82 FR 9158 - Findings of Failure To Submit State Implementation Plan Submittals for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 22 (February 3, 2017)
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 22 (February 3, 2017)
| Page Range | 9158-9164 | |
| FR Document | 2017-02188 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 22 (Friday, February 3, 2017)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 9158-9164] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-02188] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR PART 52 [EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0646; FRL-9958-70-OAR] Findings of Failure To Submit State Implementation Plan Submittals for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finding that 15 states and the District of Columbia have failed to submit State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions in a timely manner to satisfy certain requirements for the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) that apply to nonattainment areas and/or states in the Ozone Transport Region (OTR). As explained in this action, consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA regulations, these findings of failure to submit establish certain deadlines for the imposition of sanctions, if a state does not submit a timely SIP revision addressing the requirements for which the finding is being made, and for the EPA to promulgate a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to address any outstanding SIP requirements. DATE: The effective date of this action is March 6, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: General questions concerning this notice should be addressed to Mr. Stephen Senter, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Policy Division, Mail Code: C504-2, 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709; by telephone (919) 541-3042; or by email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Notice and Comment Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) Section 553 of the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that notice and public procedures are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing notice and an opportunity for public comment. The EPA has determined that there is good cause for making this final agency action without prior proposal and opportunity for comment because no significant EPA judgment is involved in making a finding of failure to submit [[Page 9159]] SIPs, or elements of SIPs, because the finding is required by the CAA where states have made no submissions to meet the SIP requirements, or where the EPA has separately determined that they made incomplete submissions. Thus, notice and public procedures are unnecessary. The EPA finds that this constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information? The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0646. All documents in the docket are listed on http://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information or information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form through http://www.regulations.gov. C. Where do I go if I have a specific state question? For questions related to specific states mentioned in this notice, please contact the appropriate EPA Regional office: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Regional offices States ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EPA Region 1: Anne Arnold, Chief, Air Connecticut, Maine, Quality Planning Unit, EPA Region 1, 1 Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston, Rhode Island, Vermont. MA 02203. EPA Region 2: Rick Ruvo, Chief, Air New Jersey. Program Branch, EPA Region 2, 290 Broadway, New York, NY 10007. EPA Region 3: Maria Pino, Acting Delaware, District of Columbia, Associate Director, Office of Air Maryland, Pennsylvania, Program Planning, EPA Region 3, 1650 Virginia. Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103. EPA Region 5: John Mooney, Chief, Air Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin. Programs Branch, EPA Region 5, 77 West Jackson Street, Chicago, IL 60604. EPA Region 9: Doris Lo, Chief, Air California. Planning Office, EPA Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ D. How is the preamble organized? Table of Contents I. General Information A. Notice and Comment Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information? C. Where do I go if I have specific state questions? D. How is the preamble organized? II. Background III. Consequences of a Finding of Failure To Submit IV. Findings of Failure To Submit for States That Failed To Make a Nonattainment Area and/or Ozone Transport Region SIP Submittal V. Environmental Justice Considerations VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health and Safety Risks H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority and Low-Income Populations K. Congressional Review Act (CRA) L. Judicial Review II. Background On March 27, 2008, the EPA issued its final action to revise the NAAQS for ozone to establish new 8-hour standards.\1\ In that action, the EPA promulgated identical revised primary and secondary ozone standards, designed to protect public health and welfare, of 0.075 parts per million (ppm).\2\ Those standards are met when the 3-year average of the annual fourth highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentration is less than or equal to 0.075 ppm.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 73 FR 16436. \2\ Since the 2008 primary and secondary NAAQS for ozone are identical, for convenience, we refer to both as ``the 2008 ozone NAAQS'' or ``the 2008 ozone standard.'' \3\ 40 CFR 50.15. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Promulgation of a revised NAAQS triggers a requirement for the EPA to designate areas of the country as nonattainment, attainment, or unclassifiable for the standards; for ozone NAAQS, this also involves classifying any nonattainment areas at the time of designation.\4\ Ozone nonattainment areas are classified based on the severity of their ozone levels (as determined based on the area's ``design value,'' which represents air quality in the area for the most recent 3 years). The possible classifications for ozone nonattainment areas are Marginal, Moderate, Serious, Severe, and Extreme.\5\ Nonattainment areas with a ``lower'' classification have ozone levels that are closer to the standard than areas with a ``higher'' classification.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ CAA sections 107(d)(1) and 181(a)(1). \5\ CAA section 181(a)(1). \6\ See 40 CFR 51.1103 for the design value thresholds for each classification for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On May 21, 2012, and June 11, 2012, the EPA issued rules designating 46 areas throughout the country as nonattainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, effective July 20, 2012, and establishing classifications for the designated nonattainment areas.\7\ Areas designated nonattainment for the ozone NAAQS are subject to the general nonattainment area planning requirements of CAA section 172 and also to the ozone-specific planning requirements of CAA section 182. States in the OTR are additionally subject to the requirements outlined in CAA section 184. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ 77 FR 30088 (May 21, 2012) and 77 FR 34221 (June 11, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ozone nonattainment areas in the lower classification levels have fewer and/or less stringent mandatory air quality planning and control requirements than those in higher classifications. For a Marginal area, a state is required to submit a baseline emissions inventory and adopt a SIP requiring emissions statements from stationary sources and implementing a Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) program for the relevant ozone standard.\8\ For a Moderate area, a state needs to comply with the Marginal area requirements, plus additional requirements, including the requirement to submit a demonstration that the area will attain in 6 years, the requirement to [[Page 9160]] adopt and implement certain emissions controls, such as Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT), and the requirement for greater emissions offsets for new or modified major stationary sources under the state's NNSR program. For each higher ozone nonattainment classification, a state needs to comply with all lower area classification requirements, plus additional emissions controls and more expansive NNSR offset requirements. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ CAA section 182(a). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The CAA sets out specific requirements for states in the OTR.\9\ Upon promulgation of the 2008 ozone NAAQS, states in the OTR were required to submit a SIP revision for RACT.\10\ This requirement is the only recurring obligation for an OTR state upon revision of a NAAQS, unless that state also contains some portion of a nonattainment area for the revised NAAQS. In that case, the nonattainment requirements described above also apply to those portions of that state. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ CAA section 184 details specific requirements for a group of states (and the District of Columbia) that make up the OTR. States in the OTR are required to submit RACT SIP revisions and mandate a certain level of emissions control for the pollutants that form ozone, even if the areas in the state meet the ozone standards. \10\ 40 CFR 51.1116. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On March 6, 2015, the EPA established a final implementation rule for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule).\11\ The purpose of that action was to detail the requirements applicable to ozone nonattainment areas, as well as requirements that apply in the OTR, and provide specific deadlines for SIP submittals. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ 80 FR 12264. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reasonably Available Control Technology Subpart 1 of part D of title I of the CAA includes a requirement that the SIP for a nonattainment area must provide for the implementation of all reasonably available control measures (otherwise referred to as Reasonably Available Control Measures) as expeditiously as practicable to meet a given NAAQS, including such emissions reductions that may be obtained through implementation of RACT. Under the provisions of Subpart 2 of part D of title I of the CAA, states with ozone nonattainment areas classified Moderate and higher must adopt RACT rules for all volatile organic compounds (VOC) sources covered by existing or new Control Technique Guidelines (CTGs),\12\ and for all other major stationary sources of VOC and nitrogen oxide (NOX ).\13\ This same requirement applies to states with affected sources in the OTR.\14\ The RACT SIP requirements for states with nonattainment areas and states in the OTR are codified for the 2008 ozone NAAQS in 40 CFR 51.1112 and 51.1116(b), respectively, and require that RACT SIP revisions be submitted no later than 24 months after the effective date of area designations for the 2008 standards (i.e., July 20, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ CTGs provide the EPA's recommendations on how to control emissions of VOC from a specific type of product or process (source category) in an ozone nonattainment area. Each CTG includes emissions limitations based on RACT. RACT emissions limitations are the lowest emissions limitations that a particular source is capable of meeting by the application of control technology that is reasonably available considering technological and economic feasibility. Air agencies responsible for ozone nonattainment areas or areas in the OTR must evaluate the recommendations provided in the CTG and determine if it is necessary to modify their existing regulations or create new regulations to meet the CAA's RACT requirements. See Web site: https://www3.epa.gov/airtoxics/ctg_act.html. \13\ To clarify, this notice does not make any findings with respect to SIP revisions that were required upon EPA's issuance of specific CTGs in 2006, 2007, 2008 or other years. In issuing those CTGs, the EPA established a separate set of SIP revision deadlines (as required by CAA section 182(b)(2)), and these deadlines are not associated with or triggered by the issuance of revised ozone NAAQS in 1997 or 2008. The findings in this notice pertain only to those SIP revisions triggered by the promulgation of a revised ozone NAAQS in 2008. \14\ CAA section 184(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nonattainment New Source Review NNSR is a preconstruction review permit program that applies to new major stationary sources or major modifications at existing sources located in a nonattainment area.\15\ The specific NNSR requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS are located in 40 CFR 51.160-165. The 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule explained that, for each nonattainment area, a NNSR plan or plan revision was due no later than 36 months after the effective date of area designations for the 2008 standards (i.e., July 20, 2015).\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ CAA sections 172(c)(5), 173 and 182. \16\ With respect to states with nonattainment areas subject to a finding of failure to submit NNSR SIP revisions, such revisions would no longer be required if the area were redesignated to attainment. The CAA's Prevention of Significant Deterioration program requirements apply in lieu of NNSR after an area is redesignated to attainment. For areas outside the OTR, NNSR requirements do not apply in areas designated as attainment. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Basic Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Consistent with the applicable provisions under CAA section 182(b)(4), ozone nonattainment areas with urbanized populations of 200,000 or more based upon the 1990 United States Census that are classified as Moderate are subject to requirements to implement a basic vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program, for which a new submittal or plan revision is due at the same time as the attainment demonstration, which was 3 years after the effective date of designation for a Moderate area (i.e., July 20, 2015).\17\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ 40 CFR 51.372(b)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Transportation Control Measures To Offset Growth in Emissions From Growth in Vehicle Miles Traveled Consistent with CAA section 182(d)(1)(A), Severe and higher ozone nonattainment areas must submit an analysis to determine if emissions have increased due to growth in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) or vehicle trips. If the VMT analysis shows that a growth in emissions has occurred, the subject area must develop and submit a new plan or a plan revision with specific enforceable transportation control measures (TCMs) to offset that growth in emissions. For such areas, a new submittal or plan revision was due 2 years after the effective date of area designation (i.e., July 20, 2014). Clean Fuels for Boilers For ozone nonattainment areas classified as Extreme, section 182(e)(3) of the CAA outlines requirements for new, modified, and existing electric utility, industrial, and commercial boilers that emit more than 25 tons per year of NOX . Such facilities must use a low polluting fuel as its primary fuel source (e.g., natural gas, methane, ethanol) or use advanced control technology for NOX emissions reductions. For such areas, a new submittal or plan revision was due 3 years after the effective date of area designation (i.e., July 20, 2015). III. Consequences of a Finding of Failure To Submit For plan requirements under subpart D, title I of the CAA, such as those for ozone nonattainment areas and areas in the OTR, if the EPA finds that a state has failed to make the required SIP submittal or that a submitted SIP is incomplete, then CAA section 179(a) establishes specific consequences, including the eventual imposition of mandatory sanctions for the affected area. Additionally, such a finding triggers an obligation under CAA section 110(c) for the EPA to promulgate a FIP no later than 2 years from the finding of failure to submit a complete SIP, if the affected state has not submitted, and the EPA has not approved, the required SIP submittal. If the EPA has not affirmatively determined that a state has submitted a [[Page 9161]] complete SIP addressing the deficiency that is the basis for the finding within 18 months of the effective date of this rulemaking, then pursuant to CAA section 179(a) and (b) and 40 CFR 52.31 the offset sanction identified in CAA section 179(b)(2) will apply in the affected nonattainment area. If the EPA has not affirmatively determined that the state has submitted a complete SIP addressing the deficiency that is the basis for the finding within 6 months after the offset sanction is imposed, then the highway funding sanction will apply in the affected nonattainment area, in accordance with CAA section 179(b)(1) and 40 CFR 52.31. If the state does not make the required SIP submittal and the EPA does not take final action to approve the submittal within 2 years of the effective date of these findings, the EPA is required to promulgate a FIP, pursuant to CAA section 179(a) and 40 CFR 52.31 for the affected nonattainment area. IV. Findings of Failure To Submit for States That Failed To Make a Nonattainment Area and/or Ozone Transport Region SIP submittal Based on a review of SIP submittals received and deemed complete as of the date of this action, the EPA is finding that the states and areas listed in the tables below have failed to submit specific SIP element(s) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS required under subpart 2 of part D of title 1 of the CAA and the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule. Table 1--Findings of Failure To Submit Certain Required SIP Elements for 2008 Ozone NAAQS Nonattainment Areas ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Region State Area name Required SIP element ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1............................... CT Greater Connecticut................... Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 1............................... CT New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island.... Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 1............................... MA Dukes County.......................... Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 2............................... NJ New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island.... Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 2............................... NJ Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City. Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 3............................... DC Washington............................ Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 3............................... DE Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City. Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 3............................... DE Seaford............................... Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 3............................... MD Baltimore............................. I/M Basic. 3............................... MD Baltimore............................. Nonattainment NSR rules--Moderate. 3............................... MD Baltimore............................. NOX RACT for Major Sources. 3............................... MD Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City. Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 3............................... MD Washington............................ Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 3............................... PA Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton............ Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 3............................... PA Lancaster............................. Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 3............................... PA Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City. Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 3............................... PA Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley.............. Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 3............................... PA Reading............................... Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 3............................... VA Washington............................ Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 5............................... IL Chicago-Naperville.................... Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 5............................... IL St. Louis-St. Charles-Farmington...... Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 5............................... IN Chicago-Naperville.................... Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 5............................... IN Cincinnati............................ Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 5............................... WI Chicago-Naperville.................... Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 5............................... WI Sheboygan County...................... Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 9............................... CA Calaveras County...................... Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 9............................... CA Kern County (Eastern Kern)............ Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 9............................... CA Los Angeles-San Bernardino Counties Nonattainment NSR (Antelope Valley & Mojave Desert air rules--Severe 15. districts). 9............................... CA Los Angeles-San Bernardino Counties VMT--TCMs to Offset (Antelope Valley & Mojave Desert air Growth. districts). 9............................... CA Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin..... Clean Fuels for Boilers. 9............................... CA Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin..... Nonattainment NSR rules--Extreme. 9............................... CA Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin..... VMT--TCMs to Offset Growth. 9............................... CA Mariposa County....................... Nonattainment NSR rules--Marginal. 9............................... CA Riverside County (Coachella Valley)... Nonattainment NSR rules--Severe 15. 9............................... CA Riverside County (Coachella Valley)... VMT--TCMs to Offset Growth. 9............................... CA Sacramento Metro (Sacramento)......... Non-CTG VOC RACT for Major Sources. 9............................... CA Sacramento Metro (Sacramento)......... NOX RACT for Major Sources. 9............................... CA Sacramento Metro (Sacramento)......... CTG VOC RACT (for all 44 CTGs *). 9............................... CA Sacramento Metro (Yolo Solano)........ Nonattainment NSR rules--Severe 15. 9............................... CA Sacramento Metro (Yolo Solano)........ Non-CTG VOC RACT for Major Sources. 9............................... CA Sacramento Metro (Yolo Solano)........ NOX RACT for Major Sources. 9............................... CA Sacramento Metro (Yolo Solano)........ CTG VOC RACT (for all 44 CTGs *). 9............................... CA Sacramento Metro...................... VMT--TCMs to Offset Growth. 9............................... CA San Joaquin Valley.................... Nonattainment NSR rules--Extreme. [[Page 9162]] 9............................... CA Ventura County........................ Nonattainment NSR rules--Serious. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * A listing in the chart for ``all 44 CTGs'' or particular CTG does not mean that the state or area has failed to meet a plan submission requirement triggered by the issuance of any particular CTG. The findings in this notice pertain only to those SIP revisions triggered by the promulgation of a revised ozone NAAQS in 2008. In other words, consistent with CAA sections 182(b)(2) and 184(b)(1)(B), and 40 CFR 51.1112 and 51.1116, inclusion in this table means that the state or area listed has failed to submit to the EPA a RACT submittal per the 2008 ozone NAAQS to address the sources covered by a CTG. The 44 VOC RACT CTGs that are relevant for purposes of the 2008 ozone NAAQS are for the following source categories: Aerospace; Auto and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings (2008); Bulk Gasoline Plants; Equipment Leaks from Natural Gas/Gasoline Processing Plants; Factory Surface Coating of Flat Wood Paneling; Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials (2008); Flat Wood Paneling Coatings (2006); Flexible Packaging Printing Materials (2006); Fugitive Emissions from Synthetic Organic Chemical Polymer and Resin Manufacturing Equipment; Graphic Arts--Rotogravure and Flexography; Industrial Cleaning Solvents (2006); Large Appliance Coatings (2007); Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners; Leaks from Gasoline Tank Trucks and Vapor Collection Systems; Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment; Lithographic Printing Materials and Letterpress Printing Materials (2006); Manufacture of High-Density Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and Polystyrene Resins; Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires; Manufacture of Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products; Metal Furniture Coatings (2007); Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives (2008); Miscellaneous Metal Products Coatings (2008); Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings (2007); Petroleum Liquid Storage in External Floating Roof Tanks; Plastic Parts Coatings (2008); Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems, Wastewater Separators, and Process Unit Turnarounds; Shipbuilding/repair; SOCMI Air Oxidation Processes; SOCMI Distillation and Reactor Processes; Solvent Metal Cleaning; Stage I Vapor Control Systems--Gasoline Service Stations; Storage of Petroleum Liquids in Fixed Roof Tanks; Surface Coating for Insulation of Magnet Wire; Surface Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks; Surface Coating of Cans; Coating of Coils; Surface Coating of Fabrics; Surface Coating of Large Appliances; Surface Coating of Metal Furniture; Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products; Coating of Paper; Tank Truck Gasoline Loading Terminals; Use of Cutback Asphalt; Wood Furniture. Table 2--Findings of Failure To Submit Certain Required SIP Elements for States in the Ozone Transport Region ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EPA region State Required SIP element ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1............................... MA Non-CTG VOC RACT for Major Sources. 1............................... MA NOX RACT for Major Sources. 1............................... MA CTG VOC RACT (for all 44 CTGs *). 1............................... ME Non-CTG VOC RACT for Major Sources. 1............................... ME CTG VOC RACT (for all 44 CTGs *). 1............................... NH Non-CTG VOC RACT for Major Sources. 1............................... NH NOX RACT for Major Sources. 1............................... NH CTG VOC RACT (for all 44 CTGs *). 1............................... RI Non-CTG VOC RACT for Major Sources. 1............................... RI NOX RACT for Major Sources. 1............................... RI CTG VOC RACT (for all 44 CTGs *). 1............................... VT Non-CTG VOC RACT for Major Sources. 1............................... VT NOX RACT for Major Sources. 1............................... VT CTG VOC RACT (for all 44 CTGs *). 2............................... NJ CTG VOC RACT Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials (2008). 2............................... NJ CTG VOC RACT Miscellaneous Metal Products Coatings (2008). 2............................... NJ CTG VOC RACT Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings (2007). 2............................... NJ CTG VOC RACT Plastic Parts Coatings (2008). 2............................... NJ CTG VOC RACT Industrial Cleaning Solvents (2006). 3............................... DC NOX RACT for Major Sources. 3............................... DC CTG VOC RACT (for all 44 CTGs *). 3............................... DC Non-CTG VOC RACT for Major Sources. 3............................... MD NOX RACT for Major Sources. 3............................... PA CTG VOC RACT (for all 44 CTGs *). 3............................... VA Non-CTG VOC RACT for Major Sources. 3............................... VA NOX RACT for Major Sources. 3............................... VA CTG VOC RACT (for all 44 CTGs *). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * See the explanation after Table 1. V. Environmental Justice Considerations The EPA believes that the human health or environmental risks addressed by this action will not have disproportionately high or adverse human health or environmental effects on minority, low-income, or indigenous populations because it does not directly affect the level of protection provided to human health or environment under the ozone NAAQS. The purpose of this rule is to make findings that states named have failed to provide the identified SIP submissions to the EPA that are required per the CAA for purposes of implementing the 2008 ozone NAAQS. As such, this action does not directly affect the level of protection provided for human health or the environment. Moreover, it is intended that the actions and deadlines resulting from this notice will in fact lead to greater protection for U.S. citizens, including minority, low-income, or indigenous populations, by ensuring that states meet their statutory obligation to develop and submit SIPs to ensure that areas make progress toward attaining the 2008 ozone NAAQS. [[Page 9163]] VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review This action is not a significant regulatory action and was, therefore, not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) This action does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the PRA. This final rule does not establish any new information collection requirement apart from what is already required by law. This rule relates to the requirement in the CAA for states to submit SIPs under sections 172, 182, and 184 which address the statutory requirements that apply to areas designated as nonattainment for the ozone NAAQS and to states within the Ozone Transport Region, respectively. C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) I certify that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This action will not impose any requirements on small entities. The rule is a finding that the named states have not submitted the necessary SIP revisions. D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in UMRA 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state, local or tribal governments or the private sector. E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments This action does not have tribal implications as specified in Executive Order 13175. This rule finds that several states have failed to submit SIP revisions that satisfy the nonattainment area planning requirements under sections 172 and 182 of the CAA, and the OTR requirements under section 184 of the CAA for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. No tribe is subject to the requirement to submit an implementation plan under section 172 or under subpart 5 of part D of Title I of the CAA. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action. G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health and Safety Risks The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern health or safety risks that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it is a finding that several states have failed to submit SIP revisions that satisfy the nonattainment area planning requirements under sections 172 and 182 of the CAA, and the OTR requirements under Section 184 for the 2008 ozone NAAQS and does not directly or disproportionately affect children. H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act This rulemaking does not involve technical standards. J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations The EPA believes the human health or environmental risk addressed by this action will not have potential disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority, low-income, or indigenous populations. In finding that several states have failed to submit SIP revisions that satisfy the nonattainment area planning requirements under sections 172 and 182 of the CAA, and the OTR requirements under section 184 of the CAA for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, this action does not directly affect the level of protection provided to human health or the environment. The results of this evaluation are contained in Section V of this preamble titled ``Environmental Justice Considerations.'' K. Congressional Review Act (CRA) This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). L. Judicial Review Section 307(b)(l) of the CAA indicates which Federal Courts of Appeal have venue for petitions of review of final agency actions by the EPA under the CAA. This section provides, in part, that petitions for review must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (i) when the agency action consists of ``nationally applicable regulations promulgated, or final actions taken, by the Administrator,'' or (ii) when such action is locally or regionally applicable, if ``such action is based on a determination of nationwide scope or effect and if in taking such action the Administrator finds and publishes that such action is based on such a determination.'' The EPA has determined that this final rule consisting of findings of failure to submit certain of the required SIP revisions is ``nationally applicable'' within the meaning of section 307(b)(1). This final agency action affects 15 states with nonattainment areas and/or in the OTR, located in five of the 10 EPA Regional offices, and in 6 different federal circuits. In addition, the EPA has determined that this rule has nationwide scope or effect because it addresses a common core of knowledge and analysis involved in formulating the decision and a common interpretation of the requirements of 40 CFR 51 appendix V applied to determining the completeness of SIPs in states across the country. This determination is appropriate because, in the 1977 CAA Amendments that revised CAA section 307(b)(l), Congress noted that the Administrator's determination that an action is of ``nationwide scope or effect'' would be appropriate for any action that has ``scope or effect beyond a single judicial circuit.'' H.R. Rep. No. 95-294 at 323-324, reprinted in 1977 U.S.C.C.A.N. 1402-03. Here, the scope and effect of this action extends to the 6 judicial circuits that include the states across the country affected by this action. In these circumstances, section 307(b)(1) and its legislative history authorize the Administrator to find the rule to be of ``nationwide scope or effect'' and, thus, to indicate that venue for challenges lies in the District of Columbia Circuit. Accordingly, the EPA [[Page 9164]] is determining that this rule is of nationwide scope or effect. Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit within 60 days from the date this final action is published in the Federal Register. Filing a petition for review by the Administrator of this final action does not affect the finality of the action for the purposes of judicial review, nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review must be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Approval and promulgation of implementation plans, Administrative practice and procedures, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, and Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: January 13, 2017. Gina McCarthy, Administrator. [FR Doc. 2017-02188 Filed 2-2-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![9158 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 22 / Friday, February 3, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, is published in the Federal Register. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
January 21, 2011); This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as AGENCY
• Does not impose an information defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
collection burden under the provisions 40 CFR PART 52
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
petitions for judicial review of this [EPA–HQ–OAR–2016–0646; FRL–9958–70–
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); OAR]
• Is certified as not having a action must be filed in the United States
significant economic impact on a Court of Appeals for the appropriate
Findings of Failure To Submit State
substantial number of small entities circuit by April 4, 2017. Filing a petition
Implementation Plan Submittals for the
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 for reconsideration by the Administrator 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); of this final rule does not affect the Quality Standards (NAAQS)
• Does not contain any unfunded finality of this action for the purposes of
mandate or significantly or uniquely judicial review nor does it extend the AGENCY: Environmental Protection
affect small governments, as described time within which a petition for judicial Agency (EPA).
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act review may be filed, and shall not ACTION: Final rule.
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); postpone the effectiveness of such rule
• Does not have Federalism SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
or action. This action may not be
implications as specified in Executive Agency (EPA) is finding that 15 states
challenged later in proceedings to
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, and the District of Columbia have failed
enforce its requirements. (See CAA to submit State Implementation Plan
1999); section 307(b)(2).)
• Is not an economically significant (SIP) revisions in a timely manner to
regulatory action based on health or List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 satisfy certain requirements for the 2008
safety risks subject to Executive Order ozone National Ambient Air Quality
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Environmental protection, Air Standards (NAAQS) that apply to
• Is not a significant regulatory action pollution control, Incorporation by nonattainment areas and/or states in the
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone Transport Region (OTR). As
28355, May 22, 2001); Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and explained in this action, consistent with
• Is not subject to requirements of recordkeeping requirements, Volatile the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA
Section 12(d) of the National organic compounds. regulations, these findings of failure to
Technology Transfer and Advancement submit establish certain deadlines for
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because the imposition of sanctions, if a state
application of those requirements would Dated: January 17, 2017. does not submit a timely SIP revision
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; Debra H. Thomas, addressing the requirements for which
and Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8. the finding is being made, and for the
• Does not provide the EPA with the EPA to promulgate a Federal
discretionary authority to address, as 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: Implementation Plan (FIP) to address
appropriate, disproportionate human any outstanding SIP requirements.
health or environmental effects, using PART 52—APPROVAL AND DATE: The effective date of this action is
practicable and legally permissible PROMULGATION OF March 6, 2017.
methods, under Executive Order 12898 IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). General questions concerning this
In addition, the SIP does not apply on ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 notice should be addressed to Mr.
any Indian reservation land or in any continues to read as follows: Stephen Senter, Office of Air Quality
other area where the EPA or an Indian Planning and Standards, Air Quality
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has Policy Division, Mail Code: C504–2, 109
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian Subpart TT—Utah TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle
country, the rule does not have tribal Park, NC 27709; by telephone (919)
implications and will not impose 541–3042; or by email at
■ 2. In § 52.2354, add paragraph (c) to
substantial direct costs on tribal senter.stephen@epa.gov.
read as follows:
governments or preempt tribal law as
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 § 52.2354 Interstate transport.
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). I. General Information
* * * * *
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small (c) Addition to the Utah State A. Notice and Comment Under the
Business Regulatory Enforcement Implementation Plan regarding the 2008 Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides ozone Standard for CAA section Section 553 of the APA, 5 U.S.C.
that before a rule may take effect, the 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) prong 1 submitted to 553(b)(3)(B), provides that, when an
agency promulgating the rule must EPA on January 31, 2013 and agency for good cause finds that notice
submit a rule report, which includes a supplemented on December 22, 2015. and public procedures are
copy of the rule, to each House of the [FR Doc. 2017–02187 Filed 2–2–17; 8:45 am] impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
Congress and to the Comptroller General to the public interest, the agency may
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
of the United States. EPA will submit a issue a rule without providing notice
report containing this action and other and an opportunity for public comment.
required information to the U.S. Senate, The EPA has determined that there is
the U.S. House of Representatives, and good cause for making this final agency
the Comptroller General of the United action without prior proposal and
States prior to publication of the rule in opportunity for comment because no
the Federal Register. A major rule significant EPA judgment is involved in
cannot take effect until 60 days after it making a finding of failure to submit
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:08 Feb 02, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03FER1.SGM 03FER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_9180/page/1.svg)
![9164 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 22 / Friday, February 3, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
is determining that this rule is of ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket triggered a requirement for states to
nationwide scope or effect. number EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0812 for submit an I–SIP to address the
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, this action. Generally, documents in the applicable requirements of section
petitions for judicial review of this docket for this action are available 110(a)(2) within three years of issuance
action must be filed in the United States electronically at http:// of the revised NAAQS. On April 10,
Court of Appeals for the District of www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 2013, NDEP submitted the ‘‘Nevada
Columbia Circuit within 60 days from EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, State Implementation Plan for the 2008
the date this final action is published in San Francisco, California 94105–3901. 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS: Demonstration
the Federal Register. Filing a petition While all documents in the docket are of Adequacy’’ (‘‘2013 Submittal’’) to
for review by the Administrator of this listed at http://www.regulations.gov, address all of the CAA section 110(a)(2)
final action does not affect the finality some information may be publicly requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone
of the action for the purposes of judicial available only at the hard copy location NAAQS. On March 25, 2016, NDEP
review, nor does it extend the time (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, submitted, ‘‘2016 Supplement to the
within which a petition for judicial multi-volume reports), and some may Nevada State Implementation Plan for
review must be filed, and shall not not be available in either location (e.g., the 2008 8-Hour Primary Ozone
postpone the effectiveness of such rule confidential business information NAAQS: Clean Air Act Section
or action. (CBI)). To inspect the hard copy 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)’’ (‘‘2016 Supplement’’).
materials, please schedule an
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 On November 3, 2015, the EPA issued
appointment during normal business
Environmental protection, Approval a partial approval and partial
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
and promulgation of implementation disapproval of Nevada’s 2013 I–SIP
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
plans, Administrative practice and submittal for the 2008 ozone, 2010
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
procedures, Air pollution control, nitrogen dioxide, and 2010 sulfur
Kelly, Air Planning Office (AIR–2), EPA, dioxide NAAQS, including the
Incorporation by reference, Region IX, (415) 972–3856,
Intergovernmental relations, and following actions on infrastructure SIP
kelly.thomasp@epa.gov. requirements: Approval of SIP elements
Reporting and recordkeeping SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
requirements. relating to CAA sections 110(a)(2)(A),
Throughout this document, the terms (B), (C), (D)(i)(II)—visibility transport
Dated: January 13, 2017. ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. (‘‘prong 4’’), (E), (F), (G), (H), (I), (K), (L)
Gina McCarthy, and (M); partial approval, for Clark
Table of Contents
Administrator. County, and partial disapproval, for
I. Background
[FR Doc. 2017–02188 Filed 2–2–17; 8:45 am]
II. Public Comments Washoe County and the remainder of
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P III. Final Action the state, of SIP elements relating to
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews CAA sections 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II)—
interference with Prevention of
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION I. Background Significant Deterioration (‘‘prong 3’’),
AGENCY Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the CAA (D)(ii) (interstate pollution abatement
require states to address basic SIP and international air pollution) and (J);
40 CFR Part 52 requirements to implement, maintain and, for NOX only, approval of SIP
[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0812; FRL–9958–82– and enforce the NAAQS no later than elements relating to prong 1 and prong
Region 9] three years after the promulgation of a 2 of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I).2 Our
new or revised standard. Section November 3, 2015, partial approval and
Approval of Air Quality State 110(a)(2) outlines the specific partial disapproval took no action on
Implementation Plans; Nevada; requirements that each state is required the Nevada 2013 Submittal with regard
Infrastructure Requirements To to address in this SIP submission that to prong 1 and prong 2 of the interstate
Address Interstate Transport for the collectively constitute the transport requirements for the 2008
2008 Ozone NAAQS ‘‘infrastructure’’ of a state’s air quality ozone NAAQS, but the proposal did
management program. A SIP submittal state our intention to take action in a
AGENCY: The Environmental Protection
that addresses these requirements is subsequent rulemaking. The EPA must
Agency (EPA).
referred to as an ‘‘infrastructure SIP’’ (I– take final action by February 13, 2017,
ACTION: Final rule. SIP). In particular, CAA section on the provisions of the Nevada 2013
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) requires that each SIP Submittal and 2016 Supplement
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
for a new or revised NAAQS contain addressing the requirements of prong 1
Agency (EPA) is approving State
adequate provisions to prohibit any and prong 2, pursuant to a judgment by
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
source or other type of emissions the District of Nevada in Nevada v.
submitted by the Nevada Division of
activity within the state from emitting McCarthy.3
Environmental Protection (NDEP) to
air pollutants that will ‘‘contribute
address the interstate transport On December 6, 2016, the EPA
significantly to nonattainment’’ (‘‘prong
requirements of Clean Air Act (CAA) proposed to approve the 2013 SIP
1’’) or ‘‘interfere with maintenance’’
with respect to the 2008 ozone national Submittal and the 2016 Supplement
(‘‘prong 2’’) of the applicable NAAQS in
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). addressing the infrastructure
any other state. This action addresses
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
We are approving the portion of the requirements of CAA section
the section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) requirements
Nevada SIP pertaining to requirements 110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the 2008 ozone
of prong 1 and prong 2 with respect to
prohibiting significant contributions
Nevada’s I–SIP submission.
from Nevada to nonattainment or On March 27, 2008, the EPA issued a
2 Partial Approval and Partial Disapproval of Air
interference with maintenance in revised NAAQS for ozone.1 This action
Quality State Implementation Plans; Nevada;
another state. Infrastructure Requirements for Ozone, NO2 and
SO2, 80 FR 67652 (November 3, 2015).
DATES: This final rule is effective on 1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for 3 See Judgment, Nevada v. McCarthy, Case 3:15–
March 6, 2017. Ozone; Final Rule, 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 2008). cv–00396–HDM–WGC (D. Nev. June 22, 2016).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:08 Feb 02, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03FER1.SGM 03FER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_9180/page/7.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-01 14:35:12
Document Modified: 2018-02-01 14:35:12
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | The effective date of this action is March 6, 2017. | |
| Contact | General questions concerning this | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 9158 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Administrative Practice and Procedures; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR