proposed member conduct standard requiring price improvement for options orders of under 50 contracts where the difference between the NBBO is $0.01 until the ISE platforms and the corresponding symbols are migrated to the platforms operated by Nasdaq, Inc. See Notice, supra note 3, at 91223 n.7. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- To enforce this requirement, ISE also proposes to add ISE Rule 1614(d)(4), which will provide that any member who enters an order into PIM for less than 50 contracts, while the difference between the NBBO is $0.01, must provide price improvement of at least one minimum price improvement increment better than the NBBO on the opposite side of the market from the Agency Order, which increment may not be smaller than $0.01. Failure to provide such price improvement will result in members being subject to the following fines: $500 for the second offense, $1,000 for the third offense, and $2,500 for the fourth offense. Subsequent offenses will subject the member to formal disciplinary action. The Exchange will review violations on a monthly cycle to assess these violations. This provision shall also be in effect for the period beginning January 19, 2017 until a date specified by the Exchange in a Regulatory Information Circular, which date shall be no later than September 15, 2017.\9\ The Exchange stated that it will conduct electronic surveillance of the PIM to ensure that members comply with the proposed price improvement requirements for option orders of less than 50 contracts.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ As noted above, ISE will be eliminating the member conduct standard requiring price improvement for options orders of under 50 contracts, where the difference between the NBBO is $0.01, by July 15, 2017. However, ISE Mercury, LLC (``ISE Mercury'') filed a rule change that adopts a similar member conduct standard, and that references proposed ISE Rule 1614(d)(4) as the means for enforcing its member conduct standard. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79539 (December 13, 2016), 81 FR 91982 (December 19, 2016) (SR- ISEMercury-2016-25). ISE Mercury proposed that its member conduct standard shall be in effect until a date specified by ISE Mercury in a Regulatory Information Circular, which date shall be no later than September 15, 2017. Accordingly, ISE is proposing that the date for eliminating Rule 1614(d)(4) shall be specified by the Exchange in a Regulatory Information Circular, which date shall be no later than until September 15, 2017. \10\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 91223. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange is also proposing a systems-based mechanism to implement this price improvement requirement, which shall be effective following the migration of a symbol to INET, the platform operated by Nasdaq, Inc. that will also operate the PIM.\11\ Under this provision, if the Agency Order is for less than 50 option contracts, and if the difference between the NBBO is $0.01, the Crossing Transaction must be entered at one minimum price improvement increment better than the NBBO on the opposite side of the market from the Agency Order and better than the limit order or quote on the ISE order book on the same side of the Agency Order. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See id. at 91224. See also proposed ISE Rule 723(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange will retain the current requirements for PIM eligibility in all other instances. Accordingly, if the Agency Order is for 50 option contracts or more or if the difference between the NBBO is greater than $0.01, the Crossing Transaction must be entered only at a price that is equal to or better than the NBBO and better than the limit order or quote on the ISE order book on the same side as the Agency Order. The Exchange believes that these changes to PIM may provide additional opportunities for Agency Orders of fewer than 50 option contracts to receive price improvement over the NBBO where the difference in the NBBO is $0.01.\12\ The Exchange notes that the statistics for the current pilot, which include, among other things, price improvement for orders of fewer than 50 option contracts under the current Auction eligibility requirements, show relatively small amounts of price improvement for such orders.\13\ ISE believes that the proposed requirements will therefore increase the price improvement that orders of fewer than 50 option contracts may receive in PIM.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 91224. \13\ See id. \14\ See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- B. Pilot Program Two components of the PIM were approved by the Commission on a pilot basis: (1) The early conclusion of the PIM; \15\ and (2) no minimum size requirement of orders. The provisions were approved for a pilot period that currently expires on January 18, 2017.\16\ The Exchange proposes to have the Pilot approved on a permanent basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ See ISE Rule 723(c)(5) and (d)(4). \16\ See PIM July 2016 Extension, supra note 6. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- During the Pilot period, the Exchange submitted certain data periodically as required by the Commission, to provide supporting evidence that, among other things, there is meaningful competition for all size orders, there is significant price improvement available through the PIM, and that there is an active and liquid market functioning on the Exchange outside of the Auction mechanism.\17\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See Supplementary Material .03 to ISE Rule 723. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. No Minimum Size Requirement Supplemental Material .03 to Rule 723 provides that, as part of the current Pilot, there will be no minimum size requirement for orders to be eligible for the Auction. The Exchange believes that the data gathered since the approval of [[Page 8471]] the Pilot, which it discussed in the Notice, establishes that there is liquidity and competition both within the PIM and outside of the PIM, and that there are opportunities for significant price improvement within the PIM.\18\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 91224-25. See also Exhibit 3 to SR-ISE-2016-29. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange compiled price improvement data in simple PIM orders from January through June 2016. For January 2016, where the order was on behalf of a Public Customer, the order was for 50 contracts or less, and ISE was at the NBBO, the most contracts traded (194,249) occurred when the spread was between $0.05 and $0.10.\19\ Of these, the greatest number of contracts (43,888) received no price improvement. When the spread was $0.01 for this same category, a total of 17,202 contracts traded; 16,032 contracts received no price improvement, and 1,170 received $0.01 price improvement.\20\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ According to the Exchange, this discussion of January 2016 data is illustrative of data that was gathered between January 2016 and July 2016. See Notice, supra note 3, at 91224 n.12. The complete underlying data for January 2016 through June 2016 was attached as Exhibits 3A and 3B to the Notice. \20\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 91224. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In comparison, in January 2016, where the order was on behalf of a Public Customer, and the order was for greater than 50 contracts, and ISE was at the NBBO, the most contracts traded (14,078) occurred where the spread was between $0.10 and $0.20. Of those contracts, the greatest number of contracts (6,254) received price improvement of $0.05 to $0.10, and 44 contracts received no price improvement.\21\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \21\ See id. at 91224-25. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In January 2016, where the order was on behalf of a Public Customer, the order was for 50 contracts or less, and ISE was not at the NBBO, the most contracts traded (76,326) occurred when the spread was between $0.05 and $0.10. Of these contracts, the greatest number of contracts (18,008) received no price improvement.\22\ In comparison, when the spread was $0.01 in this same category, a total of 17,687 contracts traded; 17,270 of those contracts received no price improvement, and 417 of those contracts received $0.01 price improvement.\23\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \22\ See id. at 91225. \23\ See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In comparison, in January 2016, where the order was on behalf of a Public Customer, the order was for greater than 50 contracts, and ISE was not at the NBBO, the most contracts traded (10,541) occurred when the spread was between $0.10 and $0.20. Of these contracts, the greatest number (3,738) received price improvement of $0.05 to $0.10.\24\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \24\ See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In January 2016, the greatest number of complex orders traded (2,139) traded when the spread was at $0.05. Of those orders, 181 represented orders of 50 or fewer contracts. During that period, the highest percentage (29.30%) of orders of greater than 50 contracts received $0.01 price improvement, and the highest percentage (20.4%) received no price improvement.\25\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \25\ See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ISE believes that the data gathered during the Pilot period indicates that there is meaningful competition in PIM auctions for all size orders, there is an active and liquid market functioning on the Exchange outside of the auction mechanism, and that, coupled with the proposed requirements for price improvement for options orders of under 50 contracts, there are opportunities for significant price improvement for orders executed through PIM.\26\ The Exchange therefore has requested that the Commission approve the no-minimum size requirement on a permanent basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\ See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Early Conclusion of the PIM Supplemental Material .05 to Rule 723 provides that Rule 723(c)(5) and Rule 723(d)(4), which relate to the termination of the exposure period by unrelated orders shall be part of the current Pilot. Rule 723(c)(5) provides that the exposure period will automatically terminate (i) at the end of the 500 millisecond period,\27\ (ii) upon the receipt of a market or marketable limit order on the Exchange in the same series, or (iii) upon the receipt of a nonmarketable limit order in the same series on the same side of the market as the Agency Order that would cause the price of the Crossing Transaction to be outside of the best bid or offer on the Exchange. Rule 723(d)(4) provides that, when a market order or marketable limit order on the opposite side of the market from the Agency Order ends the exposure period, it will participate in the execution of the Agency Order at the price that is mid-way between the best counter-side interest and the NBBO, so that both the market or marketable limit order and the Agency Order receive price improvement. Transactions will be rounded, when necessary, to the $0.01 increment that favors the Agency Order. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \27\ The Commission notes that, at the time of the filing of this proposal, the duration of the exposure period was 500 milliseconds. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68849 (February 6, 2013), 78 FR 9973 (February 12, 2013) (SR-ISE-2012- 100). The Exchange recently received approval to modify the exposure period to a time period designated by the Exchange of no less than 100 milliseconds and no more than one second. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79733 (January 4, 2017), 82 FR 3055 (January 10, 2017) (SR-ISE-2016-26). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As with the no minimum size requirement, the Exchange has gathered data on these three conditions to assess the effect of early PIM conclusions on the Pilot. For the period from January 2016 through June 2016, there were a total of 673 early terminated Auctions. The number of orders in early terminated PIM auctions constituted 0.15% of total PIM orders.\28\ There were a total of 9,595 contracts that traded through early terminated Auctions. The number of contracts in early terminated PIM auctions represented 0.13% of total PIM contracts.\29\ For complex orders, in January 2016, one order terminated early, and the PIM period upon termination was greater than or equal to 0.5 seconds.\30\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \28\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 91225. \29\ See id. \30\ See id. at 91226. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Based on the data gathered during the Pilot, the Exchange does not anticipate that any of these conditions will occur with significant frequency in either simple or complex orders, or will otherwise significantly affect the functioning of the PIM.\31\ The Exchange therefore has requested that the Commission approve this aspect of the Pilot on a permanent basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \31\ See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Discussion and Commission Findings After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange and, in particular, with Section 6(b) of the Act.\32\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\33\ which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in [[Page 8472]] general, to protect customers, issuers, brokers and dealers. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \32\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). \33\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As part of its proposal, the Exchange provided summary data on Exhibit 3 of its filing for the period January through June 2016, which the Exchange and Commission both publicly posted on their respective Web sites. Among other things, this data is useful in assessing the level of price improvement in the Auction, in particular for orders for fewer than 50 contracts; the degree of competition for order flow in such Auctions; and a comparison of liquidity in the Auctions with liquidity on the Exchange generally.\34\ Based on the data provided by the Exchange, the Commission believes that the Exchange's price improvement auction generally delivers a meaningful opportunity for price improvement to orders, including orders for fewer than 50 contracts, when the spread in the option is $0.02 or more. At the same time, as the Exchange has recognized, the data do not demonstrate that such orders have realized significant price improvement when the NBBO has a bid/ask differential of $0.01.\35\ Recognizing this, the Exchange has proposed to amend the Auction eligibility requirements to require the Initiating Participant to guarantee at least $0.01 of price improvement for Agency Orders of fewer than 50 contracts where the NBBO has a bid/ask differential of $0.01, whether or not the Exchange BBO is the same as the NBBO. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \34\ See Exhibit 3 to SR-ISE-2016-29. \35\ See Notice, supra note 3 at 91976. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange's proposal to modify the Auction eligibility requirements for orders of fewer than 50 contracts and seek permanent approval of the Pilot, as amended with the new provision, will, in the Commission's view, promote opportunities for price improvement for such orders when the NBBO is $0.01 wide, while continuing to provide opportunities for price improvement when spreads are wider than $0.01. In addition, the Commission has carefully evaluated the Pilot data and has determined that it would be beneficial to customers and to the options market as a whole to approve on a permanent basis the provisions concerning early conclusion of the PIM. The Commission notes that there have been few instances of early termination of the PIM. The Commission believes that, particularly for Auctions for fewer than 50 contracts when the bid/ask differential is wider than $0.01, the data provided by the Exchange support its proposal to make the Pilot permanent. The data demonstrate that the Auction generally provides price improvement opportunities to orders, including orders of retail customers and particularly when the bid/ask differential is wider than $0.01; that there is meaningful competition for orders on the Exchange; and that there exists an active and liquid market functioning on the Exchange outside of the Auction.\36\ The Commission further believes that the proposed revisions to the eligibility requirements for orders of fewer than 50 contracts with respect to circumstances when the NBBO is no more than $0.01 wide should help to enhance the operation of the Auction by providing meaningful opportunities for price improvement in such circumstances, and should benefit investors and others in a manner that is consistent with the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \36\ See Exhibit 3 to SR-ISE-2016-29. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission further notes that, as discussed more fully above, ISE is initially proposing to implement is price improvement requirement for Agency Orders of fewer than 50 option contracts where the difference in the NBBO is $0.01 with a member conduct standard.\37\ As described in greater detail above, ISE proposes to enforce this requirement under proposed ISE Rule 1614(d)(4). The Commission believes that ISE's proposed member conduct standard and its Rule 1614(d)(4) are reasonable means to implement the price improvement requirement until implementation of its proposed systems-based mechanism for this requirement, which will become effective following the migration of a symbol to INET, the platform operated by Nasdaq, Inc. that will also operate the PIM. The Commission further notes that the Exchange has represented that its proposed member conduct standard will be effective until the migration of all symbols to the INET platform, which shall be no later than July 15, 2017.\38\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \37\ The Exchange stated that it will conduct electronic surveillance of the PIM to ensure that members comply with the proposed price improvement requirements for option orders of fewer than 50 contracts. See Notice, supra note 3, at 91223. \38\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 91223 & n.7. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thus, the Commission has determined to approve the Exchange's proposed revisions to ISE Rule 723(b), Supplementary Material .03 and .05 to ISE Rule 723, and ISE Rule 1614(d), and to approve the Pilot, as proposed to be modified, on a permanent basis. IV. Conclusion It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\39\ that the proposed rule change (SR-ISE-2016-29), be and hereby is approved. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \39\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\40\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \40\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017-01608 Filed 1-24-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 8469 |