82 FR 9723 - Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From Spain: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 25 (February 8, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 25 (February 8, 2017)
| Page Range | 9723-9726 | |
| FR Document | 2017-02606 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 8, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 9723-9726] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-02606] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-469-815] Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From Spain: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) preliminarily determines that finished carbon steel flanges from Spain are being, or are [[Page 9724]] likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2015, through March 31, 2016. The estimated weighted-average dumping margins of sales at LTFV are shown in the ``Preliminary Determination'' section of this notice. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. DATES: Effective February 8, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Flessner or Erin Kearney, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6312 or (202) 482-0167, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Department initiated this investigation on July 20, 2016.\1\ We selected one mandatory respondent in this investigation, ULMA Forja, S.Coop (ULMA), which accounted for all imports of finished carbon steel flanges from Spain during the POI.\2\ For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this investigation, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum that is dated concurrently with this determination and hereby adopted by this notice.\3\ A list of topics in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix II to this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India, Italy, and Spain: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 81 FR 49619 (July 28, 2016) (Initiation Notice). \2\ See Memorandum from Mark Flessner to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled, ``Respondent Selection for the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from Spain,'' dated November 18, 2016 (Respondent Selection Memorandum). \3\ See Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, entitled ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Determination in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from Spain,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the public via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Department's Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Scope of the Investigation The product covered by this investigation is finished carbon steel flanges from Spain. For a full description of the scope of this investigation, see the ``Scope of the Investigation,'' in Appendix I of this notice. Scope Comments We received no comments from interested parties regarding the scope of the investigation as it appeared in the Initiation Notice. The scope published in the Initiation Notice contained typographical errors, which have been corrected in Appendix I. Methodology The Department is conducting this investigation in accordance with section 731 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Pursuant to section 776(a) of the Act, the Department preliminarily relied upon facts otherwise available to assign an estimated weighted-average dumping margin to the mandatory respondent in this investigation, because ULMA did not submit a response to the Department's questionnaire.\4\ Further, the Department preliminarily determines that ULMA failed to cooperate by not acting to the best of its ability to comply with a request for information, and has applied an adverse inference in selecting from the facts otherwise available (AFA) for ULMA, in accordance with section 776(b) of Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our preliminary determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Letter from ULMA to the Secretary of Commerce entitled, ``ULMA Piping's Notice of Intent Not To Respond To The Department's Questionnaire--Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from Spain,'' dated September 30, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- All-Others Rate Section 733(d)(1)(A)(ii) of the Act provides that in the preliminary determination the Department shall determine an estimated ``all-others'' rate for all exporters and producers not individually investigated, in accordance with section 735(c)(5) of the Act. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act states that generally the estimated rate for all-others shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero and de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely under section 776 of the Act. The estimated weighted-average dumping margin determined for the individually examined respondent in this preliminary determination was determined entirely under section 776 of the Act. In an investigation where no weighted-average dumping margins other than zero, de minimis, or those determined entirely under section 776 of the Act have been established for individually examined entities, in accordance with section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, the Department has previously used the simple average of the margins calculated in the petition and applied the result to ``all-other'' entities not individually examined.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Steel Threaded Rod from Thailand: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Critical Circumstances, 78 FR 79670, 79671 (December 31, 2013), unchanged in Steel Threaded Rod from Thailand: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Final Determination of Critical Circumstances, 79 FR 14476, 14477 (March 14, 2014); see also Notice of Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Sodium Nitrite from the Federal Republic of Germany, 73 FR 21909 (April 23, 2008); unchanged in Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Sodium Nitrite from the Federal Republic of Germany, 73 FR 38986 (July 8, 2008). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- With respect to Spain, the petitioners calculated two margins in the Petition.\6\ Thus, consistent with our practice, we preliminarily assigned as the ``all-others'' rate in this investigation the simple average of the two dumping margins calculated for subject merchandise from Spain provided in the Petitions, as recalculated by the Department for initiation purposes, which is 18.81 percent.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Letter from Weldbend Corporation and Boltex Mfg. Co., L.P. (collectively, petitioners) to the Secretary of the U.S. International Trade Commission and the Secretary of Commerce entitled, ``Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from Spain: 2nd Supplemental Questionnaire Response,'' dated July 13, 2016, at 2 and Exhibit 1. See also AD Investigation Initiation Checklist: Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from Spain (July 20, 2016) (in which the petition margins were recalculated for purposes of initiation). \7\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Determination The Department preliminarily determines that finished carbon steel flanges from Spain are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at LTFV, pursuant to section 733 of the Act, and that the following estimated [[Page 9725]] weighted-average dumping margins exist: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter/manufacturer dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ULMA Forja, S.Coop.......................................... 24.43 All Others.................................................. 18.81 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Suspension of Liquidation In accordance with section 733(d)(2) of the Act, we will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of all entries of finished carbon steel flanges from Spain, as described in the Scope of the Investigation in Appendix I, that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Pursuant to section 733(d) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(d), we will instruct CBP to require cash deposits \8\ equal to the weighted- average amount by which the normal value exceeds U.S. price, as indicated in the chart above, as follows: (1) The rate for the mandatory respondent listed above will be the respondent-specific rate we determined in this preliminary determination; (2) if the exporter is not a mandatory respondent identified above, but the producer is, the rate will be the specific rate established for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (3) the rate for all other producers or exporters will be the all-others rate. The suspension of liquidation instructions will remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Modification of Regulations Regarding the Practice of Accepting Bonds During the Provisional Measures Period in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations, 76 FR 61042 (October 3, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclosure Normally, the Department discloses to interested parties the calculations performed in connection with a preliminary determination within five days after public announcement of the preliminary determination in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Because the Department preliminarily applied a rate from the Petition as AFA to the mandatory respondent in this investigation, there are no calculations to disclose. Verification Because the mandatory respondent in this investigation did not provide the information requested, the Department will not conduct verifications. Public Comment Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this preliminary determination.\9\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in case briefs, may be submitted no later than five days after the deadline date for case briefs.\10\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(i); see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). \10\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and date to be determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. All documents must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically-filed request must be received successfully in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. International Trade Commission (ITC) Notification In accordance with section 733(f) of the Act, we are notifying the ITC of our affirmative preliminary determination of sales at LTFV. If our final determination is affirmative, the ITC will determine before the later of 120 days after the date of this preliminary determination or 45 days after our final determination whether these imports are materially injuring, or threaten material injury to, the U.S. industry. This determination is issued and published in accordance with sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(c). Dated: January 26, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I Scope of the Investigation The scope of this investigation covers finished carbon steel flanges. Finished carbon steel flanges differ from unfinished carbon steel flanges (also known as carbon steel flange forgings) in that they have undergone further processing after forging, including, but not limited to, beveling, bore threading, center or step boring, face machining, taper boring, machining ends or surfaces, drilling bolt holes, and/or de-burring or shot blasting. Any one of these post-forging processes suffices to render the forging into a finished carbon steel flange for purposes of this investigation. However, mere heat treatment of a carbon steel flange forging (without any other further processing after forging) does not render the forging into a finished carbon steel flange for purposes of this investigation. While these finished carbon steel flanges are generally manufactured to specification ASME B16.5 or ASME B16.47 series A or series B, the scope is not limited to flanges produced under those specifications. All types of finished carbon steel flanges are included in the scope regardless of pipe size (which may or may not be expressed in inches of nominal pipe size), pressure class (usually, but not necessarily, expressed in pounds of pressure, e.g., 150, 300, 400, 600, 900, 1500, 2500, etc.), type of face (e.g., flat face, full face, raised face, etc.), configuration (e.g., weld neck, slip on, socket weld, lap joint, threaded, etc.), wall thickness (usually, but not necessarily, expressed in inches), normalization, or whether or not heat treated. These carbon steel flanges either meet or exceed the requirements of the ASTM A105, ASTM A694, ASTM A181, ASTM A350 and ASTM A707 standards (or comparable foreign specifications). The scope includes any flanges produced to the above-referenced ASTM standards as currently stated or as may be amended. The term ``carbon steel'' under this scope is steel in which: (a) Iron predominates, by weight, over each of the other contained elements; (b) the carbon content is 2 percent or less, by weight; and (c) none of the elements listed below exceeds the quantity, by weight, as indicated: (i) 0.87 percent of aluminum; (ii) 0.0105 percent of boron; (iii) 10.10 percent of chromium; (iv) 1.55 percent of columbium; (v) 3.10 percent of copper; (vi) 0.38 percent of lead; (vii) 3.04 percent of manganese; (viii) 2.05 percent of molybdenum; (ix) 20.15 percent of nickel; (x) 1.55 percent of niobium; (xi) 0.20 percent of nitrogen; (xii) 0.21 percent of phosphorus; (xiii) 3.10 percent of silicon; (xiv) 0.21 percent of sulfur; (xv) 1.05 percent of titanium; (xvi) 4.06 percent of tungsten; (xvii) 0.53 percent of vanadium; or [[Page 9726]] (xviii) 0.015 percent of zirconium. Finished carbon steel flanges are currently classified under subheadings 7307.91.5010 and 7307.91.5050 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). They may also be entered under HTSUS subheadings 7307.91.5030 and 7307.91.5070. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes; the written description of the scope is dispositive. Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Period of Investigation 4. Scope of the Investigation 5. Scope Comments 6. Application of Facts Available and Use of Adverse Inference 7. Calculation of All-Others Rate 8. Verification 9. Conclusion [FR Doc. 2017-02606 Filed 2-7-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 8, 2017 / Notices 9723
Decision Memorandum are identical in Secretary for Enforcement and to be the exporter-specific rate
content. Compliance, U.S. Department of published for the most recently
Commerce, within 30 days after the completed segment of this proceeding;
Preliminary Results of Review
publication of this notice.9 (2) for all PRC exporters of subject
The Department’s change in policy Electronically filed case briefs/written merchandise that have not been found
regarding conditional review of the comments and hearing requests must be to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash
PRC-wide entity applies to this AR.4 received successfully in their entirety by deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-
Aside from RZBC, for which the AR is the Department’s electronic records wide entity, 156.87 percent; and (3) for
being rescinded, the Department system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern all non-PRC exporters of subject
considers all other companies for which Time, within 30 days after the date of merchandise which have not received
a review was requested to be part of the publication of this notice.10 Hearing their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
PRC-wide entity. Because Taihe did not requests should contain: (1) The party’s be the rate applicable to the PRC
respond to the Department’s original name, address and telephone number; exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC
questionnaire and did not provide (2) the number of participants; and (3) exporter. These deposit requirements,
separate rate information, Taihe has not a list of issues to be discussed. Issues when imposed, shall remain in effect
established its eligibility for separate raised in the hearing will be limited to until further notice.
rate status and, therefore, is part of the those issues raised in the respective case
PRC-wide entity. briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, Notification to Importers
In addition to Taihe, 14 companies parties will be notified of the time and This notice also serves as a
listed in the Initiation Notice and, thus, date of the hearing which will be held preliminary reminder to importers of
subject to this AR, failed to provide at the U.S. Department of Commerce, their responsibility under 19 CFR
separate rate applications or separate 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
rate certifications necessary to establish Washington, DC 20230. regarding the reimbursement of
their eligibility for a separate rate. The Department intends to issue the antidumping duties prior to liquidation
Therefore, the Department preliminarily final results of this AR, including the of the relevant entries during this
determines that these 14 companies are results of its analysis of the issues raised review period. Failure to comply with
not eligible for a separate rate and are in any written briefs, not later than 120 this requirement could result in the
part of the PRC-wide entity. days after the date of publication of this Department’s presumption that
The rate previously established for the notice, unless extended, pursuant to reimbursement of antidumping duties
PRC-wide entity in this proceeding is section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. occurred and the subsequent assessment
156.87 percent.5 For additional Assessment Rates of double antidumping duties.
information, see the Preliminary We are issuing and publishing these
Decision Memorandum. Upon issuance of the final results, the results in accordance with sections
Department will determine, and CBP 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
Disclosure and Public Comment shall assess, antidumping duties on all CFR 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4).
Interested parties may submit case appropriate entries covered by this
review.11 The Department intends to Dated: January 31, 2017.
briefs and/or written comments, filed
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 Ronald K. Lorentzen,
electronically using ACCESS, within 30
days of the date of publication of these days after the publication date of the Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
final results of this review. The and Compliance.
preliminary results of review.6 Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in the Department intends to instruct CBP to Appendix
case briefs, will be due five days after liquidate entries of subject merchandise
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
the due date for case briefs.7 Parties who from the PRC-wide entity, including
Decision Memorandum
submit case or rebuttal briefs in this entries of subject merchandise from
Taihe, at 156.87 percent (the PRC-wide I. Summary
proceeding are requested to submit with II. Background
each argument a statement of the issue, rate).12 III. Partial Rescission
a summary of the argument not to Cash Deposit Requirements IV. Scope of the Order
exceed five pages, and a table of V. Discussion of the Methodology
authorities.8 The following cash deposit VI. Recommendation
Further, interested parties who wish requirements will be effective upon
[FR Doc. 2017–02528 Filed 2–7–17; 8:45 am]
to request a hearing must submit a publication of the final results of this
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
written request to the Assistant AR for all shipments of the subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
4 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement from warehouse, for consumption on or DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
of Change in Department Practice for Respondent after the publication date of the final
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and results of review, as provided by section International Trade Administration
Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
previously investigated or reviewed PRC [A–469–815]
FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). Under this policy,
the PRC-wide entity will not be under review and non-PRC exporters which are not Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From
unless a party specifically requests, or the under review in this segment of the
Department self-initiates, a review of the entity. Spain: Preliminary Determination of
proceeding but which have separate
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Because no party requested a review of the PRC- Sales at Less Than Fair Value
wide entity in this review, the entity’s rate (i.e., rates, the cash deposit rate will continue
156.87 percent) is not subject to change. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
5 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from 9 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). International Trade Administration,
the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 10 Id.
Department of Commerce.
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013– 11 See19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
2014, 80 FR 77323, 77324 (December 14, 2015). SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
12 Fora full discussion of this practice, see Non-
6 See 19 CFR 351.309(c).
Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
(the Department) preliminarily
7 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 determines that finished carbon steel
8 See 19 CFR 351.309(c). (October 24, 2011). flanges from Spain are being, or are
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:36 Feb 07, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM 08FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_9748/page/1.svg)
![9726 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 8, 2017 / Notices
(xviii) 0.015 percent of zirconium. I. Abstract Affected Public: Individuals or
Finished carbon steel flanges are currently households; state, local, or tribal
classified under subheadings 7307.91.5010 This request is for extension of a
currently approved information government.
and 7307.91.5050 of the Harmonized Tariff Estimated Number of Respondents:
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). They collection.
33.
may also be entered under HTSUS This information collection describes Estimated Time per Response: Permit
subheadings 7307.91.5030 and 7307.91.5070. special permits issued to participants in
The HTSUS subheadings are provided for applications, 10 minutes; Community
the Pacific halibut subsistence fishery in harvest log, 30 minutes; Ceremonial or
convenience and customs purposes; the waters off the coast of Alaska and any
written description of the scope is educational harvest log, 30 minutes;
appeals resulting from denials. The Appeal for permit denial, 4 hours.
dispositive.
National Marine Fisheries Service Estimated Total Annual Burden
Appendix II (NMFS) designed the permits to work in Hours: 17.
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
conjunction with other halibut harvest Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Decision Memorandum assessment measures. Subsistence Public: $21 in recordkeeping/reporting
fishing for halibut has occurred for costs.
1. Summary
2. Background
many years among the Alaska Native
people and non-Native people. Special IV. Request for Comments
3. Period of Investigation
4. Scope of the Investigation permits are initiated in response to the Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
5. Scope Comments concerns of Native and community the proposed collection of information
6. Application of Facts Available and Use of groups regarding increased restrictions is necessary for the proper performance
Adverse Inference in International Pacific Halibut of the functions of the agency, including
7. Calculation of All-Others Rate Commission Area 2C and include whether the information shall have
8. Verification Community Harvest Permits, practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
9. Conclusion Ceremonial Permits, and Educational agency’s estimate of the burden
[FR Doc. 2017–02606 Filed 2–7–17; 8:45 am] Permits. (including hours and cost) of the
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P A Community Harvest Permit allows proposed collection of information; (c)
the community or Alaska Native tribe to ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
appoint one or more individuals from clarity of the information to be
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE its respective community or tribe to collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
harvest subsistence halibut from a single burden of the collection of information
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
vessel under reduced gear and harvest on respondents, including through the
Administration
restrictions. use of automated collection techniques
Proposed Information Collection; Ceremonial and Educational Permits or other forms of information
Comment Request; Special are available exclusively to Alaska technology.
Subsistence Permits and Harvest Logs Native tribes. Eligible Alaska Native Comments submitted in response to
for Pacific Halibut in Waters Off Alaska tribes may appoint only one Ceremonial this notice will be summarized and/or
Permit Coordinator per tribe for included in the request for OMB
AGENCY:National Oceanic and Ceremonial Permits or one authorized approval of this information collection;
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Instructor per tribe for Educational they also will become a matter of public
Commerce. Permits. record.
Except for enrolled students fishing Dated: February 3, 2017.
ACTION: Notice.
under a valid Educational Permit, Sarah Brabson,
SUMMARY: The Department of special permits require persons fishing
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
Commerce, as part of its continuing under them to also possess a
[FR Doc. 2017–02591 Filed 2–7–17; 8:45 am]
effort to reduce paperwork and Subsistence Halibut Registration
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
respondent burden, invites the general Certificate (SHARC) (see OMB No.
public and other Federal agencies to 0648–0460) which identifies those
take this opportunity to comment on persons who are currently eligible for
subsistence halibut fishing. Each of the CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
proposed and/or continuing information COMMUNITY SERVICE
collections, as required by the instruments is designed to minimize the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. reporting burden on subsistence halibut
Proposed Information Collection;
fishermen while retrieving essential
DATES:Written comments must be Comment Request
information.
submitted on or before April 10, 2017. AGENCY: Corporation for National and
II. Method of Collection
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments Community Service.
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental Respondents have a choice of either ACTION: Notice.
Paperwork Clearance Officer, electronic or paper forms. Methods of
Department of Commerce, Room 6616, submittal include online, email of SUMMARY: The Corporation for National
14th and Constitution Avenue NW., electronic forms, mail, and facsimile and Community Service (CNCS), as part
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the transmission of paper forms. of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Internet at JJessup@doc.gov). Educational Permits may not be applied
for online. conducts a pre-clearance consultation
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: program to provide the general public
Requests for additional information or III. Data and federal agencies with an
copies of the information collection OMB Control Number: 0648–0512. opportunity to comment on proposed
instruments and instructions should be Form Number: None. and/or continuing collections of
directed to Rachel Baker, (907) 586– Type of Review: Regular submission information in accordance with the
7425 or rachel.baker@noaa.gov. (extension of a currently approved Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: collection). (PRA95) . This program helps to ensure
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:36 Feb 07, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM 08FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_9748/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2017-02-08 02:59:15
Document Modified: 2017-02-08 02:59:15
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective February 8, 2017. | |
| Contact | Mark Flessner or Erin Kearney, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6312 or (202) 482-0167, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 9723 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR