82 FR 8824 - Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Rescission of 2015-2016 Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 19 (January 31, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 19 (January 31, 2017)
| Page Range | 8824-8825 | |
| FR Document | 2017-01996 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 31, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 8824-8825] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-01996] [[Page 8824]] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-016] Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Rescission of 2015-2016 Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting a new shipper review (NSR) of the antidumping duty (AD) order on passenger vehicle and light truck tires (passenger tires) from the People's Republic of China (the PRC). The NSR covers one exporter/ producer of subject merchandise, Shandong Xinghongyuan Tire Co., Ltd. (SXT). The period of review (POR) is August 1, 2015, through January 31, 2016. The Department preliminarily determines that SXT did not satisfy the regulatory requirements to request an NSR, and, therefore, we are preliminarily rescinding this NSR. Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary results of this review. DATES: Effective January 31, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kaitlin Wojnar, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3857. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 6, 2016, the Department published notice of initiation of an NSR of passenger tires from the PRC for the period August 1, 2015, through January 31, 2016.\1\ On October 27, 2016, the Department extended the deadline for the preliminary results to January 23, 2017.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review; 2015-2016, 81 FR 36265 (June 6, 2016). \2\ See Department Memorandum, ``Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People's Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results in Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review,'' October 27, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The product covered by this order is passenger tires from the PRC. For a complete description of the scope, see the Appendix to this notice. On June 3, 2016, American Omni Trading Company, LLC (American Omni) and Unicorn Tire Corporation (Unicorn Tire) requested clarification of a prior ruling regarding the scope of the order.\3\ The Department issued a preliminary clarification on October 20, 2016,\4\ and subsequently received comments in support of the clarification from American Omni and Unicorn Tire.\5\ Accordingly, the Department finalized the clarification, with no modifications, on November 29, 2016.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Department Memorandum, ``Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People's Republic of China: Placing Scope Ruling Request on the Record,'' August 2, 2016, at Attachment. \4\ See Department Memorandum, ``Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Clarification of Scope Ruling,'' October 20, 2016. \5\ See Letter from American Omni and Unicorn Tire, ``Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People's Republic of China: Comments on Preliminary Clarification of Scope Ruling,'' October 27, 2016. \6\ See Department Memorandum, ``Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People's Republic of China: Final Clarification of Scope Ruling,'' November 29, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice.\7\ The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document that is available electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024, of the Department's main building. A complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can also be accessed at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Department Memorandum, ``Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Rescission of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review,'' January 23, 2017 (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Rescission of the Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review The Department preliminarily finds that, based on substantial evidence on the record, SXT has not satisfied the statutory and regulatory requirements to request an NSR. Specifically, the Department finds that SXT's request for an NSR was based on the inaccurately certified statement that SXT is not affiliated with any PRC exporter or producer that exported subject merchandise to the United States during the period of time examined in the original AD investigation (i.e., October 1, 2013, through March 31, 2014).\8\ Further analysis of SXT's corporate affiliations and the factual information underlying this preliminary rescission is provided in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People's Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, 80 FR 34893, 34894 (June 18, 2015); see also Letter from SXT, ``Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People's Republic of China: New Shipper Review Request,'' February 25, 2016, at Exhibit 2 (certifying that ``since the investigation was initiated, {SXT{time} has never been affiliated with any exporter or producer who exported the subject merchandise to the United States during the period of investigation including those not individually examined during the investigation''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public Comment Interested parties may submit case briefs or other written comments no later than 30 days after the publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register.\9\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be submitted no later than five days after the deadline for case briefs.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(i). \10\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request within 30 days of the publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register.\11\ Such requests should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, as well as the number of participants and a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral arguments will be limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a date, time, and location to be determined. Parties will be notified of the date, time, and location of any hearing. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parties must file their case briefs and rebuttal briefs, as well as any requests for a hearing, electronically, using ACCESS. Electronically filed documents must be successfully received in their entirety via ACCESS no later than 5:00 [[Page 8825]] p.m. Eastern Time on the abovementioned deadlines.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See 19 CFR 351.303(b)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department intends to issue the final results of this NSR, which will include an analysis of any issues raised in briefs, no more than 90 days after the release of these preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Act. Assessment Rates If the Department proceeds to a final rescission of SXT's NSR, the assessment rate to which SXT's shipments will be subject will not be affected by this review. The Department, however, initiated an administrative review of the AD order on passenger tires from the PRC covering numerous exporters for the period of January 27, 2015, through July 31, 2016, which encompasses the period covered by this NSR.\13\ Therefore, if the Department proceeds to a final rescission, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend subject merchandise exported by SXT and entered into the United States during the period August 1, 2015, through January 31, 2016, until CBP receives instructions relating to the abovementioned administrative review of this order. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 71061, 71065 (October 14, 2016) (Administrative Review Initiation Notice). Although SXT is not listed in the Administrative Review Initiation Notice, the company subsequently applied for a separate rate. See Letter from SXT, ``Administrative Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from China; Application for Separate Rate,'' November 14, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- If the Department does not proceed to a final rescission of this NSR, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we will calculate an importer- specific assessment rate based on the final results of this review. In accordance with the Department's assessment practice in non-market economy proceedings, however, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate entries that were not reported in SXT's U.S. sales database at the PRC-wide rate. Cash Deposit Requirements Effective upon publication of the final rescission or the final results of this NSR, the Department will instruct CBP to discontinue the option of posting bond or security in lieu of a cash deposit for entries of SXT's subject merchandise. If the Department proceeds to a final rescission of this NSR, the cash deposit rate for SXT will continue to be the PRC-wide rate because the Department will not have determined an individual dumping margin for SXT. If the Department issues final results for this NSR, the Department will instruct CBP to collect cash deposits, effective upon publication of the final results, at the rates established therein. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results in accordance with sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 771(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: January 23, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2017-01996 Filed 1-30-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![8824 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 31, 2017 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE On June 3, 2016, American Omni the record, SXT has not satisfied the
Trading Company, LLC (American statutory and regulatory requirements to
International Trade Administration Omni) and Unicorn Tire Corporation request an NSR. Specifically, the
(Unicorn Tire) requested clarification of Department finds that SXT’s request for
[A–570–016] an NSR was based on the inaccurately
a prior ruling regarding the scope of the
order.3 The Department issued a certified statement that SXT is not
Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck
preliminary clarification on October 20, affiliated with any PRC exporter or
Tires From the People’s Republic of
2016,4 and subsequently received producer that exported subject
China: Preliminary Rescission of 2015–
comments in support of the clarification merchandise to the United States during
2016 Antidumping Duty New Shipper
from American Omni and Unicorn the period of time examined in the
Review
Tire.5 Accordingly, the Department original AD investigation (i.e., October
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, finalized the clarification, with no 1, 2013, through March 31, 2014).8
International Trade Administration, modifications, on November 29, 2016.6 Further analysis of SXT’s corporate
Department of Commerce. affiliations and the factual information
Methodology underlying this preliminary rescission is
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (the Department) is The Department is conducting this provided in the Preliminary Decision
conducting a new shipper review (NSR) review in accordance with section Memorandum.
of the antidumping duty (AD) order on 751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
Public Comment
passenger vehicle and light truck tires 351.214. For a full description of the
methodology underlying our Interested parties may submit case
(passenger tires) from the People’s briefs or other written comments no
Republic of China (the PRC). The NSR conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum, which is hereby later than 30 days after the publication
covers one exporter/producer of subject of these preliminary results in the
merchandise, Shandong Xinghongyuan adopted by this notice.7 The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a Federal Register.9 Rebuttal briefs,
Tire Co., Ltd. (SXT). The period of limited to issues raised in the case
review (POR) is August 1, 2015, through public document that is available
electronically via Enforcement and briefs, may be submitted no later than
January 31, 2016. The Department five days after the deadline for case
preliminarily determines that SXT did Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized briefs.10
not satisfy the regulatory requirements Interested parties who wish to request
to request an NSR, and, therefore, we Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users a hearing must submit a written request
are preliminarily rescinding this NSR. within 30 days of the publication of
Interested parties are invited to at http://access.trade.gov and in the
Central Records Unit, Room B8024, of these preliminary results in the Federal
comment on the preliminary results of Register.11 Such requests should
this review. the Department’s main building. A
complete version of the Preliminary contain the party’s name, address, and
DATES: Effective January 31, 2017. telephone number, as well as the
Decision Memorandum can also be
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: accessed at http:// number of participants and a list of the
Kaitlin Wojnar, AD/CVD Operations, enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed issues to be discussed. Oral arguments
Office VII, Enforcement and Preliminary Decision Memorandum and will be limited to issues raised in the
Compliance, International Trade the electronic version of the Preliminary case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for
Administration, U.S. Department of Decision Memorandum are identical in a hearing is made, the Department
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue content. intends to hold the hearing at the U.S.
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: Department of Commerce, 1401
(202) 482–3857. Preliminary Rescission of the Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
Antidumping Duty New Shipper DC 20230, at a date, time, and location
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Review to be determined. Parties will be
Background The Department preliminarily finds notified of the date, time, and location
On June 6, 2016, the Department that, based on substantial evidence on of any hearing.
published notice of initiation of an NSR Parties must file their case briefs and
of passenger tires from the PRC for the 3 See Department Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping rebuttal briefs, as well as any requests
period August 1, 2015, through January Duty New Shipper Review of Passenger Vehicle and for a hearing, electronically, using
Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of ACCESS. Electronically filed documents
31, 2016.1 On October 27, 2016, the China: Placing Scope Ruling Request on the
Department extended the deadline for Record,’’ August 2, 2016, at Attachment.
must be successfully received in their
the preliminary results to January 23, 4 See Department Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping entirety via ACCESS no later than 5:00
2017.2 Duty New Shipper Review of Passenger Vehicle and
Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of 8 See Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain
Scope of the Order China: Preliminary Clarification of Scope Ruling,’’ Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the
October 20, 2016. People’s Republic of China: Final Determination of
The product covered by this order is 5 See Letter from American Omni and Unicorn Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative
passenger tires from the PRC. For a Tire, ‘‘Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, 80
complete description of the scope, see the People’s Republic of China: Comments on FR 34893, 34894 (June 18, 2015); see also Letter
Preliminary Clarification of Scope Ruling,’’ October from SXT, ‘‘Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light
the Appendix to this notice. 27, 2016. Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of China:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
6 See Department Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping New Shipper Review Request,’’ February 25, 2016,
1 See Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires Duty New Shipper Review of Passenger Vehicle and at Exhibit 2 (certifying that ‘‘since the investigation
from the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of was initiated, {SXT} has never been affiliated with
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review; 2015– China: Final Clarification of Scope Ruling,’’ any exporter or producer who exported the subject
2016, 81 FR 36265 (June 6, 2016). November 29, 2016. merchandise to the United States during the period
2 See Department Memorandum, ‘‘Passenger 7 See Department Memorandum, ‘‘Passenger of investigation including those not individually
Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People’s Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People’s examined during the investigation’’).
9 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(i).
Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Republic of China: Preliminary Rescission of
10 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1).
Preliminary Results in Antidumping Duty New Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review,’’ January
Shipper Review,’’ October 27, 2016. 23, 2017 (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 11 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:22 Jan 30, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM 31JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_8843/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 31, 2017 / Notices 8825
p.m. Eastern Time on the margin for SXT. If the Department FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
abovementioned deadlines.12 issues final results for this NSR, the Kaitlin Wojnar, AD/CVD Operations,
The Department intends to issue the Department will instruct CBP to collect Office VII, Enforcement and
final results of this NSR, which will cash deposits, effective upon Compliance, International Trade
include an analysis of any issues raised publication of the final results, at the Administration, U.S. Department of
in briefs, no more than 90 days after the rates established therein. Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
release of these preliminary results, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Notification to Importers (202) 482–3857.
Act. This notice serves as a preliminary SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Assessment Rates reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR Background
If the Department proceeds to a final 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate On June 6, 2016, the Department
rescission of SXT’s NSR, the assessment regarding the reimbursement of published notice of initiation of an NSR
rate to which SXT’s shipments will be antidumping duties prior to liquidation of passenger tires from the PRC for the
subject will not be affected by this of the relevant entries during this POR. period December 1, 2014, through
review. The Department, however, Failure to comply with this requirement January 31, 2016.1 On October 27, 2016,
initiated an administrative review of the could result in the Department’s the Department extended the deadline
AD order on passenger tires from the presumption that reimbursement of for the preliminary results to January 23,
PRC covering numerous exporters for antidumping duties occurred and the 2017.2
the period of January 27, 2015, through subsequent assessment of double
July 31, 2016, which encompasses the Scope of the Order
antidumping duties.
period covered by this NSR.13 We are issuing and publishing these The product covered by this order is
Therefore, if the Department proceeds to preliminary results in accordance with passenger tires from the PRC. For a
a final rescission, we will instruct U.S. sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 771(i)(1) of the complete description of the scope, see
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to Act. the Appendix to this notice.
continue to suspend subject On June 3, 2016, American Omni
merchandise exported by SXT and Dated: January 23, 2017. Trading Company, LLC (American
entered into the United States during Ronald K. Lorentzen, Omni) and Unicorn Tire Corporation
the period August 1, 2015, through Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement (Unicorn Tire) requested clarification of
January 31, 2016, until CBP receives and Compliance. a prior ruling regarding the scope of the
instructions relating to the [FR Doc. 2017–01996 Filed 1–30–17; 8:45 am] order.3 The Department issued a
abovementioned administrative review BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P preliminary clarification on October 20,
of this order. 2016,4 and subsequently received
If the Department does not proceed to comments in support of the clarification
a final rescission of this NSR, pursuant DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE from American Omni and Unicorn
to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we will Tire.5 Accordingly, the Department
calculate an importer-specific International Trade Administration finalized the clarification, with no
assessment rate based on the final modifications, on November 29, 2016.6
results of this review. In accordance [C–570–017]
with the Department’s assessment Methodology
practice in non-market economy Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck The Department is conducting this
proceedings, however, the Department Tires From the People’s Republic of review in accordance with section
will instruct CBP to liquidate entries China: Preliminary Rescission of 2014– 751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
that were not reported in SXT’s U.S. 2016 Countervailing Duty New Shipper 351.214. For a full description of the
sales database at the PRC-wide rate. Review
1 See Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires
Cash Deposit Requirements AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, from the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of
Effective upon publication of the final International Trade Administration, Countervailing Duty New Shipper Review; 2014–
rescission or the final results of this Department of Commerce. 2016, 81 FR 36262 (June 6, 2016).
2 See Department Memorandum, ‘‘Passenger
NSR, the Department will instruct CBP SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People’s
to discontinue the option of posting Commerce (the Department) is Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for
bond or security in lieu of a cash conducting a new shipper review (NSR) Preliminary Results in Countervailing Duty New
of the countervailing duty (CVD) order Shipper Review,’’ October 27, 2016.
deposit for entries of SXT’s subject 3 See Department Memorandum, ‘‘Countervailing
merchandise. If the Department on passenger vehicle and light truck
Duty New Shipper Review of Passenger Vehicle and
proceeds to a final rescission of this tires (passenger tires) from the People’s Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of
NSR, the cash deposit rate for SXT will Republic of China (the PRC). The NSR China: Placing Scope Ruling Request on the
continue to be the PRC-wide rate covers one exporter/producer of subject Record,’’ August 2, 2016, at Attachment.
4 See Department Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping
because the Department will not have merchandise, Shandong Xinghongyuan
Duty New Shipper Review of Passenger Vehicle and
determined an individual dumping Tire Co., Ltd. (SXT). The period of Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of
review (POR) is December 1, 2014, China: Preliminary Clarification of Scope Ruling,’’
12 See 19 CFR 351.303(b)(1). through January 31, 2016. The October 20, 2016.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
13 See Initiation of Antidumping and Department preliminarily determines 5 See Letter from American Omni and Unicorn
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR that SXT did not satisfy the regulatory Tire, ‘‘Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from
71061, 71065 (October 14, 2016) (Administrative the People’s Republic of China: Comments on
Review Initiation Notice). Although SXT is not
requirements to request an NSR, and, Preliminary Clarification of Scope Ruling,’’ October
listed in the Administrative Review Initiation therefore, we are preliminarily 27, 2016.
Notice, the company subsequently applied for a rescinding this NSR. Interested parties 6 See Department Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping
separate rate. See Letter from SXT, ‘‘Administrative are invited to comment on the Duty New Shipper Review of Passenger Vehicle and
Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Passenger Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic of
Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from China;
preliminary results of this review. China: Final Clarification of Scope Ruling,’’
Application for Separate Rate,’’ November 14, 2016. DATES: Effective January 31, 2017. November 29, 2016.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:22 Jan 30, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM 31JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_8843/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2017-01-31 00:19:50
Document Modified: 2017-01-31 00:19:50
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective January 31, 2017. | |
| Contact | Kaitlin Wojnar, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3857. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 8824 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR