82 FR 9722 - Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and Preliminary Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 25 (February 8, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 25 (February 8, 2017)
| Page Range | 9722-9723 | |
| FR Document | 2017-02528 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 8, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 9722-9723] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-02528] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-937] Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and Preliminary Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') is conducting the seventh administrative review (``AR'') of the antidumping duty order on citric acid and certain citrate salts (``citric acid'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''). The Department selected two companies, RZBC Co., Ltd., RZBC Import & Export Co., Ltd., and RZBC (Juxian) Co., Ltd. (collectively, ``RZBC'') and Laiwu Taihe Biochemistry Co., Ltd. (``Taihe''), as mandatory respondents for individual examination. The period of review (``POR'') for the AR is May 1, 2015 through April 30, 2016. The Department is rescinding the review with respect to RZBC. Further, the Department preliminarily finds that Taihe is part of the PRC-wide entity. DATES: Effective February 8, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Krisha Hill or Maliha Khan, Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4037 or (202) 482-0895, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The products covered by the order include the hydrous and anhydrous forms of citric acid, the dihydrate and anhydrous forms of sodium citrate, otherwise known as citric acid sodium salt, and the monohydrate and monopotassium forms of potassium citrate. Sodium citrate also includes both trisodium citrate and monosodium citrate, which are also known as citric acid trisodium salt and citric acid monosodium salt, respectively. Citric acid and sodium citrate are classifiable under 2918.14.0000 and 2918.15.1000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''), respectively. Potassium citrate and crude calcium citrate are classifiable under 2918.15.5000 and 3824.90.9290 of the HTSUS, respectively. Blends that include citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate are classifiable under 3824.90.9290 of the HTSUS. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise is dispositive.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Canada and the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 25703 (May 29, 2009) for a full description of the scope of the order. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rescission of Administrative Review in Part On May 31, 2016, Archer Daniels Midland Company, Cargill, Incorporated, and Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas LLC (collectively ``Petitioners'') requested an AR of subject merchandise exported by RZBC, Taihe, and an additional 16 companies. Subsequently, on October 5, 2016, Petitioners timely withdrew their request for an AR of RZBC.\2\ No other party requested a review with respect to RZBC. Therefore, the Department, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), is rescinding this AR with respect to RZBC. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Letter from Petitioners to the Department, ``Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from the People's Republic of China / Partial Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,'' dated October 5, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Determination of No Shipments Two companies for which a review was requested, Niran (Thailand) Co., Ltd. (``Niran'') and Niran Biochemical Limited (``Niran Biochemical''), timely submitted certifications indicating that they had no exports, sales, shipments, or entries of subject merchandise during the POR. Consistent with our practice, the Department requested that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') conduct a query on potential shipments made by Niran and Niran Biochemical during the POR; CBP provided no evidence that contradicted the companies' claims of no shipments. Based on the no shipment certifications submitted by Niran and Niran Biochemical, and our analysis of the CBP information, we preliminarily determine that Niran and Niran Biochemical had no shipments during the POR. However, consistent with our practice in non- market economy (``NME'') cases, the Department intends to complete the review with respect to Niran and Niran Biochemical and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of the review. Methodology The Department is conducting this AR in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\3\ This memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov/login.aspx and in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary [[Page 9723]] Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and Preliminary Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from the People's Republic of China; 2015-2016,'' issued concurrently with this notice (``Preliminary Decision Memorandum''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of Review The Department's change in policy regarding conditional review of the PRC-wide entity applies to this AR.\4\ Aside from RZBC, for which the AR is being rescinded, the Department considers all other companies for which a review was requested to be part of the PRC-wide entity. Because Taihe did not respond to the Department's original questionnaire and did not provide separate rate information, Taihe has not established its eligibility for separate rate status and, therefore, is part of the PRC-wide entity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). Under this policy, the PRC-wide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or the Department self- initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party requested a review of the PRC-wide entity in this review, the entity's rate (i.e., 156.87 percent) is not subject to change. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition to Taihe, 14 companies listed in the Initiation Notice and, thus, subject to this AR, failed to provide separate rate applications or separate rate certifications necessary to establish their eligibility for a separate rate. Therefore, the Department preliminarily determines that these 14 companies are not eligible for a separate rate and are part of the PRC-wide entity. The rate previously established for the PRC-wide entity in this proceeding is 156.87 percent.\5\ For additional information, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 80 FR 77323, 77324 (December 14, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclosure and Public Comment Interested parties may submit case briefs and/or written comments, filed electronically using ACCESS, within 30 days of the date of publication of these preliminary results of review.\6\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, will be due five days after the due date for case briefs.\7\ Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with each argument a statement of the issue, a summary of the argument not to exceed five pages, and a table of authorities.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c). \7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). \8\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Further, interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days after the publication of this notice.\9\ Electronically filed case briefs/written comments and hearing requests must be received successfully in their entirety by the Department's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\10\ Hearing requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those issues raised in the respective case briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date of the hearing which will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \10\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department intends to issue the final results of this AR, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, unless extended, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\11\ The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. The Department intends to instruct CBP to liquidate entries of subject merchandise from the PRC-wide entity, including entries of subject merchandise from Taihe, at 156.87 percent (the PRC-wide rate).\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \12\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this AR for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters which are not under review in this segment of the proceeding but which have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter- specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (2) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-wide entity, 156.87 percent; and (3) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4). Dated: January 31, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Partial Rescission IV. Scope of the Order V. Discussion of the Methodology VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-02528 Filed 2-7-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![9722 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 8, 2017 / Notices
(xviii) 0.015 percent of zirconium. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Preliminary Determination of No
Finished carbon steel flanges are currently Krisha Hill or Maliha Khan, Office IV, Shipments
classified under subheadings 7307.91.5010
Enforcement & Compliance,
and 7307.91.5050 of the Harmonized Tariff Two companies for which a review
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). They International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, 1401 was requested, Niran (Thailand) Co.,
may also be entered under HTSUS
Ltd. (‘‘Niran’’) and Niran Biochemical
subheadings 7307.91.5030 and 7307.91.5070. Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
The HTSUS subheadings are provided for Limited (‘‘Niran Biochemical’’), timely
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4037 or
convenience and customs purposes; the submitted certifications indicating that
(202) 482–0895, respectively.
written description of the scope is they had no exports, sales, shipments,
dispositive. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: or entries of subject merchandise during
the POR. Consistent with our practice,
Appendix II Scope of the Order the Department requested that U.S.
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
The products covered by the order
Decision Memorandum conduct a query on potential shipments
include the hydrous and anhydrous
1. Summary
forms of citric acid, the dihydrate and made by Niran and Niran Biochemical
2. Background during the POR; CBP provided no
3. Period of Investigation anhydrous forms of sodium citrate,
otherwise known as citric acid sodium evidence that contradicted the
4. Scope of the Investigation
salt, and the monohydrate and companies’ claims of no shipments.
5. Postponement of Final Determination and
Extension of Provisional Measures Based on the no shipment certifications
monopotassium forms of potassium
6. Scope Comments submitted by Niran and Niran
citrate. Sodium citrate also includes
7. Affiliation and Collapsing of Affiliates Biochemical, and our analysis of the
both trisodium citrate and monosodium
8. Discussion of the Methodology CBP information, we preliminarily
9. Product Comparisons citrate, which are also known as citric
determine that Niran and Niran
10. Date of Sale acid trisodium salt and citric acid Biochemical had no shipments during
11. Export Price monosodium salt, respectively. Citric the POR. However, consistent with our
12. Normal Value acid and sodium citrate are classifiable
13. Currency Conversion
practice in non-market economy
under 2918.14.0000 and 2918.15.1000 of (‘‘NME’’) cases, the Department intends
14. Conclusion
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the to complete the review with respect to
[FR Doc. 2017–02607 Filed 2–7–17; 8:45 am] United States (‘‘HTSUS’’), respectively. Niran and Niran Biochemical and issue
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Potassium citrate and crude calcium appropriate instructions to CBP based
citrate are classifiable under on the final results of the review.
2918.15.5000 and 3824.90.9290 of the
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Methodology
HTSUS, respectively. Blends that
International Trade Administration include citric acid, sodium citrate, and The Department is conducting this AR
potassium citrate are classifiable under in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B)
[A–570–937] 3824.90.9290 of the HTSUS. Although of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts the HTSUS subheadings are provided (‘‘the Act’’). For a full description of the
From the People’s Republic of China: for convenience and customs purposes, methodology underlying our
Preliminary Results of Antidumping the written description of the conclusions, see the Preliminary
Duty Administrative Review, merchandise is dispositive.1 Decision Memorandum.3 This
Preliminary Determination of No Rescission of Administrative Review in memorandum is a public document and
Shipments, and Preliminary Partial Part is on file electronically via Enforcement
Rescission of Antidumping Duty and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Administrative Review; 2015–2016 On May 31, 2016, Archer Daniels Countervailing Duty Centralized
Midland Company, Cargill, Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Incorporated, and Tate & Lyle ACCESS is available to registered users
International Trade Administration,
Ingredients Americas LLC (collectively at https://access.trade.gov/login.aspx
Department of Commerce.
‘‘Petitioners’’) requested an AR of and in the Central Records Unit, Room
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce B8024 of the main Department of
(‘‘the Department’’) is conducting the subject merchandise exported by RZBC,
Taihe, and an additional 16 companies. Commerce building. In addition, a
seventh administrative review (‘‘AR’’) of complete version of the Preliminary
the antidumping duty order on citric Subsequently, on October 5, 2016,
Petitioners timely withdrew their Decision Memorandum can be accessed
acid and certain citrate salts (‘‘citric directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/
acid’’) from the People’s Republic of request for an AR of RZBC.2 No other
party requested a review with respect to frn/index.html/. The signed Preliminary
China (‘‘PRC’’). The Department Decision Memorandum and the
selected two companies, RZBC Co., Ltd., RZBC. Therefore, the Department,
electronic version of the Preliminary
RZBC Import & Export Co., Ltd., and pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), is
RZBC (Juxian) Co., Ltd. (collectively, rescinding this AR with respect to 3 See Memorandum from Gary Taverman,
‘‘RZBC’’) and Laiwu Taihe Biochemistry RZBC. Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary, Antidumping
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Taihe’’), as mandatory
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K.
respondents for individual examination. 1 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
The period of review (‘‘POR’’) for the Canada and the People’s Republic of China: Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Decision
Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 25703 (May 29, Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of
AR is May 1, 2015 through April 30, Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,
2016. The Department is rescinding the 2009) for a full description of the scope of the order.
2 See Letter from Petitioners to the Department,
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and
review with respect to RZBC. Further, Preliminary Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
‘‘Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from the Administrative Review: Citric Acid and Certain
the Department preliminarily finds that People’s Republic of China / Partial Withdrawal of Citrate Salts from the People’s Republic of China;
Taihe is part of the PRC-wide entity. Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated October 2015–2016,’’ issued concurrently with this notice
DATES: Effective February 8, 2017. 5, 2016. (‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:36 Feb 07, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM 08FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_9747/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 8, 2017 / Notices 9723
Decision Memorandum are identical in Secretary for Enforcement and to be the exporter-specific rate
content. Compliance, U.S. Department of published for the most recently
Commerce, within 30 days after the completed segment of this proceeding;
Preliminary Results of Review
publication of this notice.9 (2) for all PRC exporters of subject
The Department’s change in policy Electronically filed case briefs/written merchandise that have not been found
regarding conditional review of the comments and hearing requests must be to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash
PRC-wide entity applies to this AR.4 received successfully in their entirety by deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-
Aside from RZBC, for which the AR is the Department’s electronic records wide entity, 156.87 percent; and (3) for
being rescinded, the Department system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern all non-PRC exporters of subject
considers all other companies for which Time, within 30 days after the date of merchandise which have not received
a review was requested to be part of the publication of this notice.10 Hearing their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
PRC-wide entity. Because Taihe did not requests should contain: (1) The party’s be the rate applicable to the PRC
respond to the Department’s original name, address and telephone number; exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC
questionnaire and did not provide (2) the number of participants; and (3) exporter. These deposit requirements,
separate rate information, Taihe has not a list of issues to be discussed. Issues when imposed, shall remain in effect
established its eligibility for separate raised in the hearing will be limited to until further notice.
rate status and, therefore, is part of the those issues raised in the respective case
PRC-wide entity. briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, Notification to Importers
In addition to Taihe, 14 companies parties will be notified of the time and This notice also serves as a
listed in the Initiation Notice and, thus, date of the hearing which will be held preliminary reminder to importers of
subject to this AR, failed to provide at the U.S. Department of Commerce, their responsibility under 19 CFR
separate rate applications or separate 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
rate certifications necessary to establish Washington, DC 20230. regarding the reimbursement of
their eligibility for a separate rate. The Department intends to issue the antidumping duties prior to liquidation
Therefore, the Department preliminarily final results of this AR, including the of the relevant entries during this
determines that these 14 companies are results of its analysis of the issues raised review period. Failure to comply with
not eligible for a separate rate and are in any written briefs, not later than 120 this requirement could result in the
part of the PRC-wide entity. days after the date of publication of this Department’s presumption that
The rate previously established for the notice, unless extended, pursuant to reimbursement of antidumping duties
PRC-wide entity in this proceeding is section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. occurred and the subsequent assessment
156.87 percent.5 For additional Assessment Rates of double antidumping duties.
information, see the Preliminary We are issuing and publishing these
Decision Memorandum. Upon issuance of the final results, the results in accordance with sections
Department will determine, and CBP 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
Disclosure and Public Comment shall assess, antidumping duties on all CFR 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4).
Interested parties may submit case appropriate entries covered by this
review.11 The Department intends to Dated: January 31, 2017.
briefs and/or written comments, filed
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 Ronald K. Lorentzen,
electronically using ACCESS, within 30
days of the date of publication of these days after the publication date of the Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
final results of this review. The and Compliance.
preliminary results of review.6 Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in the Department intends to instruct CBP to Appendix
case briefs, will be due five days after liquidate entries of subject merchandise
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
the due date for case briefs.7 Parties who from the PRC-wide entity, including
Decision Memorandum
submit case or rebuttal briefs in this entries of subject merchandise from
Taihe, at 156.87 percent (the PRC-wide I. Summary
proceeding are requested to submit with II. Background
each argument a statement of the issue, rate).12 III. Partial Rescission
a summary of the argument not to Cash Deposit Requirements IV. Scope of the Order
exceed five pages, and a table of V. Discussion of the Methodology
authorities.8 The following cash deposit VI. Recommendation
Further, interested parties who wish requirements will be effective upon
[FR Doc. 2017–02528 Filed 2–7–17; 8:45 am]
to request a hearing must submit a publication of the final results of this
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
written request to the Assistant AR for all shipments of the subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
4 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement from warehouse, for consumption on or DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
of Change in Department Practice for Respondent after the publication date of the final
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and results of review, as provided by section International Trade Administration
Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
previously investigated or reviewed PRC [A–469–815]
FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). Under this policy,
the PRC-wide entity will not be under review and non-PRC exporters which are not Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From
unless a party specifically requests, or the under review in this segment of the
Department self-initiates, a review of the entity. Spain: Preliminary Determination of
proceeding but which have separate
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Because no party requested a review of the PRC- Sales at Less Than Fair Value
wide entity in this review, the entity’s rate (i.e., rates, the cash deposit rate will continue
156.87 percent) is not subject to change. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
5 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from 9 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). International Trade Administration,
the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 10 Id.
Department of Commerce.
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013– 11 See19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
2014, 80 FR 77323, 77324 (December 14, 2015). SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
12 Fora full discussion of this practice, see Non-
6 See 19 CFR 351.309(c).
Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
(the Department) preliminarily
7 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 determines that finished carbon steel
8 See 19 CFR 351.309(c). (October 24, 2011). flanges from Spain are being, or are
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:36 Feb 07, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM 08FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_9747/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2017-02-08 02:59:00
Document Modified: 2017-02-08 02:59:00
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective February 8, 2017. | |
| Contact | Krisha Hill or Maliha Khan, Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4037 or (202) 482-0895, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 9722 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR