82 FR 9221 - Certain Automated Teller Machines, ATM Modules, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Commission Determination To Review in Part a Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Schedule for Filing Written Submissions on the Issues Under Review and on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding; and Granting a Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 22 (February 3, 2017)

Page Range		9221-9223
FR Document		2017-02276

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review in part the final initial determination (``final ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') on November 30, 2016, finding a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission has also determined to grant the motion filed on December 23, 2016, by the complainants to amend the complaint and notice of investigation. The Commission requests certain briefing from the parties on the issues under review, as indicated in this notice. The Commission also requests briefing from the parties and interested persons on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding.

Federal Register, Volume 82 Issue 22 (Friday, February 3, 2017)

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 22 (Friday, February 3, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9221-9223]
From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2017-02276]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-972]

Certain Automated Teller Machines, ATM Modules, Components
Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Commission Determination To
Review in Part a Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation of
Section 337; Schedule for Filing Written Submissions on the Issues
Under Review and on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding; and
Granting a Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to review in part the final initial
determination (``final ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law
judge (``ALJ'') on November 30, 2016, finding a violation of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, in the above-captioned investigation.
The Commission has also determined to grant the motion filed on
December 23, 2016, by the complainants to amend the complaint and
notice of investigation. The Commission requests certain briefing from
the parties on the issues under review, as indicated in this notice.
The Commission also requests briefing from the parties and interested
persons on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-708-2532. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on November 20, 2015, based on a complaint filed by Diebold
Incorporated and Diebold Self-Service Systems (collectively,
``Diebold''). 80 FR 72735-36 (Nov. 20, 2015). The complaint alleged
violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of
certain automated teller machines, ATM modules, components thereof, and
products containing the same by reason of infringement of certain
claims of six United States Patents: 7,121,461 (``the '461 patent'');
7,249,761 (``the '761 patent''); 7,314,163 (``the '163 patent'');
6,082,616 (``the '616 patent''); 7,229,010 (``the '010 patent''); and
7,832,631 (``the '631 patent''). Id. The notice of investigation named
as respondents Nautilus Hyosung Inc. of Seoul, Republic of Korea;
Nautilus Hyosung America Inc. of Irving, Texas; and HS Global, Inc. of
Brea, California (collectively, ``Nautilus''). Id. at 72736. The Office
of Unfair Import Investigations was not named as a party. Id.
The '461 patent, '761 patent, and '163 patent were previously
terminated from the investigation. See Order No. 12 (Apr. 28, 2016),
not reviewed, Notice (May 11, 2016); Order No. 21 (June 28, 2016), not
reviewed, Notice (July 28, 2016). The presiding administrative law
judge (``ALJ'') conducted an evidentiary hearing from August 29, 2016
through September 1, 2016. On November 30, 2016, the ALJ issued the
final Initial Determination (``final ID'' or ``ID''). The final ID
found a violation of section 337 with respect to the '616 and '631
patents, and no violation with respect to the '010 patent. ID at 207-
09. The ALJ recommended that a limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders issue against Nautilus.
Nautilus and Diebold each filed a petition for review of the ID. No
party petitioned for review concerning the '010 patent, the Commission
has determined not to review the ID's finding of no violation as to the
'010 patent, and the investigation is hereby terminated as to that
patent. What remain are asserted claims 1, 5-8, 10, 16, 26 and 27 of
the '616 patent; and asserted claims 1-7 and 18-20 of the '631 patent.
Diebold's petition deals principally with the '616 patent, and
Nautilus's petition deals principally with the '631 patent.
Separately, on December 23, 2016, Diebold moved the Commission for
leave to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to change the
name of Diebold, Incorporated (one of the two complainants) to Diebold
Nexdorf, Incorporated. Nautilus did not oppose the motion. The
Commission hereby grants the motion.
On December 30, 2016, the parties submitted statements on the
public interest. Diebold contends that the investigation does not raise
any public interest concerns. Nautilus asserts that a Commission
exclusion order should include a certification provision and that any
Commission remedial orders be tailored to allow repair of existing
Nautilus ATMs in the United States. In addition, the Commission
received submissions from United States Representative James B.
Renacci, United States Senator Sherrod Brown, and certain Nautilus
customers.
Having reviewed the record of investigation, including the ALJ's
orders and initial determinations, including the final ID, as well as
the parties' petitions for review and responses thereto, the Commission
has determined to review the ID in part.
For the '616 patent, the Commission has determined to review the
constructions of the terms ``service opening'' and ``a second position

[[Page 9222]]

wherein . . . the service opening is not accessible from outside the
housing.'' The Commission finds that the term ``service opening'' is to
receive its plain and ordinary meaning. The Commission finds that the
term means ``an opening through which a component may be serviced.''
The Commission finds that the term ``second position wherein . . . the
service opening is not accessible from outside the housing'' is to be
afforded its plain and ordinary meaning. The claim language ``the
service opening is not accessible from outside the housing'' in the
second position, read in view of the intrinsic record of the '616
patent, expressly states that ``the service opening is not
accessible''; it does not state that the ``service point'' is not
accessible from outside the housing in the second position. The
Commission's reasoning in support of its claim construction
determinations is set forth more fully in the Commission Claim
Construction Opinion.
In view of the Commission's determination to review and modify the
construction of these two claim limitations, the Commission has also
determined to review:
(1) Whether the accused products infringe each of the asserted
claims of the '616 patent literally or under the doctrine of
equivalents;
(2) whether the asserted claims of the '616 patent are obvious in
view of Diebold's 1064i ATM; and
(3) whether Diebold has satisfied the technical prong for the
domestic industry requirement for the '616 patent.
The Commission has determined to review and to take no position on
whether, for the '631 patent, Diebold satisfied the economic prong of
the domestic industry requirement under 19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(3)(B) based
on its field service labor expenditures.
The Commission has determined not to review the remainder of the
ID.
The parties are asked to brief the issues for the '616 patent of
infringement, obviousness in view of Diebold's 1064i ATM, and the
technical prong, in view of the Commission's constructions, and with
reference to the applicable law and the existing evidentiary record.
For each argument presented, the parties' submissions should
demonstrate that the argument has been preserved in accordance with the
ALJ's Ground Rules as well as Commission Rule 210.43(b), 19 CFR
210.43(b).
In connection with the final disposition of this investigation, the
Commission may (1) issue an order that could result in the exclusion of
the subject articles from entry into the United States, and/or (2)
issue one or more cease and desist orders that could result in the
respondent(s) being required to cease and desist from engaging in
unfair acts in the importation and sale of such articles. Accordingly,
the Commission is interested in receiving written submissions that
address the form of remedy, if any, that should be ordered. If a party
seeks exclusion of an article from entry into the United States for
purposes other than entry for consumption, the party should so indicate
and provide information establishing that activities involving other
types of entry either are adversely affecting it or likely to do so.
For background, see Certain Devices for Connecting Computers via
Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337-TA-360, USITC Pub. No. 2843, Comm'n Op.
(December 1994).
If the Commission contemplates some form of remedy, it must
consider the effects of that remedy upon the public interest. The
factors the Commission will consider include the effect that an
exclusion order and/or cease and desist orders would have on (1) the
public health and welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S.
economy, (3) U.S. production of articles that are like or directly
competitive with those that are subject to investigation, and (4) U.S.
consumers. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving written
submissions that address the aforementioned public interest factors in
the context of this investigation.
If the Commission orders some form of remedy, the U.S. Trade
Representative, as delegated by the President, has 60 days to approve
or disapprove the Commission's action. See Presidential Memorandum of
July 21, 2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005). During this period, the
subject articles would be entitled to enter the United States under
bond, in an amount determined by the Commission. The Commission is
therefore interested in receiving submissions concerning the amount of
the bond that should be imposed if a remedy is ordered.
Written Submissions: The parties to the investigation are requested
to file written submissions on the issues under review as set forth
above. Parties to the investigation, interested government agencies,
and any other interested parties are encouraged to file written
submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding.
Such submissions should address the recommended determination by the
ALJ on remedy and bonding. The complainants are requested to submit
proposed remedial orders for the Commission's consideration. The
complainants are also requested to state the date that the '631 and
'616 patents expire, the HTSUS numbers under which the accused products
are imported, and the names of known importers of the products at issue
in this investigation. The written submissions and proposed remedial
orders must be filed no later than close of business on February 10,
2017, and should not exceed 40 pages. Reply submissions must be filed
no later than the close of business on February 17, 2017, and such
replies should not exceed 30 pages. No further submissions on these
issues will be permitted unless otherwise ordered by the Commission.
Persons filing written submissions must file the original document
electronically on or before the deadlines stated above and submit 8
true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary by noon the next day
pursuant to section 210.4(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to the
investigation number (``Inv. No. 337-TA-972'') in a prominent place on
the cover page and/or the first page. (See Handbook for Electronic
Filing Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf). Persons with questions regarding
filing should contact the Secretary (202-205-2000).
Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests
should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include
a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment
by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. All
information, including confidential business information and documents
for which confidential treatment is properly sought, submitted to the
Commission for purposes of this Investigation may be disclosed to and
used: (i) By the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract
personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a
related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews,
and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of
the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S.
government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity
purposes. All nonconfidential written submissions will be available for
public inspection at the Office of the Secretary and on EDIS.

[[Page 9223]]

The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).

By order of the Commission.

Issued: January 30, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2017-02276 Filed 2-2-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 22 / Friday, February 3, 2017 / Notices 9221

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda complaint and notice of investigation. (Apr. 28, 2016), not reviewed, Notice
topics will include an introduction of The Commission requests certain (May 11, 2016); Order No. 21 (June 28,
new BLM managers, an update on the briefing from the parties on the issues 2016), not reviewed, Notice (July 28,
Planning 2.0 Rule, implementation of under review, as indicated in this 2016). The presiding administrative law
Greater Sage-Grouse plans, and updates notice. The Commission also requests judge (‘‘ALJ’’) conducted an evidentiary
on current resource management briefing from the parties and interested hearing from August 29, 2016 through
planning efforts and major projects. persons on the issues of remedy, the September 1, 2016. On November 30,
A public comment period will take public interest, and bonding. 2016, the ALJ issued the final Initial
place on Feb. 23 from 3 p.m. to 4 p.m., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Determination (‘‘final ID’’ or ‘‘ID’’). The
where the public may address the RAC. Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the final ID found a violation of section 337
Written comments may also be sent to General Counsel, U.S. International with respect to the ’616 and ’631
the BLM Utah State Office at the address Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., patents, and no violation with respect to
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– the ’010 patent. ID at 207–09. The ALJ
notice. 708–2532. Copies of non-confidential recommended that a limited exclusion
The meeting is open to the public; documents filed in connection with this order and cease and desist orders issue
however, transportation, lodging, and investigation are or will be available for against Nautilus.
meals are the responsibility of the inspection during official business
participating individuals. Nautilus and Diebold each filed a
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the petition for review of the ID. No party
Persons who use a Office of the Secretary, U.S.
telecommunications device for the deaf petitioned for review concerning the
International Trade Commission, 500 E ’010 patent, the Commission has
(TDD) may call the Federal Relay Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to determined not to review the ID’s
telephone 202–205–2000. General finding of no violation as to the ’010
leave a message or question for the information concerning the Commission
above individual. The FRS is available patent, and the investigation is hereby
may also be obtained by accessing its terminated as to that patent. What
24 hours a day, seven days a week. Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
Replies are provided during normal remain are asserted claims 1, 5–8, 10,
The public record for this investigation 16, 26 and 27 of the ’616 patent; and
business hours. may be viewed on the Commission’s
Authority: 43 CFR 1784.4–1.
asserted claims 1–7 and 18–20 of the
electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// ’631 patent. Diebold’s petition deals
Richard T. Cardinale, edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
principally with the ’616 patent, and
persons are advised that information on
Acting Assistant Secretary, Land and Nautilus’s petition deals principally
Minerals Management. this matter can be obtained by
with the ’631 patent.
[FR Doc. 2017–02301 Filed 2–2–17; 8:45 am]
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810. Separately, on December 23, 2016,
BILLING CODE 4310–DQ–P Diebold moved the Commission for
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation leave to amend the complaint and
on November 20, 2015, based on a notice of investigation to change the
INTERNATIONAL TRADE name of Diebold, Incorporated (one of
complaint filed by Diebold Incorporated
COMMISSION the two complainants) to Diebold
and Diebold Self-Service Systems
[Investigation No. 337–TA–972] (collectively, ‘‘Diebold’’). 80 FR 72735– Nexdorf, Incorporated. Nautilus did not
36 (Nov. 20, 2015). The complaint oppose the motion. The Commission
Certain Automated Teller Machines, alleged violations of section 337 of the hereby grants the motion.
ATM Modules, Components Thereof, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 On December 30, 2016, the parties
and Products Containing the Same; U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the submitted statements on the public
Commission Determination To Review United States, the sale for importation, interest. Diebold contends that the
in Part a Final Initial Determination and the sale within the United States investigation does not raise any public
Finding a Violation of Section 337; after importation of certain automated interest concerns. Nautilus asserts that a
Schedule for Filing Written teller machines, ATM modules, Commission exclusion order should
Submissions on the Issues Under components thereof, and products include a certification provision and
Review and on Remedy, the Public containing the same by reason of that any Commission remedial orders be
Interest, and Bonding; and Granting a infringement of certain claims of six tailored to allow repair of existing
Motion To Amend the Complaint and United States Patents: 7,121,461 (‘‘the Nautilus ATMs in the United States. In
Notice of Investigation ’461 patent’’); 7,249,761 (‘‘the ’761 addition, the Commission received
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade patent’’); 7,314,163 (‘‘the ’163 patent’’); submissions from United States
Commission. 6,082,616 (‘‘the ’616 patent’’); 7,229,010 Representative James B. Renacci, United
ACTION: Notice. (‘‘the ’010 patent’’); and 7,832,631 (‘‘the States Senator Sherrod Brown, and
’631 patent’’). Id. The notice of certain Nautilus customers.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that investigation named as respondents
the U.S. International Trade Having reviewed the record of
Nautilus Hyosung Inc. of Seoul,
Commission has determined to review investigation, including the ALJ’s orders
Republic of Korea; Nautilus Hyosung
in part the final initial determination and initial determinations, including
America Inc. of Irving, Texas; and HS
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

(‘‘final ID’’) issued by the presiding the final ID, as well as the parties’
Global, Inc. of Brea, California
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on (collectively, ‘‘Nautilus’’). Id. at 72736. petitions for review and responses
November 30, 2016, finding a violation The Office of Unfair Import thereto, the Commission has determined
of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, Investigations was not named as a party. to review the ID in part.
in the above-captioned investigation. Id. For the ’616 patent, the Commission
The Commission has also determined to The ’461 patent, ’761 patent, and ’163 has determined to review the
grant the motion filed on December 23, patent were previously terminated from constructions of the terms ‘‘service
2016, by the complainants to amend the the investigation. See Order No. 12 opening’’ and ‘‘a second position

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:26 Feb 02, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM 03FEN1

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 22 / Friday, February 3, 2017 / Notices 9223

The authority for the Commission’s and all persons who requested the Issued: January 31, 2017.
determination is contained in section opportunity were permitted to appear in Katherine M. Hiner,
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as person or by counsel. Acting Supervisory Attorney.
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part The Commission made this [FR Doc. 2017–02340 Filed 2–2–17; 8:45 am]
210 of the Commission’s Rules of determination pursuant to section BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 735(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)).
210).
It completed and filed its determination
By order of the Commission. in this investigation on January 30,
Issued: January 30, 2017. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
2017. The views of the Commission are
Lisa R. Barton, contained in USITC Publication 4666 Drug Enforcement Administration
Secretary to the Commission. (January 2017), entitled Large
[FR Doc. 2017–02276 Filed 2–2–17; 8:45 am] Residential Washers from China: Richard W. Walker, Jr., M.D.; Decision
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P Investigation No. 731–TA–1306 (Final). and Order
By order of the Commission. On October 3, 2016, the Assistant
Issued: January 30, 2017. Administrator, Diversion Control
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
Lisa R. Barton, Division, Drug Enforcement
COMMISSION
Secretary to the Commission. Administration (DEA), issued an Order
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1306 (Final)] to Show Cause to Richard W. Walker,
[FR Doc. 2017–02245 Filed 2–2–17; 8:45 am]
M.D. (Registrant), of League City, Texas.
Large Residential Washers From China BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
The Show Cause Order proposed the
Determination revocation of his DEA Certificate of
Registration No. AW2558750, on the
On the basis of the record 1 developed INTERNATIONAL TRADE ground that he does not have authority
in the subject investigation, the United COMMISSION to dispense controlled substances in
States International Trade Commission Texas, the State in which he is
(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant [Investigation No. 731–TA–718 (Fourth registered with the Agency. Order to
to section 735(b) of the Tariff Act of Review)] Show Cause, at 1 (citing 21 U.S.C. 823(f)
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (‘‘the Act’’), and 824(a)(3)).
that an industry in the United States is Glycine From China; Determination With respect to the Agency’s
materially injured by reason of imports jurisdiction, the Show Cause Order
of large residential washers from China, On the basis of the record 1 developed alleged that Registrant is the holder of
provided for in subheading 8450.20.00 in the subject five-year review, the Registration No. AW2558750, pursuant
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of United States International Trade to which he is authorized to dispense
the United States, that have been found Commission (‘‘Commission’’) controlled substances in schedules II
by the Department of Commerce determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of through V as a practitioner, at the
(‘‘Commerce’’) to be sold in the United 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the registered address of 4604 Hispania
States at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’). antidumping duty order on glycine from View Drive, League City, Texas. Id. The
Background China would be likely to lead to Order also alleges that Registrant’s
continuation or recurrence of material registration does not expire until May
The Commission instituted this injury to an industry in the United 31, 2017. Id.
investigation effective December 16,
States within a reasonably foreseeable As ground for the proposed action,
2015, following receipt of a petition
time. the Show Cause Order alleged that
filed with the Commission and
‘‘[t]he Texas Medical Board issued an
Commerce by Whirlpool Corporation, Background
order, effective June 10, 2016, which
Benton Harbor, Michigan. The
The Commission, pursuant to section accepted [the] surrender of [his]
Commission scheduled the final phase
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), authority to practice medicine.’’ Id. The
of the investigation following
instituted this review on August 1, 2016 Order thus asserted that as a
notification of a preliminary
(81 FR 50547) and determined on consequence of the Board’s action,
determination by Commerce that
November 4, 2016 that it would conduct Registrant is without authority to
imports of large residential washers
an expedited review (81 FR 87589, dispense controlled substances in
from China were being sold at LTFV
December 5, 2016). Texas, the State in which he is
within the meaning of section 733(b) of
registered, and thus, ‘‘DEA must
the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of The Commission made this revoke’’ his Registration. Id. at 1 (citing
the scheduling of the final phase of the determination pursuant to section 21 U.S.C. 802(21), 823(f)(1) and
Commission’s investigation and of a 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It 824(a)(3)).
public hearing to be held in connection completed and filed its determination in The Show Cause Order notified
therewith was given by posting copies this review on January 31, 2017. The Registrant of his right to request a
of the notice in the Office of the views of the Commission are contained hearing on the allegations or to submit
Secretary, U.S. International Trade in USITC Publication 4667 (January a written statement in lieu of a hearing,
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Commission, Washington, DC, and by 2017), entitled Glycine From China: the procedure for electing either option,
publishing the notice in the Federal Investigation No. 731–TA–718 (Fourth and the consequence of failing to elect
Register of August 18, 2016 (81 FR
Review). either option. Id. at 2 (citing 21 CFR
55231). The hearing was held in
By order of the Commission. 1301.43).
Washington, DC, on December 7, 2016,
The Show Cause Order also notified
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Registrant of his right to submit a
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 corrective action plan. Id. at 2–3 (citing
CFR 207.2(f)). CFR 207.2(f)). 21 U.S.C. 824(c)(2)(C)).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:26 Feb 02, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM 03FEN1

Document Created: 2018-02-01 14:34:40
Document Modified: 2018-02-01 14:34:40

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Notice.
Contact		Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-708-2532. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205- 1810.
FR Citation		82 FR 9221